Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Laurence Ales
Contents
I
II
Syllabus
Class Notes
13
14
Measurament
2.1 GDP . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.2 Forecasting . . . . . . . .
2.3 Trend and Cycles . . . .
2.4 Nominal and Real GDP
24
25
39
48
56
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
The Household
62
The Firm
77
The Government
88
Equilibrium
93
Optimality
104
7.1 Optimal Taxation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108
Growth
119
8.1 Malthus and Solow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 129
8.2 Endogenous Growth Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146
Dynamic Model
9.1 Forecasting: Part 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9.2 The Household . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9.3 The Government . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
152
152
160
173
3 of 260
10 Credit Imperfections
203
11 Money
11.1 Monetary model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
11.2 The Fed and Monetary Policy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
11.3 What Economists Do . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
216
221
226
236
241
III
244
Problem Sets
Acknowledgements
This document has evolved over the years with contributions from:
Laurence Ales, Nicolas Petrosky-Nadeau, Chris Sleet, Sevin Yeltekin.
Invaluable feedback was also provided by students of 73-240 at Carnegie Mellons Tepper School of Business. And by the numerous teaching assistants of those classes.
These materials are subject to copyright and are being provided for the personal educational use by students enrolled in this course. Any other use, including further reproduction and distribution of the materials (whether in hard copy or electronic form) is
strictly prohibited. As an example, you may not copy any of these materials and upload
them to any other web sites without the prior permission of the applicable copyright
holder.
Some graphs and diagrams are taken from:
1. Williamson, Macroeconomics, 5th edition.
2. Hoover, Applied Intermediate Macroeconomics
3. Abel, Bernanke, Croushore, Macroeconomics.
4. Jones, Macroeconomics, 2nd edition.
5. Acemoglu, Introduction to modern economic growth.
5 of 260
Part I
Syllabus
6 of 260
Learning objectives:
By the end of this course the student will be able to...
1. ...Understand and be able to use the various measures of an aggregate economys
performance and well-being;
2. ...Be able to perform simple forecast of macroeconomic variables;
This version: January 11, 2014
Homeworks Policies:
This version: January 11, 2014
10 of 260
Schedule
Important dates:
Midterms on Feb 24th and Apr 9th.
Final exam date: TBA
(for updates check: http://www.cmu.edu/hub/).
Grades posted by May 15th.
The following is a tentative schedule, refer to Blackboard for updates on dates and topics.
Week
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Monday
(Jan 13)
Introduction
(Jan 20)
No class - MLK day
(Jan 27)
Introduction to Forecasting
(Feb 3)
The Consumer
(Feb 10)
The Firm
(Feb 17)
Equilibrium and
Pareto optimality
(Feb 24)
MIDTERM 1
(Mar 3)
Growth: Malthus
(Mar 10)
Spring Break
(Mar 17)
Growth: endogenous growth
(Mar 24)
Inter-temporal model
(Mar 31)
Finance and macro
(Apr 7)
Review
(Apr 14)
Money
(Apr 21
Monetary model: Policy
(Apr 28)
Unemployment, wages
Wednesday
(Jan 15)
Measurement: levels and GDP
(Jan 22)
Nominal and real Quantities;
Measurement: fluctuations
(Jan 29)
The Consumer
(Feb 5)
The Firm
(Feb 12)
The Government
(Feb 19)
Taxation and spending
Friday
(Jan 17)
(Feb 26)
Growth facts
(Mar 5)
Growth: Solow
(Mar 12)
Spring Break
(Mar 19)
Saving and Investment
(Mar 26)
Inter-temporal model: Policy
(Apr 2)
Finance and macro
(Apr 9)
MIDTERM 2
(Apr 16)
Monetary model
(Apr 23)
Labor market facts
(Apr 30)
Final Review
(Feb 28)
(Jan 24)
(Jan 31)
(Feb 7)
(Feb 14)
(Feb 21)
(Mar 7)
No class
(Mar 14)
No class
(Mar 21)
(Mar 28)
(Apr 4)
(Apr 11)
No class
(Apr 18)
No class
(Apr 25)
(May 2)
Part II
Class Notes
13 of 260
Chapter 1
Introduction and Methodology
14 of 260
About Myself
My name is: Laurence Ales
Born in Italy
B.S. in Physics
Ph.d. in Economics
The Syllabus
Slide 4 of 27
Office Hours:
Ales: Th 3:30-5:30
Bellofatto : T 1.30-3.30
Rho: Th 1:30-3:30
The textbook:
Slide 5 of 27
15 of 260
http://tinyurl.com/evaluations-ales
Slide 6 of 27
Recommendations I/II
1
x
Slide 7 of 27
Recommendations II/II
Data Analysis:
16 of 260
Slide 8 of 27
A Bad Graph
How many bad graphical habits can you spot in this graph?
Slide 9 of 27
Class announcements
(that will be mirrored in the Blackboard website).
Macroeconomic news.
Slide 10 of 27
Lets Start!
17 of 260
Slide 11 of 27
Upcoming...
Notes on Methodology.
Slide 12 of 27
Your Questions
18 of 260
Slide 16 of 27
...Understand how credit and labor frictions operate and how they
might impact macro economic behavior.
Slide 17 of 27
19 of 260
Methodology
Slide 18 of 27
Slide 19 of 27
20 of 260
A theory should:
2
Milton Friedman The Methodology of Positive Economics In Essays In Positive
Economics (Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1966), pp. 3-16, 30-43.
21 of 260
Source: The Onion
Slide 23 of 27
Building a Model
A theory written by an economist is simply a model.
What is a model? A simple virtual representation of a real
environment.
Some examples:
Slide 24 of 27
Slide 25 of 27
Model Ingredients
Actors:
Households
Firms
Markets
Government
Quantities:
Households: Consumption, Savings, Hours worked
Firm: Output, Vacancies
Markets: Prices, Inflation
22 of 260
Roadmap
Slide 27 of 27
23 of 260
Chapter 2
Measurament
24 of 260
2.1
GDP
25 of 260
Slide 5 of 43
26 of 260
Slide 7 of 43
Price in USD
$ 4.56
$ 6.72
$ 2.61
$ 4.66
$ 1.50
$ 7.51
Slide 8 of 43
Appendix: Data
Where To Find Data:
National:
1
International:
1
Amount (USD)
$ 49,922
$ 52,231
$ 33,115
$ 10,247
$ 1,630
$ 482
$ 6,075
$ 1,491
27 of 260
Source: IMF
Slide 11 of 43
Slide 12 of 43
28 of 260
Slide 13 of 43
Slide 14 of 43
Slide 15 of 43
29 of 260
Some observations:
1
It grows;
It fluctuates;
Slide 17 of 43
Real%GDP%
10000"
8000"
6000"
4000"
2000"
0"
1830"
1850"
1870"
1890"
1910"
1930"
1950"
1970"
1990"
Year%
History of GDP
30 of 260
Slide 19 of 43
Slide 20 of 43
3 Definitions of GDP
BEA uses 3 alternative definitions/approaches to GDP:
197
Table 1
Three Ways to Measure GDP
2005 share
(percent)
183.5
83.5
100.0
56.6
0.3
17.6
7.4
0.5
5.5
12.9
100.0
70.0
16.7
19.0
"5.7
100.0
Equals:
Slide 22 of 43
31 of 260
Slide 23 of 43
Some observations:
1
32 of 260
Slide 25 of 43
Coconut Producer
Government
Restaurant
Consumer
Slide 27 of 43
Total expenditures = C + I + G + N X
Slide 28 of 43
33 of 260
Government
Restaurant
Consumer
Expenditure approach:
GDP =
$8
|{z}
Buy coconut
Slide 29 of 43
+ $|{z}
30 +
Buy Meal
$| {z
5.5}
= $ 43.5
Government
Slide 30 of 43
Government
Restaurant
Consumer
Income approach:
34 of 260
GDP = $| 14.5
0.5} + |{z}
$ 24 +
{z } + |$ {z
Wages
Slide 31 of 43
Interests
Profits
$| {z
4.5}
= $ 43.5
Note 1: the sum of value added equals the value of final products
Note 2: what is the valued added of the government?
(use value of inputs)
Slide 32 of 43
Government
Restaurant
Consumer
Product approach:
GDP =
$ 20
|{z}
Coconut Producer
Slide 33 of 43
+ $ (30 12) +
|
{z
}
Restaurant
$| {z
5.5}
= $ 43.5
Government
35 of 260
Slide 34 of 43
Transfers
C
|{z}
Consumption
+ |{z}
S
Saving
Slide 35 of 43
|Y = C + I{z+ G + N X}
GDP Definition
Government Deficit
I|
{z S}
Slide 36 of 43
36 of 260
Slide 37 of 43
N
X
|{z}
=0
Non-market production:
Home production (think about housework, childcare, DIY)
In developing countries: subsistence farmers
Underground economy
Slide 38 of 43
Fraction of GDP
77%
70%
67%
27%
10%
9%
Slide 39 of 43
Tax audits.
Indirect Approaches:
Slide 40 of 43
37 of 260
A bad is a good that the more you have of it, the less happy you
are about it.
Slide 41 of 43
Source: OECD.
Slide 42 of 43
38 of 260
P90/P10
2.72
3.39
4.21
4.31
5.91
8.53
2.2
Forecasting
39 of 260
40 of 260
Its a line!!...almost
The graph above implies a constant growth rate (approx. 2%)
Slide 7 of 48
Slide 8 of 48
Forecasting: Introduction
Slide 9 of 48
Forecasting
This Lecture:
1
Trend forecasting;
41 of 260
Slide 10 of 48
Forecasting
A good source:
Slide 12 of 48
42 of 260
Slide 13 of 48
It = {xn }t1
n=1 : for the forecast we have available only past values of
the time series we want to forecast. This will be the case in this
lecture.
t1
It = {xn }t1
n=1 {cn }n=1 : for the forecast we have available past
values of the time series we want to forecast and of another time
series ct . We will talk about this later in the course.
Forecasting: Errors
Definition (Forecast Errors)
Suppose that at time t we have forecasted the future value: xt+1 . At
time t + 1 we observe the real value: x
t+1 . Our error is:
et+1 = x
t+1 xt+1 .
Slide 14 of 48
Slide 15 of 48
Slide 16 of 48
43 of 260
I1960 = {
xn }1959
n=1947 .
where yt is GDP in year t.
Fitting a Trend
Returns the slope of the linear regression line through data points
in known ys (values) and known xs (dates).
Slide 18 of 48
44 of 260
Slide 19 of 48
31#
30#
29#
28#
27#
26#
25#
1947#
1957#
1967#
1977#
Log#Real#GDP#
1987#
1997#
2007#
Trend#Forecast#
Slide 20 of 48
Devia&ons*From*Trend*
0.6%
0.5%
0.4%
0.3%
0.2%
0.1%
0%
1947%
1957%
1967%
1977%
1987%
1997%
2007%
!0.1%
Slide 21 of 48
dt1
| {z }
dt is an auto-regressive process:
1
2
Slide 22 of 48
t
|{z}
45 of 260
We have that:
cov(dt , dt1 )
.
var(dt )
(
k 2 if = 1
= 12k 2
if < 1
12
q
k2
Slide 24 of 48
46 of 260
Compute t = dt dt1 .
Compute k2 .
Slide 25 of 48
q
k2 and
31#
30#
29#
28#
27#
26#
25#
1947#
1957#
1967#
Log#Real#GDP#
1977#
Trend#Forecast#
1987#
1997#
Lower#Bound#
Upper#Bound#
2007#
Slide 26 of 48
47 of 260
2.3
48 of 260
Depression
Large output drop > 10% lasting several years
Slide 28 of 48
Slide 29 of 48
Slide 30 of 48
49 of 260
Devia&ons*From*Trend*
0.6%
0.5%
0.4%
0.3%
0.2%
0.1%
0%
1947%
1957%
1967%
1977%
1987%
1997%
2007%
!0.1%
Slide 31 of 48
Non-Linear Trend
The previous plot shows that a linear trend misses the fast growth
of the 70s and the slowdown in the 90s.
