Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
(1789)–Present
This literature review focuses on modern British and American writing about natural
history, or nature writing. Nature writing is the term used commonly in the secondary literature
—criticism, anthologies, and genre studies—and is more or less equivalent to the term natural
history writing; both terms convey a sense of the traditional role of the naturalist in documenting
their surroundings in a scientific, but literary fashion. Some writers distinguish between science
writing, nature writing, and science and nature writing (Johnson-Sheehan, Bogard 365). This
review considers a fairly expanded definition of nature writing, to include, generally, writing that
is non-fiction, takes as its subject the non-human world, excluding technology, and tends to
make an effort to be impersonal and objective, or at least to appear so. But this review also
considers nature writing’s many forms, including the philosophical essays of Thoreau;
agricultural writing, an important sub-genre of nature writing, which concerns the technologies
that humans use to draw sustenance from the land; and the subjectivity that characterizes many
important nature writers, like Mark and Delia Owens, who lived in and wrote about Africa’s
Kalahari desert wilderness for years, interweaving the animals’ survival struggles with their own.
They write of one among many close calls “We could not backtrack with any certainty. We were
lost. With less than a quart of water on board the Land Rover, we could not risk driving farther
from camp [. . .] This was just the type of situation we should have avoided” (Owens 30). This
type of subjective involvement in the environment being studied, and the writing about it,
characterizes much of what is considered modern nature writing, and is part of the appeal to the
readers—placing the readers in the context of an environment that may be remote in space and
Survey of Literature Modern British and American Nature Writing 2
time. Viewed in an historic context, even the earliest commonly acknowledged nature writers
exhibited in their writings a personal involvement with their subject, their locale, and so this
common theme of writing as inextricably linked to a place has run through nature writing in the
Much of this writing is concerned with a few essential questions: What is nature’s
character if not disturbed by humans; what does it mean for nature to be in a state of harmony,
and how are human themes related to any harmony of nature; if humans are a part of nature,
This review will establish some idea of the total scope of nature writing, its historic
beginnings, important authors and works, and general characteristics in terms of rhetoric and
style. Modern British and American writing will be examined in more detail, not least because
the Anglo-American tradition of nature writing, rich in variety, has a high degree of continuity
over the past two centuries. Several genres and aspects of nature writing will be mentioned only
Much of this review takes on the tone of an extended definition, because of the
complexities in defining nature writing. What constitutes nature, and what it means to write
about it, becomes very complicated. The idea of nature writing suggests something other than
scientific objectivity, a more subjective type of writing, that includes elements of the naturalists
reacting to their environment, rather than attempting to study it objectively. The range and
volume of nature writing, as it is defined by current literary scholars, suggests that while nature
writing does have some commonly-agreed-upon characteristics, it also covers a vast range of
material, of various types and forms, much like its subject. Perhaps the many forms that the
genre has taken can be attributed to the many forms that its subject—nature—takes.
Survey of Literature Modern British and American Nature Writing 3
The starting points for this review are several genre studies and anthologies. These broad
overviews of the field provide some perspective on the range of types of writing, and also help to
place the texts into perspective—rhetorically, historically, in terms of genres and sub-genres, and
in relationship to culture and society. The authors of the primary texts were often important
historical figures, sometimes helping shape public opinion and policy. The genre studies serve as
secondary sources, providing some insights into specific authors and works.
The anthologies serve as both primary and secondary sources, providing excerpts from a
range of longer works as well as historic overviews of the material and other commentary that
helps put the huge volume of available material in perspective. One anthologist commented:
“The field is [. . .] vast—there exists, for example, a bibliography on just one mountain range,
the Adirondacks, which comes to 354 pages, and covers only material published through 1955!
(It takes a 198-page supplement to continue the Adirondack coverage just ten years further, to
1965.)” (Lyon 399). The Norton Book of Nature Writing, an anthology of modern American and
British nature writing, states: “Even within the bounds of language and form which we set for
this collection, the terrain of nature writing is a vast and only partially mapped one” (Finch,
Elder 17).
This review focuses primarily on modern English-language works, but to place nature
writing in a global context, it seems necessary to consider the literatures that cultures other than
British and American have produced in response to their experience of their own local natural
history. Most languages and cultures—even the most primitive—likely have some tradition of a
form of nature writing. A review of the Association for the Study of Literature and the
Survey of Literature Modern British and American Nature Writing 4
Environment’s online bibliography of recommended reading shows authors and works from
every continent, with many non-Anglophone countries represented. Finch and Elder point out
that “[. . .] the recognition of valid alternative conceptions of nature in other cultures has led to a
series of provocative inquiries: How does the human mind make sense of nature? How does
human meaning in general derive from natural phenomena? And what, ultimately, constitutes the
perennial attraction of and need for things natural in our lives?” (28).
