Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
School of Early Childhood Education, Ryerson University, 350 Victoria Street, Toronto, ON, M5B 2K3 Canada
Faculty of Children and Health, Institute of Education, University of London, 20 Bedford Way, London WC1H 0AL, UK
a r t i c l e i n f o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received 6 December 2007
Received in revised form
3 February 2009
Accepted 17 March 2009
A qualitative analysis of four cooking activities undertaken in two nursery classes reveals relationships
between the adults pedagogical beliefs, the choice and structuring of activities, and the nature of adult
child participation. Four adults each planned and carried out separately, one cooking activity of their
choice with a small group of children, as part of a normal nursery session. The activities were video
recorded and transcribed, and a grounded theory approach was adopted to analyse the adultchild
interactions. Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with the adults which provided insight into
their pedagogical beliefs and rationale for their teaching approaches. Analysis of the data reveals
a dichotomy in the cooking activity choices made by the adults between baking recipes which required
a high level of adult control, and other cooking activities which required minimal adult intervention.
Observations of the cooking activities demonstrate differences in the structure of the activities and the
nature of adultchild participation. The interviews reveal how the teachers pedagogical beliefs and
intentions informed their choice and structure of the cooking activities. This study provides an illustration of the relationship between the adults pedagogical beliefs, activity structure, and the interactions
between the adults and children in one type of activity in a nursery setting. The appropriateness of the
design and feasibility of the observation method is also considered.
Crown Copyright 2009 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Pedagogical beliefs
Activity structure
Adultchild participation
Early childhood education
1. Introduction
The study sought to explore relationships between pedagogical beliefs and intentions, activity choice and structure, and
the nature of adultchild participation in the nursery from
a sociocultural perspective. A series of observations were carried
out to analyse adultchild interactions whilst undertaking
cooking activities in a naturalistic setting of three classrooms in
two state nursery schools in London, UK. The interactions were
categorised, and in conjunction with these interactions, the
structure of the activities was analysed. The teachers were
interviewed to gain insight into their pedagogical beliefs and
intentions for the activities. New ndings are presented that
examine the link between underlying pedagogical beliefs and
intentions, the choice and structure of the activities, and the
interactional roles of adults and children during one type of
activity in nursery settings.
0742-051X/$ see front matter Crown Copyright 2009 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.03.009
1106
5. Aim of study
In this research the relationship among pedagogical beliefs,
choice and structure of the activity, and the nature of adultchild
participation in nursery classrooms was examined. The aim was to
take our current understanding of the link between teachers
beliefs and practices one step further by examining not only what
the teacher did, but what the teacher and child did together. A link
between teachers pedagogical beliefs and their classroom practices
has been established in the literature on teacher education, but
research in teachers beliefs and practices that is based on observations of actual teaching in classrooms rather than hypothetical
tasks and self-reported practices is missing (Fang, 1996). Also, many
of the studies adopting a sociocultural perspective in examining the
processes of adultchild interactions have focused on dyadic
encounters, often in contrived scenarios. There is a need to examine
joint processes of interaction as they occur naturally, and where an
adult is interacting with more than one child. The intention of this
research is to address this need by making authentic observations
in nursery classrooms of adults and small groups of children.
6. Design
This was an observational study of naturally occurring activities
in classrooms in two state nursery schools in a north London
borough, UK. Four sets of data were collected from two nursery
schools. Adults and children were observed and video recorded
during cooking activities undertaken in three nursery classes, and
audio taped interviews were conducted with the adults. The chosen
cooking activities were cake baking, biscuit baking, fruit salad
preparation and sandwich preparation.
1107
Table 1
Summary of participant information.
