Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
www.elsevier.com/locate/enconman
a,*
Guangzhou Institute of Energy Conversion, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 2 Nengyuan Road, Tianhe, Wushan,
Guangzhou 510640, Peoples Republic of China
b
School of Engineering, Nagoya University, Gofuku, Toyama, Japan
Received 26 December 2004; received in revised form 23 April 2006; accepted 29 October 2006
Available online 12 December 2006
Abstract
A promising application for biomass is liquid fuel synthesis, such as methanol or dimethyl ether (DME). Previous studies have studied
syngas production from biomass-derived char, oil and gas. This study intends to explore the technology of syngas production from direct
biomass gasication, which may be more economically viable. The ratio of H2/CO is an important factor that aects the performance of
this process. In this study, the characteristics of biomass gasication gas, such as H2/CO and tar yield, as well as its potential for liquid
fuel synthesis is explored. A uidized bed gasier and a downstream xed bed are employed as the reactors. Two kinds of catalysts: dolomite and nickel based catalyst are applied, and they are used in the uidized bed and xed bed, respectively. The gasifying agent used is
an air-steam mixture. The main variables studied are temperature and weight hourly space velocity in the xed bed reactor. Over the
ranges of operating conditions examined, the maximum H2 content reaches 52.47 vol%, while the ratio of H2/CO varies between 1.87
and 4.45. The results indicate that an appropriate temperature (750 C for the current study) and more catalyst are favorable for getting
a higher H2/CO ratio. Using a simple rst order kinetic model for the overall tar removal reaction, the apparent activation energies and
pre-exponential factors are obtained for nickel based catalysts. The results indicate that biomass gasication gas has great potential for
liquid fuel synthesis after further processing.
2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Syngas; Biomass; Catalytic gasication
1. Introduction
Syngas plays an important role as an intermediate in the
production of several industrial products, such as Fischer
Tropsch liquids, methanol and ammonia. Currently, syngas is produced from fossil fuels, mainly coal, natural gas
and naphtha. Syngas from renewable resources, such as
biomass, exhibits a promising prospective [17]. This is
because biomass is a CO2 neutral resource and is distributed extensively in the world. Several biomass to methanol
demonstration projects have been developed recently, such
as the Hynol project in the United States, the BioMeet and
0196-8904/$ - see front matter 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2006.10.014
1133
Nomenclature
kinetic constant for tar elimination (m3 (Tb,wet)/
kg h)
A
pre-exponential factor for k (m3 (Tb,wet)/kg h)
R
gas constant (kJ/mol K)
E
apparent activation energy for overall tar removal (kJ/mol)
Q
gas ow rate [m3 (Tb,wet)/h]
T = Tb temperature measured in center of xed bed (C)
Table 1
Proximate and ultimate analysis of pine sawdust
Moisture content (wt% wet basis)
Higher heating value (MJ/kg)
Proximate analysis (wt% dry basis)
Volatile matter
Fixed carbon
Ash
Ultimate analysis (wt% dry basis)
C
H
O
N
S
8
20.2
81.0
18.5
0.5
51.26
5.54
42.29
0.18
0.23
X
W
Greek Symbols
o
tar concentration in ue gas (kg/m3)
s
space time, dened as W/Q [kg h/m3(Tb,wet)]
Table 2
Chemical composition of uncalcined dolomite (wt%)
Sample
CaO
MgO
SiO2
Al2O3
Fe2O3
Loss
Total
Dolomite
31.2
19.5
2.35
0.34
0.24
46.15
99.78
1134
Valve
T
T,P
Cyclone
Gasifier
To
exhaust
burner
Fixed-bed
reactor
Gas and tar
sampling
Heators
T
Hopper
Steam
flowmeter
T,P
Steam
generator
Air distributor
Air
compressor
Gas
flowmeter
Prior to each test, an amount of 120 g/(kg h1) biomass calcined dolomite mixed with 30 g silica sand (0.2
0.3 mm) were put in the gasier. Since calcined dolomite
is soft, it erodes during the test and is eluted out of the
bed with the ue exit gas. Therefore, some calcined dolomite was mixed with the pine sawdust carefully by hand
and continuously fed into the gasier to attain a steady
state. The feeding rate of calcined dolomite was determined by preliminary test. At the end of each test, calcined dolomite left in the gasier is separated and
measured. Thus, the weight percent of calcined dolomite
in the gasier bed during operation can be known, and
it is about 6571 wt% over the ranges of experimental
conditions examined.
