2015 Pcola GS-1332

STATE OF FLORIDA
COMMISSIONERS:
ART GRAHAM, CHAIRMAN

RONALD A. BRJSE
DNISION OF ENGINEERING
TOM BALLINGER
DIRECfOR
(850) 413-6910
LISA POLAK EOGAR

JULIE I. BROWN
JIMMYPATRONIS
1Efuhlic~.er&ir.e Qlommizzion
August 19, 2015
Mr. Eric Olson, City Administrator

Pensacola Energy
222 West Main Street
Pensacola, FL 32502
Re: Annual Natural Gas Pipeline Safety Evaluation- 2015.:.... GS-1332-PCOLA- Pensacola
Energy
Dear Mr. Olson:
Mr. Robert Simpson, Mr. Farhan Alnajar and Mr. Hassan Badran, Engineering Specialists,
completed an evaluation of the physical facilities and records of Pensacola Energy's gas system
on August 14, 2015. The evaluation consisted of review and verification of related documents,
field tests, and interviews with employees. The pipeline safety evaluation identified five
violations:
1. Chapter 25-12.045(), FAC- Inactive Gas Service Lines.
2. Chapter 25-12.045(e), FAC- Inactive Gas Service Lines.
3. Chapter 25-12.040(2)(b), FAC- Leak Surveys, Procedures and Classification.
4. Section 192.707(d)(2), CFR- Line Markers for Mains and Transmission Lines.
5. Section 192.463, CFR,- External Corrosion Control: Cathodic Protection.
This notification of a gas pipeline safety violation GS-1332- PCOLA is for failure to comply
with State and Federal natural gas safety rules. Your written response to the violation notice is
required by September 18, 2014. Response to this notice is to address the corrective measures, and the
proposed actions to prevent any recurrences. Failure to take corrective action may result in a penalty
as provided in 368.061, FS Please address the reply to my attention.
CAPITAL CmCLE OFFICE CENTER 2540 SHUMARD OAK BOULEYARD TALLAHASSEE, FL 32399-0850
An Affirmative Action I Equal Opportunity Employer
PSC Website: http://www.floridapsc.com
Internet E-mail: contact@psc.state.fl.us
Mr. Eric Olson
August 19, 2015
Page Two
Operational personnel have been informed of the fmdings regarding the safety evaluation.
Please find enclosed Mr. Simpson's evaluation report with additional information and attachments. If
there are any questions regarding this evaluation and report, you may contact Mr. Simpson at
850.413 .7001 or me at 850.413.6582.
Sincerely,
Rick Moses
Chief, Bureau of Safety
RM:mj
Enclosures
cc: Tom Ballinger, Division Director

Robert Simpson, Engineering Specialist
Farhan Alnajar, Engineering Specialist
Hassan Badran, Engineering Specialist
State of Florida
Jluhlir~erftitt
cttnnttttilminn
CAPITAL CIRCLE OFFICE CENTER 2540 SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD

TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-0850
-M-E-M-0-R-A-N-D-U-MDATE:
August 19,2015
TO:
Rick Moses, Chief of Safety, Bureau of Safety, Division of Engineering
FROM:
Robert Simpson, Engineering Specialist III
RE:
Annual Pipeline Safety Evaluation: Pensacola Energy
ISSUE
Whether Pensacola Energy, the operator, is operating and maintaining the natural gas system in
accordance with the compliance requirements of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part
192 and the Rules of the Florida Public Service Commission (FPSC) Chapter 25-12, Florida
Administrative Code (F.A.C.) or is there a need for agency action?
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that agency action be issued to Pensacola Energy for the following :
1. The operator failed to physically abandon and retire service lines after ten years of
inactivity, as required in FPSC Chapter 25-12.045() Inactive Gas Service Lines, F.A.C.;
2. The operator failed to physically abandon and retire bare steel service lines after five
years of inactivity as required in FPSC Chapter 25-12.045(e) Inactive Gas Service Lines,
F.A.C.;
3. The operator failed to repair Grade 2 leaks within 90 days from the date the leak was
originally located, as required in FPSC Chapter 25-12.040(2)(b) Leaks Surveys,
Procedures and Classification, F.A.C.;
4. The operator failed to use a correct telephone number for line markers for cathodic
protection test points as required in CFR Part 192 Section 192.707(d)(2) Line markers for
mains and transmission lines;
5. The operator failed to maintain an acceptable level of cathodic protection, as per the CFR
Part 192 Section 192.463 External corrosion control: Cathodic Protection.
The details of the findings are presented in the discussion portion of this report.
August 19,2015
MEMORANDUM
DISCUSSION
A pipeline evaluation of the facilities and records of the gas distribution system of the City of
Pensacola was conducted from August' 3 through 14, 2015. The evaluation consisted of
commission checklists GS-04-Corrosion Survey, GS-05-Pressure Regulation, GS-060dorization, GS-13-Summary and GS-14-Valve Survey. Other checklists used were Pipeline
and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) Form 13-Pipeline Drug & Alcohol
Questions, PHMSA Form 14-0perator Qualification Headquarters, PHMSA Form IS-Operator
Qualification Field, PHMSA Form 21-Public Awareness Plan, and PHMSA Form 24Distribution Integrity Management Program (DIMP). The evaluation consisted of a review of
maintenance records including operator qualification plan and records, leak survey, cathodic
protection, valve maintenance, odorization, and regulator station. The field evaluation consisted
of odorization, valve survey, cathodic protection, and regulator station inspection. Five violations
were detected during the evaluation, details of which are presented below.
Inactive Service Lines
A review of the 2014 records show that the system has 14 78 inactive service lines that are more
than 10 years old, but the operator failed to retire and physically abandon the service lines as
required in FPSC Chapter 25-12.045() - Inactive Gas Service Lines. In addition, the operator
also failed to physically abandon and retire 5719 bare steel service lines after five years of
inactivity as required in FPSC Chapter 25-12.045(e)- Inactive Gas Service Lines, F.A.C.
Leak Repair
It was noted, during a review of the 2014 records, that repairs for five grade 2 leaks were
performed after 90 days contrary to the rule requirement; therefore, the operator failed to repair
the Grade 2 leaks within 90 days from the date the leak was originally located, as required in
FPSC Chapter 25-12.040(2)(b) - Leaks Surveys, Procedures and Classification, F.A.C. This
report includes attachments showing the leak repair violation.
Line Markers for Cathodic Protection Test Points
During the field evaluation for cathodic protection, it was noted that telephone numbers on line
markers for emergency situations had incorrect area codes, rendering the number nonresponsive.
There were at least three locations: Gunter Road & Hollyhill Road, Goya Drive & Rothchild
Drive, and 5025 Bankhead Drive, with incorrect area codes. CFR Part 192 Section 192.707(d)(2)
states that "the name of the operator and the telephone number (including area code) where the
operator can be reached at all times" be shown on the line markers. This report includes images
of the line marker with their nonresponsive telephone number.
Cathodic Protection
A review of the cathodic protection records indicated that 14 readings for test stations were
either unsatisfactory or not read at all. Further, during the field evaluation for galvanic anodes, it
was noted that there were four readings that were either unsatisfactory or the operator's inability
August 19,2015
MEMORANDUM
to make reads because the test station could not be located. This report includes attachments
showing some of the readings. The operator needs to immediately address all issues surrounding
the cathodic protection system as required in CFR Part 192 Section 192.463 External corrosion
control: Cathodic Protection.
CONCLUSION
The annual pipeline gas safety evaluation of the City of Pensacola found five violations for
which immediate action is required. The violations were discussed with Mr. Don Suarez,
Director-Pensacola Energy, Mr. Darryl Singleton-Gas Operations Superintendent, Ms. Bonnie
Hoffman-Regulatory & Compliance Manager, and Ms. Dena Faessel-Administrator of
Operations, to assure system compliance with state and federal requirements.
RS Attachments
FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

