Sunteți pe pagina 1din 1

Federal Register / Vol. 72, No.

226 / Monday, November 26, 2007 / Notices 65963

Federal Communications Commission. corporation formed and existing under the Commission’s regulations at 46 CFR
Marlene H. Dortch, the laws of the country of Japan and is 530.8(c).
Secretary. operating as an ocean common carrier. Complainant requests that the
[FR Doc. 07–5843 Filed 11–21–07; 12:47 pm] Complainant asserts that Respondents, Commission: (1) ‘‘Order Respondents to
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
Fashion Accessories Shippers cease and desist from representing the
Association, Inc. (‘‘FASA’’), and Gemini FASA/Gemini operation, as it presently
Shippers Association, Inc. (‘‘Gemini’’) exits, as a shippers’ association’’; (2)
are Delaware non-profit corporations, find the exclusive dealing clause and
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
that Sara Mayes is President of FASA, the royalty clause to be in violation of
Sunshine Act Notices and that Harold Sachs is Executive the Shipping Act and to issue a cease
Director of FASA. Complaint asserts and desist order against Respondents’
AGENCY: Federal Election Commission. that all Respondents are located at 350 future use of such clauses; (3) find that
DATE AND TIME: Tuesday, November 27, Fifth Avenue, Suite 2030, New York, FASA/Gemini’s New York arbitration or
2007 at 10 a.m. New York 10118. any other means for seeking to enforce
Complainant contends that FASA the unlawful exclusive dealing and
PLACE: 999 E Street, NW., Washington,
purports to act as a shippers association royalty clauses is unlawful; and issue a
DC.
and enters into service contracts with cease and desist order against any
STATUS: This meeting will be closed to Respondent pursuing the New York
the public. ocean common carriers as ‘‘Gemini
Shippers Association.’’ Complainant arbitration against ‘‘K’’ Line or re-
ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED: instituting any similar arbitration for
‘‘K’’ Line also contends that it has
Compliance matters pursuant to 2 entered into a number of service enforcement of either of the clauses.
U.S.C. 437g. contracts with Fashion Accessories This proceeding has been assigned to
Audits conducted pursuant to 2 Shippers Association and/or Gemini the Office of Administrative Law Judges.
U.S.C. 437g, § 438(b), and Title 26, Shippers Association since April 2001. Hearing in this matter, if any is held,
U.S.C. Complainant alleges that it makes shall commence within the time
Matters concerning participation in limitations prescribed in 46 CFR 502.61,
‘‘royalty payments’’ by check to Gemini
civil actions or proceedings or and only after consideration has been
Shippers Association pursuant to the
arbitration. given by the parties and the presiding
terms of such service contracts.
Internal personnel rules and officer to the use of alternative forms of
Complainant maintains that under the
procedures or matters affecting a dispute resolution. The hearing shall
service contract ‘‘royalty clause,’’
particular employee. include oral testimony and cross-
Complainant was required to collect
DATE AND TIME: Thursday, November 29, from FASA/Gemini member shippers examination in the discretion of the
2007 at 10 a.m. and forward to Respondent Gemini, the presiding officer only upon proper
PLACE: 999 E Street, NW., Washington, ‘‘Gemini Association dues’’ which showing that there are genuine issues of
DC (Ninth Floor). royalty ranged from $40.00 to $70.00 per material fact that cannot be resolved on
STATUS: This meeting will be open to the container. Complainant ‘‘K’’ Line also
the basis of sworn statements, affidavits,
public. states that it was billed for such depositions, or other documents or that
royalties on the billhead of ‘‘Gemini the nature of the matter in issue is such
ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED:
Shippers Group.’’ Complainant further that an oral hearing and cross-
Correction and approval of minutes. examination are necessary for the
Advisory opinion 2007–22: Jim states that FASA instituted a New York
arbitration claiming royalties it would development of an adequate record.
Hurysz. Pursuant to the further terms of 46 CFR
Management and administrative have received had ‘‘K’’ Line not directly
entered into a service contract with a 502.61, the initial decision of the
matters.
‘‘so-called member’ and a ‘former presiding officer in this proceeding shall
PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION: be issued by November 18, 2008, and
Mr. Robert Biersack, Press Officer, member’ during the 2006–2007 contract
term.’’ the final decision of the Commission
Telephone: (202) 694–1220. shall be issued by March 18, 2009.
Complainant contends that
Mary W. Dove, Respondents are in violation of the Bryant L. VanBrakle,
Secretary of the Commission. Shipping Act of 1984 (‘‘the Shipping Secretary.
[FR Doc. 07–5838 Filed 11–21–07; 10:25 am] Act’’) by: (1) Holding themselves out as [FR Doc. E7–22972 Filed 11–23–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6715–01–M a shippers’ association when it neither BILLING CODE 6730–01–P
organized as a shippers’ association nor
functions as one as defined by the
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION Shipping Act; (2) requiring that ‘‘royalty FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION
payments’’ be made by Complainant to
[Docket No. 07–10] Respondents for the ‘‘privilege of Sunshine Act Meeting
Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd. v. carrying cargoes under the contract
rates,’’ and through such ‘‘royalty AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Federal
Fashion Accessories Shippers Maritime Commission.
Association, Inc.; Gemini Shippers payments,’’ engaging in a scheme to
obtain transportation at less than the TIME AND DATE: November 28, 2007.
Association, Inc.; Sara Mayes; and PLACE: 800 North Capitol Street, NW.,
Harold Sachs; Notice of Filing of otherwise applicable rates; and (3)
implementing and enforcing an First Floor Hearing Room, Washington,
Complaint and Assignment
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES

‘‘exclusive dealing clause’’ that locks DC.


Notice is given that a complaint has shippers into FASA contracts and STATUS: Closed.
been filed with the Federal Maritime controls rate levels. Complainant asserts MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) by that the activities described above are in 1. Port of Los Angeles and Port of
Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd. (‘‘K’’ Line). violation of the 46 U.S.C. 40102(20), Long Beach Proposed Clean Truck
Complainant asserts that it is a (22) and (23), 41102(a), 41104(10), and Program.

VerDate Aug<31>2005 22:03 Nov 23, 2007 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\26NON1.SGM 26NON1

S-ar putea să vă placă și