Electric
heating
The measurement accuracy for the gas ow meter, temperature sensor, manometer, steam ow meter is 0.06
N m3/h, 10 C, 0.25 kPa, 0.05 kg/h, respectively.
To ensure the reliability of the test data, each experiment was repeated 2 times and the results had good agreement. The data reported in this paper is average values of
the two times.
2.3. Gas and tar analysis
The cool, dry, clean gas was sampled using gas bags and
analyzed on a gas chromatograph (Model GC-2010, Shimadzu, Japan), which is tted with a GS carbon plot
column (30 m 0.530 mm 3.00 lm), ame ionization
Steel tube
Ice bath
Cool bath
1135
2
3
4.4
Value of H2/CO
4.2
4.0
3.8
3.6
3.4
3.2
3.0
650
700
750
800
850
Temperature ()
Fig. 3. Eect of temperature on the value of H2/CO.
Table 3
Operating conditions in the uidized bed reactor
Run no.
Run no.
0.54
0.65
0.4
0.25
Steam-to-biomass ratio
Calcined dolomite feeding rate (g/h)
Calcined dolomite in the gasier (g)
Gasier bed temperature (C)
0.85
14
56
800
0.75
16
65
800
Run no.
H2
CH4
CO
CO2
C2
1
2
38.38
38.13
7.02
7.48
24.89
26.06
27.62
26.20
2.09
2.14
1.56
1.54
13.85
19.05
Table 4
Experimental results of dierent xed bed temperature at the condition of run no. 1
Reactor temperature (C)
Dry, inert-free, gas composition (vol%)
H2
CH4
CO
CO2
C2
Gas yield (N m3/kg biomass) (wet basis)
Tar yield (g/kg biomass) (wet basis)
650
46.28
5.24
14.89
32.16
1.42
1.87
6.43
700
49.33
4.89
12.28
32.81
0.69
2.12
5.53
750
49.65
4.37
11.15
34.37
0.46
2.15
4.42
800
50.23
4.3
12.3
32.56
0.6
2.24
4.29
850
52.47
2.9
14.82
29.65
0.16
2.41
2.35
1136
Table 5
Experimental results of dierent reactor WHSV (h1) at the condition of run no. 2, Tb = 700 C
WHSV (h1)
10.7
7.2
5.4
4.3
3.6
3.1
2.7
42.84
6.59
20.35
28.62
1.61
1.86
46.67
5.67
17.35
29.42
0.9
1.97
47.61
5.18
16.44
30.12
0.66
2.01
47.62
4.79
16.87
30.08
0.65
2.09
47.84
5.12
15.93
30.18
0.94
2.13
48.93
5.14
15.33
29.99
0.62
2.19
49.09
4.72
14.78
30.73
0.64
2.22
3.4
Tb=700
Tb=800
3.2
Value of H2/CO
3.0
2.8
2.6
2.4
2.2
2.0
1.8
10
12
Table 6 lists a comparison of the dierent routes for biosyngas production and process D represents this study. As
Table 6 indicates, process A yields the least hydrogen,
-1
Table 6
Comparison of dierent routes for bio-syngas production
Process
A [11]
B [13]
C [14]
Feedstock
Gasifying agent
Reforming method
Use of catalyst
Typical gas composition (dry, inert-free,
mol%)
H2
CO
CO2
CH4
Others
Range of H2/CO
Biomass-derived oil
H2 and N2
No
Biomass-derived char
Steam
No
Biomass-derived gas
Air-steam
Biogas or CH4 reforming
Yes
Biomass
Air-steam
Yes
33.3
29.0
4.9
17.0
15.8
1.152.41
70.0
14.8
14.1
1.1
4.07.0
57.64
36.62
3.07
2.38
1.421.57
52.47
14.82
29.65
2.9
0.16
1.874.45
1137
Fig. 5. Gas chromatogram of tar sample in the inlet of xed bed reactor.