Slide 32 of 48
t
|{z}
Cyclical component
xt
|{z}
Trend component
t=1
t=2
50 of 260
Slide 33 of 48
Slide 35 of 48
51 of 260
Slide 36 of 48
Slide 37 of 48
Slide 38 of 48
When the trend is removed from the two variables economist usually
talk about co-movement rather than correlation
52 of 260
Definition
A macroeconomic variable is:
Slide 40 of 48
Slide 41 of 48
53 of 260
Slide 42 of 48
Slide 43 of 48
Consumption is:
Slide 44 of 48
54 of 260
Investment is: pro-cyclical, coincident and more variable
Slide 45 of 48
Slide 47 of 48
55 of 260
2.4
56 of 260
Slide 2 of 16
Some definitions:
Slide 3 of 16
A 2 x 2 Economy
Example economy lasts for 2 periods: 2013 - 2014; 2 goods are
produced: Apples and Oranges. The data:
Product/Time
Apples
Oranges
Prices
Apples
Oranges
Values
Apples
Oranges
Nominal GDP
2013
5
200
2014
10
250
1.2 $
0.2 $
0.6 $
0.24 $
6$
40 $
46 $
6$
60 $
66 $
57 of 260
Real GDP =
Nominal GDP
Price Index
Price Index(t) =
Price level(t)
Price level(base year)
Slide 5 of 16
Slide 6 of 16
Laspeyres vs Paasche
Let Pit =prices, Xit =quantities of good i at time t. Nominal GDP is:
GDP (t) =
N
X
Pit Xit
i=1
Let t0 be the base year. The Laspeyres index for year time t is:
P
Laspeyres
PN
(t) = PNi=1
Pit Xit0
t0 t0
i=1 Pi Xi
Let t0 be the base year. The Paasche index for year t is:
58 of 260
P
Slide 7 of 16
Paasche
PN
(t) = PNi=1
Pit Xit
t0 t
i=1 Pi Xi
2014
//
10 5
250
/// 200
1.2 $
0.2 $
0.6 $
0.24 $
6$
40 $
1
3$
48 $
= 51$
46$ = 1.11
3$+48$
6$+40$
2014
10
250
1.2 $
0.2 $
0.6 $
0.24 $
12 $
50 $
1
6$
60 $
66$
= 62$
= 1.064
6$+60$
12$+50$
Nominal GDP
Price Index
2013
46
46/1=46
46/1=46
2014
66
66/1.11
66/1.064
Growth
43.5%
29.26 %
34.86 %
GDP deflator
Slide 10 of 16
59 of 260
CPI
Key feature 1: keep quantities fixed at base year (2009)
Key feature 2: only quantities purchased by consumers (C)
P
P 2014 X 2009
CPI(2014) = PiC i2009 i2009
Xi
iC Pi
Slide 12 of 16
60 of 260
Slide 13 of 16
Inflation
Definition (Inflation)
Inflation (i): the % change in the GDP deflator between two consecutive
years. For example:
i2014 =
Slide 14 of 16
Inflation in the US
Slide 15 of 16
61 of 260
Slide 16 of 16
Chapter 3
The Household
62 of 260
Slide 3 of 42
The Household
Data
The utility function
Indifference Curves
Household constraints
Househols optimization
+ Income and Substitution effects
Aggregation
Slide 4 of 42
The Household
Who are the households in the US economy?
63 of 260
Slide 5 of 42
Slide 6 of 42
9, 984, 000
100 6.46%
154, 408, 000
Slide 7 of 42
64 of 260
Slide 8 of 42
Expenses
$ 6,532
$ 16,940
$ 8,505
$ 3,466
The Household
Consumption: c
Leisure: l
Slide 9 of 42
We assume that:
1
Slide 10 of 42
About Assumptions
65 of 260
Slide 11 of 42
Slide 12 of 42
df (x)
f (x + x) f (x)
f 0 (x) = lim
x0
dx
x
Note:
d2 f (x)
dx2
df 0 (x)
dx
Slide 13 of 42
66 of 260
dU (c, l)
>0
dl
d2 U (c, l)
<0
dl2
Slide 15 of 42
Indifference Curves
Utility is increasing Indifference curves are downward sloping
HH like diversity Indifference curves are convex
Household Constraints
67 of 260
Slide 17 of 42
HH Constraints
In our economic model, HH have
Slide 18 of 42
HH Constraints
Slide 19 of 42
c = consumption
h = time endowment
l = leisure time
w = hourly wage
= dividend income
T = lump sum taxes (rebates)
c = w(h l) + T
68 of 260
Food Stamps:
http://www.fns.usda.gov/pd/snapmain.htm
Unemployment Insurance:
http://www.ows.doleta.gov/unemploy/index.asp
Disability Insurance:
http://www.ssa.gov/disability/
Slide 21 of 42
Unemployment Insurance
Claims for unemployment insurance is a leading indicator:
Slide 22 of 42
69 of 260
Slide 24 of 42
Consumer Maximization
Slide 25 of 42
Consumer Maximization
70 of 260
Slide 26 of 42
Only H is optimal!!
Slide 27 of 42
s.t. w(h l) + T = c
Write the lagrangian:
L(c, l, ) = U (c, l) + [w(h l) + T c]
where is our lagrange multiplier. First order conditions
(C) :
(l) :
Uc (c, l)
Ul (c, l) w
=0
=0
() : w(h l) + T c = 0
Slide 28 of 42
Ul (c,l)
Uc (c,l) ?
Ul (c,l)
Uc (c,l)
= M RSl,c = w
71 of 260
Slide 29 of 42
Which implies
M RSl,c
| {z }
=w
Slide 30 of 42
Choosing Unemployment
Slide 31 of 42
72 of 260
Slide 32 of 42
Income Effect:
Substitution Effect:
Slide 33 of 42
Slide 34 of 42
73 of 260
Slide 35 of 42
Slide 36 of 42
Slide 37 of 42
74 of 260
Slide 38 of 42
The Issue:
1
Slide 39 of 42
Key assumptions:
1
Slide 40 of 42
Aggregation
We have:
N
X
i=1
c,l
c,l
C = N c: aggregate consumption;
L = N l: aggregate leisure.
75 of 260
Slide 41 of 42
12%
9%
1%
16%
4%
15%
1%
8%
6%
32%
14%
5%
41%
5%
16%
3%
Food
Alcoholic beverages
Housing
Transporta7on
Healthcare
Entertainment
Misc.
Food
Housing
Transporta7on
Entertainment
Misc.
Alcoholic
beverages
Apparel
and
services
Healthcare
Personal
insurance
and
pensions
76 of 260
Chapter 4
The Firm
77 of 260
Slide 2 of 31
The Firm
Data: firms in the US
The representative firm
The production function
Firm maximization
Calibrating the capital share:
Slide 3 of 31
6,022,127
7,601,160
119,917,165
Source: http://www.census.gov/epcd/www/smallbus.html
78 of 260
Slide 4 of 31
U.S.classical
Firms:
SizeofDistribution
example
a power or scaling law. The empirical data for 1997
!
are shown binned as a PDF in figure 1 below, with size measured by
Look Data
on the
web for Zipf law!
of such vast regularity are highly unusual in the social
A
firm
over
time:
sciences. Only at theLINK
extremes of the support do the data depart in any
Slide 5 of 31
systematic way from the distribution. Indeed, there are relatively too few
small and very large firms in the data. Such deviations are often
U.S.very
Firms:
Data
1
The Zipf distribution is usually considered a discrete distribution; more on this below.
The origin of these data are tax filings and, for reasons of confidentiality, only binned
data are available. The kinds of statistical procedures used on these data are therefore
not generally commensurate with other papers in this volume that analyze raw data.
2
Source: http://www.bea.gov/industry/
Look at behavior of Professional vs Manufacturing.
79 of 260
Slide 7 of 31
The Firm
A firm converts inputs (factors of productions)
into output (consumption goods)
Slide 8 of 31
Capital: K
Labor employed: N d
Total Factor Productivity (TFP): z
Output: Y
Slide 9 of 31
F is increasing
dF (K, N )
>0
dK
dF (K, N )
>0
dN
80 of 260
Slide 10 of 31
Marginal Products
Marginal product of capital (labor) M PK (M PN ) is the additional
output produced by increasing capital (labor) by one unit,
keeping fixed the other input.
Slide 11 of 31
F is concave:
M PN decreases as N increases (alternatively
d2 F
dN 2
< 0)
d2 F
dL2
< 0)
Slide 12 of 31
81 of 260
Why do we care? Think how wages change with technology
Slide 13 of 31
Firm Maximization
Slide 15 of 31
82 of 260
Slide 16 of 31
Profits
Let:
Revenue: zF (K, N d )
Variable cost: wN d
Profits = = zF (K, N d ) wN d
Slide 17 of 31
Choose N d so that: M PN = w
Slide 18 of 31
Solution: Intuition
Suppose M PN > w
Then raise N d very little: revenue raise faster than the costs
Suppose M PN < w
Then lower N d very little: revenue decrease slower than the costs
In both cases we reach a contradiction so that the only alternative is:
M PN = w
83 of 260
Slide 19 of 31
What is ?
Slide 20 of 31
Solution: Example
Useful property of a Cobb-Douglas production function:
M PN
= z(1 )K N 1 N 1
= (1 )zK N 1 N 1
M PN = (1 )
Y
N
wN
Y
Where:
84 of 260
Y is GDP
Y
N
In the NIPAs, GDP is defined as the market value of the final goods and services
users, as the sum of income payments and other costs incurred in the production of goods
and services, and as the sum of the value added at each stage of production (chart 2.1).
Although these three ways of measuring GDP are conceptually the same, their calculation
may not result in identical estimates of GDP because of differences in data sources,
timing, and estimation techniques.
Personal consumption
expenditures
Compensation of employees
Government consumption
expenditures and gross investment
Net exports
GDP
The sum of final
expenditures
GDI
The sum of income payments
and costs incurred in
production
As the sumthe
of goods
and services
sold to final
users. This
measure, known as the
Lets compute expenditures
1.from
BEA
data:
Table
2.1
approach is used to identify the final goods and services purchased by
Slide 23 of 31
2-7
Changes in Capital Stock and
In our example:
log(Yt ) = zt + log(Kt ) + (1 ) log Nt
So that (if Nt and zt do not change)
Growth Rate of Yt = log(Yt+1 ) log(Yt ) = Growth Rate of Kt
|
{z
}
10%
Labor Demand
85 of 260
Slide 25 of 31
Source: http://www.bls.gov/web/cewbd/
Slide 26 of 31
Source: http://www.bls.gov/web/cewbd/
Note how the recession unemployment due to
contractions rather than failures.
Slide 27 of 31
86 of 260
z(1 )
|
{z
M PN
Slide 28 of 31
K
N
=w
D)
Labor Demand
The firm problem provides the key equation that determines the
demand for labor:
z(1 )K
N=
w
1
Comparative statics:
1
z increases N increases
K increases N increases
w increases N decreases
Slide 29 of 31
z(1 )K
w
1
Proceeding as before:
log Nt =
i
1h
log zt log wt + log(1 ) + log Kt
.
Firm have a minimum firm size N
87 of 260
Slide 31 of 31
Chapter 5
The Government
88 of 260
The Government
Slide 3 of 41
Government expenditures:
Slide 4 of 41
89 of 260
Source: OECD
Slide 5 of 41
The Government
In our model the government is benevolent:
maximizes welfare of its citizen
Question: why do we need a government?