There is a rich and growing tradition of popular fiction writing that takes nature as a
prominent theme, however this review will concern itself only with non-fiction in its many
forms. Again, to help place the non-fiction writing in context, it is noteworthy that these popular
fiction works are bringing the same natural history- and environment-oriented themes treated in
non-fiction writing to the attention of a wide popular audience, including many who might not
have an interest in non-fiction prose. This trend seems likely destined to, in turn, affect the non-
Natural history writers and their works have exerted major influences on the ways that
cultures view and relate to nature; on public policy, from the establishment of huge tracts of
protected wilderness lands, to the banning of DDT, to the acceptance of some technologies
(Stewart 73–74, 127, 162–163). The method of communicating information about nature can
have important effects on the management of natural resources, for example communicating
forest management practices to the owners of the forests (Paretti 439). In an expanded sense, the
body of nature writing informs human conceptions of how to best manage nature globally, as in
modern scientific ecology. In his work on modern ecological thought, Botkin describes how two
Survey of Literature Modern British and American Nature Writing 5
groups who shared the same goals for Tsavo National Park in Kenya—to preserve the wildlife
and environment—had the opposite effect, with the best of intentions. He explains this failure in
part because of what he calls a “[. . .] breakdown in myths, beliefs, and fundamental paradigms
that modern technological civilization held about nature” (24). The paradigms to which Botkin
refers are, in large part, based in the rhetorical, historical, and literary traditions and qualities of
writing about nature. Part of Botkin’s message is that humans can no longer simply leave nature
alone, and that it will somehow reach an optimal state; at this point in history, humans must
intervene, and must therefore develop an understanding of what to do, not based on myths but on
the way that nature actually operates. This will require, in part, a revolution in the way that
nature writing represents nature, and this revolution seems to have already started, in the fields of
ecocriticism and ecopoetics (Killingsworth 367). Nature writing is entering a new era of
In their anthology, Finch and Elder surmise that “Today, nature writing in America
flourishes as never before. Nonfiction may well be the most vital form of current American
literature, and a notable proportion of the best writers of nonfiction practice nature writing” (24).
The vitality of the primary writings provides a wealth of opportunities for secondary studies and
scholarship, to help interpret and document the genre. Nature writing is also relevant to the
growth of vocational opportunities for writers, as Waddell points out that “[. . .] environmental
communication has become one of the fastest-growing [professional] areas within scientific and
The important authors and their works, to a large extent, define the genre of nature
Survey of Literature Modern British and American Nature Writing 6
writing. Throughout the history of this genre, milestone works and their authors have reinvented
what it means to write about nature and humans’ relationship with it. These authors and their
works can be analyzed, grouped, and compared in terms of taxonomy—what types of works
authors typically produced—and in terms of history—when these authors were writing and how
their works fit into the larger history of nature writing. Each type, or sub-genre, of nature writing
A taxonomy of works helps to make sense of the larger genre of nature writing in
somewhat the same way that Linnaeus’s system of taxonomy helped scientists and laymen alike
make sense of the natural world. It provides general categories for grouping works and authors,
shows how they are related in terms of form and other characteristics, and provides a basis for
comparison.
Examining the history of the major works helps put the evolution of the genre into
perspective. Considering the historical aspects of the early and influential works helps make
sense of who the important innovators were, how other writers were influenced by them over
time, and how their works influenced the larger society of scholars, scientists, and laypeople.
Examining the historic aspects of works over time helps establish a sense of the trends within the
genre, its evolution over time, its current state, and where it may be going.
This review incorporates the discussion of authors and their works into the discussions of
history and taxonomy of the genre. Nature writers and their works cannot be separated from their
historic matrix, the society in which they lived and wrote, how they reacted to the natural world,
Survey of Literature Modern British and American Nature Writing 7
human society, the technology of their time, and what sort of works they produced; these factors
partially determine how they fit into a taxonomy of the overall genre. In a special issue of
Technical Communications Quarterly devoted to science and nature writing, the guest editor
discusses this historic, locale-based matrix in terms of “[. . .] context, (which) becomes an active
agent that shapes thought and prose.” He points to this as the central theme that unites science
and nature writing, particularly for writers like Rachel Carson, who are willing “[. . .] to engage
with nature in a way that personally affects them, changes them” (Johnson-Sheehan, Bogard
365).
