Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Teachers Resource
David Sang
Cambridge IGCSE
Sociology
PL
Teachers Resource
Jonathan Blundell
David Sang
SA
Cambridge IGCSE
Introduction
The resources on this Teachers CD-ROM have been written to help students studying the Cambridge IGCSE
Sociology syllabus from Cambridge International Examinations. The materials are designed to support the
Cambridge IGCSE Sociology Coursebook.
The CD is intended to be a practical guide, an equally useful tool for:
teachers who will be teaching to this level for the first time
teachers who are not Sociology specialists but who have been asked to take on the teaching of this subject.
to gain a full understanding of the syllabus in terms of its content, what will be assessed, what format the assessment will
take, the depth of knowledge which students will require and the skills which they need to develop
by providing practical suggestions regarding resources, schemes of work, teaching strategies and student activities.
a range of teaching ideas centred around research, presentations, discussions and debates, pair and group work and
written work
revision notes
practice examination questions in the style of Cambridge Paper 1 and Paper 2 questions with mark schemes and
guidance, written by the author.
SA
M
PL
Introduction
Structuralist approaches focus on large-scale (macro) social structures and institutions rather than
individuals. Interpretivist approaches focus on small-scale (micro) social interactions and look at how
individuals make sense of society and of social actions.
2 Encourage different styles of learning by allowing students to show ideas in a visual way. Key ideas include: the
difference in emphasis on society and social structures and on individuals, and on the macro and micro levels
of social interaction. Allow some written explanation but keep this to a minimum. Possible examples: mind
map, flow chart or diagram, using found images (e.g. from magazines or the internet), using photographs
taken for this work.
1
For Marxists, societies are divided by social class, with higher classes exploiting lower classes. Marxists want
to change society by abolishing class divisions and thus the exploitation of one class by another. Feminists are
concerned with how males have greater power than females and want the two sexes to become equal.
2 a Marxists see the government as acting on behalf of the ruling class (bourgeoisie), ensuring that its power
and wealth are not challenged. Functionalists see the government as representing all sections of society,
finding a consensus based on shared values.
b Marxists see the police force as enforcing laws that benefit the ruling class, arresting and charging
offenders who are working class. Functionalists see the police force as enforcing laws that reflect societys
shared values.
PL
SA
M
Students could make a case for either type of approach; their case should be based on evidence, probably drawn
from their own society.
Sociologists can understand human behaviour and predict how people will behave in particular situations.
We cannot predict the behaviour of a particular individual, but we can predict the behaviour of significant
numbers, e.g. the number of suicides in a year and what types of individuals are most likely to commit suicide.
2 They have a different view of society and of social behaviour. They are interested in small-scale social
interaction and in the meanings people attach to their actions so they favour methods such as participant
observation and unstructured interviews. Positivists, on the other hand, favour experiments, surveys and
structured interviews which provide statistical information.
1
Choice of sampling method and sample will decide the findings of the research. Sampling method or sample
may lead to findings which can be criticised as lacking in validity, reliability or representativeness.
2 Pilot studies are a way of checking before the main research that the research tool (such as a questionnaire) is
fit for purpose and will produce the data required.
1
The student should first introduce themselves, their institution or funding organisation, and the nature and
purpose of the research. The introduction could continue: You are being invited to take part in this research.
Taking part is voluntary. Please read the information carefully so that you can make a decision about whether
to give your informed consent to taking part. You may choose not to answer questions. We will do everything
we can to protect your privacy. Your identity will not be revealed in any publications that result from this
study. The information in the study records will be kept strictly confidential. Individual data will be stored
securely and will be made available only to persons conducting the study. No reference will be made in oral or
written reports that could link you to the study.
Informed consent: whose consent would you need to obtain and how? Teacher, pupils (and/or their parents or
guardians), other adults, such as teaching assistants.
Deception: the researcher should inform everyone of who they are and why they are there.
The researcher may also affect behaviour in the classroom by their presence (the Hawthorne Effect) and this may
have ethical implications.
