Federal Register / Vol. 71, No.
245 / Thursday, December 21, 2006 / Notices
The proposed information collection is
published to obtain comments from the
public and affected agencies. Comments
are encouraged and will be accepted
until February 20, 2007. This process is
conducted in accordance with 5 CFR
1320.10.
All comments, suggestions, or
questions regarding additional LEOKA
information, to include obtaining a copy
of the proposed information collection
instrument with instructions, should be
directed to Mr. Gregory E. Scarbro, Unit
Chief, Federal Bureau of Investigation,
Criminal Justice Information Services
(CJIS) Division, Module E–3, 1000
Custer Hollow Road, Clarksburg, West
Virginia 26306, or facsimile to (304)
625–3566.
Written comments and suggestions
from the public and affected agencies
concerning the proposed collection of
information are encouraged. Comments
should address one or more of the
following four points:
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques of
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Overview of This Information
Collection
(1) Type of information collection:
Revision of a currently approved
collection.
(2) The title of the form/collection:
Law Enforcement Officers Killed or
Assaulted.
(3) The agency form number, if any,
and the applicable component of the
department sponsoring the collection:
Form 1–705; Criminal Justice
Information Services Division, Federal
Bureau of Investigation, Department of
Justice.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
(4) Affected public who will be asked
or required to respond, as well as a brief
abstract: Primary: City, county, State,
Federal, and tribal law enforcement
agencies.
VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:01 Dec 20, 2006 Jkt 211001
76689
This collection is needed to collect
information on officers killed or
assaulted in the line of duty committed
throughout the United States. Data are
tabulated and published in the annual
Law Enforcement Officers Killed and
Assaulted publication.
(5) An estimate of the total number of
respondents and the amount of time
estimated for an average respondent to
respond: There are approximately
17,499 law enforcement agency
participants; calculated estimates
indicate 7 minutes for respondents to
complete hard copy and 5 minutes for
electronic submission completion.
(6) An estimate of the total public
burden (in hours) associated with this
collection: There are approximately
20,448 hours, annual burden, associated
with this information collection.
If additional information is required
contact: Lynn Bryant, Department
Clearance Officer, Policy and Planning
Staff, Justice Management Division,
United States Department of Justice,
Patrick Henry Building, Suite 1600, 601
D Street, NW., Washington, DC 20530.
Dated: December 15, 2006.
Lynn Bryant,
Department Clearance Officer, United States
Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. E6–21817 Filed 12–20–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Office of the Secretary
Submission for OMB Review:
Comment Request
December 15, 2006.
The Department of Labor (DOL) has
submitted the following public
information collection requests (ICR) to
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13,
44 U.S.C. chapter 35). A copy of each
ICR, with applicable supporting
documentation, may be obtained from
RegInfo.gov at http://www.reginfo.gov/
public/do/PRAMain or by contacting
Darrin King on 202–693–4129 (this is
not a toll-free number) / e-mail:
king.darrin@dol.gov.
Comments should be sent to Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Attn: OMB Desk Officer for the
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA), Office of
Management and Budget, Room 10235,
Washington, DC 20503, Telephone:
202–395–7316/Fax: 202–395–6974
(these are not a toll-free numbers),
PO 00000 Frm 00059 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\21DEN1.SGM
within 30 days from the date of this
publication in the Federal Register.
The OMB is particularly interested in
comments which:
• Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
• Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
• Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Agency: Occupational Safety and
Health Administration.
Type of Review: Extension without
change of currently approved collection.
Title: Ethylene Oxide (EtO) (29 CFR
1910.1047).
OMB Number: 1218–0108.
Type of Response: Recordkeeping and
Third party disclosure.
Affected Public: Business or other for-
profits.
Number of Respondents: 5,474.
Number of Annual Responses:
209,328.
Estimated Time per Response: Varies
by task.
Total Burden Hours: 42,732.
Total Annualized capital/startup
costs: $0.
Total Annual Costs (operating/
maintaining systems or purchasing
services): $6,369,781.
Description: The standard requires
employers to monitor employee
exposure to EtO, to provide medical
surveillance, to train employees about
the hazards of EtO, and to establish and
maintain accurate records of employee
exposure to EtO. These records will be
used by employers, employees,
physicians, and the Government to
ensure that employees are not harmed
by exposure to EtO.
Agency: Occupational Safety and
Health Administration.
Type of Review: New collection
(request for a new OMB control
number).
Title: OSHA’s Conflict of Interest and
Disclosure Form.
OMB Number: 1218–0NEW.
Type of Response: Reporting.
21DEN1
 76690 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 245 / Thursday, December 21, 2006 / Notices
Affected Public: Individuals or
Households.
Number of Respondents: 36.
Number of Annual Responses: 36.
Estimated Time per Response: Varies
from 30 minutes to 1 hour.
