Jaypee Business School

Constituent of Jaypee Institute of Technology

A-10, Sector-6, Noida-201307 (U.P)
Tel: 91-120-2400973-975 Fax: 91-120-2400986

IISB Assignment B
Kumar Mayank - 14609038
Item - 24 (Management Report)

8/16/2015

Management Report: The effect of management

practices on productivity
Kumar Mayank, Jaypee Business School, NOIDA, India

Abstract
The reason for the paper is to discover new approach for the powerful estimation of an
organization's management works on, permitting them to be contrasted specifically and genuine
business

performance.

This

paper

is

taking

into

account

http://cep.lse.ac.uk/management/Management_Practice_and_Productivity.pdf

the

article

distributed

in

November 2007 by Nick Bloom (Stanford University), Stephen Dorgan and John Dowdy (McKinsey &
Company), John Van Reenen (Center for Economic Performance, London School of Economics).
Multinational organizations have been compelled to take an efficient way to deal with management.
Just by having solid, viable management rehearses set up have they possessed the capacity to imitate
the same norms of execution crosswise over distinctive areas, societies and markets. Today, they are
procuring the advantages of this exertion as far as higher profitability, better profits for capital and
more strong development.
Governments can have impact in empowering the take-up of good management conduct. Doing as
such may be the absolute most practical method for enhancing the performance of their economies.
Solid rivalry and adaptable work markets both lead straightforwardly to enhanced management
performance. Multinational organizations have an in number constructive outcome as well, and their
impact is felt all through the locales in which they work.
Constant change in instructive benchmarks is likewise crucial. Better-oversaw firms require all the
more exceedingly talented laborers and they improve utilization of them, while better instructed
chiefs will be a key part of the execution change that both built up and rising economies must
attempt on the off chance that they are to keep up and enhance their worldwide focused position.
Keywords: Management Reports, Management Practices, Management Productivity

1|Page

Introduction
Management reporting is the process of providing agency management with timely, accurate and
relevant information that is designed to assist in the strategic and operational management of an
agency.
Under proper management, the high risk, hazard and fluffy property privileges of intangibles can be
influences into extensive quality.
The achievement of any business undertaking depends essentially on procuring income that would
produce adequate assets for sound development. To accomplish this goal, the management ought to
release its capacities proficiently and successfully. The reporting frameworks are profoundly valuable
to the management for successful arranging and control. A standard arrangement of reporting is
considered as a superior direction for brief choice making. Subsequently, it is important to have a
decent management reporting framework.

Objectives of Management Reporting

(1) To obtain the required information relating to the business to discharge its managerial functions
of planning, organizing, controlling, directing, and decision making etc. efficiently and effectively.
(2) To ensure the operational efficiency of the concern.
(3) To facilitate the maximum utilization of resources.
(4) To secure industrial understanding among people who are engaged in various aspects of work of
enterprise.
(5) To motivate for improving discipline and morale.
(6) To help the management for effective decision making.

Essentials of Good Reporting System

The accompanying are the essentials of a decent management reporting framework:
(1) Proper Form: A great report ought to have a thorough structure with suggestive title, heading,
sub heading and number of sections as and where essential for simple and fast reference.
(2) Contents: Simplicity is one of the essentials of reporting in connection to the substance of a
report. Further the substance ought to take after a consistent grouping. Wherever important the
substance ought to be spoken to as visual guides, for example, graphs and outlines and so forth.

2|Page

(3) Promptness: It implies that the framework ought to guarantee the planning and accommodation
of report at the best possible time. It encourages business officials to settle on suitable choices in
view of speedy reports as soon as possible.
(4) Accuracy: Information passed on ought to be exact. This implies that the individual in charge of
reporting ought to have adequate consideration in setting up the report as accurately as could be
allowed inside of the parameters of feasible precision in such manner.
(5) Comparability: With a specific end goal to guarantee that the outfitted data is helpful, it is vital
that reports are likewise implied for examination. The report ought to give data about both the
genuine and the planned execution of the monetary allowance period. So that significant
examination can be made to discover the deviations and to start fitting activity.
(6) Consistency: keeping in mind the end goal to make a significant and valuable correlation,
uniform bookkeeping standards and techniques ought to be taken after on steady premise over a
stretch of time for gathering, characterization and presentation of bookkeeping data.
(7) Relevancy: The report ought to be given significant information to uncover the certainty in
unambiguous terms. Consideration of both the applicable and the unimportant information in the
administration reports may bring about flawed choices.
(8) Simplicity: The report ought to be beyond what many would consider possible in basic structure.
As it were, the report ought to stay away from specialized languages, duplication of work and
exhibited in a basic style.
(9) Flexibility: The framework ought to be fit for being balanced by prerequisite of the clients.
(10) Cost-Benefit Analysis: Cost-Benefit Analysis ought to be made and the expense of reporting
ought to comparable with the consumption included.
(11) Principle of Exception: Since the time and exertion of administrative work force are valuable,
the rule of administration by exemption has turned into the standard of the day rather than special
case. It is important along these lines to draw the consideration of administration, through reports,
just towards outstanding matters.
(12) Controllability: It is essential that each report ought to be tended to an obligation focus and
investigated the elements into controllable and wild independently. So that the leader of the
obligation focus can be considered mindful just for controllable fluctuation however not for changes
which are outside his ability to control.
3|Page

