UC Davis Asbestos Analysis

November 25, 2013
Mr. Greg Secor

University of California at Davis
Design & Construction Management
255 Cousteau Place
Davis, CA 95618
Re:
Transmitted via email:gsecor@ucdavis.edu
Asbestos and Lead Surveys for Seismic V Project

University of California at Davis, Central Plant, Med Sci 1B, Olson Hall and Wright Hall
One Shields Avenue, Davis, California
ACC Project #: 3028-067.00
Dear Mr. Secor:

Per your request, ACC Environmental Consultants, Inc. (ACC) performed limited asbestos surveys of The Central
Plant, Med Sci 1B, Olson Hall and Wright Hall, located at University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis,
California, in October and November of 2013. The surveys of the referenced sites were performed to identify
suspect asbestos-containing building materials and loose & peeling lead-containing paint that may be impacted
during the planned preliminary investigation project. Common suspect asbestos-containing building materials that
may be impacted by typical projects may include but are not limited to, the following materials:
Flooring & Associated Adhesives

Baseboard & Associated Adhesives
Gypsum Wallboard, Taping/Joint Compounds, & Texturing Compounds
Plaster Wall & Ceiling Systems
Spray Applied Acoustical Material
Fireproofing
Pipe, Pipe Elbows & Pipe Fitting Insulation
Boiler & Flue Insulation
HVAC Duct Insulation
HVAC Joint Mudding & Duct Tape
Sink Undercoating
Asbestos-cement (Transite) Flues, Panels & Shingles
Ceramic Tile Grout and Underlayment
Interior & Exterior Stucco
Brick Mortar
Roofing Materials
Building components not associated with the planned investigation project were not sampled. Furthermore,
limited lead sampling was conducted to identify suspect lead-containing coatings that may be disturbed by project
activities for the purpose of compliance with Cal-OSHAs Lead in Construction Standard and is not intended to
Northern California: 7977 Capwell Drive, Suite 100 Oakland, CA 94621 (510) 638-8400 Fax (510) 638-8404
Southern California: 1055 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1450, Los Angeles, CA 90017 (213) 353-1240 Fax (213) 353-1244
UC Davis Seismic V; Asbestos & Lead Paint Surveys

UC Davis DCM
November 2013
Page 2 of 18
be a Lead Inspection or Lead Risk Assessment as defined by the California Department of Public Health
(DPH).
Asbestos Bulk Sample Results

Mr. Chris Yama, a Cal/OSHA Certified Asbestos Consultant (CAC #98-2356) with ACC, performed bulk
sampling of suspect asbestos-containing materials during October and November of 2013. Two Hundred ninetyeight (298) samples of suspect materials were submitted for analysis. Copies of the laboratory results are attached.
The samples were delivered to Forensic Analytical Laboratories, of Hayward, California; an independent
laboratory that participates in the bulk sample proficiency analysis program conducted by the United States
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and is accredited by the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation
Program (NVLAP). The samples were analyzed using Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) with dispersion
staining to estimate percent composition by volume. Samples with less than 1% (<1%) asbestos are designated as
Trace asbestos. Samples with no observable asbestiform minerals are designated as no asbestos detected.
Summary of Asbestos Bulk Sample Results
Central Plant
Sample
No.
Material Description
Location Description
RC-1-1
Tar and Gravel

Roofing
Southwest Roof
RM-2-1
Perimeter Roofing
Southwest Roof
RP-3-1
Roof Patching Mastic
Southwest Roof
JC-5-1, 2,
3, 4, 5
Drywall & Joint

Compound
Throughout Building
B
WT-6-1
Wall Texture on Drywall
Throughout Building A
JC-7-1, 2,
3, 4, 5
PI-8-1, 2,
3
Drywall & Joint

Compound
Hardpack Pipe
Insulation
Fiberglass Pipe
Insulation
PI-9-1
Throughout Building A
Throughout Plant
Complex
Throughout Plant
Complex
TG-10-1
Ceramic Tile on
Drywall
Throughout Building
B
CT-11-1
2 X 4 White Ceiling
Tile with Fissures
Building A
MI-12-1,
2, 3
RP-13-1,
2
CT-14-1
Concrete
Roof Patch
2 X 4 White Ceiling
Tile - Textured
Throughout Plant
Complex
Parapet Walls and
Penetrations Bldg A
Building A
Results
Felt: 10% Chrysotile Asbestos
Off White Canvas: No Asbestos
Detected
Tar: 10% Chrysotile Asbestos
Mastic: No Asbestos Detected
Drywall: No Asbestos Detected
Joint Compound: 2% Chrysotile
Asbestos
Composite Point Count: <1% Chrysotile
Asbestos
Wall Texture: No Asbestos Detected
Joint Compound: No Asbestos Detected
Insulation: 10% Amosite Asbestos
Insulation: No Asbestos Detected
Grout: No Asbestos Detected
Asbestos
Tile: No Asbestos Detected
Paint: No Asbestos Detected
Concrete: No Asbestos Detected
Approx.
Quantity*
NESHAPS
Category1
OSHA
Class2
9,200 SF
Category 1
Class 2
2,100 SF
Category 1
Class 2
N/Q
N/A
N/A
3,200 SF
Unclassifi
ed
Class 2
N/Q
N/A
N/A
N/Q
N/A
N/A
1,410 LF
Friable
RACM
Class 1
N/Q
N/A
N/A
240 SF
Unclassifi
ed
Class 2
N/Q
N/A
N/A
N/Q
N/A
N/A
420 SF
Cat I
Class 2
N/Q
N/A
N/A

UC Davis DCM
November 2013
Page 3 of 18
Sample
No.
CT-15-1
2 X 4 White Ceiling
Tile with Fissures
Building A
ES-16-1,
2, 3
Exterior Stucco
At VFD Room
RC-17-1,
2
White Painted Rolled

Roofing
Bldg A
BA-18-1,
2
Brown Base Adhesive
MI-19-1, 2
FA-20-1
GC-21-1,
2
WT-22-1,
2, 3
GC-23-1,
2
CK-24-1,
2, 3
Epoxy Floor and Red

Concrete
12 X 12 Grey Floor
Tile and Yellow
Adhesive
1 X 1 White Ceiling
Tile Large Fissures with
Brown Mastic
Wall Texture on
Concrete
1 X 1 White Ceiling
Tile Small Fissures with
Brown Mastic
Results
Approx.
Quantity*
NESHAPS
Category1
OSHA
Class2
N/Q
N/A
N/A

Stucco: No Asbestos Detected
Tar: No Asbestos Detected
N/Q
N/A
N/A
420 SF
Cat I
Class 2
Throughout Plant
Complex
Adhesive: No Asbestos Detected
N/Q
N/A
N/A
Bathroom
Epoxy: No Asbestos Detected

Red Concrete: No Asbestos Detected
N/Q
N/A
N/A
Old Control Room

N/Q
N/A
N/A
Old Control Room

N/Q
N/A
N/A
Bathroom
Texture: No Asbestos Detected

N/Q
N/A
N/A
VFD Room Hallway

N/Q
N/A
N/A
Perimeter of Windows
Caulk: No Asbestos Detected
N/Q
N/A
N/A
and Louvers
Throughout Plant
MI-25-1, 2 Concrete
N/Q
N/A
N/A
Complex-Exterior
Throughout Plant
Debris: <1% Amosite Asbestos
Friable
DB-26-1
Debris Insulation
2,250 SF
Class 1
Complex
RACM
*Approximate quantities should be verified during any project planning as the building was occupied during the survey and ACC was
unable to perform a fully destructive investigation to identify all concealed conditions.
Beige/Tan Caulk
Med Sci 1B
Sample
No.
Results
Approx.
Quantity*
NESHAPS
Category1
OSHA
Class2
ES-1-1, 2,
3, 4, 5, 6,
7, 8, 9
Exterior Stucco
At Soffits and Roof

Wells
Stucco: No Asbestos Detected

N/Q
N/A
N/A
MI-2-1, 2
Terrazzo Floor
Bathrooms
Terrazzo: No Asbestos Detected
N/Q
N/A
N/A
MI-3-1, 2,
3
Concrete
Throughout Building
N/Q
N/A
N/A
CK-4-1, 2
Grey Caulking
Roof Wells
Caulking: No Asbestos Detected
N/Q
N/A
N/A
BA-5-1, 2
Brown Base Adhesive
Throughout Building
N/Q
N/A
N/A
Throughout Building
Tile: 2% Chrysotile Asbestos

700 SF
Cat I
Class 2
N/Q
N/A
N/A
N/Q
N/A
N/A
FA-6-1, 2
TG-7-1, 2
PI-8-1
12 X 12 Beige Floor
Tile and Black
Adhesive
Ceramic Tile Grout and
Adhesive
Fiberglass Pipe
Insulation
Bathrooms
Throughout Building


UC Davis DCM
November 2013
Page 4 of 18
Sample
No.
PE-9-1, 2,
3, 4
JC-10-1,
2, 3, 4, 5,
6, 7, 8, 9
CT-11-1,
2
Insulation at Pipe Racks
Throughout Building
Drywall & Joint

Compound
Throughout Building
CT-13-1,
2
2 X 4 White Ceiling
Tile with Pinholes
2 X 4 White Ceiling
Tile with Fissures
2 X 2 White Ceiling
Tile with Pinholes
RP-14-1
CT-12-1
CM-17-1,
2
RC-18-1,
2
1 X 1 White Ceiling
Tile Fiberglass with
Brown Mastic
1 X 1 White Ceiling
Tile Cellulose with
Brown Mastic
Brown Ceiling Tile
Mastic
Tar and Gravel
Roofing
RM-19-1
Membrane Roofing
GC-15-1
CT-16-1,
2
Store #135
Store #135
Throughout Building
Results
Joint Compound: No Asbestos Detected
Approx.
Quantity*
NESHAPS
Category1
OSHA
Class2
N/Q
N/A
N/A
N/Q
N/A
N/A
N/Q
N/A
N/A
N/Q
N/A
N/A
N/Q
N/A
N/A
Mechanical Wells
N/Q
N/A
N/A
Library Bathrooms

N/Q
N/A
N/A
Library Bathrooms

N/Q
N/A
N/A
Library Bathrooms
N/Q
N/A
N/A
Mechanical Wells

980 SF
Cat I
Class 2
Mechanical Well, SW
Membrane: No Asbestos Detected
N/Q
N/A
N/A
Olson Hall
Sample
No.
A-PL-1-1,
2, 3
A-RM-2-1,
2
WT-1-1, 2,
3, 4, 5, 6,
7
CK-2-1, 2,
3
Results
NESHAPS
Category1
OSHA
Class2
N/Q
N/A
N/A
N/Q
N/A
N/A
52,000 SF
Friable
RACM
Class 2
Plaster
2nd Floor Shop at

Chase
Membrane Roofing, Felt

and Tar
Middle of Main Roof
Wall Texture on
Concrete
Throughout Building
Grey Caulking
Around Windows and at

Expansion Joints
N/Q
N/A
N/A
Tan Caulking
Top of Roof Seams
N/Q
N/A
N/A
Grey Window Putty
Rooftop Windows
Putty: No Asbestos Detected
N/Q
N/A
N/A
Silver Foil with

Brown/Yellow Mastic
Above Ceiling
Throughout Building
N/Q
N/A
N/A
RP-6-1, 2
Roof Walkways
N/Q
N/A
N/A
PI-7-1, 2,
3
PE-8-1, 2,
3
Hardpack Pipe
Insulation
Pipe Elbows on
Fiberglass Lines
CK-3-1, 2
WP-4-1,
2, 3, 4
AD-5-1, 2,
3
Throughout Building
Throughout Building
Plaster: No Asbestos Detected

Membrane Roofing: No Asbestos Detected
Approx.
Quantity*
Wall Texture: 2% Chrysotile Asbestos

Insulation: 2% Chrysotile Asbestos
1,700 LF
900 EA
Friable
RACM
Friable
RACM
Class 1
Class 1

UC Davis DCM
November 2013
Page 5 of 18
Sample
No.
SA-9-1, 2,
3, 4, 5, 6,
7
Acoustic Plaster with

Metal Lath
Stairwells and Center

Lobbies
Plaster: 2% Chrysotile Asbestos
MI-10-1, 2
Terrazzo Floor
Center Lobbies
Terrazzo: No Asbestos Detected
FA-11-1,
2
12 X 12 Beige Floor
Tile over 9 X 9 and
Black Adhesive
Throughout Building
Bottom Tile: 5% Chrysotile Asbestos

Bottom Mastic: 5% Chrysotile Asbestos
Brown Window Putty
Lower Windows
Beige and Brown Base

Adhesive
Wall Covering
WP-12-1,
2, 3
BA-13-1,
2, 3
MI-14-1
Approx.
Quantity*
NESHAPS
Category1
OSHA
Class2
4,000 SF
Friable
RACM
Class 1
N/Q
N/A
N/A
2,400 SF
Cat I
Class 2
Putty: No Asbestos Detected
N/Q
N/A
N/A
Throughout Building
N/Q
N/A
N/A
Throughout Building
Glue: No Asbestos Detected
N/Q
N/A
N/A
Throughout Building,
Hallways

Mastic: 2% Chrysotile Asbestos
15,400 SF
Cat I
Class 2
N/Q
N/A
N/A
N/Q
N/A
N/A
N/Q
N/A
N/A
CT-20-1,
2
CM-22-1,
2
CM-23-1,
2
12 X 12 Green and
Purple Floor Tile
Black and Yellow
Adhesive
Ceramic Wall Tile Grout
and Adhesive
Ceramic Tile Grout and
Underlayment
Ceramic Floor Tile
Grout and Adhesive
1 X 1 White Ceiling
Tile Fiberglass with
Brown Mastic
1 X 1 White Ceiling
Tile Cellulose
Ceiling Tile Mastic,
Yellow
Ceiling Tile Mastic,
Brown
MI-24-1, 2
Tan Epoxy Flooring
Rooms 230 and 250
MI-25-1, 2
Concrete Exterior
Throughout Exterior
MI-26-1, 2
Concrete Interior
Throughout Building
AD-27-1
Black Adhesive on
Ductwork
DB-28-1,
2
Insulation Debris
Basement Mechanical
Room
Mechanical Rooms
and Mechanical
Closets Throughout
Building
PL-29-1,
2, 3, 4, 5,
6, 7
Plaster
FA-15-1,
2, 3, 4
TG-16-1
TG-17-1
TG-18-1,
2
GC-19-1,
2
DI-30-1, 2
DI-31-1
Fiberglass Duct
Insulation with Silver
Cover
Fiberglass Duct
Insulation with Canvas
Cover
Bathrooms
Janitor Closets
Bathrooms
Results

Underlayment: No Asbestos Detected
2nd Floor South

N/Q
N/A
N/A
Throughout Building

N/Q
N/A
N/A
Throughout Building
N/Q
N/A
N/A
Throughout Building
N/Q
N/A
N/A
N/Q
N/A
N/A
N/Q
N/A
N/A
N/Q
N/A
N/A
1,200 SF
Cat II
Class 2
Debris: 2% Amosite Asbestos
20,400 SF
Friable
RACM
Class 2

N/Q
N/A
N/A
N/Q
N/A
N/A
N/Q
N/A
N/A
Throughout Building
Throughout Building
Throughout Building


Cover: No Asbestos Detected

UC Davis DCM
November 2013
Page 6 of 18
Sample
No.
FA-32-1
12 X 12 Beige Floor
with Yellow Mastic
FA-33-1,
2
9 X 9 Tan Floor Tile

and Black Adhesive
Room 206 on Elevated
Floor. Note FA-33 is
below elevated Floor
Partially Concealed by
various Floor
Coverings and
Elevated Floors
Approx.
Quantity*
NESHAPS
Category1
OSHA
Class2
N/Q
N/A
N/A

48,000 SF
Cat I
Class 2
16,200 SF
Unclassifi
ed
Class 2
Results
JC-34-1,
2, 3, 4, 5,
6, 7, 8
Drywall & Joint

Compound
Throughout Building

Asbestos
Asbestos
CM-35-1
Ceiling Tile Mastic, Tan
Throughout Building
N/Q
N/A
N/A
CT-36-1,
2
2 X 2 White Ceiling
Tile With Pinholes
Throughout Building

N/Q
N/A
N/A
FA-37-1
12 X 12 Tan Floor with

Yellow Mastic
Rooms 248 and 248A

on Elevated Floor.
Note FA-33 is below
elevated Floor

N/Q
N/A
N/A
Elevator

30 SF
Cat I
Class 2
Throughout Building
9,400 LF
Cat II
Class 2
Throughout Building
N/Q
N/A
N/A
Throughout Building

N/Q
N/A
N/A
FA-38-1
AD-39-1,
2, 3
AD-40-1
CT-41-1,
2
12 X 12 Tan Floor
Tile and Yellow
Adhesive
Tan/Brown Adhesive
on Perimeter of
Ceiling Grids
Yellow Wall Panel
Adhesive
2 X 4 White Ceiling
Tile With Fissures
Friable
Class 2
RACM
FD-42
Fire Doors
Throughout Building
Assumed Asbestos
16 Each
Wright Hall
Sample
No.
RM-1-1, 2,
3
SA-3-1, 2,
3
PI-4-1, 2,
3
PL-5-1, 2,
3, 4, 5, 6,
7, 8
TG-6-1
Membrane Roofing,
Felt, Tar and
Lightweight Concrete
Middle of West Lower
Roof
Results
Membrane Roofing: No Asbestos Detected
Lightweight Concrete: No Asbestos
Detected
Approx.
Quantity*
NESHAPS
Category1
OSHA
Class2
N/Q
N/A
N/A

Metal Lath
Hardpack Pipe
Insulation
Throughout Theatre
and Theatre Lobby
Plaster
Throughout Building

N/Q
N/A
N/A
Brown Ceramic Tile

Grout and
Underlayment
Bathrooms

N/Q
N/A
N/A
Throughout Building
900 SF
2,200 LF
Friable
RACM
Friable
RACM
Class 1
Class 1

UC Davis DCM
November 2013
Page 7 of 18
Sample
No.
Tan Ceramic Tile Grout

and Underlayment
Bathrooms
Plaster on Drywall
Above Ceiling on
Second Floor
Tan and Beige

Waterproofing Paint
Throughout Exterior
SV-11-1
Tan Sheet Vinyl
Restrooms at Lobby
MI-12-1, 2
Lightweight Concrete
Above Ceiling on
Second Floor
BA-13-1,
2
Brown Base Adhesive
Throughout Building
MI-14-1, 2
Firestop
Throughout Building
JC-15-1,
2, 3, 4, 5,
6, 7, 8
Drywall & Joint

Compound
Throughout Building
FA-16-1,
2, 3

and Black Adhesive
Throughout Building
MI-17-1, 2
Concrete
Throughout Building
CT-18-1
2 X 4 White Ceiling
Tile Fiberglass
Throughout Building
MI-19-1,
2, 3
Concrete
Throughout Building
TG-7-1
PL-9-1, 2,
3
MI-10-1,
2, 3
Results
Waterproofing: No Asbestos Detected
Sheet Vinyl: No Asbestos Detected
Backing: No Asbestos Detected
Asbestos
Firestop: No Asbestos Detected
Asbestos
Asbestos
Tile: <1% Chrysotile Asbestos
Approx.
Quantity*
NESHAPS
Category1
OSHA
Class2
N/Q
N/A
N/A
N/Q
N/A
N/A
N/Q
N/A
N/A
N/Q
N/A
N/A
N/Q
N/A
N/A
900 LF
Cat II
Class 2
N/Q
N/A
N/A
2,600 SF
Unclassifi
ed
Class 2
800 SF
Cat I
Class 2
N/Q
N/A
N/A
N/Q
N/A
N/A
N/Q
N/A
N/A
Above Showers in
Assumed Asbestos
100 SF
Cat II
Class 2
Basement Bathroom
TP-20-1
Transite Panels
Fire/Police
Sample
No.
MI-1-1, 2
Concrete
Exterior
RM-2-1
Membrane Roof
Lower Roof
MI-3-1
Concrete Blocks CMU
Exterior
TG-4-1
Ceramic Tile, Grout

and Mastic
Bathrooms
CT-5-1, 2
White Ceiling Tile
Throughout Building
FA-6-1, 2
12 X 12 Brown Floor
Tile and Black Adhesive
Throughout Building
AD-7-1, 2,
3
Black Adhesive for

12 Brown Floor Tiles
Throughout Building
Results
Membrane: No Asbestos Detected
See Mastic Samples Below
Approx.
Quantity*
NESHAPS
Category1
OSHA
Class2
N/Q
N/A
N/A
N/Q
N/A
N/A
N/Q
N/A
N/A
400 SF
Cat II
Class 2
N/Q
N/A
N/A
N/Q
N/A
N/A
700 SF
Cat I
Class 2

UC Davis DCM
November 2013
Page 8 of 18
Sample
No.
CA-8-1
Black and Yellow

Carpet Adhesive
Throughout Building
CK-9-1
Grey Caulking
Exterior on CMU
BA-10-1,
2, 3
Brown Base Adhesive
Throughout Building
Results
Approx.
Quantity*
NESHAPS
Category1
OSHA
Class2
200 SF
Cat I
Class 2
N/Q
N/A
N/A
N/Q
N/A
N/A


