Federal Register / Vol. 71, No.
131 / Monday, July 10, 2006 / Notices 38901
Advisory Council, which was
established to provide guidance to the
Secretary on long-term planning for
Great Sand Dunes National Park and
Preserve.
DATES: The meeting date is:
1. July 28, 2006, 9 a.m.–12 p.m.,
Mosca, Colorado.
ADDRESSES: The meeting location is:
1. Mosca, Colorado—Great Sand
Dunes National Park and Preserve
Visitor Center, 11999 Highway 150,
Mosca, CO 81146.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Steve Chaney, 719–378–6312.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: At the July
28 meeting, the National Park Service
will share a summary and discuss the
comments received during the review
period for the draft General
Management Plan, Wilderness Study
and EIS. A public comment period will
be held from 11:30 a.m. to 12 p.m.
Michael D. Snyder,
Regional Director.
[FR Doc. 06–6076 Filed 7–7–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–CL–M
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
Selma to Montgomery National Historic
Trail Advisory Council Notice of
Meeting
Notice is hereby given in accordance
with the Federal Advisory Committee
Act, Public Law 92–463, that a meeting
of the Selma to Montgomery National
Historic Trail Advisory Council will be
held Tuesday, July 18, 2006 at 9 a.m.
until 3:30 p.m., at the Lowndes County
Interpretive Center located at 7001
Highway 80 West, Hayneville, Alabama.
The Selma to Montgomery National
Historic Trail Advisory Council was
established pursuant to Public Law 100–
192 establishing the Selma to
Montgomery National Historic Trail.
This Council was established to advise
the National Park Service on such issues
as preservation of trail routes and
features, public use, standards for
posting and maintaining trail markers,
and administrative matters.
The matters to be discussed include:
(A) Welcome New Members.
(B) Update on Lowndes County IC.
(C) Update on other Interpretive Sites.
The meeting will be open to the
public. However, facilities and space
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
accommodating members of the public
are limited and persons will be
accommodated for first come, first serve
basis. Anyone may file a written
statement with Catherine F. Light, Trail
VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:10 Jul 07, 2006 Jkt 208001
Superintendent concerning the matters
to be discussed.
Persons wishing further information
concerning this meeting may contact
Catherine F. Light, Trail
Superintendent, Selma to Montgomery
National Historic Trail, at 334–727–
6390 (phone), 334–727–4597 (fax) or
mail 1212 Old Montgomery Road,
Tuskegee Institute, Alabama 36088.
Dated: June 21, 2006.
Shirley T. Streeter,
Administrative Officer, Selma to Montgomery
NHT.
[FR Doc. 06–6075 Filed 7–7–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–04–M
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
In the Matter of Certain Power Supply
Controllers and Products Containing
Same; Notice of Commission
Determination Not To Review a Final
Initial Determination of Violation of
Section 337; Schedule for Filing
Written Submissions on Remedy, the
Public Interest, and Bonding
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade
Commission
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined not to
review the Administrative Law Judge’s
(‘‘ALJ’’) final Initial Determination
(‘‘ID’’) finding a violation of section 337.
Notice is further given that the
Commission is requesting briefing on
remedy, public interest, and bonding
with respect to the respondent found in
violation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michelle Walters, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
708–5468. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov.
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at http://
www.usitc.gov/secretary/edis.htm.
Hearing-impaired persons are advised
that information on this matter can be
PO 00000 Frm 00060 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\10JYN1.SGM
obtained by contacting the
Commission’s ADD terminal on (202)
205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June
13, 2005, the Commission instituted this
investigation, based on a complaint filed
by Power Integrations, Inc. (‘‘PI’’) of San
Jose, California. The complaint, as
amended and supplemented, alleges
violations of section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930 (19 U.S. 1337) in the
importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, and the sale within
the United States after importation of
certain power supply controllers and
products containing the same by reason
of infringement of claims 1–3, 6, 9, and
17–19 of United States Patent No.
6,212,079; claims 1–3, 5, 6, 24, 28, and
29 of United States Patent No. 6,351,398
(‘‘the ‘398 patent’’; claims 8 and 12 of
United States Patent No. 6,366,481; and
claims 1, 4, 9–11, 12, 17, 19, 20, 22, 23,
26, 27, 30, 31, and 34 of United States
Patent No. 6,538,908 (‘‘the ‘908 patent’’).
During the investigation, the
Commission allowed PI to terminate the
investigation with regard to several
claims, leaving only claims 1, 3, 5, and
6 of the ‘398 patent and claims 26 and
27 of the ‘908 patent in this
investigation. The complaint named a
single respondent, System General
Corporation (‘‘SG’’).
On May 15, 2006, the ALJ issued a
final ID, including his recommended
determination on remedy and bonding.
In his ID, the ALJ found that SG’s
accused products infringe claims 1, 3, 5,
and 6 of the ‘398 patent and claims 26
and 27 of the ‘908 patent. Moreover, he
concluded that these claims are not
invalid for anticipation under 35 U.S.C.
102 and that the ‘398 patent and the
‘908 patent are not unenforceable due to
inequitable conduct. Finally, the ALJ
concluded that PI proved that there is a
domestic industry in the United States
with respect to both patents. As a result,
the ALJ recommended issuing a limited
exclusion order directed to infringing
power supply controllers produced by
SG, as well as certain downstream
products containing these controllers.
On May 26, 2006, respondent SG filed
a petition for review, challenging
various aspects of the ALL’s final ID. On
June 5, 2006, PI and the Commission
investigative attorney separately filed
responses to SG’s petition for review,
asserting that the ALJ properly
determined that there was a violation of
section 337 with regard to the asserted
claims.
Having examined the record of this
investigation, including the ALL’s final
ID, the petitions for review, and the
responses thereto, the Commission has
10JYN1