Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
LECTURE NOTES
DILUTIVE SECURITIES AND EARNINGS PER SHARE
Table of Contents
Page
2
3
5
7
10
14
16
17
18
19
21
22
23
24
27
29
30
32
Convertible bonds
Ace Company issued $100,000 face value convertible bonds on October 1, 2009. The stated interest rate
was 5%, and the bonds were sold to yield 6%. Each $1,000 bond is convertible into 40 shares of Ace's
$1 par value common on or after October 1, 2012. The bonds pay interest on April 1 and October 1, and
mature on October 1, 2014. How should the convertible bonds be recorded on October 1, 2009?
Market price of the convertible bonds
Market price of the common stock
Convertible bonds tend to sell at a price higher than the market price of the common. For example, assume a
convertible bond was convertible into 50 shares of common and that the market value of the common was $25
per share. The market value of the common is $1,250 per bond (50 shares X $25). The market value of a
convertible bond would likely be higher than $1,250 because investors are willing to pay extra for the option
to convert.
10/1/14
I-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I
$100,000
$2,500 of interest is paid on April and October 1 each year for 5 years
The issue price of a bond is the present value of the maturity amount ($100,000) added to the present
value of the interest annuity ($2,500), both amounts being discounted at the yield rate. $2,500 =
$100,000 X the stated interest rate of 5% for year.
PV using 6% = $2,500(8.53020)* + $100,000(.74409)*
= $95,735
*8.53020 is the present value factor for a 10 rent ordinary annuity at 3%, while .74409 is the present
value of $1 for 10 periods at 3%. Since interest is paid every 6 months, the yield rate of 6% per year
becomes 3% for each year.
2
Accounting question: Should the proceeds from convertible bonds be viewed as all debt or as part debt
and part stockholders equity? The option to convert is imbedded in the convertible bond. When
investors buy convertible bonds, they place a value on the imbedded option. The accounting issue is
how to reliably measure the value of the imbedded option. It is the opinion of the profession that
estimating the value for the imbedded option is too subjective. Therefore, this value is not separated
from the proceeds received from issuing convertible debt.
Value of debt $95,735; Face value of debt $100,000; Discount
on bonds = $100,000 face value minus $95,735 = $4,265
$95,735
Value of imbedded option = $0
The proceeds from the issuance of convertible bonds are accounted for as all debt. The entry below
records the issuance of the convertible bonds on October 1, 2009.
CASH
95,735
DISCOUNT ON BONDS
4,265
BONDS PAYABLE
100,000
Rationale: The Accounting Principles Board (APB) decided that, because the debt and the conversion
feature were inseparable, all the proceeds from convertible debt should be accounted for as debt at the
date of issuance.
Bondholders
or
Stockholders
convert bonds
Company
common stock
Investors are either bondholders or stockholders, not both. This is the inseparability argument.
Therefore, proceeds received from issuing convertible debt are accounted for as 100% debt.
Common stock
(investors are
stockholders if they
convert the bonds into
common stock)
Convertible bonds
(investors are debtors if
they hold the bonds)
$50,000
(929)
$49,071
======
There are two methods of accounting for the conversion of convertible bondsthe book value and the
market value methods. The book value method is used more frequently in practice.
Under the book value method, there is no gain or loss reported when convertible bonds are
converted into common stock because the conversion of bonds is not viewed as the
completion of an earnings process. The conversion is an exchange transaction, but the
assumption is that the holders of convertible bonds always intended to be stockholders.
Therefore, being bondholders was a temporary state.
Under the market value method, there is a gain or a loss reported when convertible bonds
are converted because the conversion of bonds is viewed as the completion of an earnings
process. Again, the conversion is an exchange transaction, and the assumption is that the
holders of convertible bonds had to make a separate decision as to whether they wanted to
be bondholders or stockholders. This separate decision represents the completion of an
earnings process if the decision is to convert the bonds into common stock.
50,000
DISCOUNT ON BONDS
929
2,000
47,071
Under the book value method, the carrying amount of the bonds converted ($49,071) is transferred to
common stock and additional paid in capital. Since common stock is increased for the par value of the shares
issued ($2,000) in the conversion, additional paid in capital is plugged for the difference between the carrying
amount of the bonds converted ($49,071) and the par value of the common stock ($2,000) issued in the
conversion.
Do exercise 16-4 at this time.