It provides public goods:
Slide 7 of 41
90 of 260
Slide 8 of 41
2011
2011
Security Discretionary
Excise Taxes
Net Interest
Other Mandatory
Programs and
Disaster Costs
Non-Security
Discretionary
Social Security
Medicare
Other Receipts
Unemployment
Insurance
Medicare
Payroll
Taxes
Medicaid
Borrowing and
Other Net
Financing
Social
Security
Payroll Taxes
Individual
Income Taxes
Corporation
Income Taxes
2015
2015
Security Discretionary
Non-Security
Discretionary
Excise Taxes
Net Interest
Other Mandatory
Programs and
Disaster Costs
Social
Security
Slide 9 of 41
Medicare
Other Receipts
Unemployment
Insurance
Medicare Payroll
Taxes
Social
Security
Payroll Taxes
Individual
Income Taxes
Medicaid
153
Corporation
Income Taxes
Slide 10 of 41
2011
2011
Security Discretionary
Excise Taxes
Net Interest
Other Mandatory
Programs and
Disaster Costs
Non-Security
Discretionary
Social Security
Medicare
Other Receipts
Unemployment
Insurance
Medicare
Payroll
Taxes
Medicaid
Borrowing and
Other Net
Financing
Social
Security
Payroll Taxes
Individual
Income Taxes
Corporation
Income Taxes
2015
2015
Excise Taxes
Net Interest
Other Receipts
Unemployment
Insurance
Other Mandatory
Medicare Payroll
Taxes
Social
91 of 260
Slide 12 of 41
Source:
http://www.cbo.gov/publications/collections/tax/2010/graphics.cfm
Slide 13 of 41
92 of 260
Chapter 6
Equilibrium
93 of 260
Competitive Equilibrium
Slide 14 of 41
Slide 15 of 41
94 of 260
Slide 16 of 41
A Note on Aggregation
Remember:
Slide 17 of 41
Equilibrium
The idea:
1
Equilibrium
Must be optimal:
everybody (household and firm) must like the decision
it has taken.
Must be feasible:
cannot have more consumption than goods produced.
95 of 260
Slide 19 of 41
Slide 20 of 41
96 of 260
Slide 22 of 41
d2 C(l)
dl2
dC(l)
dl
()
= z dF
dN < 0
<0
Slide 24 of 41
97 of 260
Slide 25 of 41
dC(l)
dF (k, h l)
=z
= M PN
dl
dN
or in words:
Marginal rate of transformation = marginal product of labor
for any (C, l) on the PPF we can find the wage!
Slide 26 of 41
Slide 27 of 41
D'
98 of 260
Slide 28 of 41
Slide 29 of 41
Online Survey!
Increases by G
99 of 260
Slide 31 of 41
Examples
Slide 32 of 41
Examples
Changes in productivity: z.
Slide 33 of 41
Government Spending
Suppose the government increases its expenditure : G > 0
100 of 260
Slide 34 of 41
Government Spending
Suppose the government increases its expenditure : G = G2 G1 > 0
1
Question 1: C vs. G?
Question 2: what has happened to the real wage?
Question 3: does GDP increase?
Question 4: does the household prefer the increase in G?
Slide 35 of 41
Slide 36 of 41
101 of 260
Slide 37 of 41
Changes in TFP
Suppose there is an increase in TFP: z > 0
Slide 38 of 41
Changes in TFP
Summarizing:
1
z1 z2 with z2 > z1
Consumption increases C1 C2
Slide 39 of 41
102 of 260
Slide 40 of 41
103 of 260
Chapter 7
Optimality
104 of 260
Slide 4 of 39
Efficiency
Idea:
Slide 5 of 39
Definition
Pareto Optimality
An equilibrium is Pareto optimal if there is no rearrangement of
production or consumption that makes the consumer better off.
The Pareto optimum is chosen by a social planner that:
1
105 of 260
Slide 6 of 39
subject to
C = zF (k, h l) G
Optimality implies:
UL (C, l)
UC (C, l)
C = zF (k, h l) G
zFN (k, h l) =
Slide 7 of 39
Pareto Optimality
Theorem
First Welfare Theorem First welfare theorem: a competitive equilibrium
is Pareto optimal.
Slide 8 of 39
106 of 260
Externalities (pollution)
Slide 9 of 39
Pareto Optimality
Slide 10 of 39
107 of 260
7.1
Optimal Taxation
108 of 260
Optimal Taxation
Slide 11 of 39
Optimal Taxation
General Principles
Slide 12 of 39
Federal Taxes
What is the profile of taxes in the data?
2. Federal Average Tax Rates by Income Groups
(individual+corporate+payroll+estate taxes)
80%
70%
1970
60%
2000
50%
40%
2005
30%
20%
10%
P99.99-100
P99.9-99.99
P99.5-99.9
P99-99.5
P95-99
P90-95
P80-90
P60-80
P40-60
P20-40
P0-20
0%
109 of 260
Optimal Taxation
In the rest of the lecture we will study marginal taxes on income.
Lets be concrete:
c = (1 |{z}
(z))
tax rate
w (h l)
| {z }
pretax income = z
Some definitions:
1
Marginal Tax Rate (MTR). The idea: MTR tells me what fraction
of one more dollar earned do I take home.
M T R = 0 (z).
Slide 14 of 39
Optimal Taxation
Slide 15 of 39
Marginal Rates
7-Feb-14
2014 Individual Income Tax Rates, Standard Deductions,
Is The U.S Federal Tax
Code
Progressive of Regressive ?
Personal Exemptions, and Filing Thresholds
$9,075
$36,900
$89,350
$186,350
$405,100
$406,750
and over
Marginal Rate
10%
15%
25%
28%
33%
35%
39.6%
$18,150
$73,800
$148,850
$226,850
$405,100
$457,600
and over
10%
15%
25%
28%
33%
35%
39.6%
110 of 260
Slide 16 of 39
$0
$12,950
$49,400
$127,550
$12,950
$49,400
$127,550
$206,600
10%
15%
25%
28%
Taxable Income
But not
over ---
Over ---
$0
$9,075
$36,900
$74,425
$9,075
$36,900
$74,425
$113,425
Marginal Rate
10%
15%
25%
28%
Optimal Taxation
Easy to administer.
Allows for redistribution of resources (progressive vs. regressive)
A major downside:
Slide 17 of 39
Slide 18 of 39
Uc (c, l) = 0
Ul (c, l) (1 )w = 0
(1 )w(h l) + c = 0
Ul (c, l)
= (1 )w
Uc (v, l)
Substituting
M RSl,c = (1 )M PN M RSl,c < M PN
The competitive equilibrium is not Pareto optimal!
Slide 19 of 39
111 of 260
Optimal Taxation
Easy to administer.
Allows for redistribution of resources (progressive vs. regressive)
A major downside:
Slide 20 of 39
Slide 21 of 39
An Utopian Goal
Suppose there are N individuals with incomes z1 < z2 < . . . < zN
Suppose the government cares equally about all of them.
Social welfare is:
W =
N
X
u(ci ),
i=1
(zi )zi = G.
i=1
112 of 260
What should taxes be?
Slide 22 of 39
N
X
i=1
s.t.
N
X
(zi )zi = G
i=1
General Principles
Equity Considerations.
+ For example the relative welfare weights of top earners v.s. the
rest.
Efficiency Considerations.
+ Behavioral responses from high taxes.
Slide 24 of 39
Behavioral Effects
In Data do we observe behavioral responses from taxation?
113 of 260
Source: Prescott (2004)
Slide 25 of 39
Slide 26 of 39
Taking Stock
Slide 27 of 39
Tax Reform
The goal is to now derive a simple formula for optimal taxes.
A Tax Reform: suppose the government increases taxes
by on individual earning more than z .
114 of 260
1
dz
z d(1 )
Online Survey!
Slide 29 of 39
Tax Reform
Any individual with income z > z changes taxes paid by:
(z z ).
Benefit +
z = e z
.
1
Combining the two effects so that cost and benefit are zero:
(z z ) e z
=0
Slide 30 of 39
Tax Reform
Disposable
Income
c=z-T(z)
[z-z*]
z*-T(z*)
z=-
z*
e z /(1- )
Pre-tax income z
Figure 1
Optimal Top Tax Rate Derivation
Slide 31 of 39
Note. The figure depicts the derivation of the optimal top tax rate *=1/(1+a e) by
115 of 260
Tax Reform
Combining the two effects so that cost and benefit are zero
(z z ) e z
1
Algebra...
=0
ez
1
=
z z
1
1+ae
Slide 32 of 39
1
dz
z d(1 )
1
1+ae
116 of 260
Slide 34 of 39
Slide 35 of 39
wh
+
2
2(1 )
hw
2
1 2
Slide 36 of 39
R( ) =
hw
2
1 2
+ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dxPVyieptwA
Slide 37 of 39
117 of 260
hw
2
1 2
Taking Stock
Some lessons learned from optimal taxation:
118 of 260
But not so high as being on the wrong side of the Laffer Curve.
Chapter 8
Growth
119 of 260
Slide 4 of 32
1980
2000
8
Log GDP per capita
10
12
FIGURE 1.2 Estimates of the distribution of countries according to log GDP per capita (PPP adjusted)
in 1960, 1980, and 2000.
Density of countries (weighted by population)
2000
1960
How did we get there:
11
10
8
Log GDP per capita
United States
10
12
8
Botswana
India
Nigeria
7
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
FIGURE 1.8 The evolution of income per capita in the United States, the United Kingdom, Spain,
Singapore, Brazil, Guatemala, South Korea, Botswana, Nigeria, and India, 19602000.
120 of 260
40 years? Why did Spain grow relatively rapidly for about 20 years but then slow down? Why
Source: Acemoglu
did Brazil(2008).
and Guatemala stagnate during the 1980s? What is responsible for the disastrous
growth performance of Nigeria?
Slide 6 of 32
Slide 7 of 32
Density of countries
1980
1960
2000
0.1
0.0
0.1
Average growth rate of GDP per worker
0.2
FIGURE 1.7 Estimates of the distribution of countries according to the growth rate of GDP per worker
(PPP adjusted) in 1960, 1980, and 2000.
grows rapidly, and by the mid-1990s it has become richer than both. South Korea has a similar
Source: Acemoglu
(2008).
trajectory, though it starts out poorer than Singapore and grows slightly less rapidly, so that by
Slide 8 of 32
the end of the sample it is still a little poorer than Spain. The other country that has grown very
rapidly is the African success story Botswana, which was extremely poor at the beginning
of the sample. Its rapid growth, especially after 1970, has taken Botswana to the ranks of the
middle-income countries by 2000.
The two Latin American countries in this picture, Brazil and Guatemala, illustrate the oftendiscussed Latin American economic malaise of the postwar era. Brazil starts out richer than
South Korea and Botswana and has a relatively rapid growth rate between 1960 and 1980.
But it experiences stagnation from 1980 on, so that by the end of the sample South Korea and
Botswana have become richer than Brazil. Guatemalas experience is similar but even more
bleak. Contrary to Brazil, there is little growth in Guatemala between 1960 and 1980 and no
growth between 1980 and 2000.
Finally, Nigeria and India start out at similar levels of income per capita as Botswana but
experience little growth until the 1980s. Starting in 1980, the Indian economy experiences
relatively rapid growth, though this has not been sufficient
tfor its income per capita to catch
up with the other nations in the figure. Finally,
t Nigeria,
0 in a pattern that is unfortunately all
too familiar in sub-Saharan Africa, experiences a contraction of its GDP per capita, so that in
2000 it is in fact poorer than it was in 1960.
The patterns shown in Figure 1.8 are what we would like to understand and explain. Why is
the United States richer in 1960 than other nations and able to grow at a steady pace thereafter?
How did Singapore, South Korea, and Botswana manage to grow at a relatively rapid pace for
A Useful Formula
ln 2
.7
70
ln 2
121 of 260
Slide 10 of 32
Historical Growth
Slide 11 of 32
Western Europe
Latin
America
Asia
Africa
6
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
FIGURE 1.11 The evolution of average GDP per capita in Western offshoots, Western Europe, Latin
America, Asia, and Africa, 10002000.
122 of 260
Source: Acemoglu
(2008).
terms takeoff or industrial revolution. This debate is again secondary to our purposes.
Slide 12 of 32
Long-term cycles.
Huge changes in relative rankings (Rome, China, Incas, Haiti).
Little difference between countries:
(Rich to poor ratio 2)
Slide 13 of 32
Taking Stock
So far the following questions have emerged:
1
Why was the world not growing before the 19th century?
