Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
FINI~
KI~NT
ANALYSIS OF EXCAVATION
ABSTRACT
The finite element method has often been used to simulate excavation.
When the soll is linearly elastic, the results of excavation should be
independent of the number of stages in the excavation process, and lack of
such independence
indicates an incorrect procedure.
The simple direct
method described in this paper provides the required independence In the
case of linearly elastic materials, and hence can be used for multl-stage
excavation
in non-linear
problems
without
excessive
errors.
However
methods whose errors increase with the number of stages of excavation are
quite unsuitable for non-llnear problems.
Alternative methods of analysis,
errors arising from the inability of the elements to model adequately
the
stress gradients near the toe of the excavation and excavation adjacent to
a diaphragm wall are discussed.
INTROML~FION
The
finite
potentially
However,
element
powerful
method
tool
for
provides
geotechnlcal
simulation
of
the
engineers
excavation
with
process.
errors
are to be avoided.
For example
errors
Christian
discovered
braced excavations.
as
few
stages
concentration
While
as
while
and Wong
in reference
developing
a program
They concluded
possible,
to simulate
that excavations
because
trouble
reported
arises
some serious
construction
of
should be simulated
in
when
points
of stress
are excavated.
it may
be
satisfactory
to simulate
an
excavation
in
linearly
207
208
elastic
material
unlikely
to
be
by
excavation
satisfactory
in
when
one
stage,
this
the
material
form of
behaviour
simulation
is
non-linear.
Hence the authors of this paper sought a method which did not introduce
errors
referred
elastic
as
to above.
This method
shown
in
intended
reference
as
the
should
[2].
basis
checked
be independent
Such
for
could be
method
simulation
is
of
for
is
the
the
linearly
excavation
here,
in
and
is
non-linear
materials.
EXCAVATION SIMULATION"
The
basic
aspects
of
simulation
shaded
portion
of excavation
by
the
finite
element
A is to be excavated,
leaving
the unshaded
portion B.
the
tractions
(T) which
were
previously
internal
stresses
Simulation
of
determination
of
of
the
stage
as shown in Fig.l(c).
determination
stiffness
for example by
involves
the
of
in the soil
of excavation
soil mass
thus
B, and application
of tractions
-~ to the
Finite
(a)
element
implementation
of
this
process
involves
(b)
()
FIGURE i.
Simulation of Excavation
determination
209
of
the
nodal
forces
which
are
equivalent
to
the
tractions
shown
in
Fig. l (c).
methods
lent
nodal
were
dependent
involving
forces
from known
determination
values
These
and as Christian
in reference
to determine
[3]
the excavation
report
and equlva-
except
when
which
a high
The implementation
and Nong
say,
of
the method
problem.
that
boundary
and Wong
gave results
of excavation,
and Mana
Christian
of tractions
of stress.
of stages
laborious,
proposed
of methods.
appears
Clough
direct
on the number
order polynomial
such methods
out by a variety
blana in reference
[4]
forces as
~
in which
unexcavated
vector,
in
is
reference
column
number
elements,
and
results
the
report
elements.
Desal
which
and
this paper,
each
work
stresses
is
unable
excavation
Sargand
propose
to
produce
correct
using
of stresses,
hybrid
but includes
equation
forces
that total
of excavation.
are
with
including
tractions.
body
boundary
o is the stress
However,
Then
as
the
terms
is shown
due
conceptually
and
external
equillbrit~n
While
methods
simpler,
the
tractions
to stresses,
throughout
method
is
of
integrathe
maintained
on extrapolation
recommended
body
section
numerical
is approximately
based
is to start
in the next
in such a way
stage
and
a common
strain matrix,
method
involving
approach,
external
tion of stresses,
mass,
have
An alternative
from the virtual
this
that
problem
integration of surface
forces
which
stress model,
of elements
B is the displacement
for a simple
of
f sTo dV
m=l v
soil
at
of known
easier
to
210
implement
~Ithout
loss
of
accuracy.
Other
will
in general
solutions
give
incorrect
integration
of body
forces
results,
methods,
which
to the total
strain
although
to some problems.
no'
The
soil mass
the
excavation,
excavation
strains are
is subject
to body
and
after
and
~i
i-th
stage
of
tractions
excavation
the
Fig.2.
t outside
stresses
and
respectively.
to determine
to simulate
~i
the
~o~
iili
.~o: O
Initk~l
store
g=.~l
~ : . o -o
Vo---
-.~o = D .~1
J
V~
End of f i r s t
stage
ti1t
_~ = .~2
O'2- O1 = D (e2-el)
End of s e c o n d stage
FIGURE 2.