PIPELINE SAFETY EVALUATION SUMMARY
GAS SYSTEM: Pensacola, Energy Services of
EVALUATION COMPLETED DATE: 8/14/2015
ADDRESS: 1625 Atwood Drive
EVALUATED BY: Robert Simpson, Hassan Badran, Farhan Alnajar
CITY: Pensacola, FL 32514
LIAISON CONTACTED: Don Suarez

FUNCTION
FORMS
ADEQUACY
DATE
GS-03
Operations & Maintenance
GS-04
Corrosion Survey
GS-05
Pressure Regulation
./
8/12/15
GS-06
Odorization
./
8/11/15
GS-08
Leakage Survey
GS-14
Valve Survey
./
8/12/15
Drug and Alcohol Program
./
8/14/15
Operator Qualifications Headquarters
./
8/13/15
PHMSA Form 15
Operator Qualifications Field
./
8/13/15
PHMSA Form 21
Public Awareness
./
8/13/15
PHMSA Form 24
Distribution Integrity Management Plan

Implementation
./
8/13/15
Annual Report
./
8/3/15
PHMSA Form 13
PHMSA Form 14
PHMSA Form 7100

RECORDS REVIEW
CHECK
v'
Atmospheric Corrosion
Corrosion Surveys
8/7/15
NC
DATES
Miles of main
8/5/15
8/5/15
NC-evaluated in 2014
or services
1606
Steel
639
Plastic
882
Other
85
57877
Steel
17237
Plastic
40640
Other
#Inactive service lines overS ~ yrs.

(bare steel or cast iron)
# Inactive service lines over 10 ~ years
(any material)
#Inactive Service Lines
5719
Damage Prevention
v'
8/13/15
Emergency Equipment Up To Date
v'
8/13/15
Emergency Plan Up To Date
v'
8/4/15
Emergency Contacts Current
v'
8/4/15
Employee Training
v'
8/5/15
Isolation Valves
v'
8/5/15
Total #Inactive
11 ,654
service lines
Miles of steel main without
cathodic protection (CP)
Total corrosion leaks on steel
mains without CP
Number of metallic services
without CP
Total corrosion leaks on metallic
services without CP
Number o( corrosion leaks on
mains & services with CP
8/5/15
#Leaks without CP that have not had remedial corrosion control
8/5/15
#Leaks with CP that have not had remedial corrosion control
Leak Repair
Member One-Call
v'
1478
439
82
16040
141
223
II
Correction
plan
Odorization
v'
Operator Qualification Plan
v'
8/3/15
Total of leaks on plastic pipeline from brittle-like

cracking
Operator Qualifi~ation Records
v'
8/3/15
Miles bare steel pipe
351
Replacement plan
YES
Finish date
Unknown
Patrolling Of Pipelines
v'
8/13/15
Miles cast iron pipe
85
Replacement plan
NO
Finish date
NA
Joints
8/13/15
Miles plastic pipeline without means of location
#Cast iron
Pipe
leaks
Unaccounted-for gas current
year
v'
8/13/15
Plastic Joiner Qualifications
v'
8/5/15
Pressure Testing Of Facilities
v'
8/13/15
Current annual PHMSA F 7100 reviewed for accuracy
Public Awareness
v'
8/13/15
Leak instrument surveys: business districts
Regulator Capacity Checked
v'
8/12/15
Public congregation
Regulator Pressure Control
v'
8/12/15
Survey areas reviewed and survey classifications updated
Standards, Rules, Regulations
v'
8/5/15
System Maps
v'
8/5/15
Vault Inspections
NA
4.5 to
100%
Bare metallic
v'
8/5/15
Welding Procedures
v'
8/13/15
Graphitization
Calculation checked
0
NO
YES
100 .to
Master meters
NA
Residential
33 ;.
!Instruments Calibrated
VES
33 ;.
VES
Drug test# employees
79
#of tests
35
# of failures
Alcohol test# employees
79
#of tests
35
II of failures
Drug and alcohol testing labs on the DHHS approved list
Welder Qualifications
PSC OS Il SUM MARY
NA
NA
Plastic Procedures
Finish date
NA
YES
Supervisors Trained
~y~
SIGNATURE OF EVALUATING ENGINEER
YES
CORROSION CONTROL SURVEY

