Mystery from the Depths of Time

by Pierre Stromberg and Paul Heinrich

[Last Update: May 31, 2000]

Introduction
Creationists have often been criticized for failing to present original research and
evidence that would overthrow our contemporary view of human origins in favor of
another. However, this is not an entirely fair accusation. The creation "science" field
known as OOPARTS, or "Out Of Place ARTifactS" is a lively area of study with
numerous examples. This paper will examine the most popular and least understood
specimen, the Coso Artifact.

The Discovery
The story of the Coso
Artifact has been
embellished over the
years, but nearly all
accounts of the actual
discovery are basically
unchanged.
On February 13, 1961,
Wallace Lane, Virginia
Maxey, and Mike
Mikesell were seeking
interesting mineral
specimens, particularly
geodes, for their "LM
& V Rockhounds Gem and Gift Shop" in Olancha, California. On this particular day,
the trio were about six miles northeast of Olancha, near the top of a peak about 4,300
feet in elevation and about 340 feet above the dry bed of Owens Lake. According to
Maxey, "We hiked about three miles north, after we had parked some five miles east of
State Highway 395, south of Olancha, California." At lunchtime, after collecting rocks
most of the morning, all three placed their specimens in the rock sack Mikesell was
carrying.
The next day in the gift shop's workroom, Mikesell ruined a nearly new diamond saw
blade while cutting what he thought was a geode. Inside the nodule that was cut,
Mikesell did not find a cavity as so many geodes have, but a perfectly circular section of
very hard, white material that appeared to be porcelain. In the center of the porcelain

cylinder, was a 2-millimeter shaft of bright metal. The metal shaft responded to a
magnet.
There were still other odd qualities about the specimen. The outer layer of the specimen
was encrusted with fossil shells and their fragments. In addition to shells, the
discoverers noticed two nonmagnetic metallic metal objects in the crust, resembling a
nail and a washer. Stranger still, the inner layer was hexagonal and seemed to form a
casing around the hard porcelain cylinder. Within the inner layer, a layer of
decomposing copper surrounded the porcelain cylinder.

The Initial Investigations

Very little is known about the initial physical
inspections of the artifact. According to discoverer
Virginia Maxey, a geologist she spoke with who
examined the fossil shells encrusting the specimen
said the nodule had taken at least 500,000 years to
attain its present form. However, the identity of the
first geologist is still a mystery, and his findings were
never officially published.
Another investigation was conducted by creationist
Ron Calais. Calais is the only other individual known
to have physically inspected the artifact, and was
allowed to take photographs of the nodule in both X
ray and natural light. Calais's X rays brought interest
in the artifact to a new level. The X ray of the upper end of the object seemed to reveal
some sort of tiny spring or helix. INFO Journal Publisher Ronald J. Willis speculated
that it could actually be "the remains of a corroded piece of metal with threads." The
other half of the artifact revealed a sheath of metal, presumably copper, covering the
porcelain cylinder.

The Artifact: Where Is It Now?

The last known individual to possess the Coso Artifact was one of the original
discoverers, Wallace Lane. According to the Spring 1969 issue of INFO Journal, Lane
was the last known person to possess the object. It was on display in his home, but he
adamantly refused to allow anyone to examine it. However, he had a standing offer to
sell it for $25,000. In September 1999, a national search was attempted to locate any of
the original discoverers, but the attempt was fruitless. The authors of this article suspect
that Wallace Lane is dead, and the location of the artifact is unknown, possibly
destroyed. Virginia Maxey is alive, but is avoiding any public comment. The
whereabouts of Mike Mikesell are still unknown.

Fantastic Speculations
Ever since the artifact was first discovered, numerous individuals have speculated about
its mysterious origin and possible use.