Adult
Designation
School
Class
A1
A2
A3
A4
Teacher
Head teacher
Teacher
Nursery nurse
X
X
Y
Y
Class
Class
Class
Class
Cooking activity
a
b
c
c
Bake biscuits
Bake cakes
Prepare sandwiches
Prepare fruit salad
1108
the adult arranged it, the identity of the participants, the nature of
participation by the adults and children, and what Erickson
(1982: p. 220) termed major constituent segments. Identication
of major segments then provided the basis for selecting excerpts for
further analysis. The type of segments differed for the baking
activities and the food preparation activities. For the baking activities the segments were consistent with each stage of adding and
mixing ingredients. For example, the rst ve segments of the
biscuit making with A1 (Adult 1) are as follows:
Segment
Segment
Segment
Segment
Segment
1:
2:
3:
4:
5:
Table 2
Transcription column layout using an example of a transcript excerpt.
Line number
.
.
.
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
.
.
.
Childs
identity
Event in
focus.
Childrens
interactions
Adults
interactions
(Adult A2)
All
Looking
at A2
Ah, we need
some
bowls. Good
heavens have
I got
any bowls?
Searches in cool
bag. How many
bowls do I need?
children
In
chorus,
all
children
Four
Childs
identity
Additional
event.
Childrens
interactions
Child C
Enters cooking
area, observes
activity
1109
1110
Table 3
Comparison of stated and enacted belief: ownership of the activity resides with the child.
Adult
Cooking
Activity
A1 Bake biscuits
A2 Bake cakes
A3 Prepare
sandwiches
Selected
belief
quote
Properties of
stated belief
Enacted Belief
Properties of
enacted belief
Rationale for
activity
A3 and A4
Ownership of activity resides
with the child
Child-lead activity
Children worked independently
Choice of ingredients, amounts, methods
Required narrow range of skills
Few stages involved in preparation
A2
It is valuable for children to
experience ways of working
that differ from a self-determined
approach
motor and cognitive skills the children were unpracticed in, for
example, cracking open an egg, mixing ingredients together using
a prescribed rubbing in method, and using weighing scales to
measure ingredients including our and butter. To accommodate
the childrens inexperience, the adults imposed a rigid structure
that afforded them greater control. The adults restricted the
number of children participating, and arranged the activity in
sequential stages. The adults directed the children through each
stage of the activity as a group. The children were actively engaged
in the preparation of the mixtures, but there were no opportunities
for them to work autonomously.
The structure of the sandwich and fruit salad preparation
activities was more open-ended than that of the baking activities
and allowed for a child-determined approach. Offered a variety of
foods to work with, the children were encouraged to select which
foods to prepare, the methods to prepare them, and determine
when it was completed. As the dishes involved fewer stages and
simpler skills restricted to spreading, slicing and chopping, the
children were able to achieve their task either independently or
with some assistance on request. Although only four places were
initially set for the children, as the activities required little adult
direction, additional children who wanted to join in were
accommodated.
The structure of the sandwich and fruit salad preparation
activities reected the adults stated beliefs that ownership of the
activity resides with the child, and contrasts with the structure of
the baking, which did not.
The rationales for the cooking activities: Table 3 shows the
rationale given by each adult for their choice of cooking activity.
The rationales explain the adults intentions for the activity and
shed light on the discrepancy between the stated and enacted
belief for the baking activities.
The baking activities: A1 explained that her intention was to
provide a creative activity of decorating biscuits, and decided to let
the children bake the biscuits too:
A3 and A4
Children make choices and decisions
They wont be able to just put all the ingredients in and do what
they want to because we want an end product today that we
dont normally go for. The idea of having the end product is that
they can actually decorate biscuits themselves.
Typically, A1 chose recipes that required less direction. I try to
do things, as I say that the children can actually cope with, without
a lot of, too much direction. Vegetable soup was one dish she
preferred because, It doesnt matter how they chop it because
youre going to cook it.
Unlike the other adults, A2 regarded directed activity as having
important learning opportunities because of, not in spite of, its
prescribed nature:
They, they cant just charge in, and you know, put an extra one
on the table as they might do if they were nger painting. There
is a process we need to go through to get the nished product.
And its unlike most of the activities in the nursery. So its
a different way of working. And thats ne in itself, so its
showing them really, this is a different kind of activity, which
needs different kinds of skills.
A1 was uncomfortable with providing an adult-determined
activity, but justied it in her rationale as a means to a later childdetermined activity of decorating biscuits. A2 viewed this activity
as complimenting child-determined activity and having value in
exposing children to different ways of working.
