Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
CONTENTS
GLOSSARY .................................................................................................................... 3
1. OVERVIEW............................................................................................................... 5
2. OPERATION, POLICY & PROCEDURE ........................................................................ 9
3. SIGNING AND VISIBILITY ........................................................................................ 15
4. MAINTENANCE ...................................................................................................... 16
5. ENFORCEMENT ..................................................................................................... 25
6. ENFORCEMENT PRIORITISATION ........................................................................... 27
7. FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUESTS AND ENQUIRIES ..................................... 31
APPENDIX A ............................................................................................................... 33
Page 2 of 35
GLOSSARY
3G
ADSL
ANPR
BT
Buffer
CTO
DfT
FOI
FPN
GM
GMCRP or
Partnership
GMP
GMRAPG
GPS
HE
HFAS
Highway
Authority
HOTA
Housing
ITN
JRSG
KSI
LA
Page 3 of 35
Location
Loop
PIC
Piezo
PSU
RCD
RLC
RTC
Safety Camera
SLO
TfGM
TSRGD
UTC
Compliance with these protocols and procedures has no bearing upon the enforcement of
offences detected by the use of safety cameras, none compliance with them by the
Partnership or representatives of the Partnership does not provide any mitigation of nor
defence for an alleged offence committed under current UK law.
Page 4 of 35
1. OVERVIEW
1. OVERVIEW
Key Function
The Greater Manchester Casualty Reduction Partnership (GMCRP) is a multiagency partnership committed to reducing the numbers of deaths and injuries on
Greater Manchesters roads by changing attitudes and behaviour. The
Partnerships aims and objectives are to support and assist Local Authorities,
Police and other agencies to reduce road casualties.
The Partnership includes the following organisations:
Bolton Council
Bury Council
Greater Manchester Fire and Rescue Service
Greater Manchester Primary Care Trust Cluster
Greater Manchester Police
Highways England
HM Court Services
Manchester City Council
Oldham Council
Rochdale Council
Salford City Council
Stockport Council
Tameside Council
The Crown Prosecution Service
Trafford Council
Transport for Greater Manchester
Wigan Council
Transport for Greater Manchester (TfGM) is the body responsible for transport
and travel matters across the county and the Joint Road Safety Group (JRSG) is
part of TfGM. The JRSG is the administrative arm of the GMCRP.
Governance
The current GMCRP came into being on 1 April 2011, replacing the former
Casualty Reduction Partnership which operated from April 2003 to March 2011
under the terms of the Department for Transport's national safety camera
programme. The Partnership is directed by nominated representatives of the
partnering organisations. The Partnership meets quarterly to guide and control
all aspects of the Partnerships strategy and operations.
Page 5 of 35
Funding
The Safety Camera Operation is funded by a proportion of the fees paid by
offenders attending one of the Greater Manchester National Driver Intervention
Courses. The Intervention Scheme was introduced to allow those offenders who
met the course criteria, the opportunity to participate in a nationally recognised
and supported training programme.
Principles and Responsibilities
There are 4 key principles:
All locations, both mobile and fixed, should be subject to regular reviews to
ensure the benefits of the cameras are still being achieved.
The protocols and procedures relating to the management of the safety camera
operation have been approved by the Greater Manchester Casualty Reduction
Partnership (GMCRP or Partnership) and are outlined within this document.
All arrangements will continue to take into account guidance from the
Department for Transport, the Association of Chief Police Officers, and all other
relevant authoritative sources.
Page 6 of 35
1. OVERVIEW
The Partnership will regularly review its practices and may make any changes
thought necessary to improve its operational and administrative effectiveness.
Any future changes to our protocols and working practices will be incorporated
into this handbook at the time of its review.
Type of Equipment Used
All enforcement equipment used by GMP for enforcement purposes are Home
Office Type Approved (HOTA). The camera operations are divided into two
distinct areas of work:
These types of camera have key features that make them suitable for their own
particular environment. All camera operations influence driver behaviour and as
such are an important factor in the drive towards lower road casualties.
Current Types of Fixed Camera
Fixed speed camera - locations where fixed speed camera housings are
installed with cameras operating continuously or from time to time. The
cameras are unattended and typically enforce road lengths where there has
been a concentrated cluster of injury collisions.
Average speed camera - locations where average speed (time over distance)
cameras are installed and in operation. This type of speed camera involves
two or more cameras measuring average camera-to-camera speed, based on
a calculation of the distance between the cameras and the time taken to
travel between these points.