Market value method:
Assume the market value of the common stock was $26 per share on the conversion date of October 1, 2012:
BONDS PAYABLE
$52,000
( 49,071)
$ 2,929
======
50,000
2,929
DISCOUNT ON BONDS
929
2,000
50,000
The loss from bond conversion is reported in the other income and loss section of the income statement.
Since investors usually convert convertible bonds when the market value of the common stock is increasing,
most bond conversions will result in losses being reported if the market value method is used. Because the
book value method does not report gains or losses from bond conversion, selecting the book value method
will increase net income. This is the reason why the book value method is the method of choice.
Common Stock Rights
Rights issued in connection with the preemptive rights of stockholders:
When corporations need cash, one way to raise the cash is to issue more common stock... When unissued
common stock is issued, existing common stockholders usually must be given the right to acquire the
new shares in the same proportion that they own the issued shares. For example, assume a corporation
decided to issue an additional 1,000,000 shares of unissued common stock. Stockholder A, who currently
owns 2% of the issued common shares, must be given rights to acquire 20,000 shares (1,000,000 shares
X 2%) of the new offering. The right to maintain ones ownership percentage is referred to as the
Preemptive rights are issued by the corporation for no consideration, and the rights expire after a
designated period. The rights permit the holders to acquire unissued common stock at a specified price
per share, referred to as the strike price or the exercise price.
Holders of the rights may exercise them and acquire common stock, or they may choose to sell the rights
to other investors. If the market value of the common stock falls below the exercise price and remains
below the exercise price, the rights will lapse because investors will not act irrationally and acquire
common stock at a price above market value.
In accounting for preemptive stock rights, no entries are made by the corporation when rights are
issued. When rights are issued, the corporation does not record any journal entries because the rights
were issued for no consideration.
When rights are exercised, the corporation records the issuance of common stock and the receipt of cash
equal to the shares issued times the exercise price per share. Until the rights are exercised, disclosure of
the rights is made in the notes to the financial statements.
Example: CRT Company issued rights to acquire 1,000,000 shares of its unissued common stock at a price of $25
per share on February 15, 2011. The rights expire on May 15, 2011. The market value of CRTs $5 par value
common stock was $26 per share on the date the rights were issued. On April 10, 2011, 600,000 rights were
exercised when the market price of CRTs common was $29 per share.
February 15, 2011 journal entry:
No entry is made on the date the rights are issued. There is nothing to record on the issuance date because the
rights were issued for no consideration.
April 10, 2011 journal entry:
CASH (600,000 shares X $25 exercise price)
15,000,000
3,000,000
12,000,000
CASH
25
COMMON STOCK
ADDITIONAL PAID IN CAPITAL
10
15
Issued
No
Exercised
Yes
B.
C.
D.
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
Answer: A
Answer: A
$0
$ 5,000
$ 8,000
$10,000
Debt
Proceeds
from debt
and warrants
$240,000
$199,322
=======
240,000
678
BONDS PAYABLE
200,000
40,678
Warrants =
Proceeds
from debt
and warrants
$240,000
$40,678
=======
Do exercises 16-8 and 16-9 at this time.
Incremental method of allocating the amount received from the issuance of bonds with detachable warrants:
Materiality considerations permit using the incremental method instead of the proportional method when
allocating the proceeds from the issuance of bonds with detachable warrants. The incremental method does
not use a formula. It takes one of the market values, for example, the market value of the bonds, and uses it
as the amount that is allocated to debt. The amount allocated to debt is then subtracted from the total amount
to plug in the value for the warrants. In the Fay Company example, the incremental method would produce
the following results if the market value of the bonds was selected as the primary value:
$196,000 from bonds (this is the market value of the bonds
without the warrants) $200,000 face value $196,000 = $4,000 bond
discount.
$240,000 cash received
$ 44,000 from warrants(this amount is plugged: $240,000 less
$196,000 = $44,000)
Journal entry to record the issuance of bonds with detachable warrants:
CASH
240,000
4,000
BONDS PAYABLE
200,000
44,000
The proportional method should be used when the fair values of the bonds and the warrants are known.
Do exercise 16-8 and CA 16-1 (part an only) at this time.
Stock options are difficult to measure (determine a dollar value for) because
they are not transferable(if the recipients of stock options leave the company, their stock options are
terminated);
no cash exchange value is ever established for the option because the options cannot be sold.
Note: stock options are used by corporations to keep valuable employees; however, their importance in new and
emerging companies is critical because these companies usually do not have the cash flow to pay high salaries.