Sandwich and fruit salad preparation activities: In contrast, the
rationales given by adults A3 and A4 for the sandwich and fruit
salad preparation activities did reect their stated belief that
ownership of the activity resides with the child. The adults
explained that the dish chosen and the activity arranged in a way
that offered choice and decision-making opportunities to the children. For example, A3 explained, Theyll be a variety of breads and
llings for the sandwiches, so that the children can choose what
they want to do.
1111
Table 4
Comparison of stated and enacted belief: the adults role is to facilitate childrens independent learning.
Adult
A1
A2
A3
A4
Selected
belief
quote
Properties of
stated belief
Arrange environment to
foster independence
Intervene only when
necessary
Adult follows childs lead
Bake biscuits
Arrange environment to
foster independence
Intervene only when necessary
Adults to follow childs lead.
Bake cakes
Prepare sandwiches
Cooking
activity
Enacted belief
Properties of
enacted
belief:
Role of adult
Role of child
A1 and A2
Adult as expert,
child as novice
A3 and A4
Adult as Facilitator, child as
designer
Adult as expert
Introduce the cooking
activity
Divide the activity into
manageable steps
Direct the progress of the
activity
Limit access to ingredients
Keep children focused
on the activity
Service the cooking area
Elaborate the activity
Child as Novice
Join the activity
Reliant on adults expertise
Demonstrate active involvement
to the adult
Monitor progress of other
children and the activity
Try to take initiative
Adult as facilitator
Introduce the cooking activity
Become distracted
Child as Designer
Join the activity
Regard the adult as a resource
Make choices
Demonstrate active involvement
to the adult
Monitor progress of other children
and the activity
Compete in a group situation
Become distracted
1112
Table 5
Comparison of stated and enacted belief: learning should be enjoyable.
Adult
A1
Selected belief
quote
To create a warm
It shouldnt be a punitive
and secure quality
atmosphere. Learning is
place of learning for
wonderful, help them get that
young children.
Foster positive
Foster positive
disposition to learning
disposition to learning
Participation in
Participation in activity
activity is optional
is optional
Encourage quiet or
shy children to observe
and/or participate
Bake cakes
Bake cakes
Children eager
to participate,
affective support
from adults welcomed
quieter children and
encouraged all childrens
efforts Optional participation
in cooking activities;
adults welcomed all children;
adults provided
affective support
Properties of stated
belief
Cooking Activity
Enacted belief (all adults)
Properties of enacted
belief
A2
A3
A4
Prepare sandwiches
utensils, and in the case of the baking activities, for clearing away
ingredients that had already been added and were no longer
needed.
Table 4 shows that there were also similarities in the way the
adults interacted with children in ways that extended and supported each activity. The category Elaborate the activity describes
the strategies adults used to test the childrens knowledge and
recall, drawing on the childrens home experiences and relating
them to the activity. For example, children were asked what
ingredients go into a cake, or whether they ate sandwiches when
they went on picnics. They were also asked to observe and describe
the foods. For example, the children were encouraged to compare
the inside and outside of the fruits, or describe the changing
consistency of the cake mixture as the sugar dissolved.
9.2.3. Summary
Differences in the interactions of the adults in the two types of
activities arose from the different roles they adopted. In the baking
activities the adult adopted the role of expert, which resulted in
strategies that enabled them to assume responsibility for the
activity by directing and managing the children and controlling the
ingredients. In contrast, the adults in the sandwich and fruit salad
preparation activities displayed a facilitatory role that encouraged
children to assume responsibility, and maintained their role to one
of support and assistance. Despite some differences, the adults also
shared several strategies. These included strategies related to
health and safety, such as washing hands and removing utensils
and foods no longer needed or used; announcing the start of the
activity, and elaborating the activity in order to nd ways to have
the children think about aspects of the activity.
9.2.4. Differences in the participatory roles of the children in the
baking and sandwich and fruit salad preparation activities
Differences emerged in the interactional roles of the children,
which are characterized as that of a novice or designer. In the
baking activity the children adopted the role of novice, and the role
of designer in the fruit salad and sandwich preparation activities.
