Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
By
,
EDGARDO M. VILLAREAL II
BS Psych ology , Far Eaetern U nive rsity
Bache/or ofLaws, Pa ma ntasan ng Lungsod nil' Mayn tla
Lcuu Professor, J ose Rizal Uni versity
Lectu rer, City College of Ma nila
Member, IBP - Manila IV
FIRST EDITION
2002
,\ ',1.....,
f....
' '' '.....'.,,,
" *\"/~\"f~l"'~
" f'..+." (f*", " '~ " ":\' ~
..::::.c:.,.::
_ "'>
~ ": .,....-c:.., .... .. ,, "'""'<:, .
_"''''''',._"'",
~- .. ....
~~~
.
,.,,~
~
."
.'
~ .... :
..<i'E
-....,.
~<l}S
~ ...,~
_.
:.::," ,1
'I'
~"'..
".J" ~~
-.,
. .. .
":l'"
'.,';, \.., 1\.' ,". '. ~
'~'", . ~:
".
.:
~I.
;;:\
~~fl
ee..
~~
o'
: "," ~
. wWw.reldnteractlve.com -
~ I)E...",
"'i:'
' rta;.., lJ,~"'.....''''A\'''*''''~~~
-....,e
"..fA~ ii',.L";'.....
.oe ,..:::?,<tJt
.... '1"... e::..... ..... ;Lo:,.~ .. ..:<t:,'" <..
~ ., .:Y"/.l ~JI"'''O,t.y~"\V.IJ,'i:'if'JJ .\~ "\'J,, \.TJ'
,.
~ .. .. -
.\T,
y", \
Any copy of thi s book without the corresponding number and the signature of th e
author on this page either proceeds from an
illegitimate sou rce or is in possessionof one who
has no authority to dispos e of th e lame.
"iY
597 4
Prln'edby
iii
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The author ac knowledges the invaluable su pport a nd
guida nce give n by hi s tw o di stingui sh ed profes sors Dean
Ed uard o J .F.Abella and Judge Noli C. Diaa in the preparati on
of th is book.
Likewise to Atty. Car los M. Car los a nd Atty. Ma. Adela
Lucido, my research staff.
May everyone find wisdom in reading thi s book.
God bless us all.
I
I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cha pter I
INTRODUCTION
1.
2.
3.
4.
1
4
6
6
Ch a p t e r II
3.
11
14
Ch ap te r III
NATURE OF TIlE LEGAL PROFESSION
1.
2.
3.
4.
Practice of la w is a Profession
Three idea s inv olved in a profe ssion
Legal Profession; a privilege a nd 8 right
Standa rds of the legal profession
15
16
16
17
Ch a p te r IV
PRACTICE OF LAW
1.
2.
21
30
3.
4.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
1.
32
35
39
51
2.
3.
4.
52
5.
6.
7.
53
Chapter X
liAR EXAMINATIONS
D1SCIPLINAHY PHOCEEDINGS
54
2.
3.
GETTING STARTED
I.
64
64
1.
2.
3.
viii
119
122
2.
3.
66
77
84
Chapter XIII
C ha p ter VIII
108
2.
62
104
107
107
101
101
103
C hap tcr XI
55
56
56
58
60
Ch a plcr VII
1.
Concept ...................................................................
Purpose of In te gra tion ...........................................
Powe r to Inte gra te the Bar ... .................................
Constit utionality oflhe move to
integrate the bar ..... ................................. ......
Mem bership in the IBP ..... .................... ................
Organization ..................... ............... ..... ................ ..
Administrative Su pervision of the Supreme
Court over the Pres ident of the IBP .............
Ch a p lcr VI
85
Chapter IX
Ch a p ter V
1.
31
II
125
131
150
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
155
164
176
182
..
187
Chapter I
1.
.
.
.
........
190
203
205
207
APPENDICES
Chapter XVI
SOME BASIC LEGAL PRINCIPLES
AND MAXIMS
RULE 138-A
RULE 139
RULE 139A
RU LE 139B
REPUBLlC ACT NO. 7662
BAR MATTER 730
Chapter XV
PRACTICAL TIPS FOR LAW STUDENTS
APPENDIX "'N APPENDIX "B" APPENDlX "C" APPENDlX "D" AP PENDlX "E" APPENDIX "F" APPENDIX "G" AP PENDl X "II " -
INTRODUCTION
..
.
.
..
.
.
..
22 1
22 2
23::\
234
237
245
252
259
U :GAL rROt'F.3SION
INTH(lUUCTION
hap s , is d ue to the fact that a la wye r has a diversity of oppcrtunitiea aw aiting him. As a ma tter of fact. most of ou r national and local leade rs come from the lega l profession. In the
govern me nt, la wye rs enj oy first grade civi l se rvice eligibility
under R.A. No. 1080 where knowledge of law is a pre-requisite. For t hat matte r. a lawyer need not take a ny other civil
se rvice exam ination. Military and police personnel take up
law for career adva ncement. Incidentally, u nder the PN P
Reform Act, one uf the requiremen ts for pro motion is educationa l ad vancement, which includes study of la w. Lawyers can
also be fou nd in bu sinesses occupying top exec utive positions.
Even one who is not rea lly bout on indu lging in law practice
as a career, stil l would want to have a ba ckground on it since
mere kn owled ge of law if! certai nly a n a dvantage.
Althou gh la wyers are be ing looked up to by the community, they a rc not necessarily liked by many. Somc individuals
do not trust lawyers beca use they e ither categorize them as
big-mout hed crocod iles wa iting for a prey or a "J udas" willin g
to sell his mas ter for some silver coins. Ad mittedly, th e re a re
some mem bers who are disgrace to the profes sion but they do
not constit ute t he whole nor t he greater majo rity. The se a re
para sites that do not possess ethical standa rds required of
every me mber of t he bar. But what kin d of profession may
claim 0 h und red percent puri ty? Definitely the answer to this
question is none. Evcn the rel igious profession sometimes is
ta inted with Ir regularities. J ust like in a ny ot her profession
where there a re misfits , the legal profess ion is not exe mpted.
Another mi sconception about t he legal profession is that
there are too many la wyers in the Ph ilip pines an d that since
those ru n ni ng the affai rs of the gove rnment are mostly lawyers or h a ve la wyers 8 S consultants , ou r nation is facing a
bla nk wa ll towards prowess. Th ey were cla iming that if lawycrs can not agree on a certa in provision of la w in view of their
different opinion s or interpretations, how could they agree on
th e a ppro priate program to be used for t he country's de velopmen t? For sure the re are misguid ed cit izens of our country,
yet whatever they say no matter ho w erroneous it may be,
lawyers will always respec t their ri gh t to say it. This is how
8 la wyer is trained for TCSPl"C t to everyone's freedom of
expression .
LEGAL PROFESSIO N
Nature of an Attorney
An atto rney, who is sometimes called a n advocate or cou nsel, is one wh o aids in the a dministration of justice . The te nn
"attorney" is genera lly understood as having refer en ce to a
class of pe rsons who are by license constituted officers of courts
of justice, a nd who are empowere d to appear a nd prosecute
and/or defend so meone a nd on whom peculiar d uties, responsibili ties and liabilities are devolved by law in consequencc . It
has also been said th at a person acting professionally in legal
fonnalities, negotiations or proceedings, by warrant or authori ty of hi s client. is an attorney at la w within the usual
meaning of the te rm. An atto rney may in short be defined as
a pe rson se t apart by the laws of the land relating to the h igh
interest of pro perty, li berty and life. An attorney at law is
thus considered as a qu a si-officer of the court su bject to regulation. He is a n inh erent element in our jud icia l syste m.
Although , an attorney may ,,11m be defined as som eon e
who is employed by a party in a ca use to manage the sa me for
him, it ha s been held in a long li ne of ease s that a lawyer is
INT RODUCTION
3.
88
a Subject
4.
LEGAL PROFKC;SrON
The four-year la w cou rse put emphasis on the bar subj ects listed under Sec. 6, Ru le 138 of the Rules of Court: civil
la w, crimina l la w, remed ia l la w, legal ethics and practical
exercises, commercia l law, political la w, ta xati on, la bor la ws,
la w on publi c corpora t ion a nd pub lic officers, public a nd private inte rnational Jaw. The curric ulum al so contains non-bar
s ubjects like legal hi story, legal bibliography, stat utory construction, legal research, lega l medicine and court practice
among oth ers. In 1989, th e Department of Education Culture
n nd Sports a dopted a revised model curriculu m for the fouryear Bachelor of Laws degree composed of 5 1 subjects (approximately 124 units) which took effect i.i 1990. It olTered
more su bjects on the lega l profession . legal couns eling, legal
r esea rch and legal writing.
Chapter II
THE STUDY OF LAW
1.
R.')(),
11
Dreams / Ambition
P erseverance
'>
LF.G AL PRO}o'f':SSION
13
I
I
c)
Patience
La nguage
to us . In fact, we have been taught of the English langu age since our primary school d ay s, Thus, it is ofte n
sa id th a t the study of la w must h a ve to start from ou r
early school da ys .
La nguage is a matter ofhabit.1b learn to U Re it is to
develop communication skills . Sin ce lan guage is no longer
in cluded in the la w school curri cu lum, you h a ve to exe rt
extra effort if you feel you still hav e to improve your communicetion ski lls. You ca n im prove you r langu a ge skills
by wid e reading a nd listening, keen perception and constant spea ki ng a nd writing. All these three compo ne nts of
the formula must Le sim ultaneous ly pursued. On e ma y be
r ead ing the langu a ge constantly but if he does no t have
keen perceptions of correct constructi ons and usages, his
le arning process may not be effecti ve. And even if he has
ke en perceptions , since language is ba sically skill , if he
does not cons tantly use it by writing it or speaking it, the
same ineffectiveness is the result.f
b)
Law
This is the only tool in the law s tud y that one will
learn in the la w school. 1b know the law, on c mu st re ad
3Gupit, Id.
14
IS-GAL
PROFE.~SION
Chapter III
NATURE OF TH E LEGAL PROFESSION
t pas lliflll t h l' Bar and 1M New La~N, Au y. I.eon Asa. Publish ed in
1.
15
LEGAL PROFESSI ON
16
3.
3.
' In
4Jn re Syci p, 92 SC RA 1.
17
re
19
1. Independence. A lawyer's re lation to h is client en tails ethi ca l problems. Lawyers a rc not hired guns ou t to do
their client's biddi ng. They are professiona ls, wh o mu st accordingly conduct th emselves in a professional way. 1b be su re,
a la wyer owes en ti re devotion and loyal ty to hi s client. But it
is devotion a n d loya lty with in the bounds of honor. As the
Code of Professional Responsib ility puts it, 8 lawyer (must)
rep re sen t h is cli en t with zeal wit h in the bou nds of t he la w"
J ustice Bra nd ei'e ad vice to young lawyers was that th ey should
hav e clien ts rat h er t h a n be somcbody's lawyer.
K
1,
I'
20
LEGA L PIH.WESSI ON
unique challe nge to a la wyer 's integrity 8 S well as his com petence and ability a nd offers psychi c benefits that go beyond
pesos and centavos.
3.
Learn ing . The Code of Profession al Responsibili ty
states that " a la wyer (m ust) Herve his client with compete nce
and dili gen ce." But a bar to be a ble to discharge its public
d uties a nd responsibilities mu st be a learned organization.
The proliferation of legal ma te rial s an d the emergen ce of ne w
specialti es in la w, brought a bout by the growing complexi ty of
our society, are a cha lle nge to ou r commitme nt to excellence
_ whether as members of th e pra cticing ba r of the acade mic
branch of the pro fession.
The foregoing cri teria or standa rds of the lega l profession given and discu ssed by Mr. Justice Mendoza , may be too
short of a discussion . Yet, it is a great challenge not only to
those who M e a spiring to be come members of the learned
profession but also to those who are already part of it . As fina l
word s, he stressed that: "Th e bar must be able to commu nicate to the pub lic its aims a nd purposes. It mu st be able to
expl ain to lay people the la ws a nd regu lation s in clear, sim ple
and understandab le language 8 0 th at pub lic re spect for the
la w will be fostered. This is a n endeavor through wh ich the
learn ing of the bar must be channeled."
Chapter IV
PRACTICE OF LAW
I.
The te rm "prac tice of la w" is incapable of exact definition . Whether a pa rt icula r a ctivity com es with in the meaning
of the term will depend upon the facts or attenda nt circumstances of the case ta king into se rious cons ide ra tion the gen eral principles and doctrines laid down by the court regarding
th e su bject mat ter. It usually involves t he carrying on of the
calling of an attorney, usu ally for com pe nsation, acting in a
re presen tative capacity a nd rendering service to another.'
Bla ck's Law Dictionary defines practice of law a s the
rendition of se rvices req uiri ng the k nowl ed ge and the a pplication of lega l principles and techniqu e to se rve the inte rest of
a not her with h is consent. It is not limited to a ppea ri ng in
court or advising or assisti ng in the conduct of litigation. bu t
embraces the preparation of pleadings , and other papers incident to actions and special proceedings, conveya ncing, th e
preparation of legal instrumen ts of a ll kinds , and the ~>ivin g
of lega l ad vice to clien ts . It embraces a ll ad vice to clients a nd
a ll actio ns taken for t hem in matters con nected with the law.
An a t to rney engages in the "pr acti ce of law " by maintaining
an office where he is held out to he a n a ttorney, using a letterhead describing himself as an attorney, counseli ng clie nts
in lega l matters , negoti a ting with opposing counsel a bout
pen d ing litiga tion, a nd fixing a nd collecting feee for services
rendered by his associato.t Therefore, based on the foregoing,
lPeoplc va . Villanueva , 14 SCRA 109 ,
2Blac k1I JAW Diction ary, 5t.h Ed ition .
21
PRACTICf': OF l.AW
22
2.
Occa sional dra fting of si m ple deeds a nd other legal instru ments however, when not conducte d 8S an occupa tion h as
been held not to cons titute the pra ctice of law. Neither if the
prepara tion of such work invol ves on ly the clerical labor of
fillin g in the bla nks on a read y mad e fonn or a mere mechanical act of copying from a file or finished document which involved no legal thing."
Justice P adilla, in h is d issenting opinion in the case of
Cayetano vs. Monsod, C .R. No. 100113, Septe mber 3, 1991
(201 SCRA 2 10), gives the following crite ria for t he practice of
law :
Habituality, The "term prac tice of la w" implies cus1.
toma rily or habitually holding onese lf out to the
pub lic as a law yer (People vs. Villanueva , 14 SCRA
109, citi ng S tate vs. Boyen, -4 S.E. 522, 98 N.C. 644)
such as when one sends a circu la r a nnouncing t he
establish ment of a la w office for the general practice of la w (U .S. vs . Ney Bosq ue , 8 Phil. 146 ), or
whe n on e takes a n oath of office as a lawyer before
a notary pu blic, a nd files a manifestation with the
Su pre me Court informing it of his intention to pr actice law in a ll cou rts of th e country. (Pe ople vs . De
Lun a, 102 Ph il. 96 8 ).
practice of la w if he is cus tomari ly or habitua lly holdin g hi mself out to th e publ ic 8S 8 la wyer. and demanding payment for
such services. The appe arance of coun sel on one occasion is
not conclusively determ in ative of e ngageme nt in the practi ce
of law. Prepa ring documents an d renderi ng legal services a re
within the term pra ctice of law.3
'"
23
LEGAL PROFESSI ON
3.
Applica tion of law, legal pri nci ple, pra ctice , or proced ure which calls for legal k nowled ge , tra ining a nd
expe rience is within the term "pract ice of la w."
(Ma rti n, supra).
4.
Attorney -client relationship. Enga ging in the pra ctice of la w pr esu pposes the existence of la wyer-client rela tionship. He nce, wh ere a la wyer undertake s
a n activity which req uires k now ledge of law bu t
in volve" no attorney-clien t re lationsh ip, s uch a s
teachi ng la w or wri ting la w books or articles, he
ca nnot be said to be engaged in the practice of his
profession a s a la wyer. (Agpu lo, l.igal Eth ics , 1989
Ed ., p. 30)."
Ic
24
8S 8
lawyer, for compensation as a source of livelihood or in conside ration of his s e rvi ce.f Moreover, it is more than bll isola ted
a ppeara nce for it consi sts of frequent or customa ry actions , a
PRACTICE OF LAW
ThUR, th e givi ng of legal a dvice for compensation rega rding th e legal status a nd rights of another a nd one's conduct
with res pect th ereto constit ute s pra ctice of la w. One who
renders an opinion as to th e prope r interpret ation of a statute , a nd receives pay for it, is to th at exte nt practicing law.
Providing infonna tion about foreign la ws on marriage, divorce
a nd adoption which e ntails explaining to th e client the intricacies of the law a nd advi sing him or her on the proper course
of action falls squa re ly with in the juri sp, uden ti al definiti on of
th e practice of law. to
CAYETANO VB . MONSO
201 SCRA 210
Facts:
Petitioner ques tioned the a ppointment of here in responde nt a s Cha innan of th e Commission on Elections
(COMELEC ) for lack of the necessary qu alifi ca tion of
having been engaged in the practice of law for at least
ten (10) years, It was establis hed that a fte r graduating
from th e College of Law and having hurdled th e bar,
respondent worked in the law office of hi s father for a
short while , th en worked as a n operati ons officer in the
World Bank Group for a bout two years , which involved
getting acquainted with the laws of member-countries ,
negotiating loans and coordinati ng legal , economic and
project work of the Bank. Upon returning to th e Philippin es , he worked with the Meralco G rou p, served as chief
execut ive officer of an investment bank a nd has subseque nt ly worked either as chief executive officer or con sultant of various compa nies . He was a lso nam ed a s
Sec reta ry-Ge ne ral a nd la te r Nati onal Chai r man of
NAM FREL, whi ch made him knowledgeable in election
la ws. He a ppeared for NAMFREL in its accre ditation
heari ngs before t he Commission. He a lso claimed to ha ve
work ed with th e unde rprivileged sector s, a nd was also a
member of the Daoide Commission as well as the Const itutional Commission.
ft/d .