123 of 260
Slide 15 of 32
Slide 16 of 32
18
1.6
TWN
0.06
KOR
CHN
THA
MYS
JPN
0.04
PRT
IRL
LKA
ESP
EGYDOM
IND
GHA
PAN
MUS
PAK
MAR
BRA
USA
TTO
GBR
CHL
MEX
TUR
COL
0.02
CRI
PRY
MWI
ZAF
ETH
UGA
0.00
NGA
ZWE
BEN
BFA BOLKENHND
GIN
ARG
NOR
FIN
NLD
DNK
CAN
SW E AUS
ECU
NZL
URYPHL
GTM
SLV
LUX
AUT
ISR
ITA GRC
BEL
ISL
FRA
IRN
CHE
PER
JAM
ZMB
VEN
JOR
NIC
0.0
0.1
0.2
Average investment rate, 19602000
0.3
0.4
FIGURE 1.15 The relationship between average growth of GDP per capita and average growth of
investments to GDP ratio, 19602000.
124 of 260
19
0.06
CHN
KOR
HKG
THA
MYS
SGP
0.04
PRT
LSO
PAK GHA
IND
EGY IDN
MUS
TUR
TUN
LKA
IRL
ESP
ITA
NPL
BEN
MLI
MOZ
GMB
BDI
0.00
MWI
DOM
BRA
IRN
CMR
GTM
COG
UGA
DZA
KEN
RWATGO
SEN
ZWE
GRC
FRA
PAN
SYR
0.02
BEL
ISR
FIN
NOR
GBR
ISL
PRY
COL MEXECU
ZAF
CRI
HND
SLV
BOL
ZMBJAM
JPN
AUT
NLD
CHL
TTO
PHL
URY
BRB
DNK
AUS
SW E
CAN
CHE
USA
ARG
NZL
PER
VEN
JOR
NER
NIC
0.02
0
4
6
8
Average years of schooling, 19602000
10
12
FIGURE 1.16 The relationship between average growth of GDP per capita and average years of
schooling, 19602000.
are likely driven, at least in part, by omitted factors affecting both investment and schooling
on the one hand and economic growth on the other.
We investigate the role of physical and human capital in economic growth further in
Chapter 3. One of the major points that emerges from the analysis in Chapter 3 is that focusing
only on physical and human capital is not sufficient. Both to understand the process of sustained
125 of 260
Slide 23 of 32
126 of 260
Slide 24 of 32
u00 (y)
E[(y y)2 ]
2
Slide 25 of 32
u00 (y)
2
=0 by definition
So that welfare is
W = H [u(y) +
E[(y y)2 ]
|
{z
}
=Variance of income
u00 (y)
V ar[y]]
2 1.2 Income and Welfare
satisfy an individual.
at the
end of the day, when one compares an advanced, rich country
Is increasing
inButlife
expectancy
00
Is decreasing
variance
of World
income
(recall
is negative!)
year. Consumption in
data the
also come
from the Penn
tables, while
data onulife expectancy
Slide 26 of 32
with a less-developed one, there are striking differences in the quality of life, standards of
income per capita in 2000 and consumption per capita and life expectancy at birth in the same
Welfare: Consumption
USA
LUX
HKG
CHEBMU
GBR
AUTARE
AUS
ISL
GER
CAN
BRB CYP
ITA
NLD
FRA
BEL
DNKNOR
JPN
BHS
IRL
TWN
SWE
KWT
PRI
NZL
ESP
MUS MLT
ISR
FIN SGP
GRC PRT
BHR MAC
SVN
TTO
OMN
ANT
KOR
ARG KNA
SW Z URY
QAT
CHLCZESAU
LBN
EST
CRI
HUN
LTU
BLR
SYC
POL
SVK
MEX
LVA
HRV
ZAF
TUN
LBY
GAB
PAN
DOM
BGR
PLW MYS
BRA
CPV
LCA
VEN
SLV
MKD
DJI
CUB
PRY
RUS
ROM
GRD
TUR
EGY
BRN
KAZ DMA
COL
ATG
THAVCT
BLZ
IRN
TON
GTMJAMNAM
ARM
GEO
FJI
BWA
TKM
PNG
MAR
NIC
WSM
PER
DZA
LKA
BIH
JOR
ECUUKR
ZWEPHL
GINBOL IDN
GNQ
ALB
UZB
GUY
MDA
HTI
FSM MDV
SUR
CMR
IRQ
PAK VUT
KGZ
AZE
HND
CIV
CHN
SCG
LSO
VNM
BGD
IND
SEN
SYR
SLB
GHA
MNG
STP
BEN
COM
MRT
PRK
KEN
MLI
RWA
MOZ
NPLTJK
CAF
GMB
SDN LAO
BFA
MWI
MDG
ZMB UGA KIR
TCD
AGO
TGO
NER
ETH
SLE
BDI
TZA NGACOG
ERI SOM BTN
AFG
KHM
YEM
GNB
14
13
12
11
ZAR
LBR
10
6
8
9
Log GDP per capita, 2000
10
11
FIGURE 1.5 The association between income per capita and consumption per capita in 2000. For a
definition of the abbreviations used in this and similar figures in the book, see http://unstats.un.org/unsd
/methods/m49/m49alpha.htm.
127 of 260
70
60
50
40
CRI
LUX
AGO
SLE ZMB
RWA
30
6
FIGURE 1.6
8
9
Log GDP per capita, 2000
10
11
The association between income per capita and life expectancy at birth in 2000.
high as 80 in(2008).
the richest countries, it is only between 40 and 50 in many sub-Saharan African
Source: Acemoglu
Slide 28 of 32
128 of 260
Source: Piketty and Saez (2009)
Slide 30 of 32
8.1
129 of 260
Malthus
Y = zF (|{z}
L , N)
land
Solow
Y = zF ( |{z}
K , N)
capital
N = labor
L = land
K = capital
z = productivity (TFP)
Note: new ingredient land
Slide 5 of 1
Key difference:
L = land is in fixed supply
K = can be accumulated over time
Slide 6 of 1
Malthusian Model
Technology: Y = zF (L, N )
assume constant return to scale
130 of 260
Slide 7 of 1
We have:
N0
=g
N
C
N
C
N
Slide 8 of 1
C
N
(A)
Slide 9 of 1
zF (L, N )
N
(B)
131 of 260
Slide 10 of 1
(A)
(B)
g zF
L
,1
N
=1
Slide 11 of 1
Equilibrium: Example
Let F (L, N ) = zL N 1 and g() = () , then
N 0 = z L N 1
recall < 1 and < 1.
Equilibrium exist: N
(intersection of 45 degree line and concave curve)
Slide 12 of 1
132 of 260
Slide 13 of 1
Slide 14 of 1
C1
N1
=1
(B)
C1 = z1 F (L, N1 )
If z1 z2 (with z1 < z2 ) then :
1
2
3
Slide 15 of 1
133 of 260
Slide 16 of 1
C
N
=1
(C)
C = zF (L, N )
Compare equation (B) with equation (C).
Slide 17 of 1
Slide 18 of 1
134 of 260
Slide 19 of 1
Slide 20 of 1
Slide 21 of 1
The Household
Exogenous population growth:
N 0 = (1 + n)N
n is the growth rate and n > 1
C + |{z}
S = |{z}
Y
Saving
Income
C = (1 s)Y
135 of 260
Slide 23 of 1
Slide 24 of 1
Capital tomorrow
136 of 260
= (1 d)
K
|{z}
+I
Capital today
Slide 25 of 1
Depreciation rate
.3119
.0660
.1072
.1179
.0314
.0825
Service life
7
25
16
14
31
20
Slide 26 of 1
The Firm
Maximizes profits:
Subject to
(K) = max Y wn I +
I,N
(K 0 )
| {z }
Profits Tomorrow
Y = zF (K, N )
And
K 0 = (1 d)K + I
Slide 27 of 1
137 of 260
Slide 28 of 1
Steady State
In Malthus steady state was N = N 0 = N
In Solow population always grows,
k0 = k = k
y0 = y = y
K
, 1 = f (k)
N
Slide 29 of 1
Kaldor Facts
K
N
K
Y
remains constant
Slide 30 of 1
138 of 260
Slide 31 of 1
Divide by N
K0 N 0
szF (K, N ) (1 d)K
=
+
N N0
N
N
Recall that N 0 = (1 + n)N
k 0 (1 + n) = szf (k) + (1 d)k
k1 increases to k2
Question: what happens to y1 ?
Slide 34 of 1
139 of 260
k1 decreases to k2
Slide 36 of 1
140 of 260
Growth
Slide 38 of 1
Growth Rates
Slide 39 of 1
Growth Rates
What is the growth rate of K, C, Y in steady state?
k0 = k
K0
K
=
0
N
N
so that
N0
K = (1 + n)K
N
growth rate is the population growth rate!
K0 =
141 of 260
Growth Rates
Question 1: how is consumption, output and
capital growing over time?
Answer 1:
Answer 2:
Slide 41 of 1
Sustaining Growth
To sustain growth over time we need something other than s and n: z!
142 of 260
Y
Y
= 1
F (K, N )
K N
Slide 43 of 1
Measuring K
Starting point to determine Kt+1 (at time t + 1) is:
Kt+1 = (1 d)Kt + It
If K1947 is set too high then Kt /Yt will decrease over time.
If K1947 is set too low then Kt /Yt will grow over time.
Slide 45 of 1
143 of 260
Slide 46 of 1
ypoor = zf (kpoor )
yrich = zf (krich )
Key equation:
Slide 47 of 1
Is this happening?
Slide 48 of 1
144 of 260
Here is an example of countries converging.
However looking across all countries...
Convergence: An Explanation
Barriers to investment
Slide 51 of 1
145 of 260
8.2
146 of 260
Slide 2 of 14
Endogenous Growth
Slide 3 of 14
Schooling Years
147 of 260
19
0.06
CHN
KOR
HKG
THA
MYS
SGP
0.04
LKA
PRT
LSO
PAK GHA
IND
EGY IDN
TUR
TUN
IRL
ESP
ITA
MUS
0.02
NPL
BEN
MLI
MOZ
GMB
BDI
0.00
MWI
DOM
BRA
IRN
ZWE
CMR
GTM
COG
UGA
DZA
KEN
RWATGO
SEN
GRC
FRA
PAN
SYR
AUT
BEL
ISR
FIN
NOR
GBR
ISL
PRY
COL MEXECU
ZAF
CRI
HND
SLV
BOL
ZMBJAM
JPN
NLD
CHL
TTO
PHL
URY
BRB
DNK
AUS
SW E
CAN
CHE
USA
ARG
NZL
PER
VEN
JOR
NER
NIC
0.02
0
4
6
8
Average years of schooling, 19602000
10
12
FIGURE 1.16 The relationship between average growth of GDP per capita and average years of
schooling, 19602000.
Slide 5 of 14
are likely driven, at least in part, by omitted factors affecting both investment and schooling
on the one hand and economic growth on the other.
We investigate the role of physical and human capital in economic growth further in
Chapter 3. One of the major points that emerges from the analysis in Chapter 3 is that focusing
only on physical and human capital is not sufficient. Both to understand the process of sustained
economic growth and to account for large cross-country differences in income, we also need
to understand why societies differ in the efficiency with which they use their physical and
human capital. Economists normally use the shorthand expression technology to capture
factors other than physical and human capital that affect economic growth and performance. It
is therefore important to remember that variations in technology across countries include not
only differences in production techniques and in the quality of machines used in production
but also disparities in productive efficiency (see in particular Chapter 21 on differences in
productive efficiency resulting from the organization of markets and from market failures).
A detailed study of technology (broadly construed) is necessary for understanding both the
worldwide process of economic growth and cross-country differences. The role of technology
in economic growth is investigated in Chapter 3 and later chapters.
Schooling: Spending
Country
% of GDP
Yemen
9.5%
Mongolia
9%
Kenya
7%
Switzerland (U.S) 5.8% (5.7%)
1.7 From Correlates to Fundamental Causes
Italy
4.7%
The correlates of economic growth, such as physical capital, human capital, and technology, is
Zambia
our first topic of study. But these are only proximate causes of2%
economic growth and economic
success (even if we convince
ourselves that there is an element
of causality in the correlations
Ecuador
1%
Source: United Nations
What can we learn from the above?