Total Burden Hours: 27.
Total Annualized capital/startup
costs: $0.
Total Annual Costs (operating/
maintaining systems or purchasing
services): $0.
Description: The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
published the Final Information Quality
Bulletin for Peer Review on December
15, 2004. The Bulletin established that
important scientific information shall be
peer reviewed by qualified specialists
before it is disseminated by the federal
government. Peer review is one of the
important procedures used to ensure
that the quality of published
information meets the standards of the
scientific and technical community. It is
a form of deliberation involving an
exchange of judgments about the
appropriateness of methods and the
strength of the author’s inferences. Peer
review involves the review of a draft
product for quality by specialists in the
field who were not involved in
producing the draft. The selection of
participants in a peer review is based on
expertise, with due consideration of
independence and conflict of interest.
The Bulletin states ‘‘* * * the agency
must address reviewers’ potential
conflicts of interest (including those
stemming from ties to regulated
businesses and other stakeholders) and
independence from the agency.’’ The
Conflict of Interest and Disclosure form
will be used to determine whether or
not a conflict of interest exists for a
potential peer review panel member.
Darrin A. King,
Acting Departmental Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. E6–21797 Filed 12–20–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–26–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Office of the Secretary
Submission for OMB Review:
Comment Request
December 15, 2006.
The Department of Labor (DOL) has
submitted the following public
information collection requests (ICR) to
the Office of Management and Budget
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
(OMB) for review and approval in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13,
44 U.S.C. chapter 35). A copy of each
ICR, with applicable supporting
VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:01 Dec 20, 2006 Jkt 211001
documentation, may be obtained from
RegInfo.gov at http://www.reginfo.gov/
public/do/PRAMain or by contacting
Darrin King on 202–693–4129 (this is
not a toll-free number)/e-mail:
king.darrin@dol.gov.
Comments should be sent to Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Attn: OMB Desk Officer for the
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA), Office of
Management and Budget, Room 10235,
Washington, DC 20503, Telephone:
202–395–7316/Fax: 202–395–6974
(these are not toll-free numbers), within
30 days from the date of this publication
in the Federal Register.
The OMB is particularly interested in
comments which:
• Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
• Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
• Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Agency: Occupational Safety and
Health Administration.
Type of Review: Extension without
change of currently approved collection.
Title: Ethylene Oxide (EtO) (29 CFR
1910.1047).
OMB Number: 1218–0108.
Type of Response: Recordkeeping and
Third Party disclosure.
Affected Public: Business or other for-
profits.
Number of Respondents: 5,474.
Number of Annual Responses:
209,328.
Estimated Time per Response: Varies
by task.
Total Burden Hours: 42,732.
Total Annualized capital/startup
costs: $0.
Total Annual Costs (operating/
maintaining systems or purchasing
services): $6,369,781.
Description: The standard requires
employers to monitor employee
exposure to EtO, to provide medical
surveillance, to train employees about
the hazards of EtO, and to establish and
PO 00000 Frm 00060 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\21DEN1.SGM
maintain accurate records of employee
exposure to EtO. These records will be
used by employers, employees,
physicians, and the Government to
ensure that employees are not harmed
by exposure to EtO.
Agency: Occupational Safety and
Health Administration.
Type of Review: New collection
(request for a new OMB control
number).
Title: OSHA’s Conflict of Interest and
Disclosure Form.
OMB Number: 1218–0NEW.
Type of Response: Reporting.
Affected Public: Individuals or
Households.
Number of Respondents: 36.
Number of Annual Responses: 36.
Estimated Time per Response: Varies
from 30 minutes to 1 hour.
Total Burden Hours: 27.
Total Annualized capital/startup
costs: $0.
Total Annual Costs (operating/
maintaining systems or purchasing
services): $0.
Description: The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
published the Final Information Quality
Bulletin for Peer Review on December
15, 2004. The Bulletin established that
important scientific information shall be
peer reviewed by qualified specialists
before it is disseminated by the Federal
Government. Peer review is one of the
important procedures used to ensure
that the quality of published
information meets the standards of the
scientific and technical community. It is
a form of deliberation involving an
exchange of judgments about the
appropriateness of methods and the
strength of the author’s inferences. Peer
review involves the review of a draft
product for quality by specialists in the
field who were not involved in
producing the draft. The selection of
participants in a peer review is based on
expertise, with due consideration of
independence and conflict of interest.
The Bulletin states ‘‘* * * the agency
must address reviewers’ potential
conflicts of interest (including those
stemming from ties to regulated
businesses and other stakeholders) and
independence from the agency. The
Conflict of Interest and Disclosure form
will be used to determine whether or
not a conflict of interest exists for a
potential peer review panel member.
Darrin A. King,
Acting Departmental Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. E6–21798 Filed 12–20–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–26–P
21DEN1