9/d .
25
Lt;GAL PR(\!"ESSJO N
26
Issue:
whether or not re sp ondent POSse!:!!1 the requirement
of 10 year practice of law'!
Held:
Interpreted in the light of the various definitions of
the term practice of law particularly the mod ern concept
of la w practice, a nd taking in to consideration th e liberal
construction in te nded by th e framers of t he Const itu tion,
Atty. Mon sod's pa st work experiences a s a la wye r-economi st, 8 la wyer-m a nage r, 8 lawyer-ent re p ren eu r of industry, 8 la wyer-negoti a to r of contracts, a nd a la wyer-legisla to r of both the rich a nd the poor, verily more th an
satisfy the constitutional requirement that one must be
engaged in the practice of law for a t lea st ten ( 10) years.
This decision of the Su preme Court wa s high ly criticized by many, among t hem a re some members of the
Court who wrote their d issenting opinions:
Justice Padilla stressed that "pra ct ice" - refers to
the actual performance or application of knowledge as
distingu ished from mere possession of knowledge; it connotes a n act ive, habitual, repeated cus toma ry action .II Th
"practice" la w, or any profe ssion for that matter, means
to exercise or pursue an employment or p rofession actively, habitually, repeatedly or customarily.
The refore, a doctor of medicine who is e mployed
a nd is habitually perfonning the tasks of a nursing aide,
cannot be said to be in the "practi ce of medicine: A certified public a ccountant who wor ks ae a clerk, cannot be
sa id to practice his profession as an acco u ntant, In t he
same way, a lawyer who is em ployed as a bu siness executive or a corporate manager, other than as head or
attorney of a lega l depa rtment of a corpora tion or a governme n tal agency, cannot be said in the practi ce of la w.
PHACTI C~:
OF LAW
27
Despite co mplex opinion on the mat ter, a nd regardless of which view a la wyer may favor, sett led is t he rule
that under the doctrine of sta re decisis, every one must
a dhe re to the controlling decision of t he Su preme Court.
28
LEGAL PROFESSI ON
(Au thor's note : Th e fore going dissen t by the J u stices was presented only for aca demic purposes without
any ill intent ion whatsoever, a lthough, th e dissent of th oec
J ustices a re conceded ly very sou nd opinions which ca ll
for serious con side ra tion.)
ULEP
VB.
J'RACTI CE OF LAW
LEGAL
CLINIC, INC.
Facts:
Petit ioner asked the Court to direct respo ndent to
cease a nd desist from issuing a dvertise me nts simila r to
or of th e same te nor 88 th at wh at respondent did an d
further a sked the Court. to perpetually prohibit persons
or enti ties from ma kin g adv ertisements pertaini ng to the
exercise of the la w profession othe r than those all owed
by law.
Th e a dvertisements com plai ned of by the petitio ner
a re a s follows :
29
Issue:
SECRET MARRIAGE?
Held:
Yes , it is cons idered
a dvertisi ng is prohibited.
8S
30
LEG."J . PROn;SSION
In providing infonnation about foreign laws on marri age, divorce a nd ad opt ion , th e corporation , with its
at torneys and para legals will necessarily h ave to explai n
to th e clien t the intrica cies of th e law a nd advise him/her
on the p ro pt~r course of a ction to take 8S may be provided
by sa id law. The act ivity fa lls squarely with in th e jurispruden t ial defin iti on of "practice of law,"
Pl tACTICE OF I.AW
the lega l effects of facts and condit ions , or when ever such acts
involve t he use of skill and inte llect by a lega l mind tra ined
a nd schooled in a legal schoo l of learning likewise doe s not
cons ti t ute pra ct ice or law. Hence, if s u ch work involves only
the cle rical la bor of filling in the bla nks on ster eot yped fonn
or a mere mechan ical act of copying from a file copy or finished document which involves no lega l thing, is not cons idered leg ul practico.P
3.
Gratuitou s furni shing of legal ai d to the poor a nd unfort una tes who a re in pursuit of a ny civil remedy, as a matter of
charity, does not constitute practice of la w, The mere records
of realty to ascertain what they may disclose wit hout giving
a ny opinion or advice a s to t he legal effects of wha t they may
be found, does not con stitute th e practice of la w. Also a n ordina ry preparation a nd drafting of lega l instru me nts which
does not involve th e de terminat ion by a trai ned lega l mind of
31
CoulI~/inll. p . 7.
l bi,i .
"CiU'd in AKVSlo, ugal fo.'/Aic&. 9'.! Ed ., p . 47.
Chapter V
ADMISSION TO PRACTICE
I.
.'
..
70%
71%
1953
72%
1954
73 %
1955
74%
b)
c)
l i n ~ C une na n, 94 Phil. 53 4.
21d.
32
Fac ts :
a)
The legisla ture (Congress of the Philippines ), in the exercise of its police power may, however, enact laws regulating
the practice ofla w to protect the pu blic a nd promote th e public
33
ti
34
ADMISSION TO PRAcnCE
Hel d :
2.
3.
4.
35
2.
Integration of th e Bar
2.
3.
4.
5.
Provide a forum for the discussi on of la w, j uri sprudence, law re form. pleading, practice and procedure,
a nd the re la ti on!'! of the Bar to the Bench a nd to the
public, a nd publish informa tion relating thereto;
6.
7.
8.
t,
ee
ADMISSION TO PRACTICE
I.F..GAL PROfES.<\lON
2.
3.
14.
37
4.
Shield the judiciary, which tradit ionally can not defend itself except wit hin its own forum, from the
assaults that politics and self-interest may level at
it, and assist it to main tai n its in te grity, im partial ity a nd independen ce;
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
Facts.
Repu blic Act No. 6397 enti tle d "An Act Providi ng
for the Integra tion of the Philippine Bar and Appropriating Funds Therefore" was passed in Se pte mber 1971,
ordaining "Within t wo yea rs from the a pproval of thi s
Act , the Supreme Court may a dopt rules of court to e ffeet the integration of the Philippine Bar: The Su preme
Court formed a Comm ission on Bar Integration a nd in
Decem ber 19 72, the Commission ea rnestly recomme n de d
the in tegration of the bar. The Court accepted all comments on the proposed in tegr ation.
Issues:
1.
2.
3.
Held:
In ru ling on the issues raised. the Court firs t ad opted
the definiti on given by th e Commission to "Inte gra ti on"
in this wise: "Inte grat ion of the Philip pine Ba r mea ns
the officia l uni fication of the entire lawyer populat io n of
the Phili ppin es . This req uir es mem bership a nd fina ncia l
support. (in reasonable a mount) of every attorney 8S con di tions sine qua non to the practi ce of la w and the re tention of his na me in the Roll of At torneys of the Su pre me
38
LEGA L PROFE~SION
On the first issue, the Court held that it may integrate the Bar in the exercise of its powe r "to pro mulgate
rules concerning ple ading, practice, and procedure in all
courts, and the admissi on to the pr actice ofla w." Indeed ,
the power to integrate is an inherent p urt of the Court's
constit u tional a utho ri ty over the Bar.
The seco n d issu e h inges on th e follo wing cc ns t itu tion al rights: freedom of associa tion and of s peech, as
well as t he n ature of the dues exacted from the law yer,
i.e., whether or not the Court t hus levies a tax. Th e
Cou rt held :
1.
In te gration is not viola tive of fr eedom of e seociation because it doc s not compel a la wyer to become a
member of a ny grou p oi which he ill n ot a lready a m em be r. All t hat it doc", is "to provide a n officia l nati ona l
organizati on for the well-defined but unor ganized and
in cohesive grou p of which every la wye r is a lready a
member!' The la wye r too is not com pe lled to a ttend
meetings , particip ate in activities, etc . The on ly cornp ul si on is the payment of annua l du es. As s um ing , however,
that it does com pe l n la wyer to be a member of the in -
39
As to the thi rd issue, the Cou rt beli eves in th e ti meliness of the in te gration . Survey sh owed an overwhelmin g majori ty of lawyers wh o fa vor ed integration.
3.
2.
3.
4,
5.
M ust prod uce before the Supreme Court sat isfactory evidence of h is good moral ch a racter and no
charges against hi m , involvin g moral turpitude , hav e
been filed or are pending i n any court of the Ph il IppmeR.
o
..
Aside fro m sat isfyi ng the foregoin g enu mera t ion to prove
that the a pplica nt ha s the required educational, moral a nd
40
Well -settled is the rul e tha t good moral cha racter is not
only a cond ition precedent for a dmission to the legal profession, but it must al so remain intact in order to maintain on e's
good sta nding in th e exclusive and honored fra te rn ity. There
is perhaps no profession a fte r that of t he sacred ministry in
wh ich a high -toned morality is more imperative than that of
law. A lawyer is e xpected a t all times to uphold t he inte gri ty
and di gnity of the legal profession by fai thfully performi ng his
duties to society, to th e bar, to the courts of j ustice a nd to his
clients . Exa cted from him, as a member of the profession
charged wit h the responsibility to sta nd as a shield in the
defense of what is right, a re such positi ve qu alities of dece ncy;
truthfulness and responsibility tha t hav e been compen diou sly
described as "moral cha racter." 1b a ch ieve such en d, every
lawyer needs to strive a t all times to honor a nd maintain the
dignity of his professi on , a nd thus improve not on ly the public
regard to the Bar but a lso t he a dm inistra tion of justice. IO
Thus, attorneys m ust contin ue to a dhe re to the sta nda rds of men tal and mora) fitnes s se t up for the pra ctice of
la w. 11
Only natural persons are a llowed to practi ce la w in view
of the req uire men ts imposed by t he ru les. A corporat ion ca nnet be orga nized for, or engage in , t he pract ice of law in th is
country.12 The underlying roaann why a juridical person ca n~n
8/ 11
ea
not practice law lief! on the n ature of the privilege and on the
con fide nt ial a nd trus t rel a ti on be t ween a Uorney a nd client, a s
sa tis facto ri ly s how that they ha ve regula rly studied law for
four years, an d success fu lly complete d a ll prescribed courace
in law school or university officially a pproved a nd recognized
by the Secretary of Educa tion. The a ffidavit of the candidate ,
a ccom pa nied by a certificate from the uni versity or school of
law, shall be filed 8 S evidence of such facts, a nd furt her evidence may be required by th e court.
42
well a s the condi tion required for membershi p in the bar, such
as possession of good moral character, taking of a n oath. a nd
be ing su bject to court's d is cipline. Hut a cor porati on rna)' hi re
a lawyer a s its in -hou se or retai ner cou nse l.
Further, the pra ct ice of la w is reserved onl y to Filipino
citi zen s wh o have success fully hurdled the bar. The present
Cons titution provid es tha t "The practi ce of a ll profession s in
th e Philippines shall be limited to Fili pino citize ns, sa ve in
cases provided by law."13 It is ba sed on public policy since an
alie n cannot ma in tain a llegiance to t he Ph ilippi ne Government which is one of the duties of a lawye r.
By way of exce ption to the rul e that only Filipino citizens may practi ce la w, Sections 3 of Rule 138 pro vide s that:
"Citi zen s of the United S tates of Ame rica who, before
July 4, 1946, were duly licensed mem bers of the Philippine
Bar, in a ctive practice in the cou rts of the Philippines a nd in
good a nd regul ar standing as such, may upon satisfacto ry
proof of these facts before the Suprem e Court, be allowed to
continue such practi ce a fte r taking the oath of office. U
Furthe r, educational requirement is esse ntia l to the due
performance of the duties of a la wyer. It mu st be borne in
mind that the lawyer is entr us ted the delicate t a sk to protect
the life , liberty, property or honor of another. Giving such task
to on e who is not com pete nt may create chao s in th c society.
It is therefore the dem ands of public policy that those see king
admissi on to the pract ice of la w must not onl y possess the
required edu cational qu ali fica tions but must a lso show s uch
degree of lea rn ing and proficie ncy in law for t he proper perforrnance of his tasks ."
Under Section 5 of Rule 138 , "All a pplica nts for ad miss ion shall before bein g ad mit te d to the (ba r ) exa mination,
"
AUMI&<;ION TO PRACTln :
45
I
f
Issue:
Re: Application (or Admission to t h e P h ili p pine
Bar, Vice nte D. Ching
Bar Matter No. 914, Oct. I , 19P9
113 SCAD 488
Facts:
Vicen te D. Ching, a legi tima te 80 n of a Ch inese
father a nd a Filipino mothe r wa s bom in La Un ion on
April 11, 1964 a nd ha s resided in the Philippines since
birth.
He took a nd passed the CPA Board Examination,
has shown tha t he ha s been a registered vote r of 'Iubeo,
La Union a nd ha s se rved in the said municipality 8 8 8
mem ber of the Sa nggu nia ng Bayan from 1992 up to 1995.
As a la w graduate, he applied to tak e the 1998 Bar
Examinations, a nd wa s a llowed to take the exa mina tion
s ubj ect to proof of his Philippine citizen ship.
On April 5, 1999 , the results of the Ba r examinat ions showed th at Vicen te wa s a mong the successful
examinees. The Office of t he Solicitor General now poin ts
out tha t Vicente ha s not formall y elected Philippine citi ze nsh ip a nd, if ever he does, it woul d a lready be beyond
the "reasonable ti me" a llowed by present juri sprudence.
Howeve r, du e to th e peculiar circumstances , the osa
recomm ended th e relaxation of the sta nding rule on the
const ruction of the phra se "reaso na ble period " a nd allowonce of Vicente to elect Philippine citizens hip in accord -
LEGAL PROFESSION
46
2.
3.
Is sue:
Whether or not , from the foregoing averments, petitioner may be admitted to the Ph ilippi ne bar without
having to take the Bar examina tions.
Held:
The requirements under S ection 4 , Rul e 138, a re
not met .
The pro vision read s:
AJ}l'otls.."'l!0N TO PRAL-nCE
47
LE(;AL PHOFESSI ON
48
In view of the above considerations, the Court denied th e pe tition of the applicant to the pra ct ice of law
without taking a n d passing the ba r ex amination.
Re: Application of Adriano M. Hernandez
to take t he 1993 Bar Examination
225 SeltA _ _
Facts:
Adriano Hern and ez filed a petition with the Supreme Cou rt to take the 1993 Bar Examinations a lleging
the followin g qualifications:
1.
2.
3.
4.
;\-DMISSION TO PRACTI CE
49
Issu e :
Ta n VB . Sabandal
liar Matter No. 44, Feb. 24, 1992
Facts:
Respondent passed the 1978 Bar Examinations bu t
was denied to take his oath in view of th e finding of the
Cou rt that he was gu ilty of u nautho rized pra ctice of law.
Since th en , respondent had filed n umero us pet ition s for
him to be allowed to ta ke his la wyer's oath.
Acting to his late st peti t ion in 1989, the Court directed the executive judge of the provi nce where the
res pondent is domiciled to su b mi t a comment on respond ent's moral fitness to be a member of the bar. In compli a nce th erewi th , the execu tive ju dge filed his com me n t
stat ing that al though, he is not aware of a ny acts committed by him as would di squa lify h im fr om a dmission to
the Bar. Said j udge, howe ve r, in formed the cou rt that
LEGAL PkOFESSION
50
4.
1.
2.
lI el d :
His petiti on must be denied.
Time a nd again, it ha s bee n held tha t t he practice
of law is n ot a m atter of right. It is a privilege bestowed
u pon individual s who are not on ly learned in the la w but
wh o are al so known to possess good moral character.
It should be recalled that res pondent worked as Land
In vestigat or at the Bu re au of Lands, Said em ployment
51
ADMISSI ON TC PHAt.'TICE
"
8.
resident of the province a nd of good refute for probity a nd abili ty, to a id the defend ant in his defense ;
3.
4.
5.
6.
8 11
permitted by the
1.
2.
3.
Government prosecutors;
4.
5.
6.
Ombudsm an a nd hi s deputies;
7.
6.
~1
T hose who hy s peci al law a re pro h ibited from engag ing in t he practi ce of th eir profession
BAR EXAMINAT IO NS
Chapter VI
BAR EXAMINATIONS
1.
Bar examination s is required in orde r to test one's learning and proficiency in la w, since t hese a re a mong th e requiremen ts designed to avoid social dan ger, This is dict ated by the
demands of public policy. Said examinatio ns are designed to
exclude a ny person whose intell igence , learn ing, a nd men tal
capacity are inadequate to enable hi m to a ssu me a nd d ischarge the duties of a n attorney.
55
1.
Political Law
2.
Labo r Law
3.
Civil Law
4.
5.
Taxation
Commc rciallMercantile Law
6.
An ex aminee (ca ndidate) who fa ils in the bar examinations for three times is disqualified from taking anot her examination, unless he has shown to t he sat isfaction of the
Supreme Court that he has enrolled a nd pas sed regul ar fourth
year review cla sses a s well as at tended a pre-bar review ecurse
in a recognized la w school. He must also su bmit not only a
certificat ion u nde r oath by the professors of the ind ivid ual
review s u bjects attended by him that he h as regu larly atte nded cla sses and pa ssed the subjects under the sa me conditions as a n ordinary student, bu t als o the r ating obtained by
him in the particular subject. 3
7.
8.
2.
54
Zld.
' Se e. 16. Rule 138, fU,.... Uules or Cou rt.
LEG AL PROJo'ESSIQN
BA R EXAM l NA110 NS
wea pons, camera s, tape recorders , other radio or ste reo eq uip ment. communicatio n ga dge ts or a ny oth er elect ron ic device.
Ea ting a nd smoking in sid e the exam ination a rea is likewise
prohibited .
56
3.
4.
