Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Nomenclature
Roman
Wh
Thermal capacity [ ]
C
Difference operators
Load factor [p. u. ]
Loss-of-life [s]
Ratio of load loss ( ) to no-load loss at rated load
( )
Relative aging rate
Ws
Ws
Conductor specific heat [ ], 390[ ] for copper
kgK
kgK
Greek
Subscripts
Empirical factors
Core and coil assembly
Tank and fittings
Ambient
At time of doing the research, the author was at
Powertech Transformers (Pty) Ltd, 1 Buitenkant
Street, Pretoria West, 0183. Currently at Eskom
Holdings (SOC) Ltd, Sunninghill, 2157. E-mail:
holtshcb@eskom.co.za
11,21,22
a.
Hot-spot
Top-oil
Mean-oil
Rated load ( = 1.00)
Standard paper (Non-thermally upgraded)
Supplied
Thermally upgraded paper
Winding
Introduction
2
2.1
Transformer modelling
Exponential time constant analogy
R & D Journal of the South African Institution of Mechanical Engineering 2015, 31, 12-16
http://www.saimeche.org.za (open access) SAIMechE All rights reserved.
12
Measured
Calculated
120
180
300
420
Time [min]
540
660
= 11
+ [ ]
(1)
2.3
11
(4)
2 +1
+1
[ ]
15000
15000
= 110+273 +273
The loss-of-life can then be calculated using:
(7)
= 1 or =
=1
(8)
Hot-spot
Top-oil
Loss-of-life
100
Difference solution
60
Loss-of-life [days]
60
(3)
60
Temperature [C]
2.2
2.4
40
+1
80
90
80
70
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
8
12
16
Loading time [hr]
20
24
(2)
Transformer modelling
R & D Journal of the South African Institution of Mechanical Engineering 2015, 31, 12-16
http://www.saimeche.org.za (open access) SAIMechE All rights reserved.
13
1 =
And,
2 =
22
21 1
1
)
22
(21 1) 2
(10)
160
140
120
IEC
MATLAB
IEC
MATLAB
100
Algorithm application
6
5
4
3
2
1
80
0
0
(11)
Where:
(12)
() = 1 () 2 ()
()
into two separate difference
The separation of
equations represents two separate physical phenomena. Note
that equation 10 contains the winding time constant while
equation 11 contains the oil time constant . The first
equation represents the faster fundamental hot-spot
temperature rise which does not consider the oil flow passing
it3. The second equation represents the slower effect of the oil
flow passing the hot-spot3.
Finally, the hot-spot temperature is solved by adding the
temperature rise of the hot-spot to the absolute top-oil
temperature at the th time step:
(13)
() = () + ()
The relative aging rate at the nth time step is solved using:
() = () +
(14)
Again, the difference equation for loss-of-life is solved
similarly to equation 9:
() = ( 1) + ()
(15)
It is important to note that in order to get an accurate
temperature response; the time step should not be greater than
half the smallest time constant in the thermal model3.
An application of the solution routine discussed is
presented in figure 3. The solution routine was implemented
in MATLAB and compared to an example provided in Annex
C of IEC 60076-7:20053. The logic flow for the solution
routine is also depicted in a section of figure 4, highlighted
by the segmented square.
180
Loss-of-life [days]
20
40
60
80
Loading time [min]
100
120
Loss [kW]
223.6
17.1
200.4
16.2
Mass [kg]
24782.6
14069.4
9112.1
8648.5
Rise [K]
39.3
51
15.3
Absolute[C]
30
115
160
Results
R & D Journal of the South African Institution of Mechanical Engineering 2015, 31, 12-16
http://www.saimeche.org.za (open access) SAIMechE All rights reserved.
14
2
1.9
1.8
1.7
1.6
1.5
1.4
0
0.5
1.5
2
2.5
Time to limit [hr]
3.5
60
Specific, Standard
Specific, Upgraded
Default, Standard
Default, Upgraded
50
Loss-of-life [days]
Algorithm application
Solution routine
40
30
20
10
0
1.4
Loss-of-life [days]
Time to limit
[hr]
Default
Standard
1.4
1.45
1.5
1.55
1.6
1.65
1.7
1.8
1.9
2
2.1
2.2
Tabulated results
Default
Upgraded
No
2.2
Specific
Standard
Yes
2.1
Specific
Upgraded
Load factor
[K]
No
Yes
Default
No
1.6
Specific
Yes
Thermally
upgraded paper?
1.5
cont.
1.78
1.28
1.02
0.85
0.73
0.65
0.52
0.4
0.3
0.23
0.2
cont.
cont.
3.5
2.62
2.13
1.8
1.57
1.23
1.02
0.77
0.62
0.52
cont.
1.394
1.226
1.18
1.206
1.273
1.392
1.597
1.551
1.224
0.949
0.962
cont.
10.663
10.02
10.308
11.306
12.869
15.277
20.381
21.845
17.632
13.654
14.138
cont.
cont.
3.08
2.812
2.812
2.879
3.043
3.404
3.869
2.98
2.472
2.145
cont.
cont.
23.906
23.906
25.682
28.222
32.134
41.406
54.021
42.013
35.336
31.139
Acknowledgements
Figure 4: MATLAB program flow chart
R & D Journal of the South African Institution of Mechanical Engineering 2015, 31, 12-16
http://www.saimeche.org.za (open access) SAIMechE All rights reserved.
15
References
1.
Appendix
Thermal-electrical analogy
The basis of this approach is that of a thermal-electrical
circuit, as shown in figure 77. This model followed from the
need for an electrically intuitive analogy in a predominantly
electrical environment and is the subject of several relatively
recent studies1, 8, 9, 10.
Favourably, differential equations follow directly from
the RC-circuit analogy7. Also, because the step change is no
longer represented by an exponential function the solution
curve needs no correction factor7.
The differential equation for the equivalent circuit shown
in figure 1 is:
+ =
[ ]1/
If we define,
= ratio of to at rated load ( = 1.00)
= . , and
=
then equation 16 reduces to:
2 +1
+1
[ ]1/ =
+ [ ]1/
(17)
2 +1
+1
[ ]1/ [ ]1/
(18)
95
90
85
80
75
70
65
60
0
20
40
60
80
Loading time [min]
100
120
(16)
R & D Journal of the South African Institution of Mechanical Engineering 2015, 31, 12-16
http://www.saimeche.org.za (open access) SAIMechE All rights reserved.
16