The researcher may see unacceptable behaviour by pupils and have to decide whether or not to tell the teacher.
The findings may make the teacher question their abilities or competence.
The census is a social survey involving the whole population rather than a sample. There were 23.4 million
households in England and Wales. The first modern British census was in 1801. Questions are asked about
a wide range of aspects of peoples lives, for example who they live with, their work, their qualifications,
their ethnicity and their religion. By law every householder (someone who owns or rents a dwelling and is
responsible for paying bills) has to complete a census form. The punishment for not doing so is a fine of up to
1,000. The information is used by governments and others for a wide range of purposes, including planning
for social changes; for example an increase in the number of births may mean that more classrooms or schools
will be needed in the future. The data from completed forms are published only as statistics. The completed
forms are stored securely for 100 years before being made public.
2 Strengths: gathers information about very large numbers of people, in statistical form which enables councils
and governments to plan. Questions are standardised and data are reliable. Weaknesses: does not give any
information about reasons for changes. Respondents are not asked to give explanations or reasons; e.g. the
census may show that people are having more children, but not why. Not everyone is included in the census;
e.g. homeless people or people who are abroad may be missed out, making the findings less representative.
PL
SA
M
Because the interviewer is able to spend time putting the respondent at ease, e.g. about confidentiality, and
winning their trust. The respondent is more likely to give truthful, honest answers.
2 Focus groups create a group dynamic. The women were from different parts of the UK and would not know
each other. They might have to travel a long distance and would not want to be away from their family. They
might be wary of each other and the discussion might be dominated by one woman, with others feeling unable
to speak up. The researcher would have to work hard to ensure that all the women felt at ease and joined in.
1
The children would be aware that they were being observed, so might not have behaved as they normally
would the Hawthorne Effect.
The children may have been trying to please the observers by doing what they thought they were meant to do.
The experiment seems to have tried to get the intended results by frustrating the children by depriving them of toys.
Because it would involve real people being victims of violence, and it might seem to the children that they
were being encouraged to be violent or to think that violence might be a good thing. These are ethically
unacceptable.
To find out how important teacher expectations of children were in deciding how well children did to
investigate the self-fulfilling prophecy.
2 That there was a self-fulfi lling prophecy. The random selection of children as potential high attainers means
that their success can be attributed to their teachers knowing that they had been identified as such. The way
that the teachers then worked with those pupils must have improved their progress.
3 Some children made more or less progress than they would otherwise have done. The teachers were victims of
a deception and would almost certainly have been distressed when they discovered what had been done.
4 Because it is ethically unacceptable. It is also likely that teachers or parents would sue the researchers for damages.
1
Longitudinal research makes it possible to track changes over time, rather than at a single moment in time,
and to see what factors may have changed peoples lives.
2 They have been involved in sociological research all their lives so will know a lot about the survey, and will
have thought a lot about the issues and data. They may have been influenced by what they have learned
through being involved the Hawthorne Effect.
1
The case study provides detailed information about the people involved at different stages in their lives,
showing change and continuity over time. The participants became committed to the project and were likely
to provide valid information.
2 a Being involved in 7 Up would make people think more about their lives and decisions they made, knowing
that a large television audience would be interested in them. They might therefore make different decisions
than had they not been involved.
b Over time, some participants might decide they did not want to continue. None of the participants has yet
died, but this will inevitably happen at some point.
1
Problems: Venkatesh had a problem getting access; he had to be vouched for by J.T., who acted as a gatekeeper.
The gang may not be representative of other gangs. The behaviour of the gang may have been different
because of his presence (the Hawthorne Effect). We only have Venkateshs account so it is difficult to check
whether his observations are accurate. Advantages: because he was accepted by the gang, Venkatesh was able
to go around with them and to observe their behaviour in different situations. His observations are likely to
have been valid.
2 A covert researcher would spend a lot of time and effort maintaining their cover. It would be very difficult to
make notes, as this would be suspicious. If the covert researcher was discovered, they would be in danger, as
gang members would feel they had been deceived.