During its history in modern Britain and America, several sub-genres have emerged
within the larger genre of nature writing. These sub-genres, or types, provide a useful framework
for discussing the evolution of nature writing. In his anthology of American nature writing This
Incomperable Lande, (sic) Thomas J. Lyon organizes nature writing into various sub-genres
according to the balance that the works exhibit between, on one hand, describing natural history
in terms of facts, and on the other hand describing the writer’s experience (4). He organizes the
works along a continuum that begins with the more objective works—field guides—and at the
other end of the spectrum includes works in which the author explicitly expresses his or her
views on humans’ role in nature, for example John Burrough’s Accepting the Universe, in which
he begins his essay “The Natural Providence,” “What unthinking people call design in nature is
While nature writing, or writing about natural history, can be divided into various times,
trends, genres, and sub-genres, these divisions are fairly imprecise, as some authors write in
more than one genre, and some very different and influential writers were contemporaries of
Survey of Literature Modern British and American Nature Writing 8
each other. The various sub-genres also span a wide range of styles, from works that attempt to
be as objective as possible to works that are more philosophical and poetic. However, even the
most abstract of the works that are commonly characterized as nature writing are connected to
Dividing nature writing into some broad categories, while a somewhat artificial
distinction, helps provide a framework for understanding the various authors, historical periods,
and relationships. This section of the review provides an overview of these sub-genres, and some
Field guides, which are often published as series, are extremely popular resources with
both scientists and amateur naturalists. Designed in small format, for portability (some guides to
aquatic life are even waterproof), and used to identify some aspect of natural history, they are
typically illustrated, and include concise descriptions meant to aid in identification. They may
also include a taxonomic key. Modern field guides may be traced back to books like the Rev. D
descriptions, “[. . .] while fully in the tradition of natural theology, seldom wander far from the
The first, most popular, and most well-known modern field guide series (still in print)
was started in 1934 by Roger Tory Peterson. In A Guide to Field Guides, Diane Schmidt reflects
that it is “[. . .] difficult to comprehend [. . .] how thoroughly revolutionary his 1934 bird book
was.” Peterson was the one of the first, and certainly among the most well-known authors, to use
the term “field guide,” and to combine all the features of modern field guides together in a single
Most field guide series are written for amateur naturalists, and many for young people.
The foreword to Reptiles and Amphibians, one of the Golden Nature Guides, puts its purpose
very simply: “So many people of all ages want to know about snakes and turtles, frogs and
salamanders, that the Golden Nature Guides would be incomplete without an introduction to
Professional papers include documents such as forest management plans, which are used
in making decisions about natural resource management. The rhetorical, stylistic, and structural
features of these documents can have important and long-term practical consequences for natural
The defining characteristic of the natural history essay is that, whatever method is used
for presentation, the main point is to convey instruction in facts about nature, for example books
such as John Muir’s Studies in the Sierra, published in 1874–1875 (Lyon 5). Muir made several
significant contributions to the development of the American nature essay: he enlarged its scope
to include wild-country adventures (differentiating him from his contemporary, John Burroughs);
he developed the evolutionary and ecological content; and he introduced an element of militancy,
which, again, differentiated him from Burroughs, who was mostly content to be an observer and
Rachel Carson’s writing may also be classified in this category. In Silent Spring, “She
followed the classical approach to rhetoric: to please and to teach. It was because of her book’s
literary qualities that vast numbers of people eagerly read them. Science is the content, but art
enhances its communication and multiplies the persuasiveness of both the scientific argument
Rambles
Essays in which natural history and the author’s presence are more or less equally
important, as in many of John Burroughs’ works, constitute a “classic American form,” the
ramble (Lyon 5). This form typically concerns intense observation of a local environment, often
over an extended period of time, and the responses of the observer. Burroughs’ essays and
collections were extremely popular during the latter half of the nineteenth century. Annie
Dillard’s Pilgrim at Tinker Creek is another example of this sub-genre. These authors typically
are identified with a region, as Burroughs was identified with the Catskills.
Some elements of the ramble as a sub-genre can also be seen in the writings of Gilbert
White, whose Natural History of Selbourne (1789) records his deep engagement with studying
and writing about the natural history of a single locale for his entire life, and profoundly
Essays on experience in nature often include instruction in natural history facts, but this
type of essay also focuses on the writer as a protagonist—as one who exists in nature,
experiences it, and responds to it, more or less to the exclusion of other social contexts. This sub-
genre includes the writings of the seminal Henry David Thoreau, who wrote his classic Walden
in 1854. Among the few books that Thoreau considered worthy of his bookshelf was a copy of
Gilbert White’s A Natural History of Selbourne. Along with Walden, Thoreau wrote a number of
essays and letters, including A Natural History of Massachusetts, which begins: “Books of
natural history make the most cheerful winter reading. I read in Audubon with a thrill of delight,
when the snow covers the ground, of the magnolia, and the Florida keys, and their warm sea-
breezes [. . .]” (Bode 31). Thoreau was encouraged to write more natural science and less
Survey of Literature Modern British and American Nature Writing 11
philosophy by some of his contemporaries because of his keen powers of observation and
analysis. However, he went beyond the model that had been established by White, whom he read
and apparently admired, to add a dimension not previously seen in literature to the experience of
nature. He was also a contemporary and short-term follower of Louis Agassiz, the influential
scientist, but had no use for Agassiz’ methods, for example studying fish preserved in alcohol in
preference to the fish in its native brook (Walls 10). Thoreau, and other writers like him, for
example Edward Abbey, position themselves immediately and firmly in the narrative, making
their struggles with, and reactions to, the natural world a primary focus in their writing. Not
uncommonly, many of the nature writers also wrote about their reactions to other writers’
narratives of the natural world. Burroughs, for example, was involved in a famous “nature faker
controversy” which ultimately involved even then-president (and friend of Burroughs) Theodore
Shortly after Gilbert White’s Selbourne was published in 1789, William Bartram’s
Travels through North and South Carolina (1791) was published as a very early American
example of the travel and adventure narrative; even to the present time, it remains one of the few
important regional studies of the southeast. In an 1864 essay from the anthology A Century of
Early Ecocriticism, Henry Tuckerman, who was himself a naturalist (a prominent lichenologist,
to be precise) and writer, comments on Bartram’s Travels “The style is more finished than his
father (John Bartram, also a naturalist and writer) could command, more fluent and glowing, but
equally informed with that genuineness of feeling and directness of purpose which give the most
crude writing an indefinable but actual moral charm.” This type of early literary criticism of
be recognized as a “[. . .] discrete genre with its own criteria of literary excellence” (Mazel 20,
24).
