Scribd Logo
Încărcați

Bine ați venit la Scribd!

  • 10th GR Bottled Vs Tap Water Project

    Încărcat de

    Chip Chase
    120 vizualizări31 pagini
    10th Grade Bottled vs. Tap Water Project

    Titlu original

    10th GR Bottled vs Tap Water Project

    Drepturi de autor

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Formate disponibile

    PDF sau citiți online pe Scribd

    Vi se pare util acest document?

    Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

    Raportați acest document
    10th Grade Bottled vs. Tap Water Project

    Drepturi de autor:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Descărcați ca PDF sau citiți online pe Scribd
    Indicator pentru conținut neadecvat
    120 vizualizări31 pagini

    10th GR Bottled Vs Tap Water Project

    Încărcat de

    Chip Chase
    10th Grade Bottled vs. Tap Water Project

    Drepturi de autor:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Descărcați ca PDF sau citiți online pe Scribd
    Indicator pentru conținut neadecvat
    din 31
    EXAMPLE BACKGROUND 1. Background on Types of Water a._What type of bottled water are you testing? Deer park is the water that we are going to be testing b. Whatis the difference between bottled and tap water? (Use the articles we reviewed in class) ‘The difference between tap and bottle water is that tap water contains chlorine while bottle water does not. Bottle and tap water have different ways of getting treated. Sources: http:/Avww.diffen.com/difference/Bottied_Water_vs_Tap_Water c. How and where is the water produced? What water treatment process does the water go through (give a step-by-step description)? The water that is used in this water is all natural water. A spring could be an example of a natural resource they use. The company collect the water and is taken to the factory then put in storage. Then it goes through a mirco-filtertation After this it is bought to get disinfected. There are two ways to disinfect the water and those steps are called ultraviolation light disinfection and ozone disinfection but the ozone disinfection is, optional. When these steps are done it goes to get packaged and ship. Sources: http://www. nestle- watersna.com/content/documents/pdfs/nwna_10_step_spring_water_process.pdf d, How are the bottles made? What types of materials go into the production of the bottles? Are they recyclable? Plastic water bottles are made out of PET. PET is a type of plastic that is both strong and light weighted. PET is heated and poured into this mold, which makes it the shape of a tube, After this step is done it is transferred into another mold. In this mold the bottom of the water bottle is made and it is finishing to cool down so that water can be placed inside of it. Yes, plastic water bottles are recyclable. They can be reused and recycled to make a new one. Sources: http://www.thomasnet.com/articles/materials-handling/plastic-bottle- manufacturing d, How is DC tap water treated? DC tap water is treated in the Washington Aqueduct center, but they don't just provide DC water they also provide for many counties in Virginia. For example Arlington, Falls church. ‘Sources: https:/Avww.dewater.com/drinking_water/ HYPOTHESIS/PROCEDURES 4- 3~Meets the standard 2 1-Notyet Exceeds Approaching | approaching the thestandard | the standard standard Ican create a Hypothesis follows the If,..Then, hypothesis -»Because...format. using Hypothesis correctly includes the supporting independent and dependent variables. evidence Hypothesis is testable and gives some evidence for the reasoning. Ican design Procedure is detailed and explains the replicable EXACT steps the student research followed. Someone else could easily procedures follow the procedures but may have a that control for few questions. cofounding ‘Any changes that were made during variables. the lab were noted. BACKGROUND 4- ‘3-Meets the standard 2 1-Notyet Exceeds Approaching approaching the the standard | | :-the standard standard I can explain the water treatment + Background knowledge about DC's water treatment process is detailed process and the and thorough and included in the importance of final lab report. each step. I can explain + Background knowledge about methods of water treatment used locally and globally. bottled water treatment methods is accurate and thorough. All information is synthesized into student's OWN words. CONCLUSIONS 4. Exceeds the standard 3 ~Meets the standard 2 Approaching the standard. | Ican create Graph has a title, axis labels and graphs that appropriate increments. accurately Graph includes a caption that display data, somewhat explains the purpose of the graph. Ican use Hypothesis is supported or refuted. evidence to Evidence-based reasoning and evaluate explanation of the data collected whether the from the lab is stated in detail. hypothesis was supported or contradicted. Ican provide a detailed written description of collected data. Written description of results include only observations and no inferences in some detail. 