57
BAR EXAMINATIONS
"
rity of th e examinat ions a nd to av oid u nd ue in fluen ce or pressure, the ide ntity of the examiners a re usu a lly not being divulge pending t he rel ea se of U'lP. exa mination results.
Any candid ate who viola tes a ny of the rules conce rni ng
the conduct of th e examinati ons will be ba rred from taking
the examina ti on a nd t he sa me shall be counted 8 S a failure
aga inst him. Th e Court may also, in its d iscretion, impose a
more severe pen alty like perma nent disqua lification from ta king the ba r exam ination depending u pon the circum stances of
the case.
5.
D.
E.
d)
TAXATION
a)
b)
c)
d)
Rep ublic Act No. U 25, Cre ating the Court of Tax
Appeal s
e)
MERCANTI LE LAW
b)
c)
a)
Constitutional Law
d)
P.o. No.
b)
Poli tica l La w
e)
c)
Ad ministr ative Law (usually excluding: the im plementing rules a nd regu la tions)
g)
d)
h)
Corporation Law
e)
i)
j)
k)
I)
Insolvency La w
m)
g)
C.
a)
B.
c)
5.
b)
Labor Relations
c)
Socia l Legislati on s
CIVIL LAW
a)
b)
F.
b)
c)
Probation La w
d)
so
G.
H.
6.
DAR EXAMINATIONS
LEGAl Rl WESSION
c)
Anti-Fencing Law
g)
h)
G1
REMEDIAL LAW
a)
b)
c)
d)
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
Legal Fonns
After the examinee successfully h urdl ed the ba r exa mination, he will have to take an oath before th e Supreme Court
en bane. This is the first t ime and possibly his last time to
appear before such body since not all lawye rs may have the
cha nce to a ppear again and/or a rgue before the S u preme Court
en bane for obvious roason tha t not a ll lawyers engage themselves in active la w practice and if they are, not all cases
reac h tile Supreme Court. Usually, the Court, through the
Office of the Bar Confidan t design a te s a particular date and
place in which to ad ministe r a mass oath ta king . If a successful examinee fail s to attend the mass oath taking, his remedy
is to file a petition to take his oath.
Thereafter, he will ha ve to sign in the roll of attorneys
before he ca n address himself as an attorney. lie also has to
pay his IBP membership dues and to pay his professiona l tax
1.
2.
Chapter VII
3.
4.
H is clie nts should be indigent s who have been nccepted by the lega l cli nic of the la w school;
5.
Conditions
1b ensure that the re will be no mi sca rri age of j us tice a s a resu lt of incompetence or in experien ce of
la w stude nts, who , not having 8S yet passed the
"lest of professional competence, a re p resumably u ot
fully eq uipped to act a s cou nsels on their own;
2.
3.
1b ensu re consi stency with the fundamenta l pri nciple th a t no person is a llowed to practice a pa rticula r profession withou t poescs ein g the qu a lification s,
pa rti cularly a license, a s requi red by law.
63
64
Privileged co m m u n ic a tio n
The la w stude nt is required to comply with t h e sta n da rds of profess iona l con duct gove rning members of t he bar.
F ailure of a n attorney to provide a dequate s u pervision of student pra ctice m ay be grou nd for di sciplinary action. (Circular
N o. 19, December 19, 1986).
Chapter VIII
DUTIES AND PRIVILEGES OF A LAWYER
2.
Th observe and maintain t he respect d ue to the
courts of justice and judicial officers ;
3.
Tb cou n sel a n d mai ntain s uch actio ns or p roceed .
in gs only as a p pear to h im to be j us t, a n d s uch defen ses on ly
as he believes to be hon estly deb atable u nder t he la w;
66
Chapter I
..
"
sa
I.EI1 AL P(WFE.c;.<;ION
Rule 6.03 - A la wyer shall not . after lea vi ng governmen! service, accept engageme n t or employment in connection with a ny matter in whi ch he h ad interven ed while in th e
said service.
C h a p ter II
THE LAWYER AND THE LEGAL PROFESSION
CANON 7 - A LAWYER SHALL AT ALL TIME S UP HOLD THE INT EGRITY AND DIGNITY OF THE LEGAL
PROFESSION AN D SUPPORT THE ACTIVITIES OF T HE
INT EGRAT ED BAR .
Rule 7.01 - A la wyer sha ll be a ns werable for kn owing ly
making fal se stateme nt or su ppressing a materi al fact, in connection with his a pplication for a dmiesio u to th e bar.
69
Ru le 9.0 1 - A la wye r sh al l not delega te to a ny u nq uali fied person the perfonnan ce of any task which by law may
only be pe rforme d by a me mber of the Ba r in good stand ing .
Rule 9.02 - A la wyer s ha ll not divide or stipulate to
divi de a fee for lega l se rvices with a person not licensed to
practice la w, except:
a)
b)
c)
Where a la wyer or la w firm includes non -lawy er- employees in a retirement plan , even if th e plan is based
in whole or in pa rt, on a profit-sharing arra ngement.
C hap ter III
,I
70
Rule 10.03 - A lawyer shall observe the rules of procedure a nd sha ll not misuse the m to defea t t he ends of justice.
CANON 11 - A LAWYER S HALL OBS ERVE AND
MAINTAIN THE RESPECT DUE TO THE COURTS AND TO
JUDICIALOFFICERS AND SHOULD NOT INSIST ON SIMI
LAR CONDUCT BY OTHEllS.
Rule 11.01 attired.
U :O AL I'ROFES.<;ION
71
on formal ma tters, such as the mailing, au t he nt.ica tion or cus tody of a n instrument, and the like ; or
on substantial matters, in cases where his testimony is ess ential to the ends of justic e, in wh ich
event he mu st, during hi s testimony, entrust the
trial of the case to an other cou ns el.
-a
Chapter IV
or
A 1..I\WYER
73
Rule 15.05 - A la wyer, when ad vis ing his clie nt, shall
give R ca ndid a nd honest opinion on t he merits a nd probable
res u lts of the clien t's case, neit her oversta ting nor understating the prospects of t he case.
Rule 14.02 - A lawyer shall not decline, except for serious a nd sullicient ca us e , a n a ppointment 8 S counsel de officio
or 8 S a mi cus curiae , or a request from the In tegrated Bar of
th e Philippin es or a ny of its chapters for the rendition of free
legal a id.
0 (\1
a)
he is not in a position to carry out the work effecti vely or com peten tl y;
b)
~,
I
'i
"
LEGAL PROFESSION
"
The t ime spent and the ext ent of the services rendered or requi red;
h)
c)
d)
e)
g)
h)
i)
j)
"
b)
when required by la w;
c)
when necessary to collect his fees or to defend him se lf, his e mployees or associates or by j udicia l acti on.
e)
b)
Whe n the client insists that t he lawyer pu rs ue conduct violative of t hese canons and rules;
c)
d)
When t he mental or phys ica l cond it ion of the la wye r rende rs it difficult for him to carry out t he
employment e ffectively;
e)
h)
Ot he r s imilar cases.
2.
77
a)
b)
c)
d)
an d
Mem be rship in the bar entai ls various obliga tions. The
la wyer's role in the ad ministration of j us tice deman ds obligat ions whic h a re not usu ally expected from a n ord inary lay-
78
:1
Once 8 p<lrson is gi ve n th e pri vilege or Irnnchi sc to pract ice la w, he ip so {acto becomes a n adminis trato r of justice ,
oath boun d serv a nt of society whose firs t d uty is not to his
client but towards the ad min istr ation of jus tice.
79
Phil. 26..e.
a17 Apri l 1990 .
~9
80
cule, degrade and even de stroy the courts and thei r me mbers.
In In re La ureto." a la wye r was held in contempt and
s us pende d from the practice of la w for wri ting ind ividual le t ters to t he members of t he SC division who decided a cas e
8'
of ho norable, candid and courteous deal ings with fellow la wyers as well as the establishe d customs and practices of the
profession an d perfo rmance of the d uties to the in tegrated
bar. The Code of Profession al Respo nsibility provides a mong
others that a lawyer shall not , direc tly or indirectly encroach
upon the professional employment of another lawyer. A la wyer should not steal t he othe r lawyer's client nor induce the
latter to retain him by a prom ise of better se rvice, good. result
or reduced fees for hi s services. However, as se rvant of the
law, he has the du ty to giv e proper advice a nd assistance to
those seeking relief aga inst un fa it hful and neglectful counsel.
This is not to say, howeve r, that a lawyer may not substitute
a not he r la wyer in h andling t he ca se of a client, bu t h e may
only do so u pon proper notice to the counsel concern ed a nd
only after the latter h ad tendered his withd rawal to the case,
as a role.
82
83
;1
Th e relat ionship be tween an attorney and client is consider ed as pe rson al , fidu cia ry a nd con fide ntial. By virt ue
the reof, a lawyer owes fidelity to the CU U8C of his client and
he sha ll be mindful of the trust a nd confide nce reposed in
him .
A la wyer in the disch arge of his professi onal d uties is , in
a res tricted sense , an agent of his client. He is ex pected to be
vi gilan t in the prosecution or defen se of his client's ri ghts. As
the relation ship is characterized as h ighl y fiduciary, it ha s
been held in a lon g line of cases that an a ttorney owes loyalty
to his client not only in the case in wh ich he has represente d
him bu t a lso a fte r the term ination of the at to rney-clien t rel a tionship between them a nd it is not a good practice to perm it
him afterw ards to defend in another case other persons against
his form er clie nt under the prete xt that the case is distinct
from , a nd inde pe ndent of the fanner ca se. An a ttorney owes
to his clien t a n undivided a llegiance a nd after he has bee n
retained by a nd received the confide nce of his clie nt, he cannot . without the free and in tell igent consent of his client, give n
after full k nowledge of a ll the facts a nd circumstances, act
both for hi s client a nd for one wh ose interest is a dve rse to or
conflicting with tha t of his client in the flame genera l ma tter.
The rul e is designed not only to prevent the d isho nes t practiti oner from fraudulent conduct but a lso to preclude the hon est pra ctitioner from pu tting himself in a position where he
may be required to choose between conflicting du ties. Jt is
likewise a duty of a n a ttorney to d isclose to the clien t all the
.
!
LEGAL PROFF.5.SIO N
5.
li e h a s the ri~ht to protes t, in a respect ful manner,
any unwarranted treatme nt of a wit ness or a ny unjusti fied
delay in th e administration of justice : a nd
6.
P a ssi ng t he ba r is equiva le nt to a first grade civil
se rvice ellgt biltty for a ny position in t he cla ss ified service i n
the governme nt t he du ti es of which require knowledge of law,
or 8 second grade civil serv ice eligibility for a ny other government positi on .
P rivilege s or a n attorney
In ge neral, an a ttorney e njo ys t he following privileges:
1.
He h as hoth t h e right a nd privi lege to pr actice law
du ri ng good behavior before eny judicial, quasi-judicial or
adminis trative tribunal ;
2.
He enj oys the presumption of regularity in the d ischarge of hi s fun ctions;
3.
He e njoys immunity fro m liabilit y to t h ird (3rd)
pe rson, in the pe rfonnance of hi s obligati on to hill clie nt, insofar 88 he does not mate riall y depa rt from hi s ch a ra cter a s
a qua si -judicial officer;
4.
Hi s statements, if relevant, pertinent or material to
the s u bject of judicial inquiry are absolutel y privileged :
H5
86
Iss ue s
87
FENTICOSTES V S. lUA.1\'EZ
Adm. Case CnD No. 167, 9 March 1999
104 S CAD 236, 304 S CRA 281
Facts:
Res pondent W8S rem oved from the H.oll ofAttorn eys
for unethical , unscrupulous a nd unconscionable conduct
toward the complainant for the following rea sons:
1.
He is guilty of violating Ru le 1.0 1 of Ca non 1
of the Code of Professiona l Responsi bility because he deceived the com pla inant for material ga in.
Deception and ot her fraudulent acts by a law yer
are d isgraceful end d ishonor abl e. They reveal moral flaws
in a lawyer. They a re un accep ta ble.
The relati on ship of a la wyer shou ld be characterized by the highest degree of good faith. fa irness and
candor. This is the esse nce of th e lawyer 's oath. The
la wyer 's oath is no t a mere fictile of word s, drift and
hall ow, bu t a sac red b ust tha t lawyers must uph old a nd
keep invio labl e. The nature of the offi ce of a n a ttorney
requires tha t he must be a person of good moral cha racter. Th e requisite is not. onl y a condit ion preced ent to the
ad mission to the pra ctice of la w, its conti n ue d possession
is also essential for rema ining in the practi ce of law.
Issue:
Whether or not responde nt is gu ilty of misconduct
a nd have violated Canon 16 of t he Code of Professiona l
Responsibility.
Held:
It is glaringly clear that re spondent's non -rem ittance for over o ne year of the fu nds coming from
En carnacion is gross viola tion of Rule 1.01 of the Code of
Profess ional Respons ibility. The belated payment does
not excuse his miscond uct. Neither would his defense
th at the acts complained of were not done by him in his
capacity as a pra cti cing la wyer but on account of his
office as a prosecu tor exculpate h im from res ponsibility.
While Encarnacion may not strictly be consi dered a elient of responden t, the rul es relating to a lawye r's handling of funds of a client is applicable.
The Court note d the ada ma nt refusa l of the respondent. to comply with the orders of the lUP and his total
dis rega rd of t he s ummo ns issued by the lOP a s constitutive of contemptuous acts reflect ive of unprofessional conduct.
2.
Th e practice of la w is not a right but II pri vilege
bestowed by the State on th ose who show that they possess a nd contin ue to possess the qu alifica ti ons requ ired
by la w for the conferme nt of such pri vilege . Membership
in the Bar is a privilege burdened with conditions.
AA
88
has violated his duty under th e Rules of Court, to coun sel a nd maintain such actions or proc eedings only as
a ppea r to him to be just a nd such defenses only 8S he
believes to be honestly deba table unde r th e law.
Want of moral integrity is to be more severely condemned in II lawyer who holds a responsible public of-
fice.
The respondent wa s reprimanded with stem warnin g.
AFURONG V8. AQUINO
A.C. No. 1571, 23 September 1999
112 SCAD 838, 315 SCRA 77
Facts:
Afuron g filed II complaint for ejectmen t against
Victorino Flores whi ch was decided in her favor, and the
corresponding writ of execution was served on Victorino.
Victorino sought the a ssistance of th e Cit izens Legal ABsistance Office (C LAO) a n d th e ca se was assign ed to Atty.
Aquino, who was then connected with th e sa id office.
n eld:
Respond ent should not ha ve filed the petition for
certiorari cons ide ri ng that it has no a ppa re nt purpose
othe r th an to del ay th e execu tion of a valid judgment. He
Facts:
LEG" L I'KOHSSIO N
90
Is sue :
Should respondent be s ubjected to disci pline despi te
the fact that obtaining her loan was her conduct in a
non-professional ca pacity?
dish on esty in his profession, but 81:-:;0 for gross misconduct not connected with his professi onal duties, wh ich
s hows him to be unfit for the office a nd u nworthy of the
privi lege whi ch h is license and the law confe r upon him.
Worthy to note, however, is that fa il ure to pay one 's debt
may not involve such a grievous now on morals as in the
case at bar.
VI LL.AF LOR
H eld :
91
V B.
S ARITA
Fac ts.
Re spondent lawyer was able to obtain a favorable
judgm ent in the MTC which wa s later affirmed by the
RTC. The defendant in th at cas e a ppe aled to the CA a nd
was a ble to obtain a Temporary Res t raining Order (TRO)
a dd ressed to a nd served upon the presiding j udge of the
RTC, the she ri ff and counsel for bo t h parties, enjoining
the e viction and demolition of defendant's family home.
Respondent then filed an ex parte motion with the
MTC for the im pleme ntation a nd/or enforcement of the
writ of dem olition pre viously issued without a dvis ing the
tria l court of the TRO issued by the CA.
Issue :
Hel d :
Res ponde nt is guilty of unethical cond uct.
His d isregard of the TRO is a n immea surab le dis service to the judicial syste m. By s uch act, he deliberAt-el y disregarded or ignored his sole mn oat h to conduct
himse lf as a lawyer according to the bes t of his knc wledge a nd discretion , with all good fidelity to the courts.
He ne g lected his duties to observe a nd maintain the
res pect du e to the courts of j us tice and judicial officers,
D UTl F~"
LEGAL PROJo'ESSION
92
Facts:
Atty. Gojar, the cou nsel of t.he former e mployees of
Uniwide Sales, In c., wa s char ged with lack of fidelity to
his clients' cause on the a llega tion that: The employees
filed a petition for review on certiorari before the Saprem e Court a nd Atty. Gojar (he rein respo ndent) moved
for the d ism issa l of the petition witho ut. the ir consent;
Atty. Gojar appeal ed from the d ismissal of a n unfair la bor
pra ctice beyond the In-day period to do so; He promised
to file a peti tion before the S u preme Court after a n a ppe a l in t he NLRC for money cla ims waR dismissed , bu t
sa
' 8.
llILDAWA
SALONGA
A.C . No. 5 105, 12 August 1999
llO SCAD 663, 3 12 SC RA 279
Facts:
The Preside nt of SfAVA charged Atty. lI ilda wa of
ha ving withdrawn a deposit in favo r of SfAVA in the
.,
LEGAL PROfF..8..<;ION
.,
Issu e:
Wa s t he wit hdrawal of cou nsel in confonnity wit h
t he rul es?
Facts:
Atty. Boncavil wa s charge by herein comp lai nants
with violation of the Code of P rofession al Responsibility
relative to two cadast ral ca ses h e filed for one of the
com pla in a nts, Tiburcio. Th e complaina nts a nd the res ponde n t live in close pro xim it y with each ot he r.