Combined speed camera and red light camera traffic signal controlled
junctions where cameras detect red light offences and also speeding offences
when the lights are not on red. Enforcement takes place from the same
housing. These cameras are typically used to discourage drivers from
speeding into a junction in an attempt to avoid the red light phase, as well as
their primary use of recording instances of red light violation.
Red light camera - traffic signal controlled junctions where red light cameras
are installed and enforcement is undertaken. These cameras are used to take
Page 7 of 35
1. OVERVIEW
Page 8 of 35
1. OVERVIEW
images of vehicles passing through traffic lights when they are showing a red
signal. These cameras are only installed when a number of collisions confirm
that red light running is a key element in the collision.
General Principles
The Greater Manchester Casualty Reduction Partnership follows the selection
criteria given in DfT Circular 01/2007.
Location Categories
In Greater Manchester there are three main location categories:
Fixed
An established fixed safety camera location approved by the DfT prior to 1st April
2007 or approved by the GMCRP after this date.
Mobile
An established mobile safety camera location approved by the DfT prior to 1st
April 2007 or approved by the GMCRP after this date where:
There is an incidence KSIs and/or PICs, but do not quite meet the fixed
location selection criteria.
There is a degree of abuse of the speed limit which could contribute to
collisions.
Enforcement of the speed limit is believed to be appropriate and will help
bring the situation under greater control.
Community Concern
Subject to GMP resources, mobile enforcement can take place at locations where
requests have been received and where:
The location has been identified as a priority by GMPs assessment procedure.
(Not within the remit of this handbook).
There is an incidence of PICs and/or KSIs, but do not quite meet the full
selection criteria, and:
There is a degree of abuse of the speed limit which could contribute to a
collision problem, and:
There is concern on the part of the local community and/or the partner
agencies, and enforcement of the speed limit is believed to be appropriate and
will help bring the situation under greater control.
Page 9 of 35
The full installation cost of a new safety camera housing must be met by the Local
Authority; installation costs can vary and are dependent upon the type of camera
system proposed.
When considering the installation of a new safety camera the maintenance costs
will need to be taken into account. (See the Maintenance section for further
information).
Page 10 of 35
Fixed
speed camera buffers
1
Buffer or
route length
Mobile
1
km .
Routes
5km.
requirements
Number of
A minimum of 3 existing
killed and
serious
period*.
baseline period*.
baseline period*.
further requirements)
collisions
(KSI)
OR
OR
OR
below.
below.
collision per km
(average) in the baseline
period*. And meets the
*The baseline period is the most recent 36 month period available when proposal is submitted, where the end
date is within 12 months of the date of submission.
3
PIC total
value
Built up
Non-built up
Built up
Non-built up
Built up
Non-built up
22/km
18/km
11/km
9/km
8/km
6/km
10
required
Calculation of PIC total value:
- For buffers up to 1km the above value is required.
- For buffers longer that 1km the value is per km.
Average speed cameras are considered to be types of fixed camera and therefore must meet the rules for a new fixed camera.
Cost benefits should be considered taking account of the capital cost and ongoing revenue costs versus those of alternative fixed
or mobile enforcement.
2
The Partnership is not currently considering new routes.
3
Although average speed cameras are usually dealt with as fixed cameras their route length may obviously need to be longer than
1.5km.
Page 11 of 35
85
th
Mobile
1
Routes
Not applicable.
percentile
enforcement threshold in built-up areas and 5 mph over maximum speed limit in
speed at
non-built up areas. This can apply to all vehicles or a vehicle class but must be
proposed
compared consistently.
housings
5
Buffer
conditions
enforcement is easily
that are
safely.
safely.
suitable for
of route.
the type of
enforcement
proposed
6
Suitability of
buffer for
camera
enforcement
The speed limit has been reviewed confirming that camera enforcement is the right solution;
(b)
Analysis into the causes of the collisions has demonstrated that camera enforcement is the correct solution;
(c)
(d)
That the Speed Limit Order (where applicable) and signing are lawful and correct.
New camera buffers will be selected using an assessment that includes the level of fatal, serious and slight collisions. The combined
level of collisions will be expressed as a numerical scale (see below) and assessed relative to the road classification for the housing whether it is either a built up or non-built up area and according to the type of housing i.e. route, fixed, mobile or red light.
Page 12 of 35
Fixed
Request, suggestion or proposal from any source for new safety camera received by LA, JRSG or
others.