Within the tradition of British and American nature writing can also be placed works on
agriculture, horticulture, and gardening, all activities that take place at the nexus between
humans and nature. Until fairly recently, most literary scholars tended to ignore nature writing,
and most scientists viewed natural history as quaint, but in Uneven Land: Nature and Agriculture
in American Writing, Stephanie L. Sarver notes that “The late 80s brought a refreshed attention
to environmental issues and literary study as scholars turned to nature writing—texts that had
hitherto been regarded as outside of the literary canon. Many embraced Thoreau as an exemplary
naturalist [. . .]”(6). Agricultural writing also includes contemporary writers such as Wendell
Berry, who, like Aldo Leopold, purchased a burned-out farm and began rehabilitating it, the
process of which is documented in many of his writings. As noted previously, the sense of the
writing being connected with a place, or locale, is central to these writer’s narratives.
specific time and place. For Berry, the locale in which he lives and farms is primary to his
writing and philosophy. The more significant works often explore difficult social and ethical
issues that arise from the relationship between humans and the land.
Sarver goes on to establish connections between agriculture, natural history, ecology, and
literature. The relationships between humans and the natural world are shaped in many ways by
agriculture and related activities, so it figures prominently in our literature. Many important
writers and works in natural history that are not specifically focused on agriculture are strongly
At the farthest end of the literary spectrum from the field guides and professional papers
are the analytic essays on man and nature, in which interpretation is primary and natural history
facts, as well as personal experiences, are secondary. Although these works may make the same
points as natural history or personal experience essays, these essays are more abstract (Lyon 7).
Burrough’s Accepting the Universe is an example of this type of more philosophical essay. In
this, one of his later works, he “[. . .] tries to find a balance between the scriptures he knew from
his parents and those he found in Darwin and Emerson, and in the natural world from his own
“Nature writing, as a recognizable and distinct tradition in English prose, has existed for
over two hundred years [. . .] Since World War II the genre has become an increasingly
significant and popular one, producing some of the finest nonfiction prose of our time” (Finch,
Elder 19).
Various sources place the beginnings of the nature writing genre in different places and
times, and with different authors and works. However, a survey of the anthologies and secondary
criticism reveals some commonly agreed-upon works and authors that were clearly important to
Nature writing has achieved a “[. . .] unique fullness and continuity within the Anglo-
American context.” This is because of a number of factors, including the influence of writers like
Linnaeus, the English literature of naturalist theology (in which authors primarily wrote about
nature in the context of it being evidence for the existence of God—His creation), the emergence
of an educated leisure class with an interest in nature, and the exploration of early America
Survey of Literature Modern British and American Nature Writing 14
(including commissioning of naturalists by both institutions and governments to travel, map, and
Linnaeus, with his Systema Naturae (1735), created, for the first time, a framework for
classifying and identifying all living things. His books went into the field with English and
American amateur naturalists, as well as explorers and collectors in the second half of the
eighteenth century and into the nineteenth. One of his readers, and the first commonly
acknowledged nature writer in English, is Gilbert White, whose Natural History of Selbourne
(1789) influenced both Darwin and Thoreau (Finch, Elder 19). White was the pastor of the
Southampton parish of Selbourne, where he lived his entire life and wrote a series of letters that
White’s importance to this genre may be hinted at in the fact that the authors who
followed him and used him as a model were referred to as “the Selbourne Cult.” “It was more
than a scientific-literary genre modeled after White’s pioneering achievement. A constant theme
of the nature essayists was the search for a lost pastoral haven, for a home in an inhospitable and
threatening world” (Finch, Elder 20). In “Tales of Locale: The Natural History of Selbourne and
Castle Rackrent,” Martha Adams Bohrer explains that “The ‘age of the naturalist’ in England
extended from [. . .] the work of Linnaeus after 1754 until the end of the nineteenth century [. . .]
This interest crossed all classes, from the [. . .] royal family [. . .] to [. . .] working-class botanical
societies in provincial towns. Literary critics in the twenty-first century have lost sight of this
important context so familiar to authors and readers in the nineteenth century” (393). She refers
to White’s and other authors’ works as “tales of locale,” implying a deep connection between the
writer and the locale in which they live. This was certainly true for White, who lived, explored,
Survey of Literature Modern British and American Nature Writing 15
and wrote in the same small parish (of about 700 residents) for his entire life. She refers to
White’s Selbourne as a “seminal, experimental text” and says that the “[. . .] natural history and
tales of locale generated a new understanding of places as natural and social environments.” She
also refers to his work as “radically new thick (and systemic) descriptions of locales.” He
innovated the representation of animal behavior in nature writing by modifying the more static
local histories that had been produced by his predecessors (394, 416).