4 Exceeds the standard 3--Meets the standard 2- Approaching the standard 41-Not yet approaching the standard lean erealza hypothes! using _supportin evidence Hypothesis follows the If..Then, -Because..form. Hypothesis correctly includes the independent and dependent variables Hypothesis is testable and gives aevidence based explanation for the reasoning. + Hypothesis follows the t..Then, nBlecause,.format. + Hypothesis correctly includes the independent and dependent variables. + Hypothesis is testable and gives ‘Some evidence forthe reasoning. + Hypothesis follows the I..Then, -Because..format. + Hypothesis correctly includes the independent and dependent variables. + Hypothesis is testable, but gives te evidence for the reasoning. + Hypothesis does not follow format. lean desi; replicable research; rocedures that contr for cofoundiris variables. Procedure is detailed and explains the EXACT steps the student followed. Someone else could easily follow the procedures without questions. ‘Any changes that were made uring the lab were noted, + Procedure is detailed and ‘explains the EXACT steps the student followed. Someone else ‘could easly follow the procedures but may havea few questions. + Any changes that were made during the ab were noted + Procedures not very detailed and someone else would have ifculy following the procedures. + Any changes that were made during the lab were not noted or were dificult to understand. + Procedure is missing or Incomprehensible. Sean ean | he water treatment tocess and theimport aco ofeach step. i {} Background knowledge about DC's water treatment process is detailed and thorough and Included inthe final lab report. Student provides detall Dbeyond what was discussed in class * Background knowledge about DC's ‘water treatment process (s detailed nd thorough and included in the final lab report. ‘Background knowledge about DC's water treatment process Is Presented but lacks detals or does not demonstrate a clear understanding ofthe water treatment process. + Background knowledge about DC's water treatment pracess Is not included or significantly lacking ‘can expla | methods of ‘Background knowledge about + Background knowledge about + Background knowledge about + Background knowledge Chat acen tly dlspay ta appropriate increments Graph includes a caption chat explains the purpose of the raph. appropriate increments. "Graph includes a caption that ‘somewhat explains the purpose of the graph, following: ite, axis labels and appropriate increments. Graph includes a caption that ‘explains the purpose of the graph. water reli hent used Dottied water treatment methods } bottled water treatment methods bottled water treatment methods about bottied water [cally and obally. ‘saccurate and thorough. All Isaccurate and thorough. All ‘is accurate but lacking in treatment methods is {formation i synthesized into information i synthesized into Information. Allinformation is significantly lacking or students OWN words, Student student's OWN words, synthesized Into students OWN missing. {goes above requirements to words. include detals about the water treatment methods. ean era bgraphs Graph hasattleaxislabelsand |» Graphhasatitle axislabelsand | - Graph is missing one ofthe + Graph isnot included or is Inaccurate, Ian use evidence to evaluate whether the hypothesis was supported or contradicted. Hypothesis s supported or refuted, Evidence-based reasoning and ‘explanation of the data collected from the lab i stated indetai, Background research is added tothe explanation, + Hypothesis is supported or refuted, Evidence-based reasoning and explanation ofthe data collected from the lab is stated in detail + Hypothesis is supported or refuted Evidence-based reasoning and explanation ofthe data collected from ‘the lab lacks detail and thoroughness, + Hypothesisis not support or refuted and evidence-based reasoning isnot provided. can provide a detailed written description of collected data, ‘Written description of results Include only observations and ‘no inferences in DETAIL. Written description of results include only observations and no inferences in some detail ‘Written description of results Include mostly observations and some inferences, + Written description of results are not complete, ‘can cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis ofa text, All research is properly cited ‘with tele and author. All research s from reliable sources and student uses more than @ sources. + Allresearch s propery cited With tle. Allresearch is from rellable sources and student uses between 5-8 sources, + Allresearch is propery cited with tele, All research is from reliable sources and student uses between 35 sources. + Research snot cited or is Incorrectly cited. ‘pagan use appropriate Spelling, grammar, mechanics and ‘conventions, No more than 1 spelling or ‘grammar mistakes. ALL mechanics and conventions are correct including punctuation and