These differences are captured in the categories Reliant on the
adults expertise in the baking activities, and Regard the adult as
a resource and Make choices, in the fruit salad and sandwich preparation activities. In the baking activities the children lacked the
knowledge and skills to be able to carry out this activity alone, and
were dependent on the adult to guide and direct them. The children
attended to the adult, observing the techniques she demonstrated
and following her instructions and explanations.
In contrast to the baking activities, the childrens role during the
fruit salad and sandwich preparation activities was that of designer.
This term is used to describe the childs role in designing or creating
their dish. The children regarded the adult as a resource, there to
provide assistance when required, for example, one child asked,
Can you help me? when she was unable to slice an apple. In
addition children asked the adults to bring utensils and food items
within reach, as well as to check the procedure, for example,
whether to wash fruit before chopping.
Table 4 shows that the children in the fruit salad and sandwich
preparation activities made choices in ways children in the baking
activities were unable to do. The category Make choices lists the
choices the children offered, such as choosing which foods to
prepare. For example, when asked by the adult, So what would you
like to choose to cut? a child replied, I think Ill choose an orange.
One child decided to halve her bread before making the sandwich,
whilst another decided not to halve his sandwich at all. Children also
chose the method of preparation, such as chopping or slicing, how
much to do, and when they had completed the activity. Some children refused adults offers of assistance. For example when one child
1113
told the adult he is was unable remove the peel from an orange, the
adult offered to cut the peel off using a knife. The child changed his
mind and insisted on peeling the orange himself. Children also
challenged instructions, as demonstrated by one child who initially
refused to wash her hands in readiness for the activity.
The category of Try to take initiative in the baking activity
demonstrates the childrens attempts to assert themselves, and
contrasts with childrens ability and expectation to assume
responsibility through making choices in the sandwich and fruit
salad preparation activities. Some children tried to negotiate more
responsibility for the activity, such as adding more of an ingredient.
When A1 added more our to one childs mixture because it was
too sticky, several children chimed in, And mine, Can you give
me just a little tiny bit? At other times children tried to add or play
with ingredients without negotiating. Some children showed
initiative by deciding to leave before the activity was completed.
The children also occasionally attempted to initiate conversation
with each other and with the adult, but their attention was gently
steered back to the activity by the adult.
The category Compete in a group situation for the fruit salad and
sandwich preparation activities arose from the high number of
children participating at these activities. This resulted in more
requests for assistance and a longer wait time for an adult response.
The children devised a variety of tactics to attract the adults
attention, for example, some children repeated their requests with
increasing loudness, or leant nearer the adult. As well as competing
for the adults attention, children also had to compete for resources.
In the fruit salad activity one child tried to prize a chopping board
away from another, and the adult stepped in and suggested they
share the board. There was no competition for resources in the
baking activities as the number of participating children was limited
to that planned, and sufcient quantities of items were available.
9.2.5. Similarities in the participatory roles of the children in the
baking and sandwich and fruit salad preparation activities
Join the activity was common to all activities. In each activity the
children approached the adult and asked permission to join in, or
prepared for the activity by sitting down, donning an apron, or
rolling up their sleeves. The children were seemingly drawn to the
activity by the adults earlier preparations and setting up of the
activity.
Once the activity was underway the children shared categories
relating to involvement with the adults and the other participating
children. Demonstrate active involvement to the adult describes the
strategies the children adopted in drawing attention to or seeking
reassurance about their progress. During the cakemaking activity
one child said, This look like cake, then a little later showed the
mixture by pushing the bowl to the adult, saying, There you are.
The children also turned to the adult when they found something
interesting or puzzling, shared short commentaries on their actions
or intentions, and talked of home events related to the activities,
and asked or answered questions to the adult. The category Monitor
progress of other children and the activity includes the childrens
observations of and comments about each others mixtures and
dishes, and when they thought another child was misbehaving.