Respondent allege d that the day before t he ca daet ral court rendered its decision, he me t by chance, Julian ,
H eld:
LEGAl.
oc nra
PRor~ ION
IIARRIENTOS V8 . DAAROL
Ad m. Case 151 2, January 29, 1993
97
Issue:
Whether the respondent resorted to a cts of decei t
and immoral te ndencies to sa t isfy hi s se xual desires a nd
whethe r this would warrant h is di sbarment.
Held :
Fa cts:
Compl ainant Victoria Ba rri entos filed a com plai n t
for di sbarment against Atty. Daarol on grounds of deceit
a nd grossly immora l cond uct .
Barrientos is single a nd wa s twe nty years old when
Facts:
Prior to th e ad minis tra tive case filed against responden t -Iudgc Ca lderon, com plai na nt Atty. Bela oing was se-
.8
u:GAI. PROFESSION
or A LAI'tYE R
'"
Issue :
Whether Atty. Balaoing violated Cano n II afthe Code
of Professional Responsibili ty t hat a lawyer shall observe
and maintain the respect due to t he court an d to t he judicia l officer a nd sho uld in sist on similar cond uct by ot hers.
Held:
The Court fin ds t hat t he complainant Balaoing ha s
a pench a nt for filing admin is t ra tive charges agai nst
judges in wh ose sala h e has pending cases , whenever the
lat ter rende r decis ion or issue orders a dverse to him or
to h is clients. While it is true that la wyers owe enti re
de votio n to the interest of the client , warm zeal in t he
mainte n ance and de fen se of h is rights a nd the exertion
of h is utmost learning and a bility. No fear of judicial
disfavor or pu blic unpop ula ri t y should restra in h im from
the full disch arge of hi s du ty.
Ba laoin g's wanton disregard of t he stem warning
not to again lite ba seless a nd frivo lous complai nts wh ich
only clog t he a lrea dy full dockets of the Cou rt in stead of
serve t he ends of justice, a nd his adamant re fusa l to
a bide t he Code of Professional Responsi bility wh ich se rves
to regulate a la wyer 's cond uct in thi s jurisdiction, h a ve
Fuets:
Co m p lainan ts Drs . Albert o F ernandez , Isab el o
C ngt.engco and Achilles Bartolome and the St. Luk e's
Medi cal Center, filed a dis barment procee d ing 81ainst
responde n t Atty. Grecia for d ishonesty and grave mi scon d uct in connection with t he th eft of some pages from
a medical chart wh ich was m a te rial evidence in a dam.
age s ui t filed by hi s clien ts agai n st the com plainants.
Disb arment is noth in g new to the respondent. He
was al ready d isbarred for h is im mo ral comp licit y or
u n ho ly alliance with a judge in Que zon City to ri p oIT
banks a n d Ch inese bus iness finns which had t he misfort u ne to be s ued in t h e latter 's cou rt. T hree years later,
the cou rt, heeding hi s pleas for com passion and his promise to mend h is ways , rein s tated h im in the profession .
Eight mo n ths late r, he was back before t he court facin g
a nother charge of dishonest y and unethica l practice .
Re s pondent acts a s counsel for Ally. Damaeo Aves,
et al. case vs. St. Luke's Med ical Center 's Drs. Fernandez ,
Ongtengco a nd Bartolome , blaming the latte r for th e
demise of Atty. Aves' wife , who was d iagnosed, treated
a n d died in t he said hospital. In the court proceedings
against St. Luke's Medical Center, the me d ica l records of
t he wife were submitted by St. Luke's . It is from thes e
records t h at t he res pon den t t ried to cove r some medical
facts by tearing two impo rtant pa ges from th e wife's
medica l chart.
Is s u e :
Did responden t's action consti tute a violation of th e
ca n ons of t he profession?
100
Held :
The court is convi nced t ha t in stealing pag es and passing it on to his driver, responde n t ha s viola ted Rule 1.01,
Canon 1 of'the Rules of'Profeesional Reeponsibll ity 8 8 well
as Ca non 7, which provides that "A lawyer she ll at all
times uphold th e in tegrity a nd di gnity of lega l profession
and su pport the activitie s of the Inte gr a te d Bar."
By descend in g to the le vel of a common thief, responde nt Grecia has dem ean ed an d disgraced th e lega l
profession. He ha s demon strated his moral un fitness to
continue a s a member of the honorable fraternity of lawyers. He ha s forfeited hi s me m bersh ip in the BaT.
The court fin ds Atty. Benjam in Grecia guilty of grave
miscond uct . dish onesty, a nd grossly unethical behavior
as a lawyer. Conside ri ng t hat this is a lready his second
offense a gainst the canons of the profession, th e court
impo se the supre me pena lty of disbar men t.
Chapter IX
THE INTEGRATED BAR OF THE PHILIPPINES
1.
Co n c e p t
102
2)
3)
4)
5)
Provide a foru m fer the d iscussion of Jaw, jurisprudence, law reform , plead ing, pract ice a nd procedure ,
and the relations of the Dar to the Bench and to the
public, a nd publish information rela tin g thereto;
6)
7)
8)
Enable the Bar to disch arge its pub lic res ponsibility effectively.
7)
8)
9)
10)
11 )
12)
13)
14 )
2)
3)
4)
S hield the judiciary, which trad it ionally can not defend itse lf exce pt within its own foru m, from the
assaults that politics and self-interest may level at
it, a nd assist it to maintain its integrity, impa rtiality and indepen den ce;
,
5)
6)
3.
103
or the
Bar, p. 27.
."
10'
LEGAL PROFESSION
rest ricts the Cou rt's inh erent power, but is a mere legislative
decla ration tha t the integration of the bar will promote public
interest or, more s pecifically, will r aise th e standard s of the
legal profes sion, im prove th e adminis tra tion of j ust ice. and
ena ble th e Bar to discha rge its public respons ibility more effe cti vely.
4.
Freedom of Association
Regulatory Fee
For th e Court to prescribe du es to be paid by the mem bers does not mean th a t t he Court levies a tax.
A membership fee in the Integrated Bar is an exaction
for regulation, while t he pu rpose of a tax is reve nu e. If t he
LEGAL
106
PRO FF~<;.gl aN
c.
Freedom o f S peech
107
new regula tion, it will give the members of the Bnr a new
syste m which they hitherto have not had and through wh ich,
by p roper work , they will receive benefit s Ih...y have not heretofo re e njoyed, and discha rge t he ir public responsibiliti es in a
m ore e ffect ive manner than they hav e been ab le to do i n the
pa st . Beca use the requirement to pay du e s is a va lid exercise
or a regulatory power by the Court, because it will ap ply equally
to a ll la wyers, young a nd old , at the time Ba r integratio n
take s effect, and becau se it is a new regulation in exchange
for new benefits , it is not retroactive , it is not unequal, it is
not unfair.
5.
6.
Organization
I,
108
LEG.U PROFESSIOK
It must be noted that the Supreme Court has the administrative supervision over the In tegrated Bar of the Philippines including its officers from the Pre sident, the Boa rd of
Governo rs, etc.3
'"
Chapter X
DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS
'Vi llaruel, ~t 01. f t . Atty. J oae G ra pilon and the IBP Board or Governors, AC No. 4826, 27 Jan. 1999 .
109
T.EGAL PROFERSION
110
2)
Th rem ove from the profession a person wh ose mi sconduct has proved him unfit to be entruste d with
the duties and re sponsibilities belongin g to the office of nn at to rn ey.
Deceit;
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
HI
Following the prin ciples of fair play, a ny r es pondent-lawyer is gi ven a fair chance to defen d hi mself from accusatio ns.
Not all accusations are true. So it is likewise mandated that,
no atto rn ey shall be re moved or sus pe nded from the practi ce
of his profession , unt il he has ha d full opport uni ty upon r easonable notice to a nswe r the cha rges a gains t him, to prod uce
witnes ses in his own beh al f, a nd to be hea rd by h imself or
counsel. But if upon re a sonabl e notice he fai ls to appea r and
a nswer the a ccusation , t he court may proceed to determine
the ma tter ex pa rte,7
The notice to a n a ttorn ey to appea r a nd sho w cause why
he should not be punis he d for contem pt, can not be con sidered
a s a notice to show cause why he sh ould not be suspend ed
from practice. A lawye r has the right, after d ue notice, to be
heard. a nd defend himself in suspensi on proc eedings .tl
"In
112
LEGAL PROFESSION
Chapter XI
CHOICES OF A NEW LAWYER
b)
J oining a la w fi nn as an associate/assistant;
c)
d)
e)
a)
11'
LE GAL PROFKSSIQN
me et the high cost of necessary expe nses like re ntals, su pplies, eq uipments, a nd other overhead expe nses.
Adva n ta ges 1)
2)
3)
Ind epend ence of acti on - A n ew lawyer ca n a ct in depen dently a s he e njoys the privilege of being his
own boss a nd is not accountable to a nyone except
himself a nd hi s client. There is no one t o restrain
him from adopting a certain course of action, which
he believes is appropriate under the circum stances .
b)
~)
3)
2)
3)
Fin ally, as he never runs ou t of cases, he is constantly exposed to actua l court practice, opportu ni ties of facing reputable la wyers and learning from
th e m, so much so that within a short lime he a cqu ires the t raits of a seasone d la wyer. Thi s is particul arly tru e in small to medium size d law firms .
Disadv antages 1)
U5
Disad vantages I)
An associate is red uced to t he s ta tu s of mere e mployee susceptible of bei ng exploited by more se nior
lawyers .
"'
2)
5)
c)
It is not advisab le for a young lawyer to put a law partnership although this may offer better opportunities. This is
usually done by classmates or by friends- lawyers who are welloff or financially ca pable to mai ntain a law office.
d)
Joining a corporate la w department offers more pecuniary benefit than other options. Aside from an offer of a highe r
salary, corporations like wise give generous benefits or other
compensation packages not usually given by private low firms.
Th is may sometimes create a dilemma for a la wyer to lea ve a
corporate job and go into a private Ia..... practice for fear of
losing higher-paying jobs .
There are oth er companies .....ho allow their la wyers to
engage in priv ate practice during off-hours whil e others do
not. The de mands of their jobs and lack of clientele, howev er,
may discourage th em to e ngage in private practice eve n if
permitted.
e)
111
Government e mploymen t
GETI'ING
STAHT}O~O
119
pri ce before. They a re the products of va st exp eri e nce, sac rifice, ha rd work. persevera nce, pati en ce a nd de dication.
Chapter XII
GETTING STARTED
leo
i!~
I.EGAL PROFESSION
120
Time Management
By pla nning ahead a nd managing his time, a la wyer ca n avoid stress. Avoid meeting deadlines a nd s chedul e your activities one a t 8 time by knowing your priori ties a nd alternative courses of action.
b)
Stay Healthy
It ha s bee n proven that laughter is the best medicine . Therefore, ha ving a good se nse of humor, an d tak-
12 1
Im prove
one:~
122
I.EGAI, PROn;SSION
GETTING f'TARTED
ices. Aside from this, it will also provide him a n outlet to stay
awa y momentarily from his legal work and to engage in other
worthwhil e activities.
2.
Preventive Lawyeri ng
~ Bl ack'B
123
b)
c)
reconsiderations ;
d)
compromise;
e)
a dvice to clien ts :
Us ually, cases or disputes may be settled s peed ily without resorting to court litigation resulting to a ' w in-wi n" situation for the conten ding parties . By enc ouragi ng a settlem ent
of a dispute withou t reso rt ing to litigation , a la wyer is performing his duty as an officer of the court in facilitat ing t he
s peedy a dministra tion of j us tice by unclogging the dockets of
the cou rts. Negotiation/conciliation als o help s the parties to
avoid the tro u ble, expe nse a nd anxiety of a public trial.
In man y insta nces , it is not only beneficial for a cl ient to
set tl e hi s cause or claim s rather tha n litigate, it is a lso
favorable to a lawyer wh o wants to sa ve time and effort, a s it
may happen that the total claim bein g mad e is less tha n what
it would cost to defend. Incidentally for a new lawyer who
lacks a deq uate experience in court liti gation, se t tleme nt is a n
effect ive mean s to settle cont rove rsies. By successfully resorting in to this tool, he will not lose h is fees an d his cl ien ts.
Settlement, is a major part of a la wyer 's e normous task
in the proper ad minist ration of j ust ice and this should be
e ncouraged by every lawyer before resorting to lit igation which
is time -consuming and e xpensi ve. Litigat ion may even deprive
a la wye r more pro fitabl e office pract ices.
12.
'II
Lf';GAL !'!toFESSION
Chapter XIII
AR TICLES ON THE LEGAL PROFESSION
[The following articles nre presented fur aca demic di scussion only. Full cre dit shoul d be gi ven to the respective
authors of the e rticles.l
Focus o n the Legal Profession "
By
Justice Vicen te V. Mendoza "
"6
127
LF.GAL PROFES.<;ION
tion fever. Once when she W A S hein g made to drink her mil k,
she remonstrated: "Objection, you r honor, but I have a lrea dy
done so!" And so when the trial wa s abruptly sto pped, many
missed the coverage a nd often re minisced severa l mem orabl e
scenes.
ad opte d the Manda tory Continui ng Lega l Edu cation for members of the IBP. Un der the program , IBP mem bers a re reo
qu tred to und ergo every three (3 ) years a t lea st t!-:.irty-six (36)
hours of legal ed ucation as follows: six (6) ho urs in legal et h ics, fou r (4) ho urs in t rial a nd pre-trial s kills, five (5 ) hou rs in
alternative di spute resolution, nine (9) hour s ill recent dcvelopm enta in s u bstantive and procedural la ws, four (4) in legal
writing a nd oral advocacy, n n d t wo (2 ) hours in inte rn ational
la w and inte rna tional conve nt ions. The bala nce of s ix (6) hours
will be devoted to such subjects as may be p re scribed by the
MCLE Comm ittee.
128
Not on ly must lega l services be availa ble wall. Lega l services must be ma de availa ble at the ea rliest possible time, a nd
not when a case is a lready in court. Fo r j ust as the re is a need
for preven tive medi cine, t he re is also a ne ed for prevent ive le ga l cou nseling so that parties will be saved th e tro uble, the expense, and th e anxiety of litiga ti on. S uc h services can ra nge
from the draft ing of cont racts to the making ofwi Us.
129
Th e MCLE progra m is administe red by a comm ittee composed of a ret ired j ust ice of the Su pre me Court, as cha irperson,
and four (4) members, one nomin ated by the lBP, a second member no min ated by the Philippine J udicial Aca demy, a t hi rd one
nom ina ted by a law cente r, a nd the fourth nom ina ted by an
a ssociation of law schools and/or law professors.
Lega l education acti vit ies will be held either by providers a pproved or certified by the MCLE or by t hose required by
la w to give contin uing lega l ed ucation.
Those who fail to comply with the MCL E withou t sa ti sfactory expla nat ion will be required to pay a "non-com plia nce
fcc" a nd cons ide red deli nqu ent membe rs of t he ba r, wh o will
be su bject to d isci plina ry action by t he board of governors of
the IBP and by th e Su preme Court.
Exemption from the requirement to lake the MCLE is
provi ded for certain ind ivid ua ls, such as the Preside nt and
Vice-Presid ent of the Ph ilippines, members of Congre ss end
mem be rs of the j ud iciary by re ason of th eir positions in the
govern ment a nd qu a si-public institutions. After they ceas e to
hold office by virt ue of whi ch they were exe mpted from th e
MCLE , these members will, like any ot her member of the JBP,
be required to comply with the MCLE.
On the othe r han d, exemption from t he requ iremen t to
lake the MCLE may be obta ine d by certa in individu al s, s uch
as those who are not in la w pra ctice or those who hav e retired
from law pra ct ice. In a ddi ti on, pa rti al credits m ay be ea rned
for certai n a ct ivities s uch as a ttendn nce in se minars , confe-
tH
l:,LEGAL PROFESSION
rences and t he like , acting 8 S lect ure r, resource person, cornmunicator, etc. , or wri ting books, a nd teac hi ng.
130
13 1
By
"You may chain my hands, you may sha ckle my
feet, you may eve n throw me into a da rk prison; but
you sha ll not enslave my th inking because it is free."
Kahlil Gibran
Lawyers, as a class , embody th e noblest ideals of courage , j ustice, a nd public service. They are always at th e fore front in time s of nationa l crisis . By rea son of th eir profession ,
which is a ll-embracing t he affa irs of men , the people look up
to them especially in times of great political a nd constitutional crises , Fear lessly, t hese noble men would sacrifice their
lives and fortunes for t he ca use of freedom a nd publi c duty.
Ma ny a country's constitu tion was fr a med by its national
lea ders, most of them la wye rs . The figh t for independence in
severa l instances has a lways been re lentlessly pur sued by
la wyer-leaders .
The 1935 Phi lippine Constitution wa s framed by our country's best legal minds; t he Declara tion of Independence of t he
United States of Ame rica was written by 8 great lawyer who
became one of its greatest P residents ; and India's long fight for
independe nce thro ugh non-violence was incessantly, tenaciously
and successfu lly pursued by its greatest leader who beca me
martyr in the cause offreedom a nd publi c service.
Mahatma Gandhi, President Abra ha m Lincoln, President
Thomas Jefferson, and our own Presid en t Manuel L. Quezon
"Pu blis hed in lhe Lawy er ', Review, Vol. IX, 30 Nov. 1995.
"Pa rt ne r; La ure l Law Offire ,,; LL.B.'56. Fra ncisco Law School (CIW18
Valedictorian and MrJj(na Cum Laudt ); Asst. Atto m ",y "ra ncisco Law a ffire"
11957- 19651,
'(
132
M ahutma Gan d h i
1 ~1
134
IS-GAL
f'kOfoE...
~ION
years old that IND EPE ND ENCE FOR INDIA came , soone r
than he expected a lthough he had sai d that he wou ld achieve
it in his lifetime. The fr ee dom of h is cou ntry a nd people for
wh om he had fought so long and so well was crowning glory
of his life.
