Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Chapter 2: Deixis
Person deixis
I / you / he, she, it
honorifics (sometimes described as social deixis)
T/V distinction
rd
people can use 3 person when addressing somebody in order to put even more distance
between each other in order to create humor / scold that person / ...
we can be exclusive or inclusive. The addressee may or may not be included within the we
(We can clean up here)
Spatial deixis
basic distinction: here and there
some others: yonder (more distant from s), hither (to that place), thence (from that place)
some verbs of motion, such as com and go retain a deictic sense when they are used to mark
movement toward the speaker (Come to bed! - to the speaker, Go to bed! - away from the
speaker)
deictic projection:
location from s's perspective can be fixed mentally as well as physically. Ss temporarily
away from their home will often continue to use 'here' to mean the (physically distant)
home.
Ss also project themselves into other locations prior to actually being in those locations (I'll
come later)
so we can say things like I am not here now and they actually make sense
the basis of spatial deixis = psychological distance (eg, a speaker my wish to mark something
that is physically close, for example a perfume being sniffed, as psychologically distant I don't
like that)
Temporal deixis
proximal: now
distal: then (past and future)
expressions like yesterday, tomorrow, today, tonights, next week, last week, this week... depend
on knowing the relevant utterance time (deictic center)
if somebody scribbles back in an hour on a piece of paper and we don't know when did
they scribble it, we don't know how long we are going to wait.
Also psychologically based: this (coming) weekend
the past tense: distant
something that is treated as extremely unlikely (or impossible) from the speaker's current
1
situation is also marked via the distal (past tense) from: I could swim (when I was I child). I
could be in Hawaii (if I had a lot of money).
If clauses use past tense
it can be distance either from current time or from current reality or facts
Discourse deixis
former / latter; above / below; previously / next
Have you heard this one?
That was the funniest story I ever heard
Previously on West Wing...
In the next chapter, we consider the role of deixis
This sentence is not true
Social deixis
encodes the social relationship between speaker and hearer(s) or between speaker and some
other referent, overlaps with personal deixis
Your Reverence / Sir / Professor Smith / Mr. Jones / Johnny / darling.
deictic center = speaker, moment of speech, speaker's location, current point in discourse,
speaker's social position relative to other participant roles.
presupposition: something the speaker assumes to be the case prior to making an utterance.
Speakers, not sentences, have presuppositions
entailment: something that logically follows from what is asserted in the utterance. Sentences,
not speakers, have entailments.
Presupposition
a relationship between two propositions.
Mary's dog is cute Mary has a dog. Mary's dog isn't cute Mary has a dog.
P q, NOT p q.
This property of presup = constancy under negation
presup of a statement will remain constant (true) even when that statement is negated
Types of presupposition
words, phrases, structures = potential presup, which can only become actual presup in contexts
with speakers
existential presup: possessive construction is associated with a presup of existence
(your car you have a car)
also assumed in any definite noun phrase (the King of Sweden the King of Sweden
exists)
factive presup: the presupposed info following a verb like know can be treated as a fact
(Everybody knows that John is gay)
2
Ordered entailments
a logical concept:
Rover chased three squirrels:
Something chased three squirrels,
Rover did something to three squirrels
Rover chased three of something
Something happened.
= Background entailments. S will communicate, typically by stress, which of these
entailments is assumed to be in the foreground.
Foreground entailment:
Rover chased THREE squirrels, ROVER chased three squirrels
similar function: it-cleft construction
It was Rover that chased the squirrels.
Hedges
in connection with the maxim of quality: expressions we use when we need to suggest that
what we say may not exactly be accurate.
As far as I know, they're married. They are married, I guess.
In relation with the quantity maxim:
As you probably know, I am terrified of bugs. So, to cut a long story short, we grabbed our
stuff and ran.
In relation with the maxim of relation:
can be found in the middle of s's talk when they things like Oh, by the way and go on to
mention some potentially unconnected information during a conversation.
anyway to suggest the ss may have drifted in the discussion
I don't know if this is important, but some of the files are missing.
in connection with the maxim of relation (manner):
This may be a bit confused, but I remember being in a car. I'm not sure if this makes sense,
but the car had no lights. I don't know if this is clear at all, but I think the other car was
reversing.