This appraisal of White’s experimentalism and importance to the nature writing genre
agrees with many other literary critics’ and anthologists’ appraisals. Bohrer credits White with
several important innovations to a literary tradition that had become, by White’s time, “more
antiquarian and speculative than natural historical and empirical.” White divided his history by
method, with sections based on both direct field observations and textual research. The form he
used for his writing also allowed him the freedom of conversational organization, but still made
it clear that the content of the writing was essentially scientific (395).
Selbourne takes the form of a series of letters, which were the method that most scientists
used to share insights and discoveries before journals became prevalent. While the letters that
make up Selbourne appear casual, they were carefully edited and revised before publication.
White’s “[. . .] probing eyes and sensitive ears (generated) accurate, artful, amusing
representations and (offered) convincing evidence that ‘all nature is so full, that that district
produces the greatest variety which is the most examined’ ” (417). This intense study of a limited
locality was to be later taken up and turned into a uniquely American literary form by John
Burroughs, whose “rambles” around his native mountain New England farm country contrasted
sharply with the wild explorations of his contemporary, John Muir, who chose to spend many
years exploring (and almost dying in) some of the wildest parts of Canada and America.
Survey of Literature Modern British and American Nature Writing 16
White’s pastoral themes can be traced to the ancient literary traditions exemplified in
Theocritus’s Idylls and Virgil’s Eclogues. White, however, takes a more active role as naturalist
than the ancients, who were more interested in a temporary escape from the
“[. . .] world of cities, labor, and war” than in studying nature (Finch, Elder 21). White is
interested in discovering the landscape, observing, exploring, and documenting his findings in a
scientific, but also literary, manner. He was first English writer generally considered to be a
Among other authors and works, Darwin and his Origin of Species started a process of
evolution in scientific thought beyond Linnaeus’ relatively static hierarchies. Darwin’s work
stimulated a revolution in life science research; however, scientific writing shifted away from
Darwin’s own fairly accessible writing style and towards “A white-coated, impersonal style
(which) became the established voice of ‘objective science’.” After Darwin, nature writers who
have retained and embraced the older tradition of natural history have done so as exemplifying a
way to “[. . .] respond to the physical creation in ways that, while scientifically informed, are also
marked by a personal voice and concern for literary values” (Finch, Elder 22). This may be a
reaction against the more impersonal, objective writing style adopted by the scientific
community after Darwin. The contrast between these approaches could be seen in early
American science, between the objectively scientific approach of Louis Agassiz and that of his
In America, Thoreau was a “crucial figure” in mid-nineteenth century America, and not
only wrote some of the nature writing genre’s most influential, philosophical, and literary works,
Survey of Literature Modern British and American Nature Writing 17
but also anticipated its future growth into our own century. Just as White expanded on the
traditions of the ancient pastoralists, Thoreau expands on White’s earlier tradition by adding a
touch of “ironic awareness” to his writing that made it more appropriate to his audience and
times. Thoreau also introduced the idea of protecting the environment, perhaps the earliest
the first wave of industrialization of England—never even mentions it (Finch, Elder 22–23).
preconceptions of the knower inevitably inflected the knowledge of any object. [. . .] for Thoreau
the inflections became [. . .] the most significant part of the (scientific) process.” In her article
“Textbooks and Texts from the Brooks: Inventing Scientific Authority in America,” Laura
Dassow Walls talks about how Thoreau followed the methods of the influential scientist Louis
Agassiz for a short time, then rejected them: “Thoreau would remain [. . .] a ‘naturalist’ [. . .] for
all his fascination with and attention to science, Thoreau would not himself become a ‘scientist.’
He would, of course, become ‘literary’ ” (1). Aggasiz and Thoreau embodied a much older
conflict between science and literature, one that predated the uncertainty of postmodernism.
Walls point out that “The conflict Thoreau felt with the scientific authority of Agassiz has itself a
continuous history [. . .] the view that scientific truth is a human construct and must therefore be
contingent, not absolute, is not the sudden and shocking progeny of postmodernism, but has a
currency continuous with the development of science itself” (21). In these terms, Walls shows
how Agassiz’ modern and objective approach was discredited within his own lifetime, while
Thoreau’s literary approach to natural science is gaining increased attention in our postmodern
world, where objectivity is seen increasingly as difficult if not impossible, and perhaps not even
up with Thoreau.
John Burroughs and John Muir, contemporaries to each other, were guided at least in part
by the heritage of Gilbert White and Selbourne. Writers such as Burroughs and Muir provide
restoring to scientific inquiry some of the warmth, breadth, and piety which had been infused
The environmental movement began in the second half of the nineteenth century,
coinciding with the literary works of Burroughs and Muir, who both traced their literary roots
back to Thoreau, although each took the tradition in very distinct and personal directions.
Important political and industrial figures of the time, including Theodore Roosevelt and Harvey
Firestone, were influenced by these writer’s works, as well as by personal association (Finch,
Elder 23).