SYSTEM SURVEYED: Pensacola Energy
DATE SURVEYED: 8/7/15
SURVEY BY: Robert Simpson, Hassan Bad.ran, Farhan Alnajar
Readings in mV
ADDRESS
On
Off
1.
Evelyn's Ln. & Cerny Rd. (TS 2)
-1375
-930
2.
Cerny Rd. & Muldoon Rd. (TS 4)
-1459
-1047
3.
Laceida Dr. & Muldoon Rd. (TS 5)
-2238
-1006
4.
Lenora St. & Donley St. (TS 26)
-2195
-1114
5.
Hwy 29 Crossing Eastside at ventpipe
-1025
-996
6.
9908 Cove A venue
-1434
-1242
7.
3763 Ashland Avenue
-1215
-1180
8.
9919 Stirrup Drive
-967
-850
9.
9832 Heather Drive
-1240
-726
10
Navy Blvd. & Druid Drive
-1116
-990
11
411 Creary Street
-1124
-1040
12
610 S. Navy Blvd.
-1102
-1054
13
3 700 Market Street
-1820
-1767
14
Market St. & Massachussetts Ave.
-1028
-927
15
817 Beverly Pkwy
-1140
-1113
16
6637 Hampton Road
-1050
-969
17
1861 Lepley
-1422
-1285
18
I-10 Crossing North Side
-1362
-1029
19.
1999 Detroit Blvd.
-1479
-1210
20.
Surrey Dr. & Nine Mile Road
-1075
-969
Form GS-04 Corrosion Survey
1.
Rectifier Readings
Hayward Street: 12.64 Volts; 1.05 Amps
2.
Edgewater Dr. "Bayou Crossing": 16.55 Volts; 3.3 Amps
3.
Navy Blvd at Bayou Chico: 30.39 Volts; 0.64 Amps
4.
8 Mile Creek Road: 40.16 Volts; 2.4 Amps
5.
Bowman Road: 25.04 Volts; 6.5 Amps
6.
10 Mile Rd. & Pate Street 2.27 Volts
7.
Saufley Field Road: 19.6 Volts; 0.1 Amps
8.
Market Street: 20.83 Volts; 9.4 Amps
9.
New Warrington Road: 31.88 Volts; 6 amps

Galvanic Anodes
Comment
??
1.
Chisholm Rd. & Johnson Ave.
Gift Drive & Johnson Ave.
-925
JoJo Rd. & Chisholm Road
-860
Westside Dr. & Rivers Rd.
-1037
Old Palafax Hwy & 10 mi Rd.
-957
Germain St. & Durand Ave. TP 12)
-1092
8 mi Creek & Wild Lake .....
-1002
66 ' W of 8 mile Creek Rd.
-741
9
10
950' E. ofE P/L of University Pkwy TS 6

(1 0065 Hillview Dr.)
600' E.E. P/L ofKawanee Dr. TS 3
-1020
11
Gunter Rd. & Hollyhill Rd (B3)
-1228
12
Goya Dr. & Rothchild Dr.
-950
13
5025 Bankhead Dr. (B-4)
-731
Form GS-04 Corrosion Survey
??
No wire for reading
Old emergency no.

(904-474-5300)
Test point not found
Old emergency no.