The children in both types of cooking activities were briey
distracted by conversations with each other and the adult on topics
unrelated to the activity, as described in the category, Become
distracted. In the baking activities, the childrens attention was also
diverted to other events occurring simultaneously in the classroom,
such as a sudden loud noise.
9.2.6. Summary
In the baking activities the children took on the role of novice,
and their strategies reected a reliance on the adults expertise.
1114
10. Discussion
This study examined the relationship between the adults
pedagogical beliefs, choice and structure of the activity, and the
nature of participation of the adults and children during a cooking
activity in the nursery classroom.
10.1. Pedagogical beliefs and classroom practices
1115
10.6. Conclusion
This study throws light on the inter-related nature of adult and
child participation and activity structure in the nursery, and
pedagogical beliefs and activity choice. The choice made by the
adults resulted in both adult-led and child-led cooking activities,
and analysis revealed not only how the structuring of these are
associated with different interactional experiences for the children,
but also reect differences and tensions in their beliefs about the
appropriateness and value of this type of activity in a child-centred
nursery classroom.
Appendix
Interview questions
About the adults teaching experience
(1) How long have you worked in childcare?
(2) What areas of childcare have you worked in?
(3) What training have you had?
(4) What do you think are the most important aspects of role?
(5) How do you put these aspects into practice with the children?
(6) What level or type of interaction do you think childcare
workers ought to give?
Pre-activity questions
(1) How will you structure the activity itselfdthe materials, table,
etc.?
(2) In what sorts of ways do you anticipate supporting the children
during this activity?
(3) Do you vary your approach/support with different children?
How?
(4) What do you think the children learn from this activity?
1116
McCarty, F., Abbott-Shim, M., & Lambert, R. (2001). The relationship between
teacher beliefs and practices, and Head Start classroom quality. Early Education
and Development, 12, 225238.
Miller, L., & Smith, A. P. (2004). Practitioners beliefs and childrens experiences of
literacy in four early years settings. Early Years, 24, 121131.
OBrien, M., & Bi, X. (1995). Language learning in context: Teacher and toddler
speech in three classroom play areas. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education,
15, 148163.
Ochs, E. (1979). Transcription as theory. In E. Ochs, & B. B. Schieffelin (Eds.),
Developmental Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press.
Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up
a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62, 307332.
Pascal, C. (1993). Capturing the quality of education provision for young children: A
story of developing professionals and developing methodology. European Early
Childhood Education Research Journal, 1, 6980.
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York: Oxford
University Press.
Rogoff, B., & Gauvain, M. (1986). A method for the analysis of patterns, illustrated with data on mother-child instructional interaction. In J. Valsiner
(Ed.), The role of the individual subject in scientic psychology. New York:
Plenum Press.
Rogoff, B., Mistry, J., Goncu, A., & Mosier, C. (1993). Guided participation in cultural
activity and caregivers. Monographs of the society for Research in Child Development, 58. (8, Serial No. 236).
Rogoff, B., & Wertsch, J. V. (1984). Editors notes. In B. Rogoff, & J. V. Wertsch (Eds.),
Childrens learning in the zone of proximal development. San Francisco: JosseyBass.
Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics in qualitative research: Grounded theory
procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Tzuo, P. W. (2007). The tension between teacher control and childrens
freedom in a child-centred classroom: Resolving the practical dilemma
through a closer look at the related theories. Early Education Journal, 35,
3339.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wertsch, J. V., & Kanner, B. (1992). A sociocultural approach to intellectual development. In R. Sternberg, & C. Berg (Eds.), Intellectual development. New York:
Cambridge University Press.
Wertsch, J. V., McNamee, G. D., McLane, J. B., & Budwig, N. A. (1980). The
adultchild dyad as a problem-solving system. Child Development, 51,
12151221.
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving.
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89100.
Wood, E. (2007). Reconceptualising child-centred education: Contemporary
directions in policy, theory and practice in early childhood. Forum: For
Promoting 319 Comprehensive Education, 49, 119134, Available from: http://dx.
doi.org/10.2304/forum.2007.49.1.119. Accessed 19.08.07.