1216 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No.
6 / Wednesday, January 10, 2007 / Notices
was destined for the United States. In a
November 20, 2006, letter to parties, we
requested comments from parties on
this determination, and received no
comments. Therefore, based on our
review of CBP documents, we are
satisfied there were no entries of subject
merchandise subject to this
administrative review. Accordingly, we
are rescinding the review.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), the
Department may rescind an
administrative review, in whole or with
respect to a particular exporter or
producer, if the Secretary concludes
that, during the period covered by the
review, there were no entries, exports,
or sales of the subject merchandise.
Because the evidence on the record
shows that there were no entries of
OCTG made by Siderca during the POR,
the Department is rescinding this review
in accordance with 19 CFR
351.213(d)(3). The Department will
issue appropriate assessment
instructions to CBP within fifteen days
of publication of this notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under section 351.402(f) of the
Department’s regulations to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in the Secretary’s assumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and subsequent assessment of
double antidumping duties. This notice
also serves as a reminder to parties
subject to administrative protective
order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the disposition of
proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with section
351.305(a)(3) of the Department’s
regulations. Timely written notification
of the return/destruction of APO
materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and the terms of an APO is a
sanctionable violation.
We are issuing and publishing this
notice in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (as
amended) and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4).
Dated: January 3, 2007.
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
Stephen J. Claeys
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration
[FR Doc. E7–193 Filed 1–9–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:22 Jan 09, 2007 Jkt 211001
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
(A–570–886)
Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags from
the People’s Republic of China: Notice
of Extension of Time Limit for the Final
Results of the Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: January 10, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Laurel LaCivita or Matthew Quigley,
AD/CVD Operations, Office 8, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–4243 or (202) 482–
4551, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On September 28, 2005, the
Department of Commerce (‘‘the
Department’’) published in the Federal
Register a notice of initiation of the
antidumping duty administrative review
of Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags
(‘‘PRCBs’’) from the People’s Republic of
China (‘‘PRC’’) for the period January
26, 2004, through July 31, 2005. See
Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews and Request for Revocation in
Part, 70 FR 56631 (September 28, 2005).
On September 13, 2006, the Department
published the preliminary results. See
Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags from
the People’s Republic of China:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review, 71 FR
54021 (September 13, 2006). The final
results are currently due by January 11,
2007.
Extension of Time Limit for Final
Results of Review
Pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the
Act’’), the Department shall make a final
determination in an administrative
review of an antidumping duty order
within 120 days after the date on which
the preliminary determination is
published. The Act further provides,
however, that the Department may
extend that 120-day period to 180 days
if it determines it is not practicable to
complete the review within the
foregoing time period.
The Department finds that it is not
practicable to complete the final results
of the administrative review of PRCBs
PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\10JAN1.SGM
from the PRC within the 120-day period
due to complex issues the parties have
raised regarding the selection of
appropriate financial statements for the
calculation of surrogate financial ratios.
Therefore, in accordance with section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, the Department
is extending the time period for
completion of the final results of this
review to 152 days until February 12,
2007.
This notice is published in
accordance with sections 751(a)(3)(A)
and 777(i) of the Act.
Dated: December 29, 2006.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretaryfor Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E7–192 Filed 1–9–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
(A–533–824)
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet
and Strip from India: Notice of
Rescission, in Part, of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On August 30, 2006, in
response to a timely request from Jindal
Poly Films Limited of India and MTZ
Polyfilms, Ltd., the Department of
Commerce (the Department) initiated an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on
polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film
from India. See Initiation of
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews and Requests
for Revocation in Part, 71 FR 51573
(August 30, 2006) (Initiation Notice).
This administrative review covers the
period July 1, 2005 through June 30,
2006. We are now rescinding the review
of Jindal Poly Films Limited of India as
a result of the withdrawal of its request
for an administrative review of this
order; we are continuing the
administrative review of MTZ
Polyfilms, Ltd.
EFFECTIVE DATE: January 10, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jun
Jack Zhao or Jacqueline Arrowsmith,
AD/CVD Operations, Office 6, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Room 7866, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone number: (202)
482–1396 and (202) 482–5255,
respectively.
10JAN1
 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 6 / Wednesday, January 10, 2007 / Notices
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On July 3, 2006, the Department
published a notice of ‘‘Opportunity to
Request Administrative Review’’ of the
antidumping duty order on PET film
from India for the period of July 1, 2005
through June 30, 2006. See
Antidumping or Countervailing Duty
Order, Finding, or Suspended
Investigation; Opportunity To Request
Administrative Review, 71 FR 37890
(July 3, 2006). On July 31, 2006, Jindal
Poly Films Limited of India (Jindal) and
MTZ Polyfilms, Ltd. (MTZ) requested an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on PET film. In
response to these requests, the
Department of Commerce initiated an
antidumping duty administrative review
on PET film from India. See Initiation
Notice.