Drywall & Joint
Unclassifi
Throughout Building
Asbestos
3,200 SF
Class 2
Compound
ed
Asbestos
JC-11-1,
2, 3, 4, 5,
6, 7, 8, 9
Summary of Asbestos Materials

Building
Central Plant
Tar and Gravel

Roofing
Southwest Roof
Central Plant
Perimeter Roofing
Southwest Roof
Central Plant
Drywall & Joint

Compound
Throughout Building
B
Central Plant
Hardpack Pipe
Insulation
Throughout Plant
Complex
Central Plant
Ceramic Tile on
Drywall
Throughout Building
B
Central Plant
Roof Patch
Parapet Walls and

Penetrations Bldg A
Central Plant
White Painted Rolled

Roofing
Bldg A
Central Plant
Debris Insulation
Throughout Plant
Complex
Med Sci 1B
Med Sci 1B
Olson Hall
Olson Hall
12 X 12 Beige Floor
Tile and Black
Adhesive
Tar and Gravel
Roofing
Wall Texture on
Concrete
Hardpack Pipe
Insulation
Throughout Building
Mechanical Wells
Throughout Building
Throughout Building
Results
Off White Canvas: No Asbestos
Detected
Asbestos
Asbestos
Asbestos
Debris: <1% Amosite Asbestos
Wall Texture: 2% Chrysotile Asbestos
Approx.
Quantity*
Cost
Estimate
9,200 SF
$46,000
2,100 SF
$2,100
3,200 SF
$6,400
1,410 LF
$14,100
240 SF
$900
420 SF
$2,100
420 SF
$2,100
2,250 SF
$6,750
700 SF
$1,400
980 SF
$500
52,000
SF
$16,000
1,700 LF
$5,100

UC Davis DCM
November 2013
Page 9 of 18
Building
Olson Hall
Olson Hall
Pipe Elbows on
Fiberglass Lines
Metal Lath
12 X 12 Beige Floor
Tile over 9 X 9 and
Black Adhesive
12 X 12 Green and
Purple Floor Tile
Black and Yellow
Adhesive
Black Adhesive on
Ductwork
Throughout Building
Stairwells and Center
Lobbies
Results
Insulation: 2% Chrysotile Asbestos
Approx.
Quantity*
Cost
Estimate
900 EA
$5,000
4,000 SF
$4,000
2,400 SF
$2,400
Throughout Building

Hallways

15,400
SF
$30,800
1,200 SF
$500
Debris: 2% Amosite Asbestos
20,400
SF
$5,000

48,000
SF
$96,000
Throughout Building

Asbestos
Asbestos
16,200
SF
$32,400
Elevator

30 SF
Throughout Building
9,400 LF
$18,800
Fire Doors
Throughout Building
Assumed Asbestos
16 Each
$800

Metal Lath
Hardpack Pipe
Insulation
Throughout Theatre
and Theatre Lobby
900 SF
$500
2,200 LF
$8,500
Wright Hall
Brown Base Adhesive
Throughout Building
900 LF
$900
Wright Hall
Drywall & Joint

Compound
Throughout Building
2,600 SF
$5,200
Wright Hall

and Black Adhesive
Throughout Building
800 SF
$2,400
Wright Hall
Transite Panels
Above Showers in
Basement Bathroom
Assumed Asbestos
100 SF
$500
Fire/Police
Ceramic Tile, Grout

and Mastic
Bathrooms

400 SF
$800
Olson Hall
Olson Hall
Olson Hall
Olson Hall
Insulation Debris
Olson Hall

and Black Adhesive
Olson Hall
Olson Hall
Olson Hall
Olson Hall
Wright Hall
Wright Hall
Drywall & Joint

Compound
12 X 12 Tan Floor
Tile and Yellow
Adhesive
Tan/Brown Adhesive
on Perimeter of
Ceiling Grids
Basement Mechanical
Room
Mechanical Rooms
and Mechanical
Closets Throughout
Building
Partially Concealed
by various Floor
Coverings and
Elevated Floors
Throughout Building

Asbestos
Asbestos
Asbestos
Tile: <1% Chrysotile Asbestos

UC Davis DCM
November 2013
Page 10 of 18
Building
Fire/Police
Fire/Police
Fire/Police
Black Adhesive for
12 Brown Floor Tiles
Black and Yellow
Carpet Adhesive
Drywall & Joint
Compound
Throughout Building
Throughout Building
Throughout Building
Results
Asbestos
Asbestos
Approx.
Quantity*
Cost
Estimate
700 SF
$500
200 SF
$200
6,400 SF
$19,200
Total
$348,350
EPAs NESHAPS regulations define categories of asbestos-containing materials (ACM) based on their potential of asbestos fiber release
when disturbed:
Friable - Any material containing more than 1 percent asbestos that, when dry, can be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to
powder by hand pressure.
Category I Non-friable ACM (Cat 1 NF) - Asbestos-containing packings, gaskets, resilient floor covering and asphalt roofing
products containing more than 1 percent asbestos.
Category II Non-friable ACM (Cat II NF) - Any material, excluding Category I non-friable ACM containing more than 1 percent
asbestos as determined using the methods specified under AHERA, when dry, cannot be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to
2
OSHAs Asbestos in Construction Standard (Federal - 29 CFR 1926.1101 and California 8 CCR 1529) define specific Classes of
work based on the risk of exposure to employees with the potential for disturbance of asbestos-containing materials. The classes of work
are defined as
Class 1 - Asbestos-related activities involving the removal of thermal systems insulation (TSI) and surfacing ACM or presumed
ACM.
Class 2 - Asbestos-related activities involving the removal of ACM, which are not TSI, or surfacing ACM.
Based on the sample results, the planned investigation project will impact asbestos-containing materials. The final
scope of work should be reviewed against the asbestos survey information. If asbestos-containing materials will
be disturbed during the projects, licensed asbestos abatement contractors working under standard University of
California asbestos program requirements should perform all work.
A review of all other asbestos survey information available for the property in conjunction with these results
should be conducted prior to proceeding with project activities and when a change in the project scope is
developed. If suspect asbestos-containing materials will be impacted that are not addressed in this survey or in the
historical survey records, additional sampling should be conducted prior to disturbance.
Historical records (typically predating 1995) have limited value for project planning and should be verified with
confirmatory inspection and additional sampling.
Lead Sample Results

Mr. Chris Yama, a California Department of Public Health Lead Inspector/Assessor/Monitor (I/A/M-3814) with
ACC, collected fifty-five (55) bulk samples to establish lead-paint concentration for clean up and disposal
requirements. Samples with detectable amounts of lead must be properly removed and disposed of according to
local, state and federal regulations. Lead sampling was conducted to identify suspect lead-containing coatings that

UC Davis DCM
November 2013
Page 11 of 18
may be disturbed by project activities for the purpose of compliance with Cal-OSHAs Lead in Construction
Standard and is not intended to be a Lead Inspection or Lead Risk Assessment as defined by the California
Department of Public Health.
The bulk samples were obtained from suspect lead-containing building materials identified at the building. Paint
colors and/or descriptions are identified based on the surface color observed by ACC at the time of the survey and
does not necessarily identify paint descriptions underlying the surface coat.
The sample was delivered to Forensic Analytical Laboratories, of Hayward, California; an independent American
Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) accredited laboratories, for analysis and was analyzed by Atomic
Absorption (AA) Spectroscopy in accordance with the EPA 3050B/7420 Method. The colors, locations, and lead
contents of these paints are listed below.
Summary of Lead Bulk Sample Results
Med Sci 1B
Sample
No.
PT-2
PT-3
PT-4
PT-5
PT-6
PT-7
PT-8
PT-9
PT-10
Beige on Exterior
Stucco
White, Beige, Tan and
Green on Drywall
Red and Brown on
Metal Studs
Orange and Red on
Structural Steel
Tan Ceramic Tile
Blue/Grey on Exterior
Trim and Roof
Blue/Grey on Exterior
Stucco
Tan and Yellow on
Exterior Trim
Blue Ceramic Tile
(wt% unless otherwise

noted)
Approximate
Quantity*
Estimated Removal
Costs
Throughout Building
0.0024
Intact
$0-100
Throughout Building
0.013
800 SF
Throughout Building
0.20
500 SF
Throughout Building
0.13
Intact
Bathrooms
0.014
1,200 SF
Throughout Exterior
0.23
50 SF
Throughout Exterior
.035
1,500 SF
Throughout Exterior
0.11
50 SF
Bathrooms
.053
800 SF
Material Location
Lead Content
Total
$800
$1,000
$0
$4,800
$0-200
$7,500
$0-200
$3,200
$17500-17,800
*Quantity for paint reflects approximate area of loose & peeling only, not all painted surfaces
Central Plant
Sample
No.
Material Location

noted)
Lead Content
Approximate
Quantity*
Estimated Removal
Costs
15 ppm
240 SF
$500
$100
PT-1
Black and White

Ceramic Tile
Bathroom
PT-2
Beige on Exterior Trim
Throughout Building
0.04
50 SF
PT-3
Grey, Tan Red and

Green on Doors and
Frames
Throughout Building
0.16
Intact
$0

UC Davis DCM
November 2013
Page 12 of 18
Sample
No.
Material Location
Lead Content
noted)
Approximate
Quantity*
0.15
500 SF
PT-4
Green and Yellow on

Pipes
Throughout Building
PT-5
Lt. Blue on Drywall
Bathroom
<0.006
Intact
PT-6
White/Beige on Drywall
Throughout Building
<0.006
Intact
Throughout Building
0.072
50 SF
Throughout Building
.035
500 SF
Throughout Building
7.7
50 SF
Throughout Building
1.1
50 SF
PT-7
PT-8
PT-9
PT-10
Green and White on

Interior Concrete
Green and Red on
Ducts
Grey, Green, Blue and
Red on Structural Steel
Red and Yellow on
Guard Rails
PT-11
Grey Epoxy Floor
Throughout Building
0.071
260 SF
PT-12
Lt Blue, Grey and Green

on Interior Concrete
Throughout Building
0.11
200 SF
PT-13
Grey on Floor
Throughout Building
<0.006
2,500 SF
PT-14
Brown on Louvers
Throughout Building
0.080
Intact
PT-15
Beige on Exterior
Concrete
Throughout Exterior
0.040
1,000 SF
Total
Estimated Removal
Costs
$1,000
$0
$0
$200
$500
$200
$200
$1,000
$1,000
$0
$0
$10,000
$14,700
Fire/Police
Sample
No.
Material Location

noted)
Lead Content
Approximate
Quantity*
Estimated Removal
Costs
$0
PT-1
1 Blue Ceramic Tile
Bathrooms
<0.0007
Intact
PT-2
White/Beige, on Drywall
Throughout Building
<0.006
800 SF
PT-3
Red on Exterior Trim
Throughout Building
0.058
150 SF
PT-4
Black and Red on

Windows and Doors
Throughout Building
<0.02
Intact
Total
$0
$1,000
$0
$1,000
Wright Hall
noted)
Approximate
Quantity*
Estimated Removal
Costs
Throughout Building
<0.006
Intact
$0
Orange/Black on
Structural Steel
Throughout Building
26
Intact
$0-100
White/Beige on Plaster
Throughout Building
0.18
14,400 SF
Sample
No.
PT-1
Beige/White on Drywall
PT-2
PT-3
Material Location
Lead Content
$57,600

UC Davis DCM
November 2013
Page 13 of 18
Sample
No.
PT-4
PT-5
Beige and Tan on

Exterior Concrete
Grey, Orange and
Brown on Doors and
Frames
Lead Content
noted)
Approximate
Quantity*
Throughout Building
0.12
500 SF
Throughout Building
7.0
Intact
Material Location
Estimated Removal
Costs
$1,000
$0
PT-6
Black on Stage Floor
Stage
<0.007
Intact
PT-7
Beige on Drywall
Throughout Building
<0.006
Intact
PT-8
Epoxy Floor
Bathrooms
0.002
500 SF
PT-9
Brown Ceramic Tile
Bathrooms
0.002
1,000 SF
PT-10
Tan Ceramic Tile
Bathrooms
0.0025
8,400 SF
Total
$0
$0
$1,500
$3,000
$25,200
$88,400
Olson Hall
Sample
No.
Material Location

noted)
Lead Content
Approximate
Quantity*
Estimated Removal
Costs
$12,800
PT-1
Ceramic Wall Tiles
Bathrooms
0.001
3,200 SF
PT-2
Ceramic Wall Tiles
Janitor Closets/Mech Rooms
0.053
700 SF
Throughout Building
0.46
200 SF
Throughout Building
0.39
1,000 SF
Tan Epoxy Flooring
South End of Second Floor
0.013
1,200 SF
PT-6-1
Lead Paint Debris
Throughout Building
0.035
11,400 SF
PT-6-2
Lead Paint Debris
Throughout Building
0.004
11,400 SF
Throughout Building
0.63
12,600 SF
Throughout Building
0.63
12,600 SF
Throughout Building
0.83
10,200 SF
Throughout Building
0.47
10,200 SF
<0.0006
N/A
PT-3
PT-4
PT-5
PT-7-1
PT-7-2
PT-8-1
PT-8-2
Brown, Green and Grey

on Doors and Frames
Beige and White on
Concrete
Grey, White, Beige and

Green on Plaster
Green on Plaster
Green on Concrete
Green on Concrete
$0
$400
$2,000
$6,000
$6,000
Included Above
$6,300
Included Above
$5,000
Included Above
PT-9
Ceramic Floor Tiles
Bathrooms
$0
PT-10
Green and Beige on

Exterior Trim
Throughout Building
0.63
50 SF
PT-11
Varnish on Handrails
Throughout Building
<40
N/A
$0
PT-12
Blue/Beige on Drywall
Throughout Building
<0.007
N/A
$0
$500

UC Davis DCM
November 2013
Page 14 of 18
Sample
No.
PT-13
PT-14
Green and White on
Ducts and Pipes
Silver and Orange on
Handrails
Lead Content
noted)
Approximate
Quantity*
Throughout Building
0.50
950 SF
Throughout Building
0.72
950 SF
Material Location
PT-15
Varnish on Doors
Throughout Building
0.005
50 SF
PT-16
White on Drywall
Throughout Building
<0.006
N/A
Total
Estimated Removal
Costs
$1,000
$5,000
$100
$0
$45,100
Of the fifty-five (55) samples collected, ten were reported to contain lead above 0.5%, 5,000 parts per million
(weight by weight), or 1.0 mg/cm2 which is the definition for lead based paint by the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) and the California Department of Public Health (DPH). Of the fifty-five samples taken forty-three
samples were found to have detectable amounts of lead. The OSHA Lead in Construction Standard requires the
use of special work practices during the disturbance of paint with any detectable amounts of lead. See attached
OSHA Lead Regulation Summary. Lead containing waste materials with a concentration greater than 0.1%, for
total lead, is considered hazardous waste in the State of California. Lead containing waste materials with a total lead
concentration between 0.005% (50 ppm) and 0.10% (1000 ppm) must be re-analyzed using the waste extraction test
(WET) method to determine the soluble lead content for waste disposal requirements.
The EPA Renovation, Repair and Painting Final Rule (40 CFR 745) requires that renovations conducted for
compensation (where lead-based paint will be disturbed), must be performed by Certified Firms using Certified
Renovators following the requirements set forth in the regulation.
Contractors are also required to notify the Division of Occupational Safety and Health (DOSH) prior to disturbing
greater than 100 square feet or l00 linear feet of material containing lead greater than 0.5% by weight, 5000 parts per
million (ppm) or 1.0 milligram per square centimeter (mg/cm2).
OSHA Lead Regulation Summary

The Federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), has enacted a lead standard, which was
adopted by the Cal/OSHA as 8 CCR 1532.1. The purpose of both standards is to protect construction workers
from exposure to lead. OSHA is primarily concerned with activities that disturb paints with any detectable
amounts of lead. Lead was used in most paints until the mid 1950s and was banned in amounts in excess of
0.06% by weight in 1978 for most non-industrial paints by the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC).
The Cal/OSHA standard requires contractors and employers to notify the State of California Division of
Occupational Safety and Health (DOSH) prior to disturbing greater than 100 square feet or 100 linear feet of
material containing lead greater than 0.5%, 5,000 parts per million (weight by weight), or 1.0 mg/cm2. The
Cal/OSHA standard also requires contractors and employers who perform paint removal activities to monitor their
employees to determine whether they are being exposed in excess of the action level of 30 micrograms per cubic
meter of air (g/m3) over an eight-hour time weighted average (TWA) or the Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL)
of 50 g/m3 TWA. Monitoring is performed by personal air sampling.

UC Davis DCM
November 2013
Page 15 of 18
Even when concentrations are below the action level, an employer must provide employees with High Efficiency
Particulate Air (HEPA) filtered vacuums, wetting agents and hand-washing facilities. If the exposure exceeds the
action level or the PEL, other procedures such as containing the area, local exhaust ventilation, respiratory and
worker protection, worker training, decontamination facilities and medical monitoring are required.
OSHA has identified several work practices that pose varying levels of lead exposure to laborers disturbing leadcontaining paint. Estimated exposure levels of lead are founded on the activity itself, rather than the
concentrations of lead present in paint. Therefore, as an example, paint that contains 0.5% versus 15% of lead by
weight or 0.8 mg/cm2 versus 3.5 mg/cm2 of lead in paint could pose the same exposure levels to workers
depending on the activities that cause the disturbance and the administrative and engineering controls that are
followed.
The following is a summary of work activities that disturb paint, the expected exposure and the respiratory
protection requirements that result as outlined in the OSHA standards:
Activities
Class I activities include: Manual demolition, manual
scraping, manual sanding, heat gun applications, general
cleanup, power tool cleaning with dust collection systems
and spray painting activities
Class II activities include: Using lead-containing mortars,
lead burning, lead riveting, rivet busting, power tool
cleaning without dust collection systems, cleanup of dry
expendable abrasives and abrasive blasting
Class III activities include: Abrasive blasting, welding,
cutting and torch burning on steel structures
Potential Exposure
Minimum Respiratory Protection
50 g/m3 to 500 g/m3
Half mask air purifying respirator equipped

with HEPA filters having a protection factor
of 10
500 g/m3 to 2,500 g/m3
Full face powered air purifying respirators

equipped with HEPA filters having a
protection factor of 100
Greater than 2,500 g/m3
Full face supplied air respirator operated in

pressure demand mode or other positive
pressure mode (type C)
P ol ych l ori nat ed Bi phen y ls (P C B) S a m pl in g

ACC conducted sampling of caulking typically suspected to contain Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs). The
samples were delivered to EMSL, an independent accredited laboratory for analysis by the EPA 8082 Method.
Copies of the laboratory results are attached for reference.
PCBs are mixtures of synthetic organic chemicals with the same basic chemical structure and similar physical
properties ranging from oily liquids to waxy solids. Due to their non-flammability, chemical stability, high boiling
point and electrical insulating properties, PCBs were used in hundreds of industrial and commercial applications
including electrical, heat transfer, and hydraulic equipment; as plasticizers in paints, plastics and rubber products;
in pigments, dyes and carbonless copy paper and many other applications. More than 1.5 billion pounds of PCBs
were manufactured in the United States prior to cessation of production in 1977.
PCBs have been demonstrated to cause a variety of adverse health effects, including cancer in animals. PCBs
have also been shown to cause a number of serious non-cancer health effects in animals, including effects on the
immune system, reproductive system, nervous system, endocrine system and other health effects. Studies in
humans provide supportive evidence for potential carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic effects of PCBs. The
different health effects of PCBs may be interrelated, as alterations in one system may have significant
implications for the other systems of the body.
The proper identification and handling of PCB-contaminated equipment and wastes is critical to the prevention of

UC Davis DCM
November 2013
Page 16 of 18
future waste management problems. All equipment or waste containing PCBs should be properly labeled, alerting
people to the requirement for special handling procedures. While procedures may vary depending on the industry
or specific operation, as a general rule, any time there is a risk of contact with PCBs, appropriate protective
equipment should be worn to limit contact with the skin and eyes and to protect against inhalation of PCB fumes.
Such equipment may include plastic or rubber gloves, boots, overalls, aprons, face shields or self-contained
breathing apparatus. For workers cleaning up a major spill containing high concentrations of PCBs, a full suit of
non-porous material should be worn. Clothing that has become contaminated should be disposed of along with
other PCB wastes. PCB manufacture, use, storage and disposal are regulated by U.S. EPA under TSCA and Part
761, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR Part 761). TSCA regulates any materials or wastes that
contain PCBs at concentrations of 50 ppm (parts per million) or greater. PCB wastes are also regulated as
hazardous waste by DTSC under the Health and Safety Code (HSC) and Title 22 of the California Code of
Regulations (22 CCR).
Criteria for determining PCB wastes are:
total threshold limit concentration (TTLC) of 50 ppm of PCBs, and/or
soluble threshold limit concentration (STLC) of 5 ppm of PCBs as oily liquid.
Summary of PCB Sampling Results
Building
Sample
No.
Grey Caulking Around
Windows and on Expansion
Joints
Tan Caulk on Top of Roof
Seams
PCB
Concentration
Approximate
Quantity*
Removal Cost
Estimate
22,000 ppm
2,800 LF
$9,000
Roof Area
860 ppm
800 LF
$2,400
Material Location
Olson
PCB-1
Olson
PCB-2
Med Sci
1B
PCB-3
Roof Wells on Stucco
Roof Wells
17 ppm
N/A
$0
Olson
PCB-4
Grey Window Putty
Rooftop Windows
9.8 ppm
N/A
$0
PCB-5
Beige/Tan Caulk
Around Windows and

Louvers
None Detected
N/A
$0
PCB-6
Grey Caulk
On CMU Wall
39,000 ppm
20 LF
$500
Total
$11,900
Central
Plant
Fire/Poli
ce
Throughout Building
(ppm unless otherwise

noted)
Other Hazardous Materials

ACC quantified the number of mercury containing light tubes; suspect PCB-containing ballasts and Mercury
thermostat switches as part of the scope of work. These materials and the quantities indicated below should be
Included in the hazardous materials removal scope of work or handled by properly trained workers of the
demolition contractor and segregated into specific waste streams prior to disturbance by general demolition
activities.