Fig. 6. Gas chromatogram of tar sample in the exit of xed bed reactor.
1138
ln(k)
3.8
3.6
3.4
3.2
3.0
0.00090
0.00095
0.00100
0.00105
0.00110
1/T(1/K)
Acknowledgements
3.4. Tar yield analysis and kinetic model construction for tar
cracking
Figs. 5 and 6 show the gas chromatogram of tar samples
taken from the inlet and outlet of the xed bed reactor,
respectively. It is obvious that both the species and the
quantity of tar are reduced greatly in the presence of nickel
based catalysts.
Although there are hundreds of species in the tar sample, in order to simplify the analysis, all the species are treated as a single one lump. This approach has been accepted
by many institutions working worldwide in catalytic hot
gas cleaning [18]. It uses the following single rst order
kinetic equation:
d@
k@
dt
which can be used in integrated form, working under piston or plug ow conditions, as
k ln1 X =s
The nancial support received from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project No. 50576100),
Guangdong Province Key Laboratory Open Foundation
(Project No. 50610117) and Guangdong Province Natural
Science Foundation (Project No. 003045) is gratefully
appreciated.
References
[1] Bridgwater AV, Double JM. Production costs of liquid fuel from
biomass. Fuel 1991;70(10):120924.
[2] Dong Y, Steinberg M. Hynolan economic process for methanol
production from biomass and natural gas with reduced CO2 emission.
Int J Hydrogen Energy 1997;22(1011):9717.
[3] Hamelinck CN, Faaij APC. Future prospects for production of
methanol and hydrogen from biomass. J Power Sources
2002;111(1):122.
[4] Chmielniak T, Sciazko M. Co-gasication of biomass and
coal for methanol synthesis. Appl Energy 2003;74(34): 393
403.
[5] Tijmensen MJA, Faaij APC, Hamelinck CN, van Hardeveld MRM.
Exploration of the possibilities for production of FischerTropsch
liquids and power via biomass gasication. Biomass Bioenergy
2002;23(2):12952.
[6] Faaij A, Hamelinck C, Tijmensen M. Long term perspectives for
production of fuels from biomass; integrated assessment and R&D
priorities preliminary results. In: Kyritsis S et al., editors. In:
Proceedings of the rst world conference on biomass for energy
and industry. London, UK: James & James Ltd., 2001. vol. 1/2,
p. 687.
[7] Larson ED, Jin H. Biomass conversion to FischerTropsch liquids:
preliminary energy balances. In: Overend R, Chornet E, editors.
Proceedings of the fourth biomass conference of the Americas. UK: Elsevier Science Kidlington; 1999. p. 43.
[8] Norbeck JM, Johnson K. http://www.methanol.org/pdf/Hynolexec.
pdf, 2000.
RL, Ekbom T. http://www.ecotrac.se/pdf/isafxii.pdf.
[9] Brandberg A
[10] Mitsubishi Heavy Industries. Biomass gasication methanol synthesis
system.
http://www.mhi.co.jp/power/e_power/techno/biomass/,
April, 2006.
[11] Panigrahi S, Dalai AK, Chaudhari ST, Bakhshi NN. Synthesis gas
production from steam gasication of biomass-derived oil. Energy
Fuels 2003;17(3):63742.
[12] Chaudhari ST, Bej SK, Bakhshi NN, Dalai AK. Steam gasication of
biomass-derived char for the production of carbon monoxide-rich
synthesis gas. Energy Fuels 2001;15(3):73642.
1139