After Burroughs and Muir, writers like Rachel Carson and Aldo Leopold, both highly
trained scientists, started creating literary works that incorporated knowledge from the then-new
field of scientific ecology, and to try to place the new findings on ecology within a meaningful
social and ethical context—how modern man could and should try to live in a world that he has
the potential to alter significantly in ways that earlier writers did not consider (Finch, Elder 24).
Leopold was a graduate of the master’s program in forestry from Yale at the dawn of the
environmental management (Stewart 145). He had a brilliant career in the forest service, and yet
began to have doubts about the theories he had been taught, based on his personal experiences in
Survey of Literature Modern British and American Nature Writing 19
the field. In 1933 he became head of game management in the Department of Agricultural
Economics at the University of Wisconsin, where he began also to explore the surrounding
countryside—the same countryside that John Muir had tramped around a century earlier.
Leopold found an environment changed and degraded since the days of Muir. In 1948, A Sand
County Almanac was published, an account of his work to revive a burned-out farm that he had
management, practical field experience, and insightful thought. Toward the end, he sums up:
tends to ignore, and thus eventually to eliminate, many elements in the land community that lack
commercial value, but that are (as far as we know) essential to its healthy functioning [. . .] An
ethical obligation on the part of the private owner is the only visible remedy for these situations”
(Leopold 214). Leopold, like Carson, had the scientific background and practical field
experience to lend his work authority, a sense of ethical commitment to the environment, and the
Modern American nature writing encompasses a wide range of styles and authors,
including poets (Wendell Berry), novelists (Peter Matthiessen), and essayists (Barry Lopez).
Nature writing “[. . .] fuses literature’s attention to style, form, and the inevitable ironies of
expression with a scientific concern for palpable fact [. . .] nature writing asserts both the
humane value of literature and the importance to a mature individual’s relationship with the
world of understanding fundamental physical and biological processes” (Finch, Elder 25).
Edward Abbey embodies many of the trends and themes in current nature writing in his
work. In spite of being largely ignored by the eastern literary press, the paperback version of his
Survey of Literature Modern British and American Nature Writing 20
classic Desert Solitaire is in its sixteenth printing. Another example of the wide range of opinions
held by various authors classified as nature writers, Abbey is difficult to define in terms of
simply being a nature writer, even though his most important works are not separable from their
place and time, the American southwestern desert in the last part of the twentieth century. Nor
can they be separated from Abbey’s personal reactions to the environment and what he sees
happening to it. Abbey says in his preface to the 1988 reprint of Desert Solitaire: “I have never
looked inside a book by Muir or Burroughs and don’t intend to. The few such writers whom I
wholly admire are those, like Thoreau, who went far beyond simple nature writing to become
critics of society, of the state, or our modern industrial culture” (xi). With Abbey, it’s difficult to
tell when he is being literal, although it seems to be seldom; he likely would have a fairly high
environmental themes. Surveys of early ecocriticism show works dating from at least as early as
1864, so the practice of reading texts in terms of their connections to nature has a long history.
More recently, the term ecocriticism was coined by William Reueckert in his 1978 essay
“Literature and Ecology: An Experiment in Ecocriticism.” Reuckert’s essay was later included in
Cheryl Glotfelty’s Ecocriticism Reader (1996), in which she observes that “ecologically
informed criticism” had been extant at least since the 1970s (Mazel 1). So, while something that
could be characterized as ecocriticism has been developing in British and American literary
criticism for well over 100 years, beginning around the late 1970s it has begun to be more
defined and developed as a distinct discipline within literary criticism. ASLE provides an
“Introduction to Ecocriticism” page on their internet site that includes links to a variety of
Survey of Literature Modern British and American Nature Writing 21
articles in journals such as the PMLA, as well as popular magazines such as The Nation, that
provide extended definitions of, and different perspectives on, modern ecocriticism, and examine
its importance in the current world of literature, as well as to a more popular audience. From the
volume and variety of articles, one can infer that ecocriticism has attracted serious interest from a
a Place for Professional Communication,” M. Jimmie Killingsworth surveys some of the more
particularly interested in the works and aspects of ecocomposition related to technical and
professional writing, but his survey, and his observations on ecocomposition in general, echo a
number of themes that been developing in British and American nature writing for over 200
years. He observes that there was a “[. . .] tendency to classify environmental concerns topically
and vocationally [. . .],” which led to most writers identified with environmental rhetoric,
scientific rhetoric, and technical communication to produce books that focused on specifically
environmental themes. Killingsworth points out that ecocritics, in the quest to make their work
“special and different,” created a “canon of privileged texts,” for example the essays of Thoreau.
He characterizes this “professionalization of the environment” as leading to the idea that only
certain groups—nature writers, for example—are concerned with the environment and ecology,
and says that this specialization follows the trend of modernism in general (361, 362).