Order of Management Reporting

Essentially, there are two approaches to management reporting. They are
(1) Oral Report and
(2) Written Report.
The Written Reports may be arranged into number of ways. The accompanying are the imperative
sorts:
I. As per Objects:
(A) External Reports: These reports arranged for persons outside the business, for example,
Government, shareholders, brokers, speculators and budgetary establishments and so on. Outer
Reports typically distributed reports on annual basis. Yearly reports of exchanging, Profit and Loss
Accounts and Balance Sheet of the Indian Companies are to be arranged as per Schedule VI of the
Indian Companies Act of 1956.
(B) Internal Reports: Internal Reports are those which are readied for inward employments for
distinctive level of management. It is likewise called as Management Reports. These reports are not
implied for exposure to the individuals who are outcasts to the business. They don't need to agree to
any statutory necessities.
From the management perspective the reports can be grouped into the accompanying classifications:
(1) Reports Meant for Top Management
(2) Reports Meant for Middle Level Management
(3) Reports Meant for Junior Level Management
II. As indicated by Period:
(A) Routine Reports
(B) Special Reports
III. As indicated by Functions:
(A) Operating Reports
(1) Control Reports
(2) Information Reports
(3) Venture Measurement Reports
(B) Financial Reports
(1) Static Reports
(2) Dynamic Reports

4|Page

The

accompanying

diagram

clarifies

this

more

about

the

sorts

of

reporting:

Figure 1: Types of Management Reporting

Why do management practices differ across firms and countries?

There is huge difference in productivity across countries for a substantial fraction of the difference in
average per capita income. Difference in productivity are typically calculated as a residual that is,
productivity is inferred as the gap between output and inputs that cannot be accounted for by
conventionally measured inputs.
Differences in productivity to management practices has long been popular for television shows,
business schools and policymakers, it has been less popular among economists for two broad reasons:
1. Most of management literature is based on case studies rather than on systematic empirical data
across firms and countries.
2. Economists have tended to shy away from management based explanations for productivity
differences is a sense that changing management seems a relatively straightforward process. A
deep study reveals that the combination of imperfectly competitive markets, family ownerships of
firms, regulations restricting management practices and informational barriers allow bad
management to persist.
5|Page

Figure 2: Management scores across countries

How can management practices be measured?

Bloom and Van Reenan (2007) has utilized meeting based instrument that characterizes and scores 1
("most exceedingly awful practices") to 5 ("best practices") upon eighteen fundamental management
practices. In that approach, a high score speaks to a best practice as in a firm that has embraced the
practice will, all things considered, build their profitability. The mix of a large number of these markers
reflects "great management" as it is plainly portrayed from the normal scores of 18 management
practices.

What causes differences in management practices?

Management practices vary substantially across countries and across firms, which raises different
questions. If improved management offers profitability gains, why would firms not adopt better
management practices?
The elements which cause difference in management practices are:
1. Product market competition: when product market competition is not very intense, some low
productivity firms will be able to survive. Syverson (2007b) showed that in a very homogenous
industry in US (ready mix concrete), more competitive geographic markets has a smaller tail of less
productivity plants.
6|Page

2. Labor market regulations: Labor market regulations that constrain the ability of managers to hire,
fire, pay and promote employees could reduce the quality of management practices. Tough labor
market regulations are significantly negatively correlated with the management scores on
incentives. In contrast, more restrictive labor market regulations are not significantly correlated
with the management practices in other dimensions like monitoring and targets.
3. Ownership and meritocratic selection of the Chief Executive Officer: Since family firms typically
have less debt, product market competition may not be as effective in during then out of business if
they are badly managed. Firms owned by private equity appear to be well managed, in particular
when compared to family and government owned firms.
4. Multinationals and Exporters: Foreign multinationals are better managed firms than domestics
ones, presumably reflecting the selection effect that better managed firms are more likely to
become multinationals. Foreign multinationals seems able to partially transport their better
practices abroad despite after difficult local circumstances (Burstein and Monge-Noranjo (2009)).
5. Human Capital: Education is strongly correlated with high management scores, whether one looks
at the education level of managers or of workers.