UC Davis DCM
November 2013
Page 17 of 18
Universal Waste/Other Hazardous Wastes
Estimated Quantity
Estimated Removal Costs
Florescent/Mercury Vapor Light Tubes
4,000 Each
$4,000
Suspect PCB-containing Light Ballasts in Building
2,000 Each
$8,000
275 Each
$1,000
Smoke Detectors
Limitations
ACC conducted the limited survey with the standard of care ordinarily exercised by qualified and reputable
members of the environmental/industrial hygiene profession based on conditions and practices observed at the
property and information provided to ACC related to the project and/or purpose of the survey at the time of the
investigation. The survey was limited to specific project areas and was not intended to identify all suspect
asbestos-containing materials within the building. Areas and materials not included in the survey should be
inspected and sampled prior to any renovation, maintenance, demolition or other activity that may cause
disturbance to the materials. This report does not intend to identify all hazards or unsafe practices, nor to indicate
that other hazards or unsafe conditions do not exist at the property.
ACC encountered the following inaccessible areas in addition to general concealed conditions (i.e. within wall
cavities, above/below solid ceilings or flooring/sub-flooring materials, etc.) and are excluded from the scope of
the survey. These areas should be inspected and any suspect materials and sampled accordingly prior to any
renovation, maintenance, demolition or other activity that may cause disturbance to the materials.
Inaccessible Areas
No inaccessible areas/equipment were identified within the provided project areas
Materials that would require intrusive or destructive sampling were generally not sampled as part of the project
unless written direction was provided to ACC to perform intrusive and/or destructive sampling on specific
building systems, the area was unoccupied at the time of the survey and by performing intrusive/destructive
sampling would not create an unsafe condition. Furthermore, ACC shall not be responsible for identifying and/or
sampling suspect materials concealed within walls, columns, beneath flooring, above solid ceilings, underground
or in any other concealed areas. ACC shall not be responsible for identification, sampling and/or characterization
of lead-containing materials, PCB and lighting/mercury wastes, and water or mold impacted materials. General
observations may be noted if ACC observed suspect conditions to the client either separately or within this report.
ACC excludes sampling concrete and asphalt paving as suspect asbestos-containing materials. Aggregate found in
these materials may contain asbestos if supplied from quarries located in known ultra-mafic areas. It is possible
that prior to recycling and/or disposal, recycling agents or landfills may require sampling of these materials to
determine the presence of asbestos prior to acceptance.
ACC excludes characterization of soils in areas on known ultramafic rock (where naturally occurring asbestos
may be found in soils) as part of the scope of work. If the project area is located within a known ultramafic rock
area, provisions should be made to address regulatory requirements for any planned excavation and grading as
part of the project. ACC can provide further detail on regulatory requirements related to naturally occurring
asbestos in soils.

UC Davis DCM
November 2013
Page 18 of 18
Quantities identified may not represent entire quantities of each material in the building based on the scope of the
survey.
The analyzing laboratory quantifies asbestos concentrations by calibrated visual estimation using standard PLM
methodology, with detection of asbestos is material/matrix dependent. Detection of trace asbestos (<1%) may not
be reliable or reproducible by PLM and percentage of asbestos weight cannot be determined with standard PLM
methodology. Confirmation of asbestos concentrations within complex matrices (i.e. plaster, gypsum
wallboard/taping/joint compounds, stucco, resilient flooring, roofing) or when asbestos concentrations are 1% or
less may warrant additional analysis by PLM point counting, gravimetric reduction or Transmission Electron
Microscopy for proper characterization of asbestos-containing materials and/or waste-stream analysis.
This report is prepared for the express use of University of California at Davis, its agents and employees. The
information in this report or portions thereof may be required to be included in notifications to employees,
occupants, contractors, vendors or other visitors to the building. This report is not intended to be used as a
specification or work plan for removal of asbestos-containing or other hazardous materials identified in the report
or for any work suggested by the report.
Please contact me at (510) 638-8400 ext. 111, should you have any questions on the findings.
Sincerely,
ACC ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, INC.
Chris Yama, CAC, CHMM, LEED AP

Senior Project Manager
Cal-OSHA Certified Asbestos Consultant (CAC #98-2356)
CDPH I-3814
CY/jpt
Attachments: Laboratory Reports
Final Report
Forensic Analytical Laboratories
Bulk Asbestos Analysis

(EPA Method 600/R-93-116, Visual Area Estimation)
ACC Environmental Consultants
Project Manager
7977 Capwell Dr., Suite 100
Client ID:
Report Number:
Date Received:
Date Analyzed:
Date Printed:
First Reported:
Oakland, CA 94621
Job ID/Site:
3028-066 - UC Davis Olson Hall, One Shields
Date(s) Collected:
Sample ID
Lab Number
PC-1-1
Layer: White/Black Plaster
Layer: Paint
11437681
ND
ND
ND
ND
Asbestos (ND)
11437684
ND
ND
ND
Total Composite Values of Fibrous Components:

Cellulose (40 %)
Fibrous Glass (10 %)
RM-2-2
Layer: Black Felt
Layer: Black Tar
Layer: White Foam
Asbestos (ND)
11437683

Cellulose (Trace)
RM-2-1
Layer: Black Felt
Layer: Black Tar
Layer: White Foam
Asbestos (ND)
11437682

Cellulose (Trace)
PC-1-3
Layer: Paint
Percent in
Layer
1117
FALI Job ID:
Total Samples Submitted: 5
Total Samples Analyzed: 5
Asbestos
Percent in
Asbestos
Percent in
Type
Layer
Type
Layer
ND
ND

Cellulose (Trace)
PC-1-2
Layer: Paint
Asbestos
Type
1117
B183049
10/14/13
10/14/13
10/15/13
10/15/13
Asbestos (ND)
11437685

Cellulose (40 %)
ND
ND
ND
Asbestos (ND)
1 of 2
3777 Depot Road, Suite 409, Hayward, CA 94545 / Telephone: (510) 887-8828 (800) 827-FASI / Fax: (510) 887-4218
Report Number:
Date Printed:
Client Name: ACC Environmental Consultants

Sample ID
Lab Number
Asbestos
Type
Percent in
Layer
Asbestos
Type
Percent in
Layer
B183049
10/15/13
Asbestos
Type
Percent in
Layer
Tad Thrower, Laboratory Supervisor, Hayward Laboratory

Note: Limit of Quantification ('LOQ') = 1%. 'Trace' denotes the presence of asbestos below the LOQ. 'ND' = 'None Detected'.
Analytical results and reports are generated by Forensic Analytical Laboratories Inc. (FALI) at the request of and for the exclusive use of the person or entity (client) named on such
report. Results, reports or copies of same will not be released by FALI to any third party without prior written request from client. This report applies only to the sample(s) tested.
Supporting laboratory documentation is available upon request. This report must not be reproduced except in full, unless approved by FALI. The client is solely responsible for the
use and interpretation of test results and reports requested from FALI. Forensic Analytical Laboratories Inc. is not able to assess the degree of hazard resulting from materials
analyzed. FALI reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal guidelines, unless otherwise specified. All samples were
received in acceptable condition unless otherwise noted.
2 of 2
Report Number:
Date Printed:
Client Name: ACC Environmental Consultants

Sample ID
Lab Number
JC-4-1
Layer: White Drywall
Layer: Off-White Joint Compound
Layer: Off-White Tape
Layer: Off-White Joint Compound
Layer: Paint
11437680

Cellulose (20 %)
Asbestos
Type
Percent in
Layer
Asbestos
Type
Percent in
Layer
B183048
10/15/13
Asbestos
Type
Percent in
Layer
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Asbestos (ND)

Note: Limit of Quantification ('LOQ') = 1%. 'Trace' denotes the presence of asbestos below the LOQ. 'ND' = 'None Detected'.
2 of 2
Final Report
Metals Analysis of Bulks

Project Manager
Client ID:
Report Number:
Date Received:
Date Analyzed:
Date Printed:
First Reported:
Oakland, CA 94621
Job ID / Site: 3028-066.00, UC Davis, Olson Hall + Med Sci 1B
Date(s) Collected:
Sample Number
PT-2
1117
M143755
10/14/13
10/15/13
10/15/13
10/15/13
1117
FALI Job ID:
Lab Number
Analyte
Result
Result
Units
Reporting
Limit*
Method
Reference
30661847
Pb
24
mg/kg
EPA 3050B/7420
* The Reporting Limit represents the lowest amount of analyte that the laboratory can confidently detect in the sample, and is not a
regulatory level. The Units for the Reporting Limit are the same as the Units for the Final Results.
Daniele Siu, Laboratory Supervisor, Hayward Laboratory

Analytical results and reports are generated by Forensic Analytical at the request of and for the exclusive use of the person or entity (client) named on such report. Results,
reports or copies of same will not be released by Forensic Analytical to any third party without prior written request from client. This report applies only to the sample(s)
tested. Supporting laboratory documentation is available upon request. This report must not be reproduced except in full, unless approved by Forensic Analytical. The client
is solely responsible for the use and interpretation of test results and reports requested from Forensic Analytical. Forensic Analytical is not able to assess the degree of hazard
resulting from materials analyzed. Forensic Analytical reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of thirty (30) days, according to all state and federal
guidelines, unless otherwise specified. Any modifications that have been made to referenced test methods are documented in Forensic Analytical's Standard Operating
Procedures Manual. Sample results have not been blank corrected. Quality control and sample receipt condition were acceptable unless otherwise noted.
1 of 1
Final Report
Metals Analysis of Paints

Project Manager
Client ID:
Report Number:
Date Received:
Date Analyzed:
Date Printed:
First Reported:
Oakland, CA 94621
Job ID / Site: 3028-066.00, UC Davis, Olson Hall + Med Sci 1B
Date(s) Collected:
Sample Number
PT-1
1117
M143754
10/14/13
10/15/13
10/15/13
10/15/13
1117
FALI Job ID:
Lab Number
Analyte
Result
Result
Units
Reporting
Limit*
Method
Reference
30661846
Pb
0.079
wt%
0.006
EPA 3050B/7420

1 of 1
Final Report
Bulk Asbestos Point Count Analysis

(NESHAP Final Rule, 40 CFR, Part 61)

Project Manager
Client ID:
Report Number:
Date Received:
Date Analyzed:
Date Printed:
Oakland, CA 94621
Job ID/Site:
3028-067 - UC Davis, Olson Hall, One Shields
PLM Report Number: B184568
1117
N005877
11/19/13
11/22/13
11/22/13
1117
FALI Job ID:
Total Samples Submitted:
Total Samples Analyzed:
Sample Preparation and Analysis:

The NESHAP Final Rule does not define the preparation method for multi-layered samples. In order to determine the composite quantity of
asbestos, the volume percent of each layer is determined, the asbestos containing layers are analyzed by point counting and the composite quantity of
asbestos is calculated. The NESHAP Final Rule can not be applied to matrices that dissolve in refractive index liquid. This includes tar, mastic or
adhesive typically found on the back of floor tiles. According to the NESHAP Final Rule, point count data is only necessary when the visual estimate
of asbestos is below 10%.
Sample ID
Lab Number
Layer Description
JC-34-1
11452696
Composite of ALL Layers

White Drywall
Beige Joint Compound
Paint
Point Count Results:

Number of asbestos points counted:
Number of non-empty points:
Layer percentage of entire sample:
Percent asbestos in layer:
Asbestos type(s) detected:
0
400
100
<1
Chrysotile
Composite percentage of asbestos in entire sample: <1.0

Comment: Asbestos was detected but no points were counted due to counting criteria. Therefore quantitation deemed to
be < 1%.
Note: Point count results are reported to the nearest percent per EPA method.

Note: Limit of Quantification (LOQ) = 1%. Trace denotes the presence of asbestos below the LOQ. ND = None Detected.
1 of 1
1
1
Final Report
Metals Analysis of Bulks

Project Manager
Client ID:
Report Number:
Date Received:
Date Analyzed:
Date Printed:
First Reported:
Oakland, CA 94621
Job ID / Site: 3028-067, UC Davis, Olson Hall, One Shields
Date(s) Collected:
1117
M144805
11/19/13
11/20/13
11/20/13
11/20/13
1117
FALI Job ID:
Lab Number
Analyte
Result
Result
Units
Reporting
Limit*
Method
Reference
PT-1
30665380
Pb
10
mg/kg
EPA 3050B/7420
PT-2
30665381
Pb
530
mg/kg
30
EPA 3050B/7420
PT-6-2
30665382
Pb
39
mg/kg
EPA 3050B/7420
PT-9
30665383
Pb
<6
mg/kg
EPA 3050B/7420
PT-11
30665384
Pb
< 40
mg/kg
40
EPA 3050B/7420
55
mg/kg
EPA 3050B/7420
Sample Number
Comment:
PT-15
Insufficient sample size for repeatable analysis.

30665385
Pb

1 of 1
Final Report
Metals Analysis of Paints

Project Manager
Client ID:
Report Number:
Date Received:
Date Analyzed:
Date Printed:
First Reported:
Oakland, CA 94621
Job ID / Site: 3028-067, UC Davis, Olson Hall, One Shields
Date(s) Collected:
1117
M144804
11/19/13
11/22/13
11/22/13
11/22/13
1117
FALI Job ID:
Lab Number
Analyte
Result
Result
Units
Reporting
Limit*
Method
Reference
PT-3
30665367
Pb
0.46
wt%
0.03
EPA 3050B/7420
PT-4
30665368
Pb
0.39
wt%
0.02
EPA 3050B/7420
PT-5
30665369
Pb
0.013
wt%
0.007
EPA 3050B/7420
PT-6-1
30665370
Pb
0.035
wt%
0.006
EPA 3050B/7420
PT-4-1
30665371
Pb
< 0.007
wt%
0.007
EPA 3050B/7420
PT-7-2
30665372
Pb
0.63
wt%
0.03
EPA 3050B/7420
PT-8-1
30665373
Pb
0.83
wt%
0.07
EPA 3050B/7420
PT-8-2
30665374
Pb
0.47
wt%
0.04
EPA 3050B/7420
PT-10
30665375
Pb
0.63
wt%
0.03
EPA 3050B/7420
PT-12
30665376
Pb
< 0.007
wt%
0.007
EPA 3050B/7420
PT-13
30665377
Pb
0.50
wt%
0.03
EPA 3050B/7420
PT-14
30665378
Pb
0.72
wt%
0.04
EPA 3050B/7420
PT-16
30665379
Pb
< 0.006
wt%
0.006
EPA 3050B/7420
Sample Number

1 of 1
February 26, 2014

Ms. Debra Smith
University of California at Davis
Design & Construction Management
255 Cousteau Place
Davis, CA 95618
Re:
Transmitted electronically: dlsmith@ucdavis.edu
Comprehensive Hazardous Materials Survey for the Planned Renovation/Demolition Project

University of California at Davis. Haring Hall
One Shields Avenue, Davis, California
ACC Project No. 3028-068.00
Dear Ms. Smith:

Per your request, ACC Environmental Consultants, Inc. (ACC) performed a comprehensive asbestos and lead
paint survey of the above referenced site from January 13th 2014 through February 7th 2014. The survey of the
site was performed to identify suspect asbestos-containing building materials, loose & peeling lead-containing
paint, mercury light tubes, mercury thermostat switches, PCB-light ballasts, and PCB caulkings that may be
impacted during the planned Renovation/Demolition project. Common suspect asbestos-containing building
materials that may be impacted by typical renovation/demolition projects may include but are not limited to, the
following materials:
Roofing Materials
Reflective Paint
Boiler Insulation
Pipe Insulation, Elbows & Fittings
Duct Insulation
Mudded Duct Joints
Vibration/Expansion Joints
Asbestos-cement Piping/Flues
Flooring Materials and Associated Adhesive
Baseboard and Baseboard Adhesive
Carpet Adhesive
Leveling Compound
Wall Materials
Drywall and Joint Compound
Texturing Compound
Ceiling Tile
Plaster Walls/Ceilings
Above Ceiling Materials
Exterior Stucco
ACC conducted the survey of the building according to the scope of work as outlined in the proposal dated
December 8, 2013. Building components not associated with the planned Renovation/Demolition project were not
Northern California: 7977 Capwell Drive, Suite 100 Oakland, CA 94621 (510) 638-8400 Fax (510) 638-8404
Southern California: 1055 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1450, Los Angeles, CA 90017 (213) 353-1240 Fax (213) 353-1244
UC Davis Haring Hall; Comprehensive Hazardous Materials Survey

Ms. Debra Smith UCD Design & Construction Management
February 26, 2014
Page 2 of 19
sampled. Furthermore, lead sampling was conducted to identify suspect lead-containing coatings that may be
disturbed by project activities for the purpose of compliance with Cal-OSHAs Lead in Construction Standard and
is not intended to be a Lead Inspection or Lead Risk Assessment as defined by the California Department of
Public Health (CDPH).
ACC did not conduct destructive sampling (i.e. opening wall cavities, removal of sub-floor assemblies, etc.) and
as such, if any planned renovation, maintenance or demolition activities will impact concealed materials,
additional investigation and sampling should be conducted prior to disturbance of these systems.
Asbestos Bulk Sample Results

Mr. Chris Yama, a Certified Asbestos Consultant (#98-2356) with ACC, performed bulk sampling of suspect
asbestos-containing materials from January 13th 2014 through February 7th 2014. One hundred ninety two
samples of suspect materials were submitted for analysis. Copies of the laboratory results are attached.
The samples were delivered to Forensic Analytical Laboratories, of Hayward, California, an independent
laboratory that participates in the bulk sample proficiency analysis program conducted by the United States
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and is accredited by the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation
Program (NVLAP). The samples were analyzed using Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) with dispersion
staining to estimate percent composition by volume. Samples with less than 1% (<1%) asbestos are designated as
Trace asbestos. Samples with no observable asbestiform minerals are designated as no asbestos detected.
Summary of Asbestos Bulk Sample Results
Sample
No.
Material Location
RM-1-1
Membrane Roofing and

Remnant Tar
East Wing North and South
RM-2-1

Remnant Tar
Southwest Corner Roof
RM-3-1

Remnant Tar
Southwest Middle Roof
RM-4-1

Remnant Tar
Southwest Upper Roof
Results
Non-Fibrous: No
Asbestos Detected
Tar: No Asbestos
Detected
Felt: No Asbestos
Detected
Foam: No Asbestos
Detected
Non-Fibrous: No
Asbestos Detected
Tar: No Asbestos
Detected
Foam: No Asbestos
Detected
Non-Fibrous: No
Asbestos Detected
Tar: No Asbestos
Detected
Foam: No Asbestos
Detected
Non-Fibrous: No
Asbestos Detected
Tar: No Asbestos
Detected
Felt: No Asbestos
Detected
Foam: No Asbestos
Detected
Approx.
Quantity*
NESHAPS
Category1
OSHA
Class2
N/Q
N/A
N/A
N/Q
N/A
N/A
N/Q
N/A
N/A
N/Q
N/A
N/A

February 26, 2014
Page 3 of 19
Sample
No.
Material Location
RM-5-1

Remnant Tar
Northwest Middle Roof
RM-6-1

Remnant Tar
Northwest Lower Roof
RM-7-1 &
2
Membrane Roof over Builtup Roof
Northwest Upper Roof
JC-8-1, 2,
3, 4, 5, 6,
&7
Gypsum Wallboard and

Taping Compound
Throughout Building
PL-9-1, 2,
3, 4, 5, 6,
7
Plaster
Throughout Building
ES-10-1,
2, 3, 4, &
5
Exterior Stucco
West Wing North
Results
Non-Fibrous: No
Asbestos Detected
Tar: No Asbestos
Detected
Foam: No Asbestos
Detected
Cementitious: No
Asbestos Detected
Non-Fibrous: No
Asbestos Detected
Tar: No Asbestos
Detected
Felt: No Asbestos
Detected
Foam: No Asbestos
Detected
Cementitious: No
Asbestos Detected
Semi-Fibrous: No
Asbestos Detected
Silver Paint: No Asbestos
Detected
Tar: No Asbestos
Detected
Felt: No Asbestos
Detected
Drywall: No Asbestos
Detected
Joint Compound: 2%
Chrysotile Asbestos
Paint: No Asbestos
Detected
By PLM 400 Point
Count Analysis: <1.0%
Chrysotile Asbestos
Gray Plaster: No
Asbestos Detected
White Plaster: No
Asbestos Detected
Paint: No Asbestos
Detected
Gray Cementitious: No
Asbestos Detected
Brown Cementitious:
No Asbestos Detected
Beige Cementitious: No
Asbestos Detected
Non-Fibrous: Trace
(<1%) Chrysotile
Asbestos
Paint: No Asbestos
Detected
By PLM 400 Point
Chrysotile Asbestos
Approx.
Quantity*
NESHAPS
Category1
OSHA
Class2
N/Q
N/A
N/A
N/Q
N/A
N/A
N/Q
N/A
N/A
125,000 SF
Friable
Class 2
N/Q
N/A
N/A
2,200 SF
Category II
Class 2