Conversational implicature
Charlene: I hope you brought the bread and the cheese.
Dexter: Ah, I brought the bread.
Dexter expects Charlene to realize he didn't bring the cheese conversational
implicature. Flouting the maxim of quantity.
Generalized conversational implicatures
no special knowledge is required in the context to calculate the additional conveyed meaning
(the Charlene and Dexter example)
any phrase with an indefinite article: an X not speaker's X
I was sitting in a garden one day. (it wasn't my garden)
If the speaker was capable of being more informative (following the quantity maxim), he or
she would have said my garden.
Scalar implicatures
certain information is always communicated by choosing a word which expresses one value
from a scale of values.
All, most, many, some, few
always, often, sometimes
when producing an utterance, a speaker selects the word from the scale which is the most
informative and truthful (quantity and quality) in the circumstances
scalar implicature: when any form in a scale is asserted, the negative of all forms higher on the
scale is implicated:
I have completed some of the required courses ( not all, not most, not many, not few but
some)
They are sometimes really interesting ( not always, not often)
when speakers correct themselves on some detail, they typically cancel one of the scalar
implicatures
I got some of this jewelry in Hong Kong um actually I think I got most of it there. (not
5
all)
Particularized conversational implicatures
derived from context
Rick: Hey, coming to the wild party tonight?
Tom: My parents are visiting.
In order to make Tom's response relevant, Rick has to draw on some assumed
knowledge that one college student in this setting expects another to have.
By far the most common typically just called implicatures
flouting the maxim of manner:
Ann: Where are you going with the dog?
Sam: To the V-E-T.
Sam expects Ann will know that the dog might understand the word vet and be
anxious about it.
Flouting the maxim of relation:
Leila: Whoa! Has your boss gone crazy? (seeing all the paperwork)
Mary: Let's go get some coffee.
Bert: Do you like ice-cream?
Ernie: Is the Pope Catholic? (maybe even manner: answering a question with a question)
Properties of conversational implicatures
CI are deniable. S can deny them.
You have won five dollars (ONLY five)
to deny this implicature, s can say: You have won five dollars, that's four more than one!
Implicatures can be calculated by the listeners via inference
CI can be calculated, suspended, canceled, and reinforced. None of these properties apply to
conventional implicatures
Conventional implicatures
not based on the cooperative principle or the maxims They don't have to occur in conversation,
they don't depend on special contexts for their interpretation.
Associated with specific words and result in additional conveyed meanings when those words
are used
the word but: p but q p & q plus an implicature of contrast
the word even: implicature of contrary to expectation (Even John came nobody
expected he would come)
the word yet: implicature that the present situation is expected to be different at a later
time (Dennis isn't here yet he will be there later)
the word and:
Mary was happy and ready to work (p plus q)
X
She put on her clothes and left the house (q after p)
Speech Act Theory: developed by John Austin (How To Do Things With Words, 1962) and
John Searle
speech acts: actions performed via utterances (apology, complaint, compliment, invitation,
promise, request,...)
the circumstances, including others' utterances, around the speech act = the speech event.
It is the nature of the speech event that determines the interpretation of an utterance as
6
Impoliteness
by Jonathan Culpeper
impoliteness: communicative strategies that attack one's interlocutor and cause disharmony
bald on-record impoliteness: FTA is performed in a direct, clear, unambiguous and concise
way when face is not irrelevant or minimsed.
Different than an on-record FTA ('I want some beer' is not particularly insulting)
positive impoliteness: damaging the addressee's positive face
ignore, exclude from activity, disassociate, use inappropriate identity markers or honorifics,
use obscure or secretive language, seek disagreement, use taboo words, call the other names
negative impoliteness: damaging the addressee!s negative face
frighten, condescend or ridicule, invade the other's space (not giving the opportunity to
contribute to the talk, for example), explicitly associate the other with a negative aspect
withhold politeness: the absence of politeness work where it would be expected (e.g refusing to
thank somebody)
Preference structure divides second parts into preferred and dispreferred social acts
Assessment agree (disagree dispreferred), invitation accept (refuse dispreferred),...
if there is silence from the other's part, it usually indicates the other would say a dispreferred
second part. By being silent, the other invites the speaker to correct his or her initial statement.