Therefore, valuable employees are granted options to acquire the companys common stock at a fixed price per
share. The hope is that the company will become very successful, and that its earnings and common stock price
will both increase, thus making the stock options valuable.
10
Employer
Grant date
Options expire
Vesting period
FASB standards require stock options to be valued at their fair value on the date of grant for public
companies (companies whose stock is traded on national or regional exchanges). The fair value of the
stock options would be determined using an options pricing model-examples, the Black-Scholes
Option Pricing Model or a binominal model.
2.
The following factors are used in determining the estimated fair value of stock options at the
grant dateyou should know that these factors are used to determine an estimate of an options fair
value, but you should not be concerned about using them to calculate a fair value.
Risk-free interest rate for the expected term of the options; and
Exercise date
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Market value on grant date:
Present value of exercise price
Present value of expected dividends
Estimated value of single option
$30
(22)the exercise price is set equal to the market price on the grant
( 3) date to give employees favorable income tax treatment.
$5
11
10,000
$50,000
4 years
$12,500
Present value the exercise price and expected dividends using the risk free interest rate and subtract both
amounts from the market value of the common stock on the grant date. The difference is the estimated fair
value of an option, before adjusting for expected volatility.
Questions on stock options
On January 1, 2010, Taft Inc. granted stock options that
vest and become exercisable on January 1, 2012, after
employees have worked for two years. Employees may
exercise their options during the period January 1, 2012
through December 31, 2015. Over what time period
should Taft recognize compensation expense for the stock
options granted in 2010?
A.
B.
C.
D.
In 2010 only.
In 2010 and 2011.
During the period 2010 through 2015.
During the period 2012 through 2015.
Answer: B
On January 2, 2010, Crandle Company, a public company,
granted options to its key executives to purchase 50,000 shares
of its $5 par value common stock at $30 per share. The options
vest and are exercisable beginning on January 1, 2012, after
employees have completed two years of service. The market
value of Crandles common stock was $30 per share on January
2, 2010 and $34 per share on December 31, 2010. The options
are exercisable over the period January 1, 2012 through
December 31, 2014. All the options were exercised in 2013.
Assume the fair value of a single option was $8 on
January 2, 2010.
Number of options
Fair value of an option
Fair value of options on
1/02/10
Service period
50,000
$
$400,000
2 years
.
Answer: C
Journal entry (the entry is an adjusting entry) made at the end of both years (2010 and 2011):
12
$200,000
Compensation Expense
Additional Paid in CapitalStock Options
200,000
200,000
1,500,000
400,000
250,000
1,650,000
EMPLOYEES
EMPLOYER
(1) WORK FOR A SPECIFIED PERIOD (VESTING PERIOD) AND
(2) PAY A SPECIFIED PRICE PER SHARE(EXERCISE / STRIKE PRICE)
(3) COMMON STOCK (PAR VALUE) IS ISSUED TO EMPLOYEES
(4) ADDITIONAL PAID IN CAPITAL FOR THE EXCESS OVER PAR VALUE
Note that reporting compensation expense on 12/31/10 and 11 had no effect on total stockholders
equity because total compensation expense of $400,000 is closed to retained earnings and offsets
the increase of $400,000 to additional paid in capitalstock options of $400,000. As a result of the exercise
of the stock options, total stockholders equity increased $1,500,000 (the amount of cash received) and
additional paid in capital increased a net of $1,650,000 ($400,000 from the 12/31/10 and 11 entries and
$1,250,000 from the exercise ($1,650,000 minus $400,000).
Assets
Liabilities
Cash +$1,500,000
Stockholders equity
13
100,000
100,000
If an employee fails to satisfy the service or vesting requirement because s/he leaves the company, the
cumulative compensation expense recognized to date has to be reversed in the current year (assume that
$50,000 of expense was reported in each of the past 2 years for the employees who left the company):
Additional Paid in Capital-Stock Options
Compensation Expense
100,000
100,000
Additional paid in capital-stock options can be debited in three situations : (1) exercise of stock options, (2)
expiration of stock options, and (3) forfeiture of stock options.
Do exercises 16-10 and 16-12 and problems 16-1 and 16-3 at this time.
Other forms of transactions involving common stock issuances to employees
Stock bonus or award plans
Common shares are issued to executives based upon the accomplishment of some performance criterion, for
example, the growth in the companys earnings from the previous year. Bonus or award plans are not tied to
the market value of the common stock like stock options are. This means that an executive may receive a
stock bonus or award in a particular year even though the companys common stock price may be depressed.