LA analyses collisions and speed data and checks against criteria. HFAS can analyse data on
request but a budget must be provided. LA must also check that the current SLO is correct,
appropriate and that there are no anomalies.
JRSG Report:
Not
recommended
for enforcement.
Yes
No
Requesting LA puts
forward to GMP to
be considered as a
Community Concern
location.
(copy request to
JRSG to prevent
duplication of
analysis).
Location is suitable, is
deemed to be a priority and
funding is available.
No further
action.
LA Action
JRSG Action
GMP Action
Implementation.
GMCRP Decision
Page 13 of 35
GMP currently operates Community Concern (CC) locations where limited speed
enforcement activity takes place. These locations are likely to be where the local
community are concerned about speeding and they do not meet the criteria for
fixed or mobile enforcement. CC enforcement should be triggered by a number
of independent requests from individual sources, petitions, or similar enquiries
received via local politicians.
Whilst CC locations are not required to meet the full criteria for fixed or mobile
locations, enforcement should still be intelligence led and collision and/or speed
data should highlight speed related factors.
CC locations are periodically reviewed by GMP to ensure that the list is
appropriately managed and includes locations with appropriate priority. It is for
this reason that locations may be removed following a review; however, this does
not prevent them from being considered again for inclusion should the requests
and evidence support further enforcement. As with other locations, no
enforcement can take place where there are discrepancies with signs or Speed
Limit Orders (SLOs).
The current assessment procedure by GMP for CC locations is given below:1. A complaint/ request is received via residents, internally or via a partner
agency.
2. The location is assessed by area Traffic Police Community Support Officer
(TPCSO) and a traffic survey is arranged.
3. Results of the traffic survey are examined using the weekly 85th percentile/
max speed/ min speed/ percentage of vehicles travelling over the speed limit
and enforcement threshold.
4. The location, including the nature of the local area, is considered including
potential risks to children, pedestrians or cyclists.
5. Collision data is reviewed, including the type of collision and casualty severity.
6. Depending upon the survey results; the nature of the location; and collision
history - points are allocated.
7. Locations will be put onto a list in order of priority based on the points
allocation.
8. Every three/ four months a review is undertaken & new locations are added
or removed from the list of current enforcement locations.
9. If a location is to be enforced the CC team will visit the road, photograph the
location, check conditions and signs etc., measure out distances and carry out
an enforcement risk assessment. All this information is then available to the
enforcement officers.
10. A schedule of enforcement is published to officers detailing specific dates and
times of enforcement. This ensures enforcement occurs at times where a
speed problem has been identified to cause significant risk to other road users.
Page 14 of 35
Terminal speed limit signing must be present, visible and maintained at all
times.
Responsibility
for erecting and maintaining road signs ultimately remains the
Statutory
Requirements
responsibility of the Highway Authority.
General guidance in relation to the visibility of signing can be found in
Chapter 3 of the Traffic Signs Manual.
Informatory Signs Warning on Approach to a Camera (Co-located, County
Boundary and redlight camera warning signs)
The provision of informatory signing on the approach to a safety camera has
never been a legal requirement; the provision of this type of signing is now a
matter of choice for the Local Authority.
Any decision to adopt natural lifespan in respect of informatory signage may have
to be explained should a court require.
Where reasonable and practicable all vehicles used for enforcement should be
conspicuously marked and clearly identified.
Visibility and Conspicuity
If enforcement is conducted from the outside and away from the enforcement
vehicle, the operator will ensure that he/she is clearly visible and wearing a high
visibility jacket.
Where reasonably practicable, speed camera housings, the camera operator or
the enforcement vehicle should be visible from the drivers viewpoint at the
following minimum visibility distances:
60 metres where the speed limit is 40 mph or less
100 metres at all other speed limits.
Before commencing mobile enforcement at a buffer the camera technician will
ensure that any statutory speed limit signing is correctly maintained and clear of
foliage or vegetation.
Page 15 of 35
All traffic signs must comply with the statutory requirements such as those set
Speed
Limit
Signing
out the
TSRGD
2002, and any subsequent and relevant amendments.
4. MAINTENANCE
General Principle
This principle outlines the general maintenance requirements applicable to the
safety cameras used and installed within Greater Manchester.
The safety cameras remain Local Authority assets, the majority of the
maintenance costs are funded by the Partnership, exceptions are shown in the
tables on pages 18 and 19.
The term safety camera includes all of the various types of cameras and
equipment used by the Partnership including fixed and mobile equipment, with
the exception of:
Variable message signs.
ANPR data collection cameras.