Virginia Maxey speculated that "one possibility is that it is barely 100 years old something that lay in a mud bed, then got baked and hardened by the sun in a matter of
a few years." However it was Maxey who supplied the claim that the artifact could be at
least 500,000 years old. "Or else it is an instrument as old as legendary Mu or Atlantis.
Perhaps it is a communications device or some sort of directional finder or some
instrument made to utilize power principles we know nothing about."
INFO Journal editor Paul J. Willis speculated that the artifact was some sort of spark
plug. His brother found the suggestion extraordinary. "I was thunderstruck," he wrote,
"for suddenly all the parts seemed to fit. The object sliced in two shows a hexagonal
part, a porcelain or ceramic insulator with a central metallic shaft - the basic
components of any spark plug." However, the two could not reconcile the upper end
featuring a "spring", "helix", or "metal threads" with any contemporary spark plug. So
the mystery continued. The artifact even appeared briefly at the end of an "In Search
Of..." episode hosted by Leonard Nimoy.
The Internet offers a plethora of other opinions on the subject. While most websites
simply report the mystery as described earlier, some have taken to speculate on the
purpose and origin of such a device. Brian Wood, described as "International Director
of MICAP (Multinational Investigations Cooperative on Aerial Phenomena) and
Producer/Director of The Paranet Continuum Radio Program" suggested that if it isn't
simply a spark plug, "My guess would be some sort of antenna. The construction
reminds me of modern attempts at superconductors. Wonder if anyone's tried replicating
the thing using ceramic superconductors and then cooling the thing off with liquid
nitrogen to see what happens." (Source: http://emerald.oz.net/jz/sphinxt.html September
10, 1999).
Joe Held's "Joe's UFOs and Space Mysteries" thinks the device "looks similar to a small
capacitor with several different materials. The object is roughly the size of an auto spark
plug. Since the formation of geodes can take millions of years this was a very curious
find indeed." (Source: http://members.tripod.com/J_Kidd/index.html September 10,
1999).

The Creationists and the Artifact

With such outrageous speculation, individuals familiar with the creation/evolution
controversy would assume that fundamentalist Christians would stay far away from
such artifacts and stories. But this is far from the case. Numerous creationists have been
involved with this artifact since its discovery.
As noted earlier, Ron Calais was involved with the Coso Artifact since its initial
discovery. Calais was the individual responsible for the natural light and X ray
photographs of the artifact. He also brought the Coso Artifact to the attention of the
Charles Fort Society, publisher of INFO Journal, whose 1969 article is the primary
source for information on this object to date. Calais is still a contributor to creationism
and most recently had a paper published in the June 1996 edition of the Creation
Research Society Quarterly ("Slippery Phylogenies: Evolutionary Speculations on the
Origin of Frogs", by Ron Calais and A.W. Mehlert, pp. 44-48.).