(904-474-5300)
Old emergency no.
(904-474-5300)
Old emergency no
(904-474-5300)

GAS PRESSURE CONTROL AND OVER-PRESSURE PROTECTION EVALUATION
CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS, PART 192
COMMISSION RULES CHAPTER 25-12
GAS SYSTEM: Pensacola Energy
EVALUATED BY: Robert Simpson, Farhan Alnajar,

Hassan Badran
DATE: 8/12/15
LIAISON: Don Suarez
This is a guide only any question should be checked against the rule or regulation cited.
0 - Satisfactory
[8]-
Requirement Unsatisfactory Compliance
NA - Requirement does not apply
PRESSURE CONTROL LOCATION OR IDENTIFICATION:
NC - Not checked at this time
F Street
192.199: REQUIREMENTS FOR DESIGN OF PRESSURE CONTROL
Pressure controlling devices are designed and installed to:

1.
Not be impaired by corrosion.
./
2.
Not to make the device inoperative because of valves and valve seats design.
./
3.
Be tested for leakage in the closed position.
./
4.
Be tested for the pressure at which it will operate.
./
5.
Be operated to determine ifthe valve is free .
./
6.
Not have combustible supports.
./
7.
Have discharge stacks, vents or outlet ports designed to prevent accumulation of water.
./
8.
Discharge gas into the atmosphere without hazard.
./
9.
Be adequate to prevent hammering of the valve or to impair relief capacity.
./
10.
Prevent any single incident from affecting the operation of both the overpressure protective device
and a district regulator when installed at a district regulator station to protect a pipeline system from
over-pressuring.
./
11.
Prevent unauthorized operation of any stop valve that will make the pressure relief valve or limiting
device inoperative. (Except for a valve that will isolate the system under protection from its source of
pressure.)
./
GS-05 Pressure Regulation
192.201: REQUIRED CAPACITY OF PRESSURE RELIEVING AND LIMITING STATIONS

Pressure relief and limiting stations have the capacity at required set pressure to prevent:
I.
Low-pressure distribution systems prevented from receiving gas pressure that could cause the unsafe
operation of any connected and adjusted utilization equipment.
./
2.
Pressure limiting devices must be installed near each regulator station in a low-pressure distribution
system.
./
3.
Must have the capacity to limit the maximum pressure in the main so that it will not exceed the safe
operating pressure for any utilization equipment.
./
4.
Systems operating at 60 psig or greater from exceeding the lower of either: the maximum pressure
plus 10% or a pressure that produces a hoop stress of75% SMYS.
NA
5.
Systems operating at 12 psig or greater and less than 60 psig from exceeding MAOP + 6 psig.
NA
6.
Systems operating at less than 12 psig from exceeding MAOP plus 50%.
./
19~.203
REQUIREMENTS: INSTRUMENT CONTROL, SAMPLING PIPE AND COMPONENTS
The design and installation of instruments, controls, sampling pipes and components comply with the following:
I.
Takeoff connections and fittings, or adapters are made of suitable materials, able to withstand the
maximum service pressure and temperature of the pipe or equipment to which it is attached, to
withstand all stress without failure by fatigue.
./
2.
Shutoff valves installed in each takeoff line as near as practicable to the point of takeoff. (Control
lines.) Except lines that can be isolated by other valving.
./
3.
Blow-down valves installed where necessary.
./
4.
Drains and drips in which liquids can accumulate are protected from damage by freezing.
NA
5.
Connections for cleaning if subject to clogging.
NA
6.
Pipes, components, and supports arranged to provide safety for anticipated operating stresses.
./
7.
Joining method used must be suitable for anticipated pressures and temperatures with sufficient
flexibility provided within the system for expansion. Slip type expansion joints are not used.
./
8.
Control lines to regulator and over-pressure protective device installed to prevent damage to any one
line from making both inoperative and must be protected from anticipated causes of damage.
./
FPSC
192.741: TELEMETERING AND RECORDING GAUGES

1.
Each system supplied by more than one pressure control station is equipped with telemetering or
recording pressure gages to indicate the gas pressure in the district.
../
2.
Determine the necessity of installing telemetering or recording gauges on distribution systems

supplied by a single district pressure regulating station.
../
3.
When there are indications of abnormal pressure conditions the equipment is inspected and any
unsatisfactory conditions are corrected promptly.
../
192.53/192.103: MATERIALS FOR PIPE AND COMPONENTS