Watchman cameras.
Page 16 of 35
4. MAINTENANCE
Speed
Red light only
Red light and speed on green.
Average speed
The camera housing receives its power via a standard roadside feeder pillar.
Generally the feeder pillar has its own dedicated mains supply but in some
installations the power feed is fed from a street sign or a lighting column. It is
expected that all new locations will have a dedicated supply.
Maintenance Costs and Responsibilities
Maintenance can be divided into two sections:
Reactive maintenance - reactive maintenance includes repairs that cant be
anticipated e.g. Road Traffic Collision (RTC) damage, criminal damage.
Planned maintenance - planned maintenance is carried out during the routine
annual periodic inspections, the cost of which can be identified per housing
and included within a fixed rate maintenance contract.
Page 17 of 35
4. MAINTENANCE
Orders for new power supplies, connections and disconnections are a Local
Authority responsibility. At present camera power charges are both
administered and funded by the JRSG, this position is subject to review.
Fixed Housings
RedSpeed Housings:
The RedSpeed range of cameras includes the products of RedFusion, SpeedCurb
and RedSpeed.
RedSpeed cameras are relatively complex devices, the camera is a fixed and
permanent part of the housing, the housing differs from the standard pole used
extensively by Gatso, the RedSpeed pole and camera cabinet is a fixed integral
structure that is not routinely opened.
For the purposes of funding maintenance there is no distinction between a
RedSpeed housing and a RedSpeed digital camera, housing and camera are
treated as one unit.
RedSpeed sub-surface loops and sensors are all part of the camera detection
system. To satisfy the conditions of Home Office Type Approval (HOTA), all loop
cutting and replacement of defective sub-surface piezo detectors will be carried
out by RedSpeed technicians.
RedSpeed Equipment and Maintenance Responsibilities
Item(s)
Partner
Responsible
Roadside structure + integral camera, poles, cabinets, electrical control units, PSUs and wiring.
GMP
Repair/ replacement of sub-surface sensors and induction loops - including the loop cutting (L/A
may have to assist where foundations are found not to be suitable to support loops).
Partnership/
GMP
GMP
Faults and damage to underground power supply cables and connections to the feeder pillar
including chambers and ducting including replacing the feeder pillar.
Local Authority
Housing clearance at total loss installations and the cost of replacing total loss housing/camera all works will be subject to analysis, review and prioritisation.
Partnership
GMP
Maintenance of all white lining; including secondary check marks + stop lines; and signs & foliage.
Local Authority
GMP
Maintenance of all white lining; including secondary check marks, stop lines + signs and foliage
clearance.
Local Authority
Partnership
Local Authority
The funding for maintenance, excluding signs; lines and foliage, is currently provided by GMCRP and may
be subject to review.
Page 18 of 35
4. MAINTENANCE
Repairs, maintenance and annual calibrations are included within a SLA between
GMP and RedSpeed, the annual maintenance charge is divided between GMP and
the JRSG .
Damage to roadside structure poles/cabinets + electrical control units and wiring + where fitted
secondary flash pole and protective cowl - but not including the primary or secondary flash units.
Partnership
Repair/ replacement of sub-surface sensors and induction loops - including the loop cutting (L/A
may have to assist where foundations are found not to be suitable to support loops).
Partnership
Communications links, ADSL/3G routers and BT lines + aerial and cables + primary and secondary
lens and flash covers. Repairs to all removable parts; including camera, radar unit, control box,
associated cables and their annual calibration costs and flash units (both primary and secondary)
PSU and RLC interface units.
GMP
Faults and damage to underground power supply cables and connections to the feeder pillar
including chambers and ducting and replacing damaged feeder pillars.
Local Authority
Housing clearance at total loss installations and the cost of replacing a total loss housing (but not
the cost of a Gatso camera) - all works will subject to analysis, review and prioritisation.
Partnership
Damage to roadside feeder pillars, poles, cabinets/ electrical connections circuit boards and RCD
cut-outs.
Partnership
GMP
Maintenance of all white lining; including secondary check marks, stop lines + signs and foliage
clearance.
Local Authority
Partnership
The funding for maintenance, excluding signs; lines and foliage, is currently provided by GMCRP and will
be subject to review.
Page 19 of 35
4. MAINTENANCE
Item(s)
4. MAINTENANCE
Page 20 of 35
The table below gives examples of the type of work carried out near to a fixed
camera housing and an indication of the cost to rectify.