A depressed common stock price makes the exercise of stock options less appealing. Assume an executive
was awarded 5,000 shares of common stock due to a 20% increase in the company's earnings this year. If the
market value of the common stock is $25 per share, then $125,000 of compensation expense would be
recognized. Note that bonus and award plans are 100% compensatory. Assume the par value of the common
stock was $5 per share. The entry to record compensation expense is shown below.
Entry to recognize common stock award:
COMPENSATION EXPENSE (5,000 shares X $25)
125,000
25,000
100,000
The financial statement effects of the entry are shown belownote that there are no effects on assets and
liabilities.
Assets
Liabilities
Stockholders equity
-Compensation expense -$125,000
(retained earnings)
+Common stock
+$25,000
+Additional paid in
capital-excess over par +$100,000
14
Employees are granted common stock but they cannot dispose of the stock until they complete the vesting period.
If employees do not complete the vesting period, the shares must be given back to the corporation. Assume that a
corporation granted Mary Hines 1,000 shares of restricted common stock on January 1, 2009. The par value of the
common is $2 per share, and the fair value of each share on the grant date was $15. The vesting period is 4 years.
Mary worked for the corporation in 2009 and 2010, but she left the company in 2011.
15,000
COMMON STOCK
2,000
13,000
*Unearned compensation is reported as a contra item in stockholders equity, similar to treasury stock.
The financial statement effects of the entry are shown belownote that there are no effects on assets and
liabilities.
Assets
Liabilities
Stockholders equity
-Unearned Compensation -$15,000
(retained earnings)
+Common stock
+$2,000
+Additional paid in
capital-excess over par +$13,000
12/31/09:
COMPENSATION EXPENSE
3,750
UNEARNED COMPENSATION
3,750
Liabilities
Stockholders equity
-Compensation expense -$3,750
(retained earnings)
+Unearned compensation+$3,750
12/31/10
COMPENSATION EXPENSE
3,750
15
UNEARNED COMPENSATION
3,750
Journal entry made after Mary leaves the company in 2011, assuming no expense was recognized in 2011:
COMMON STOCK
2,000
13,000
COMPENSATION EXPENSE
7,500
UNEARNED COMPENSATION
7,500
Liabilities
Stockholders equity
+Compensation expense +$7,500
(retained earnings)
+Unearned compensation +$7,500
-Common stock
-$2,000
-Additional paid in
capital-excess over par -$13,000
190,000
50,000
140,000
16
Liabilities
+Cash $190,000
(10,000 shares X $19)
Stockholders equity
+Common stock $50,000
+Additional paid
in capital-excess
over par
$140,000
Cola, Boeing, Winn-Dixie, and ABM Property Corp. decided to voluntarily recognize
expense from their stock options.
The FASB then passed a standard in 2004 that required all companies to expense their stock
options using an options pricing model such as the Black-Scholes or the binomial models.
There is harmonization between U.S. GAAP and IFRS on the accounting for stock options.
Convertible bonds;
Convertible preferred stock; and
Stock rights, options, and warrants
If potentially dilutive securities are converted or exercised, basic earnings per share may be decreased. The
decrease in basic earnings per share is referred to as dilution.
A simple capital structure contains common stock and no other securities that could dilute basic earnings per share.
Basic earnings per share in a simple capital structure
Net income less preferred dividends*
Basic earnings per share
=
Weighted average of common shares outstanding
18
* Current year preferred dividends are deducted whether declared or not if the preferred stock is cumulative. If the
preferred stock is not cumulative, current year dividends are deducted only if they have been declared.
Garth Inc. reported net income of $250,000 during 2010. The company declared preferred dividends of
$20,000 during 2010. The company started and completed the year with 100,000 shares of common stock
outstanding. Garth did not issue or reacquire any of its common stock during 2010.
$250,000 less $20,000
Basic earnings per share
=
100,000 common shares outstanding
=
Calculate Garths weighted average number of common shares outstanding for 2010.
Shares outstanding
Weighted average
3/12
25,000
3/12
31,250
6/12
57,500
113,750
======
Weighted average
100,000 shares
12/12
100,000
25,000 shares
9/12
18,750
(10,000) shares
6/12
( 5,000)
113,750
======
Garths basic earnings per share for 2010 would be calculated as follows:
19
Stock dividends and stock splits and the effect on the weighted average of common shares outstanding
Assume Garth Inc. started 2010 with 100,000 common shares and had the following stock transactions
during 2010:
o
o
o
Weighted average
3/12
3/12
6/12
50,000
62,500
115,000
227,500
======
Note that a stock split (or a stock dividend) is an adjustment to the shares that were outstanding during 2010.
