Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
VOLUME X X I I
THE
OCTOBER, ]939
RIBOFLAVIN
CONTENT
DAVID B. H A N D
NUMBER 10
OF COW'S
MILK
T h e r i b o f l a v i n c o n t e n t of a b o u t 400 s a m p l e s of m i l k p r o d u c e d i n N e w
Y o r k S t a t e h a s been d e t e r m i n e d . T h e p r e s e n c e of r i b o f l a v i n in c o w ' s m i l k
is of c o n s i d e r a b l e biological significance. R i b o f l a v i n is l i n k e d w i t h biological o x i d a t i o n s ( a n d p o s s i b l y w i t h t h e o x i d a t i o n s o c c u r r i n g in m i l k ) in
t h r e e w a y s : as t h e active g r o u p of a n e n z y m e (12, 9), as a h y d r o g e n a c c e p t e r
(11), a n d as a p h o t o s e n s i t i z e r f o r t h e o x i d a t i o n of v i t a m i n C (7, 4, 2 ) .
T h e a v e r a g e r i b o f l a v i n c o n t e n t of m i l k v a r i e s w i t h the d i f f e r e n t breeds,
t h e J e r s e y b e i n g highest, the G u e r n s e y i n t e r m e d i a t e a n d t h e H o l s t e i n lowest.
On t h e a v e r a g e , H o l s t e i n m i l k c o n t a i n s 33 p e r c e n t less r i b o f l a v i n t h a n J e r s e y
milk. See T a b l e 1. I t is i n t e r e s t i n g t h a t t h e o r d e r of b r e e d is s l i g h t l y difTABLE 1
t~iboflavin content of milk
Barn fed
Milk sample
]No.
analyses
Jersey ..................... [
Guernsey ............... I
Brown Swiss ...... I
Ayrshire ............... ]
Holstein ............... L
Cornell Herd ... I
Composite commercial ........
Pasture fed
~TO.
analyses
Average
1.69
1.42
1.80
24
14
5
10
23
76
1.90-3.40
1.41-2.52
2.00-2.62
1.57-2.38
1.19-2.44
1.19-3.40
2.37
2.04
2.37
1.97
1.64
2.04
1.64
50
1.60-2.27
1.97
Range
Average
25
14
4
9
22
74
1.55-3.42
1.64-2.72
1.80-2.08
1.26-2.08
0.60-2.31
0.60-3.42
2.18
1.91
53
1.34-2.17
1.87
(Analyses on the Cornell herd were made on April 7 and June 8, 1937, and those on
the composite commercial samples on April 4 and June 28, 1938.)
f e r e n t w i t h r e s p e c t to the c a r o t e n e c o n t e n t of m i l k f a t , in w h i c h case the
G u e r n s e y is h i g h e r t h a n t h e J e r s e y .
C o m m e r c i a l m i l k in s u m m e r was f o u n d to c o n t a i n a b o u t 20 p e r c e n t m o r e
r i b o f l a v i n t h a n w i n t e r milk. T h i s i n c r e a s e is a p p a r e n t l y a n effect of t h e d i e t
a n d is t r u e i n g e n e r a l w h e r e the c h a n g e in f e e d is f r o m corn silage to p a s t u r e .
Received for publication March 3, 19~9.
779
780
The average increase in the riboflavin content of the milk of the Cornell herd
in summer was 13 p e r cent. H o w e v e r the milk of cows receiving molassesgrass silage and phosphoric acid-grass silage was relatively high in winter
and did not increase in riboflavin content when the cows were placed on grass
pasture. Our observations confirm the work of V i r t a n e n and Holmberg
(10) who reported that with phosphoric acid silage the riboflavin content of
the milk remained constant t h r o u g h o u t the year.
A f u r t h e r study of seasonal and individual variation was made on 9 cows
beginning April 13 and extending to J u n e 29, 1938. A total of 164 analyses
were made. Some of the cows were stall fed on molasses-grass silage and
the rest were fed on phosphoric acid-grass silage and numerous samples were
taken during the two weeks period preceding t u r n i n g the cows out to grass
pasture. There was no evidence of a change in riboflavin content when the
cows were p u t out to graze. There was, however, considerable fluctuation
with all the cows throughout the 10 weeks period. The m a x i m u m deviations
of the 9 cows f r o m their individual means were between ~ 15 per cent and
27 per cent. The average value of riboflavin for all analyses for the 2
weeks before going on grass pasture feed was 2.28 and for the 2 weeks after
going on grass pasture was 2.12, indicating no increase. Since the average
deviation in all duplicate analyses was 3.99 per cent, a n y fluctuation less
t h a n this would be questionable with our method. D u r i n g this period of 10
weeks the m a x i m u m deviation of the control solution of riboflavin f r o m its
mean value was 6.0 per cent. The change in feed produced practically
no change in milk production which averaged 33.3 pounds per d a y before
and 32.5 a f t e r the cows were p u t out on pasture.
The riboflavin content of milk varies with the individual cow, as well as
with feed, breed and milk production. Variation among individual cows in
a given season can be more t h a n 500 per cent. The highest single milk
sample observed on grass pasture contained 3.42 mg. per liter and the lowest
contained 0.60 mg. per liter. Variations in individual, commercial, market
milk samples were much smaller and the range was narrower, being from
1.60 to 2.27 mg. per liter. This was to be expected because the commercial
samples were f r o m mixed milk coming from various dairies throughout the
state of New York. The samples were collected f r o m delivery wagons.
Because of the variations due to breed, feed and individual cows, it is
difficult to assign a single value as being the normal riboflavin content of
milk. I n place of a value, Table 1 showing group averages and Figure 1
showing distribution curves for milk samples with respect to riboflavin content are given. Individual variations in samples which are encountered in
most biological work produce a need for a special type of analytical procedure. The methods used m u s t be rapid and simple but need not be extremely accurate. I t is much more significant to have a large n u m b e r of
analyses with an accuracy of 5 per cent t h a n to have a few extremely
accurate results.
781
u~
90-80--
Commercial
samples
70--
E
c
0
60-5
--
"3
Individual
Cornell
40-u)
cows in
herd
50-C
20--
0,..
I0--
I
I
R,b0flavln
Fro. 1.
in mcj
per
liter
D i s t r i b u t i o n of riboflavin in milk.
milk is reported to be 90 per cent free of combination with protein (5) and
unesterified (6).
The determinations of riboflavin reported here were made by measuring
the intensity of fluorescence of an acetone milk filtrate with a photoelectric
cell and comparing this reading with the fluorescence of uranium glass as a
standard (3). In order to make sure that variations were not due to fluctuations in the instrument, comparative readings were frequently made using
a standard riboflavin solution which remained unchanged during the year.
No relation between riboflavin content of the milk and the development
of oxidized flavor in the dark was observed with the samples studied. A
definite inverse relation was found between riboflavin content and milk pro-
782
783