On J anuary 13 , 19 48 , Gandhi , at the age of 78, began a
fast for the purpose of ending bloodshed among Hi nd u, Moslem and other groups . Five days later, the facti ous leaders
pledge to cease fighting. Ten days alte r on his way to a prayer
service open to followe rs of any re ligion, Mahatma Gandhi
wa s gunned down by a high-ranking Indian Brahman who
feared Gandhi's tolera nt teach ing and programs .
Thus ended the life of Ma hatma Gandhi, frail and slight
in built but poeeeseod of limitless ph ysical st re ngth a nd th e
greatest moral courage and conviction.
Mahatma Gandhi's e a rthly possessions consi sted of a pai r
of eyeglasses , loin cloth, a pa ir of sa ndals and ne edle a nd
t hread. His simple a nd hon est life puts to shame other leaders, who ca llous ly a mass we a lth in publ ic office , plu nd er their
nations' wea lth and impoverish thei r own peo ple without the
slightest tw inge of cons cience, unabashe d by the condem nation of their own people a nd by the verdict of history.
ARTICLfo~
ox TIlE
LEGAL PROFESSION
'36
1:16
LEGAL PI(OFESSI ON
them. Lincoln received h is licen se to practice law on September 9 , 1836 a nd his nam e wa s entered on the roll of attorneys
on March I , 1837. l'.t that time. there were few law schools
a nd most lawyers si mply "read la w" in the office of a n a ttorney.
Lincoln's method of study is rev eal ed in the followin g
classic a dvice he gave to a la w student :
A HTI C LE~
1:17
138
139
140
U;GAI. I'RQFF.ssION
t he establis hme nt of t he Universi ty of Virginia whose cam puses lind buil d ings a t Cha rlott esville he designe d him self
Th e Uni ve rsity of virginia wa s founded "based on the illimi t a ble freedom of the h uman mind to ex plore a nd to expose
e ve ry s ubject s usce pt ible of its contemplation."
Du ri ng P res ide n t J efferson's term, one of t he most important Su preme Co u rt decisi ons in Ame ri can h istory was t he
ce lebrated case of Marbury v. Madison in 1803 . Pre siden t
Ada ms had a ppointed William Ma rb ury 85 one of the 42 just ices of t he pe ace a p pointed to five-year t erms in the District
of Co lu mbia . Ma r bu ry a pplied to t he S up reme Court for a
writ of ma nda m us, orderi ng Secre tary of Sta te J am es Madis on to deli ve r h is commiss ion. The S upreme Court refused to
force Madi son to deliver Marbu ry's commission. decla rin g tha t
the Judicia ry Act of 171:1 9 wa s unconstit ution al.
It wa s also du ri ng the two te rms of President J efferson
that the Uni ted States dou bled in area with t he purch ase of
the vast Lousi sla ne 'Terri tory from Napo leon for $16 mill ion
- a real estate bargain a t 3 cents a n acre . The Louis iana
Purch ase ranks 8 S one of .Jeffers on's greatest ach ievem ents .
In the twilight of his life. Thom a s J efferson design a ted
the marker for his own grave a nd wrote the followin g epitaph:
Th e following inscr iption a nd not a word more:
'Here wa s bu ried Th oma s J efferson , Author of the
Decla ration of Inde pen den ce, of the Statute of Virginia for reli gious freedom , and the Father of the
Univers ity ofVi n.rinia. Because by t hese. a s te stimonial s that I have lived, I wish most to be remembered ."
J efferson ex pla ined t ha t t hese t hree were things he had
given to the people, wh ile a ll the ot hers , from mem bership of
the Virgi ni n H ou s e of Il ur gesses to the presidency. were thi ngs
the people had ",r iwn h im .1b quote t he political thought of th..
greates t Lebanese poet -write r-phi losopher Kahlil Gibra n which
was paraphras ed by Pre sid ent .lo bn F. Kenedy in his In au gu r al Add ress , "Ask not wha t yuu r country can do for you but
wha t you ca n d o for yuur country"
I<I
On J uly 4. 1826. 50 year s after th e a dopt ion of the Decla ra t ion of Independen ce. J effers on died .
Presi de nt Thom as Jefferson is regarded as one of the
five greatest American Pre sidents. His greatest monume nt in
Am eri can hi story is hi s Decla rat ion of Ind ependen ce which
ha s contin uously ins pired nati ons the worl d over in their glori ous qu est for freed om, justice. liberty a nd democra cy.
President Manuel L. Quezon
President Man uel L . Quezon , the champion of Philippin e
In depe nde nce a nd the first President of the Philippine Commonw ealth, is one of the greatest Filipinos who steadfastly
fought for his country's freedom. He had complete fa it h in the
cap acity of the Filipino people to govern them selves .
After groduating Summa Cum Laude with th e Degree of
Bachelor of Arts from San Juan de Letra n in 1895, Que zon
studied law a t Sto. Tomas from 1896-1899 , a nd in 1903 wa s
admitted to the bar.
It. is notew orthy that the case of U.S. us. Berry wh ich he
prosecuted when he was Provincial Fiscal of Tayabas was the
firs t cri mina l case during the early pe riod of the Ame rican
regime when a Filipino Fiscal dared to file a cri mina l complaint agai nst an American. wh o was al so a lawyer, a nd the
firs t ti me that a Filipino secured the con viction of an Ameri can in a court presided over by an America n j udge.
Qu ezon beca me interested in politics , a nd in 1905 w e e
elected Governor of Tayabaa (now Quezon) a nd t hen to the
First Phili ppine Asse mbly in 1907. He wa s chosen Delegate to
the In terna tional Congress of Navigation in S1. Petersbu rg,
Rus si a in 1908 and from 1909-1916 , was Re sident Commissioner to the United S ta tes. He beca me the President of Ole
Se na te from 1916 to 1934.
l.F.G AL PROFESSI ON
On the histo ric date Nove mber 15, 1935 , Quezon assumed
t he Presid ency of the Phili ppi ne Com monwealth lending to
inde pendent nationhood wh ile Sergio Osm ena assu me d the
Vice-P re sid ency, unt il 1944.
142
As a lead er of the nation, P resident Quezon fu lly recognized the separa tion of ch u rch an d state 8S ens h ri ne d in the
19 35 Constitu tion a nd , t he re fore, "no a utho rity of a ny chu rch
has a ny rig ht to interfere with the affairs of the Governm ent."
President Quezon 's obsession was to secu re Phili ppi ne
Independence. After the Ha re-Hawes Cu tti ng Act was rejecte d
by an overwhelming maj ority in the Philippin e Legislature,
Quezon W8 S se nt by the Philippine Legislature to Washingto n
to expla in to the Am erican Congress and to Presiden t Franklin
Roosevelt the re a son for reject ing the said law a nd to work for
143
'"
Lf:GAl.
PRO"E SSIO~
1.45
' J l_
.,
146
147
"T he policy ofsu rvival in order to tide the Fili pinos to better times was the sole Purpose of my
government during the Japanese occupation .
-rs, b oo k wa s "The World in 2030 A.n . writl(>n by Uw Brit.ish II(OOll1 rscient ist Lord Birke nhead.
Salvad or II. Laurel beca me Se na to r and Vice Presid ent,
HR
LEGAL J'ROfo'Jo;SSION
14 ~1
The fam ous Ame ri can poet, Henry Wad sworth Longfellow,
had beautifu lly wri tten :
Lives of great m en a ll remi nd us
We can m ak e our li ves su blime,
A nd, depa rting , leave behind us
Footpri nts on t he sands of time. ..
''''
LEG.\L PROfo'lo:SSIGN
By
H o n . Josue N. BclJosillo
Th e Honorabl e Chief J us tice and Associa te Justices of t he Court,
Mem bers of th e 1999 Commi ttee on Bar Exami nat ion s,
Law Deans a nd Law Professo rs,
Th e Successfu l Exa min ees , thei r Paren ts , Rela t ives an d Fri ends.
Distinguished Gu ests, Ladies a nd Gt'n tlemen.
I t'l
152
I. EGAL PROFESSION
is not a coveted image to beh old! Time was when la w, medicine and th eology formed the classic triad of learned disciplines, each ministering to a ba sic concern of man - jus tice,
life and death. But one wonders now if law ia stil l part of that
triumvira te of a ncie nt professions. For its seems to he th e
fashion these days not onl y to a scribed to the law profession,
righ tly or wro ngly, the grievous si ns of falsehood, greed and
inju sti ce, bu t even to assail a nd undermine its worth.
Deside ri us Erasmus once said that lawyers were "the
most learned species of profoundly ign orant men! " An d an
epitaph on which wa s written, "He re lies a la wyer a nd a n
hon est man," elicited the wry obse rvation tha t times mu st
indeed he hard for t wo (2) person s to be buried in t he flame
grave! The implica tion of these , sad ly enough, is that the re
has been a virtua l abandonmen t by lawyers of the noble tenets of their profe ssion that endowed them, in the first place,
with mora l a scendan cy and suasion over their fellowmen .
ART I C;I.F ~
ON TilE
l.l~r.AL
P" OFl-;S."'ION
1!53
154
IS!)
LEGAL PRmT.S.<:;ION
a lways!
Uy
' Add rt' lIll delivered bydustice Panganibun. as b'UCllt of h oner, during
the ind uction of office rs or th e Cala mba Cily La wye rs League he ld on Au/{tUI t
24 , 200 1, at t he Monte Vista Soc ia l Hall , Punsol, C a la m ba, Laguna , cPu,,"
lished in UII! La w yere Rev iew, Vol. XV, Se pte mbe r 30 , 200 1),
Allow me to pun;uc t he paralleli sm even further by saying that la wyers, j ust like th eir reli giou s counterparts, should
be looked upon wit h res pect, ve nerat ion and esteem . Or are
they? Can we possibly eq uate the stat u s of lawyers with that
of the holy men ? Does the a p parent symmetry between the
leg al a nd the rel igious profession s crumble aga inst the realization t hat la wyers a re not ex actly a n admi red, a dored or
a d ulated lot?
156
Ill a rpl' r Collin". 1!:I98 ed.: see -Here '8 a n Idee : IA't '1I lle an 1I11 1..awy.-ra,"
7hd o.l' , AU f{UIlt 19, 20(H . p. 7.
2KI/"sooyu n M n!o:a l;' U', A U/{Ullt 2 00 1 i llIlUf', p. 57.
157
This see mingly "irre vere nt and irrecon cilable" ana logy,
although initia lly hard to compre hend, will be rele vant to those
who, like Atty. Capulong, consi der the legal profession as a
vocation or a calling in itself. In an y case , we ma y a s well
treat our work with a s much convict ion a nd pa ssion as reli gious cleri cs cheri sh theirs. More important, I a m sure t hat
there a re many of us who wish to venture into the journey of
life not on ly in the ways of the law, but in th e way s of the
Lord a s well.
Certainly, it would be unfa ir, if not imposs i ble , to im pose
the priestly vows of obedience, poverty and ch a stity on lawyers. I ca n e n umerate a nd expound on some of the reasons
why, but I am sure you already have a mill ion and one an swers to why we j us t can not embrace such vows. Let me instead share with you t hree (3) fundam ental princi ples whi ch
have come to be the cornerstones of my profess ion al a nd pereonal life. These rudimen ts ha ve consistently u nderscored my
speeches, because I be lieve that. they are timeless a nd ind ispensable in this brave new world of technological a dvancement, mod ernization a nd globa lization. Allow me then to discuss the important values whic h I refer to a a the three E's;
namely, excellence, ethics and eternity.
Excellence
LEGAL PROFESSION
158
% ill Code waa prlHnu!gat.ed by the Supreme Court on June 21, 1988.
It wall initi a lly drafted by t he lntegnt.ed Ba r of th e Phihp pinee ' Committee
on Responsibility, Disciplin e and Disbarment composed of Dean Irene COrte8
159
No less than ded ica tion, fervor a nd pa ssion should characterize our attitude tow ards the profeseic n . More t han the
egoti stic motivation of personal achievement, the dignity of
the lega l profession should be the primord ial consi deratio n in
a ll ou r undertakings. Indeed , the Code of Pro fessiona l Re s pons ibility mandates t ha t a la wyer shall a t all ti mes uphold
t he integrity and d igni ty of the legal profe ssion ."
As lawyers, we arc give n so much opportu nity to make
a difference in our comm unity, in our country an d in the world.
Indeed, there is so much t hat ca n be done a nd the re is 80
much we can do. Unfortunately, our idea lism and exuberance
a s young lawye rs to "ma ke a difference in society" soon dwin die into not hingness. This ha ppens wh en our concerns suddenl y shift to climb ing the corporate lad der, maki n g "big bucks"
and get ting head in ou r chose n career, These as pirations , al-
l Jo:GAL PROFf;SSION
160
Accordingly, la wyers s hou ld make their legal servi ces available in an efficie nt a n d con ven ient ma n ner compatible with the
independence , the in tegrity a nd th e effectiveness of'the pr ofes sio n. IO E xcept for valid rea son s th ey must not rej ect t he ca use
of the defen sel ess and the oppressed!' or withh old their se rvices from the nee dy.12 The blessin gs we share with others and
our good deed s that mak e a better world will live in the memory
of those we have helped , lon g after our personal ga ins and triumphs sha ll a lready be en lost a nd forgot ten.
Ethics
A discussion of the va lue of ethics would a ppear to be out
of place in this speec h, consi deri ng that we are a ll a ware of
the Code of Professional Responsibility. After having taken
legal ethics in law school a nd in the bar exams, we a re , in fact
presumed to know the conte nts of the Code (a t lea st its esse nce) by he art. A perusal of its important provisions will
provide guid elines on how to conduct ourselves a A lawye rs or
jurists. Be that as it may, let me just em phasize the hi er a rchy
of respon sibiliti es , whi ch should always be observed by all
lawyers in the performance of their duties.
It must always be remembered, fir st a nd foremost, that
lawyers are officers of the court with th e prima ry duty to see
to it that justice is served . 1b be sure, th ey sho uld exert effort
and cons ider it their duty to aseiat in the speedy a nd efficient
ad minis tratio n of j us tice .13 Thus, the interest of thei r clients
comes in a far second, ever subservient to the ca use of j ustice.
In thi s con necti on, it is impo rtant to note th at lawyers should
IOIbid.;
IIIbid.;
12Ibid .,
IaIbid .;
CarlUlI 2.
Rul t' 2.0l.
Ca lion 14.
Canon 12.
16 1
Frankly spea king, I se ri ously dou bt whethe r this threefold responsibility of lawyers is still bein g observe d by eve ry
one of us. I have come acro ss se ve ral cases involvi ng lawyers
who seem to have understood the hi erarchy of res pons ibilit ies
the other way a round. AB a matter of fact , some of the m have
com e to believe that their inte rest comes firs t , next is the
interest of their clie nts; a nd la stly, if a t nil, the inte res t of
justice .
For the guida nce of the bench a nd the bar, let me j ust
clarify that the Supreme Cou rt has not issued any ci rcular or
memorandum revers ing the lawyer's hierarchy of r-esponsib il'itie s . I hope thi s se rves as a reminder to all , lest you be deluded by th e actuations of some of our mis guided colleagu es.
Suffice it to say th at the Code a nd the Canons hav e be en
formulated and promulgated for the good of the legal profession and its mem bers . They a re there for the convenience, the
protection and the service of a ll lawyers. Accordingly, we owe
compliance, therewith, not only to ourselves a nd our peers ,
but to the profess ion a nd the cou ntry as well.
The va lue of ethics, which proce ed s frum personal integrity, moti va tes us to act in a ccordance with wha t ill true a nd
hon e st reg-ardless of personal conseque nces. Th act with in tegrity is to act with moral coura ge. In t hese times of material -
l'Ibid .; Canon
I ~Ibi(I. ; Ca non
15Ibid.; Canon
17Ibid .; Ca non
17.
16.
18.
19.
If>2
LEGAL PROFESSION
ARTICLt:S ON TilE LEGAL PROFESSIO:\
163
..
"'ON
By:
Atty. J ose Vietor V. C han -G onzaga"
INTROD UCTIO N
In 1999. when Olivetti s udde n ly took over Telecom Italia ,
not only were the fina ncial peopl e commuting to and from
Turin an d Rome; ra th er, t hey we re joined by lawyers from
British an d American law firms lik e Sulliva n & Cromwe ll a nd
Herbert Sm ith. Han d in hand with the Ita lian la wyers of
Eredee Aesocia ti, these foreign la wyers collaborated on such
issues as a ntit ru st a nd regula tory matters.
IMPLICATIO NS
Natu re of Practice of Law
Developmen ts a rou nd the world today can be rea sonab ly
expected to change the way we pe rceive the nature of la wyering, or even in defi ning the pract ice of law.
165
&20 1 SC RA 2 10 (1991).
' 52 Phil. 399.
7105 Phil. 173.
166
U :GAL
PHG F~SSI ON
!Note, how.. ver, that lila early all 1959 in Phil. lA w)'f'r1' A, s. v. Agrova
(l05 Phil. 1731, t ..... Court a lread y de fined "practice of la w~ in the conte xt of
interp retin g'and applyi ng la wlI a nd lega l prtnciples, an d 1I1,p lyinj{le!l"al know l
edge and train in j{.
vRu lX"n AlWa lo, Lega l l<:thics 28 .
IOUlep v. 1" '1':111 Clin k , Inc., 223 SC RA 378 ll993l.
r~OFESSION
167
inte rna t .icna l Iega l issu es, suc h argument may be inco nsisten t
with the ra t ional e for requ iri ng prior a dm is sion to the bar
before being a ble to pra ctice. Th e rigid r equir ements and conditions are not in tended to create a monopoly in the lega l
profession .t ! Rathe r, it is to p rotect the public, the court. the
client and the bar from th e incompetence a nd dishonesty of
those who are unfit to become members of the legal profes sion.12 And incompetence and d ishonesty a re lik ewise rele va nt
evils that the State will have eve ry right to guard agains t maybe espe cially so - in cases whe re t he advising counsel is
a foreign er who is abroad.
