Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
The Fluid Catalytic Cracking (FCC) process has many complex interactions
between catalyst, hardware, feed, and products.
When a problem arises, the first step must be to define the problem.
Consider any changes that occurred near the time the problem was first
observed.
A: Definition of Problem
High Catalyst Loss Rate
Are losses from the reactor, regen., or both?
From one vessel
mechanical or operation problem
From both vessels
problem
A: Definition of Problem
High Catalyst Loss Rate, cont.
A: Definition of Problem
High Catalyst Loss Rate, cont.
Additional questions:
Has there been a change in the particle size of the
escaping catalyst?
When were the high cat. losses first observed?
Did the change occur suddenly or gradually?
POTENTIAL CAUSES
High velocity stream in
dense phase (>70 m/s)
Soft catalyst
INITIAL ACTION
Reduce velocities
(replace missing RO,
close bypass valves,
reduce stripping steam)
Test catalyst attrition
POTENTIAL CAUSES
INITIAL ACTION
Reduce cyclone velocity
nd
POTENTIAL CAUSES
INITIAL ACTION
Either increase
operating pressure
or accept higher
losses
Increase operating
pressure until
losses reach an
acceptable level
10
B: Definition of Problem
Poor Catalyst Circulation
11
B: Definition of Problem
Poor Catalyst Circulation, cont.
12
Catalyst Circulation
Troubleshooting Check List
OBSERVED DATA
POTENTIAL CAUSES
INITIAL ACTION
Poor regeneration
Change in yields
Poorer stripping
Coarse catalyst
Loss of fines
No catalyst withdrawals
Unsteady standpipe P
High regen. holdup
Hole in standpipe
Erosion / Corrosion
Review operating
history and standpipe
design
13
Catalyst Circulation
Troubleshooting Check List, cont.
OBSERVED DATA
POTENTIAL CAUSES
INITIAL ACTION
Aeration changes
Remove water from
aeration system
Check SV system
Improper aeration
Water in aeration medium
Water in steam lines
Malfunctioning cat. slide
valve actuators
14
C: Definition of Problem
Poor Product Yields
OBSERVED DATA
High H2 yield
High coke yield
Higher riser velocities
Overloaded gas
compressor
POTENTIAL CAUSES
INITIAL ACTION
16
POTENTIAL CAUSES
INITIAL ACTION
Poor stripping
Poor feed vaporization
OBSERVED DATA
Low catalyst activity
POTENTIAL CAUSES
INITIAL ACTION
18
POTENTIAL CAUSES
Coarse catalyst
Loss of fines
No catalyst withdrawals
INITIAL ACTION
Review regen. ops.
Use finer catalyst
Increase cat. addition
Change in riser P
Adjust pumparound
duties
Check steam rates
Review MC operation
and internals
19
Conclusions
20
21
22
10.00
1.00
0.10
0.01
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
23
25
DIPLEG FLUX
100-150 lb/ft-sec
for Riser and
Regen 1st stage
cyclones
75 lbs/ ft-sec for
Upper and Regen
2nd Stage
cyclones
26
27
Weld Cracks
Crossover Duct Cracks
Vortex Termination
Catalyst/Vapor Entrainment
28
Dipleg Erosion
Caused by
vortex
being
pushed
into top of
dipleg
EXTREME
LY
common!
29
Localized Erosion
Gouge in refractory
through to metal
Caused by shape of
inlet horn
this case is minor
30
Approximately 1 of
coke has formed on
the outlet tube
INSIDE the reactor
cyclone
You MUST remove
this if found during
an inspection
VERY likely to fall
off on start up and
plug the dipleg
31
32
Cyclones are listed as one of the top three reasons why FCCUs end
runs early
Many people run higher than design inlet velocities
This is not unacceptable
It does carry inherent risk of ending a run early due to mechanical
damage
Units can run for an extended time period with cyclone damage, but
need to be aware of:
fluidization effects due to loss of small particles
potential safety issues
added headache of catalyst management
33
LT. ENDS
PRODUCTS
FLUE GAS
TRC
TPA
REACTOR
HCN
PRODUCT
REGENERATOR
MPA
BPA
LRC
STRIPPER
Steam
MAIN
COLUMN
LCO
PRODUCT
AIR
OIL FEED
STEAM
STEAM
AIR
RECYCLE
34
DCO PRODUCT
REGENERATOR
STRIPPER
RISER
FEED
STEAM
STEAM
STEAM
STEAM
AIR
STEAM
AIR
35
Gas
GasInlet
InletDuct
Duct
Barrel
Barrel
Stage
1st
Stage
Dust
DustHopper
Hopper
Cone
Cone
Dipleg
Dipleg
Flapper
FlapperValve
Valve
36