February 26, 2014
Page 4 of 19
Sample
No.
Material Location
MI-11-1,
2, 3, 4, 5,
6, & 7
Exterior Concrete and

Paint/Texture
Throughout Exterior
ES-12-1,
2, 3, 4, &
5
Exterior Stucco
Throughout Exterior
FA-13-1
9x9 Black Floor Tile

and Black Adhesive
Throughout Building
FA-14-1,
2, & 3
9x9 Tan Floor Tile and

Black Adhesive
Throughout Building
CT-15-1,
&2
1x1 Large Preformation

Ceiling Tile with Brown
Adhesive
Halls and Various Rooms
CT-16-1
2x2 Ceiling Tile
Room 1006
CT-17-1,
&2
1x1 Ceiling Tile with Small

Fissures and Brown
Adhesive
West Wing North
CT-18-1
1x1 Ceiling Tile with

Pinholes and Beige &
Brown Adhesive
Large Classroom
CM-19-1
Brown Ceiling Tile

Adhesive
Room 1310A
CM-20-1
Beige Ceiling Tile Adhesive
Room 1310A
Results
Cementitious: No
Asbestos Detected
Paint: No Asbestos
Detected
Cementitious: No
Asbestos Detected
Non-Fibrous: Trace
(<1%) Chrysotile
Asbestos
Paint: No Asbestos
Detected
By PLM 400 Point
Chrysotile Asbestos
Tile: 2% Chrysotile
Asbestos
Mastic: 5% Chrysotile
Asbestos
Tan Tile: 2% Chrysotile
Asbestos
Black Mastic: No
Asbestos Detected
Adhesive: No Asbestos
Detected
Fibrous: No Asbestos
Detected
Paint: No Asbestos
Detected
Detected
Paint: No Asbestos
Detected
Detected
Detected
Paint: No Asbestos
Detected
Detected
Detected
Paint: No Asbestos
Detected
Detected
Cementitious: No
Asbestos Detected
Cementitious: No
Asbestos Detected
Detected
Paint: No Asbestos
Detected
Detected
Approx.
Quantity*
NESHAPS
Category1
OSHA
Class2
N/Q
N/A
N/A
4,500 SF
Category II
Class 2
79,400 SF
Category I
Class 2
4,300 SF
Category I
Class 2
N/Q
N/A
N/A
N/Q
N/A
N/A
N/Q
N/A
N/A
N/Q
N/A
N/A
N/Q
N/A
N/A
N/Q
N/A
N/A

February 26, 2014
Page 5 of 19
Sample
No.
Material Location
CT-21-1
1x1 Ceiling Tile with

Fissures and Brown
Adhesive
Rooms 1016, 1014
CT-22-1
1x1 Ceiling Tile with Small

Fissures
Throughout Building
CT-23-1
&2
2x4 Ceiling Tile Large

Fissures
Throughout Building
CT-24-1
2x4 Ceiling Tile Small

Fissures
Throughout Building
CT-25-1
2x4 Solid Ceiling Tile on

Drywall
Room 1241 Lockers
CT-27-1
&2
1x1 Large Fissure Ceiling

Tile and Brown Adhesive
East Lobby
CT-28-1
&2
1x1 Fissured Ceiling Tile

and Brown Adhesive
West Wing South
MI-29-1,
2, & 3
Concrete Slab
Throughout Building
TI-30-1 &
2
Tank Insulation (new)
1st Floor Center Mechanical Room
TI-31-1,
2, & 3
Tank Insulation
1st Floor Center Mechanical Room
DI-32-1 &
2
HVAC Duct Insulation,

Fiberglass with Black Paper
Throughout Building
DI-33-1 &
2

Silver Tar and Felt and
Cork
Throughout Building, Concealed

in some Locations.
DI-34-1,
2, & 3
HVAC Duct Insulation Air

Cell

in some Locations.
Results
Detected
Detected
Paint: No Asbestos
Detected
Detected
Detected
Paint: No Asbestos
Detected
Detected
Paint: No Asbestos
Detected
Detected
Paint: No Asbestos
Detected
Detected
Detected
Paint: No Asbestos
Detected
Detected
Fibrous Tile: No
Asbestos Detected
Paint: No Asbestos
Detected
Detected
Fibrous Tile: No
Asbestos Detected
Paint: No Asbestos
Detected
Cementitious: No
Asbestos Detected
Paint: No Asbestos
Detected
Semi-Fibrous: No
Asbestos Detected
Semi-Fibrous: 10%
Chrysotile Asbestos;
10% Amosite Asbestos
Tan Fibrous: No
Asbestos Detected
Yellow Fibrous: No
Asbestos Detected
Black Fibrous: No
Asbestos Detected
Semi-Fibrous Tar: 15%
Chrysotile Asbestos
Silver Non-Fibrous: No
Asbestos Detected
Fibrous: 80%
Chrysotile Asbestos
Approx.
Quantity*
NESHAPS
Category1
OSHA
Class2
N/Q
N/A
N/A
N/Q
N/A
N/A
N/Q
N/A
N/A
N/Q
N/A
N/A
N/Q
N/A
N/A
N/Q
N/A
N/A
N/Q
N/A
N/A
N/Q
N/A
N/A
N/Q
N/A
N/A
350 SF
Friable
Class 1
N/Q
N/A
N/A
7,500 SF
Friable
Class 1
17,400 SF
Friable
Class 1

February 26, 2014
Page 6 of 19
Sample
No.
Material Location
PI-35-1,
2, & 3
Pipe Insulation Hardpack

in some Locations.
PI-36-1,
2, & 3
Pipe Insulation, Black Tar

and Cork

in some Locations.
PE-37-1,
2, & 3
Pipe Elbows

in some Locations.
DB-38-1,
&2
Above Ceiling Debris
Throughout Building
DB-39-1
&2
Debris, Crawl Space
Throughout Crawl Space
DB-40-1
&2
Debris, Mechanical
Rooms
Throughout Building
WT-41-1,
2, 3
Wall Texture on Gypsum

Wallboard
Room 1227 B
TG-42-1
&2
Tile Grout for Tan Ceramic

Tile
Bathrooms and Labs
MI-43-1 &
2
Spaghetti Board and Felt
Central Wing East
CK-44-1
&2
Beige/Gray Caulking
Exterior Windows
SK-45-1
Brown Sink Undercoating
Room 2149
SK-46-1
White Sink Undercoating
Room 2152
SK-47-1
Black Sink Undercoating
Room 2170
Results
Semi-Fibrous: 10%
Black Tar: No Asbestos
Detected
Fibrous: 80%
Chrysotile Asbestos
Paint: No Asbestos
Detected
Beige Semi-Fibrous: No
Asbestos Detected
White Semi-Fibrous:
7% Chrysotile
Asbestos;
Semi-Fibrous: 10%
Amosite Asbestos;
5% Chrysotile
Asbestos
Semi-Fibrous: 5%
Paint: No Asbestos
Detected
Semi-Fibrous: 7%
Non-Fibrous: No
Asbestos Detected
Detected
Texture: No Asbestos
Detected
Paint: No Asbestos
Detected
Ceramic Tile: No
Asbestos Detected
Gray Grout: No Asbestos
Detected
Off-White Grout: No
Asbestos Detected
Black Tar: No Asbestos
Detected
Black Felt: No Asbestos
Detected
Semi-Fibrous: 3%
Chrysotile Asbestos
Paint: No Asbestos
Detected
Non-Fibrous: 2%
Chrysotile Asbestos
Non-Fibrous: 5%
Chrysotile Asbestos
Non-Fibrous: Trace
(<1%) Chrysotile
Asbestos
Approx.
Quantity*
NESHAPS
Category1
OSHA
Class2
35,400 LF
Friable
Class 1
9,400 LF
Friable
Class 1
2,500 Each
Friable
Class 1
33,700 SF
Friable
Class 1
74,700 SF
Friable
Class 1
12,900 SF
Friable
Class 1
N/Q
N/A
N/A
N/Q
N/A
N/A
N/Q
N/A
N/A
22,500 LF
Category II
Class 2
50 Each
Category II
Class 2
44 Each
Category II
Class 2
370 Each
Category II
Class 2

February 26, 2014
Page 7 of 19
Sample
No.
SK-48-1
Black Tar Paper Under

Sink
Room 1227C
MI-49-1
Gray Epoxy Flooring
Room 1131
MI-50-1
Freezer Insulation Cork

and Tar
Throughout Building
MI-51-1
Tan Epoxy Floor
Room 1322
MI-52-1 &
2
Brown Epoxy Floor
Room 1227C
MI-53-1,
2, & 3
Transite Sinks and

Air/Gas Boxes
Throughout Building
MI-54-1
Duct Mastic on Fume Vents
Room 1070
MI-55-1
Chalkboards
Throughout Building
TF-56-1
2 Diameter Asbestos
Cement (Transite) Flues
From First Floor through Roof,

Throughout Building
DI-57-1
Air Handler Duct

Insulation Fibrous.
Fiberglass Appearance
Roof
MI-58-1 &
2
Grout on Exterior Stone
East Entry
CK-59-1
Gray Caulking
West Wing New
MI-60-1
Gray Vinyl Lab Tabletop
Room 1047
MI-61-1 &
2
Gray Solid Lab Tabletop
Rooms 1097, 2116
MI-62-1 &
2
Black Laminate Thin Lab

Table
Throughout Building
MI-63-1,
2, 3, 4, 5,
&6
Black Solid Lab Tabletop
Throughout Building
Material Location
Results
Detected
Semi-Fibrous: 10%
Chrysotile Asbestos
Cementitious: No
Asbestos Detected
Silver Paint: No
Asbestos Detected
Cementitious Tar: 2%
Chrysotile Asbestos
Non-Fibrous: No
Asbestos Detected
Cementitious: No
Asbestos detected
Non-Fibrous: No
Asbestos
Cementitious: No
Asbestos Detected
Semi-Fibrous: 15%
Chrysotile Asbestos
Non-Fibrous: No
Asbestos Detected
Non-Fibrous:
Paint: No Asbestos
Detected
Semi-Fibrous: 7%
3% Amosite Asbestos
Semi-Fibrous: 15%
10% Crocidolite
Asbestos
Semi-Fibrous: 50%
Detected
Cementitious: No
Asbestos Detected
Paint: No Asbestos
Detected
Non-Fibrous: No
Asbestos Detected
Light Gray Non-Fibrous:
Gray Non-Fibrous: No
Asbestos Detected
Non-Fibrous: No
Asbestos Detected
Black Coating: No
Asbestos Detected
Detected
Mastic: No Asbestos
Detected
Non-Fibrous: No
Asbestos Detected
Semi-Fibrous: 15%
Chrysotile Asbestos
Approx.
Quantity*
NESHAPS
Category1
OSHA
Class2
3 Each
Category II
Class 2
N/Q
N/A
N/A
18,350 SF
Category II
Class 2
N/Q
N/A
N/A
N/Q
N/A
N/A
1,230 Each
Category II
Class 2
N/Q
N/A
N/A
3,250 SF
Category II
Class 2
4,400 LF
Category II
Class 2
1,200 SF
Friable
Class 1
N/Q
N/A
N/A
N/Q
N/A
N/A
N/Q
N/A
N/A
N/Q
N/A
N/A
N/Q
N/A
N/A
25,500 SF
Category II
Class 2

February 26, 2014
Page 8 of 19
Sample
No.
Material Location
MI-64-1 &
2
CK-65-1
&2
Black Lab Table Top,

Thick Laminate
Gray Caulking at Interior
Windows
BA-66-1
&2
Brown/Beige Baseboard
Adhesive
Rooms 1310A, 2149
BA-67-1
&2
Brown Baseboard
Adhesive
Throughout Building
BA-68-1
&2
Beige Baseboard Adhesive
Hall 1st and 2nd Floors
BA-69-1
Yellow Baseboard
Adhesive
Room 1330F
LN-70-1
&2
Tan Marble Linoleum and

Yellow Adhesive
2nd Floor Store Lab Rooms 2125 and

2137
SV-71-1
&2
Green Pebble Pattern

Sheet Vinyl Flooring
Rooms 1139, 1342
FA-72-1
&2
12x12 Gray Floor Tile

and Black Adhesive
Room 2216
TG-73-1
&2
Tile Grout for Ceramic Floor

Tile
Room 2067, Bathroom Cen Wing
FA-74-1
&2
9x9 Brown Floor Tile and

Black Adhesive
Room 1024
FA-75-1
&2
12x12 Beige Floor Tile

and Black Adhesive, on
Wood
Large Classroom (Room 1310A)

and Hallway
LN-76-1
&2
Tan Marble Sheet Vinyl

Flooring with Black
Adhesive
Throughout Building
LN-77-1
&2
Tan Marble Linoleum over

Black Tar
Large Classroom Central Wing
Throughout Building
Rooms 2126, 2166
Results
Semi-Fibrous: 20%
Chrysotile Asbestos
Non-Fibrous: No
Asbestos Detected
Non-Fibrous: No
Asbestos Detected
Off-White Mastic: No
Asbestos Detected
Brown Mastic: No
Asbestos Detected
Yellow Mastic: No
Asbestos Detected
Non-Fibrous: No
Asbestos Detected
Mastic: Trace (<1%)
Chrysotile Asbestos
Mastic: No Asbestos
Detected
Mastic: No Asbestos
Detected
Sheet Flooring: No
Asbestos Detected
Mastic: No Asbestos
Detected
Sheet Flooring: No
Asbestos Detected
Fibrous Backing: 70%
Chrysotile Asbestos
Tile: No Asbestos
Detected
Black Mastic: 3%
Chrysotile Asbestos
Ceramic Tile: No
Asbestos Detected
Grout: No Asbestos
Detected
Tile: No Asbestos
Detected
Mastic: No Asbestos
Detected
Yellow Mastic: No
Asbestos Detected
Tile: No Asbestos
Detected
Black Mastic: 2%
Chrysotile Asbestos
Sheet Flooring: No
Asbestos Detected
Asbestos
Sheet Flooring: No
Asbestos Detected
Asbestos
Cementitious Tar:
Trace (<1%) Chrysotile
Asbestos
Approx.
Quantity*
NESHAPS
Category1
OSHA
Class2
12,400 SF
Category II
Class 2
N/Q
N/A
N/A
N/Q
N/A
N/A
11,900 LF
Category II
Class 2
N/Q
N/A
N/A
N/Q
N/A
N/A
N/Q
N/A
N/A
700 SF
Friable
Class 2
480 SF
Category I
Class 2
N/Q
N/A
N/A
N/Q
N/A
N/A
2,400 SF
Category I
Class 2
2,400 SF
Category I
Class 2
3,200 SF
Category I
Class 2

February 26, 2014
Page 9 of 19
Sample
No.
Material Location
FA-78-1
&2
12x12 Green Floor Tile

and Yellow Adhesive
Room 1204
SV-79-1
Tan Pebble Sheet Vinyl

Flooring
Elevator
LN-80-1
&2
Tan Marble Linoleum over

Brown Epoxy
See MI-52 West Wing
SV-81-1
&2

Flooring over 9x 9 Tile
Throughout Building
AD-82-1
&2
Black Mastic for 9x 9

Tiles
Throughout Building
FA-83-1
&2

and Yellow Adhesive
Rooms 1131, 1227
CA-84-1
&2
Yellow Carpet Adhesive
Rooms 1211, 1310A
FA-85-1,
2, & 3

and Black Adhesive
Throughout Building
LN-86-1
&2
Green Linoleum
Throughout Building
SV-87-1

Flooring over Green
Linoleum
Room 1078
Results
Tile: No Asbestos
Detected
Mastic: No Asbestos
Detected
Sheet Flooring: No
Asbestos Detected
Fibrous Backing: No
Asbestos Detected
Mastic: No Asbestos
Detected
Sheet Flooring: No
Asbestos Detected
Mastic: No Asbestos
Detected
Sheet Flooring: No
Asbestos Detected
Fibrous Backing: No
Asbestos Detected
Tile: 5% Chrysotile
Asbestos
Asbestos
Tile Debris: 5%
Chrysotile Asbestos
Black Mastic: 10%
Chrysotile Asbestos
Tile: No Asbestos
Detected
Mastic: No Asbestos
Detected
Mastic: No Asbestos
Detected
Tile: No Asbestos
Detected
Black Mastic: 5%
Chrysotile Asbestos
Sheet Flooring: No
Asbestos Detected
Woven: No Asbestos
Detected
Mastic: No Asbestos
Detected
Off-White Sheet Flooring:
Fibrous Backing: No
Asbestos Detected
Mastic: No Asbestos
Detected
Green Sheet Flooring:
Woven: No Asbestos
Detected
Approx.
Quantity*
NESHAPS
Category1
OSHA
Class2
N/Q
N/A
N/A
N/Q
N/A
N/A
N/Q
N/A
N/A
3,200 SF
Friable
Class 2
30,200 SF
Category II
Class 2
N/Q
N/A
N/A
N/Q
N/A
N/A
34,100 SF
Category I
Class 2
N/Q
N/A
N/A
N/Q
N/A
N/A

February 26, 2014
Page 10 of 19
Sample
No.
Material Location
FA-88-1,
2, & 3

over 9x 9 Black Floor
Tile
Throughout Building
DT-89-1
Canvas Duct Tape
Throughout Building
MI-90-1,
2, 3, 4, 5,
6, & 7
Concrete and Paint/Texture

on Interior Stairwells
Throughout Building
FD-91
Fire Doors
Throughout Building
Results
Off-White Tile: No
Asbestos Detected
Yellow Mastic: No
Asbestos Detected
Black Tile: 5%
Chrysotile Asbestos
Black Mastic: 10%
Chrysotile Asbestos
Tan Tile: 7% Chrysotile
Asbestos
White Tape: No Asbestos
Detected
Cementitious: No
Asbestos Detected
Paint: No Asbestos
Detected
Assumed Asbestos
Approx.
Quantity*
NESHAPS
Category1
OSHA
Class2
22,600 SF
Category I
Class 2
N/Q
N/A
N/A
N/Q
N/A
N/A
325 Each
Friable
Class 2
Fume Hoods with

Throughout Building
Assumed Asbestos
225 Each
Category II
Class 2
Transite
Mastic and Felt around
MI-93
Freezer/Refrigeration
Throughout Building
Assumed Asbestos
8,000 SF
Category II
Class 2
Units
MI-92
EPAs NESHAPS regulations define categories of asbestos-containing materials (ACM) based on their potential of asbestos fiber release
when disturbed:
Friable - Any material containing more than 1 percent asbestos that, when dry, can be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to
Category I Non-friable ACM (Cat 1 NF) - Asbestos-containing packings, gaskets, resilient floor covering and asphalt roofing
products containing more than 1 percent asbestos.
Category II Non-friable ACM (Cat II NF) - Any material, excluding Category I non-friable ACM containing more than 1 percent
asbestos as determined using the methods specified under AHERA, when dry, cannot be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to
2
OSHAs Asbestos in Construction Standard (Federal - 29 CFR 1910.126 and California 8 CCR 1529) define specific Classes of work
based on the risk of exposure to employees with the potential for disturbance of asbestos-containing materials. The classes of work are
defined as
Class 1 - Asbestos-related activities involving the removal of thermal systems insulation (TSI) and surfacing ACM or presumed
ACM.
Class 2 - Asbestos-related activities involving the removal of ACM which are not TSI or surfacing ACM.
Summary of Asbestos Materials

Building
Haring Hall
Gypsum Wallboard
and Taping
Compound
Throughout Building
Haring Hall
Exterior Stucco
West Wing North
Results
Asbestos
By PLM 400 Point Count Analysis:
<1.0% Chrysotile Asbestos
Gray Cementitious: No Asbestos
Detected
Brown Cementitious: No Asbestos
Approx.
Quantity*
Cost
Estimate
125,000
SF
$375,000
2,200 SF
$11,000

February 26, 2014
Page 11 of 19
Building
Results
Approx.
Quantity*
Cost
Estimate
4,500 SF
$22,500
79,400
SF
$160,000
4,300 SF
$8,600
350 SF
$1,000
7,500 SF
$37,500
17,400
SF
$87,500
35,400 LF
$354,000
9,400 LF
$50,000
2,500
Each
$25,000
33,700
SF
$33,700
74,700
SF
$150,000
12,900
SF
$13,000
22,500 LF
$45,000
Detected
Beige Cementitious: No Asbestos
Detected
Non-Fibrous: Trace (<1%) Chrysotile
Asbestos
Haring Hall
Exterior Stucco
Haring Hall
Haring Hall
9x9 Black Floor Tile

and Black Adhesive
9x9 Tan Floor Tile
and Black Adhesive
Haring Hall
Haring Hall
Haring Hall
Haring Hall
Haring Hall
Throughout Exterior
Throughout Building
Throughout Building
Tank Insulation
1st Floor Center