211
The
impose
stage
procedure
an arbitrary
of
performed
the
adopted
(virtual)
excavation.
during
i-th
stage
incremental
for determination
Then
nodal
by
that displacement,
of
excavation
displacement
equating
nodal
of these
the
at
the
internal
the nodal
forces
forces
end
and
of
to
the
i-th
external
work
required
based
is
to simulate
can
be
determined,
on
be
6u
total
not
equilibrium.
strains and
nodal displacements
be
6e
and ~a.
Equating
f(6~T~i)dV
= f (~uT!)dV +
Vi
where
(1)
f(~T!)dS
Vi
S i is the surface
Si
excavation.
Now writing
equation
A~i
ffi ~i
A~i
ffi ~i
Ao
i~
DAei~
Zi-1
where D
matrix
is
the
incremental
stress-strain
f(~cT(Aoi + Zi_l))dV
Vi ~
= f (~uT~) dv + f(6~T~)dS
Vi ~ ~
f(6~TDA~i)dV
Vi
f(~aTBTDBAai)dV
Vi
Si
-f(6Toi_l)dV
Vi
+ f(6uT~)dV + f(eTt)dS
Vi ~ ~
Si
(2)
212
Since the above relationship holds for arbitrary displacements
(~(BTDB)dV)Aa
Vi
= -f(BToI_I)dV+f(NTy)dV + f(NTt)dS
Vi
- _
VI
Si
K'A~i
= [i,i-1
+ ~i + ~i
(3)
tion of ~i-l' ~
and
the body over which the integration takes place, and the second subscript
(if any) indicates the stress state which is integrated.
to be applied
f, g and
to retain
h~
total equilibrium
in carrying
out the
i-th
stage of excavation.
Restricting
attention
now
to
the
linearly
elastic
case,
it
is
of
f(6~ TD ~i)dV
Vi
(4)
making
this
~o
substitution
(5)
in
equation
(4)
and
converting
to
finite
element form
K'~i
Equation
precisely
(6)
ffi ~i,O +
corresponds
equivalent
to
to
repeated
~i
~i
single
application
(6)
stage
of
excavation,
equation
(3)
and
for
is
the
linearly elastic case, provided that the sample points used to evaluate the
stiffness matrix are also used to evaluate the nodal forces corresponding
to each
'initial stress'.
213
obtained due to inadequate
finite
elements,
number
of excavation
achieves
the
multi-stage
no
representation
additional
stages,
theoretically
errors
be
if this method
correct
caused
by
is used.
equality
increasing
Hence
between
by the
the
this method
single-stage
and
Gauss
per
excavation.
DISCUSSION OF RXSULI'S
Finite
element
element
and
analyses
the
meshes
were
shown
carried
in
out
Fig.3,
using
which
P,|
consist
1"0
Im
1'0
1.0
smoot h ~
1"0
fixed
1.0
0.9 0.1
~--------0.1
"~'0.2
smooth~
0.1k~7 1'0 1.0 1-0 1.0 1-0
(b)
1.0
"'fixed
o.1 0.2
not to scale
~0<)6
"'I;',;~1111
.' ., .I.I.I I I,I,I,I,
~0"06
IIII
smooth~__
(c)
0"72
Y/) IIII
III111111 0
1.0 " 0 . 7 2
1.0 1.0 1-0 1.0 " ' f i x e d
b o6cb(b(b66
FIGURE 3.
points
of
8-noded
214
isoparametric
rectangles,
excavation
consisting
of
the
The excavated
carried
one
displacements
whether
was
and where
out
horizontal
obtained
at
in
row
the
one-stage,
of
or
elements.
completion
of
in
In
several
each
excavation
Poisson's
discussed
ratio
in this
(v) was
0.47,
paper
Young's
Ko
= 0.5
shown
in
and
stages
case
the
were
analyses
isotropic
(E) was
the unit
weight
each
nodal
identical,
stages.
modulus
and
For all
I0,000 kPa,
of
the
soil
was 20 kN/m 3 .
Analyses
using
the
mesh
to be excavated.