Killingsworth shows that writers like Rachel Carson contributed to a body of literature
that was primarily focused on disaster themes, and nature, as viewed in much current
environmental discourse studies, is seen as “[. . .] not so much the source and setting of life, but
as a problem or [. . .] disaster waiting to happen [. . .]” (363). He distinguishes between the fields
Survey of Literature Modern British and American Nature Writing 22
of environmental rhetoric, ecocriticism, and environmental communication, and also shows that
they all seem to have shared a focus on nature as a problem to solve. He goes on to suggest some
new possibilities.
several sources that establish and explore this theme. He mentions a number of literary scholars
that are developing the approach to teaching writing known as ecocomposition and finds that
“For them, ecology becomes something more than a set of themes that occupy the attention of a
special group of authors and texts,” in contrast to the prevalent perception of both the popular
readers and most ecocritics. Criticizing the tendency of professional communications studies to
focus on workplaces and global communities, he emphasizes the importance of place, or locale,
in writing, continuing themes started by Gilbert White with Selbourne in the late eighteenth
century. He offers some guidelines for a new pedagogy of teaching writing using the principles
curriculum (370).
The specific contributions and important points of the various books, book articles,
journal articles, primary, and secondary sources are detailed in the discussions of taxonomy and
history, but the following general summary helps provide some perspective on the sources in
The anthologies in general establish important guidelines for what authors and works are
considered important, and some explanation of why they are important. The anthologies also
provide historical context, organizing works in order of publication. They show how the works
Survey of Literature Modern British and American Nature Writing 23
and their authors are interrelated, both in the sense of the authors’ relationships to their works,
and in the sense of the authors’ influences on each other, sometimes as contemporaries,
sometimes over time. They also help to establish taxonomies of nature writing, organizing the
works into broad sub-genres, which helps to provide some framework for studying them (Lyon
3).
The various secondary articles provide scholarly insights into the historic importance of
each author and work that they examine. They provide historic details and compare the authors
to other writers on the basis of similarities and differences. This sort of comparison sometimes
leads to interesting connections among authors and works, and suggests directions for future
research that may have been previously unsuspected. The critical articles can also provide
detailed theoretical discussions and analyses of the primary sources, which help clarify why
Sometimes articles are collected into anthologies of literary criticism for important
authors; for example Coyote in the Maze is a collection of critical essays on Edward Abbey’s
writing. In Coyote, Claire Lawrence contributes an analysis titled “Getting the Desert into a
Book” that addresses the problems nature writing encounters in representation of reality in a
postmodern world. She makes the point that while poststructuralists and eco-critics may seem to
have little in common, the poststructuralist recognition that part of the problem in literary
representation, a “[. . .] rupture in the relationship between word and object” is a problem that
nature writers are very familiar with. While poststructuralists consider eco-critics as simplistic
and eco-critics see poststructuralists as nihilists, there may still be some common philosophical
ground between them in terms of what is real and meaningful (Quigley 150). An understanding
of critical viewpoints such as this in terms of current theory and scholarship is important to any
Survey of Literature Modern British and American Nature Writing 24
Some articles and books are more insightful, focused, and important to understanding a
specific aspect of nature writing than others. The books and articles included in this review were
selected as being significant works in the field, partly because of references by scholarly
recommends Lyon’s text as being one of the more important anthologies of nature writing, both
for his useful commentary as well as his selection of representative material. Killingsworth’s
article seemed particularly significant in terms of addressing current themes, and in expanding on
current thinking in ecocriticism and professional communication in a way that leads to some
practical insights on raising environmental awareness in general. This raising of awareness goes
back to the themes that Gilbert White explored in Selbourne, and that have been continued by
authors as diverse as Thoreau, Muir, Burroughs, Carson, and Abbey into our current century.
Nature writing is a vital and growing area of literature and literary studies, with rich
possibilities for future studies to contribute to the understanding of various aspects of nature
Ecocriticism seems to be the dominant force in current literary criticism of nature writing,
and the practice of ecocomposition seems to be becoming more widespread within the practice of
teaching composition in general. Current nature writers seem to be evolving their writing to be
appropriate and relevant for our current century, and yet retain many of the elements that have
historically characterized this genre, and in fact even celebrating them as being an antidote to
some of the flaws in modern literary criticism and scholarly writing. The ideas that writing is
based in a specific locale, that writing belongs to a time and place, that nature can be
Survey of Literature Modern British and American Nature Writing 25
characterized in ways that allow us to make sense of it in human terms, that humans can make
sense of their relation to nature, that humans can influence the state of nature through writing
about it—all these ideas seem to be taken up by current nature writers, and developed in terms of
our current times. With the developing science of scientific ecology and the recognition that
nature writing is a valid genre, with scientific as well as literary value, nature writing could be
With digital technologies, not only the writing, but the presentation and physical form of
nature writing texts could undergo a radical change. There is already a tradition within nature
writing of integrating text and illustrations, either drawings, paintings, or photographs, for
example the work of Peter Matthiessen with the photographer Eliot Porter (The Tree Where Man
was Born/The African Experience), the various types of illustrated field guides (for example, the
Golden Nature Guides and Peterson Field Guides), and the “popular natural science” articles,
magazines, and books, for example The World We Live In, which was originally published as a
The field guide/popular natural science book model seems most suited to extension using
the newer technologies of multimedia and presentation on screens. There are already projects
underway to digitize collections of specimens and early texts and make them available over the
internet. For example, at the Academy of Natural Science’s Albert M. Greenfield digital imaging
center, the Academy’s entire stock of collections is being digitized for distribution over the
internet. The Macphail Woods Ecological Forestry project on Prince Edward Island has created
an online “field” guide that could represent a growing trend toward publishing natural history
The subject of nature writing offers a wide range of possibilities for future studies that
would be interesting from a scholarly viewpoint, as well as practical in the sense of professional
writing and literature accomplishing work in the world. The following list represents a few
• International nature writing—studies of how various languages and cultures have represented
nature in literature.
