0 evaluări0% au considerat acest document util (0 voturi)
18 vizualizări3 pagini
This document provides a description and vision for governance at the 2nd Experimental School of Athens in Greece. It summarizes that the school has undergone several policy changes that have affected its culture and curriculum. It aims to improve human communication, particularly regarding human rights and student safety/security. It proposes bringing back positive programs that were previously in place to promote inclusion, mediation, anti-racism training, and student/parent participation and feedback. The vision is to establish a more cooperative and collaborative approach among all school stakeholders.
This document provides a description and vision for governance at the 2nd Experimental School of Athens in Greece. It summarizes that the school has undergone several policy changes that have affected its culture and curriculum. It aims to improve human communication, particularly regarding human rights and student safety/security. It proposes bringing back positive programs that were previously in place to promote inclusion, mediation, anti-racism training, and student/parent participation and feedback. The vision is to establish a more cooperative and collaborative approach among all school stakeholders.
This document provides a description and vision for governance at the 2nd Experimental School of Athens in Greece. It summarizes that the school has undergone several policy changes that have affected its culture and curriculum. It aims to improve human communication, particularly regarding human rights and student safety/security. It proposes bringing back positive programs that were previously in place to promote inclusion, mediation, anti-racism training, and student/parent participation and feedback. The vision is to establish a more cooperative and collaborative approach among all school stakeholders.
From the Greek group, 2nd experimental school of Athens
In terms of governance, Greek schools have been caught in a series of policy changes which have a direct effect on attitudes and on the hidden curriculum. The opportunity for consultation with parents and students which had achieved a high standard, also in collaboration with the Ombudsmans office and NGOs, has lately been directed only to learning issues, limiting social issues to a minimum. The Experimental schools (linked traditionally to research and to University students on the job training) in particular, which were for a period of the last two years termed Model schools had to change the way they received new students and to recruit students after entrance exams in math, language and physics, at the age of 12, which limited other skills and competences. At the same time there was no pressure for intercultural learning efforts because very few children on migrant background could meet the Greek mother tongue highly competitive standards (only one child out of 7 was accepted). Also, teachers were evaluated for academic and performance competence and those found as not fulfilling the criteria to stay in the model schools were forced to leave. This caused on one hand a renewal of the staff, since the positions were covered by teachers with higher qualifications, but, on the other hand, produced a dramatic change in the feeling of security for teachers in experimental schools and affected the relations between them. The change in curricula, also brought changes to several positive points that were previously in the school program. One of the changes due to the changing policies was related to choices regarding the formal Curriculum: there used to be an one hour course School Social Life, on human rights, inclusion and social skills introducing students of the first year in gymnasium. This was replaced by one hour of physics. Other minor changes were made as a result of more authoritarian and less cooperative attitudes getting established. Students were encouraged to learn from the books rather than from sharing social issues. The school has had a good tradition of many extra curricula activities, including sports, arts, conflict management and parents participation both through a Parents Association and with weekly meeting opportunities with the teachers- Thursday was meeting the parents day. As in all schools there are yearly elections of students representatives in every class and a group of 15 students representing the student body for the whole
school. Teachers supervised the presentations of candidates and
recently election were conducted with electronic ballot. On this good tradition the student participation was enhanced since 2011 with the Dialogues of Friendship social group which mediated in conflict, supported the victims of bullying but also mediated to students with a persistently aggressive behaviour or with feelings of self destruction. The group also created discreet support for poverty stricken families, with food purchase and support for participation in school trips for students who could not afford the fee. Anti racist training and human rights training had become a priority for about one third of the staff and was well received by the majority and the school principal. In 2014 the box of complaints and proposals which assured evaluation by the learners and the conflict resolution handled at peer level was withdrawn, a lot of the communication was through e-mail, the increased volume of which made the human relations a process of response to duties rather than an inspirational communication. The school maintained a good level of social activities but planning and communicating was an individual teachers task rather than a shared opportunity to learn. At the same time the school managed to maintain a good level of parent- teacher communication and good standards of discussion at teachers level. Also cooperation on inter thematic activities raised individual teaching achievement. The Vision for the future aims at an improvement of human communication regarding especially the human rights and the safety and security of students. Also to more training available for all stakeholders (students, teachers, parents). A major change is the return to the old system of inviting new students for A class, not through exams in three subjects but through a lottery-draw system, of equal numbers of boys and girls, regardless of their difference in the point of departure, just children who have completed the primary school level. We will also have a different principle elected partly by the teachers Assembly. Some of the practical ways we may use are the following: Interdisciplinary cooperation in or extra curriculum, seems to be an important factor in setting improved teaching goals and in a positive working conditions. This also helps understanding of issues in our Academic meetings. So this should be encouraged and supported.
Learners assessment of the school can be important both in
setting improvement goals as well as teaching responsible participation to students. So, we envision a large wall printed copy of our school newspaper, inviting articles as well as cartoons from the students- now it only has an electronic form and is not widely read. This can increase participation and sharing of ideas and feelings and invite students and teachers solidarity.. We are hoping to bring back the Box of Complaints and Proposals which used to fetch contributions by a large number of students who are too shy or scared to express themselves otherwise. We want to bring back the Peer mediation team of students with the training and the support by the NGOs as it used to be. We need to re-establish the Parents support group with the psychologists. We want to create a new training opportunity for mainstreaming of equality and antiracism education with collaboration of different teachers. We could also create a focus team to gather educational material on Human Rights education to be available for teachers and for University students who come for their on the job training to our school.
Classroom-Ready Resources for Student-Centered Learning: Basic Teaching Strategies for Fostering Student Ownership, Agency, and Engagement in K–6 Classrooms