Mechanical Room

Silver Tar and Felt
and Cork
Concealed in some
Locations.
HVAC Duct Insulation

Air Cell
Pipe Insulation
Hardpack
Pipe Insulation, Black
Tar and Cork
Concealed in some
Locations.
Concealed in some
Locations.
Concealed in some
Locations.
Haring Hall
Haring Hall
Pipe Elbows
Concealed in some
Locations.
Above Ceiling Debris
Throughout Building
Debris, Crawl Space
Throughout Crawl
Space
Debris, Mechanical
Rooms
Throughout Building
Beige/Gray Caulking
Exterior Windows
Haring Hall
Haring Hall
Haring Hall
Haring Hall
Haring Hall
Haring Hall
Brown Sink
Undercoating
White Sink
Undercoating
Black Sink
Undercoating

Cementitious: No Asbestos Detected
Asbestos
Tan Tile: 2% Chrysotile Asbestos
Black Mastic: No Asbestos Detected
Semi-Fibrous: 10% Chrysotile
Asbestos;
Semi-Fibrous Tar: 15% Chrysotile
Asbestos
Silver Non-Fibrous: No Asbestos
Detected
Fibrous: 80% Chrysotile Asbestos
Asbestos;
Black Tar: No Asbestos Detected
Fibrous: 80% Chrysotile Asbestos
Beige Semi-Fibrous: No Asbestos
Detected
White Semi-Fibrous: 7% Chrysotile
Asbestos;
Semi-Fibrous: 10% Amosite Asbestos;
5% Chrysotile Asbestos
Semi-Fibrous: 5% Chrysotile Asbestos;
Non-Fibrous: No Asbestos Detected
Semi-Fibrous: 3% Chrysotile Asbestos
Room 2149
Non-Fibrous: 2% Chrysotile Asbestos
50 Each
$500
Room 2152
Non-Fibrous: 5% Chrysotile Asbestos
44 Each
$500
Room 2170

Asbestos
370 Each
$1,000

February 26, 2014
Page 12 of 19
Building
Haring Hall
Black Tar Paper

Under Sink
Room 1227C
Freezer Insulation
Cork and Tar
Throughout Building
Transite Sinks and

Air/Gas Boxes
Throughout Building
Chalkboards
Throughout Building
2 Diameter Asbestos
Cement (Transite)
Flues
Air Handler Duct
Insulation Fibrous.
Fiberglass
Appearance
Black Solid Lab
Tabletop
Black Lab Table Top,
Thick Laminate
From First Floor

through Roof,
Throughout Building
Haring Hall
Haring Hall
Haring Hall
Haring Hall
Haring Hall
Haring Hall
Haring Hall
Haring Hall
Haring Hall
Haring Hall
Haring Hall
Haring Hall

Asbestos;
Fibrous: No Asbestos Detected
Throughout Building

Throughout Building
Throughout Building
Green Pebble Pattern

Sheet Vinyl Flooring
Rooms 1139, 1342
Haring Hall
Haring Hall
Haring Hall
3 Each
$100
18,350
SF
$100,000
1,230
Each
$4,000
3,250 SF
$4,000
4,400 LF
$20,000
1,200 SF
$5,000
25,500
SF
12,400
SF
$12,000
$6,000
11,900 LF
$12,000
700 SF
$2,100
480 SF
$1,000
Large Classroom
(Room 1310A) and
Hallway
Yellow Mastic: No Asbestos Detected

Black Mastic: 2% Chrysotile Asbestos
2,400 SF
$5,000
Throughout Building
Sheet Flooring: No Asbestos Detected

2,400 SF
$7,500
3,200 SF
$10,000
3,200 SF
$10,000
30,200
SF
$30,000
Large Classroom
Central Wing
Tan Pebble Sheet

Vinyl Flooring over
9x 9 Tile
Throughout Building
Throughout Building

Cementitious Tar: Trace (<1%)
Chrysotile Asbestos
Fibrous Backing: No Asbestos Detected
Tile Debris: 5% Chrysotile Asbestos
Throughout Building

34,100
SF
$70,000
12x12 Beige Floor

Tile over 9x 9 Black
Floor Tile
Throughout Building
Off-White Tile: No Asbestos Detected

Yellow Mastic: No Asbestos Detected
Black Tile: 5% Chrysotile Asbestos
Tan Tile: 7% Chrysotile Asbestos
22,600
SF
$75,000
Fire Doors
Throughout Building
Assumed Asbestos
325 Each
$2,000
Fume Hoods with

Transite
Throughout Building
Assumed Asbestos
225 Each
$4,000
Haring Hall
Haring Hall
Cost
Estimate

Tan Marble Linoleum

over Black Tar
Black Mastic for 9x

9 Tiles
12x12 Beige Floor
Tile and Black
Adhesive

Mastic: Trace (<1%) Chrysotile
Asbestos
Fibrous Backing: 70% Chrysotile
Asbestos
Approx.
Quantity*
Room 2216
Haring Hall
Haring Hall
Fibrous: No Asbestos Detected

Silver Paint: No Asbestos Detected
Cementitious Tar: 2% Chrysotile
Asbestos
3% Amosite Asbestos
Asbestos;
10% Crocidolite Asbestos
Roof
Brown Baseboard
Adhesive
12x12 Gray Floor

Tile and Black
Adhesive
12x12 Beige Floor
Tile and Black
Adhesive, on Wood
Tan Marble Sheet
Vinyl Flooring with
Black Adhesive
Results

February 26, 2014
Page 13 of 19
Building
Haring Hall
Haring Hall
Haring Hall
Mastic and Felt
around
Freezer/Refrigeration
Units
Underground Transite
Piping
Underground ACM
Friable Piping
Results
Approx.
Quantity*
Cost
Estimate
Assumed Asbestos
8,000 SF
$24,000
Assumed Asbestos
5,000 LF
$10,000
Assumed Asbestos
1,000 LF
$7,000
Total
$1,796,500
Throughout Building
Below Grade Around
Building
Below Grade Around
Building
Asbestos Sampling Conclusions & Recommendations

Based on the sample results, the planned Renovation/Demolition project will impact asbestos-containing
materials. The final scope of work should be reviewed against the asbestos survey information. If asbestoscontaining materials will be disturbed during the projects, all work should be performed by licensed asbestos
abatement contractors working under standard asbestos program requirements.
A review of all other asbestos survey information available for the property in conjunction with these results
should be conducted prior to proceeding with project activities and when a change in the project scope is
developed. If suspect asbestos-containing materials will be impacted that are not addressed in this survey or in the
historical survey records, additional sampling should be conducted prior to disturbance. Historical records
(typically predating 1995) have limited value for project planning and should be verified with confirmatory
inspection and additional sampling as necessary prior to project planning.
Lead Sample Results

Mr. Chris Yama, a California Department of Public Health Lead Inspector/Assessor/Monitor (I/A/M-3814) with
ACC, collected twenty-six (26) bulk samples to establish lead-paint concentration for clean up and disposal
requirements. Samples with detectable amounts of lead must be properly removed and disposed of according to
local, state and federal regulations. Lead sampling was conducted to identify suspect lead-containing coatings that
may be disturbed by project activities for the purpose of compliance with Cal-OSHAs Lead in Construction
Standard and is not intended to be a Lead Inspection or Lead Risk Assessment as defined by the California
Department of Public Health.
The bulk samples were obtained from suspect lead-containing building materials identified at the building. Paint
sampling was limited to major paint colors on interior and exterior walls, including the predominant trim color
throughout the building and may not represent all accent or trim colors found at the property. Paint colors and/or
descriptions are identified based on the surface color observed by ACC at the time of the survey and does not
necessarily identify paint descriptions underlying the surface coat.
The samples were delivered to Forensic Analytical Laboratories, of Hayward, California; an independent
American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) accredited laboratory, for analysis. Samples were analyzed by
Atomic Absorption (AA) Spectroscopy in accordance with the EPA 3050B/7420 Method. The colors, locations,
and lead contents of these paints are listed below.
Summary of Lead Bulk Sample Results

February 26, 2014
Page 14 of 19
Sample
No.
PT-1
PT-2-1 & 2
PT-3
PT-4
PT-5-1
Material Location
Lead Content
(ppm unless
otherwise noted)
Approximate
Quantity*
Tan Epoxy Floor
Room 1322
<7
4,900 SF
Tan/Brown Ceramic Wall Tile
Rooms 2067, 2116
<7
12,400 SF
Ceramic Floor Tile
Room 2067
<7
3,750 SF
Throughout
0.97 wt%
700 SF
0.031 wt%
900 SF
Brown and Beige Paint on Base

of Walls
Tan and Brown Paint on Exterior
Concrete Walls
PT-6
Tan Paint on Exterior Stucco
Southwest Exterior
140
Intact
PT-7
Tan Ceramic Wall Tile
2nd Floor West Wing
1,300
600 SF (area)
PT-8
Brown Epoxy Floor (Partially

Concealed)
West Wing
21
16,300 SF (area)
PT-9
Varnish on Wood Panels
Room 1108
<7
Intact
Green, White, & Beige Paint
Interior Concrete
0.44 wt%
1,500 SF
PT-11
Gray Epoxy Floor
Room 1131
<7
1,700 SF
PT-12
Beige/Brown Paint on Exterior

Stucco
West Wing North
0.11 wt%
Intact
PT-13
Beige/Tan Paint on Doors
Throughout
0.39 wt%
50 SF
PT-14
Green, Blue, Beige, White Paint on

Drywall
Throughout
<0.007 wt%
Intact
PT-15
Tan Paint on HVAC Equipment
Roof
0.052 wt%
100 SF
PT-16
Varnish on Wood Doors
Throughout
63
Intact
PT-17
Varnish on Wood Cabinets
Throughout
<7
Intact
PT-18
Gray Paint on Floor
Loading Dock, Room 1268
<0.006 wt%
50 SF
PT-10-1 &
2
PT-20-1 &
2
PT-21
PT-22
PT-23
PT-24
Green, Brown, Tan, White,

Beige, Blue Paint on Plaster
Throughout
0.98 wt%
1,900 SF
Beige Paint Inside Freezer
Room 1261
0.052 wt%
900 SF
Roof
<0.007 wt%
500 SF
Rails/Beams
0.24 wt%
Intact
Cabinets
0.23 wt%
Intact
Tan and Yellow Paint on Roof

Equipment
Silver and Other Color Paints on
Structural Steel
White/Beige Paint
Total
Cost Estimate
$1,400
$20,000
$1,200
$1,000
$18,000
$1,000
$500
$4,000
$1,350,000 if
manually
demolished for
renovation. $20,000
if demolished with
building
$1,000
$5,000
$1,000
$74,100-$1,404,100
Of the twenty-six (26) samples collected, four (4) were reported to contain lead above 0.5%, 5,000 parts per
million (weight by weight), or 1.0 mg/cm2 which is the definition for lead based paint by the Environmental

February 26, 2014
Page 15 of 19
Protection Agency (EPA) and the California Department of Public Health (CDPH). Of the twenty-six samples
collected, fourteen (14) were found to have detectable amounts of lead. The OSHA Lead in Construction Standard
requires the use of special work practices during the disturbance of paint with any detectable amounts of lead. See
OSHA Lead Regulation Summary below. Lead containing waste materials with a concentration greater than
0.1%, for total lead, is considered hazardous waste in the State of California. Lead containing waste materials with
a total lead concentration between 0.005% (50 ppm) and 0.10% (1000 ppm) must be re-analyzed using the waste
extraction test (WET) method to determine the soluble lead content for waste disposal requirements.
The EPA Renovation, Repair and Painting Final Rule (40 CFR 745) requires that renovations conducted for
compensation (where lead-based paint will be disturbed) in Target Housing or Child-Occupied facilities, must be
performed by Certified Firms using Certified Renovators following the requirements set forth in the regulation.
Contractors are also required to notify the Division of Occupational Safety and Health (DOSH) prior to disturbing
greater than 100 square feet or l00 linear feet of material containing lead greater than 0.5% by weight, 5000 parts per
million (ppm) or 1.0 milligram per square centimeter (mg/cm2).
OSHA Lead Regulation Summary

The Federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), has enacted a lead standard, which was
adopted by the Cal/OSHA as 8 CCR 1532.1. The purpose of both standards is to protect construction workers
from exposure to lead. OSHA is primarily concerned with activities that disturb paints with any detectable
amounts of lead. Lead was used in most paints until the mid 1950s and was banned in amounts in excess of
0.06% by weight in 1978 for most non-industrial paints by the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC).
The Cal/OSHA standard requires contractors and employers to notify the State of California Division of
Occupational Safety and Health (DOSH) prior to disturbing greater than 100 square feet or 100 linear feet of
material containing lead greater than 0.5%, 5,000 parts per million (weight by weight), or 1.0 mg/cm2. The
Cal/OSHA standard also requires contractors and employers who perform paint removal activities to monitor their
employees to determine whether they are being exposed in excess of the action level of 30 micrograms per cubic
meter of air (g/m3) over an eight-hour time weighted average (TWA) or the Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL)
of 50 g/m3 TWA. Monitoring is performed by personal air sampling.
Even when concentrations are below the action level, an employer must provide employees with High Efficiency
Particulate Air (HEPA) filtered vacuums, wetting agents and hand-washing facilities. If the exposure exceeds the
action level or the PEL, other procedures such as containing the area, local exhaust ventilation, respiratory and
worker protection, worker training, decontamination facilities and medical monitoring are required.
OSHA has identified several work practices that pose varying levels of lead exposure to laborers disturbing leadcontaining paint. Estimated exposure levels of lead are founded on the activity itself, rather than the
concentrations of lead present in paint. Therefore, as an example, paint that contains 0.5% versus 15% of lead by
weight or 0.8 mg/cm2 versus 3.5 mg/cm2 of lead in paint could pose the same exposure levels to workers
depending on the activities that cause the disturbance and the administrative and engineering controls that are
followed.
The following is a summary of work activities that disturb paint, the expected exposure and the respiratory
protection requirements that result as outlined in the OSHA standards:
Activities
Class I activities include: Manual demolition, manual
scraping, manual sanding, heat gun applications, general
cleanup, power tool cleaning with dust collection systems
Potential Exposure
50 g/m3 to 500 g/m3

Half mask air purifying respirator equipped
with HEPA filters having a protection factor
of 10

February 26, 2014
Page 16 of 19
Activities
and spray painting activities
Class II activities include: Using lead-containing mortars,
lead burning, lead riveting, rivet busting, power tool
cleaning without dust collection systems, cleanup of dry
expendable abrasives and abrasive blasting
Class III activities include: Abrasive blasting, welding,
cutting and torch burning on steel structures
Potential Exposure
500 g/m3 to 2,500 g/m3
Full face powered air purifying respirators

equipped with HEPA filters having a
protection factor of 100
Greater than 2,500 g/m3
Full face supplied air respirator operated in

pressure demand mode or other positive
pressure mode (type C)
Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB) Sampling

Mr. Chris Yama with ACC conducted sampling of caulkings typically suspected to contain Polychlorinated
Biphenyls (PCBs) on February 12, 2014. Three (3) samples were collected and delivered to EMSL Analytical, Inc.,
of San Leandro, California, an independent accredited laboratory for analysis by the EPA 8082 Method. Copies of
the laboratory results are attached for reference.
PCBs are mixtures of synthetic organic chemicals with the same basic chemical structure and similar physical
properties ranging from oily liquids to waxy solids. Due to their non-flammability, chemical stability, high boiling
point and electrical insulating properties, PCBs were used in hundreds of industrial and commercial applications
including electrical, heat transfer, and hydraulic equipment; as plasticizers in paints, plastics and rubber products;
in pigments, dyes and carbonless copy paper and many other applications. More than 1.5 billion pounds of PCBs
were manufactured in the United States prior to cessation of production in 1977.
PCBs have been demonstrated to cause a variety of adverse health effects, including cancer in animals. PCBs
have also been shown to cause a number of serious non-cancer health effects in animals, including effects on the
immune system, reproductive system, nervous system, endocrine system and other health effects. Studies in
humans provide supportive evidence for potential carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic effects of PCBs. The
different health effects of PCBs may be interrelated, as alterations in one system may have significant
implications for the other systems of the body.
Any single, unique, well-defined chemical compound in the PCB category is called a "Congener". The name of a
congener specifies the total number of chlorine substituents and the position of each chlorine. PCBs were
manufactured as a complex mixture of congeners, through progressive chlorination of batches of Biphenyl until a
certain target percentage of Chlorine by weight was achieved. Commercial mixtures with higher percentages of
Chlorine contained higher proportions of the more heavily chlorinated congeners, but all congeners could be
expected to be present at some level in all mixtures. Once released into the environment and subjected to
"weathering", or taken in by plants or animals and partially stored/metabolized/excreted, substantial changes in
the congener ratios occurred, and continue to occur. Thus, determination of the parent mixture(s) ultimately
resulting in a given environmental sample may be difficult or impossible. While PCB was manufactured and sold
under many names, the most common were the "Aroclor" series, in many of which a numerical identifier included
the percentage of Chlorine (e.g., "Aroclor 1254", with 54 percent Chlorine). Laboratory reports typically reflect
equivalent Aroclor series for each sample.
The proper identification and handling of PCB-contaminated equipment and wastes is critical to the prevention of
future waste management problems. All equipment or waste containing PCBs should be properly labeled, alerting
people to the requirement for special handling procedures. While procedures may vary depending on the industry
or specific operation, as a general rule, any time there is a risk of contact with PCBs, appropriate protective
equipment should be worn to limit contact with the skin and eyes and to protect against inhalation of PCB fumes.

February 26, 2014
Page 17 of 19
Such equipment may include plastic or rubber gloves, boots, overalls, aprons, face shields or self-contained
breathing apparatus. For workers cleaning up a major spill containing high concentrations of PCBs, a full suit of
non-porous material should be worn. Clothing that has become contaminated should be disposed of along with
other PCB wastes.
PCB manufacture, use, storage and disposal are regulated by U.S. EPA under TSCA and Part 761, Title 40 of the
Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR Part 761). TSCA regulates any materials or wastes that contain PCBs at
concentrations of 50 ppm (parts per million) or greater. PCB wastes are also regulated as hazardous waste by
DTSC under the Health and Safety Code (HSC) and Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations (22 CCR).
Criteria for determining PCB wastes are:
total threshold limit concentration (TTLC) of 50 ppm of PCBs, and/or

soluble threshold limit concentration (STLC) of 5 ppm of PCBs as oily liquid.
Summary of PCB Sampling Results
Sample
Number
Sample Location
PCB Concentration
PCB-1
Beige/Gray/Olive Green Caulking
Perimeter of Exterior Windows
0.68 mg/kg (None Detected)
PCB-2
Gray Caulking
West Wing - New Windows
PCB-3
Gray Caulking
Interior Windows
Other Hazardous Materials

ACC quantified the number of mercury containing light tubes; suspect PCB-containing ballasts and Mercury
thermostat switches as part of the scope of work. These materials and the quantities indicated below should be
included in the hazardous materials removal scope of work or handled by properly trained workers of the
demolition contractor and segregated into specific waste streams prior to disturbance by general demolition
activities.
Estimated Quantity
Cost estimate
Florescent/Mercury Vapor Light Tubes (4equivalent)
7,900 Each
$8,000
Suspect PCB-containing Light Ballasts
3,950 Each
$20,000
300 Each
$900
Universal Waste/Other Hazardous Wastes
Mercury-containing Thermostat Switches

Lead Soundproofing Sheets
None Identified
Water/Mold Impacted Materials
2,500 SF
A/C Units
520 Each
Included above in wall and ceiling

demo
$3,000
90 Each Assumed
$3,000
Oil in Pumps and Elevators
50 Each
$2,000
Mercury in P-Traps
840 Each
$2,000
7 Each
$10,000-14,000
Total
$48,900-52,900
Freezers/ Refrigerators and CFCS
Transformers with Assumed PCBs
Limitations

February 26, 2014
Page 18 of 19
ACC conducted the limited survey with the standard of care ordinarily exercised by qualified and reputable
members of the environmental/industrial hygiene profession based on conditions and practices observed at the
property and information provided to ACC related to the project and/or purpose of the survey at the time of the
investigation. The survey was limited to specific project areas and was not intended to identify all suspect
asbestos-containing materials within the building. Areas and materials not included in the survey should be
inspected and sampled prior to any renovation, maintenance, demolition or other activity that may cause
disturbance to the materials. This report does not intend to identify all hazards or unsafe practices, nor to indicate
that other hazards or unsafe conditions do not exist at the property.
ACC encountered the following inaccessible areas in addition to general concealed conditions (i.e. within wall
cavities, above/below solid ceilings or flooring/sub-flooring materials, etc.) and are excluded from the scope of
the survey. These areas should be inspected and any suspect asbestos-containing materials sampled for the
presence of asbestos prior to any renovation, maintenance, demolition or other activity that may cause disturbance
to the materials.
Inaccessible Areas
No inaccessible areas/equipment were identified within the provided project areas
Materials that would require intrusive or destructive sampling were generally not sampled as part of the project
unless written direction was provided to ACC to perform intrusive and/or destructive sampling on specific
building systems, the area was unoccupied at the time of the survey and by performing intrusive/destructive
sampling would not create an unsafe condition. Furthermore, ACC shall not be responsible for identifying and/or
sampling suspect materials concealed within walls, columns, beneath flooring, above solid ceilings, underground
or in any other concealed areas. ACC shall not be responsible for identification, sampling and/or characterization
of water or mold impacted materials. General observations may be noted if ACC observed suspect conditions to
the client either separately or within this report.
ACC excludes sampling concrete and asphalt paving as suspect asbestos-containing materials. Aggregate found in
these materials may contain asbestos if supplied from quarries located in known ultra-mafic areas. It is possible
that prior to recycling and/or disposal, recycling agents or landfills may require sampling of these materials to
determine the presence of asbestos prior to acceptance.
ACC excludes characterization of soils in areas on known ultramafic rock (where naturally occurring asbestos
may be found in soils) as part of the scope of work. If the project area is located within a known ultramafic rock
area, provisions should be made to address regulatory requirements for any planned excavation and grading as
part of the project. ACC can provide further detail on regulatory requirements related to naturally occurring
asbestos in soils.
Quantities identified may not represent entire quantities of each material in the building based on the scope of the
survey.
The analyzing laboratory quantifies asbestos concentrations by calibrated visual estimation using standard PLM
methodology, with detection of asbestos is material/matrix dependent. Detection of trace asbestos (<1%) may not
be reliable or reproducible by PLM and percentage of asbestos weight cannot be determined with standard PLM
methodology. Confirmation of asbestos concentrations within complex matrices (i.e. plaster, gypsum
wallboard/taping/joint compounds, stucco, resilient flooring, roofing) or when asbestos concentrations are 1% or
less may warrant additional analysis by PLM point counting, gravimetric reduction or Transmission Electron
Microscopy for proper characterization of asbestos-containing materials and/or waste-stream analysis.

