Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
A. Definition/Comparison
SOCIUS
human relationship that you have
with an organized group or the
person that you can encounter
through his/her social function
has a social function
love
NEIGHBOR
the personal way that you can
encounter another as a person,
the interpersonal, with varying
degrees of intimacy
real attitude of a person and has
no social function
in an indirect manner. They can
be of the same charity when they
work at the same time. Charity
must come hand in hand with
justice.
justice
o
o
o
o
o
SAMARITAN
o The man who stopped
o Does not form part of a group
o Not burdened by his social responsibility
o Available for encounter and the presence of others
o Direct relationship: man to man
o Conduct takes place without mediation of an institution
Who is my neighbor?
Go and do likewise
Bible advocates charity: Whatever you do to the least your brothers you do it
unto me.
o The least are representatives of Christ.
o Theological/Christological intention of prophecy
We cannot simply act like the Samaritan did. Those who help the (apparently)
stranded by the side of lifes road do so at great risk to their own safety
and well-being, and encourage exploitation of benevolence.
However, as time passes by, the society gets complicated in terms of
relationships and social institutions.
Culture arent the same yesterday and today.
There has to be a balance.
Today: society in disorder, society full of plundering.
C. Focus
The focus of this course, as such, will be Ricur's ethical thought. We will
see how he visits the theme of Responsibility of the self, who is
considered in relation to another person and involved in particular
institutions.
It attempts to understand being-with-others-in society. Our life is social in
everything. By everything we mean everything that is subject to human
responsibility.
The change from representable solidarity to unrepresentable solidaritythe
individual person is coresponsible for all other individual persons in the
collective person not only as the representative of an office, rank, or any
position in social structure but also as unique personal individual and as
bearer of individual conscience.
D. Socius and neighbor interwined?
o Socius is not negative unless and until it is going over from what
is right and just taking advantage, misuse of authority, and the
like.
o neighbor relationship is more than just treating the other as a
subject. It has to go beyond than that and is a continuing event.
o Too much neighbor - may lead us to being too other centered and
make us people pleasers
o choice and balance
o Too much socius - makes us too impersonal when it comes to
relating to other people
The theme of the neighbor: primarily an appeal to the awakening of
consciousness
absurdity of condemning machines, technocracy, administrative
apparatus, social security and others.
All technicity has the innocence of the instrument.
The vice of the social existence of modern man does not lie in being
against nature: what is lacking is not naturalness, but charity
Condemns a vertical extravagance, tendency of social organisms to
absorb and exhaust at their particular level the whole problematic of
human relationships.
The theme of the neighbor: permanent critique of social bond.
o Compared to love of neighbor, social bond is:
never as profound
o social mediations will never become equivalent of encounter or
immediate presence
or never as comprehensive
o group only declares itself against another group and shuts itself
off from others
Responsibility
The dignity of the human person in turn provides the link of justice to
truth. Justice and truth (and love) are grounded on the value of the human
person as sacred and inviolable. Truth as a value is a call to bear witness
to some light, a vocation to shed light on what is revealed. Insofar as man as
man is given the word, he shares in the sacredness of this revelation and the
response-ability to bear witness to it. To refuse to testify is to do injustice not
only to others in the community, but also, and worse, to oneself.
Conclusion
It is charity which governs the relationship to the socius and the
relationship to the neighbor, giving them a common intention.