Slide 6 of 14
Endogenous Growth:
The relation between z and education
148 of 260
Slide 7 of 14
Human Capital:
The stock of skills and education that workers have at a point in time
Properties:
1
It grows
Is non-rivalrous
Slide 8 of 14
There is no leisure:
Workers divide their time between work
and human capital accumulation.
Let N denote time at work. (1 N ) time at school.
There is no capital.
Slide 9 of 14
Budget constraint:
C = |{z}
w
Wage
N
H}
| {z
Effective labor
H = b(1 N )H
b is efficiency of human capital accumulation (quality of schools)
149 of 260
Slide 10 of 14
Equilibrium wage is z.
Slide 11 of 14
H0
1 = b(1 N ) 1
H
C0
zN H 0
H0
1=
1=
1=
C
zN H
H
= |{z}
b (1 N ) 1
| {z }
efficiency
Slide 12 of 14
intensity
150 of 260
Slide 13 of 14
Increase schooling
+ http://www.worldbank.org/education
Slide 14 of 14
151 of 260
Chapter 9
Dynamic Model
9.1
Forecasting: Part 2
152 of 260
Slide 2 of 22
This Lecture
Leading Indicators
Application to Employment Forecasting:
1
Vacancies
Slide 3 of 22
153 of 260
Slide 4 of 22
Leading Indicators
Setting It = {zn }t1
n=1 is particularly useful if zt1 predicts xt .
In this case we will call zt a leading indicator of xt .
Recall that a leading indicator (zt in our case) is a variable that
over the cycle anticipates the changes of another variable (xt ).
Examples:
1
Earnings Dividends;
?? Employment;
?? GDP.
Slide 5 of 22
A Simple Model
xt+1 = b0 + b1 zt
+ Goal: find b0 and b1 .
Slide 6 of 22
A General Model
The previous model only consider 1 explanatory variable z.
We can generalize:
154 of 260
Slide 7 of 22
(1)
Slide 8 of 22
Appendix: Durbin-Watson
PT
t=2 (t t1 )
PT 2
t=1 t
d determines how correlated are the error over time. If errors are
correlated then one could used past errors to reduce future errors.
Slide 9 of 22
yt +b2 Tt
|{z}
|{z}
Income
Transfers
155 of 260
Slide 11 of 22
The CES releases monthly, next releases are April 4th and May 2nd .
Every month shortly (few days) before the CES report, ADP
releases the National Employment Report.
156 of 260
Slide 13 of 22
The ADP series is released only few days the CES series.
Other leading indicators are available. A popular one: job openings
The idea is simple to fill a job, a job must first become available.
Job openings are published in the JOLTS
(Job openings and labor turnover survey)
Slide 15 of 22
157 of 260
Job opening anticipates the behavior of payroll employment.
Slide 16 of 22
Results
The previous two graphs are displayed as:
differences from a year ago.
We find:
b0 = 75.11;
b1 = 0.186;
d = 0.5
Slide 18 of 22
Truck Sales
158 of 260
2
Heavy trucks are trucks with more than 14,000 pounds gross vehicle weight.
Slide 19 of 22
Slide 20 of 22
Slide 21 of 22
Historical Relationship
159 of 260
9.2
The Household
160 of 260
http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/press/monetary/20140319a.htm
Slide 2 of 44
Slide 3 of 44
Forward Guidance?
In January:
In March:
Committee currently anticipates that, even after employment and inflation are
near mandate-consistent levels, economic conditions may, for some time,
warrant keeping the target federal funds rate below levels the Committee views as
normal in the longer run.
161 of 260
Online Survey!
This year
Next year
Slide 5 of 44
Slide 6 of 44
162 of 260
Slide 7 of 44
No intermediaries
Slide 8 of 44
y0
t0
t
1+r
1+r
Slide 9 of 44
163 of 260
u(c) + u(c0 )
(1 + r)c + c0 = we(1 + r)
Subject to
Slide 11 of 44
= (1 + r)
M RSc,c0
= 1+r
Intuition:
Give up one consumption today (valued at uc0 (c0 )) for (1 + r) units
of consumption tomorrow (valued at uc0 (c0 ) and discounted by )
Slide 12 of 44
(a) Lender
164 of 260
Slide 13 of 44
(b) Borrower
Slide 14 of 44
1
1+r .
(1)
Slide 15 of 44
165 of 260
Slide 23 of 44
Slide 24 of 44
Life-time budget
166 of 260
Slide 25 of 44
G+
T0
G0
=T+
1+r
1+r
Ricardian Equivalence
Slide 26 of 44
Ricardian Equivalence
Punchline: the timing of taxes is irrelevant
y0
t0
=y+
t+
1 + r}
1+r
| {z
|
{z
}
...of income
...of taxes
Slide 27 of 44
167 of 260
Slide 28 of 44
Slide 30 of 44
168 of 260
Slide 31 of 44
It cannot be defaulted on
In data...
Slide 33 of 44
Bonds: Maturity
In data we have different maturities:
*#"'1/#0)2+"34)5/#6")7-#).'#$8)9:;)9<=9)
'#$"
'"
!"#$"%&'(")
&#$"
&"
%#$"
%"
!#$"
!"
%"()"
'"()"
*"()"
%"+,"
&"+,"
'"+,"
$"+,"
-"+,"
%!"+,"
&!"+,"
'!"+,"
*+,")&-).'&/#+&0))
Source: http://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/data-chart-center/interestrates/Pages/TextView.aspx?data=yield
Slide 34 of 44
169 of 260
Bonds: Maturity
return is the same even if you had rolled over bonds of shorter
maturities
Let rm = return of bond of maturity m
(1 + rm )m = (1 + r) (1 + r)
{z
}
|
m times
Slide 35 of 44
Bonds: Default
In data we have bonds with different default risk:
Source: http://markets.ft.com/RESEARCH/Markets/Government-Bond-Spreads
Bonds: Default
170 of 260
Slide 37 of 44
ri
|{z}
return on bonds of i
r
|{z}
return on US bonds
Slide 38 of 44
Comparative Statics
Slide 39 of 44
Recall wei = yi +
y0
1+r
t0
1+r
Slide 40 of 44
171 of 260
Slide 42 of 44
172 of 260
9.3
The Government
173 of 260
Slide 16 of 44
s=ytc
(y t) (y 0 t0 )
2+r
Slide 17 of 44
Data on Saving
174 of 260
Slide 18 of 44
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Tangible assets
Real estate
Households (2,3)
Nonprofit organizations
Equipment and software owned by
nonprofit organizations (4)
Consumer durable goods (4)
2006
2007
2008
2009
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q1
Q2
56744.9
63506.2
70987.5
76749.0
78228.8
75868.6
74945.9
72339.4
67134.0
65244.0
67207.9
21437.7
24270.7
27719.1
28724.2
27525.6
26863.9
26541.9
26051.2
25177.0
24660.1
24847.1
17599.0
16170.3
1428.7
20214.4
18629.4
1585.0
23458.4
21427.7
2030.7
24259.6
21948.2
2311.4
22880.2
20477.4
2402.8
22154.7
19803.5
2351.2
21785.0
19538.7
2246.2
21261.5
19036.3
2225.3
20397.7
18317.1
2080.5
19869.0
17948.6
1920.4
20025.9
18272.0
1753.9
3
4
5
160.7
3678.0
173.2
3883.1
183.7
4077.0
196.5
4268.1
207.9
4437.5
210.4
4498.9
214.0
4542.9
218.1
4571.5
220.9
4558.5
221.0
4570.1
220.5
4600.8
6
7
35307.2
39235.5
43268.4
48024.8
50703.1
49004.7
48404.0
46288.2
41957.0
40583.8
42360.8
Deposits
Foreign deposits
Checkable deposits and currency
Time and savings deposits
Money market fund shares
5350.4
52.1
399.1
3939.0
960.2
5742.5
57.5
370.3
4410.6
904.1
6153.6
59.9
256.8
4887.6
949.2
6779.0
65.2
236.4
5363.0
1114.5
7381.3
81.0
156.9
5796.7
1346.8
7579.1
74.5
87.8
5958.9
1457.9
7420.3
68.3
98.5
5859.8
1393.7
7566.4
63.9
64.7
5991.7
1446.1
7827.4
59.8
236.7
5949.2
1581.7
7848.9
55.7
241.7
5988.8
1562.7
7760.2
50.6
300.1
5913.8
1495.7
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
2755.2
105.9
438.6
203.8
234.8
421.2
703.8
964.2
3.1
118.5
3075.8
136.1
532.2
204.4
327.8
390.0
742.4
1135.6
5.9
133.6
3426.8
164.2
507.5
205.1
302.4
488.3
821.0
1294.1
8.7
143.0
3553.5
187.7
433.1
202.4
230.7
412.6
871.8
1517.7
8.3
122.4
4113.4
149.7
252.3
196.4
55.9
689.8
895.9
2001.7
17.4
106.5
4077.9
117.5
322.1
195.3
126.8
657.0
883.3
1971.0
20.1
107.0
4138.8
82.7
368.1
194.9
173.2
675.5
894.5
1979.9
22.3
115.8
4218.5
39.1
386.8
194.2
192.6
820.1
910.1
1919.2
27.5
115.7
4054.5
10.4
240.0
194.0
46.0
711.3
938.0
2010.9
27.9
116.0
4536.2
7.3
576.4
193.9
382.5
439.6
954.5
2415.4
28.5
114.5
4326.6
8.9
605.9
193.5
412.4
129.5
996.8
2443.6
29.2
112.7
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
6749.9
2904.3
475.4
1013.2
9718.9
5838.7
501.3
7491.0
3417.4
578.3
1060.4
10635.5
6680.9
553.8
7999.5
3839.3
575.3
1082.6
11373.7
8208.9
608.7
9488.0
4387.6
655.7
1163.7
12696.2
8655.0
646.1
9453.0
4832.0
866.4
1201.5
13375.9
8767.3
712.2
8759.6
4575.2
984.5
1187.2
12566.7
8548.5
725.9
8449.1
4662.8
992.1
1196.4
12476.1
8335.1
733.5
7442.0
4111.1
998.6
1197.7
11832.5
8170.3
751.3
5878.7
3444.7
742.7
1179.8
10442.6
7618.4
768.2
5150.3
3254.7
667.0
1181.1
9913.8
7266.7
765.1
6266.3
3740.5
649.2
1197.6
10656.3
6995.7
768.4
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
9842.8
11012.1
12164.2
13414.0
14318.1
14416.4
14368.2
14514.8
14216.9
14102.5
14068.0
31
9482.6
6871.9
2102.5
178.3
49.8
118.7
161.4
10552.4
7819.3
2219.5
188.6
26.7
119.0
179.2
11723.1
8855.3
2319.8
205.1
36.4
119.0
187.4
12899.2
9832.8
2415.0
226.9
86.4
123.8
214.3
13754.2
10485.2
2551.9
249.5
99.7
127.0
240.8
13807.5
10547.9
2529.6
252.3
104.9
128.0
244.9
13828.9
10544.3
2555.6
261.6
89.2
129.7
248.4
13860.9
10503.5
2588.0
265.2
121.4
130.7
252.1
13794.8
10430.7
2592.1
269.6
117.7
133.2
251.5
13709.6
10431.0
2517.0
273.0
104.0
133.5
251.0
13661.8
10401.7
2475.5
281.9
118.5
134.0
250.1
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
Financial assets
2005
9
10
11
12
13
31
Slide 19 of 44
Assets
2004
Liabilities
Credit market instruments
Home mortgages (8)
Consumer credit
Municipal securities (9)
Bank loans n.e.c.