February 26, 2014
Page 19 of 19
This report is prepared for the express use of University of California at Davis, its agents and employees. The
information in this report or portions thereof may be required to be included in notifications to employees,
occupants, contractors, vendors or other visitors to the building. This report is not intended to be used as a
specification or work plan for removal of asbestos-containing or other hazardous materials identified in the report
or for any work suggested by the report.
Please contact me at (510) 638-8400 extension 111 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
ACC ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, INC.
Chris Yama, CAC, CHMM, LEED AP

Senior Project Manager
Cal-OSHA Certified Asbestos Consultant #98-2356
California Department of Public Health Lead I/A/M #3814
/jpt
Attachments:
Laboratory Reports
DELTA DEVELOPMENT
Environmental Consulting
August 22, 2014
Mr. Fred Torres, Project Manager

Facilities, Mechanical / HVAC
University of California
One Shields Avenue
Davis, California 95616
Dear Mr. Torres:

Per your request, I have reviewed additional hazardous material (asbestos/lead) pre-job start and post
project close-out information you provided August 20, 2014. The aforementioned documents are
associated with Olson Hall HVAC System Upgrades, Phase II, in Room 0040, Basement Mechanical
Room (University Project Number 2503800). Two Rivers Demolition commenced site work associated
with the aforementioned project on June 16, 2014 and the University accepted said site work as complete
on June 20, 2014. Olson Hall is located on the UC Davis Campus, in Davis, California.
Deviations from University Asbestos and Lead Remediation specifications (Sections 028200 & 028300),
and the Contractors approved Work and Disposal Plans have complicated Project Close Out. This is due
in part to the Universitys pre-demolition activities which resulted in a lead dust release, and ultimately
changed the Contractors lead work classification from non-trigger task work to lead trigger task work.
The aforementioned deviations include but are not limited to the following: Pre-Job Start Submittals;
Contractors approved Work Plan (means & methods); Contractors approved waste disposal plans; and
University clearance criteria.
This letter identifies pre-job start and post-job completion submittal deficiencies and/or omissions related
to the Universitys Asbestos Remediation Specification (Section 028200) and Lead Remediation
Specification (Section 028300). Said deficiencies and/or omissions listed below must be corrected and
accepted by the Universitys prior to issuing the Contractor final payment. Also, please let me know if
additional documentation is needed to address mid-project modifications to requirements found in the
Universitys Asbestos and Lead Remediation Specifications, including lead clearance criteria and
asbestos / lead disposal.
Asbestos Pre-Job Start & Post Job Completion Submittal Deficiencies and/or Omissions:
1. One electronic copy of supplemental pre-job start submittals was provided. Contractor shall provide
required number of hard copies of project submittals per Section 028200, 1.5 Submittals, D.
2. Laboratory Qualifications: EMSL Analytical, Inc. of San Leandro, California is identified as the
Contractors asbestos laboratory, however, asbestos analysis reports have not been provided.
Contractor shall submit asbestos analysis reports.
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 3203 Rancho Cordova, CA 95741-3203

11275 Sunrise Gold Circle, Suite Q Rancho Cordova, CA 95742
Phone (916) 631-1400 Fax (916) 631-0200
DELTA DEVELOPMENT

UCD, Olson Hall HVAC System Upgrades
Room 0040, Basement Mechanical Room
University Project Number 2503800
Asbestos/Lead Removal Close-Out Documentation Review # 2
August 22, 2014
Page Two
3. A statement titled 3.15 Project Close-Out was provided on Two Rivers Demolitions letterhead,
and appears to contain information pertaining to both asbestos and lead Project Close-Out
documentation. Although Asbestos and Lead Project Close Out documentation may contain
some duplicate information, said information must be provided as two independent documents.
Contractor shall provide Asbestos Project Close Out information identified in Project Close-Out
Requirements, Section 028200 Asbestos Remediation Specification, 3.15. Close Out
documentation shall pertain to actual work performed, not proposed work, and clarify deviations
from project specifications and approved Work and Disposal Plans, including means and
methods, and waste packaging / transportation / disposal.
4. Contractors statement titled 3.15 Project Close-Out, which was provided on Two Rivers
Demolitions letterhead, states All asbestos was turned over to the University for disposal per
John Nichols of Delta Development. The aforementioned statement is false and must be
removed from the Contractors Close Out documentation. Neither John Nichols or Delta
Development directed the Contractor to deviate from the approved waste disposal plan.
Furthermore, Asbestos Project Close Out documentation should accurately reflect waste disposal
and any deviations from approved Exhibit 21 Asbestos Waste Disposal Plan.
5. Exhibit 22 Asbestos As-Built Summary is incomplete with regard to waste disposal and
transportation, and states See attached document Asbestos Waste. However, the
aforementioned Asbestos Waste document was not provided. Contractor shall provide waste
disposal and transportation information requested in Exhibit 22 Asbestos As-Built Summary,
Section 028200 Asbestos Remediation Specification.
Lead Pre-Job Start & Post Job Completion Submittal Deficiencies and/or Omissions:
2. Recycler weight tickets include slips from Sims Metal, however, Sims Metal is not the recycler
identified in the Contractors approved disposal plan. Additionally, recycler weight tickets
appear to include materials not associated with the Olson Hall project. Contractor shall clarify.

Phone (916) 631-1400 Fax (916) 631-0200
DELTA DEVELOPMENT

August 22, 2014
Page Three
Contractor shall provide Lead Project Close Out information identified in Project Close-Out
Requirements, Section 028300 Lead Remediation Specification, 3.15. Close Out documentation
shall pertain to actual work performed, not proposed work, and
clarify deviations from project specifications and approved Work and Disposal Plans, including
means and methods and waste handling. Identify all waste streams, and account for waste hazard
classification / packaging / transportation / disposal.
4. Contractors statement titled 3.15 Project Close-Out was provided on Two Rivers Demolitions
letterhead, and states Materials were hauled off by Two Rivers Demolition Inc. and transported
to Schnitzer Steel Products. Identify the materials hauled to Schnitzer Steel Products.
Additionally, transport vehicles observed on site were marked as Primoris Demolition, not Two
Rivers as stated in Project Close Out documentation. Contractor shall clarify.
5. Exhibit 25 Lead As-Built Summary is incomplete with regard to waste disposal and
transportation, and states See attached document Lead Waste. However, the aforementioned
Lead Waste document was not provided. Contractor shall provide waste disposal and
transportation information requested in Exhibit 25 Lead As-Built Summary, Section 028300 Lead
Remediation Specification. Be sure to account for all waste streams, including, but not limited to
dust, vacuum debris, decontamination materials and supplies, and personal protective equipment.
If you have questions regarding information included in this letter please contact me at (916) 631-1400.
Thank you for the opportunity to serve you.
Sincerely,
John M. Nichols
Certified Lead Consultant, 2839
Certified Asbestos Consultant, 92-0039
Cc:
Tom Emme, UCD

Cynthia Hongola, UCD

Phone (916) 631-1400 Fax (916) 631-0200
July 30, 2015
Project No.: 2505030.01.00
Scott Slayton, Project Manager

Design and Construction Management
University of California, Davis
255 Cousteau Place
Davis, CA 95618
RE:
Asbestos Air and Visual Clearance - Pass

Olson Hall Classroom Renovations Classroom 0101
198 Peter J Shields Avenue
Davis, CA 95616
Dear Mr. Slayton,

The following report is in regards to the completed air monitoring clearance sampling that was conducted
at the above listed address, in Olson Hall Classroom 0101 (CAAN #3803; Zone #C005). Prior to the
visual inspection and air clearance sampling being conducted by N.A.L., Allied Environmental, Inc.,
removed the asbestos containing Floor Tile, Mastic, and Transite Chalkboard materials from the work
area.
Denis Edwards, Certified Asbestos Consultant, for National Analytical Laboratories, Inc., completed the
air clearance sampling on July 29, 2015. Because the visual inspection showed no asbestos containing
construction materials (ACCM), asbestos debris, or any other impairment, Mr. Edwards proceeded with
the Phase Contrast Microscopy (PCM) air clearance sampling using 25mm cassettes.
The cassettes used had a Mixed Cellulose Ester membrane 0.8 m, micron pore size that is used
specifically for PCM sampling. The air monitoring cassette was calibrated with a Dwyer series VFB VisiFloat Flowmeter at 8.33 liters per minute (lpm). The air monitor operated for total of 150 minutes, for a
total cassette volume of 1249.50 liters. The total volume fell within the projected range of 400 to 1800
liters for PCM sampling. A total of two (2) samples were collected from the Center of Classroom 0101
and transported to MicroTest Laboratories, Inc., for analysis.
The average concentration for airborne fibers found in the two (2) samples was <0.002 f/cc. The
clearance result is below the Environmental Protection Agency
s (EPA
s) PCM clearance level of 0.01
f/cc. Laboratory analytical report and chain of custody form attached.
Classroom 0101 work area has been cleared for re-occupancy. Individuals may enter the Classroom
without any health or safety concerns in regards to the exposure of airborne asbestos fibers.
If you have any questions regarding this report or if we can be of further assistance, please contact our
office.
Reviewed and submitted by:
MULMSLNS
Anthony M. De Arcos
Certified Asbestos Consultant, DOSH #92-0261
35585
MicroTest Laboratories
Inc.
AIHA IHPAT # 160934

5150 Sunrise Blvd, Suite B-1
Fair Oaks, CA 95628
. Tel. (916) 567-980gFax: (916) 4-36-3603
E-mail:
mlcrotestlabsincepvahoo.com
..
NAL
CLIENT:
2201 Francisco Drive, Ste 140-261

EI Dorado Hills, CA 95762
PROJECT:
Olson Hall
SAMPLES COLLECTEDBY:
Edwards
TYPE OF SAMPLE:
PCM Cassette x2
COLLECTION DATE:
7/29/2015
SUBMISSION DATE:
7/29/2015
ACCESSIONNUMBER:
41120-41121
TYPE OF ANALYSIS:
Phase Contrast Microscopy,
REPORTDATE:
7/30/2015
REPORTEDAND REVIEWED BY:
Rebecca Hutty, MicroTest Laboratories
NIOSH 7400 Method "A" Rules
Inc., Analyzed by: M. Nguyen
PHASE CONTRAST MICROSCOPY-NIOSH 7400

The "Samples" collected demonstrated
Sample #
3853-03AC
41120
3853-04AC
41121
Sample Description
Clearance Rm 101
Sample Type Total Volume
the following:
Fibers
Fields
Fibers/mm2
U.c.L.
LOD
fb/cc
Clearance
1250
<5.5
100
<7
<0.007
0.002
<0.002
Blank
N/A
<5.5
100
<7
N/A
N/A
N/A
Field Blank
,
*AII samples tested as submitted

information
to Microtest
Labs, Inc. We do not assume responsibility
for the accuracy of the
submitted.
*Any numerical value which calculates to be less than 0.01 fb/cc should be view as <0_01 fb/cc due to the inaccuracy of
the NIOSH 7400 Method (LOD 7fb/mm2).
*Comments
such as "Overloaded",
"Dirty", "Wet Filter", "Uneven disbursement
of Fibers" or "Torn Filter", ill~s.trate that
the analyst found discrepancies or problems with the sample and the results are not considered accurate.
....
Page
1 of 1
Login # 35585
NAL LOG-IN RECORD

Ph: 916.361.0555 Fx: 916.361.0540
Job Site/Job #:
National Analytical Laboratories, Inc.

Client#-Lot#
4373 / 741
Olson Hall (CAAN #3803; Zone #C005):
UC Davis Design & Construction Management
Date
7/30/2015
Classrooms 0101, 0105, 0118, 0125, 0141,

0163 & 0227
Sampling Date:
7/29/2015
Davis, CA 95616
Sampling Time
9:55:00 AM
Phone Number
FAX Number
Type of Work:
Contact
Scott Slayton
2505030
No. of Samples
E-Mail Address
Turnaround:
Num.
Sample ID#
Min.
LPM
Volume
Location/Description
3803-03AC
150
8.33
1249.5
Classroom 0101, Center of Room / Clearance
3803-04ACFB
PCM Clearance
2
Rush
Field Blank / 30 Second Cap Off
Chain of Custody Information

Released By Signature
Denis Edwards
Date/
Time
072915
1640
Date/
Time
Received By Signature
Date/
Time
Date/
Time
Due:
7/29/2015
At: 13:55
.... :
',!..
On
Special Instructions:
3gS0,d<!;4<
/~
Time
Total
Minutes
S-- 1{:J:j
Off
I---
-Soil
-Mold
,..---
0,;;-:>
t. 3~ Ci:37,
Of
,'......
'1
~tilS(j
Total
Volume
ANAl\'TICAl
SF/LF/CF
INC.
.PH
/O(
Clearance
~:::~~na~
Area
r/C,t) 1J.L~t.
CL6~c:6.
tK=
I---
r--
C.I~EM
------------------------,
www.nall.com
PLM
PLM
r--TTFP
*
I--400 Pt. Ct.
I--1000 Pt. Ct.
Measurement
I.AIlORATOIUES,
2201 Francisco Dr. Ste. 140-2611

El Dorado Hills, CA. 95762
Phone (916) 361-0555
Fax (916) 361-0540
NATIONAL
DatelTime
LEAD AIR
Area
-Personal
Ambient Air
-
DatelTime
(ILl
L( I ( LO ..
Received B :
LEAD WIPES
Clearance
Baseline
Ct&UTi/Z6~~
LocationlDescription
LEAD BULK
Chip
Soil
-TTLC
-STLC
I--TCLlP
Contact:
# of Samples:
Job Number:
Job Site:
t:;7:JcJ.,4.R..'O S
1\L \
Sampler:
Login #:
Y )I 'r= - '-i
: ,NAL
SAMPLE DATE:
OTHER
Water
Liters Per Minute

On
Off
Aver
0".,
TURNAROUND
Rush
,/
6 Hour
24 Hour
72 Hour
.rco
~c;""'-
3K:1-61{tG d~~;-
Sample
Number
TYPE OF WORK
Laboratory
Consulting
.~ On Site
E-Mail:
Phone:
Address:
Contact:
Company:
Page
"
'
'.
..,
July 31, 2015
Project No.: 2505030.01.00

255 Cousteau Place
Davis, CA 95618
RE:

Olson Hall Classroom Renovations Classrooms 0105 & 0227
Davis, CA 95616
Dear Mr. Slayton,

at the above listed address, in Olson Hall Classrooms 0105 & 0227 (CAAN #3803; Zone #C005). Prior
to the visual inspection and air clearance sampling being conducted by N.A.L., Allied Environmental, Inc.,
removed the asbestos containing materials from the work area.
specifically for PCM sampling. The air monitoring cassette was calibrated with a Dwyer series VFB VisiFloat Flowmeter at 6.48 liters per minute (lpm) in Classroom 0105, and 8.33 lpm in Classroom 0227. The
air monitor operated for total of 200 minutes in Classroom 0105, and 148 minutes in Classroom 0227 for
a total cassette volume of 1296 in Classroom 0105, and 1232.84 in Classroom 0227. The total volume of
both samples fell within the projected range of 400 to 1800 liters for PCM sampling. A total of two (2)
samples were collected from the Center of Classrooms 0105 and 0227 and were transported to
MicroTest Laboratories, Inc., for analysis.
The average concentration for airborne fibers found in the three (3) samples was <0.002 f/cc. The
s (EPA
Classroom 0105 and 0227 work areas have been cleared for re-occupancy. Individuals may enter
the Classrooms without any health or safety concerns in regards to the exposure of airborne asbestos
fibers.
office.
MULMSLNS
Anthony M. De Arcos
35596
Inc.
AIHA IHPAT # 160934

Fair Oaks, CA 95628
. Tel. (916) 567-980S
Fax: (916) 436-3603
E-mail: mfcrotestlabsinctavahoo.com
NAL
CLIENT:

Olson Hall
PROJECT:
CAAN 3853
Edwards
TYPE OF SAMPLE:
PCM Cassette x3
COLLECTION DATE:
7/30/2015
SUBMISSION DATE:
7/30/2015
ACCESSIONNUMBER:
41167-41169
TYPE OF ANALYSIS:
REPORTDATE:
7/31/2015
Rebecca Hutty, MicroTest Laboratories Inc., Analyzed by: M. Nguyen
NIOSH 7400 Method (fA" Rules

Sample #
Sample Description
3853-05AC
Rm 0105 Center of
41167
3853-06AC
. 41168
3853-07AC
41169
Room
Rm 0227 Center of
Reom
Fibers
Fields
Fibers/mm2
U.c.L.
LOD
fb/cc
Clearance
1296
<5.5
100
<7
<0.007
0.01)2
<0.002
Clearance
1233
<5.5
100
<7
<0.007
0.002
<0.002
I
Field Blank
Blank
*AII samples tested as submitted to Microtest

information
the following:
N/A
<5.5
100
<7
N/A
N/A
N/A
for the accuracy of the'
submitted.
/'
*Any numerical value which calculates to be less than 0.01 fb/cc should be view as <0.01 fb/cc due to the in~ccuracy of

*Comments
of Fibers" or "Torn Filter", illustrate that
Page
1 of 1
Login # 35596
NAL LOG-IN RECORD

Ph: 916.361.0555 Fx: 916.361.0540
Job Site/Job #:

Client#-Lot#
4373 / 743
Date
7/31/2015
Classrooms 0101, 0105, 0118, 0125, 0141,

0163 & 0227
Sampling Date:
7/30/2015
Davis, CA 95616
Sampling Time
6:15:00 AM
Phone Number
FAX Number
Type of Work:
Contact
Scott Slayton
2505030
No. of Samples
E-Mail Address
Turnaround:
Num.
Sample ID#
Min.
LPM
Volume
3803-05AC
200
6.48
1296
3803-06AC
148
8.33
3803-07ACFB
PCM Clearance
3
Rush
Classroom 0105, Center of Room / Clearance
1232.84 Classroom 0227, Center of Room / Clearance

0

Denis Edwards
Date/
Time
07/30/15
1615
Date/
Time
Date/
Time
Date/
Time
Due:
7/30/2015
At: 10:15
"
".
"
~
..
','
.:
',!> .
....
On.
***
Time
Off
Minutes
Total
f------- 24 Hour
f------- 72 Hour
RUSh
6 Hour
t::z
f------- Water
Soil
Mold
Special lnstructions:
.5~"3 ~6.) ~
o5<;;~cGk 1/30
13f{1;
&.~~ 8,~~ ~.~
(..98
""
~i3~
~%
Total
Volume
"
Page
NArll)NAt.
SF/LF/CF
IN{
HEt]J
G~
Date/Time
~~60~
C~C~
_Clearance
_Baseline
Contact:
# of Samples:
Job Number:
Job Site:
Sampler:
Login #:
LEAD BULK
Chip
_Soil
TTLC
STLC
TCLlP
t:)/61:('
I?,M 6~7
f2H
Area
Clearance
!3Lf4;AIK-
t:z=
Baseline
CYQj)TEM
_Personal
173<:)
eLt~a
~IOOOPt.Ct.
PLM
PLM
f------- TTFP'
f------- 400 PI. Ct.
Measurement
1'\1I0RATORlfo;.
,~/t /S ' ~,
AN'\lYTI(",\1
y'\l..o~-~I\V'\
NAL
Of
220 I Francisco Dr. Ste. 140-2611

EI Dorado Hills, CA. 95762
Phone (916) 361-0555
Fax (916) 361-0540
www.nal l.corn
DATE:
',......
,:
""
.... ~,
-,
,.'
,
SAMPLE
OTHER
Liters Per Minute

On
Off
Aver
TURN AROUND
only
3~3"'-6SI1< 0&,5' &'f-t.i' .:t.(Xl cP.<~ G,tJ
Sample
Number
TYPEOFWORK
Laboratory
Consulting
/ On Site
E-Mail:
Phone:
Address:
Contact:
Company:
**ortkialusc
Received B :
LEAD WIPES
~Gf
CA/tAi
Date/Time
CD"\
U'Q, . ..
L(H197
Ambient Air
LEAD AIR
Area
_Personal
8~~
'
I
.1
August 04, 2015
Project No.: 2505030.01.00