It cannot be denied a lso that in view of the in ternati onalization of a number of legal conce pts a nd issues. local clie nts
have to d raw more a nd more on the expertise and experience
of foreign law firm s, particula rly with respect to issues on
internation al Bale, t rans-continental, multi-modal trane portetion , a n ti-trust an d regulatory ma tte rs, multi-jurisd iction al
taxation , and eve n simple choice-of-law consi deratio ns .
This wri ter is not necessarily arguing, however, that the
said 'p ractice' be mad e illegal or irregular. It is merely p roposed that it is a phen omenon 'P t ha t s hould be recognized as
extant a s soon as possible, if only to provide for the proper
framework in wh ich "the public, the cou rt, the clier.t a nd the
bar" remains adequately protected,
Wh ether, therefore, it is a case of a foreign lawyer
'pr acticing la w' in the Philippin es hy eithe r coming here or
sending a dv ice through the internet, it is su bmitte d that globalization a nd tec h nology shall one day force th e Court to reexa mi ne simple tra ditional issues like "pr a ct ice of law" in a
milieu that shall make Cayetano u. Monsod see m lik e a k inderga rten lesson.
166
Profession or Track ?
It could also become necessary to determine whether in
t he worl d created by the digital revolution, the practice of law
shall rem ain a "hallowed profession ," or mere ly a "tradeable
service."
At th e ou tset, it should be empha sized that this section
is relevant only to a situ a tion wh ere no commerc ial presence
is yet al lowed in the loca lity.14
16'J
as any se rvice in any sector exce pt those su pplied in the exerci se of governmental authority. IS Unde r t he classifica tion
devised by the WTO Secretaria t, legal se rvices would fall under
the Bueinese Services, which inclu des p rofessional servi ces. HI
The GATS covers a ll four possible mode s of su pplying
services inte m ationally'" These are as follows:
Cross-border supply. This is a mode in which nei ther the producer nor the consumer moves physi cally, but in tera ct instead through a communication
or a telecommunications networ k. One can just
imagin e the potenti a l of the in te rnet for this Perticu lar mod e of supply. This mode of su pply is spc cially relevant to la wyers, who can now give legal
opinions or ad vis e to anyone anywhere in the world,
from anywhe re in t he world.
Presence of natural persons. This is where t he individual se rvi ce s u pplie r movcs temporarily to the
consumer 's count ry of residen ce. Bu t this doe s not
include a case where a foreign lawyer comes to the
Philippines to see k em ployment in our law firm s;
rather, that si tuat ion would rema in covered by our
immigration a nd la bor laws .
170
1lCh riawphe r Fi ndlay and 'Icny Warre n, TM GfoM rcd A.R-...mel'lt 01'1
7huie il'l &",ko-. (JIlt! Developi ng Erorwmj,. in the ESCAP Region , in IMPU CATIONS OF GENE RAL AGREEMENT ON TRADE IN SE RVICES FOR
ASIA-PACIF IC ECONOMIES 21 (2000).
D11le Ph ilipp ines mad e specific oommit menta on the teleeemm un ica ti ona Rector, finan cia l IIt'rviees. tra nspnrt Il<.~lor and tocrtem sector.
171
172
U<~GAL
PROFESSl0 N
"What we a re seeing is a n absolute scramble for internat ionalization," Alan Peck of F reshfield a, a London la w firm ,
told Newswee k in 1999 .2 Philippine legal educa tion, th erefor e, must res pond to tha t particular developmen t in th e profeasion, a nd pr epare Filipino lawyers in th e compe titio n th at
is soon to come. Lawye ri ng does not require capital not techno logy; it merely requ ire s t raining, hard-work, experience, and
pure gu ts and sa vvy. This is a n area of international trade
where th e playi ng field may virtually be level. Philippine la w
schools , th erefore, shou ld ensure that their s tudents are
equipped with the requisi te exposure to interna tional legal
iss ues, and more importan tly, imbued with the proper global
pe rspective.
And if the Ph ilippin es were to really look farther into the
futu re, local firms should think about expanding its operations, by affilia tion a t the very least , into other southeast Asia
and east Asian nations. For regardless of the 1997 financi al
crisis, these two region s from t he backbone of the promise of
t he 21st century, in te rms of trade, investmen ts a nd ca pital.
The geographical proximity, th e sha red history, and th e similar cultu res would se rve the Ph ilippines in good stead, in terms
of getting II foothold on some of th e more important capitals
like Singapore, J aka rta, Kuala Lumpur, Bangkok, Seoul, Toky o, a nd Beijing.
iJpa rcn llwl icully, it wa ll not too lonll ago !.hat quali fied Filip ino la wyen could a Ulumatica lly be admitted to certain America n Sta te Bara
"'Und,'r hi1l, sup m nnw 3, at 36.
173
2I; Kons u n ti n Rich ter, Si"l/fllJO'"t Allow' Law Firm li>nll.l" !" The Alian
Wall Street J ournal 2 (11-13 August 2(00).
31Microchip.. Modem.. and Medi a lnvade Mou nt OlympWI , XlV Tiu
Lo~n
M~h
2001).
Li':GAL PROFJ-;SSION
lional noti ons of evidence, cont racts , lax a tion a nd even, constl t c tional la w. Our la wyers must necessarily be equipped with
the skill and information necessary to contin ue being relevant
in a legal world that will no longer be content with a knowledge of our a ncient and ana chronistic legal codes.
'"
t
i
of Competence, http:!
175
176
LF.GAL PROFESSION
By,
Senior Associate Justice Josu e N. Bellosillo
'Ib be in the good compa ny of Capiz Lawyers, a s I am
this evening, is a lways a great source of joy an d inspiration
for me, a nd I a m confide n t the feeling is mu tual! For, so mu ch
is gaine d in t he genuine cam a ra derie tha t an a ssembly of
la wyers pr ovides. It gene rates a comforting assurance th at
.the law profession is well an d very much ali ve, a nd th at the
la w contin ues to play 8 vital role in the regulation of the
a ffairs of men a nd society. That, I a m sure, is the main concern of the President of the Integrated Ba r of the Philippines!
An d thut is why he is with us this evening.
J wa s with Atty. Arthur D. Lim 186t Wednesday at the
Awards Night of the Su preme Court Searc h for Centennial
Judges a nd Court Employees a t the Westin Philippine Plaza,
wh ere we were both in the Board of Judges, and it wa s there
whe re I learned that he was coming to Ro:I88 City for this
Affair. Of course, I was happy that he would make his officia l
visit to our Chapter a nd a t the same time induct its officers.
I would say that it is indeed a great honor for our officers to
be installed by the Presiden t of the IBP.
111
II'.
'u
17'
I7! 1
180
turning back from the detritu s of old practices a nd met hodologil'S th at no longer work in a ra pid ly cha nging envi ron ment.
India n t ri bal wi sd om say as t hat when yo u di s cover t hat
PROFr:~ION
social dev elopments. We m us t determin e our core compete cit's, wh ich may cove r commu n ication s kills, logic and reasonin g a n d information gat heri ng and data a nalysis. WI' mu st he
able to id entify ou r core se rvi ces - serv ices th a t h a ve real
va lue to ou r clients a nd to ou rselves, se rvi ces tha t a re pe rfonn ed n ot only for materia l profi t bu t for thei r in tri nsi c va lue
to t he in d ividual a nd the comm u nity. F ina lly, we m ust stu dy
trends, both globa l a nd profession al - th e info-globalization
of the la w, t he commerc ia liza tion of the la w, t he eocio-cultu re
aspect of law, and th e polit iciza tion of law.
My fri ends, we ca n no t in sist ri din g t he prove rb ia l de ad
hors e while all other professions a rc mount ing spi rited charges
ga llo ping at full s peed toward s new p ossibiliti es a n d a new
a ge . We ca nno t afford to be left behind. en sconced in ou r ow n
private comfort zones a nd say th a t we will on ly cross t he
bri dge when we reach t h ere. We do n ot a lways go where t he
path le ads; we also go wh ere there is no path , and blaze a
trail!
We need to blaze a t ra il. We nee d to re invent ou rselves
and "step out of the frame !" We need II n ew vision of intellige nce
a nd the i ntelligence of vi sion t h at will lead us to qu es tion our
us ual a ssumptio ns, to rein in our judgmen ts and to take a fresh
look at the law profession in rela tion to t he wor ld a ro u nd u s,
exam ine what we really k now about it and determine wh at we
wa nt from it. We mu st do this to chart t h e des tiny of the profess ion we all love, a nd save ours elves a nd t he profes sion from th e
terrible fate of irrelev ance and m argina li za ti on, a n d u ltimately,
from possi ble extinction . Thi s is my challenge to you, now, m ore
than eve r, ladies a nd gen tl emen of'the Capiz Chapter, In tegrated
Ba r of the Philippines !
182
:"Jo:GAL I'ROFES.<;ION
mote a nd more challenging conce pts of health, longevity, huma n wellncs s, ethnics, morality a nd the very ca use and CIIsence ofl ife itself. In tum , the se new scie nces will cause - as
in fa ct they are now causing - me ga -sh ins in the ways of
discove ri n g and precessing t ruth, matters tha t will profou ndly
a nd r ad ically a ffect judicia l dispensati on.
Hy
1113
Initi all y, I hope to respo nd this question by giving a survey of the poss ible ans wers of the variou s judicial a ut horities in
my part of the world - As ia. However, limitation s of ti me do
not a llow s uch extended discu ssion . It is, on the other hand,
more than a consola tion th a t a nothe r member of our pa ne l,
Judge Clifford Wall ace - a member of the US Court ofAppeals
a nd a con sultant of more tha n 40 judicial authorities worldwid e - would probably take this up when he speaks a fter me.
Le t m e then answer the qu ery from the point of view of
the Philippine judiciary. I will begin by relating that three
weeks a go, on J une 11, 2001 , the Philippin e Su preme Court
celebrated its cente nary A hundred years ago, the Secon d
Philippine Commission in our country establishe d this Court
8S well aa the lower courts: the Courts of F irs t Instance and
t he Justi ce of the Peace courts. This Commission had been
tas ke d by the US government with t he mission of setti ng up
a civil govern ment to repl ace 8 military group that took cont rol after th e Ph ilippine Islands were ceded by Spain to t he
US th rough the 1898 Treaty of Pari s whi ch ended the Spanish -American War.
Eve n before 190 1, however, ther e had been courts existing in ou r country like the one t hat we re esta blishe d by the
US mil ita ry an d the Spa nis h conqu istadores, an d th at lasted
".
LF.GAL PROFF,sSION
for al most 400 ye a rs . But we reckon the founding of ou r Su p reme Court on ly in 1901 , because it wa s only in tha t year
th a t a tribun al which e njoye d judicial independence, 88 we
know it today, wa s set up. Since then, th e Cou rt h a s fu nct ioned ind ependently of the other branch es of governme nt like
t he execu tive and t he legi sla tive . I mu st add, though , that its
decision were a ppealab le to the US Suprem e Cou rt, until in
1946 wh en th e US withdrew its sovereign cla ims ove r our
co u n t ry.
By independent I mea n :
1)
2)
It ha s fiscal independence guaran teed byour Constitution. AB a conseq uence, Congress cannot decrease
judicia l a ppropria tions given the previous year.
3)
2)
~ra v ity
l l;.'i
process.
3)
4)
Con trol of admi s sion to the p r ncticc of law a nd discipli ne of er-ri ng la wye rs .
5)
a)
Third, by its admi nistrat ion of bn r e xe minatione, it influen ces d irectl y the cu rri cula of la w schools. It also directly
provides , through its ed ucation arm , t he Philippin e Judicia l
Academy, con ti nuing lega l ed ucation for j udges and qua si-ju d icia l office rs .
b)
Fourth , th rough its power to d iscipline lower court magistra te s , the Supreme Court assures uniform applicat ion of
I.EGAL PROFES..:;ION
186
or Discovering Truth
1 thank you ,
187
By
In my research for a new book about the unhealthy effects of a mbition and ego in the lega l profes sion, 1 sent 8
questionnaire to more tha n 500 lawyers throughou t America.
Wh at 1 found is that lawyers, on the whole are dissatisfied
with wh a t they ha ve and a re striving for m ore.
Wha t thi s la wyer may ha ve see n in that a rti cle has been
cha ra cterized by Ken Keyes and other modern thinkers as
"Published in the Lawyer '. Review, Vol. XIII , 31 October 1999 .
"Head of ma llll Iort de pt. at Levin, Middlebroolui, Thoma Mitchi'll,
Gree n, Echsner, Proctor & Papanlonio, Peneeeole, Fl cri d e , USA.
L.EGAL 1'}{(lJo'ESSION
168
Most of the time , t hey a re willing to defer enjoym ent of the possessions they now have whil e they
work to obtain more or bigger possessions.
Once they exce l, th ey mentally ra ise their expectation s of what they h ave to ach ieve or accomplish
next .
169
Chapter XIV
19 1
EN BANC
BAIl MAITEIl NO. 85Q
MANDATOIlY CONTINUING LE GAL EDUCATIO N
(MC LE )
SECTION 1. Commencement of the MCLE Comm ittee. Within two (2) month s from the approval of these Ru les by
the Supreme Court En Bane. t he MCLE Co mm ittee shall
be con st itu ted and sha ll comme nce the im plementation of
the Mand ato ry Continuing Lega l Education (MCLE) program
in accor da nce with th ese Ru les.
IlESOLlITION
ADOPTING THE IlULES ON MANDATOIlY
CO NTINUlNG LEGAL EDUCATION FOil
MEMBEIlS OF THE INTEGRATED BAIl OF TIlE
PHILIPPINES
(As amended , Oct. 2, 200 1)
SEC. 2. Requirements of completion of MCLE. - Me mbe rs of t he IB P not exempt under Rule 7 shall complete every
three (3) years at least thi rty-six (36) hours of contin uing
legal education acti vities approved by the MCLE Commit te e.
Of the 36 hours:
(a) At lea st six (6) hou rs shall be devoted to legal ethics equivalent to six (6) credit units.
(b) At least four (4) hours shall be devote d to trial and
pre-trial skills equivalent to four (4) credit units.
(e) At least five (5) ho urs shall be devoted to alter nati ve dispute resolution equivalent to fi ve (5) credi t unit s.
Rule I. PURPOSE
(0
At lea st two (2) hou rs sha ll be de vote d to Inte rne ti on a ll aw and internationa l conventions equi valent to two (2)
credit units.
192
Ru le 3. COMPLIANCE PERIOD
193
Neierthelese, members may participate in any legal ed ucati on activity wherever it may be avail able to earn credit unit
toward complia nce with the MCLE Requiremen t.
SEC. 3. Compliance pe riod of membe rs adm itted or readmitted after establishme nt of the p rogram . - Me mbers a dmitted or readmitted afte r the establishment of the program shall
be pe nnanen tly assign ed to the a ppropriate Compliance Grou p
based on their Chapte r membe rship on the date of ad mission or
readm ission.
The initial compliance peri od a fte r admi ssion or readmission a nd shall begin on the first day of t he month of a dmission
or read mission a nd shall end on the same day as that of a ll
other members in the same Com pliance Group.
(a) Where four (4) months or less rema in of the init ia l
complia nce period after admission or rea dmission, the membe r
is not required to com ply with the progra m requirement for the
ini tial compliance.
(b) Where more th an four (4) mon ths rem ai n of the initi al compliance pe riod afte r a dmissio n or readmission, the mem-
PROGRAMSI
ACTIVITY
CRE DIT
UNITS
SUPPORTING
DOCUMENTS
L!':GAL PROFESSION
19.
2.
EGORY
TOR
(c) Teachin g in
view class.
PUBLISHED NEWS
LEnER/JOURNAL
SE C. 3 Claim for non-participatory credit units. _ Nonparticipatory cred it uni ts may be claimcd per complian ce period for:
(a ) Preparing, as an author or co-aut hor, written mate .
rials published or accepted for publication , e.g., in the fonn of
an article, chapter, book, or book revie w wh ich contribute to
the legal education of th e author member, which were not
prepared in th e ord ina ry course of th e member's practice or
empl oyme nt.
fl
195
(b)
(a) The President and the Vice P resident of the Philippines, and the Secretaries and Undersecretaries of Executive
Departmenta;
SEC. 2. Cla im for participatory credit units. - Participatory credi t units may be claimed for:
tive s;
(a) Attending approved edu cation activities like semina rs , conferences, conventions, sym posia, in-house education
programs, work shops, dialogues or round table discu ssion.
(b) Speaking or lect uri ng, or acting as assign ed pan elist,
reactor, commentator, reso urce speaker, moderator, coordinator or facilitator in approved education activities.
(b)
~.
LF.G AL PROFF_'l..<:;ION
196
197
(g )
d icial functions:
(j)
Incumbent deans. ba r reviewe rs a nd profe ssors of
la w who ha ve teaching experience for at lea st ten (0) years
in accredited law schools ;
Governors a nd Mayors.
SEC. 2. Other parties exempted from ttu M CLE. following Members of the Bar a re likewise exempt:
(a)
The
(b) Those who hav e retired from law practice with the
approval of the IBP Board of Governors.
1"
participants identifying the tim e, date, location, s ubject matter a nd length of th e activity.