Other loans and advances
Commercial mortgages (9)
Security credit
Trade payables (9)
Deferred and unpaid
life insurance premiums
182.5
156.8
264.0
173.3
232.4
186.3
292.1
199.9
325.5
214.5
365.3
218.4
291.5
222.2
402.3
226.2
164.8
230.2
134.6
231.8
147.6
233.8
39
40
20.9
22.5
22.4
22.8
23.9
25.2
25.5
25.3
27.0
26.5
24.8
41
42
Net worth
46902.1
52494.0
58823.3
63334.9
63910.6
61452.2
60577.8
57824.7
52917.1
51141.5
53139.9
42
43
44
45
46
Memo:
Replacement-cost value of structures:
Residential
Households
Nonprofit organizations
Nonresidential (nonprofits)
10679.9
10513.7
166.1
955.5
12030.3
11848.9
181.4
1058.3
13475.1
13275.9
199.3
1174.8
14440.6
14229.3
211.3
1279.5
14643.0
14430.3
212.7
1352.6
14587.2
14375.4
211.7
1356.9
14523.6
14313.0
210.6
1368.9
14359.8
14151.6
208.2
1394.2
13981.2
13778.7
202.5
1424.0
13776.4
13577.1
199.4
1412.1
13831.2
13631.3
199.9
1379.2
43
44
45
46
8377.8
8889.4
9277.3
9915.7
10403.1
10610.4
10966.7
10849.3
10799.1
10765.4
10902.9
47
559.8
590.5
634.1
638.7
614.3
579.2
552.4
533.0
490.0
475.1
487.4
48
9298.4
10810.1
12572.5
12115.4
9992.2
9255.6
8994.4
8532.8
7886.4
7517.7
7870.4
49
57.5
58.0
58.7
55.2
48.8
46.7
46.0
44.8
43.1
41.9
43.1
50
47
48
49
50
International Rates
Figure 12
International Household Saving Ratios (quarterly)
Percent
20
15
10
Australia
Canada
United Kingdom
Japan
United States
France
Germany
5
1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006
175 of 260
consumption boom that has at the same time
characterized the behavior of U.S. households.
A third argument refers mainly to FoF estiSlide 21 of 44
National Savings
At a national level:
S
|{z}
updated through
03/05/14
Sp
|{z}
Private Saving
National Saving
Sg
|{z}
Government
NationalSaving
Economic Trends
20
15
10
5
0
BOCA
-5
-10
88
88
89
89
90
90
91
91
92
92
93
93
94
94
95
95
96
96
97
97
98
98
99
99
00
00
01
01
02
02
03
03
04
04
05
05
06
06
07
07
08
08
09
09
10
10
11
11
20
30
12
12
13
13
14
Compounded
annual rates of change
Percent change from year ago, excluding aircraft
Source:
http://research.stlouisfed.org/publications/net/page15.pdf
Equipment
Investment
20
15
10
Slide 2210 of 44
Orders
-10
-20
0
-30
-5
-40
18628
2011
18993
2012
19359
2013
19724
2009
18263
2010
18628
2011
18993
2012
19359
2013
19724
25
25
20
20
15
15
10
10
-5
-5
-10
2014
20089
-10
18628
2011
18993
2012
19359
2013
19724
18628
2011
18993
2012
19359
2013
25
1.2
20
1.1
15
1.0
10
0.9
0.8
0.7
-5
0.6
-10
0.5
0.55
0.50
0.45
0.40
0.35
Housing Starts
(left scale)
0.30
0.25
0.4
18628
2011
18993
Research Division
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
2012
19359
19724
-15
176 of 260
17898
2013
19724
18993
0.20
2012
19359
2013
19724
2014
20089
15
9.4
Elastic Labor
177 of 260
Slide 2 of 18
Firms
Investment decision
Slide 3 of 18
Consumption Today
Let consumption depend on wealth and interest rate: C(we, r)
Q: What happens when we change wealth and interest rates?
Effects on the consumption of goods:
178 of 260
Slide 4 of 18
c0
w0 (h l0 ) + 0 T
= w(h l) + T +
1+r
1+r
Slide 5 of 18
Optimality conditions:
Slide 6 of 18
179 of 260
9.5
The Firm
180 of 260
The Firm
Slide 8 of 18
US Firms: Data
2000
1,161
364
329
35
797
751
46
20
All companies
2005 2008
1,145 1,374
402
562
366
523
36
39
743
812
701
765
42
47
18
20
2009
1,090
448
421
27
642
607
35
17
Industry
Total
. . . . . . . . . . . . (X)
Slide
9 expenditures
of 18
Forestry, fishing, and agricultural
services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mining . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Utilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Manufacturing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Durable goods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nondurable goods . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Wholesale trade. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Retail trade . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Transportation and warehousing . . . .
Information. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Finance and insurance . . . . . . . . . . .
Real estate and rental and leasing . .
2000 2009
1,090 1,015
113115
21
22
23
3133
321, 327, 33
31, 322326
42
4445
4849
51
52
53
1
43
61
25
215
134
81
34
70
60
160
134
92
Online Survey!
2
101
102
20
156
77
79
25
58
56
88
100
73
NAICS
code
Industry
Professional, scientific, and technical
services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Management of companies and
enterprises. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Admin/support waste mgt/remediation
services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Educational services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Health care and social assistance . . . . .
Arts, entertainment, and recreation . . . .
Accommodation and food services . . . .
Other services (except public
administration) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Structure and equipment expenditures
serving multiple industry categories . .
2000 2009
54
34
55
56
61
62
71
72
18
18
52
19
26
19
28
79
16
26
81
21
29
(X)
2
Q: which industry does the bulk of investment?
27
X Not applicable.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2009 Annual Capital Expenditures Survey, February 2011, <http://www.census.gov/econ
/aces/>, and earlier reports.
Peak
Manufacturing
Month
February . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
November . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
July . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
August . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
April . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
December . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
November . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
January . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
July . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
July . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
March. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
December . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Year
1945
1948
1953
1957
1960
1969
1973
1980
1981
1990
2001
2007
Trough
Month
October . . . . . .
October . . . . . .
May . . . . . . . . .
April . . . . . . . . .
February . . . . .
November . . . .
March. . . . . . . .
July . . . . . . . . .
November . . . .
March. . . . . . . .
November . . . .
June . . . . . . . . .
Year
1945
1949
Finance and Insurance
1954
Health Care
Slide1 Previous
10 of 18
trough: June 1938. 2 Previous peak: May 1937.
1958
1961
1970
1975
1980
1982
1991
2001
2009
Contraction
(Peak to
trough)
8
11
10
8
10
11
16
6
16
8
8
18
Expansion
(Previous
trough to
peak)
1
80
37
45
39
24
106
36
58
12
92
120
73
11
59
Length of cycle
Trough from
Peak from
previous
previous
trough
peak
1
2
88
93
48
45
55
56
47
49
34
32
117
116
52
47
64
74
28
18
100
108
128
128
91
81
73
66
181 of 260
797
751
46
20
US Firms: Data
743
701
42
18
812
765
47
20
642
607
35
17
752
718
34
19
694
665
29
18
765
728
37
19
602
577
25
17
45
32
12
(Z)
49
37
13
(Z)
47
37
10
1
40
30
10
1
Industry
Total expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . .
Forestry, fishing, and agricultural
services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mining . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Utilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Manufacturing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Durable goods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nondurable goods . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Wholesale trade. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Retail trade . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Transportation and warehousing . . . .
Information. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Finance and insurance . . . . . . . . . . .
Real estate and rental and leasing . .
2000 2009
1,090 1,015
(X)
113115
21
22
23
3133
321, 327, 33
31, 322326
42
4445
4849
51
52
53
1
43
61
25
215
134
81
34
70
60
160
134
92
2
101
102
20
156
77
79
25
58
56
88
100
73
NAICS
code
Industry
Professional, scientific, and technical
services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Management of companies and
enterprises. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Admin/support waste mgt/remediation
services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Educational services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Health care and social assistance . . . . .
Arts, entertainment, and recreation . . . .
Accommodation and food services . . . .
Other services (except public
administration) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Structure and equipment expenditures
serving multiple industry categories . .
2000 2009
54
34
55
27
5
56
61
62
71
72
18
18
52
19
26
19
28
79
16
26
81
21
29
(X)
X Not applicable.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2009 Annual Capital Expenditures Survey, February 2011, <http://www.census.gov/econ
/aces/>, and earlier reports.
[A trough is the low point of a business cycle; a peak is the high point. Contraction, or recession, is the period from peak to
subsequent trough; expansion is the period from trough to subsequent peak. Business cycle reference dates are determined by
the National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.]
The Firm
Month
February . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
November . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
July . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
August . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
April . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
December . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
November . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
January . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
July . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
July . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
March. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
December . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Year
1945
1948
1953
1957
1960
1969
1973
1980
1981
1990
2001
2007
Trough
Month
October . . . . . .
October . . . . . .
May . . . . . . . . .
April . . . . . . . . .
February . . . . .
November . . . .
March. . . . . . . .
July . . . . . . . . .
November . . . .
March. . . . . . . .
November . . . .
June . . . . . . . . .
Year
1945
1949
1954
1958
1961
1970
1975
1980
1982
1991
2001
2009
Contraction
(Peak to
trough)
8
11
10
8
10
11
16
6
16
8
8
18
Expansion
(Previous
trough to
peak)
1
80
37
45
39
24
106
36
58
12
92
120
73
11
59
Length of cycle
Trough from
Peak from
previous
previous
trough
peak
1
2
88
93
48
45
55
56
47
49
34
32
117
116
52
47
64
74
28
18
100
108
128
128
91
81
Y = zF (K, N )
73
Output tomorrow: Y 0 = z 0 F (K 0 , N 0 )
66
K 0 = (1 d)K + I
Slide 12 of 18
The Firm
0
1+r
Profits today: = Y wN I
Profits tomorrow: 0 = Y 0 w0 N 0 +
(1 d)K 0
| {z }
Liquidation Value
182 of 260
Slide 13 of 18
Slide 14 of 18
N,N ,I
z 0 F (K 0 , N 0 ) w0 N 0 + (1 d)K 0
1+r
z
}|
{
z 0 FK ((1 d)K + I, N ) + (1 d)
1 +
=0
1+r
so that
z 0 F (K 0 , N 0 ) d = r
| K {z
}
0
M PK
z 0 FK ((1 d)K + I1 ) d = r1
183 of 260
Slide 16 of 18
Slide 17 of 18
K0
N0
1
=r+d
z0
I=
r+d
1
1
N 0 (1 d)K
184 of 260
9.6
Equilibrium
185 of 260
Experiments/ Policy
1
Production shocks:
Change in productivity
Change in capital stock
Slide 3 of 52
Slide 4 of 52
186 of 260
G0 + (1 + r)B = T 0
0d
=N
0s
Y 0 = C 0 + I 0 + G0
Equilibrium: 2 Markets
Slide 7 of 52
187 of 260
Slide 9 of 52
Slide 10 of 52
Changing r:
dY d
dC(we, r) dI(r)
=
+
<0
dr
| dr
{z } | dr
{z }
<0
<0
188 of 260
Slide 11 of 52
Graphical Equilibrium
Slide 13 of 52
2 Questions
189 of 260
Slide 14 of 52
Online Survey!
Between $1 and $2
More than $2
Slide 15 of 52
Slide 16 of 52
If G then T so we
If we then N s
So zF (K, N s ) , Supply curve shifts to the right!
190 of 260
If z then zF (K, N )
If zF (K, N ) then N d
Supply curve shifts to the right!
Slide 17 of 52
Slide 18 of 52
Y d C + I + G
Slide 19 of 52
Impacting C and I:
1
increase in future T F P :
I
I
191 of 260
Slide 20 of 52
Slide 21 of 52
Formally:
dC
= MPC we
dwe
Slide 22 of 52
consumption
disposable income
!"#$%&#'($)*#+,-./'.)'0)+,12#'
!"('$
!"(&$
!"(%$
!"($
!"##$
!"#'$
!"#&$
!"#%$
!"#$
)(&#$
192 of 260
)(*#$
)('#$
)(+#$
)(##$
)((#$
%!!#$
d
Y
| {z }
change in wealth
Y d
change
z
}|
{ Additional
z}|{
d
Y +{z
C
= MPC
|
} +I + G =
Total consumption change
1
(C + I + G)
1
MPC
| {z }
The Multiplier
Experiments
Slide 25 of 52
Experiments
Temporary Increase in G
Permanent Increase In G
193 of 260
Slide 26 of 52
Algorithm
To solve these exercises follow these steps:
1) Identify effect of change on consumer, government, firm
(these are exogenous changes, not changes due to r or w)
2) Identify first tentative equilibrium in labor market
3) Identify effect on output supply curve
4) Identify effect on output demand curve
5) Determine changes in Y and r in the goods market.
