Sunteți pe pagina 1din 2

Federal Register / Vol. 71, No.

117 / Monday, June 19, 2006 / Notices 35321

RECORD SOURCE CATEGORIES: 92007, Los Angeles, California, 90009– use and management of the navigable
Those individuals who submit initial 2007. Telephone: 310/725–3614. airspace and air traffic control systems,
requests and administrative appeals Documents reflecting this FAA action or adversely affecting other powers and
pursuant to FOIA and PA, the agency may be reviewed in the Office of the responsibilities of the Administrator
records obtained in the process of Airports Division, 15000 Aviation prescribed by law.
responding to such requests and Boulevard, Room 3012, Hawthorne, Specific limitations with respect to
appeals, and DOT personnel who California, 90261. FAA’s approval of an airport noise
handle such requests and appeals. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This compatibility program are delineated in
notice announces that the FAA has FAR Part 150, section 150.5. Approval
EXEMPTIONS CLAIMED FOR THE SYSTEM:
given its overall approval to the Noise is not a determination concerning the
During the course of a FOIA or PA acceptability of land uses under Federal,
action, exempt materials from other Compatibility Program for Scottsdale
Airport, effective May 30, 2006. Under State, or local law. Approval does not by
systems of records may in turn become itself constitute an FAA implementing
part of the case records in this system. section 104(a) of the Aviation Safety and
Noise Abatement Act of 1979, as action. A request for Federal action or
To the extent that copies of exempt approval to implement specific noise
records from those ‘other’ systems of amended (herein after referred to as the
‘‘Act’’) [recodified as 49 U.S.C. 47504], compatibility measures may be
records are entered into the FOIA/PA required, and an FAA decision on the
case file, the same exemptions apply for an airport operator who has previously
submitted a Noise Exposure Map may request may require an environmental
those records, as are claimed for the assessment of the proposed action.
original systems of records which they submit to the FAA a Noise
Approval does not constitute a
are a part. Compatibility Program which sets forth
commitment by the FAA to financially
the measures taken or proposed by the
Dated: June 13, 2006. assist in the implementation of the
airport operator for the reduction of
Kara Spooner, program nor a determination that all
existing non-compatible land uses and
Departmental Privacy Officer. measures covered by the program are
prevention of additional non-compatible
[FR Doc. E6–9580 Filed 6–16–06; 8:45 am] eligible for grant-in-aid funding from the
land uses within the area covered by the
FAA under the Airport and Airway
BILLING CODE 4910–9X–P Noise Exposure Maps. The Act requires
Improvement Act of 1982, as amended.
such programs to be developed in
Where federal funding is sought,
consultation with interested and requests for project grants must be
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION affected parties including local submitted to the FAA Airports Division
communities, government agencies, Office in Hawthorne, California.
Federal Aviation Administration
airport users, and FAA personnel. The City of Scottsdale submitted to
Approval of Noise Compatibility Each airport noise compatibility the FAA on October 13, 2004, the Noise
Program for Scottsdale Airport, program developed in accordance with Exposure Maps, descriptions, and other
Scottsdale, AZ Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) Part documentation produced during the
150 is a local program, not a Federal noise compatibility planning study
AGENCY: Federal Aviation program. The FAA does not substitute conducted from September 28, 1982
Administration, DOT. its judgment for that of the airport through October 13, 2004. The
ACTION: Notice. proprietor with respect to which Scottsdale Airport Noise Exposure Maps
measures should be recommended for were determined by FAA to be in
SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation
action. The FAA’s approval or compliance with applicable
Administration (FAA) announces its disapproval of FAR Part 150 program
findings on the noise compatibility requirements on January 21, 2005.
recommendations is measured Notice of this determination was
program submitted by the City of according to the standards expressed in
Scottsdale, Arizona under the published in the Federal Register on
Part 150 and the Act and is limited to February 7, 2005.
provisions of Title I of the Aviation the following determinations:
Safety and Noise Abatement Act, as The Scottsdale Airport study contains
a. The Noise Compatibility Program a proposed noise compatibility program
amended, (Public Law 96–193) was developed in accordance with the
(hereinafter referred to as ‘‘the Act’’) and comprised of actions designed for
provisions and procedures of FAR Part phased implementation by airport
14 CFR part 150. These findings are 150; management and adjacent jurisdictions
made in recognition of the description b. Program measures are reasonably from September 28, 1982 to beyond the
of Federal and nonfederal consistent with achieving the goals of year 2009). It was requested that the
responsibilities in Senate Report No. reducing existing non-compatible land FAA evaluate and approve this material
96–52 (1980). On January 21, 2005, the uses around the airport and preventing as a Noise Compatibility Program as
FAA determined that the noise exposure the introduction of additional non- described in 49 U.S.C. 47504 (formerly
maps submitted by the City of compatible land uses; Section 104(b) of the Act). The FAA
Scottsdale under Part 150 were in c. Program measures would not create began its review of the program on
compliance with applicable an undue burden on interstate or foreign October 13, 2004 and was required by
requirements. commerce, unjustly discriminate against a provision of the Act to approve or
DATES: Effective Date: The effective date types or classes of aeronautical uses, disapprove the program within 180 days
of the FAA’s approval of the Noise violate the terms of airport grant (other than the use of new or modified
Compatibility Program for Scottsdale agreements, or intrude into areas flight procedures for noise control).
Airport is May 30, 2006. preempted by the Federal Government; Failure to approve or disapprove such
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: and program within the 180-day period shall
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES

Michelle Simmons, Environmental d. Program measures relating to the be deemed to be an approval of such
Protection Specialist, Airports Division, use of flight procedures can be program.
Arizona Standards Section, AWP–623.4, implemented within the period covered The submitted program contained
Western-Pacific Region, Federal by the program without derogating thirty (30) proposed actions for noise
Aviation Administration, P.O. Box safety, adversely affecting the efficient abatement, land use planning and

VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:46 Jun 16, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00073 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\19JNN1.SGM 19JNN1
35322 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 117 / Monday, June 19, 2006 / Notices

program management on and off the contour, to a compatible land use. The Issued in Hawthorne, California on June 9,
airport. The FAA completed its review parcel is currently utilized as a golf 2006.
and determined that the procedural and course. The cities of Scottsdale and George E. Aiken,
substantive requirements of the Act and Phoenix should enact Project Review Acting Manager, Airports Division, Western-
FAR Part 150 have been satisfied. The Guidelines for those areas impacted by Pacific Region, AWP–600.
overall program was approved by the Airport operations; The cities of [FR Doc. 06–5515 Filed 6–16–06; 8:45 am]
Acting Associate Administrator for Scottsdale and Phoenix should adopt BILLING CODE 4910–13–M
Airports, effective May 30, 2006. the overlay zones contained within the
Outright approval was granted for proposed Project Review Guidelines; If
twenty-eight (28) of the thirty (30) the Project Review Guidelines and DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
specific program measures and (1) Overlay Zoning Alternatives are not Federal Highway Administration
program element was approved in part implemented, the City of Scottsdale
and disapproved in part. The approved should consider amending the [Docket No. FHWA 2006–25064]
measures included such items as: subdivision regulations to require the
Continued Informal Preferential Use of Agency Information Collection
issuance of navigation easements and
Runway 3; Continuation to encourage Activities: Request for Comments for
fair disclosure notices for the areas
Stage 2 Aircraft to use Runway 21 for New Information Collection
contained within the AC–1, AC–2, and
landings and Runway 3 for takeoffs;
AC–3 of the overlay zoning; The City of AGENCY: Federal Highway
Continuation to discourage right
Scottsdale should consider amending its Administration (FHWA), DOT.
downwind and right base pattern entry,
long straight-in approaches, and right current building codes to incorporate ACTION: Notice and request for
turn-outs prior to reaching the airport prescriptive noise standards; Should the comments.
boundary for aircraft using Runway 3; Project Review Guidelines alternatives
not be implemented, the City of SUMMARY: The FHWA invites public
Continuation to encourage right turns as comment about our intentions to request
soon as practical and discourage Scottsdale should consider
incorporating the 2009 noise contours the Office of Management and Budget
straight-out and left turns on departure (OMB) approval for a new information
from Runway 21. Continuation to into its general plan to allow for an
additional level of fair disclosure; The collection, which is summarized below
prohibit stop-and-go operations, under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. We
intersections take-offs, formations, and City of Phoenix should consider
are required to publish this notice in the
simulated single engine take-offs and rezoning the areas located north of the
Federal Register by the Paperwork
training go arounds by multi-engine Central Arizona Project (CAP) canal, Reduction Act of 1995.
aircraft on Runway 21; Continuation to which are currently zoned for
DATES: Please submit comments by
discourage descents below 2,500 feet residential land, uses and planned
mean sea level (MSL) for practice August 18, 2006.
