Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
CURSO/GRADO:
Octavo de Bsica
FECHA:
AO LECTIVO:
2015 - 2016
John Osborne
INSTRUCCIONES:
1. This diagnostic test has two parts:
1) Preparation (40 mins)
2) Action (40 mins)
2. The evaluation is of:
1) English reading, following instructions and writing some conclusions
2) Natural sciences the scientific process and conducting an investigation
3. This evaluation will help differentiate the teaching of the group, according to
individual abilities and levels
CLEVER WOODLICE!
Woodlice are common little grey creatures. They are found in large numbers
beneath rocks and stones or under piles of dead leaves and grass. Like all
animals and plants, they are adapted to their habitat and prefer to live in dark,
damp places, out of sight.
Woodlice are intelligent! Not only do they know how to choose dark, damp places, out of sight, they
seem to know what to do when they have to make choices in a simple maze.
Your tasks will be
PREPARATION
1. Build a simple T-choice maze, following instructions
2. Read the instructions for how to do the investigation
3. Decide a hypothesis, write it down and justify why you have decided on this hypothesis
ACTION
Using your simple T-choice maze, investigate how the woodlice behave, recording the results in the
results table.
1. Write down whether you support or reject your hypothesis, and write an explanation.
2. Write down three things which were not well done in your investigation and how you could
improve the investigation.
HYPOTHESIS
1. Complete this hypothesis statement:
2. Write why you have chosen this hypothesis. (Write one or two short sentences, justifying
your hypothesis.)
ACTION
Conduct the investigation with maybe 10 woodlice. If you have time for more, even better!
Record all your results in the RESULTS TABLE.
RESULTS TABLE
Trial#
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Second choice (L or R)
TOTALS
What was the total number of woodlice tested?
How many woodlice made the same second turn choice as their first choice?
Look back at your hypothesis and now write whether it is supported or rejected.
The hypothesis is (supported or rejected)
2. EVALUATION
a) Write down three aspects of your investigation which were not satisfactory things you did
not do well or properly
1)
2)
3)
b) Write down three ways in which you might improve the way in which the investigation could
be done. (Look at what you wrote previously and suggest an improvement.)
1)
2)
3)