6) Using result in 2) and change in r determine change in N and w
7) In 5) and 6), specify which result are determinate and
which are indeterminate
Slide 27 of 52
1
(C + G + I)
1 MPC
G > 0, I = 0 also C =
dC
dwe
|{z}
= MPC (G)
Effect of taxes
4) So that:
Y d =
Slide 28 of 52
(MPC G + G)
= G > 0
1 MPC
194 of 260
Increase in G: summary
Important: Y < G
(Government multiplier < 1,
for every dollar spent GDP goes up by less than a dollar)
Slide 30 of 52
+ For a quick summary look at this discussion between Boldrin DeLong starting at 42:20
http://tinyurl.com/BoldrinDelong
Slide 31 of 52
1 qrt
4qrts
8 qrts
12 qrts
20 qrts
0.20
0.44
0.53
0.31
2.08
0.37
6.19
0.29
3.80
0.33
Maximum
9.59 (qrt 14)
0.44 (qrt 1)
This table shows the present value multipliers for a deficit financed tax cut policy shock and for a deficit
spending fiscal policy shock. The multipliers given are the median multipliers in both cases.
4.3
The impulse
for a deficit
tax(2005)
cut fiscal policy shock are shown in
Taken
from:responses
Mountford
andfinanced
Uhlig
Figure 8. The shock is designed so that tax revenues fall by 1% and government spending
remains unchanged for four quarters following the shock. The responses look very similar
to a mirror image of the responses to the basic government revenue shock in Figure 3.
Thus the tax cut stimulates output, consumption and investment significantly with the
eect peaking after about three years. The eect on prices is initially negative but
Slide 32 of 52
subsequently positive following the rise in output.
195 of 260
Maximum Multiplier
Minimum Multiplier
Median
Multiplier
Confidence Interval
16th,84th Quantiles
Median
Multiplier
Confidence Interval
16th,84th Quantiles
Deficit Spending
1.36
lag 9
0.75, 1.59
lag 1, lag 24
-0.73
at lag 24
-2.73, -0.22
lag 24, lag 5
Balanced Budget
0.45
lag 3
0.18, 1.59
lag 1, lag 24
-3.64
at lag 11
-6.39, -2.26
lag 23, lag 8
Tax Cut
3.45
lag 13
3.11, 4.65
lag 9, lag 14
-0.11
at lag 1
-0.40, 0.28
lag 1, lag 1
Deficit Spending
In first year
0.71
lag 4
0.56, 0.89
lag 4, lag 4
0.03
at lag 3
-0.25, 0.17
lag 4, lag 1
Balanced Budget
In first year
0.31
at lag 1
0.05, 0.71
lag 4, lag 1
-0.83
at lag 1
-1.39, -0.60
lag 4, lag 2
These statistics relate to the distribution of the maximum and minimum impact multiplier effects of each fiscal shock. For each draw the maximum and minimum fiscal multiplier is calculated and the 16th, 50th and 84th percentiles of these results are displayed. The multiplier
statistic is calculated in terms of the initial, lag 0, fiscal shock as follows: multiplier for GDP
GDP response
=
/(Average Fiscal variable share of GDP).
Fiscal shock at Lag 0
and minimum multipliers of the two spending shocks in the first year after the shock.
In this case we now get the result that the deficit spending shocks minimum multiplier
is insignificantly dierent from zero but that for the balanced budget spending shock is
still significantly negative.
4.8
Policy Conclusions
An important lesson one can draw from the results is that while a deficit-financed expenditure stimulus is possible, the eventual costs are likely to be much higher than the
immediate benefits. For suppose that government spending is increased by two percent,
financed by increasing the deficit: this results, using the median values from Table 5,
19
Slide 34 of 52
Change in Productivity
196 of 260
Slide 35 of 52
1
(C + G + I) = 0
1 MPC
Change in Productivity
Change in Productivity
Summarizing:
Slide 37 of 52
197 of 260
Slide 39 of 52
Slide 40 of 52
Summarizing in equilibrium:
I increases
Y ambiguous, r goes up
w decreases; N ambiguous (most likely down)
198 of 260
Slide 41 of 52
Japan: Data
Slide 42 of 52
Slide 43 of 52
199 of 260
Slide 44 of 52
1
(C + G + I)
1 MPC
I > 0 firm anticipate higher return to capital tomorrow
C = M P C Y 0 > 0
Y d =
Interest rate go up
Slide 45 of 52
Slide 46 of 52
Punchline:
I goes up
N and Y go up
r goes up
w goes down
200 of 260
Slide 47 of 52
Permanent Increase in G
(taxes) = G +
G
1+r
Slide 48 of 52
Permanent Increase in G
Recall:
1
(C + G + I)
1 MPC
Y d =
and C = M P C (income)
G
1+r
Slide 49 of 52
Permanent Increase in G
Y d =
MPC
Y 0
1+r
G
1+r
1 MPC
+ G + I
Y d = G
201 of 260
Slide 50 of 52
Permanent Increase in G
Q: Does r change?
A: NO
Slide 51 of 52
Permanent Increase in G
Punchline:
C unchanged
I unchanged
N and Y go up
r unchanged
w goes down
Important: Y = G
(Government multiplier = 1)
Slide 52 of 52
202 of 260
Chapter 10
Credit Imperfections
203 of 260
Online Survey!
Q: In your opinion what is the biggest shortcoming in our
modeling of credit markets?
A: Your answer here: http://tinyurl.com/73240-ales
1
Slide 3 of 38
Slide 4 of 38
204 of 260
Slide 5 of 38
Definition
Credit Imperfection: Any type of obstacle, either technological or
institutional that prevents an optimal level of trade in the credit market.
We will look into two types of credit market imperfections:
Asymmetric information
Limited commitment
Slide 6 of 38
Asymmetric Information
In the credit market: a borrower knows more about his or her own
credit worthiness than do potential borrowers.
Slide 7 of 38
205 of 260
Slide 8 of 38
Good borrowers:
1 + rD
1
a
Slide 10 of 38
206 of 260
http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/categories/119
Slide 11 of 38
Slide 12 of 38
Slide 13 of 38
207 of 260
Suppose that:
Key assumption:
the interest rate on government debt is the lending rate r1
Slide 15 of 38
Slide 16 of 38
208 of 260
Slide 17 of 38
Definition
Collateral: An asset owned by the borrower that the lender has a
right to seize if the borrower defaults on the loan.
Housing as collateral
Suppose household owns a house of value H:
Value of the house is p H. Where p is the housing price level
House are illiquid assets. Cannot be sold quickly to finance current
consumption
y 0 t0 + p H
1+r
Repayment
p H
| {z }
Value of collateral
Since c = y t s, we have
cyt+
pH
1+r
209 of 260
Source:
http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/SPCS20RSA?rid=199
Slide 22 of 38
Financial Intemidiation
210 of 260
Slide 23 of 38
What is Happening?
!" Speci"cally, when we remove South Africa and Switzerland the coe$cient on Private Credit
rises to 4.72 and the t-statistics equals 3.65 while the GMM estimate satis"es the litany of diagnostic
tests. Similarly, when the seven additional countries are removed, the Private Credit enters with
a value of 4.53 and a t-statistic of 3.91, while passing the diagnostic tests.
!# For the COMMERCIAL-CENTRAL BANK regressions, Haiti's level of "nancial develop-
is much less than predicted by its country characteristics. Nonetheless, removing Haiti
Septemberment
2007:
increases the estimated coe$cient on COMMERCIAL-CENTRAL BANK to 13.4 (with a t-statistic
of 3.35). Moreover, when removing other potential outliers such as Korea, Niger, and Peru, the
results are unchanged (coe$cient estimate of 9.6 on Commercial-Central Bank and a t-statistic of
2.44). When examining the GMM residuals, Niger, Honduras, Jamaica, Korea, Mauritius, Pakistan,
Senegal, and Taiwan are more than two-standard deviations from zero. Removing these countries
produces an estimated coe$cient of 7.71 on COMMERCIAL-CENTRAL BANK, with a t-statistic
of 2.92, and the regression passes the battery of diagnostic tests discussed in the text. In terms of
LIQUID LIABILITIES, the robustness checks produce similar results. The partial scatter plots
point to Niger and Korea as potential outliers. Removing these countries does not a!ect the results
(The estimated coe$cient becomes 2.24 with a t-statistic of 2.71). Similarly, when using the GMM
residual criteria, Korea, Jamaica, Switzerland, Taiwan, and Zaire fall more than two-standard
deviations away from zero. Removing these countries produces a coe$cient estimate of 2.63 on
LIQUID LIABILITIES, with a t-statistic of 4.24, and a regression that passes the various diagnostic
tests used in this paper.
Slide 25 of 38
What is Happening?
March 2014:
Source:
http://www.reuters.com/article/slideshow/idUSBREA2P02H20140326#a=2
Slide 26 of 38
211 of 260
Financial Intermediation
+ Given this lets have a close look at the benefits and costs of bank
as financial intermediary.
Slide 27 of 38
Banks as Intermediaries
The structure of the bank loans does not mirror the banks
obligations in the form of deposits.
Slide 28 of 38
Banks as Intermediaries
212 of 260
Slide 29 of 38
Slide 30 of 38
The problem:
213 of 260
Slide 32 of 38
If they believe other investors are not withdrawing the best decision
Why run? they believe (and are correct) that the bank will fail.
Slide 33 of 38
Me - Others
Run
Dont Run
Run
1
2 Rs
0
Dont Run
Rs
Rl
Slide 34 of 38
Suspension of Convertibility
214 of 260
Slide 35 of 38
The FDIC
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation signed into law in the
Banking Act of 1933.
Slide 36 of 38
Me - Others
Run
Dont Run
Run
Rs
Rl
Dont Run
Rs
Rl
Q: In the model described, how much does the FDIC pay out?
Slide 37 of 38
215 of 260
Source: Kunt, Karacaovali, Laeven (2005).
Slide 38 of 38
Chapter 11
Money
216 of 260
Outline
1
Money
Money aggregates
Real and nominal interest rates
Monetary model
The consumers, firms and government using money
Money Demand, effects of money
Slide 3 of 47
Money
Slide 4 of 47
Money
Three questions:
1
What is money?
A medium of exchange
A store of value
A unit of account
217 of 260
Slide 5 of 47
2,754.2
1,196.9
3.3
1,079.3
474.6
M2
Savings deposits
Time deposits
Money market mutual funds
11,194.0
7,269.9
528.6
641.3
Source: http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/h6/Current/h6.pdf
Slide 6 of 47
Slide 7 of 47
218 of 260
Source: http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/categories/29
Slide 8 of 47
Slide 9 of 47
A nominal Bond is an asset that sells for one unit of dollars today
and returns 1 + R dollars tomorrow.
1+R
1+i
1
P
1+R
P0
1+r =
1+R
P0
1
P
1+R
P0
P
1+R
1+i
219 of 260
Slide 11 of 47
Slide 12 of 47
220 of 260
11.1
Monetary model
221 of 260
A Monetary Model
1+0
1
=
1+i
1+i
Slide 14 of 47
Models of Money
Money search
(people need money to ease transactions)
Slide 15 of 47
Household:
needs cash to buy goods
uses bonds to save
222 of 260
Slide 16 of 47
The Government
In the model Government is in charge of the Federal Reserve.
Changes the money supply:
M = M 0 M
0
M
M}
| {z
Question:
Is there a problem if the government controls
both B and M ?