SA
M
PL
They had to decide how to record data, e.g. whether to note the length of items, and what to do about news
items that referred to several countries or to developing countries generally; how to describe and analyse the
tone of an item and which non-news programmes to include.
2 To measure tone, the researchers would probably have considered the use of particular words, the angle or
emphasis of the report and the tone of voice used by reporters.
3 Content analysis could also be used for radio broadcasts, newspapers and magazines, and news websites.
1
Structured interviews involve standardised questions with a limited range of answers. They differ from
questionnaires because answers are recorded by the researcher. With unstructured interviews there is no list
of questions, and the interviewer can follow up what the interviewee says.
2 Longitudinal research allows changes over time to be observed. If a panel is used, the involvement of the
sample over a long period is likely to increase the validity of the findings.
3 Practical issues: With participant observation (PO) there are difficulties in access and acceptance; it is
time-consuming and expensive; and it is difficult to make field notes while observing. Non-participant
observation (NPO) does not have these problems to the same extent; acceptance by the group is less of an issue
as the group may not even be aware they are being observed. Ethical issues: Covert PO involves deception and
informed consent will not be possible. With overt research, informed consent may be difficult because of the
size or nature of the group. The researcher must ensure that no harm comes from the groups involvement in
the research; NPO involves fewer risks. Theoretical issues: Representativeness of the group and its behaviour
is an issue with both types of research. PO is not very reliable because it is difficult to repeat, but NPO can
often be repeated. Both are high in validity but this can be limited by the Hawthorne Effect.
4 Encourage creativity, but look for whether the student has seen and made clear the connections between the
different research methods.
1
Students own answer. The case studies in the Coursebook give enough information for students to be able to
make basic points that show their understanding of the concepts.
2 Participant observation and unstructured interviews, as these depend to a large extent on the researcher.
Who the researcher is should make no difference in most experiments and in social surveys; in these, the
participants may not meet or see the researcher.
1
ethical issues, such as whether a method might risk harm to respondents or the researcher
the appropriateness of the method for obtaining the type of data required.
Positivists insist that research should be free of bias, that sociologists should be neutral.
Interpretivists argue that being free of bias is probably not possible, because sociology is about people and their
social lives.
Experiments (the most positivist of methods) can be free of bias in the sense that the researcher can ensure that they do
not themselves affect the outcome.
Other methods in sociology show bias to some extent; for example, in participant observation research the researcher
sometimes develops a strong bond with the group. Interpretivists see this as strength rather than a problem.
PL
SA
M
Graphs
1 UK
2 Sierra Leone
Tables
1 Highest: Italy; lowest: The Gambia
2 The Gambia
Bar charts
1 Tokyo
2 Mumbai
3 Tokyo, Osaka, Los Angeles, New York
Pie charts
1 a Asia and the Pacific; b developed countries
2 The total population of each region, the number of undernourished people in each region.
Quantitative secondary data: official statistics are readily available, often free of charge. Governments have
spent more time and resources collecting these statistics than a sociologist could. They are usually produced
by well-planned research with large samples, but they may be incomplete or inaccurate, and they are social
constructions. They are probably not the exact data the sociologist wants and may be affected by political bias.
Qualitative secondary data such as diaries and personal documents may be high in validity. They offer first-hand
accounts and provide descriptive detail missing in statistical sources. But we often do not know if the accounts
are representative or biased. The usefulness of media depends on factors such as possible bias and selectivity, and
whether there is an accurate representation.
Primary data are data collected by the researcher. Secondary data are data that already exist, having previously
been gathered by an earlier researcher (at which time they were primary data).
2 Encourage students to think about statistics that are meaningful to them, e.g. football league tables, or scores
in computer games, or exam and test results.
3 By asking questions about their origin and context: who wrote this? What do we know about them? What were
their personal circumstances when they wrote this? What was it written for? etc. They can also be compared to
similar sources.