Creation Outreach, a Spokane, Washington based creationism ministry promotes the

artifact on their website (source: http://www.ior.com/~kjc/pages/strange.htm September
22, 1999) by reprinting an article by J.R. Jochmans. Jochman's article on the Creation
Outreach's website, originally available through the national Bible-Science Association
concluded, "As a whole, the 'Coso artifact' is now believed to be something more than a
piece of machinery: The carefully shaped ceramic, metallic shaft and copper
components hint at some form of electrical instrument. The closest modern apparatus
that researchers have been able to equate it with is a spark plug. However, there are
certain features - particularly the spring or helix terminal - that does [sic] not correspond
to any known spark plug today." Creation Outreach member Jim Marisch is known to
have lectured in local Spokane public school classrooms, but it is unknown if he
specifically mentioned the artifact in question. Nevertheless, students exposed to
Creation Outreach would inevitably be redirected to their website for further
information.
It should also be noted that according to a letter printed in "Atlantis Arising", J.R.
Jochmans claims to have ghost-written three quarters of the book "Secrets of the Lost
Races" by Rene Noorbergen. "Secrets of the Lost Races" has often been cited as a
reference for the Coso Artifact by young-earth creationists.
Carl Baugh, a young-earth creationist whose claim to fame is the promotion of the
Paluxy River Tracks, notes the Coso Artifact in his online dissertation (source:
http://home.texoma.net/~linesden/cem/diss/diss2.htm October 10, 1999) using material
from Noorbergen's "Secrets of the Lost Races."
Elsewhere in the Pacific Northwest, the Institute for Creation Research has been heavily
promoting the Coso Artifact through its adjunct faculty member, Dr. Donald Chittick.
According to his own literature, Chittick, a Newberg, Oregon resident, holds a Ph.D. in
physical chemistry and has taught at the University of Puget Sound and George Fox
College. Dr. Chittick is also an active lecturer, having traveled in the United State and
Canada for the past 20 years, speaking before students both public and private about
creationism. In 1981, he was one of five "creation scientists" who testified in pretrial
depositions for the Arkansas "Balanced Treatment Act", which required that "creation
science" be taught along with evolutionary biology in that state's public schools. And in
1993, his lecture to public high school students in Stanwood, Washington led to a
community furor, threats from the ACLU, and a subsequent shakeup in the local school
board.
Though he claims to have little to do with the ICR, Dr. Chittick encourages audiences at
his lectures to join the ICR, sells their literature, and signs up interested parties for the
ICR's mailing list. Most recently, Donald Chittick delivered his "Puzzle of Ancient
Man" lecture on March 9, 1999, in Winnipeg, Manitoba. The event was sponsored by
the ICR as part of their "Case for Creation" lecture series. According to the ICR, adjunct
faculty members are "expected to be of high moral character and personal integrity,
firmly committed to the ICR Tenets and Educational Philosophy."
"The Puzzle of Ancient Man" lecture is basically a summary of Chittick's book of the
same title. Like the book, Chittick begins his lecture by presenting the Coso Artifact as
evidence that ancient civilizations were extremely advanced. Presuming that it is an
ancient spark plug, Chittick explains, "A spark plug is evidence of fairly sophisticated

development. Reliable dates for such finds are difficult to obtain. However, it has been
commonly assumed that formation of geodes requires significant amounts of time.
Finding a spark plug in a rock considered to be very old would indeed give it the label
of an out-of-place artifact. Evidence of advanced technology, like spark plugs, should
not, according to evolutionism, be discovered in old rocks."

Problems with the Artifact Story

Creationist and other proponents of the artifact have woven a riveting story. But a
multitude of problems regarding the claims and recent discoveries have cast a much
different picture.

The Geologic
Evidence: Is the Coso
Artifact Encased in a
Geode?
When it comes to the
geologic evidence, the most
stunning claim is that the
artifact was discovered in a
geode. As Donald Chittick
has noted, formation of a
geode requires significant
amounts of time. But what
is often overlooked is that the Coso Artifact possesses no characteristics that would
classify it as a geode. It is true that the original discoverers were looking for geodes on
the day the artifact was found. But this alone is insufficient evidence that the artifact is a
geode.
Geodes consists of a thin outer shell, composed of dense chalcedonic silica, and are
filled with a layer of quartz crystals. The Coso Artifact does not possess either feature.
Discoverer Virginia Maxey referred to the material covering the artifact as "hardened
clay" and noted that it had picked up a miscellaneous collection of pebbles, including a
"nail and washer." Analysis of the surface material is noted as having a hardness of
Mohs 3, which is not very hard and certainly much softer than chalcedony.
Other arguments regarding the ancient source of the Coso Artifact focus on the alleged
fossil shells encrusted on the surface. As noted earlier, if a nail and washer were also
found on the surface, the significance of the fossil shells is seriously diminished. Even
creationist literature notes how surface materials can lead to mistaken assumptions
about the true age of individual objects. Creation Ex Nihilo's June-August 1998 issue
features fence wire that had become encased by surface materials including "fossil"
seashells (quotes in the original article).

The Artifact Itself: What Is It?