255 Cousteau Place
Davis, CA 95618
RE:

Davis, CA 95616
Dear Mr. Slayton,

visual inspection and air clearance sampling being conducted by National Analytical Laboratories, Inc.
(N.A.L.), Allied Environmental, Inc., removed the asbestos containing materials from the work area.
Denis Edwards, Certified Asbestos Consultant for N.A.L., completed the air clearance sampling on
August 03, 2015. Because the visual inspection showed no asbestos containing construction materials
(ACCM), asbestos debris, or any other impairment, Mr. Edwards proceeded with the Phase Contrast
Microscopy (PCM) air clearance sampling using 25mm cassettes.
total cassette volume of 1250 liters. The total volume fell within the projected range of 400 to 1800 liters
for PCM sampling. A total of two (2) samples were collected from the Center of Classroom 0118 and
transported to MicroTest Laboratories, Inc., for analysis.
s (EPA
office.
MULMSLNS
Anthony M. De Arcos
35608
Inc.
AIHA IHPAT # 160934

Fair Oaks, CA 95628
Tel. (916) 567-9808
.. Fax: (916) 436-3603
E-mail: microtestlabsinc@yahoo.com
NAL
CLIENT:

Olson Hall
PROJECT:
CAAN 3853
SAMPLES COLLECTED BY:
Edwards
TYPE OF SAMPLE:
PCM Cassette x2
COLLECTION DATE:
8/3/2015
SUBMISSION DATE:
8/4/2015
ACCESSION NUMBER:
41387-41388
TYPE OF ANALYSIS:
REPORT DATE:
8/4/2015

Sample #
3853-10AC
41387
Sample Description
Room 0118 Center
of Room
the following:
Fibers
Fields
Fibers/mm2
U.c.L.
LOD
fb/cc
Clearance
1250
<5.5
100
<7
<0.007
0.002
<0.002
Blank
N/A
<5.5
100
<7
N/A
N/A
N/A
3853-11AC
41388
Field Blank
to Microtest
information submitted.
*Any numerical value which calculates to be less than 0.01 fb/cc should be view as <0.01 fb/cc due to the inaccuracy of
the NIOSH 7400 Method
*Comments
(LOD 7fb/mm2).
"
..-
.:
On
~8S'~-IIAc
.ggf'l -lOA < 13~
Sample
Number
'uc1)
---
/~
orr
Time
ItJCJ
Total
Volume
8.33 1J.51J
If
Lit]:?>?
413S'B
AN,\IYII(
\1
I \!lllR,\TORIf:'i.
IN(
E'ICLO
GL~Qf..
PLM
PLM
'I'TI'P'
400PI.Ct.
1000PI.('I.
KH
Clearance
'i3./c7UK.
t=z:
I---I----
T1i:M
Baseline
Personal
Area
<rCM)/
cJ/rB
C~Qt:=
Date/Time
LEAl} WIPI<:S
C~
Received By:
Clearance
r----Baseline
r-----
I .oca tiun/Description
I----S'I'LC
I----'I'CLIP
I----Soil
f-----'ITLC
Chip
LEAl} BULl(
Contact:
# of Samples:
Job Number:
Job Site:
, Sampler:
Login #:
Lf I J 6(- L\\ >C(j~
r ?3f3;1s"
--------~~.~-----------
www.nul l.com
Chain of Custod
---
--Measurement
SF/LI'/(, I'
N\II()N,\I
220 I Francisco Dr. Sic, 140-2611

III Dorado Hills, '11.,95762
Phone (916) 361-0555
Fax (916) 361-0540
DATE:
:.
1,....
..............
N AL
SAMPLE
O'I'I-IIR
Water
I.ircrsPerMinute
On
orr
Aver
---
-Soil
-Mold
~,33 &.,,'$
Minutes
Total
TURN AROIIND
Rush
~61-lour
24 Hour
-nl-Iour
1:.c60
TYPE OF WORK
l.aboratory
Consulting
/OnSit~
E-Mail:
Phone:
Address:
Contact:
Company:
Page __
LEAl} AIR
Date/Time
"
f-----Area
Personal
f----Ambient.Air
f----'
~S3
'.
July 29, 2015
Project No.: 2505030.01.00

255 Cousteau Place
Davis, CA 95618
RE:

Davis, CA 95616
Dear Mr. Slayton,

removed the asbestos containing Floor Tile, Mastic, and Transite Chalkboard materials from the work
area.
liters for PCM sampling. A total of two (2) samples were collected from the Center of Classroom 0163
and transported to MicroTest Laboratories, Inc., for analysis.
s (EPA
office.
MULMSLNS
Anthony M. De Arcos
35582
-~~~~~
-----~---
Inc.
AIHA IHPAT # 160934

Fair Oaks, CA 95628
. Tel. (916) 567-98mr
Fax: (916) 436-3603
E-mail: mlcrotestlabstncravahoo.com
NAL
CLIENT:

Olson Hall
PROJECT:
CAAN 3853
Edwards
TYPE OF SAMPLE:
PCM Cassette x2
COLLECTION DATE:
7/28/2015
SUBMISSION DATE:
7/28/2015
ACCESSION NUMBER:
40955-40956
TYPE OF ANALYSIS:
REPORTDATE:
7/29/2015
Rebecca Hutty, MicroTest Laboratories Inc., Analyzed by: M. Nguyen

Sample #
3853-01AC
Sample Description
40956
Fields
Fibers/mm2
U.c.L.
LOD
fb/cc
Clearance
1258
<5.5
100
<7
<0.008
0.002
<0.002
Field Blank
Blank
N/A
<5.5
100
<7
N/A
N/A
N/A

information
Fibers
Room 0125
40955
3853-02AC
the following:
to Microtest
submitted.
*Comments
Page
NAL LOG-IN RECORD
1 of 1
Login # 35582
Ph: 916.361.0555 Fx: 916.361.0540

Job Site/Job #:

Client#-Lot#
4373 / 739
Date
7/29/2015
Classrooms 0101, 0105, 0118, 0125, 0141,

0163 & 0227
Sampling Date:
7/28/2015
Davis, CA 95616
Sampling Time
8:30:00 AM
Phone Number
FAX Number
Type of Work:
Contact
Scott Slayton
2505030
E-Mail Address
No. of Samples
Turnaround:
Num.
Sample ID#
Min.
LPM
Volume
3803-01AC
151
8.33
1257.83 Classroom 0125, Center / Clearance
3803-02ACFB
PCM Clearance
2
Rush

Denis Edwards
Date/
Time
07/28/15
15:20
Date/
Time
Date/
Time
Date/
Time
Due:
7/28/2015
At: 12:30
Sample
Number
On
Time
Off
~3-o:lAc
,---
-MId
_0
833
(
Of
ANALYTICAL
PLM
PLM
I\)/{OO
Ei~V
t5L/VUItt
r--f----
DatefTime
~rtZle
LocationlDescription
STLC
f---TCLIP
TTLC
LEAD BULK
Chip
r---Soil
Contact:
# of Samples:
Job Number:
Job Site:
Login #:
'S~-~
"
V/'
OatefTime
5{q
ef&Pt. ~ o9S~'
LEAD WIPES
LEAD AIR
Clearance
f----Area
.
I'
Base me
f---Personal
f---Ambient Air
c.,4ArJ
--~-----------------------
e6/Y1 6/.2-5/
Personal
Area
~Clearance
r--f----
Chain of Custod
INC.
~EM
Baseline
!2-
Ct:..~C~
~IOOOPt.Ct.
Measurement
SFfLFfCF
LAIlORATOIUES.
www.nal l.com
r--- *
TTFP
f---400 Pt. Ct.
8,i.!3 V~j""~ 10(\ 00
Total
Volume
NATIONAL

Phone (916) 361-0555
Fax (916) 361-0540
1',.......
: ,NAL
SAMPLE DATE:
OTHER
Water
Soil
Liters Per Minute

On
Off
Aver
Is! ~
Minutes
Total
TURNAROUND
Rush
-6Hour
24 Hour
72 Hour
-SCOTt
/)GO
.gS3 ..olA:CO1frD /~I/
./
TYPE OF WORK
Laboratory
Consulting
On Site
E-Mail:'
Phone:
Address:
Contact:
Company:
Page
July 27, 2015
Project No.: 2505030.01.00

255 Cousteau Place
Davis, CA 95618
RE:

Davis, CA 95616
Dear Mr. Slayton,

specifically for PCM sampling. The air monitoring cassette was calibrated with a Dwyer series VFB VisiFloat Flowmeter at 10 liters per minute (lpm). The air monitor operated for total of 135 minutes, for a total
cassette volume of 1413 liters. The total volume fell within the projected range of 400 to 1800 liters for
PCM sampling. A total of two (2) samples were collected from the Center of Classroom 0163 and
transported to MicroTest Laboratories, Inc., for analysis.
s (EPA
office.
MULMSLNS
Anthony M. De Arcos
35578
Scott Slayton
225 Cousteau Place
Davis, CA 95618
Phone #
Fax #:
Attention:
Job Site:
Olson Hall (CAAN #3803; Zone #C005)
Classrooms 0101, 0105, 0118, 0125, 0141,
0163& 0227
Davis, CA 95616
Scott Slayton
Email:
Page:
1 of 1
Login #:
35578
Date Samples Taken:
7/27/2015
Date Report Submitted:
7/28/2015
NAL ID # / Lot #:
4373 / 738
Job Number
2505030
Lab Tracking #:
40809-40812
Total Samples:
PHASE CONTRAST MICROSCOPY ANALYTICAL CLEARANCE REPORT (PCM)
Samples ID #
Sample ID #: 3803-02A NAL ID: 4373-738-1
Location: Center of Classroom 0163
Description: Clearance
Sample ID #: 3803-FB NAL ID: 4373-738-2
Location:
Description: 30 Second Cap Off Field Blank
KEY:
Liters/Min Volume
10.47
1413
---
---
Fibers
per
Fields
<5.5/100
Fibers
Per
MM2
<7.0
Fibers
per
CC
<0.002
UCL*
<0.007
0/100
< 7.0
---
---
**TWA: Time Weighted Average per sample. Eight hour TWA summary is provided at the end of each month.
***INF: Sample not suitable for analysis. See sample description.
Analyst: M. Nguyen
Reviewed By:
Rebecca Hutty, MicroTest Laboratories, Inc.
Sample analyzed by Phase Contrast Microscopy in accordance with the N.I.O.S.H. 7400 Method utilizing the ACounting Rules.
*U.C.L. Refers to the 95% Upper Confidence Limit, that insures that the differences in measured concentrations between laboratories within
laboratories will be no higher than the U.C.L. This information is based in part on the volume of the air sampled and fibers counted.
National Analytical Laboratories, Inc. 2201 Francisco Dr. Ste.140-261, El Dorado Hills, CA 95762
Phone (916) 361-0555 Fax (916) 361-0540 Website www.NAL1.com
Page
1 of 1
Login # 35578
NAL LOG-IN RECORD

Ph: 916.361.0555 Fx: 916.361.0540
Job Site/Job #:

Client#-Lot#
4373 / 738
Date
7/27/2015
Classrooms 0101, 0105, 0118, 0125, 0141,

0163 & 0227
Sampling Date:
7/27/2015
Davis, CA 95616
Sampling Time
Phone Number
FAX Number
Type of Work:
Contact
Scott Slayton
2505030
No. of Samples
E-Mail Address
Turnaround:
Num.
Sample ID#
Min.
LPM
Volume
3803-02A
135
10.47
1413
3803-FB
10
PCM Clearance
2
Rush
Center of Classroom 0163 / Clearance

Denis Edwards
Date/
Time
07/27/15
1500
Date/
Time
Date/
Time
Date/
Time
Due:
7/27/2015
At:
Inc.
AIHA IHPAT # 160934

Fair Oaks, CA 95628
Tel. (916) 567-9808
Fax: (916) 436-3603
E-mail: mlcrotestlabsincrevahoc.com
NAL
CLIENT:

Olson Hall
PROJECT:
CAAN#3803
Edwards
TYPE OF SAMPLE:
PCM Cassette x4
COLLECTION DATE:
7/27/2015
SUBMISSION DATE:
7/27/2015
ACCESSIONNUMBER:
40809-40812
TYPE OF ANALYSIS:
REPORT DATE:
7/27/2015
NIOSH 7400 Method itA" Rules

Sample #
Sample Description
3803-01A
Outside Decon Unit
40809
3803-02A
40810
3803-03A
40811
FB
40812
Center of Room Rm
0163
Fibers
Fields
Fibers/mm2
u.c.i,
LOD
fb/cc
Area
714
25
100
32
0.026
0.003
0.017
Clearance
1413
<5.5
100
<7
<0.007
0.001
<0.002
Area
284
32
100
41
0.078
0.007
0.055
Blank
N/A
<5.5
100
<7
N/A
N/A
N/A
Rm 0163
Outside Decon Unit

Rm 0125 Hallway
Field Blank
* All samples tested as submitted

information
the following:
to Microtest
submitted.
-c
...
*Comments
','
"
'."
"
.:
',::, ..
386B~
~l
~W Igc,) 10.C/7
I~s' &6, 131{
I~
Minutes
Liters Per Minute

On
Off
Aver
';J..{
I0Jt7
~,1
~o/J
Total
Vo.wme
~r
11.{13
~I
.:
'
"
ANALYTICAL
LAIlORATORIE$.
INC.
7 / c/
PLM
PLM
# of Samples:
Job Number:
/3(/bt/K
ri~
;J
b:?Allr
08
I 'L
(
Received B :
ttJ'Ac(
h-I ~/03
~
I----
Date/Time
Ambient Air
LEAD AIR
Area
Personal
;t;uWf;e.'Y
LEAD WIPES
Clearance
Baseline
CAM.! "'- B~~
(JI(!;. '3
ma6<6'"
/24
DatelTime
CMr~e/~
TCLIP
I---I----
~STLC
LEAD BULK
Chip
I----Soil
I---TTLC
tJCa;-<J UAt'r
~/Dt{
,
C/~~AA.JC6
~/Z>tE
'//~
C.~TEM
Baseline
I---Personal
r--:::;:;-- Area
r--:::;;:;-- Clearance
I----
I!...-
Z)~S
t-)
d.~/k(,
Job Site:
Sampler:
Login #:
LfcB o'1 -
----------~~~,~~-------Contact:
www.na~~com
-TTFP*
,--400 Pt. Ct.
I---1000 Pt. Ct.
I---Measurement
SFILF/CF
NATIONAL
NAL
Of

Phone (916) 361-0555
Fax (916) 361-0540
DATE:
'
I,
....
.
...
-,,',........-
SAMPLE
OTHER
Water
Soil
Mold
'I;() -:If) ~./ -;'.1 (;.1
Off
Total
TURNAROUND
Rush
~6Hour
24 Hour
I---72 Hour
I----
Time
(:t{
On
EfE...
u 3&ff~
to
3Z>63<J#4
Sample
Number
TYPE OF WORK
Laboratory
Consulting
./ On Site
E-Mail:
Phone:
Address:
Contact:
Company:
Page
"
..'
"
August 03, 2015
Project No.: 2505030.01.00

255 Cousteau Place
Davis, CA 95618
RE:

Davis, CA 95616
Dear Mr. Slayton,

liters for PCM sampling. A total of two (2) samples were collected from the Northeast Corner of
Classroom 0228 and shipped via FedEx to EMSL Analytical, Inc., for analysis.
s (EPA
office.
MULMSLNS
Anthony M. De Arcos
35600
EMSL Order:
CustomerID:
CustomerPO:
ProjectID:
EMSL Analytical, Inc.

200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077
Phone/Fax:
(800) 220-3675 / (856) 786-5974
http://www.EMSL.com
cinnasblab@EMSL.com
Attn:
Phone:
Fax:
Received:
Analysis Date:
Collected:
National Analytical Laboratories (NAL)

2201 Francisco Dr.
Ste. 140-261
El Dorado Hills, CA 95762
Project:
041522952
NAL51
(916) 361-0555
(916) 361-0540
08/01/15 12:00 PM
8/1/2015
Edwards / Olson Hall / CAAN 3853
Test Report: Fiber Count by Phase Contrast Microscopy (PCM), NIOSH 7400 Method,
Revision 3, Issue 2, 8/15/94
Sample
3853-8AC
041522952-0001
3853-9AC
Location
Sample Date
Clearance Rm 0228 NE
Corner
Field Blank
Volume
(liters) Fibers Fields
1256.00
<5.5
100
<5.5
100
LOD
(fib/cc)
0.002
Fibers/
mm
<7.01
Fibers/
cc
Notes
<0.002
Field Blank
<7.01
041522952-0002
The results reported have been blank corrected as applicable.
Analyst(s)
Dave Poitras (2)
Benjamin Ellis, Laboratory Manager

or other approved signatory
Limit of detection is 7 fibers/mm. Intra-laboratory Sr values: 5-20 fibers = 0.31, 21-50 fibers = 0.30, 51-100 fibers = 0.25. Inter-laboratory Sr values (Average of EMSL round robin data) = 0.29. EMSL
maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported above and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no
responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. EMSL is not responsible for data reported in fibers/cc,
which is dependent on volume collected by non-laboratory personnel. Results have been blank corrected as applicable. The results in this report meet all requirements of the NELAC standards unless
otherwise noted. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted.
Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Cinnaminson, NJ NYS ELAP 10872, AIHA-LAP, LLC--IHLAP Accredited #100194, NJ DEP 03036, PA ID# 68-00367
Initial report from 08/01/2015 15:30:13

Test Report PCM-7.22.0 Printed: 8/1/2015 3:30:15 PM
THIS IS THE LAST PAGE OF THE REPORT.
Page
NAL LOG-IN RECORD
1 of 1
Login # 35600
Ph: 916.361.0555 Fx: 916.361.0540

Job Site/Job #:

Client#-Lot#
4373 / 745
Date
Classrooms 0101, 0105, 0118, 0125, 0141,

0163 & 0227
Sampling Date:
Davis, CA 95616
Sampling Time
Phone Number
FAX Number
Type of Work:
Contact
Scott Slayton
2505030
E-Mail Address
No. of Samples
Turnaround:
Num.
Sample ID#
Min.
LPM
Volume
3803-8AC
120
10.47
1256.4
Classroom 0228, Northeast Corner / Clearance
3803-9AC
8/3/2015
7/31/2015
PCM Clearance
2
Rush

Denis Edwards
Date/
Time
07/31/15
1645
Date/
Time
Date/
Time
Date/
Time
Due:
7/31/2015
At:
Page 1 Of
Asbestos & Lead Building

Inspection Report For:
Wellman Hall
Room 0027
CAAN #4050 ZONE #B042
Davis, CA
Presented To:
Astrid Senger-Gibbons
UC Davis - Design & Construction Management
225 Cousteau Place
Davis, CA 95618
By:
Anthony M. De Arcos
Certified Asbestos Consultant
(916) 361-0555 Fax: (916) 361-0540
E-Mail: NAL1@NAL1.com Web Page: www.NAL1.com
July 11, 2013
Astrid Senger-Gibbons
UC Davis - Design & Construction Management
225 Cousteau Place
Davis, CA 95618
RE: Asbestos & Lead Inspection Wellman Hall-Room 0027
Dear Ms. Senger-Gibbons,