Sandy: But I'm sure they'll have good food there. (1.6 seconds)
Sandy: Hmm I guess the food isn't great.
Jack: Nah people mostly go for the music.
Silence can be seen as non-participation, though, whereby people, when turning to a
dispreferred part, mitigate it by uhs and ums or repetition and hesitation, for example.
Dispreferred second part for an invitation: Oh, I'd love to, but...
how to do a dispreferred:
delay/hesitate (pause, er, em, ah)
preface (well, oh)
express doubt (I'm not sure, I don't know)
token Yes (I'd love to)
apology (I'm sorry)
mention obligation (I mus do X)
appeal for understanding (you see, you know)
make it non-personal (everybody else, out there)
give an account (too much work, no time left)
use mitigators (really, mostly, sort of, kinda)
hedge the negative (I guess not, not possible)
to express the preferred is faster expresses closeness (the end of the utterance is closer to its
beginning)
a tool for evading dispreferreds: pre-sequences
Repair in conversation
Institutional talk analysis (Shegloff et al. They scrutinized most notably the classroom
environment)
repair = correcting in conversation
structuring of repair:
self-initiated self-repair
A: She was giving me a list of all the students from this year. I mean last year.
B: Yeah
other-initiated self-repair
A: Well I'm working through the Amfat Corporation
B: The who?
A: The Amfat Corporation. It's a holding company.
Other-initiated other-repair
A: But you know single beds are awfully thin.
B: What?
A: Single beds. They're B: You mean narrow?
A: Narrow, yeah.
Self-initiated other-repair
A: That guy... what was his name... Bolz...
B: Bolzman
A: Bolzman
'Birmingham school': classroom interaction
3 basic moves (IRF):
initiating moves (I)
inform. Gives information (The purple ones are the taller ones)
13
(wife to a husband, who has a herring): Bring some out, so that Max c'd have some
too.
S wants the action carried out and that there is a need for the action to be carried out
S has the authority or the right to get H to carry the action
advisives
I warn you not to stick your nose into other people's business
A: Don't pick it up, it's burning hot
B: All right.
Why don't you call to New York and ask for a copy?
S believes that there is a need for the advocated action
S believes that the advocated action is in the interest of H
Informatives
reports
A: My spoken English students are going to take me out to dinner and we can B: Thats nice.
A: Oh yes, it is.
S believes that the expressed proposition is true and that the expressed proposition is
indeed true
it is not obvious that H knows about the event or state of affairs
assessments
A: And I thought that he was very professional about it.
B: Oh he IS very professional, he is good.
expressives
A: Welcome back to Hong Kong.
B: Thank you.
X: I hope you feel better.
Y: Thank you, I do.
Ethnography of communication
key figure: Dell Hymes
background in anthropology (ethnography = investigating cultures using participant observation
and interviews)
any given language use is analyzed (using participant observation and interviews) as part of a
whole social situation. Language is not separated from its setting.
Hymes: people have communicative competence = they know how to use language in a
contextually appropriate way
(Chomsky: people have linguistic competence = they know the grammar somehow)
Hymes: speech events have a set of components which the analyst needs to look at in order to
produce a satisfactory description of any particular speech event:
SPEAKING grid to help analysts to deal with situations being analyzed:
Setting where the speech event is located in time and space
Participants who takes part in the speech event, and in what role (speaker, addressee,
audience, eavesdropper)
Ends what purpose of the speech event is, and what its outcome is meant to be
Act sequence what speech acts make up the speech event, and what order they are
performed in
Key the tone of manner of performance (serious / joking, sincere / ironic,...)
Instrumentalities: what channel or medium of communication is used (speaking,
signing, writing, drumming, whistling) and what language / variety is selected from the
participant's repertoire
Norms of interaction what the rules are for producing and interpreting speech acts.
What is expected, what is allowed.
Genres what 'type' does a speech event belong to, and what other pre-existing
15
16