As noted earlier, numerous individuals have speculated about the apparent purpose of
the Coso Artifact. The most popular suggestion is that it is some sort of spark plug,

designed and manufactured by an advanced civilization eons ago for technological

devices equal to or surpassing our own. But as mentioned earlier, there's no reason to
assume that the artifact was manufactured thousands of years ago. Some have halfheartedly suggested that the device could have been a contemporary spark plug circa
1961. But ancient artifact proponents point to the X ray of the top half, which indicates
some type of tiny spring or helix mechanism. The content of this X ray, they argue, runs
contrary to what we know about contemporary spark plugs.
A clue to what is revealed in the X ray lies in one of the earliest articles about the
artifact. In the Spring 1969 issue of INFO Journal, Ronald Willis suggested that the
upper end of the object "is actually the remains of a corroded piece of metal with
threads." The Willis brothers seriously suspected the object was a contemporary spark
plug, but were still unable to explain what was in the X ray. Spark plugs of the 1960's
era typically terminated with no visible threading and tapered to a dull point.
Though many of the interested parties agreed that the artifact bore a striking
resemblance to a twentieth-century spark plug, no one seems to have considered the
idea of evolution - specifically, spark plug evolution.
In the course of investigating the origins of the Coso Artifact, it was determined that
mining operations were conducted in the area of discovery early in the twentieth
century. This discovery lead to the tantalizing possibility that primitive combustion
engines were used for various purposes in the Coso mountain range. Combustion
engines were a very new technology at this time, and so we extrapolated that spark plug
technology would also have been in its infancy. Even if this assumption were correct,
identification of the spark plug in question would seem to be a daunting task. To help
the authors of this article identify the Coso Artifact, they decided to turn to a littleknown group of experts - The Spark Plug Collectors of America.
Letters were sent to four different spark plug collectors describing the Coso Artifact,
including Ron Calais' X rays of the object in question. Collectors were asked if they
could identify what they saw in the photos. The collectors were expected to provide
some vague hints, or to not be able to identify the artifact at all. Their actual answers
were stunning.
On September 9, 1999, Chad Windham, President of the Spark Plug Collectors of
America called Pierre Stromberg of Pacific Northwest Skeptics. Windham initially
suspected that Stromberg was a fellow spark plug collector, writing incognito, with the
ostensible motive of hoaxing him. His fears were compounded by the fact that there is
an actual line of spark plugs named "Stromberg." Windham had also contacted another
spark plug collector, strongly suspecting that he was the culprit, and made a point of
looking up the website of Pacific Northwest Skeptics to ensure it actually existed.
Though Stromberg repeatedly assured Windham that his intentions were purely for
research, he was puzzled why Windham was so suspicious and asked him to explain.
Windham replied that it was so obvious to him that the artifact was a contemporary
spark plug, the letter had to be a hoax. "I knew what it was the moment I saw the xrays" Windham stated. He also added that it was not uncommon at all for spark plug
collectors to play pranks on one another.

"Are you sure it's a spark plug?" Stromberg asked?

"There's no question about it, " Windham replied, barely containing
his laughter, "it's a spark plug."
Stromberg asked Windham if he could identify the particular make of
the spark plug. Windham replied he was certain that it was a 1920's
era Champion spark plug. Stromberg was stunned by the collector's
certainty, but Windham insisted that he had nailed the identification.
Windham offered to send two identical spark plugs, the only possible
but slight difference being the diameter of the packing nut at the base
of the plug. Stromberg accepted Windham's offer and a few days later a package arrived
in the mail.
Ten days after the phone call with Windham, Pierre Stromberg received a phone call
from Bill Bond, founder of the Spark Plug Collectors of America, and curator of a
private museum of spark plugs containing more than two thousand specimens. Bond
said he hadn't spoken to Windham, but said he thought he knew the identity of the Coso
Artifact, "A 1920s Champion spark plug." Spark plug collector Mike Healy also
concurred with Bond and Windham's assessment about the spark plug. The fourth
collector, Jeff Bartheld, Vice-President of the Spark Plug Collectors of America
contacted Stromberg via postal mail on October 18, 1999, and also confirmed that the
artifact was a 1920s Champion spark plug. To date, there has been no dissent in the
spark plug collector community as to the origins of the Coso Artifact.
Since Chad Windham mentioned that spark plug collectors enjoy pulling pranks on one
another, the question of deliberate fraud inevitably crops up in relation to the Coso
Artifact. However, there is little hard evidence that the original discoverers intended to
deceive anyone from the start. Pacific Northwest Skeptics investigated the Spark Plug
Collectors of America. The group formed in 1975, well after the discovery of the
artifact, and none of the three discoverers was ever affiliated in any way that the
collectors can recall. Windham and Bond insist that while spark plug collectors enjoy
hoaxing one another, they cannot imagine that any of their members would take a prank
this far.