For EPS purposes, stock splits and stock dividends require restatements of common shares that were
outstanding prior to the split or stock dividend.
Unlike an issuance of shares for cash or the reacquisition of treasury shares for cash, a stock split or a stock
dividend is not weighted from the date of the split or stock dividend.
The same weighted average would have resulted if Garth had declared and issued a 100% stock dividend on
October 1, 2010.
Garths basic earnings per share for 2010 is shown below:
$250,000 less $20,000
Basic earnings per share=
227,500 common shares
=
20
Garth must also restate prior years earnings per share as a result of its 2 for 1 split in 2010. Assume Garth
originally reported the following amounts for basic earnings per share in 2008 and 2009:
o
2009
$1.90
Basic EPS
2008
$1.50
In 2010, Garth must restate basic EPS for both 2009 and 2008 so that the amounts are consistent with basic
EPS for 2010(note that restatement of EPS is also required for stock dividends):
2010
2009
2008
o
Basic EPS
$1.01
$ .95
$ .75
Required to be reported on the face of the income statement for all companies whose
securities are traded on stock exchanges.
Net income(loss).
Optional EPS disclosureseither on the face of the income statement or in the notes:
o
Extraordinary gain/loss
21
Basic and diluted earnings per share for a complex capital structure
If a corporation has a complex capital structure, a dual presentation of earnings per share may be necessary. A
complex capital structure is one that contains potentially dilutive securities. Potentially dilutive securities are
securities that, if converted or if exercised, may result in a reduction in basic earnings per share. If there is a
reduction in basic earnings per share, then diluted earnings per share must be disclosed along with basic earnings
per share.
Case I:
ABC Company provided you with the following information for 2010:
1.
2.
3.
4.
Net income
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding during 2010
Preferred dividends declared
Additional information: The preferred stock is convertible into 20,000 shares
of common stock. The convertible preferred was outstanding during all of
2010. The convertible preferred stock is a potentially dilutive security.
$100,000
100,000
10,000
Description
Numerator
Net income
$100,000
Preferred dividends
( 10,000)
Weighted average
shares of common
Totals
-----------$ 90,000
========
Denominator
Basic EPS
100,000
------------100,000
=======
$ .90 share
========
$ 90,000
100,000
If converted method
22
applied to convertible
preferred stock:
Dividends avoided
Common shares
assumed issued
+ 10,000
----------$100,000
=======
Totals
+ 20,000
-----------120,000
========
$ .83 share
=========
Case I conclusion:
The convertible preferred stock is actually dilutive. Basic earnings per share was decreased from $.90 a share
to $.83 a share. Both basic and diluted earnings per share amounts would be reported on the face of the
income statement, assuming ABCs securities are publicly traded.
Earnings per share on net income for 2010:
Basic earnings per common share on net income
$ .90
$ .83
Assume, in case I, that net income was $50,000 instead of $100,000. Compute basic and diluted
earnings per share for 2010.
Basic earnings per share
Description
Numerator
Net income
$ 50,000
Preferred dividends
( 10,000)
Weighted average
shares of common
Totals
-----------$ 40,000
========
Denominator
Basic EPS
100,000
------------100,000
=======
$ .40 share
========
$ 40,000
100,000
If converted method
applied to convertible
preferred stock:
23
Dividends avoided
Common shares
assumed issued
Totals
+ 10,000
----------$ 50,000
=======
+ 20,000
-----------120,000
========
$ .42 share
=========
In the revised case I, diluted earnings per share is higher than basic earnings per share. This means
that the convertible preferred is antidilutive. Only basic earnings per share of $.40 should be reported on
the face of the income statement for 2010.
Case II:
ABC Company provided you with the following information for 2010:
1.
2.
3.
4.
Net income
$100,000
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding during 2010
100,000
Preferred dividends declared
10,000
Additional information: The preferred is not convertible. However, ABC had convertible
bonds outstanding during all of 2010. The bonds were convertible into 20,000 shares of
common. Interest expense on the bonds for 2010 was $10,000, and the income tax rate
for 2010 was 40%. The convertible bonds are a potentially dilutive security.