1
To protect the anonymity and confidentiality of the respondents. Note: This might alternatively
be worded along the lines of, so that no one could work out who the women were.
b Types of interview include:
a
Structured
Unstructured
Semi-structured
Group/focus group
Face to face
Telephone
[2]
One mark for each correct type of interview identified (up to a maximum of two)
Answers are expected to give two reasons why sociologists might question generalisations from this
research. They might suggest that;
The sample is too small; the sample was drawn from only one town, which may not be typical of other
towns. The researchers would probably not have known about all the young women who became pregnant
at that age and at that time in that town, and so we cannot know if the sample is representative
One mark for each reason correctly identified (up to a maximum of two)
One mark for development of each reason (up to a maximum of two)
d Answers are expected to give two strengths of group interviews, such as:
SA
M
PL
answers are more likely to be valid, because we form our opinions as members of social groups rather than as
individuals
the interview can bring out what members of the focus group think is important
One mark for each strength correctly identified (up to a maximum of two)
One mark for development of each strength (up to a maximum of two)
e Answers are expected to give two strengths and two limitations of questionnaires, such as:
Strengths:
all respondents answer the same questions with the same answer (the questionnaire is standardised)
reliability/replication
respondents can be geographically distant from researcher (questionnaire can be conducted by post)
Limitations:
Lack of validity
One mark for each strength correctly identified (up to a maximum of two) and one mark for description of
each strength (up to a maximum of two)
One mark for each limitation correctly identified (up to a maximum of two) and one mark for description
of each limitation (up to a maximum of two)
Answers need to demonstrate an understanding of the interpretivist tradition and the preference for
methods that produce qualitative data, for example referring to validity, understanding the point of view of
social actors and the depth and detail of data.
Band 0
No creditworthy response
Band 1 (13)
Answers at this level are likely to show limited understanding and be based on common sense or demonstrate
little in the way of clear sociological knowledge or terminology. At the top of the band answers may begin to
use some appropriate knowledge or terminology.
PL
Band 2 (47)
At the bottom of the band, answers demonstrate basic understanding of the issue and begin to use some
appropriate knowledge and terminology. Supporting explanation may be weak or over simplistic. At the top
of the band, answers use appropriate knowledge and terminology but may not fully focus on the question.
Answers are likely to offer more than one reason.
SA
M
Band 3 (810)
The answer is fully focused on the question. There is evidence of good use of sociological terms and candidates
make clear reference to theoretical issues such as validity. They may also refer to different methods that
produce qualitative data (such as unstructured interviews and participant observation) and may use terms
such as Verstehen or empathy. At the top of the band they should offer a range of reasons why interpretivists
prefer methods that produce qualitative data, as well as demonstrating accurate use of sociological concepts.
g Answers should show an awareness of what is meant by ethical issues and the extent to which they
influence ethical issues (for example, compared to theoretical and practical issues). Ethical issues that could
be discussed include informed consent, deception, anonymity and confidentiality, risk/harm (physical
and psychological) to researcher and to participants. Reference may be made to any sociological research
methods, and examples of research studies raising ethical issues should be credited.
Answers might talk about:
For:
informed consent
deception
codes of practice/guidelines
Against
Theoretical issues such as positivism/interpretivism, types of data, validity, reliability and representativeness
Absence or relative unimportance of ethical issues in some methods (e.g. use of secondary data)
SA
M
PL
Band 4 (1315)
Answers in this band will be clearly focused on the question and address the extent of the importance of
ethical issues. Answers will offer a range of arguments both for and against but this need not be balanced.
They will show excellent grasp of sociological terms and knowledge. At the top of the band there will also be
an evaluative conclusion.
PL
Presentations
SA
M
Written work
PL
Exam-style question: To what extent are practical issues the most important factors when
sociologists are choosing which method to use? (AO1, AO2, AO3)
To help students come to terms with the demands of this type of question, it is a good idea to break the task down
into a series of stages. Allow students first to see the generic mark scheme (provided in the syllabus by Cambridge
International Examinations) and discuss this with them, giving ideas about how they can meet its demands.