Measuring Management Practices

To investigate these issues we first have to construct a robust measure of management practices
overcoming three hurdles: scoring management practices, collecting accurate responses, and obtaining
interviews with managers. We discuss these issues in turn.

Scoring Management Practices

To quantify management obliges arranging the idea of "good" and "awful" management into a
measure pertinent to distinctive firms over the assembling area. This is a hard undertaking as great
management is difficult to characterize, and is frequently dependent upon an association's situation.
Our beginning theory was that while some management practices are too unforeseen to be in any way
assessed as "great" to "awful", others can possibly be characterized in these terms, and it is these
practices we attempted to concentrate on in the overview.
To do this we utilized a practice assessment apparatus created by a main universal management
consultancy firm. So as to keep any view of predisposition with our study we decided to get no
budgetary backing from this firm.
The practice assessment device characterizes and scores from one (most exceedingly terrible practice)
to five (best practice) over eighteen key management practices utilized by modern firms. These
7|Page

practices can be gathered into four regions: operations (3 works on), checking (5 practices), focuses on
(5 practices) and motivating forces (5 practices). The operations management area concentrates on the
presentation of incline assembling strategies, the documentation of procedures enhancements and the
basis behind presentations of upgrades. The observing area concentrates on the following elements of
performance of people, checking on performance (e.g. through general evaluations and occupation
arrangements), and outcome management (e.g. verifying that arranges are kept and proper endorses
and prizes are set up). The objectives area analyzes the kind of targets (whether objectives are just
monetary or operational or more comprehensive), the authenticity of the objectives (extending,
improbable or non-tying), the straightforwardness of targets (basic or complex) and the extent and
interconnection of targets (e.g. whether they are given reliably all through the association). At long last,
the motivating forces area incorporates advancement criteria (e.g. simply residency based or including
a component connected to individual performance), pay and rewards, and settling or terminating awful
entertainers, where best practice is regarded the methodology that gives solid prizes for those with
both capacity and exertion. A subset of the practices has likenesses with those utilized as a part of
studies on HRM practices.
Since the scaling may change crosswise over practices in the econometric estimation, we change over
the scores (from the 1 to 5 scale) to z-scores by normalizing by practice to mean zero and standard
deviation one. In our principle econometric details, we take the unweighted normal over all z-scores as
our essential measure of general administrative practice; however we additionally try different things
with different weightings plans taking into account variable investigative methodologies.
There is degree for true blue difference about whether these measures truly constitute "great
practice". In this way, an imperative approach to analyze the externality legitimacy of the measures is
to inspect whether they are related with information on firm performance developed from organization
records and money markets. We additionally look at whether the relationship between management
practices and efficiency is weaker in the Continental European countries to check for any "Somewhat
English Saxon" inclination in our management scores.

Gathering Accurate Responses

With this assessment apparatus we can, on a fundamental level, give some measurement of firms'
management rehearses. In any case, a critical issue is the degree to which we can acquire unprejudiced
reactions to our inquiries from firms. Specifically, will respondents give precise reactions? As is
understood in the studying writing (see, for instance, Bertrand and Mullainathan, 2001) a respondent's
response to study inquiries is normally one-sided by the scoring lattice, secured towards those answers

8|Page

that they expect the questioner believes is "right". Also, questioners might themselves have
assumptions about the performance of the organizations they are talking and predisposition their
scores in view of their ex-risk observations. All the for the most part, a scope of foundation attributes,
conceivably connected with great and awful chiefs, may create a few sorts of efficient inclination in the
study information.

Lack of insight, loss of opportunity

Great management has all the earmarks of being so ardently connected with great performance that it
may be sensible to anticipate that all organizations will improve rehearses a need. The strategies of
good practice are, all things considered, accessible in people in general space in an extensive variety of
effectively available structures. Yet numerous organizations are still ineffectively overseen.
To look at conceivable reasons for this distinction, the most recent round of examination tried to assess
organizations' view they could call their own performance. As the last question in the meeting, subjects
were requested that survey the general management performance of their firm on a size of one to five.
To dodge false humility they were requested that avoid their own performance from the count.
Subjects' responses to this inquiry were not very much connected with either our management practice
score, or their own business performance. This circumstance connected in all districts, and improved or
all the more inadequately oversaw firms.
We discovered this absence of mindfulness striking. It proposes to us that the greater part of firms are
making no endeavor to contrast their own management conduct and acknowledged practices or even
with that of different firms in their segment. As a result, numerous associations are most likely passing
up a great opportunity for an opportunity for noteworthy change in light of the fact that they
essentially don't perceive that their own management practices are so poor.