Com mittee;
(b)
(e)
(b)
199
III
il
iII
200
R ule
u,
201
G ENERAL COMPLIANCE
PROC. :nURES
SE C. 2. No n -com pl ia nce notice a nd 60-day period to attai n compliance. - Members failing to com ply will receive II
Non-Complia nce Notice sla ting the specific defi cien cy and will
be give n sixty (60 ) days from the dale of notifica tion to file a
response clari fyi ng the deficiency or oth erwise showing com pliance with t he requirements. S uch noti ce shall contain th e
following la ngu age ne ar the begi n ning of the notice in ca pita l
letters :
The
Members gi ven sixty (60) days to res pon d to a Non-Complia nce No tice may use thi s pe riod to a ttai n the ad equa te
number of credit units for com plia nce . Credit units earned
during thi s period may only be cou nted tow a rd compliance
with the prior complia nce per iod req uirement unl ess u nits in
excess of the requirement a re earned , in which case the e xcess
may be counted toward meeting th e cu r rent complia nce period requirement.
202
LEGAL
l'ROFESSJO~
MCLE Committee. The investigation of a membe r for n oncompli a nce shall be conducted by th e IB P's Com mission on
Bar Discipline as a fa ct-find ing ann of th e M~ LE Committee.
SEC . 3. A ccrual of membership fee. - Mem bersh ip fees
shall conti nue to accrue a t th e active rate aga inst a member
during th e perio d he/she is listed 8 S a delinquent membe r.
203
for a term of three (3) years an d sha ll receive such compensat ion as may be determined by t he Court.
SEC. 2. Duty ofthe Committee. - The MCLE Committee
sha lt a dministe r and adopt such imp lementing ru les as may
be nece ssary subject to the a pprova l by the Supre me Court. It
sha ll, in consultation with the IBP Boa rd of Governors, pr escribe a sched ule of MCLE fees with the approva l of the Su preme Court.
R u le 14. REINSTATEMENT
SECTION 1. Process. - The involu nta ry listing as a
delinquent member shall be determi ned when th e me mber
pro vides proof of complia nce with the MCLE requirement,
including paym ent of non-complian ce fee. A member may attain the necessary cred it unite to meet the requirement for
the peri od or non-compliance during the period the member is
on ina ctive status. These credit uni ts m ay n ot be counted
toward meetin g the current complia nce period requirement.
Credit units earned d u ring th e period of non-complian ce in
excess of th e number needed to sa tisfy th e prio r compliance
period requirem ent may be counted towa rd meeting th e current compliance period requirement .
SE C. 2. Termination (If deli nquent li sti ng is a n administrative process. - The termina tion of listing a s a delinquent
member is administrative in na ture AND it shall be made by
the MCLE Committee.
Rule 15. CO MMI'ITEE ON MANDATORY
CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION
th e Supreme Court as Cha ir, and four (4) members respect ively nominated by the 18P, th e Philippine Judicia l Academy,
a law cente r de sign a ted by the Supreme Court and associa ti ons of law schools a nd/or la w professors.
LTht" Ru le. was rev ised by the Supreme Cou rt on 2 Oct.ober 2001.
204
a s u rprise to som e when it was finali zed. "'"h ile ot he r professions s upervised by t he Professional Regulations Com mission
have been required for so me time now to comply with the socalled "con ti n uin g pro fessional education ," it was onl y v ery
recently that th e legal professio n adopte d its very own sim ila r
progra m .
"Se ction 1. Pu rpose of the MCLE. - Cont inu ing lega l ed ucation is requ ired of members of th e
Integrated Ba r of th e Ph ilippi nes (lBP) t o ensu re
that thro ughout their career, th ey keep abreas t with
law and jurisprudence, maintain the ethics of th e
profession and enha nce the sta nda rds of the practice of la w."
In essence , the MCLE calls for the participation of lawyers in legal ed ucation activit ies a nd completion of at least
thirty-six (36 ) hours of sa id activities a pproved by the MCLE
Committee, aM a condition sine qua non for them to be considered as having in good and regular standing lind not a deli nq uent member . The Supreme Court has laid down the subje cts to wh ich these activities mu st involve, and the nu m ber
of hours to he d evote d to each . Hence, at least six (6) hours
must be dedicated to lega l eth ics, four (4) hou rs to trial and
pre-trial ski lls, five (5) huurs to alte rnative d isp ute resolu ti ons, nin e (9) hours to updates on substantive e nd procedural
laws, a nd juriaprudence, four (4) hou rs to legal writing a nd
o ral advocacy, two (2) hours to international la w and in te rnation a l convent ions , a nd six (6) hours to such su bjects as may
be pres cribed by the MCLE Committee.e
The a bove requirement must be complied with within a
three...year period . The MCLE does not cover all la wyers though .
Some a rc admittedly exe mpte d, lI S provi ded for in Sect ion 7 of
the Rules on MCLE. g HHentially, all la wyers who are act ively
3Sec. 2, Ru le 2, ill .
CONTJ"'1JING
U~GAL
EDUCATION FO R LAWYERS
205
206
LEGAL PROFES..'HOK
207
"x x x
(a) The activity sha ll have the sign ificant
curre nt in tellectual or practical content .
I
I'
III
ultimately. they draw out issues that hav e lega l significa nce.
Lawyers cannot brush a side these concerns , on t he assum ption that they are not purely legal matters . No matter how
diminutive the legal implications of these concern s are, it
cannot be denied tha t they carry some influence in the law,
and are in themselves influen ced by the law. It therefore
becomes essential for lawyers, in the discharge of their duties
to society a nd the public, to be a wa re of these concerns, and
the MeLE equips them with such awareness, wh ich in the
end brings about proficiency.
208
2\) 9
"CANO N 12 - A lawyer shall exert every effort and con sider it his duty to assi st in the spee dy
and efficie n t administrat ion of j us tice .
x x x
x x x"
As the MCLE devote s five (5) hours to a lterna tive dispule resolution, it is hop ed , nay expecte d, tha t there would be
a major reduction in th e filing of unmerito rious cases, or at
the very lea st, there would be an increa se in the early termin ation of the same.
I. ~~GA.L
210
PHOFESSION
In lit iga tion , t he re exists the idea that cases are won, to
some extent, by th e ple adings submitted a nd filed in courts.
How well a docume nt is written is th erefore impo rtant as it
could tra nslate to victo ry or defea t . It can neve r be emphasiz ed enough th at lawyers a rc a lways ta ught of th e valu e of
a clear, concise pleading. This holds true eve n for non-litigation papers . Lega l docum e nts, whether to be used in court or
not , need to comply with bas ic require ments la id down by t he
la w. Lawyers may neve r forget th ese elementary rules . But as
laws develop , so do such r-ules. In the sa me breath , la wye rs
61'hiJ. Lawyers AstIn. VlI. Agrava, 105 Phil. 173, al80 in Cayplaoo V8.
Mon...sd.
' People va. Villa nue va, 14 SC RA 109 .
"&>c. 2, Rultl 7.
211
~lhil.
are a lways required to contain th eir oral argu ments wit hin
th e bounds of the la w. They should not pu t up s uch argumen ts j ust for the sa ke of it. Their beliefs are ofte ntimes affected by wh at they know. The MeLlo: is not pre tentious as to
in still certain st y les or writing or s pea king, for styles a re
developed by lawyers them selves. Legal education tries to ta p
into and work on the talen ts of la wyers, a nd not cont rol them.
It merely upgra des them with the lates t ad vancem ent in th ese
a re as, in the hope that they would be applied eventua lly in
the pr actice of la w.
212
Certainly, a s society moves in the threshold of moderniza ti on or globalization, d ealin gs with other socie t ies become
inevitable. AB t hese societi es are governed by t heir own la ws,
which may be d ifferent from ours , conflicts a rise. Lawyers,
who are a lways looked. up to in cases of problems, need then
to focus some a ttent ion on theses issues . Th ey however can not
mainl y rely on the knowledge they hav e acquired through th e
years in dealing with suc h issu es . As a lready d iscussed, laws
a re a lways in a state of evolution. Th ey are regula rly a ltered
a nd modi fied to comply with th e changi ng needs of time. Thi s
is even tru er in the ca se of international la ws , which more
often than not, a re generally ign ored by lawyers, for appare ntly having little sign ificance in our lives. In t he end however, such changes wou ld affect our ve ry own society, 8 S it
moves towards modern times. With the influ x of progressive
way s of life, it is now important for la wyers to keep abrea st
with the highly unpredictable lega l cha nges in the in ternationa l community. By doing so, they become globa lly competitive a nd thus a t par with their internationa l counterparts,
thus enhancing thei r status as professionals .
Despite t he fa ct that continuing legal ed uca tion ha s been
around for qui te some tim e now, its being .mandato ry is a
rela tively new concept. How it wou ld work to ac hie ve its goals
rem ai ns to be seen. It ha s bee n obse rved tha t man y lawyers
have ru shed into pa rticipating in MCl.g - accred ited act ivities, not because of thei r as pira tion to lea rn. The y ha ve heen
motivated in to joining such activi ties only for purposes of
complia nce with the req uir emen ts . It if! hope t hat thi s a ppre-
2 13
215
Chapter XV
PRACTICAL TIPS FOR LAW STUDENTS
Studying law is not a n ea sy task. The method of instructi on in the la w school is far different from those em ployed in
other fields of study. Upon hili entrance in the classroom , a
law student ia expected t o know a lrea dy the lesson fOT a parti cular d aRB. Th e so-called "Spoon Feeding" method of teaching is seldom used if not di scoura ged in the law school. La w
students a rc trained to be self-depe ndent not to rely on th e
inputs to be given by the professor. Th e only role of the professor is to guide the stude nt in the proper course of a nalysis,
stu dy habits a nd in proper cases, me morization . It is only
after determining t he capa city of the students to comprehe nd ,
a nalyze and absorb th e is sue or subject matte r of the topic
shall th e professor supply the deficien cy.
Becauae of the kind of tra ining most law school s give
th e ir students, it is important for a stude nt to muster the
techniques in th e study of law.
a)
214
80
l.F..GAL I'P.OFJo';.SSION
216
e)
217
I mp rove penmanship
Almos t al ways, law deala with the a pplicatio n of cornmon sense. In studying la w, always switch on you r faculty of
reasoning and logic.
S(l ~f E
Chapter XVI
SOME BASIC LEGAL PRINCIPLES
AND MAXIMS
219
13.
Delegare Non Poteet Delegare - Wh at has bee n delegated ca nnot he fu rther delegated.
14 .
Deluo -
15.
Dolo -
16.
17.
18.
Felony.
Deceit (Fra ud).
1.
19.
2.
20 .
3.
21.
4.
Actus Non Facit Reum, Nisi Mens Sit Rea - The act
does not make a person criminal unless his mind be
22 .
23.
24 .
Inter Vivos -
25.
Jus Disponendi -
26 .
J U3 Fru endi -
27 .
Jus Utendi -
28.
Ju s Ven d ican di -
crimina l.
5.
Anim us Ma nendi -
6.
Animu s Revertendi -
7.
Caso Fortuito -
8.
Ca usa Proxima N on Remota Spectatur - Th e law considers th e proxima te ca use and not the remote one.
9.
Caveat E mptor -
10 .
Corpus Delicti -
ll.
Culpa -
12.
Da m nu m Absque I nju ria - Damage without legal inj ury. Th ere ca n be dam a ge without legal inj ury in those
in stances in wh ich the loss was n ot the res ult of a violation of a leg al injury.
Intention to remain .
Intention to return.
Fault.
2 18
29 .
Fal se in one,
In equ al fault.
30.
3 1.
32.
Morti s Causa -
By reason of death.
220
33.
34.
Nullum Crimen, N ulla Poena Sine Lege crime if there is no law punishing it.
There is no
35.
LAWYER'S OATH
36.
37.
38 .
39.
Res Nulliu s -
40.
41.
42.
13.
44.
Ubi lex non dis tinguit, nee nos d istinguere debe mus When the law does not distingu ish, we must not di stingui sh,
45 .
Void Ab Initio -
I, (state the name), do solem nly swea r that I will m a in tain a llegiance to the Rep ublic of the Philippines; ] will sur port its Constitution and obe y t he la ws 8 S well as the lega l
orders of the duly cons tituted a uthori tie s therein ; ] will do no
fa lsehood , nor consent to the doin g of a ny in court; I will not
wittingly or willingly promote or sue a ny groundless, fal se or
unlawful sui t, nor gi ve ai d nor conse n t to t he same; I will
delay no man for money or malice, and will cond uct myse lf as
a lawyer according to the be st of my knowledge and d iscreti on, with all good fid eli ty as well to the courts as to my
clients; and I im pose upon my se lf this volu ntary oblig ation
without a ny mental reservation or purposes of evasion . So
he lp me God,
221
I
APP ENDIX "B"
Rule 138
ATTORNEYS AND ADMISSION TO BAR
SE CTION 1. Who may practice law. - Any person heretofore duly admitted as a member of th e bar, or th ereafter
admi tte d 8S su ch in accordance with th e provisions of thi s
role, and who is in good and regular standing, is entitled to
pra ctice law.
SEC. 2. R equ irements (or all applicants for admiss ion to
the bar. - Every a pplicant for admiss ion as a member of th e
bar mu st be a citizen of th e Philippines, at least twenty-one
years of age, of good mor al cha racter, and a residen t of th e
Philippines; a nd mu st produce before the Su prem e Court sa tisfactory evidence of good moral character, and th at no charges
agains t him , invol ving moral turpitude, have been filed or are
pending in any court of th e Philippines .
SEC. 3. Requirements for la wyers who are citizens of th e
United S tates of America . - Citi zens of the Un ited St ates of
America who, before July 4, 1946 , were du ly licensed members of th e Philippine Bar, in active practice in the courts of
th e Philippines a nd in good a nd regular sta nding 8 S such
may, upon sa tis factory proof of these facts before th e Supreme
Court, be a llowed to continue such pr actice afte r taking the
following oath of office.
"I, <State the Name), ha ving been permi tted to
continue in the pr actice of law in th e Philippines ,
do solemnly swea r th at I recognize the su pre me
a uthori ty of the Republic of th e Philippines; I will
support its Cons titution and obey th e laws as well
222
:123
as th e legal orders of t he duly cons tituted au thori ties therein; I will do no fal sehood, nor consent to
the doing of any in court; J will not wittingly or
willi ngly promote or S UI! a ny woundless, false or
unla wful suit, nor give a id nor consent to the same;
I will delay 110 man for money or malice, and will
conduct my self as a la wyer according to the bes t of
my knowled ge a nd discret ion with a ll good fidelity
8 S well to the courts as to my clien ts; a nd I impose
upon myself thi s voluntary obligation wit hout any
men tal reservati on or pu rpo se of evasion. So hel p
me God."
SE C. 4. Requirements (or applicants from other jurisdictions. - Applica nts for admission who, being Filipino citizens,
a re enro lled attorneys in good standing in th e Su preme Cou rt
of t he Uni ted Sta tes or in a ny other circuit Cou rt of Appeal s
or dis trict court therein, or in the highest court of any Slate
or Terri tory of th e United Sta tes, a nd who ca n show by satisfac tory certifica tes that th ey ha ve practiced at leas t five
yea rs in a ny of sa id courts, th at s uch practice began before
July 4, 1946 , a nd that they have never been suspended or
di sbarred, may, in th e discretion of th e Court, be admit te d
without examina tion.
SE C. 5. Addition al requirements (or other applica nts . All applicants for admiss ion other th an those referred to in
the two pre ceding sections shall, before being admit ted to the
examinati on, sat isfactori ly show that th ey have regu larly stud ied la w for four years , a nd succe ssfully completed a ll prescri bed cou rses, in a law school or university, officially a pproved and recogni zed by the Secretary of Education. The
affidavit of the ca ndida te, accompa nied by a certificate from
the university or school of law, shall be filed as evide nce of
such facta, a nd further eviden ce may be requ ired by the court.
No a pplica nt shall be admitted to the bar exam ination
unless he h as satisfactori ly completed the following cou rses in
a law school or un iversity dul y recognized by th e govern ment :
civil la w, commercia l law, re medial la w, crimi nal law, publi c
a nd pri va te in ternational law, politi cal law, labor and social
legisla tio n, medi cal jurisprude nce, taxation a nd legal ethics.
d
I
I
I
22'
APPt~NDIX
- B"
225
SEC. 1I. A nnu al examination . - Examina ti ons for adm ission to t he ba r of the Philippines shall take pla ce an n ua lly
in the City of Manila. They shall be held in four days to be
designated by the chairman of the comm ittee on ba r examine rs . The s ubject shall be d istribu ted as follows: First day:
Political and Inte rnationa l La w (morning ) a nd Labor a nd Social
Legi sla tion (afternoon); Secon d day: Civi l La w (morni ng) and
Taxation (afternoon); Third day : Me rca ntile Law (moming)
and Cri m inal Law (afternoon ); Fourth day: Remedia l La w
(morn ing) a nd Legal Et hics a nd P ractical Exerc ises (afternoon ).
S EC. 9. Examination; subjects. - Applicant.s, not otherwise provided for in sections 3 a nd 4 of this rule, shall be
subjected to examinations in the followin g subjects: Civil La w;
Labor a nd Social Legislation; Mercantile Law; Cri minal Law;
Political Law (Const itutional Law, Pub lic Corporations, and
Public Officers); International La w (Private and Publ ic); Taxation ; Remedial La w (Civi l Procedure, Criminal Procedure, a nd
Evidence); Legal Ethics a nd Practica l Exer cises (in Pleading
a nd Conveyancing).
,.."
LEGAL "UOfESSIO N
oth er nor sha ll they give or re ceive any ass istance. The can dldate wh o viola tes this pro vision , or a ny other pr ovision of this
ru le, s hall be barred from t h e exami nation, and th e same to
count as a fail ure against him, a nd further disciplinary nction, including perm anent di squalification , may be taken in
t he d iscretion of the court.