Stage 1 students identify relevant material.
Stage 2 students compile two lists, one containing ideas about why practical issues (such as time, money and
access) might be the most important and the other containing ideas about why ethical and theoretical
issues might be more important.
Stage 3 students reach a judgement based on stage 2.
Stage 4 students formulate the argument to be pursued in the answer.
Stage 5 students decide how they will ensure balance in their answers.
Stage 6 students produce a plan containing:
an introduction
a conclusion
brief details of the composition of each of the other paragraphs, showing how they will link together.
SA
M
Make sure that you understand the key terms and can explain them in your own words. Below is a list of key
terms for this unit, with their Coursebook page numbers.
Respondent 20
Response rate 20
Sampling frame 15
Sampling methods
(random/snowballing/quota/
stratified) 16, 17
Secondary data 38
Self-completion questionnaires 20
Semi-structured interview 24
Social survey 19
Structuralism 7
Structured interview 21
Subjectivity 27
Survey population 15
Telephone questionnaires 21
Trend 38
Triangulation 35
Unstructured interview 24
Validity 23
PL
Interviewer effect 27
Laboratory experiments 27
Longitudinal survey 30
Macro/micro approaches 7
Non-participant observation 34
Objectivity 12
Official/non-official statistics 38
Open/closed/pre-coded
questions 20
Overt participant observation 32
Perspectives 9
Pilot study 15
Positivism 12
Postal questionnaires 20
Primary data 38
Qualitative data/research 20
Quantitative data/research 12
Questionnaires 19
Reliability 23
Representativeness 36
SA
M
Bias 12
Case study 29
Causation 8
Comparative study 39
Conflict 9
Consensus 9
Content analysis 34
Correlation 8
Covert participant observation 32
Ethical issues 18
Field experiments 28
Focus group 24
Generalisability 16
Group interview 24
Hawthorne/Observer Effect 28
Historical documents 42
Hypothesis 14
Identity 8
Interpretivism 8
Interviewer bias 27
The main points that you need to cover in your revision are:
Structuralist approaches focus on social structures and institutions and how these influence how people behave;
interpretivist approaches focus more on how individuals make sense of society.
Positivists and interpretivists have different approaches to carrying out research, with positivists preferring a more
scientific and objective approach.
Each stage of the research process involves choices and decisions involving a range of practical, ethical and
theoretical issues.
Sociologists use different types of research methods, including surveys, interviews and participant observation
and experiments.
Other types of research include case studies, longitudinal studies and triangulation.
Sociological methods and their findings can be evaluated in terms of their validity, reliability and representativeness.
Sociologists also use both primary data and a range of secondary data, including official and unofficial statistics,
documents such as diaries and letters, media and published sources.
Validity and reliability: Many students use these terms interchangeably, as if they had the same meaning. It is important
that students understand the difference between the two terms.
Sampling methods: Only four sampling methods are on the syllabus: random, snowballing, quota and stratified. In
wider reading, students may come across others, such as systematic, purposive and cluster sampling. It can be helpful to
know these additional methods but questions will not be asked about them in examination.
Interpretivism: This term is similar in meaning to interactionism; students are now only expected to know the term
interpretivism.
Representativeness and generalisability: Students sometimes do not appreciate the difference between these related
terms. If a sample is representative of a wider population, then generalisations to that wider population can be made
from it.
Strengths and limitations: When a question asks for these, your answer should be as specific as possible. For example,
if a question asks for the strengths or limitations of covert participant observation, credit is unlikely to be given for
points that apply to all participant observation (overt as well as covert). Being cheap and quick as strengths (or time
consuming and expensive as limitations) are not usually good points to make, especially as students tend to apply these
indiscriminately to all methods, without explanation.
SA
M
PL
Sociologists use a range of different terms when discussing the methods used to study society. Draw a line linking
each of the methods below with its correct definition.
the extent to which a method gives consistent
and repeatable results
Interpretivism
Reliability
Positivism
Validity
PL
Generalisability
SA
M
Response rate
Triangulation
Correlation
Sampling frame
Longitudinal survey
Hawthorne/Observer Effect
Pilot study
The missing words each start with the letter given. Sometimes when there is no word beginning with that letter, it
is elsewhere in the word, but the first letter is given to help you.