Description
Numerator
Net income
$100,000
Preferred dividends
( 10,000)
Denominator
-----------$ 90,000
========
100,000
----------100,000 =
========
Basic EPS
$ .90 share
========
$ 90,000
100,000
+6,000
+ 20,000
24
-----------$ 96,000
=======
Totals
Case II conclusion:
The convertible bonds are actually dilutive. Basic earnings per share decreased from $ .90 a share to
$ .80 a share. As in Case I, both basic and diluted earnings per share would be reported on the face of the
income statement, assuming ABCs securities are publicly traded. Note that the interest avoided computation
is net of tax, whereas the dividends avoided computation for convertible preferred is not net of income tax
because preferred dividends are not an expense.
Case III:
ABC Company provided you with the following information for 2010:
1.
2.
3.
4.
Net income
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding during 2010
Preferred dividends declared
Additional information: The preferred stock is convertible into 20,000 shares
of common stock. The convertible preferred was outstanding during all of
2010. ABC had convertible also had bonds outstanding during all of 2010.
The bonds were convertible into 20,000 shares of common. Interest expense
on the bonds for 2010 was $10,000, and the income tax rate
for 2010 was 40%.
Description
Numerator
Net income
$100,000
Preferred dividends
( 10,000)
Denominator
$100,000
100,000
10,000
-----------$ 90,000
========
100,000
----------100,000 =
========
Basic EPS
$ .90 share
========
$ 90,000
100,000
+6,000
+ 20,000
25
$.80 share
If converted method
applied to convertible
preferred stock:
Dividends avoided
Common shares
assumed issued
+ 10,000
-----------$106,000
=======
Totals
+ 20,000
----------140,000 = $ .76 share
========
=========
Sequential loading of potentially dilutive securities into diluted earnings per share
Rank each potentially dilutive security based on its incremental numerator and denominator effects:
Convertible bonds:
Incremental numerator:
Incremental denominator
$10,000 of dividends
------------------------------------------20,000 common shares
Description
Numerator
Net income
$100,000
Preferred dividends
( 10,000)
Denominator
-----------$ 90,000
=======
100,000
--------------100,000
=
=========
Basic EPS
$ .90 share
=========
Diluted EPS
$ 90,000
27
100,000
0
----------$ 90,000
=======
Totals
8,000
/
-----------108,000
========
$ .83 share
=========
Case IV conclusion:
The stock options are dilutive. Basic earnings per share was reduced from $.90 a share to $.83 a share. ABC is
required to report both basic and diluted earnings per share on the face of its income statement, assuming that
ABCs securities are publicly traded.
Comments about the Treasury Stock Method:
The treasury stock method is based upon the following assumptions, using the information from Case III:
a. Assume all options are exercised
as of the first day of the year:
Employees
Corporation
28
Vesting period
Exercisable period
29
Time
Options expire
IFRS and U.S. GAAP are substantially the same in the accounting for stock options and earnings per
share. The minor differences that exist are being worked on, and these should be resolved in the next
year or so.
More substantial differences exist in the accounting for convertible debt and employee stock purchase
plans.
IFRS requires that the proceeds received from the issuance of convertible bonds be allocated into debt
and equity amounts. The process of allocation is referred to as bifurcation. Example: assume a
company issued convertible bonds with a face value of $500,000 for $492,000. IFRS requires that the
present value of the bonds be determined using the market rate of interest. Assume that, using the
market rate of interest, the present value of the bonds is determined to be $471,000. The allocation
below shows how the proceeds of $492,000 are allocated to debt and to equity:
492,000
29,000
500,000
21,000
Conversions of convertible bonds are accounted for using the book value method. Assuming all
convertible bonds were converted when the carrying amount of the bonds was $480,000, the entry
below would be made:
Bonds Payable
Share PremiumConversion Equity
Discount on Bonds ($500,000 minus 480,000)
30
500,000
21,000
20,000
50,000
451,000
Employee stock purchase plans are always compensatory. Under U.S. GAAP, these plans were not
compensatory if the discount from the market price of the ordinary shares was no more than 5%.