Comparisons and Analysis

On September 14, 1999, Stromberg received a package from Chad Windham. Inside the
package were the two spark plugs Windham had promised along with an analysis of the
specimens. Windham writes,
I am enclosing two spark plugs made by Champion Spark Plug company circa - 1920's.
Plug #1 is 7/8" - 18 thread. I have loosely assembled the plug, and chipped the "brass
hat" off to show the configuration of it and the porcelain under it. Plug #2 is 1/2" NPT of same design.
The diameter of the porcelain on Plug #1 is slightly less than 3/4" - close to the
dimension in your letter. As you can see the base and packing nut which hold the
porcelain, are sealed with a copper and asbestos gasket. This corresponds with the

article. The center electrode of plugs were made of special alloys which may support
"...cut in two in 1961 but five years afterwards had no tarnishing visible."
The sketches included clearly show one rib on the upper end of the porcelain, although
Champion used two ribs in this era - probably just an artist's error. The "top hat
matches those of "plug 1 and 2."
As for the outer shell, it obviously decayed - probably from salt water (or other
corrosive substance) and the outer crust is merely some sort of deposit like sea shells or
other deposits collected on the deteriorating surfaces of the spark plug base.
There is _NO_ doubt that this is merely an old spark plug. Most probably, it is a
Champion spark plug, similar to the two enclosed.
Windham's letter did indeed match a careful analysis
of the specimens. Most striking is the brass "top hat"
that has so vexed previous attempts to provide a
rational explanation for the artifact. But the
similarities are more than skin deep. Because
Windham had chipped the brass top hat off specimen
#1, the spark plug revealed a metal shaft terminating
in a flared end, presumably to help secure the top hat
to the plug's porcelain cylinder. This revelation led to
speculation that such a flared tip could also be visible
in the original X ray of the brass hat. And indeed, as
shown at left, the flared end of the metal shaft also
appears in the Coso Artifact. The shaft in the X ray,
just below the flare, also reveals deterioration until it
meets the porcelain cylinder. This, too, is exactly what we would expect if the artifact is
a 1920s-era Champion spark plug. An X ray of the authors' own disassembled specimen
reveals a picture very similar to the original X ray of the Coso Artifact. As with the
original artifact, the central metal shaft of both specimens responds to
a magnet.
Proponents of fantastic stories regarding the artifact have made
mention of mysterious copper rings that encase the porcelain. But this
too can be easily explained. Specimen #1 provided by Chad Windham
was completely disassembled, revealing a pair of copper rings
sandwiching an asbestos lining (right). According to Windham, this
design was necessary because porcelain and steel have vastly differing
expansion rates, so the copper was used for compensation purposes.
Specimen #2 was not disassembled by Windham, but also presented a
feature that could explain why the artifact had not been identified
decades ago. Specimen #2, though suffering from severe tarnish, came with a top nut
screwed into its top hat. Almost all Champion spark plug advertisements of the first half
of the twentieth century showed pictures of their spark plugs including the top nut
already screwed into place. In some cases, the top nut comes in two forms, one of which
closely mimics the tip of today's contemporary spark plugs, which have no threading

whatsoever. So it becomes rather easy to understand why the appearance of threads in