colonies in India and other locales. For example, this area of study could include literature
such as surveys of Indian wildlife written in the days of the British colonies; this type of
• Gilbert White, Burroughs, and others writers in the genre considered writers of rambles and
locale-based writing—studies of locale seem to run through the entire history of nature
writing, and seem to still be important to current writers and theorists in the field of
• Agricultural writing—studies along the lines of the literature of sustainable agriculture and
appropriate technology.
projects, and other related projects, comparing and contrasting these newer presentation
Nature writing has a history that reaches back, in the British and American tradition, at
Survey of Literature Modern British and American Nature Writing 27
least to the late eighteenth century. It has evolved into many forms over the years, and has been
the chosen genre for many important writers. Common themes, for example, locale, have
emerged and remained important for the genre since its beginnings. Nature writing, and the
ecocomposition—has been, and continues to be, important to scholars and laypeople alike, as
they seek the answers to the basic questions that were formed at the beginning of the discipline:
What is the character of non-human nature; what is the harmony of nature; how do human
themes relate to this harmony; and what is humanity’s proper role in nature? (Botkin, vii, 16).
These are themes that have still not been fully explored, and future nature writers and scholars of
nature writing will continue to add their insights to this area of literary studies.
Survey of Literature Modern British and American Nature Writing 28
Works Cited
Albert M. Greenfield Digital Imaging Center for Collections. Acad. of Natural Sciences. 27 Jun
2005. <http://www.acnatsci.org/library/greenfield/index.html>.
ASLE bibliography. Assn. for Study of Lit. and Environment. 27 Nov 2005.
<http://www.asle.umn.edu/archive/biblios/biblios.html>.
ASLE Introduction to Ecocriticism. Assn. for Study of Lit. and Environment. 4 Dec 2005.
<http://www.asle.umn.edu/archive/intro/intro.html>.
Bode, Carl, ed. The Portable Thoreau. New York: Viking P, 1947.
Bohrer, Martha Adams. “Tales of Locale: The Natural History of Selbourne and Castle
Botkin, Daniel B. Discordant Harmonies: A New Ecology for the Twenty-First Century. New
Bryson, Michael A. “Nature, Narrative, and the Scientist-Writer: Rachel Carson’s and Loren
Finch, Robert, and John Elder, ed. The Norton Book of Nature Writing. New York: Norton,
1990.
International Field Guides: A Web Supplement to “A Guide to Field Guides” by Diane Schmidt.
<http://www.library.uiuc.edu/bix/fieldguides/main.htm>.
Johnson-Sheehan, Richard and Paul Bogard. “Landscape and Text: The Central Role of Context
368.
14 (2005): 359–373.
Leopold, Aldo. A Sand County Almanac. New York: Oxford UP, 1949.
Lyon, Thomas J., ed. This Incomperable Lande: A Book of American Nature Writing. New
Macphail Woods Ecological Forestry Project: Guides. Macphail Woods Ecological Forestry
Matthiessen, Peter. Tigers in the Snow. New York: North Point, 2000.
— and Eliot Porter. The Tree Where Man Was Born/The African Experience. New York:
Dutton, 1972.
McGill, Kathleen. “Field Study and the Rhetoric Curriculum.” Technical Communication
National Museum of Natural History Library. Smithsonian Inst. lib. 27 Nov 2005.
<http://www.sil.si.edu/libraries/nmnh-hp.htm>.
Owens, Mark and Delia. Cry of the Kalahari: An American Couple’s Seven Years in Africa’s
Quigley, Peter, ed. Coyote in the Maze: Tracking Edward Abbey in a World of Words. Salt Lake
Sarver, Stephanie. Uneven Land: Nature and Agriculture in American Writing. Lincoln: U of
Nebraska P, 1999.
Schmidt, Diane. A Guide to Field Guides: Identifying the Natural History of North America.
Sherman, Charles L., ed. Nature’s Wonders in Full Color. Garden City, New York: Hanover
House, 1956.
Stewart, Frank. A Natural History of Nature Writing. Washington, D.C.: Island, 1995.
Thompson, Edward K., ed. The World We Live In. New York: Time, 1955.
Waddell, Craig, ed. And No Birds Sing: Rhetorical Analyses of Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring.
Walker, Charlotte Zoe, ed. Sharp Eyes: John Burroughs and American Nature Writing. Syracuse:
Walls, Laura Dassow. “Textbooks and Texts from the Brooks: Inventing Scientific Authority in
Wiley, Farida A, ed. . John Burroughs’ America: Selections From the Writings of the Naturalist
Zim, Herbert S. Reptiles and Amphibians: A Guide to Familiar American Species. New York:
Golden, 1956.