Government action could help

A mixed bag of strategy components has an impact on organizations' adoption of good management
practices. Most critical among these were their focused surroundings and the adaptability of the nearby
work market.
Organizations in the overview were solicited to appraise the number from contenders working in their
business sector. The more contenders and organization reported, the higher its management practice
scores. This could be as a consequence of two impacts:

9|Page

1) Great practice spreads rapidly in very focused situations, and

2) Poor practice is wiped out by normal choice as poorer performing organizations are expelled from
the commercial center.
Adaptable work markets ought to urge organizations to embrace better individuals management
practices so as to draw in and hold the best representatives. The bigger number of nations included in
the most recent examination, with broadly diverse work market environments, permitted this
speculation to be investigated inside and out.
The connection turned out to be an in number one. Organizations working in nations with more
adaptable work polices (measured utilizing the World Bank's measure of occupation law unbending
nature record) scored notably better in individuals management rehearses. The US, with its amazingly
adaptable occupation laws, had by a long shot the best individuals management record, a component
which contributed firmly to its general top position among reviewed organizations.
The accessibility of talented individuals, both in management and among the workforce when all is said
in done, is another essential distinction between better oversaw firms and the rest. 84 percent of
administrators in the most astounding scoring firms were taught to degree level or higher, similar to a
quarter of the non-management work power. Among the most minimal scoring firms, by difference,
just 53 percent of chiefs and just 5 percent of the more extensive workforce had degrees.

Conclusion
Based on the studies conducted by Nicholas Bloom and John Van Reenen published in The Journal of
Economic Perspectives Vol. 24, No. 1 (Winter 2010), pp. 203-224, ten conclusions had been discussed
based on management data.
1. Firms with better management practices tend to have better performance on a wide range of
dimensions: they are larger, more productive, grow faster, and have higher survival rates.
2. Management practices vary tremendously across firms and countries. Most of the differences are
the average management score of a country is due to the size of the long tail of very badly
managed firms.
3. Countries and firms specialize in different styles of management.
4. Strong product market competition appears to boost average management practices through a
combination of eliminating the tail of badly managed firms and pushing incumbents to improve
their practices.
5. Multinationals are generally well managed. They also transplant their management styles abroad.

10 | P a g e

6. Firms that exports (but do no manufacture) overseas are better managed than domestic non
exporters, but are worse managed than multinationals.
7. Inherited family owned firms who appoint a family member as Chief Executive Officer are very
badly managed on average.
8. Government owned firms are typically managed extremely badly.
9. Firms that more intensively use human capital, as measured by more educated workers, tend to
have much better management practices.
10. At the country level, a relatively light touch in labor market regulation is associated with better use
of incentives by management.

For companies
Multinational organizations have been compelled to take an efficient way to deal with management.
Just by having solid, compelling management rehearses set up have they possessed the capacity to
reproduce the same norms of performance crosswise over diverse districts, societies and markets.
Today, they are procuring the advantages of this exertion as far as higher efficiency, better profits for
capital and more powerful development.
The same advantages are effortlessly open to different associations, wherever they work. Yet
shockingly few organizations have made any endeavor to pick up knowledge into the nature of their
management practices. Those that do as such give themselves the chance to get to quick, savvy and
practical game changer.

For policymakers
Governments can play their part in encouraging the take-up of good management behaviour. Doing so
may be the single most cost-effective way of improving the performance of their economies. Strong
competition and flexible labor markets both lead directly to improved management performance.
Multinational companies have a strong positive effect too, and their influence is felt throughout the
regions in which they operate.
Relentless improvement in educational standards is also essential. Better-managed firms need more
highly skilled workers and they make better use of them, while better educated managers will be a key
component of the performance transformation that both established and emerging economies must
undertake if they are to maintain and improve their global competitive position.

11 | P a g e

Plagiarism Check Report:

For plagiarism check I have referred 3 online portals
1. http://smallseotools.com/plagiarism-checker/

2. https://www.thepensters.com/free-plagiarism-checkerreport.html?id=4e15360419bd681add5a88ddd1fe4fce_1440180432:6663710

12 | P a g e

3. https://academichelp.net/plagiarismreport/?id=625d43e58fad25e816a39ab1fc5f0d4a_1440180495:6663719

13 | P a g e