the Coso Artifact seemed so puzzling to the original investigators.
Spark plug collectors are quite familiar with spark plugs that have been found in
unusual places. The Summer 1998 issue of "The Igniter," published by the Spark Plug
Collectors of America, features such an item on page 20. Collector Joe Cook recounted,
"Once while scuba diving, a friend of mine made a rare discovery with his underwater
metal detector. It looks like a ball of barnacles and shells, but has a spark plug top
sticking out of it. Apparently this plug has been under water for quite some time! He
asked me if I still collected plugs. I said yes and then he asked me if I ever heard of a
'King Neptune' special. I said no and headed for the 'Master list' to look it up. When I
couldn't find a 'King Neptune' special he began to laugh and handed me the barnacle
covered plug and he said 'bet you don't have one like this.' He was right!"
It should be noted that the
corrosion of the Coso Artifact
almost completely destroyed
any of the iron-alloy-based
components, with the exception
of the metal shaft encased in the
porcelain cylinder. The samples
received from Chad Windham
also revealed corrosion of the
iron-based components, but the
brass top hats were unscathed,
with the exception of some
tarnishing. If the Coso Artifact
is indeed a 1920s-era Champion
spark plug, the X ray of an
almost perfectly preserved top hat is exactly what one would expect. Brass, a copperzinc alloy is commonly engineered to resist corrosion far better than iron-based alloys.
In harsh environments, copper tends to outlast iron, but still succumbs fairly quickly.
The rates of decay in the Coso Artifact match the rates of decay one would see in a
1920's era Champion spark plug. For an excellent review of how ferrous and nonferrous alloys decay over time, please see "The Elements of Archaeological
Conservation" by J.M. Cronyn. This article includes numerous photographs, including
X rays, of contemporary objects that have completely decayed into oxide nodules. Like
the Coso Artifact, these examples also feature empty cavities where the original
materials once resided. Examples include X rays of a nodule containing the perfectly
preserved shape of a bolt, plating on a padlock (including its internal workings), and a
belt buckle.
The formation of the iron oxide nodule likely was hastened by the fact that corrosive
"mineral dust" is blown off of the dry lake bed of Lake Owen and onto the surrounding
uplands where the artifact was discovered. Salts created by the evaporation of the lake
water is regularly blown off of the lake bed by local windstorms. The U.S. Geological
Survey has conducted extensive investigations of this phenomena (Source
http://geochange.er.usgs.gov/sw/impacts/geology/owens/ May 31, 2000).

Finally, as noted earlier, the last known individual in possession of the artifact was
Wallace Lane, who was offering it for sale for $25,000. Bill Bond, a spark plug museum
curator was asked how much a 1920s-era Champion spark plug would be worth today.
His answer was, "A couple o' bucks. Max."

Reaction from the Paranormal Community

During the course of research, the authors of this paper asked Dr. Chittick why he felt
the Coso Artifact was an object worthy of presentation to the public. Dr. Chittick was
specifically asked how he reconciled a previous age estimate of 500,000 years with his
young-earth creationist beliefs. On September 29, 1999 Chittick responded:
The article's speculation that it had taken at least 500,000 years to attain the present
form is just that: speculation. Actual petrification of such objects proceeds normally
quite rapidly, as is illustrated by several other similar formations. See for instance, the
note about the petrified miner's hat on the back cover of Creation Ex Nihilo (Vol. 17,
No. 3) for June-August, 1995. See also an article about another "fossil" spark plug in
Creation Ex Nihilo (Vol. 21, No. 4) for September-November, 1999 on page 6.
You asked what I thought about its age. My best guess is that it is probably early postFlood. I have not yet been able to obtain sufficient documentation, so I don't say much
publicly. However, there is evidence that they did in fact perhaps have internal
combustion engines or even jet engines way back then.
Dr. Chittick's revelation that he was already aware of "fossil" spark plugs was startling.
Dr. Chittick was asked in a follow-up letter about how he can positively date the Coso
Artifact to the Great Flood since he was already aware of contemporary spark plugs that
appear to be fossilized. In his response on October 23, 1999, he commented:
It has not been my privilege to personally examine the Coso artifact or location and
strata where it was found. There are two reasons I considered the artifact significant.
1. It obviously is a man-made item.
2. Those who evaluated the strata said that it appeared to be old, not modern strata.
Those two items are the principle basis for my conclusion that it was worth study.
Certainly it does merit further study in my judgment. Numerous items like that abound,
but I haven't been able to document them as thoroughly as I would like, and so I don't
say too much about them.
As noted earlier, the alleged strata where the Coso Artifact was found is unknown since
all three discoverers had separately searched for geodes all morning before
consolidating their collections in a single sack. Even if the exact location was
discovered, the artifact was an oxide nodule freely laying on the surface, so the strata
where the item was discovered is irrelevant.
Once the investigation revealed beyond a reasonable doubt the true origins of the
artifact, Dr. Chittick was informed by Pierre Stromberg via postal mail. Dr. Chittick was
warned about the publication of this paper, and was urged to issue a preemptive
retraction as well as paste a disclaimer in his book detailing the Coso Artifact story as