capitalization + No more than 3 spelling or ‘grammar mistakes. ‘+ AlL mechanics and conventions are correct including punctuation and capitalization. + Nomorethan 5 spelling or ‘grammar mistakes ‘+ MOST mechanies and conventions are correct ‘including punctuation and capitalization + More than 5 spelling or ‘grammar mistakes. + Several mechanics and conventions are incorrect. EXAMPLE HYPOTHESIS/PROCEDURES What is your independent variable (what you are changing)? The type of water What is your dependent variable (what you are measuring)? So people can tell the difference Record your prediction about what people will prefer bottled or DC tap water? If People drink deer park and tap water Then —_| they will be able to tell the difference Because | Deer Park Water is more tasteful then tap water because tap water has a different more dirty taste then bottled water. Il, Materials List all the materials you will need to conduct your biind taste test. 4 3 blind folds 6 glass cups tap water and bottled water( Deer Park) 1 ruler tape pen el@|~lo]aleleln IV. Procedures Record your procedures. Be sure to include AT LEAST 6 people and 3 trials for each person. 1. | Well, first of all i am going to pour deer park water on 3 glass cups 3 inches of water. 2 | Then i am going to pour tap water on 3 other glass cups i am going to pour 3 inches of water on each glass. 3 | Then am going to label each 3 glasses cups tap water and 3 other one’s bottled water. 4 | Then iam going to ask my three volunteers to sit down and am going to blind fold them so they won't see the water.( mom, brother, dad). 5 | Then i am going to serve them tap water first then they are going to drink it, 1am going to do 3 trials for tap water per person. 6 | Then i am going to serve them bottled water and i am going to give them 3 trials too per person 7 | Then i am going to ask them if they can tell me the difference witch one is tap and witch one is bottled. 8 | Finally i am going to record my data based on what my volunteers tell me. 10 "1 12 413 14 15 Chemistry 2014-2015 Unit 1: Scientific Design Name: Date: Period: Tap vs. Bottled Reading Graphie Organizer LT: I can analyze reliable informational text. Instructions: Read your table’s assigned article and fill out the graphic organizer below. After all groups have completed the reading and graphic organizer you will share out your findings and complete the graphic organizer on this worksheet. Name of article: 1, Record THREE main ideas from the article. 2. What is one interesting fact from your article? 3. What is one question you have after reading your article? Chemistry 2014-2015 Unit 1: Scientific Design Name:_____________—Date:_ Period: Tap vs. Bottled Water Reading Share-Out Instructions: As each group presents their findings fill in the graphic organizer below. Tdeas Table | Name of Mi # Article Bottled vs. Tap Water Lab Investigation Graphic Organizer Rubric Name: Period: Date: |. Background on Types of Water ‘a. What type of bottled water are you testing? b. How and where is the water produced? What water treatment process does the water go through (give a step-by-step description)? Sources: cc. Howare the bottles made? What types of materials go into the production of the bottles? Are they recyclable? ‘Sources: d. How is DC tap water treated? Sources: Il, Hypothesis What is your independent variable (what you are changing)? Ie \Wleker le Can Te What is your dependent variable (what you are measuring)? hgehe, con Taste The Record your prediction about what people will prefer bottled or DC tap water? ae They can “Te ine cli#ieence Hap water taste like metal and botried weer dees Not ll, Materials List all the materials you will need to conduct your blind taste test. BS dvbent pepe 1d dloss cus HVlanesprens A voter _asttled (Tap rocedures Record your procedures. Be sure to include AT LEAST 6 people and 3 trials for each person, Fill S vith Tap weer (5 4a! FN one Cup with bottlect rae lest Mu Sack 3 Times : Repro Seo! il Siep2 Test my mom BTimes A Repeos Hep ( \ Reprat skpo lest ny brother and Recaralyne Sate V. Data Table Include your data table below. An example is provided (feel free to change it). VI. Data Analysis Graph You will insert a graph displaying your data here. Written Description ‘What does your data show? (Don't draw any conclusions just discuss your data), sree Fewer Regulations fr Boted Wate Than Tap, GAO Says - NYTimes cam Tye New York Gimes Table ee AL July 9, 2009 Fewer Regulations for Bottled Water Than Tap, GAO Says By SARA GOODMAN of Greenwire Bottled water manufacturers are not required to disclose as much information as municipal water utilities because of gaps in federal oversight authority, according to reports released yesterday by government auditors. Bottom line: The Food and Drug Administration oversees bottled water, and U.S. EPA is in charge of tap water. FDA lacks the regulatory authority of EPA, John Stephenson of the Government Accountability Office told a