Signal Junction
Carriageway
Footway
Works
Location
Example of Type of
Work carried out
Possible impact on
Safety Camera
system
Potential remedial
work needed
Typical costs to
project or
maintenance
programme
Excavation /
reconstruction.
Re-connection of
cables Utility
company.
500 - 3k
Excavation /
reconstruction.
Damage to feeder
pillars.
300 - 1k
Excavation /
reconstruction.
Damage to BT ADLS
termination pegs or
chambers.
250 -750
Excavation /
reconstruction.
Damage ducting or
chambers.
New ducts or
chambers.
250 -1k
Carriageway
resurfacing, surface
skims, shell grip
style coverings,
kerb replacement.
1k - 12,000k
Resurfacing.
Speed detection
carriageway
secondary check
marks removed.
New secondary
check thermoplastic lines
required.
1k-1.5k
Installation of ASLs.
Sub-surface
detection loops are
no longer in the
correct position.
1k to 6k
Signal
modifications
including relocation
of signal heads,
alterations to lane
configuration and
and/or junction
remodelling.
Safety camera no
longer within the
approved position
relative to primary
signal head.
5k to 20k+
Page 21 of 35
4. MAINTENANCE
If a camera is in use and the loops or lines are damaged then any offences
recorded by the camera are lost.
On completion of a road scheme the housing/installation must be reinstated to
its original condition.
Damage to Camera Housings
Fixed roadside housings can attract unwanted attention; if damage is extensive or
the housing is a total loss then consideration may be given to its future.
Damage Procedure
Initial assessment is made by camera technician.
Minor repairs by camera technician.
Then, subject
adequate funding being available consideration will be
Housing
Repair to
Criteria
given to the camera housing being repaired or replaced using JRSG
maintenance funding.
Page 22 of 35
4. MAINTENANCE
These are given a high priority status; an engineer will attend and make the
housing safe. This may range from a disconnection from the mains electricity
to the clearance of unsafe equipment from the footpath or highway.
Once the housing is made safe, repairs can be assessed against the housing
repair criteria.
The above points do not prevent the Highway Authority from exercising their
own response.
Maintenance of the Buffer
Buffers can be enforced either by mobile or fixed equipment; to remain effective
these buffers rely on:
Permanently fixed statutory signs
Thermo-plastic white secondary check at fixed speed housings
Clear well maintained stop lines at fixed red-light housings
These signs and markings require routine maintenance; regular checks are carried
out by the camera technicians on the quality and visibility of the signing and
lining.
Page 23 of 35
4. MAINTENANCE
Emergency Callouts
GMP provide limited insurance cover to include theft and arson to the
cameras (not camera housings)
The camera housing falls outside of most insurance policies, no cover other
than that mentioned above is currently in place in respect of this equipment.
Housing unit 3rd party claims may be pursued by either the Local Authority or
the JRSG.
If a damaged camera housing has been the subject of a successful insurance
claim then any insurance payments should be used to support the cost of
reinstatement.
Page 24 of 35
4. MAINTENANCE
Insurance Cover
5. ENFORCEMENT
General Principles
The primary objective of safety camera deployment is to reduce the
number of killed and seriously injured persons on roads by reducing the
level and severity of speeding and red-light running.
This is done by preventing, detecting and enforcing speed and red-light
offences and encouraging a change in driver behaviour by the use of safety
camera activity.
The administration of the cameras and the initiating of any follow-up
procedures to deal with detections are dealt with by GMP personnel.
Safety Camera Operation
The responsibilities are:
Process
Camera Technicians detect and collect evidence of speeding and red light
offences. Offences are detected by actively managed mobile laser teams or a
variety of unattended fixed roadside safety cameras.
The CTO is responsible for several areas of work:
Viewing of offences All films and recorded material is viewed by trained and
experienced staff. Images and other data are assessed to determine whether
evidence exists to show that an offence has been committed.
The identification of offenders through a documented trail of notices.
The offence may then be dealt with by way of:
Driver Re-education scheme (where eligible)
Conditional Offer Fixed Penalty
Summons
The camera technicians and CTO prosecutions team are responsible for the
preparation of prosecution cases and presentation of evidence at court as
required.
Page 25 of 35
5. ENFORCEMENT
6. ENFORCEMENT PRIORITISATION
The Local Authority for the area where enforcement takes place are in full support of the
location being used for the purpose and in the manner described eg mobile enforcement
vehicle parked either fully or partially on the footpath.