A
PL
M
(R)
O
P
SA
M
Q
R
(I)
(E)X
(S)Y
(M)
Barker studied a religious sect, the Unification Church, popularly known as Moonies. This Church had received
some bad publicity in the news media, being accused of recruiting students by brainwashing them. The Church
invited Barker, a sociologist of religion, to come and research the Church. They hoped the research report would
reveal that it was not the sinister sect portrayed in the media.
Barker used a variety of different methods to collect as much information as she could about how the Church
was organised and how this affected the day-to-day lives of its members. She lived with a community of Moonies,
sharing in their everyday lives. Although senior Moonies knew who she was, most people assumed she was a
new member; she did not tell them she was not a member. She found that helping with washing up dishes was
a good way of overhearing people talk about life as a Moonie, and after a while she felt able to ask questions.
She interviewed people in depth, and also interviewed some ex-Moonies about why they had left. She used the
interview findings to develop hypotheses which she tried to test in a questionnaire sent to all members of the
Church in the UK; the response rate was high because the Church leaders told members to complete it.
Barker concluded that the Church did not brainwash new members.
What three methods did Barker use?
How was Barker able to gain access to do this research? How could the research have been done if she could
not get access in this way? What problems would there be?
SA
M
PL
Why do you think Barker did not ask questions straight away?
SA
M
PL
The source of information for the case study in the worksheet is:
Barker, E. (1984), The Making of a Moonie, Blackwell, Oxford.
Interpretivism
the view that the social world is very different from the
natural world, and should be studied using non-scientific
methods
Reliability
Generalisability
Validity
Response rate
Triangulation
Correlation
Sampling frame
Longitudinal survey
Hawthorne/Observer Effect
PL
SA
M
Pilot study
Positivism
Worksheet 2
Anonymity
Biased
Covert
Dependent
Ethical (issues)
Focus group
Generalisability
Hypothesis
Interpretivism
Jacobson
Karl
Laboratory
Media (accept mass media or magazines)
Random
Observation
Pilot
Questionnaire
Response rate
Stratified
Telephone
Unstructured
Validity
Interview
Experiment
Systematic
Magazine
Worksheet 3
SA
M
PL
of maintaining a cover. Barker would have had to behave at all times as a believing Moonie. Making notes
without arousing suspicion would have been difficult, as would leaving the research situation.
4 Barker had an initial problem in that the Unification Church invited her to research. She would therefore have
to insist that she be given access to all areas of Moonie life. Without this, her research would be compromised;
she might not be able to give a full account and could be accused of allowing herself to be used by the Moonies
to present a misleadingly positive account. She would also face a problem when carrying out her participant
observation because, living with the Moonies, she would not have access to other ideas and might find herself
going native accepting Moonie ideas and becoming a Moonie herself. Even if this did not happen, she
would, as usually happens in participant observation, become so close to the Moonies that she would see
things from their perspective and so it can be questioned whether her account is unbiased.
5 Because at first she was a stranger, and also she would not know what to ask. After listening in for a while, she
would be able to ask meaningful questions.
c
d
e
f
g
PL
a
b
SA
M
Question 2
Most people conform to the norms of their culture most of the time. When they do not conform, the society
may use formal or informal social control to regulate their behaviour. A wide range of rewards and sanctions
can be applied. Norms can vary between age groups; for example, the behaviour expected of an older person
is not the same as that for a teenager.
What is meant by the term informal social control?
[2]
Describe two sanctions that can be applied to those who break norms in schools.
[4]
c Explain how rewards and sanctions are different in modern industrial societies compared to
traditional societies.
[6]
d Explain why age can be described as socially constructed.
[8]
e To what extent does gender influence social identity?
[15]
Total marks available 35
a
b
Exam practice