Assume a companys employees acquired 10,000 ordinary shares at a 5% discount from the market
price of $20 per share, and that the par value of the ordinary shares was $5 per share. The journal
entry to record the employee stock purchase is shown below:
The entry to recognize common stock acquired by employees is:
CASH (10,000 shares X $19)
190,000
10,000
50,000
150,000
Liabilities
+Cash $190,000
(10,000 shares X $19)
Stockholders equity
Share capital-ordinary +$ 50,000
Share premium-ordinary +$150,000
Retained
Earnings
--$ 10,000
(Expense)
31
$977,000
920,000
7,000
50,000
15,000
$ 35,000
Ute Co. had the following capital structure during 2009 and 2010:
Preferred stock, $10 par, 4% cumulative, 25,000 shares issued
and outstanding
Common stock, $5 par, 200,000 shares issued and outstanding
$ 250,000
1,000,000
Ute reported net income of $500,000 for the year ended December 31, 2010. Ute paid no preferred
dividends during 2009 and paid $20,000 in preferred dividends during 2010. In its December 31,
2010 income statement, what amount should Ute report as basic earnings per share?
3. Strauch Co. has one class of common stock outstanding and no other securities that are potentially
convertible into common stock. During 2009, 100,000 shares of common stock were outstanding. In
2010, two distributions of additional common shares occurred: On April 1, 20,000 shares of treasury
stock were sold, and on July 1, a 2-for-1 stock split was issued. Net income was $410,000 in 2010 and
$350,000 in 2009. What amounts should Strauch report as basic earnings per share for 2010 and 2009
in its annual report for 2010?
4. On January 1, 2010, Watson Co. had 1,000,000 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.
During 2010, the following transactions occurred that involved the companys common stock:
32
At December 31, 2010, how many shares of common stock are outstanding?
For basic earnings per share computations for 2010, what is the weighted average of common
stock outstanding?
Peters Corp.s capital structure is as follows:
December31
2009
2010
Outstanding shares of stock:
Common
110,000
110,000
Convertible preferred
10,000
10,000
5.
During 2010, Peters paid dividends of $3 per share on its preferred stock and $1 per
share on its common stock. The preferred shares are convertible into 20,000 shares of
common stock. Net income for 2010 was $184,000. Assume the income tax rate is 30%.
Answer the following questions(round up to the nearest cent, i.e. $1.845 = $1.85)
A. What is basic earnings per share for 2010?
B. What is diluted earnings per share for 2010?
C. What earnings per share amount(s) is (are) reported on the 2010 income statement?
6.
Mann, Inc. had 300,000 shares of common stock issued and outstanding at December 31,
2009. On July 1, 2010, an additional 50,000 shares of common stock were issued for
cash. Mann also had stock options to purchase 40,000 shares of common stock at $15 per
share outstanding at the beginning and end of 2010. The average market price of Manns
common stock was $20 during 2010, while the market price on December 31, 2010 was
$24. What is the number of common shares that should be used in computing diluted
earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2010?
7.
Carlton Inc. issued $1,000,000 face value of bonds on April 1, 2010, for $1,150,000. Each $1,000
bond contained 5 detachable stock purchase warrants that enabled the holder to acquire 5 shares of
Carltons common stock for $50 per share. Immediately after the bonds were issued, the market value
of the bonds selling independently from the warrants was $1,080,000, and the market value of each
warrant selling independently of the bonds was $9. What portion of the $1,150,000 should be credited
to premium on bonds?
8.
Carlton Inc. issued $1,000,000 face value of bonds on April 1, 2010, for $1,150,000. Each $1,000
bond contained 5 detachable stock purchase warrants that enabled the holder to acquire 5 shares of
Carltons common stock for $50 per share. Immediately after the bonds were issued, the market value
of the bonds selling independently from the warrants was $1,100,000. Assuming use of the
incremental method, what portion of the $1,150,000 should be credited to additional paid in capital?
9.
Martz Company has an employee stock purchase plan that allows employees who meet certain
eligibility requirements to acquire the companys common stock at a discount of 5% from its market
33
value. For the month ended December 31, 2010, employees acquired 10,000 shares of the companys
$10 par value common stock under this plan. The average market value of the common during
December was $30 per share. Make the journal entry to record the employee stock purchase.
10. On July 1, 2010, Naples Inc. issued 100,000 rights to its common stockholders for no consideration.
The rights entitled the stockholders to acquire 100,000 shares of Naples unissued $10 par value
common stock for $50 per share. On the date the rights were issued, the market price of the common
stock was $48 per share. On September 1, 2010, 30,000 rights were exercised when the market value
of the common stock was $56 per share. On the date the rights were exercised, what amount should
be credited to additional paid in capital in excess of par value?
11. Which of the following statements is correct?
A.
B.
C.
D.
The objective of issuing rights to existing stockholders to acquire unissued common stock is
to raise equity capital.