fallacious. Dr. Chittick never responded and may be still promoting a 1920s-era
Champion spark plug as evidence of advanced technology of the ancient past.
Ken Clark of Spokane's Creation Outreach at first expressed interest in the new
discoveries. But when he learned that the true identity was a 1920s-era Champion spark
plug and was offered detailed proof, he no longer communicated with the authors of this
article. As of May 7, 2000, Creation Outreach continues to promote the spark plug on
their website as evidence of a technologically advanced ancient civilization.

Conclusion
The Coso Artifact is a remarkable example
of how creation "science" fails when the
assumptions of its theory are implemented in
a real life archaeological situation. Youngearth creationists commonly assume that
almost all sedimentary layers were deposited
during the Great Flood. Therefore, any items
closely associated with such strata must date
back to the time of Noah.
Perhaps the most surprising revelation is the stunningly poor research Dr. Chittick
conducted regarding the artifact. Several times he referenced creationist articles that
should have cast the original claims in extreme doubt. But somehow, he continued to be
fascinated by the artifact. Anti-creationists familiar with Dr. Chittick will remember a
previous incident with Dr. Chittick. When confronted about his fallacious statements by
Jim Lippard regarding Lucy's knee joint in the mid 1990s, he ignored these warnings
and continued to mislead his audiences until confronted in person by Pierre Stromberg
at the conclusion of a lecture in Seattle. It is possible that Dr. Chittick could be still
promoting the Coso Artifact both in lectures and in his book without acknowledging
any of his private conversations with the authors of this article.
The Coso Artifact was indeed a remarkable device. It was a 1920s-era Champion spark
plug that likely powered a Ford Model T or Model A engine, modified to possibly serve
mining operations in the Coso mountain range of California. To suggest that it was a
device belonging to an advanced ancient civilization of the past could be interpreted as
true, but is an exaggeration of several thousand years.

Acknowledgments
This paper would not have been possible without the gracious help from the following
individuals:
Chad Windham, Bill Bond, Mike Healy, Jeff Bartheld, Arnie Voigt, Dr. David Q. King,
Ken Atkins, Gary L. Bennett, Dr. Alan Bowes, Linda Safarli, Casey Doyle, Paul Cook,
and Ross Langerak.

References
Willis, Ronald J. 1969 (Spring). The Coso Artifact. The INFO Journal 1(4): 4-13.

Cook, Joe. 1998 (Summer). Where Did You Get That? The Igniter 23(3): 20.
Steiger, Brad. 1974. Mysteries of Time and Space. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.
Anonymous. 1998 (March-May). Bell-ieve It: Rapid rock formation rings true. Creation
20(2): 6.
Anonymous. 1991 (December-February). Fossil pliers show rock doesn't need millions
of years to form! Creation 14(1): 20
Anonymous. 1998 (June-August). Fascinating Fossil Fence-Wire. Creation 20(3)
Noorbergen, Rene. 1977. Secrets of the Lost Races. Bobs-Merrill Company.
Steiger, Brad. 1979 (March 4). Were Ancient Scientists Really Tuned to Today?
Parade. 9-10
Cronyn, J. M. 1990. The Elements of Archaeological Conservation. Routledge, London.
Anonymous. 1999 (September-November). Sparking interest in rapid rocks. A 'sparkplug fossil' has lessons for long-agers. Creation 21(4). 6.
Chittick, Donald E. 1997. The Puzzle of Ancient Man. Precision Graphics, Oregon.