industrial or commercial land uses;
instrument approaches; Continuation to Update Noise Exposure Maps and Noise ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
encourage National Business Aviation Compatibility Program; Monitor identified by DOT DMS Docket Number
Association (NBAA) standard or implementation of the updated Part 150 FHWA–2006–25064 to the Docket Clerk,
manufacturer’s comparable noise Noise Compatibility Program; Continue by any of the following methods:
abatement procedures; Continuation to • Web site: http://dms.dot.gov.
noise complaint tracking program;
prohibit touch-and-go operations Follow the instructions for submitting
Continue and expand airport signage
between 9:30 p.m. and 6 a.m.; comments on the DOT electronic docket
program; and Airport Pilot and site.
Continuation to prohibit maintenance Community Outreach Program.
run-up operations between 10 p.m. and • Fax: 1–202–493–2251.
Approval was not granted to three (3) • Mail: Docket Management Facility;
7 a.m.; Continuation to encourage use of
proposed program elements and one (1) U.S. Department of Transportation, 400
AOPA Noise Awareness Steps by light
program element was disapproved in Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building,
single-engine aircraft; Request Air
Traffic Control to coordinate on any part. The disapproved measures Room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590–
new approach, departure, or routing included such items as: Encourage the 0001.
procedures when ASR–11 radar use of published approach patterns for • Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on
installation is complete; Relocate the Runway 21; The City will encourage the plaza level of the Nassif Building,
existing run-up area from the approach FAA to chart visual flight procedures to 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington,
end of Runway 21 to the proposed site provide pilots with minimum safe flying DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
in the central portion of the airport; altitudes and paths on approach; and through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Inform transient helicopter pilots of the Construction of a run-up enclosure. Docket: For access to the docket to
noise abatement flights paths; Change These determinations are set forth in read background documents or
Phoenix Sectional Aeronautical Chart to detail in the Record of Approval signed comments received go to http://
depict additional populated places; by the Acting Associate Administrator dms.dot.gov at any time or to Room 401
Within their respective General Plans, for Airports, May 30, 2006. The Record on the plaza level of the Nassif Building,
the cities of Scottsdale and Phoenix of Approval, as well as other evaluation 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington,
should maintain the compatibility materials and the documents DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
planned areas within the 55 DNL comprising the submittal, are available through Friday, except Federal holidays.
contour; The cities of Scottsdale and for review at the FAA office listed above FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Phoenix should maintain the and at the administrative offices of the Chien-Tan Chang, Office of Bridge
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES

compatibly-zoned areas within the City of Scottsdale. The Record of Technology, HIBT–1, (202) 366–6749,
project study area; The City of Approval also will be available on-line Fax (202) 366–3077, or e-mail chien-
Scottsdale should consider rezoning the at: http://www.faa.gov/arp/ tan.chang@dot.gov. For legal questions,
parcel located directly north of the environmental/14cfr150/index14.cfm. please contact Mr. Robert Black, Office
airport, within the 65 DNL noise of the Chief Counsel, (202) 366–1359,

VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:46 Jun 16, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00074 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\19JNN1.SGM 19JNN1

S-ar putea să vă placă și