3(a),
were
also
carried
out
of stresses
This was
Fig.
points
in the elements
line to the
resulting values of stress on the excavation boundary for each element, and
/l/'/~'2'
,// ~
/:~ /
JJ I
"k~
"-~
3
Proposed Method
Stress Extrapolation:
2 Stage. 0.Sm Elements o o o
2 Stage, ~Om Elements . . . . .
4 Stage, C)-Srn Elements . . . . . . .
Displacements
215
calculation
carried
of
the
out with
into elements
equivalent
the
nodal
two upper
each of height
forces.
rows
of
0.5 m,
Two
elements
similar
in
Fig.
analyses
3(a)
were
subdivided
displacements
recommended
method,
shown in Fig. 4.
recommended
using
number
of
the
analyses
Excavation
the stress
in 2 stages
and
method,
but
based
progressively
and 4 stages.
on
stress
extrapolation
are
extrapolation
excavation
The
method,
Similar
stages
greater
were
when
errors
the excavation
increases
reported
are
in error
by
seen
occur,
is carried
with
Christian
to
an
out
increasing
and
Wong
when
evaluating nodal forces only from elements near the excavation (not using a
high
order
polynomial
note
that at most
for
depths
extrapolation).
there
is a smaller
However
error
it is of
interest
for 2 stage
to
excavation
Nodal forces were found to arise only on the excavated boundary of the
current
to
nodal
is
the
forces
arising
from
the
body
forces
ignored,
vertical
forces arise at every node in the soil mass, and produce grossly erroneous
results.
on
the
excavated
boundary,
a reasonably
obtained.
Table i shows
the vertical
excavated
in
stage
the
first
of
stresses
forces
of
nodal
and
body
forces
for each of
forces on
excavation
the
are
satisfactory
using
the boundary
the
mesh
The contributions
shown
relevant
separately,
nodes,
solution
whose
is
to be
shown
arising
in
from
as well as
numbers
and
216
TABLE i
Vertical Nodal Forces (kN)
Node
fBTo dV
fNT~ dV
Total
7
13
21
27
35
36
37
1.67
20.00
3.33
20.00
-1.67
6.67
-1.67
1.67
-6 67
3.33
-6.67
5.00
-6.67
1.67
3.33
13.33
6.67
13.33
3.33
0
0
Total
48.33
-8.33
40.00
--Node
Numbers ( ~
.0.5
o 1 2 3 4 5 Cram)/ ~
1.5
(>5
It
can be
significant
seen
error
that
in the
ignoring
vertical
two
significant
rows
of
effect
elements
on
the
the body
nodal
forces.
Refinement
into
final
force contributions,
Similar
errors
leads
to
occur
in
elements
of
displacements.
height
0.5
Despite
these
m,
had
errors
no
in
217
vertical
nodal
excavation
forces,
resulting
integration
from
body
final
use
displacements
of
the
of
and non-boundary
displacements
as shown in Fig. 5.
The recommended
solution
for
the
since
solution
for
one-stage
selected
method
mesh,
excavation
provides
it
using
a solution
is
which
boundary
method,
forces,
of
the
and
stress
produce
similar
precisely
this
mesh.
the
same
However
is reasonably
as
the
this
stress
similar
except
mesh in f
c/ /a
the
recommended
forces
integration
ignoring
the
I
I
Horizontal
points.
A very coarse
to model
Better
of a
deflections
mesh
representation
finer
mesh
displacements.
element analyses
near
in Fig.3(a)
corner,
should
in this region,
produce
cannot be expected
more
accurate
by the use
values
by means of additional
shown in Fig.3(b)
and (c).
of
finite
The resulting
218
horizontal
nodal
displacements
along
the vertical
in deflection
of the
excavated
face
for
top corner
of the excavation
the
leads
of 15%,
increase
in
deflection of 3%.
It is also of
interest
Fig.7
finite
which
to examine
element
include
the effects
analyses
a concrete
were
carried
diaphragm
of
changes
in element
to a diaphragm wall.
out on the meshes
wall.
The wall
For
shown
deflections
~,
/
srnooth
i 1'0
L~fixed
1.O
1.0
....~ 0-1
~0.2
0.7
f
smooth.
0
FIGURE 7.
The
present,
effect
of
1 0.5
refining
as the increase
is only 10%.
1.0
"
0 1-0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1-0 ' f i x e d
the
mesh
in deflection
is
smaller
than
when
no
wall
was
219
Finer mesh
4 Gauss points
//
I
9 Gcuss points
3
2
Well deflection (ram)
FIGURE 8.
CONCLUSIONS
This produces
results
The implementation
of this method appears to be more economical to program than the high order
polynomial
fitting proposed
in reference
than
very
220
ACKIIOIIL~IqTS
The work described in this paper was carried out with the aid of a
grant from the Australian Research Grants Committee.
REIzgRENCKS
i.
2.
Ishihara, K.,
Relations between process of cutting and uniqueness of solutions.
Soils Fdns. (Japan). IO (1970) 50-65.
3.
4.
Mana, A.I.,
Finite element analysis of deep excavation behaviour.
Ph.D. Thesisp Stanford University, Stanford, Calif. (1976).
5.