Slide 17 of 47
Slide 18 of 47
= P G P T + (1 + R)B B 0
Changes in T : rebates
Changes in B 0 : open market operations
(exchange of cash for debt)
223 of 260
Slide 20 of 47
Slide 21 of 47
224 of 260
Slide 22 of 47
Slide 23 of 47
225 of 260
11.2
226 of 260
Board of Governors:
Slide 24 of 47
http://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/fomccalendars.htm
Slide 25 of 47
Definition:
Reserves = Required Reserves + Excess Reserves
227 of 260
Slide 26 of 47
The Fed:
Balance sheet of the FED
Assets
Liabilities
US securities
Currency in Circulation
Discount loans to banks
Reserves
Definition:
Monetary Base = Currency in Circulation + Reserves
Slide 27 of 47
228 of 260
Slide 29 of 47
Discount Loans
For example: the Fed loans 1$ to banking system:
http://tiny.cc/8RDgD
Slide 31 of 47
Goods Market: Y = C + I + G
Labor Market: Ns = Nd
Credit Market: B = S
Money Demand
Slide 32 of 47
Ms
|{z}
Money Supply
229 of 260
Slide 33 of 47
230 of 260
Slide 35 of 47
Targeting Rules
Slide 36 of 47
Targeting rules
Central Banks use one of the following rules for monetary policy:
1
Inflation Targeting:
Set i = i
Where R = r + i
231 of 260
Slide 37 of 47
Slide 38 of 47
Recall M d = P L(Y, r)
Function L is increasing in Y
Function L is decreasing in r
232 of 260
Slide 40 of 47
Slide 41 of 47
Slide 42 of 47
233 of 260
Slide 43 of 47
Slide 44 of 47
output decreases
Slide 45 of 47
Expected Inflation
Suppose workers get paid today and can use wages only for next
period consumption.
P w
w
=
0
P
i1
Intuition:
Higher wages
higher incentive to work
Higher inflation lower purchasing power next period =
234 of 260
Unexpected Inflation
What if inflation is unexpected? Friedman-Lucas model
Suppose wage is payed next period, so that nominal wage is P 0 w.
Suppse also that P 0 w (nominal wages) increases.
Summary:
1
235 of 260
11.3
What Economists Do
236 of 260
What Economists Do
Robert E. Lucas, Jr.
December 9, 1988
Economists have an image of practicality and worldliness not shared by physicists
and poets. Some economists have earned this image. Othersmyself and many Of my
colleagues here at Chicagohave not. Im not sure whether you will take this as a confession or a boast, but we are basically story-tellers, creators of make-believe economic
systems. Rather than try to explain what this story-telling activity is about and why I
think it is a usefuleven an essentialactivity, I thought I would just tell you a story and
let you make of it what you like.
My story has a point: I want to understand the connection between changes in the
money supply and economic depressions. One way to demonstrate that I understand
this connectionI think the only really convincing waywould be for me to engineer a
depression in the United States by manipulating the U.S. money supply. I think I know
how to do this, though Im not absolutely sure, but a real virtue of the democratic system
is that we do not look kindly on people who want to use our lives as a laboratory. So I
will try to make my depression somewhere else.
The location I have in mind is an old-fashioned amusement parkroller coasters, fun
house, hot dogs, the works. I am thinking of Kennywood Park in Pittsburgh, where I
lived when my children were at the optimal age as amusement park companions - a
beautiful, turn-of-the-century place on a bluff overlooking the Monongahela River. If
you have not seen this particular park, substitute one with which you are familiar, as I
want you to try to visualize how the experiment I am going to describe would actually
work in practice.
Kennywood Park is a useful location for my purposes because it is an entirely independent monetary system. One cannot spend U.S. dollars inside the park. At the
gate, visitors use U.S. dollars to purchase tickets and than enter the park and spend the
tickets. Rides inside are priced at so many tickets per ride. Ride operators collect these
tickets, and at the end of each day they are cashed in for dollars, like chips in a casino.
237 of 260
For obvious reasons, business in park fluctuates: Sundays are big days, July 4 is
even bigger. On most concessionsI imagine each ride in the park to be independently
operatedthere is soma flexibility: an extra person can be called in to help take tickets
or to speed people getting on and off the ride, on short-notice if the day is unexpectedly
big or with advanced notice if it is predictable. If business is disappointingly slow, an
operator will let some of his help leave early. So GNP in the park (total tickets spent)
and employment (the number of man hours worked) will fluctuate from one day to the
next due to fluctuations in demand. Do we want to call a slow daya Monday or a
Tuesday, saya depression? Surely not. By an economic depression we mean something
that ought not to happen, something pathological, not normal seasonal or daily ups and
downs.
This, I imagine, is how the park works. (I say imagine because I as just making
most of this up as I go along.) Technically, Kennywood Park is a fixed exchange rate
system, since its central bankthe cashiers office at the gatestands ready to exchange
local currencyticketsfor foreign currencyUS dollarsat a fixed rate.
In this economy, there is an obvious sense in which the number of tickets in circulation is economically irrelevant. No-onecustomer or concessioner really cares about
the number of tickets per ride except insofar as these prices reflect U.S. dollars per ride.
If the number of tickets per U.S. dollar were doubled from 10 to 20, and if the prices
of all rides were doubled in terms of tickets6 tickets per roller coaster ride instead of
3and if everyone understood that these changes had occurred, it just would not make
any important difference. Such a doubling of the money supply and of prices would
amount to a 100 percent inflation in terms of local currency, but so what?
Yet I want to show you that changes in the quantity of moneyin the number of
tickets in circulationhave the capacity to induce depressions or booms in this economy
(just as I think they do in reality). To do so, I want to imagine subjecting Kennywood
Park to an entirely operational experiment. Think of renting the park from its owners
for one Sunday, for suitable compensation, and taking over the functions of the cashiers
office. Neither the operators of concessions nor the customers are to be informed of this.
Then, with no advance warning to anyone inside the park, and no communication to
them as to what is going on, the cashiers are instructed for this one day to give 8 tickets
per dollar instead of 10. What will happen?
We can imagine a variety of reactions. Some customers, discouraged or angry, will
turn around and go home. Others, coming to the park with a dollar budget fixed by
Mom, will just buy 80 percent of the tickets they would have bought otherwise. Still
others will shell out 20 percent more dollars and behave as they would have in the
238 of 260
absence of this change in exchange rates. I would have to know much more than I
do about Kennywood Park patrons to judge how many would fall into each of these
categories, but it is pretty clear that no-one will be induced to take more tickets than if
the experiment had not taken place, many will buy fewer, and thus that the total number
of tickets in circulationthe money supply of this amusement park economywill take
a drop below what it otherwise would have been on this Sunday.
Now hear does all of this look from the point of view of the operator of a ride
or the guy selling hot dogs? Again, there will be a variety of reactions. In general,
most operators will notice that the park seems kind of empty, for a Sunday, and that
customers dont seam to be spending like they usually do. More time is being spent
on freebies, the river view or a walk through the gardens. Many operators take this
personally. Those who were worried that their ride was becoming passe get additional
confirmation. Those who thought they were just starting to become popular, and had
had thoughts of adding some capacity, begin to wonder if they had perhaps become overoptimistic. On many concessions, the extra employees hired to deal with the expected
Sunday crowd are sent home early. A gloomy, depressed mood settles in.
What I have done, in short, is to engineer a depression in the park. The reduction
in the quantity of money has led to a reduction in real output and employment. And
this depression is indeed a kind of pathology. Customers are arriving at the park, eager
to spend and enjoy themselves, Concessioners are ready and waiting to serve them. By
introducing a glitch into the parks monetary system, we have prevented (not physically,
but just as effectively) buyers and sellers from getting together to consummate mutually
advantageous trades.
That is the end of my story. Rather than offer you some of my opinions about the
nature and causes of depressions in the United States, I simply made a depression and
let you watch it unfold. I hope you found it convincing on its own termsthat what I said
would happen in the park as the result of my manipulations would in fact happen. If so,
then you will agree that by increasing the number of tickets per dollar we could as easily
have engineered a boom in the park. But we could not, clearly, engineer a boom Sunday
after Sunday by this method. Our experiment worked only because our manipulations
caught everyone by surprise. We could have avoided the depression by leaving things
alone, but we could not use monetary manipulation to engineer a permanently higher
level of prosperity in the park. The clarity with which these affects can be seen is the
key advantage of operating in simplified, fictional worlds.
The disadvantage, it must be conceded, is that we are not really interested in understanding and preventing depressions in hypothetical amusement parks. We are in239 of 260
terested in our own, vastly more complicated society. To apply the knowledge we have
gained about depressions in Kennywood Park, we must be willing to argue by analogy
from what we know about one situation to what we would like to know about another,
quite different situation. And, as we all know, the analogy that one person finds persuasive, his neighbor may well, find ridiculous.
Well, that is why honest people can disagree. I dont know what one can do about
it, except keep trying to tell better and better stories, to provide the raw material for
better and more instructive analogies. How else can we free ourselves from the limits
of historical experience so as to discover ways in which our society can operate better
than it has in the past? In any case, that is what economists do. We are storytellers,
operating much of the time in worlds of make believe. We do not find that the realm
of imagination and ideas is an alternative to, or a retreat from, practical reality. On the
contrary, it is the only way we have found to think seriously about reality.
In a way, there is nothing more to this method than maintaining the conviction (which
I know you have after four years at Chicago) that imagination and ideas matter. I hope
you can do this in the years that follow. It is fun and interesting and, really, there is no
practical alternative.
240 of 260
Chapter 12
The End: 7 lessons from this course
241 of 260
Empirics: You know where to look for any type of Macro data:
Proficient in using aggregate datasets
Graphical analysis and basic statistics
Filtering: linear and Hodrick-Prescott
7 Lessons to remember
Slide 6 of 8
7 Lessons to remember
242 of 260
Slide 7 of 8
7 Lessons to remember
Slide 8 of 8
243 of 260
Part III
Problem Sets
244 of 260
2014
15
9
$1.6
$2.2
1. Compute the Laspeyres and Paasche indices for each year taking as base year 2013.
2. Compute Nominal GDP and its growth rate.
3. Compute Real GDP using both the Laspeyres and Paasche indices. Compute growth
rates of real GDP using both indices.
4. Compute inflation in 2014 using both the Laspeyres and Paasche indices.
(1)
(1)
where Kt+1 is the capital stock in year t + 1, Kt in year t, It investment in year t. Set the
depreciation rate d = 0.05. Use data from table 1.1.6 of the NIPA accounts. For GDP (line
1) and Investment (line 7). Use annual data from 1960 to 2013.
1. Calculate the level of capital in 1960 assuming that the capital output ratio for that
year is equal to 2: K1960 /Y1960 = 2.
2. Using equation (1) and the value of K1960 , calculate Kt+1 for all years 1961 to 2013.
3. Plot the capital output ratio between 1960 to 2013.
Rules:
1. This homework is optional.
2. The grade of this homework will be averaged with your previous 5 problem sets if it
will increase the average score. This way there is no risk in submitting the homework.
3. You may work in groups. Each group member must submit an answer independently.
Question 1
On Friday May 2nd at 8:30AM (EST) the Bureau of Labor Statistics will release the Employment Situation for April 2014. In this homework you are asked to forecast some of the
key metrics in this release. In particular answer the following:
1. Forecast 1: By what amount will Total Nonfarm Payroll Employment grow by.
2. Forecast 2: The Unemployment Rate.
Here are important guidelines and tips for the homework:
1. The numerical values of the forecast must be submitted here: http://tinyurl.com/73240hw6 by Thursday May1st at 11:59PM Pittsburgh time.
2. To homework will be graded not by the precision of the forecast but by the methodology
used. A detailed description of the methodology used must be submitted in class on
Friday May 2nd .
3. Any official data including ADP data might be used to generate the forecast.
4. Any of the procedures studied in Lecture 3 or Lecture 856 will be acceptable (more
advanced procedures are also welcomed).
5. A sample of the same release for March 2014 can be found here:
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm
Index
ADP, 160, 257
Aggregation, 62
Asymmetric Information, 203, 255
Failures of GDP, 25
FDIC, 203
Feasibility, 93
Fed balance sheet, 226
Federal Reserve System, 226
Filtering, 245
Financial Panics, 203
Firm investment, 180
First Welfare Theorem, 104
Fiscal stimulus, 185
Fiscal Stimulus: static, 93
Fisher Equation, 216
Flow of funds, 160
FOMC, 226
Forecasting, 245
Forecasting: definition, 39
Friedman on Methodology, 14
Friedman-Lucas Model, 231
Full Redistribution, 108
GDP deflator, 56
Government Budget Constraint, 88
260 of 260