On August 25, 2006, pursuant to
section 351.213(d)(1) of the
Department’s regulations, Jindal
withdrew its request for an
administrative review. Section
351.213(d) of the Department’s
regulations states that the Secretary will
rescind an administrative review, in
whole or in part, if a party that
requested the review withdraws the
request within 90 days of the date of
publication of the notice of initiation of
the requested review. We received the
withdrawal of Jindal’s request for
review on August 25, 2006, which is
within the requisite 90 days since the
Initiation Notice was published on July
31, 2006.
Assessment
The Department will instruct U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to
assess antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries. For the company for
which this review is rescinded (Jindal),
antidumping duties shall be assessed at
rates equal to the cash deposit of
estimated antidumping duties required
at the time of entry, or withdrawal from
warehouse, for consumption, in
accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(c)(1)(I). The Department will
issue appropriate assessment
instructions to CBP 15 days after the
publication of this notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in the Secretary’s presumption
VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:22 Jan 09, 2007 Jkt 211001
that reimbursement of antidumping
duties occurred and subsequent
assessment of double antidumping
duties.
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with section 777(i) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19
CFR 351.213(d)(4).
Dated: January 3, 2007.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretaryfor Import
Administration.
[FR Doc. E7–199 Filed 1–9–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmosphere
Administration
Alaska Coastal Management Program:
Incorporation of Revised Coastal
District Management Plans for Cities of
Skagway, Hoonah, and Pelican; and
Deletion of Coastal District
Management Plans for Cities of
Angoon, Hydaburg, Kake, Klawock,
and St. Paul with Associated Areas
Meriting Special Attention; Availability
of Environmental Assessment and
Finding of No Significant Impact
AGENCY: National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration, U.S.
Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of availability of
Environmental Assessment and Finding
of No Significant Impact.
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the
availability of the Environmental
Assessment (EA) and Finding of No
Significant Impact (FONSI) for the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration’s (NOAA) approval of
the State of Alaska’s Coastal
Management Program (ACMP) request
to incorporate revisions to the cities of
Skagway, Hoonah and Pelican’s coastal
district management and plan and to
delete the cites of Angoon, Hydaburg,
Kake, Klawock, and St. Paul coastal
district management plans and
associated Areas Meriting Special
Attention (AMSA) as a routine program
PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\10JAN1.SGM
1217
change to the ACMP. The EA was
prepared pursuant to the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
U.S.A. 4321 et seq. to assess the
environmental impacts associated with
the approval and implementation of
these revisions to the ACMP, which
were submitted to NOAA by the State of
Alaska. Pursuant to Section 306(g) of the
Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972
as amended (CZMA) and NOAA’s Office
of Ocean and Coastal Resource
Management (OCRM) regulations (15
CFR part 923, subpart H), OCRM is
required to approve any amendment,
modification, or other change to a state’s
federally-approved coastal management
program. This includes changes to local
coastal management programs. See 15
CFR part 923, subpart E.
For the purposes of this EA, the
proposed action is approval of the
proposed revisions to three district
coastal management plans and deletion
of the five district coastal management
plans and associated AMSA. These
changes to the ACMP will bring the
three revised district coastal
management plans into compliance
with the recently-approved amendments
to the ACMP, and eliminate five
previously-approved district coastal
management plans and their associated
AMSA. The five districts will no longer
participate at the local level in the
State’s federally-approved coastal zone
management program. The coastal area
in which the five deleted coastal
management programs reside will
continue to be covered by the ACMP’s
federally-approved statewide (rather
than local) policies. However, due to
other recent changes to the ACMP
approved by OCRM, some district area
uses and resources may not receive the
same level of resource coverage,
including subsistence resources.
NOAA finds that the ACMP has met
the requirements for submitting a
routine program change to OCRM and
proposes to approve the program
change. Based upon the EA, NOAA
proposes to conclude that a Finding of
No Significant Impact is appropriate,
and therefore, an Environmental Impact
Statement is unnecessary. The Council
on Environmental Quality’s regulations
to implement NEPA require agencies to
provide public notice of the availability
of environmental documents. 40 CFR
1506.6. This notice is part of NOAA’s
action to comply with this requirement.
A copy of the final EA and the
Finding of No Significant Impact may be
found on OCRM’s Web site at http://
coastalmanagement.noaa.gov/
assessments/welcome.html or may be
obtained upon request from: Helen Bass,
Coastal Programs Division (N/ORM3),
10JAN1