The following report is in regards to the building inspection completed at the Wellman Hall located at CAAN
#4050 ZONE #B042, in Davis, California. Of the three (3) suspected asbestos containing samples collected two (2)
were found to contain asbestos containing construction materials (ACCM). Of the three (3) suspected lead
containing samples collected one (1) was found to contain Lead Containing Material (LCM). Anthony M. De
Arcos, Certified Asbestos Consultant and Registered Environmental Property Assessor (REPA), conducted the
inspection.
The inspection was completed on July 9, 2013. The inspection was completed according to the EPAs Asbestos
Containing Building Materials (ACBM) In-Schools Rule; 40 CFR 763.85 (Inspection and Re-Inspection).
Currently, EPA regulations classify ACBM as materials containing more that 1-percent (1%) of asbestos. CalOSHA currently regulates asbestos to 1/10th of 1% (0.1%) and requires that a certified asbestos worker conduct this
work.
Based on the sample results the Texture (Sheetrock-Joint Compound is to be considered homogeneous) were found
to contain ACCM. All square footage should be verified by contractor. No destructive sampling was conducted
during the site visit, in the event that future renovation and/or demolition work reveals any unforeseen suspect
materials; the contractor shall contact the project manager for further testing.
The lead suspect samples were collected according to the Housing Urban Development (HUD) Guidelines, the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and California Public Health Department (formally DHS), who regulate
and require the abatement or in-place management of LCM hazards equal to or greater than 1.0 milligram per
square centimeter (1.0 mg/cm2) of lead or more than 0.5% lead by weight. The following regulation shall be
adhered to because OSHA considers all surfaces to contain lead: OSHAs 29 CFR 1926.62, California
Occupational Safety and Health Standard, Title 8 (Cal/OSHA 8 CCR 1532.1).
The samples from the Multi-Colored Paint surfaces were found to contain LCM levels above the OSHA Limit of
Detection. Thus, a certified CPHD (formerly DHS) lead worker and individuals certified by EPA, with Renovator,
Repair and Painting (RRP) designation, must complete any work that will disturb the painted surfaces at the site
including prep, in-place management, and/or abatement.
33047
Wellman Hall
CAAN #4050 ZONE #B042, Davis, CA
July 11, 2013
Page 3 of 5
EMSL Analytical, Inc. (EMSL) in Carle Place, New York, analyzed the bulk suspect asbestos containing samples
utilizing Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) Method and utilizing the SW-846-3050B*/7000B method analyzed the
suspect LCM samples. National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) Certification #10148-10
and California Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (CAELAP) Certification #2339, certifies EMSL.
SECTION I: ASBESTOS BUILDING INSPECTIONFederal and state regulations require that anyone disturbing asbestos containing materials are properly trained
certified and have the required respiratory protection and medical surveillance.
Although not all the rooms or materials throughout the site were sampled, the like materials that were not tested
will be treated as homogeneous to the materials that were tested and will be considered as containing ACCM.
The location and results of suspect samples found to contain ACCM are as follows:
Sample ID#
4050-2
4050-3
Material
Texture
Sheetrock-Joint Compound
Location
Rm 0027, N. Wall
Rm 0027, NW Corner
Condition
PT CT <0.25%
Homogeneous
Material
Results
*Trace,<1% Chrysotile
Homogeneous Material
Based on the regulatory requirements by the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP),
Regulation 40 CFR, Part 61, Subpart M the following must occur If the asbestos content is less than 10 percent,
verification shall be made using the point counting method specified in Appendix A, Subpart F, 40 CFR Part 763,
Section 1.7.2.4, Polarized Light Microscopy, Qualification of Asbestos Content.
Samples found to contain a Trace, <1% amount of Chrysotile asbestos were re-analyzed utilizing the EPA 600/M482-020, Point Count Method to determine if the amount of ACCM is less than or greater than 1%. The results for
the Material sample were found to contain <0.25% asbestos. Based on the results the surface materials will be
treated to contain a Trace <1% Chrysotile asbestos containing construction material (ACCM).
Although neither EPA nor Local County Air Quality regulates materials at <1% level, it does fall under the
jurisdiction of OSHA in regards to worker protection. OSHA regulates the material at 1/10th of 1% [8 CCR-1529
(r) (1) Asbestos Containing Construction Material (ACCM)]. Based on this, the work must be completed by a
certified asbestos contractor. The CONTRACTOR shall be required to call the landfill to verify that they will
accept the waste as general construction debris. If the landfill does not accept the material as general construction
debris, the material shall be REQUIRED to be disposed of as non-friable/non-hazardous material.
The Sheetrock-Joint Compound is to be considered homogeneous and treated as containing Trace <1% Chrysotile.
A certified asbestos abatement contractor must be retained to remove the above materials containing the Trace
(<1%) amount prior to any renovation or demolition work being completed at the site. During the removal of the
materials, the debris will be placed into an open top waste bin. The bin will have ''Asbestos Hazard'' signs posted
around the perimeter of the waste bin. Upon completion of the removal process, the bin will be covered, the signs
will be removed and the debris will be disposed of as general construction debris at a non-regulated waste facility.
NAL recommends that a certified asbestos abatement contractor be retained to remove trace materials prior to any
scheduled renovation/demolition work being completed at the site. Prior to the work process starting a work plan
or specifications in regards to the abatement process should be completed and distributed to the abatement
contractors during the job walk at the site.
33047/33048
Wellman Hall
July 11, 2013
Page 4 of 5
On-Site Observation should be conducted by N.A.Ls Certified Asbestos Consultant or Certified Site Surveillance
Technician to verify that the work plan/specification is being followed. This will verify that during the abatement
work the outside air was clean. Once a certified asbestos contractor has removed the ACCM, following EPA and
OSHA requirements; a visual inspection and air clearance sampling should be completed. Clearances will confirm
that the general contractor can reoccupy the work area(s), without concern for exposure to asbestos airborne fibers
to their employees thus allowing the renovation or demolition work to be completed by the general contractor.
The following samples were non-asbestos containing materials:
Sample ID#
4050-1
Material
2x4 White Acoustical Ceiling Tile
Location
Rm 0027, W. Side Ceiling,
Results
None Detected
SECTION II: LEAD BUILDING INSPECTIONSince the laboratory results are reported by weight percent, during the collection of the suspect LCM samples the
paint must be removed down to, but not including, the bare substrate (wood, metal, etc.). Inclusion of the any
amount of the substrate material in the paint sample will dilute the sample result(s).
Once the determination is made on where the LCM is located, the In-place Management or the Abatement of the
LCM can commence. If the In-Place Management method is to be used, prior to the repainting of the effected
surface areas, the loose flaky paint must be removed until the remaining paint adheres smoothly to the substrate.
Once this task is completed, the surface area can be repainted without the possibility of paint being dislodged and
falling to the floor or ground areas. If the Abatement method of all surfaces is to be completed, then the debris and
any loose flaky paint must be bagged or burrito wrapped prior to the removal of the debris from the work area(s)
and subsequently the site. Because the paint samples listed below were found to contain LCM, all areas where the
LCM will be disturbed will require abatement, encapsulation, and/or prep work by a certified lead worker.
Although not all the rooms or materials were sampled, the like materials that were tested and their results will be
treated as homogeneous and the materials will be treated as containing LCM throughout the site.
The locations and results of the suspect samples found to be LCM are as follows:
Sample ID#
4050-3L
33047/33048
Material
Multi-Colored Paint
Location
Various Sheetrock Walls
Condition
Good
Concentration
% By Weight
0.3%-LCM
Wellman Hall
July 11, 2013
Page 5 of 5
Prior to the demolition work being completed and/or the transporting of the debris from the site, Health and Safety
Code 25157.8 (AB 2784 National Resources) requires that all lead debris be sampled for Waste Characterization.
This will assist the Contractor in making a determination of whether or not the material is to be considered
Hazardous or Non-Hazardous Lead waste or general construction debris. The sequence of testing to be completed
by the Contractor is as follows:
i
i
i
i
i
Total Threshold Limit concentration (TTLC) with a result of 50 mg/kg or more but less than 1,000 mg/kg
of lead must be retested using the Soluble Threshold Limit concentration (STLC) method;
A STLC result of 5.0 mg/L or greater is considered California Hazardous Waste;
Total Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) testing shall only be accomplished when approved by the
Owners Representative; This procedure shall be generally reserved for out-of-state shipments; and A TCLP
result of 5.0 mg/L or more deems the waste Federal RCRA materials; and
The California hazardous waste threshold for total lead using STLC is 5 mg/L and
Lead paint that is intact on a surface does not permit the material to be classed as non-hazardous. Waste
profiling shall be accomplished if the paint contains more than 350 ppm by Flame AAS. Exception:
Metals that are coated with paint are to be recycled.
The following painted surfaces were found to be less than (<) the OSHAs Limit of Detection for LCM:
Sample ID#
4050-1L
4050-2L
Material
Brown/Tan/White Paint
Brown/Tan Paint
Location
Rm 0027, Metal Door Components
Entry Wood Door
Condition
Fair
Fair
Concentration
% By Weight
<0.01%
<0.01%
In order to stabilize the current lead conditions, NAL recommends Lead Certified Workers certified by EPA, with
Renovator, Repair and Painting (RRP) designation, conduct in-place management work of the LCM surfaces
scheduled for renovation/demolition. Once the abatement, in-place management, and/or prep work is completed
and the areas are stabilized, the existing surfaces will be in good condition and not create a health or safety concern
to the workers conducting the general construction work at the site. A Scope of Work and/or specifications should
be utilized to conduct the lead work at the site.
If you have any questions regarding this report or if we can be of further assistance, please contact our office.
Anthony M. De Arcos
Certified Asbestos Consultant
DOSH #92-0261
Certified Lead Inspector/Assessor
CDPH #2406
33047/33048
EMSL Order:
CustomerID:
CustomerPO:

528 Mineola Avenue, Carle Place, NY 11514
Phone/Fax:
(516) 997-7251 / (516) 997-7528
http://www.emsl.com
carleplacelab@emsl.com
Attn:
Project:
ProjectID:
Phone:
Fax:
Received:
Analysis Date:
Collected:
Paula Lee
2201 Francisco Dr.
Ste. 140-261
061307730
NAL51
(916) 361-0555
(916) 361-0540
07/11/13 9:28 AM
7/11/2013
7/9/2013
Wellman Hall: CAAN #4050 ZONE #B042 Davis, CA 95616
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 and/or EPA
600/M4-82-020 Method(s) using Polarized Light Microscopy
Non-Asbestos
Sample
4050-1
061307730-0001
4050-3
061307730-0003
Description
Rm 0027, W.
Side Ceiling/2x4
White Acoustical
Ceil
Appearance
Fibrous
Tan/White
Fibrous
Heterogeneous
30% Cellulose
Rm 0027, NW
Various
Corner/Sheetrock- Fibrous
Joint Compound
Heterogeneous
10% Cellulose
Asbestos
% Non-Fibrous
% Type
50% Non-fibrous (other)
None Detected
15% Ca Carbonate
None Detected
20% Min. Wool
75% Non-fibrous (other)
Analyst(s)
Pedro Calderon (2)
Michelle McGowan, Laboratory Manager

EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no
responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. This report must not be used by the client to claim
product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. Non-friable organically bound materials present a problem matrix and therefore EMSL
recommends gravimetric reduction prior to analysis. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Estimated accuracy, precision and uncertainty data available upon request. Reporting
limit is 1%
Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Carle Place, NY NVLAP Lab Code 101048-10, CA ELAP 2339, NYS ELAP 11469

Test Report PLM-7.28.7 Printed: 7/11/2013 2:44:05 PM
EMSL Order:
CustomerID:
CustomerPO:
ProjectID:

Phone/Fax:
(516) 997-7251 / (516) 997-7528
http://www.emsl.com
Attn:
Phone:
Fax:
Received:
Analysis Date:
Collected:
Paula Lee
2201 Francisco Dr.
Ste. 140-261
Project:
061307730
NAL51
(916) 361-0555
(916) 361-0540
07/11/13 9:28 AM
7/11/2013
7/9/2013
Wellman Hall: CAAN #4050 ZONE #B042 Davis, CA 95616
Test Report: Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Material via EPA 600/R-93/116
and/or EPA 600/M4-82-020. Quantitation using 400 Point Count Procedure
Non-Asbestos
Sample
Description
Appearance
4050-2
Rm 0027, N.
Wall/Texture
Tan/Cream
Non-Fibrous
Heterogeneous
061307730-0002
Asbestos
% Non-Fibrous
Fibrous
10.00% Ca Carbonate
% Type
<0.25% Chrysotile
90.00% Non-fibrous (other)
Analyst(s)
Pedro Calderon (1)

Disclaimer:Some samples may contain asbestos fibers present in dimensions below PLM resolution limits. The limit of detection as stated in the method is 0.25%. EMSL Analytical Inc suggests that
samples reported as <0.25% or none detected undergo additional analysis via TEM. The above test report relates only to the items tested. This report may not be reproduced, except in full, without written
approval of EMSL Analytical Inc. This test report must not be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any agency of the United States Government. EMSL Analytical Inc., bears no
responsibility for sample collection activities, analytical method limitations, or the accuracy of results when requested to separate layered samples. EMSL Analytical Inc., liability is limited to the cost of
sample analysis.The test results contained within this report meet the requirements of NELAC unless otherwise noted. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. Unless requested by the
client, building materials manufactured with multiple layers (i.e. linoleum, wallboard, etc.) are reported as a single sample.
Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Carle Place, NY NVLAP Lab Code 101048-10, CA ELAP 2339, NYS ELAP 11469

Test Report PLMPTC-7.25.0 Printed: 7/11/2013 2:44:05 PM

Paula Lee
2201 Francisco Dr.
Ste. 140-261
Project:
061307726
CustomerID:
NAL51
CustomerPO:
Phone/Fax:
(516) 997-7251 / (516) 997-7528
http://www.emsl.com
Attn:
EMSL Order:
ProjectID:
Phone:
(916) 361-0555
Fax:
(916) 361-0540
Received:
07/11/13 9:28 AM
Collected:
7/9/2013
Wellman Hall: CAAN #4050, Zone #B042, Davis, CA 95616
Test Report: Lead in Paint Chips by Flame AAS (SW 846 3050B*/7000B)
Client Sample Description
4050-1L
Lab ID
Collected
Analyzed
0001
7/9/2013
7/11/2013
4050-2L
Site: Rm 0027, Metal door components/brown/tan white pai

0002 7/9/2013
7/11/2013
4050-3L
Site: Rm 0027, Entry Wood Door/Brown/Tan Paint

0003 7/9/2013
7/11/2013
Lead
Concentration
<0.010 % wt
<0.010 % wt
0.30 % wt
Site: Rm 0027, Various Sheetrock Walls/Multi Colored Pai

Reporting limit is 0.010 % wt based on the minimum sample weight per our SOP. The QC data associated with these results included in this report meet the method QC requirements, unless specifically
indicated otherwise. Unless noted, results in this report are not blank corrected. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. *
slight modifications to methods applied. "<" (less than) result signifies that the analyte was not detected at or above the reporting limit. Measurement of uncertainty is available upon request.
Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Carle Place, NY AIHA-LAP, LLC--ELLAP Lab 102344, CT PH-0249, NYS ELAP 11469

Test Report ChmSnglePrm/nQC-7.21.0 Printed: 7/11/2013 2:31:25 PM
Page 1 of 1
DELTA DEVELOPMENT
August 22, 2014

Facilities, Mechanical / HVAC
University of California
One Shields Avenue
Davis, California 95616
Dear Mr. Torres:

Per your request, I have reviewed additional hazardous material (asbestos/lead) pre-job start and post
project close-out information you provided August 20, 2014. The aforementioned documents are
associated with Olson Hall HVAC System Upgrades, Phase II, in Room 0040, Basement Mechanical
Room (University Project Number 2503800). Two Rivers Demolition commenced site work associated
with the aforementioned project on June 16, 2014 and the University accepted said site work as complete
on June 20, 2014. Olson Hall is located on the UC Davis Campus, in Davis, California.
Deviations from University Asbestos and Lead Remediation specifications (Sections 028200 & 028300),
and the Contractors approved Work and Disposal Plans have complicated Project Close Out. This is due
in part to the Universitys pre-demolition activities which resulted in a lead dust release, and ultimately
changed the Contractors lead work classification from non-trigger task work to lead trigger task work.
The aforementioned deviations include but are not limited to the following: Pre-Job Start Submittals;
Contractors approved Work Plan (means & methods); Contractors approved waste disposal plans; and
University clearance criteria.
This letter identifies pre-job start and post-job completion submittal deficiencies and/or omissions related
to the Universitys Asbestos Remediation Specification (Section 028200) and Lead Remediation
Specification (Section 028300). Said deficiencies and/or omissions listed below must be corrected and
accepted by the Universitys prior to issuing the Contractor final payment. Also, please let me know if
additional documentation is needed to address mid-project modifications to requirements found in the
Universitys Asbestos and Lead Remediation Specifications, including lead clearance criteria and
asbestos / lead disposal.
Asbestos Pre-Job Start & Post Job Completion Submittal Deficiencies and/or Omissions:
2. Laboratory Qualifications: EMSL Analytical, Inc. of San Leandro, California is identified as the
Contractors asbestos laboratory, however, asbestos analysis reports have not been provided.
Contractor shall submit asbestos analysis reports.

Phone (916) 631-1400 Fax (916) 631-0200
DELTA DEVELOPMENT

August 22, 2014
Page Two
Contractor shall provide Asbestos Project Close Out information identified in Project Close-Out
Requirements, Section 028200 Asbestos Remediation Specification, 3.15. Close Out
documentation shall pertain to actual work performed, not proposed work, and clarify deviations
from project specifications and approved Work and Disposal Plans, including means and
methods, and waste packaging / transportation / disposal.
4. Contractors statement titled 3.15 Project Close-Out, which was provided on Two Rivers
Demolitions letterhead, states All asbestos was turned over to the University for disposal per
John Nichols of Delta Development. The aforementioned statement is false and must be
removed from the Contractors Close Out documentation. Neither John Nichols or Delta
Development directed the Contractor to deviate from the approved waste disposal plan.
Furthermore, Asbestos Project Close Out documentation should accurately reflect waste disposal
and any deviations from approved Exhibit 21 Asbestos Waste Disposal Plan.
5. Exhibit 22 Asbestos As-Built Summary is incomplete with regard to waste disposal and
transportation, and states See attached document Asbestos Waste. However, the
aforementioned Asbestos Waste document was not provided. Contractor shall provide waste
disposal and transportation information requested in Exhibit 22 Asbestos As-Built Summary,
Section 028200 Asbestos Remediation Specification.
Lead Pre-Job Start & Post Job Completion Submittal Deficiencies and/or Omissions:
2. Recycler weight tickets include slips from Sims Metal, however, Sims Metal is not the recycler
identified in the Contractors approved disposal plan. Additionally, recycler weight tickets
appear to include materials not associated with the Olson Hall project. Contractor shall clarify.

Phone (916) 631-1400 Fax (916) 631-0200
DELTA DEVELOPMENT

August 22, 2014
Page Three
Contractor shall provide Lead Project Close Out information identified in Project Close-Out
Requirements, Section 028300 Lead Remediation Specification, 3.15. Close Out documentation
shall pertain to actual work performed, not proposed work, and
clarify deviations from project specifications and approved Work and Disposal Plans, including
means and methods and waste handling. Identify all waste streams, and account for waste hazard
classification / packaging / transportation / disposal.
4. Contractors statement titled 3.15 Project Close-Out was provided on Two Rivers Demolitions
letterhead, and states Materials were hauled off by Two Rivers Demolition Inc. and transported
to Schnitzer Steel Products. Identify the materials hauled to Schnitzer Steel Products.
Additionally, transport vehicles observed on site were marked as Primoris Demolition, not Two
Rivers as stated in Project Close Out documentation. Contractor shall clarify.
5. Exhibit 25 Lead As-Built Summary is incomplete with regard to waste disposal and
transportation, and states See attached document Lead Waste. However, the aforementioned
Lead Waste document was not provided. Contractor shall provide waste disposal and
transportation information requested in Exhibit 25 Lead As-Built Summary, Section 028300 Lead
Remediation Specification. Be sure to account for all waste streams, including, but not limited to
dust, vacuum debris, decontamination materials and supplies, and personal protective equipment.
If you have questions regarding information included in this letter please contact me at (916) 631-1400.
Thank you for the opportunity to serve you.
Sincerely,
John M. Nichols
Certified Lead Consultant, 2839
Certified Asbestos Consultant, 92-0039
Cc:
Tom Emme, UCD

Cynthia Hongola, UCD

Phone (916) 631-1400 Fax (916) 631-0200
2620 Mercantile Drive, Rancho Cordova, CA 95742

T: (916) 638-6775 / F: (916) 638-0511
CSLB # 726647
ASBESTOS WASTE
All of the Asbestos waste was taken by UC Davis EH&S Department to their containers on site where it was
properly labeled and manifested with other asbestos waste.

UC Davis Asbestos Analysis

Încărcat de

Informații document

Drepturi de autor

Formate disponibile

Partajați acest document

Partajați sau inserați document

Opțiuni de partajare

Vi se pare util acest document?

Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

UC Davis Asbestos Analysis

Încărcat de

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

November 25, 2013

Mr. Greg Secor

Transmitted via email:gsecor@ucdavis.edu

Asbestos and Lead Surveys for Seismic V Project

Dear Mr. Secor:

Flooring & Associated Adhesives

UC Davis Seismic V; Asbestos & Lead Paint Surveys

Asbestos Bulk Sample Results

Tar and Gravel

Roof Patching Mastic

Drywall & Joint

Wall Texture on Drywall

Drywall & Joint

UC Davis Seismic V; Asbestos & Lead Paint Surveys

White Painted Rolled

Brown Base Adhesive

Epoxy Floor and Red

Tile: No Asbestos Detected

Adhesive: No Asbestos Detected

Epoxy: No Asbestos Detected

Old Control Room

Tile: No Asbestos Detected

Old Control Room

Tile: No Asbestos Detected

Texture: No Asbestos Detected

VFD Room Hallway

Tile: No Asbestos Detected

At Soffits and Roof

Stucco: No Asbestos Detected

Terrazzo: No Asbestos Detected

Concrete: No Asbestos Detected

Caulking: No Asbestos Detected

Brown Base Adhesive

Adhesive: No Asbestos Detected

Tile: 2% Chrysotile Asbestos

Grout: No Asbestos Detected

UC Davis Seismic V; Asbestos & Lead Paint Surveys

Drywall & Joint

Roof Patching Mastic

Mastic: No Asbestos Detected

Tile: No Asbestos Detected

Tile: No Asbestos Detected

Mastic: No Asbestos Detected

Tar: 10% Chrysotile Asbestos

Membrane: No Asbestos Detected

2nd Floor Shop at

Membrane Roofing, Felt

Middle of Main Roof

Around Windows and at

Caulking: No Asbestos Detected

Top of Roof Seams

Caulking: No Asbestos Detected

Grey Window Putty

Putty: No Asbestos Detected

Silver Foil with

Mastic: No Asbestos Detected

Roof Patching Mastic

Mastic: No Asbestos Detected

Plaster: No Asbestos Detected

Wall Texture: 2% Chrysotile Asbestos

Insulation: 10% Amosite Asbestos

UC Davis Seismic V; Asbestos & Lead Paint Surveys

Acoustic Plaster with

Stairwells and Center