House panel. ‘The Safe Drinking Water Act empowers EPA to require water testing by certified laboratories and that violations be reported within a specified time frame. Public water systems must also provide reports to customers about their water, noting its source, evidence of contaminants and compliance with regulations. ’y comparison, GAO said, FDA regulates bottled water as a food and cannot require certified lab testing or olation reporting. Furthermore, FDA does not require bottled water companies to disclose to consumers where the water came from, how it has been treated or what contaminants it contains. In a survey of 188 brands of bottled water released yesterday, the nonprofit Environmental Working Group found only two providing such information about its product to consumers. FDA should look for ways of providing consumers with this kind of information, Stephenson told the House tions Subcommittee. "Our work suggests that consumers may benefit from such Oversight and Inve additional information." Bottling companies could be required to provide a phone number on their labels so consumers can follow through if they want more information, said Joseph Doss, president and CEO of the International Bottled ‘Water Association. Doss emphasized, however, that bottled water is more strictly regulated than other food products to ensure safety across the board. House Energy and Commerce Chairman Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) and Investigations Subcommittee Chairman Bart Stupak (D-Mich.) yesterday sent letters to 13 botilers asking for information regarding testing, water sources and treatment processes. “N]either the public nor federal regulators know nearly enough about where bottled water comes and what EPA and FDA have similar standards of water quality regulations, said Joshua Sharfstein, principal deputy commissioner of food and drugs for FDA. The law governing FDA ~- the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Aot — renmiras that the agenev establish a aualitv standard once EPA has determined a safe level for snsmo14 Fewer Regulations for Botled Water Than Tep, GAO Says - NYTimes.com individual contaminants in drinking water. ‘That means FDA has generally adopted EPA's standards for contaminants in drinking water for its bottled water regulations. Some contaminants have resulted in different standards, however. For example, EPA requires public water systems to treat their water to reduce lead levels that exceed 15 parts per billion. Because bottled water does not have to deal with leaching from plumbing systems, however, FDA set its standard at 5 ppb, Sharfstein said. A notable exception has been regarding a type of a chemical used to soften plastic ~ DEHP, a member of the phthalate family -- Sharfstein acknowledged. More than a decade ago, EPA issued a standard for DEHP in public drinking water. FDA deferred proposing an allowable level for bottled water because the chemical is allowed in some food packaging. This raised the concern that legal uses could exceed the standard, Sharfstein said. But FDA has now determined that bottled water manufacturers do not use DEHP in their bottles, Sharfstein said, so the agency is moving forward with the decision to set a standard. Sharfstein declined to discuss a timeline, saying that it is now a matter of the time it takes to prepare a standard. Click here (pdf) to read Waxman and Stupak's letters. Copyright 2009 E&E Publishing. All Rights Reserved. For more news on energy and the environment, visit www.greenwire,com. ‘Sonata 2008 __PrivaouPoti | TermsctSenice | Search | Covectons | RSS|] Fusttock | Help| Contacts | Work orUs | Site Man sras014 Bottled Water: Better Than th Tap? S. Food and Drug Administration FDA Consumer magazine ~uly-August 2002 Tall e +e Ss Bottled Water: Better Than the Tap? By Anne Christiansen Bullers t's a rare day that Kelly Harrison, a mother of five from Tulsa, Okla., doesn't find herself chauffeuring kids to some kind of sports practice or school activity. As she checks to see that each child is seat-belted into the family's minivan, Harrison also makes sure they've got the essentials: the right sports equipment, the right clothes, and what she considers to be the right drink--bottled water. ‘When she was growing up, Harrison, 34, might have grabbed a soft drink or juice on her way out the door. But for her kids, Harrison insists on what she thinks is a healthier choice--water. She says her children's young bodies need water as they play in the Oklahoma sun. Bottled water also contains no caffeine, no calories and no sugar. Plus, bottled water comes in convenient bottles, easy to tote from home to wherever the busy family goes. [See what Ameri inking in 2002.} “L really think this is best for a lot of different reasons," says Harrison, who often tucks a bottle for herself -AY_pito the basket in her minivan that contains other on-the-go mom necessities, such asa paperback book

    S-ar putea să vă placă și