Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
paradox
In this paper, I tried to write about logical fallacies about their types
and how they differ from each other. This topic seems to me very
interesting and exciting. Pondering about logical errors is the best way
to examine our logical abilities and one of the most effective ways of
its training. Familiarity with paradoxes (and sophistry), penetration into
their essence, into its hidden issues is not a simple matter. It requires
maximum concentration and inventing a few simple, seemingly
statements.
As an illustration:
Numbers in
Another one
3 and 4 are two different numbers, 3 and 4 - 7 is thus 7 - two
different forms. This looks correct and convincing arguments confuse
or identified different, not identical things: a simple listing of numbers
(the first part of the argument), and the mathematical operation of
addition (second part of the argument); between first and second
cannot equate, violation of the law of identity.
Form ancient times sophists were ideologically opposed by famous
Greek philosopher Socrates, who claimed that there is an objective
truth, but not knowing how exactly it is: whereby meaning that
everybody has a duty to seek for the truth common to everyone.
The discussion between the sophists and Socrates of the existence
of objective truth started about in V century B.C. Since then this
argument is still debated. Among our contemporaries we can meet a
lot of people who claim that there is nothing objective in the public
Paradoxes
The paradox represents a situation without solution, a kind of
mental dead end, "a stumbling block" of the logic: throughout its
history many different ways to overcome and resolve paradoxes were
proposed, but none of them is not comprehensive, definitive and
universally recognized.
At first glance paradox seem very similar to the sophistry, as it
leads us to contradictory arguments. However, the main difference
between them is that sophism is a lie, looking like a truth, but the
paradox is the truth in the dress of the lies. This, of course, a figurative
comparison, but it is quite accurately captures the essence of the
problem. In fact, the connection of sophistry and paradoxes is more
subtle and complex. Paradox can be a conclusion of sophistry. The