Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
YULIYONO
A 4010 0090
By
YULIYONO
A 4010 0090
BY USING PIE
(POINT, ILLUSTRATION, EXPLANATION)
By
Tolitoli,.....................2014
Advisor I
Advisor II
( RUSLAN, S.Pd )
( HAERUL, S.Pd )
Acknowledge by
Head of English Education Departement
TABLE OF CONTEN
COVER PAGE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
APPROVAL SHEET . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
i
ii
TABLE OF CONTENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1.2 Problem Statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1.3 Objective of The Research . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1.4 Significance of the Research . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1.5 Scope and Limitation of The Research . . . . . . . . .
1.6 Defenition of Key Terms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CHAPTR II
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATUR
2.1 Design o Research . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.2 Theoritical Framework . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.3 Hypotesis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CHAPTER III RESEARC METHODOLOGY
3.1 Design of Research . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.2 Population and Sample . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.3 Technique of Colecting. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.4 Data Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
REFERENSI
iii
1
5
5
5-6
6
6-7
6
6
9
10
10
12
13
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
All praise be to Allah, the lord of the world the master of judgement day
and the creator to everything in this universe. Due to his mercy and aim the writer
can write this proposal as a rule and regulation in preparation to do the research.
On this occasion, the writer would like to express her deepest thanks to
some people that have important role during her proposal accomplishment.
1) The writer needs to express her Special thanks and appreciation go to his
beloved parents, Rostyati Tonapa and Laurensius.S, for their endeavor and
prayer, motivation, education, and uncountable materials during her study.
2) The writer give special thank to her aunt, Rut Tonapa and her uncle,
Ahmad saadu for them support, kindness, motivation, prayer and
everything them give to the writer.
3) The writers deep appreciation to her first consultant , Ruslan, S.Pd and
HairulS.Pd as her second consultant, for their kindness, guidance and
assistances,
supports,
meaningful
ideas,
suggestions,
motivations,
comments and revisionas from the beginning to the end of her proposal.
4) The writer also likes to express her great thanks to the Head of English
Department, ............., S.Pd., M.Pd, and all lecturers of English Study
Program, for their guidance during her study at Madako University.
5) The writer special thanks is also for her familly and her senior Moh. Haris
Badar, S.pd, for them prayer, guidance, and support
6) The writer also gives her appreciation for all of her friends at English
Department that give support and suggestion to her
Tolitoli,
March, 2014
2014
REFERENCES
Cross. 1998. Classroom Research: Imlementing the scholarship of teaching. New
Jersey: Lotus
Gay L.G. 1990. Educational Reseach. New York. Macmilan Publishing company.
Hermer J. (2007). The Practice of English Language Teaching. Cambiridge: UK,
Pearson Longman.
Hermer, Jeremy. 2000. The Practice English Language Teaching. Kuala Lumpur:
Logman.
Http: // does. Google.com / viewer
Esl - Jk 15 - uiuc.blogspot. com / 2013/ 01/ p i e
Nunam, D. (ed). 2003. Practice English Language Teaching. New York: Mc Grow
Hill.
Proposal
PUSKURNAS, Standar3w2A11!1
PROPOSAL
YULIYONO
A 4010 0090
By
YULIYONO
A 4010 0090
MADAKO UNIVERSITY
TOLITOLI
2014
AGREEMENT PAGE
THE EFFECTIVENESS OF MEDIA ANIMAL CARTOON
PICTURES IN IMPROVING STUDENTS ABILITY IN
WRITING NARRATIVE TEXT
By
YULIYONO
A 4010 0024
Has Been Agreed by The Advisors for Further Approval
by The Board Examiners
Tolitoli,.....................2014
Advisor I
Advisor II
( Herti, S.Pd, MM )
Acknowledge by
Head of English Education Department
APPENDIX 1.
PRE-TEST
APPENDIX 3.
POST-TEST
Score
Level
4
3
2
4
3
2
4
3
2
4
3
4
3
2
Criteria
EXCELLENT TO VERY GOOD: knowledgeable; substantive; thorough
development of thesis; relevant to the assigned topic.
GOOD TO AVERAGE: Some knowledge of the subject; adequate range;
limited development of thesis; mostly relevant to the topic, but lacks detail.
FAIR TO POOR: limited knowledge of the subject; little substance;
EXCELLENT TO VERY GOOD: fluent expression; ideas clearly stated /
supported; succinct; well-organized; logical sequencing; cohesive.
GOOD TO AVERAGE: somewhat choppy; loosely organized but main
ideas stand out; logical but incomplete sequencing.
FAIR TO POOR: non-fluent; ideas confused or disconnected; lacks logical
EXCELLENT TO VERY GOOD: sophisticated range; effective word /
idiom choice and usage; word from mastery; appropriate register.
GOOD TO AVERAGE: adequate range; occasional errors of word / idiom
form, choice, usage but meaning not obscured.
FAIR TO POOR: limited range; frequent errors of word / idiom form,
EXCELLENT TO VERY GOOD: effective complex constructions; few
errors of agreement, tense, number, word order / function, articles,
pronouns, preposition.
GOOD TO AVERAGE: effective but simple constructions; minor problems
in complex constructions; several errors in agreement, tense, number, word
EXCELLENT TO VERY GOOD: demonstrates mastery of conventions,
few errors of spelling, punctuation, capitalization, paragraphing.
GOOD TO AVERAGE: Occasional errors of spelling, punctuation,
capitalization, paragraphing, but meaning not obscured.
FAIR TO POOR: frequent errors of spelling, punctuation, capitalization,
APPENDIX
TREATMENT