SEC. 14. Passing a verage. - I n order th at a candidate
may be deemed to ha ve passed his exam inations successfully,
he must h ave obtained a ge neral a ve rage of 75 per ce nt in a ll
su bjects , with out fa ili ng be lo w 50 per cent in any s u bject, ( 0
determining the average, the subjects in the examination shall
be give n the following relative weights: Civil La....., 15 per ce nt;
Labor and Social Le gislation , 10 per cent; Mercantile Law, 15
pe r cent; Cri minal Law, 10 per cent ; Pol itical find In tern eti onal La w, 15 per ce nt ; Tax ation, 10 per ce nt; Remedial Law,
20 per cent; Legal Ethics a n d Practical Exercises, 5 per cent.
SE C. 15. Report of th e Com m ittee; filing of exa mina tion
Not la te r than F ebrua ry 15t h after th e ex amination, or as 800n a s t hereafter ne m ay be practicable , the comm ittee shall file its report on the result of such exam inati on.
Th e exa mi na tion papers a n d notes of t he committee sh a ll be
filed with the clerk a nd may there be exam ined by t he parties
in interest, afte r t h e court h a s a pp roved t he report.
papers. -
SE C. 16. Failing candidates to take review course. Cand idates who hav e failed t h e bar exam inations for three
t imes shall be di squalified from taking' a n ot her exam ination
u n less they show to the satisfac t ion of the court that t hey
ha ve enrolled in and passed regular fourth year review classes
as well as attende d a pre- b a r review cou rse in a recogni zed
la w school.
The professors of t he indi vidu a l review subjects attended
by t h e ca ndidates u nder this rule s hall certify unde r oa t h that
t h e ca ndidates ha ve regularly a t ten ded classes and pa ssed
the s ubjects under t he sa me cond it ions as ordinary stu dents
a n d the rat ings obtained by t h em in the particul a r subj ect.
SEC . 17. A d mission and oath of successful applicanie. >
An appli ca nt wh o h UB pa s sed the required exa mi nation. or
APl'gNDIX
-n-
227
I t is t he duty of 811 a t.
a)
To maintain allegiance to the Repub lic of the Phil .
ippinea and s u p po rt the Constitution a n d obey th e Jaws of th e
Philippines.
b) To observe a nd ma intain the respect due to t he
cou rts of justice An d jud icia l officers;
c)
To couns elor mai ntai n such actions or proceedings
only as a ppea r to him to be j us t, and s uc h d efenses only as he
be liev es to be h on es tly debatable u nder the law;
I,
III
2:.!R
API'I<:NDIX
-u-
229
230
211
LEGAL PROFESSI ON
APPENDIX
"e"
RULE 138-A
LAW STUDENT PRACTICE RULE
233
I
APPENDIX " 0"
RULE 139
DISBAR MENT OR SUSPENSION
OF ATTORNEYS
SECT ION 1. Motion or complain t. - P roceedi ngs for t he
removal or sus pe ns ion of at torn eys may be take n by the Suprem e Court on its own motion or upon the compla in t under
oat h of anoth er in writing. The complaint shall set out distinct.ly, clearly, a nd concisely the facts complai ned of, su pported by affidavi ts, if a ny. of persons h aving person al knowl ed ge of the facts therein a lleged an d sh all be accom pa nied
with copies of such documen ts 8 S may subs tantia te sai d facts .
AI-'PENDI X
~ D"
235
236
LEC.\L PROFESSION
APPENDIX "E"
RULE 139A
237
APPENDIX "EO
I.EGAI. PROFESSION
23>3
Th e sub-province of Aurora ;
(b)
(c)
Qu ezon City ;
(d)
(e) Pa say City, Mak ati, Mandalu yong and San Juan
d el Monte ;
<0
(g)
239
Unless he oth erwise regi ste rs his prefe rence for n pa rt icular Chap ter, a la wyer sha ll be consi dered a m embers of
the Cha pter of the Provin ce, city, polit ical su bdi visio n or area
where hi s office or, in the abse nce th e r-eof h is residence is
loca te d. In no case s hall an)' la wyer be a member of more than
one Chap te r.
Ea ch Cha pter shall have its own local government as
provided for by uniform rules to be prescri bed by t he Boa rd of
Governors and a pp roved by the Supreme Court, t he provisions of S ect ion 19 of th is Rule not with standi ng.
Chapters belongin g to the sa me Regio n shall hold r egi ona l con ventions on matters a nd problem s of common concern.
SE C. 5. House of Delegates . - The Integra ted Ba r shall
ha ve a House of Delegates of not more than one hu ndred
twenty members who sha ll be a pportione d among all the
Cha pters as nearly as may be according to t he nu mber of
their re spective members, but each Cha p ter shall hav e at lea st
one Delega te . On or before Decembe r 3 1, 1974 , a n d e very four
yea rs thereafter, the Boa rd of Governors sha ll make a n a pportionment of Delega te s .
The term of the office or Delegates sh a ll begi n on the
d ate of the opening of t he an n ua l convention of th e House a nd
sha ll end on the day immediate ly pre ceding the date of the
opening of the next succeeding annua l conv ention. No person
may be a Delega te for more tha n two terms.
The House shall hold an annu al conve ntion at t he call or
the Board of Governors a t any time du ring the month of April
of eac h year for the e lection of Governors, t he rea din g a nd
d iscussion of reports incl u ding the a nn ual re port of the Board
of Governors, the transaction of such other busin ess as may
be referred to it by the Board a nd the cons ide rat ion of such
a dditiona l ma tters 8S may be requested in w riting by a t least
twenty Delegates , Speci a l conventions of the House ma y be
ca lled by the Board of Governors to consider onl y s uch matte rs as t he Boa rd sha ll i nd icate. A maj ori ty of t he Delega tes
240
who ha ve registered for a conve ntion, whether an nual or special , shall constitute a quorum to do hu ainese.
I
I
APPENDIX _I:,...
241
The Board shall prescribe suc h ot he r rules and regulation s as may be nec essary a nd proper to carry out th e purposes of the Inte gra te d Ba r 8S well as the provisions of this
Rul e.
SEC. 9. Membership dues . - Every member of t he Integrated sh all pay such a nn ua l dues as the Board of Governors
sha ll determ ine with the a pproval of the Supreme Court. A
fixed s um equivalent to ten percent (10% ) of the collections
from each Cha pte r sha ll be se t aside a s a Wel fare Fu nd for
disabled me mbers of t he Chapter and the compulsory heirs of
dece ased members th ereof.
242
AI'PEN DIX
~ I-.: .
243
cgutc s or Gover nor and no nation al or local officer or committee member shall receive a ny com pe nsation, a llowa nce or
e molument from t he fund s of t he Inte gr a te d Bar for any service rendered the rein or be e ntitl ed to reim bursement for a ny
expense incurred in the disch a rge of his functions.
SEC . 15. Fiscal matters . - The Hoard of Governors shall
admi nister the fu nds of the Integra te d Bar and sha ll have the
power to ma ke ap propriatio ns a nd disbursemen ts t herefrom.
It shall cause proper Books of Accoun ts to be kept an d Fina ncia l Statements to be rendered and shal l see to it tha t the
proper a udit is ma de of all accou nts of the Integrated Bar a nd
a ll rhe Chapters t he reof
SEC. 16. J ournal . - The Board of Gove rnors sha ll cause
to be publish ed a quarterly .Journal of the Integrated Bar, free
copies of which sha ll be distributed to every member of the
Inte grated Bar.
SEC. 17. Volunta ry B a r association s . - All voluntary
Bar associa tions now existing or wh ich may herea fter be formed
may co-exist with the Inte gra ted Bar but sha ll not operate at
cros s-purposes therewith .
SEC. 18. A mendments . - This Rul e may be am end ed by
the Supreme Court motu proprio or upon the recom mendation
of th e Board of Governors or any Chapter of the Integra ted
Bar.
REC, 19. Organizational period . - The Commiss ion on
Dar Inte gration sha ll organize the local Chapters a nd toward
thi s end sha ll sec ure the assistance of the Department of Justice an d of all Judges throughout the Philippi ne s. All Cha pter
o rganizationa l meetings sh all be held on Saturday, February
17, 1973. In every case, the Comm ission shall cause proper
notice of the date, time and place of the meeting to be served
upon all the lawyers concerned at the ir a dd ress es a ppearing in
the record s of the Commission. Th e la wyers present at the
meeting called to orga nize u Chapter shall constitute a qu orum
for t he purpose, including the election ofa President, Vice P resident, a Secretary, a Treasurer, a nd five Directors.
The Commission shall initia lly fix the number of Delogute s and a pportion th o same among a ll till' Chapters Ill'
244
nea rly as may be in proportion to the number of their re specti ve members, but ea ch cha pte r ahall ha ve at least one Delegate. The President of eac h Chapte r shall corv-urrently be its
Delegate to th e H OU R(! of Delegate s. The Vice Pre side nt shall
be his alte rna te , except where th e Chapte r is enti tled to have
more than one Delegate , in which case t he Vice President
shall also be 8 Delega te . The Board of Di rectors of the Chapter shall in proper cases elect additional as well as al te rna te
Delegates.
The House of Delegates sha ll convene in the City of
Manila on Saturd ay, March 17, 1973 for t he purpose of electing a Board of Governors . The Governors shall immed iately
ass ume office a nd forthwith meet to elect th e Officers of the
Integrated Bar. The Officers so chosen shall immediately ass ume th eir respective positions.
SEC. 20. Effecti vity . J anuary 16, 1973.
I
APP ENDIX " F"
RULE 139B
DISBARMENT AND DISCIPLIN E
OF ATTORNEYS
SECTION 1. How l nstituted . - Proceedings for the di sbarment, suspensi on, or disciplin e of attorneys may be taken
by th e Supreme Court motu p roprio, or by the In tegrated Ba r
of the Ph ilippines (lBP) upon the verified complaint of a ny
person . The complaint sha ll sta te clea rly a nd concisely th e
facts compl ain ed of and sha ll be s upported by affidavits of
pers ons havin g personal kn owledge of the facts th erein alleged a nd/or by such documents as may substant iate said facta.
The IBP Board of Governo rs may, m otu proprio or upon
referral by th e Supreme Cou rt or by a Ch a pter Board of Officers, or at th e instance of any person, initiate a nd prosecute
pro per cha rges against e, ring at to r neys including th ose in the
govern ment service; Prouide d; however, That all charges against
Justices of th e Court of Appeals a nd th e S a ndiga nbayan. and
Judges of the Court of Tax Appeals a nd lower courts, even if
la wyers are jointly charged with t he m, sh a ll be filed with the
Su preme Court; Provided, fu rther, That ch arges filed aga inst
Jus tices a nd Judges before the IBP, including th ose filed pri or
to their appointm ent in the Judicia ry, shall immediately be
forwarded to th e Supreme Court for disposition a nd adjudication.
Six (6) copies of th e verified comp lain t shall be filed with
the Secretary of the IBP or the Secretary of any ofits cha pte rs
who shall forthwith t ra nsmit the sa me to th e IBP Board of
Governors for assignment to a n inv estigato r. (As amended.
Bar Matter No . 1960. M ay 2. 2000.)
245
APPENDIX "1':l46
247
Lfo;GAL PKOFfo;SSION
248
In vesti gato r. Such bea ri ng s sha ll a s fa r as practicable be terminated wit hin fifte en (15) d a ys fro m its commencement . Th erea fte r, the IBP Board of Governors sha ll wit hi n a like period of
SEC. 9. Dep ositions, - Depositions may be taken in acco r da nce with th e Rul es of Co urt wit h le a ve of t he
Investi ga torta).
Wit hi n t he P hilippines, depositions may be take n befo re
a ny me mber of the Board of Governors, the President of any
Chapter, or a ny officer a u t horized by law to administe r oaths .
249
n :GAL PROJo'ESSI ON
250
save that the review of the re port of investi gat ion shall be
cond ucte d di rectly by the S upreme Court.
SE C. 14. Report of t he Solicit or General or other Court
designa ted In vest igat or. - Based upon the evidence add uced
a t the investiga tio n, the Solicito r Ge ne ra l or other Investigator design ated by the Supreme Court sha ll submit to the
Su preme Cou rt a report containing his findings of fact and
recommendations togethe r with th e record and a ll the evidences presen ted in th e in vesti gation for th e final acti on of
the Supreme Court.
C. COMMON P RO VISIONS
SE C. 15. Suspension of a ttorney by S upreme Court. Afte r receipt of respond ent's a nswe r or la pse of the peri od
therefore , the S upreme Court, m otu proprio, or at the instance
of t he IBP Board of Govern ors upon the recommendation of
the Investigators , may sus pend a n a ttorney from the pract ice
of his profession for a ny of the ca uses specified in Rule 138,
Section 27, during the pende ncy of the investigation until such
sus pens ion is lifted by the Supreme Court.
API' ENDIX
~I--
251
SEC . 18. Confidentiality . - P roceed ings agains t attorney s shall be private and confidential. However, the fina l order
of the Supreme Court s ha ll be pu blished like its decision s in
ot he r cases.
SEC. 19. Expenses . - All reasonable and nec es aa ry expen ses incurrod in relation to disciplinary a nd di sbarment
procee dings a re la wful charges for whic h the parties may be
taxed as costs .
SE C. 20. Effectiv ity and Tra nsitory Provision. - Thi s
Rule sha ll take effect on J une 1, 1988 and sha ll s u persed e the
present Ru le 139 enti tled "DISBARMENT OR SUSPENSION
OF ATI'ORNEYS: All cases pen ding investigation by the Office
of the Solicitor Genera l sha ll be tr ansferred to the Inte gra ted
Ba r of the Philippines Board of Gove rn ors for investigation
and d ispositi on as provided in this Ru le except those cases
where the inve stigation ha s been su bstantially com pleted. (Bar
Matter N o. 35 6, Resolution A pril 13, 1988)
Rule 139 .
APPENDIX
'G~
2a:~
APPENDIX "G"
REPUBLIC ACT NO. 7662
AN ACT PROVIDING FOR R EF O RMS IN LEGAL EDU
CAT ION, C REATING FOR THE PURPOSE ALE
GAL ED UCATION BOARD, AND FOn OTHER PUIlPOSES
3)
1)
to impa rt a mong law stude nts a broad knowled ge of law an d its various fields , a nd of legal insti tution s ;
2)
3) to prep are la w students (or ad vocacy, counseling, problem -solvin g a nd decision -mak ing. a nd develop
their a bility to deal with recognized legal problems of th e
present a nd the fut ure;
4) to develop competence in a ny fiel d of law as is
necessa ry for ga inful employment or sufficie nt 8S a founda tion for future tra ining beyond the ba sic professional
degree , and to develop in th em the desire a nd ca pacity
for continuing study a nd sell-im provement ;
5 ) to inculcate in t hem the ethics and r ospo nsibili ties of the legal profession; a nd
6 ) to prod uce la wyers who conscienti ously pursue the lofty goals of their profession and fait hfully adhere 10 its et hical norm a.
S J<: C. 4. IA!gu l Educatio Board; Creation. and C() mp osition. - 10 ca rry out the pu rposes of thi8 Act, there is here by
created th e Lega l Edu cation Boa rd, herei nafter referred to as
U :GAL PROFl':SSION
APrl:.NlllX C
the Board , attache d solely for budgeta ry pur poses a nd ndministrati ve support to the De partment of Education , C u lture and
S po rts.
254
25:.
I
U;GAI. I'RfW f<:S ."lION
API'I::-mrx ~G ~
256
11:
SEC.
Legal Education Fund . - Th ere is hereby crea ted a special en do wment fund , to be known as the Legal
Ed ucati on Fund, wh ich s hall be under t he control of t he Board,
and administered as a se pa ra te fund by the Soci al Security
System (SSS) wh ich s hall in vest th e sa me with d ue and pruden t regard to its so lvency, s afety a nd liquid ity.
The Le gal Ed ucat io n Fund s h a ll he establ is he d out of,
an d maintained from , the amou nts a pp ropria ted pu rsu ant to
paragra ph 2, Section 13 hereof, lind from s ixty percent (60%)
of t he privi lege tax pa id by every lawyer effecti ve Fiscal Year
2m
U :GAL
~"
I'ROFESSIO~
SEC. 15. Repealing Clause. - All laws, decrees , execu tive orders, r-ules a nd regulation s, issuances or parts thereof
inconsis te nt with th is Act are hereby repea led or amended
accordingly.
SE C. 16. Effectivity . - Th is Act shall ta ke effect after
fifteen (1 5 ) days following the com ple tion of its publication in
t he Official Gazzelte or in any two (2) news papers of ge neral
APPENDIX "H"
SUPREME COURT RESOLUTION
circulation.
JU D i;
App rov ed ,
(Sgd.) EDGARDO J . AN GARA
Preside nt
{If II/('
Selwtf'
Secretary General
l louee of Representa ti ves
13, 1997
Gentl eme n:
Quot ed hereunder, for your infonnation, is a resolution
of the Cou rt En Bane dated Jun e 10 . 1997 .
260
A I'I'E:~ OIX
tha t
11
la w s tudent a p peari ng
before the tri a l court unde r Ru le J3BA should Ill' acco mpeni ed by a supervising lawye r. On the otherhand , UP-OI .A.,
th rough its Director, Atty. Alfredo F. Tadinr, s ubmit s t hat "t he
matter of all owing a la w intern to uppear un accompan ied by
a duly accredited s u pe rv is ing la wye r s hould be . . . left to the
'61
3.
to ensure cons iste ncy with the fund a menta l pri nciple that no per-sen is allow ed to pra ct .i co a particul ar professian withou t posses sing th e qualifications, particu larly a license, as required by law.
-tr-
I
I
court of
11 justice
2. 2
IN VIEW WHEREOF, we hold that a la w stude nt a ppearing before the Regional Trial Court under the a uthori ty of
Rul e 138-A mu st be made under the d irect control a nd su pervis ion of a member of the Integrated Bar of the Philippines
duly accre d ite d by the law sch ool a n d that said la w student
must be accompanied by a supe rvising lawyer in all his appearances.
Padilla an d Francisco, JJ., on leave.