Page 26 of 35
6. ENFORCEMENT PRIORITISATION
General Principles
Enforcement will be targeted at locations where there is evidence of injury
collisions.
Where data highlights speed is a contributory factor issue and there is
evidence of non-compliance to the posted speed limit.
All camera housings will be assessed on an annual basis to determine the
level of enforcement required.
The JRSG will undertake annual prioritisation of housings, the prioritisation list is
intended to inform and direct the enforcement strategy of the Safety Camera
Operation team within GMP.
Prioritisation of Buffers
A buffer is an area within which collisions, casualties and speeds can be
monitored and where camera enforcement can take place. Camera buffers will
be prioritised based on analysis of data by the JRSG and each buffer will be
ranked within three bands:
Red
Amber
Green
The prioritisation methodology has been developed by the JRSG along with GMP.
The methodology is primarily guided by the location selection criteria detailed
within the Operation, Policy & Procedure section.
The methodology may be reviewed and altered at any time subject to approval.
Page 27 of 35
6. ENFORCEMENT PRIORITISATION
Prioritisation Methodology
Medium Speeds
Low Speeds
RED
RED
AMBER
6 points
5 points
4 points
RED
AMBER
GREEN
5 points
4 points
3 points
AMBER
GREEN
GREEN
4 points
3 points
2 points
GREEN
GREEN
GREEN
3 points
2 points
1 point
High Collisions
Medium Collisions
Low Collisions
No Collisions
Speed Data
Points will be allocated to a buffer based on a range of mean4 interpeak5 (10:0015:00) speeds for each speed limit:
Speed Limit
Mean
Speed
85th %ile
Speed
Mean
Speed
85th %ile
Speed
Mean
Speed
85th %ile
Speed
30mph
>31
>35
26-31
30-35
<26
0-29
40mph
>41
>46
36-41
40-46
<36
0-39
50mph
>50
>57
44-50
50-57
<44
0-49
60mph
>60
>68
53-60
60-68
<53
0-59
70mph
>71
>79
62-71
70-79
<62
0-69
There is extensive research demonstrating the proven correlation between mean speed and accident frequency and severity, and
accident reduction. See DfT Circular 01/01 Setting Local Speed Limits which emphasises the use of mean speed for determining local
speed limits.
5
free-flowing traffic speed
Page 28 of 35
6. ENFORCEMENT PRIORITISATION
TrafficMaster data6 will be used for determining the speed in each buffer where
the Integrated Transport Network (ITN) link with the highest average speed for a
specified period will be used to represent conditions for the camera housing. In
some instances more than one link will be used e.g. where the link with the
highest speed during the day does not have the highest speed during the
overnight period.
Also, where the 85th percentile speed is much higher than the mean speed this is
indicative of speeding problems. Any location where the ratio between the mean
and 85th percentile speed is greater than 1.33 will be allocated a minimum of 2
points. I.e. cameras falling into the high speed housing category based on speed
will be allocated 3 points.
Collision Data
High
Collision Buffer
(3 points)
Medium
Collision Buffer
(2 points)
Low
Collision Buffer
(1 point)
No
Collisions
(0 points)
21+
5-20
1-4
TrafficMaster GPS is a database that holds data collected from in-vehicle GPS tracking devices. This information can be used to
derive measures of speed for analysis
7
The DfT guidance for number of collisions for new fixed location selection (Circular 01/2007 Use of Speed and Red-Light Cameras
for Traffic Enforcement: Guidance on Deployment, Visibility and Signing) is 3 KSI collisions per kilometre over 36 months
Page 29 of 35
6. ENFORCEMENT PRIORITISATION
Points will be allocated to a buffer based on collision data. For each buffer, 36
months of collisions will be analysed to establish a collision rate per km. KSI
collisions are allocated 5 points and slight collisions allocated 1 point7. The table
below outlines the proposed categorisation of buffers based on a range of total
points:
The ranking sheets will be given to GMP and be disseminated to all partners.
Additional data will also be included in the Camera Ranking sheets to aide
effective targeted enforcement:
85th percentile speed (10:00-15:00)
Overnight mean and 85%ile free flow speed (20:00-6:00)
24hr mean and 85th %ile free flow speed
Week mean and 85th %ile free flow speed (Mon-Fri)
Weekend mean and 85th %ile free flow speed (Sat/Sun)
6. ENFORCEMENT PRIORITISATION
Page 30 of 35
Page 31 of 35
Page 32 of 35
APPENDIX A
Page 33 of 35
APPENDIX A
Page 34 of 35
Page 35 of 35