Interesting Links
Joe's UFO and Space Mysteries
http://members.tripod.com/J_Kidd/index.html
Paradigm Systems
http://paradigm-sys.com/ae/lib/archeo/nf-electric.html
Phillip Krapf and the Verdants
http://www.gloryroad.net/~bigjim/Phil_Krapf_Verdants.htm
Creation Outreach, Spokane, Washington
http://www.ior.com/~kjc/pages/strange.htm
Carl Baugh's dissertation mentions the Coso Artifact
http://home.texoma.net/~linesden/cem/diss/diss2.htm
Whatif?
http://byerly.org/whatif.htm
Out Of Place Artifacts (includes x-rays of the Coso Artifact)
http://www.eprf.tzo.com/html/spark_plug.html
Times Past
http://www.farshore.force9.co.uk/tp_relic.htm

Legion's Laire
http://www.geocities.com/SouthBeach/5994/page2.html
Paranet
http://www.mm2000.nu/sphinxt.html
UFOLogia
http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Nebula/3703/update17.html
An account regarding Carl Baugh's OOPARTS Hammer
http://members.aol.com/paluxy2/hammer.htm
How a spark plug works
http://www.centuryperformance.com/spark.htm
Federal Mogul - the current parent company of Champion Spark Plugs
http://www.federalmogul.com/
A brief synopsis of Champion's corporate history
http://www.championaviation.com/history.htm
Search Ebay and witness the popularity of spark plug collecting
http://search.ebay.com/search/search.dll?MfcISAPICommand=GetResult&HT=1&Sort
Property=MetaEndSort&QUERY=%22Champion+Spark+Plug%22
Joseph Robert Jochmans comments on his participation in Mr. Noorbergen's work
http://atlantisrising.com/issue7/ar7eters.html
Donald Chittick's pretrial deposition for the Arkansas Balanced Treatment Act
http://www.aracnet.com/~atheism/writ/berra.htm
Paul Heinrich's home page
http://www.intersurf.com/~heinrich/
Pierre Stromberg's home page
http://www.eskimo.com/~pierres/
Donald Chittick's Creation Compass website
http://sites.onlinemac.com/creationcompass/
The Pacific Northwest Skeptics "Physical Evidence" web page that generated so much
hype
http://www.eskimo.com/~pierres/coso/cosopreview.html

Other Contacts
For more information on spark plug collecting and how to join the SPCA, please
contact:

Chad Windham
Spark Plug Collectors of America
3401 N.E. Riverside
Pendleton, OR 97801-3431

About the Authors

Pierre Stromberg is the founder of Pacific Northwest Skeptics and has been fascinated
by origins research ever since he saw PBS Nova's destructive expose of Erich Von
Daniken's "Chariots of the Gods?" decades ago. Since then, he has encouraged a
grassroots movement to combat creationism in the Pacific Northwest. When he isn't
battling creationists, Pierre enjoys hearing stories about local hauntings, alien
abductions, and UFO sightings. Pierre Stromberg has a B.S. (Manhattan College) in
Computer Science and is currently employed as a software quality assurance manager in
Redmond, Washington.
Paul V. Heinrich is a geologist and Research Associate at Louisiana State University.
He has a B.S. (Louisiana State Univ.) and M.S. (Univ. of Illinois) in geology and over
13 years experience as a geologist. His work experience includes years of research in
Quaternary geology, geologic mapping, and archaeological geology. He is a registered
professional geologist in Tennessee (#1373) and Arkansas (#1710). He has been
interested in the "Wildside of Geoarchaeology" since watching the "Mysterious Origins
of Man" in 1996.