For financial reporting purposes, employee stock purchase plans are noncompensatory
(compensation expense is not recognized) when the discount from the market value of the
common stock is equal to or less than 5%.
A and B.
Neither A nor B.
12. The inseparability argument applies to which of the following debt issues?
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
Convertible bonds.
Debt issued with detachable warrants.
Preferred stock that is subject to mandatory redemption.
A and B.
A, B, and C.
Stock options are described as being underwater when the market price of the common
stock is below the strike or exercise price.
Compensation expense for stock options should be recognized during the vesting period.
A and B.
Neither A nor B.
34
B.
C.
D.
The rationale for not reporting gains and losses on bond conversions is that an exchange
transaction has not taken place.
A and B.
Neither A nor B.
The cost principle justifies the use of the incremental method to account for debt issued with
detachable warrants.
When a corporation has a complex capital structure, it must report two earnings per share
amounts on the face of its income statement.
A and B.
Neither A nor B.
17. What is the effect on total stockholders equity from each of the events below?
Stock options
are exercised
A.
B.
C.
D.
Increase
No effect
Increase
Increase
Restricted stock
is awarded
Increase
No effect
Decrease
No effect
Disregarded.
Added back to net income whether declared or not.
Deducted from net income only if declared.
Deducted from net income whether declared or not.
35
Butler Company issued $100,000 of convertible bonds for $95,600 on September 1, 2007. Each $1,000 bond
is convertible into 30 shares of Butlers $5 par value common stock beginning on September 1, 2010. On
September 1, 2010, holders of 50 bonds converted their bonds into the companys common stock. The market
value of the common stock on the day of conversion was $40 per share, and the unamortized discount related
to all of the bonds on the same date was $2,300.
19. On September 1, 2010, make the journal entry to record the conversion, assuming the book value
method is used to record the bond conversion?
20. Assuming the market value method is used to record the bond conversion on September 1, 2010, what
is the amount of loss from bond conversion.
Use the information below to answer questions 21-24.
April Hudson and Jack Jenson are executives who work for Larson Industries. On January 2, 2010, Larson
granted each executive 3,000 shares of the companys $3 par value common stock. On the grant date, the fair
value of Larsons common stock was $35 per share. According to the agreement between the company and
the executives, Ms. Hudson and Mr. Jensen have to work for Larson through 2012 before the common stock
can be sold. Both April Hudson and Jack Jensen worked for Larson during 2010 and 2011. However, a family
matter forced Jack Jensen to resign, effective at the beginning of 2012. April Hudson continued working for
Larson throughout 2012.
21.
22.
23.
24.
On January 2, 2010, what amount is credited to additional paid in capital--excess over par?
Make the journal entry to record compensation expense for 2010?
Make the journal entry to record the return of common stock by Jack Jensen in 2012.
What is compensation expense for 2012 related to April Hudson?
36
31. Refer to the previous question. Assume all of the convertible bonds were converted when the carrying
value of the bonds was $486,000 and that the par value of the ordinary shares issued upon conversion
was $60,000. Make the journal entry to record the conversion using IFRS.
32. Martz Company has an employee stock purchase plan that allows employees who meet certain
eligibility requirements to acquire the companys ordinary shares at a discount of 5% from its market
value. For the month ended December 31, 2010, employees acquired 10,000 shares of the companys
$10 par value ordinary shares under this plan. The average market value of the common during
December was $30 per share. Make the journal entry to record the employee stock purchase using
IFRS.
33. Clout Corp. reported net income of $500,000 for 2011. The company had 300,000 weighted average
shares of common stock outstanding during 2011. The company also had the following two
potentially dilutive securities outstanding during 2011: (1) 20,000 shares of convertible preferred
stock upon which a dividend of $50,000 was declared during 2011; the preferred is convertible into
30,000 shares of common and (2) $400,000 face value of convertible bonds that are convertible into
20,000 common shares; interest expense related to the bonds was $25,000 for 2011; the income tax
rate is 35%. For 2011, what was Clouts diluted earnings per share? Round as follows: $1.527 =
$1.53.
37
Accountancy 432/532
Quiz 2 Take Home Answers
Spring 2015
Name:
Aoran Kan
Seat #:
26
1.
2.
3.
2010:
2009:
4.
A.
B.
5.
A.
B.
38
C.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11. B
12. A
13. C
14. C
15. A
16. A
17. A
18. D
19.
20.
39
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
A.
40
B.
31.
32.
33.
41