I.
All pipe, valves, fittings, flanges and other components are of the appropriate pressure rating and
standard.
2.
When the manufacturer or appropriate standard requires special gaskets and alloy bolts or studs and
nuts used.
../
../
192.241/192.273: INSPECTION OF JOINTS
I ../
All joints pass a visual inspection for compliance.
192.605: OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN

I.
Operation and maintenance plan comprehensively covers pressure control and over-pressure
protection.
./
2.
Operation and maintenance plan available to personnel responsible for pressure control and overpressure protection.
../
192.707(c): LINE MARKERS

Line markers must be placed and maintained along each section of a main and transmission line that is
located above ground in an area accessible to the public.
../
FPSC
25-12.050(2): FACILITY IDENTIFICATION

Gas regulating station permanently marked by metal signs, line markers, plastic decals, or other appropriate
means to identify the operator's name and phone number.
./
192.481: ATMOSPHERIC CORROSION CONTROL: MONITORING

Pipeline exposed to the atmosphere is free from evidence of atmospheric corrosion. Particular attention is
placed on pipe at soil-to-air interfaces, under thermal insulation, under disbanded coatings, at pipe supports,
in splash zones, at deck penetrations and in SQans over water.
./
25-12.022(1): REQUIREMENT FOR DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM VALVES

Valve is installed upstream of each regulator station for use in an emergency to stop the flow of gas. These
valves are to be installed at a safe distance from the station, but no more than 500 feet from the regulator
station.
./
192.183: VAULTS- STRUCTURAL DESIGN

Vaults housing pipeline facilities must be designed to withstand loads that can be imposed, and to
protect installed equipment.
NA
2.
Sufficient space must be provided around facilities to allow necessary operation and maintenance of
equipment.
NA
3.
Pipelines entering or in vault must be steel for sizes 10 inches or less, except for any copper control
and gauge piping.
NA
4.
Piping extending through the vault must be arranged to prevent gases or liquids from passing
through the vault opening around the pipe, and to avert strains in the pipe.
NA
I.
192.749: VAULTS
I.
Vaults greater than 200 cu. ft. and housing pressure regulating and/or limiting devices are inspected
to assure good physical condition and adequate ventilation every fifteen (15) months or at least once
every calendar year. Where gas is found, the source is determined and repaired; ventilation
equipment is inspected to assure proper function.
2.
Vault structure is examined to assure that it is sound and does not bear on the pipeline facilities and
cover is in place and is not a public hazard
NA
NA
FPSC

3.
Pipeline facilities in the vault are adequately protected from external corrosion.
192.185: Vaults- Accessibility

Vault locations, in as far as practical, will be away from street intersections, points of heavy traffic, surface
water courses, points of minimum elevation, underground utilities and other facilities.
NA
192.187: Vaults- Sealing, Venting and Ventilation

Vaults and pits with an internal volume exceeding 200 sq. ft. and containing pressure limiting, regulating or relieving
equipment must have:
1.
Ventilation with two ducts, each with the ventilating effect of 4-inch diameter pipe.
NA
2.
Enough ventilation capacity to minimize formation of combustible atmosphere.
NA
3.
Ducts of sufficient height to disperse gases safely. (Above pedestrian height if practicable - 7 feet.)
NA
Vaults and pits with internal volume greater than 75 cu. ft. but less than 200 cu. feet must have:
1.
If sealed, tight fitting covers without opening and provision for testing atmosphere in vault or pit without
removing cover.
NA
2.
If vented, means to prevent sources of external ignition from reaching vault atmosphere, or
NA
If ventilated, design according to requirements for vaults of200 cu. ft. or more internal volume
or ratio of internal volume to effective ventilating areaprovided in cover of at least 20 to 1.
NA
192.189: Vaults- Drainage and Waterproofing

1.
Vaults must be designed so to minimize entrance of water.
NA
2.
Vaults with gas carrying facilities designed to ensure that they are not interconnected to other
underground structures by drains.
NA
3.
All electrical equipment in gas vaults must conform to the applicable National Electrical Code with
Class I, Group D requirements of ANSIINFPA 70. (Must have standard available if referenced.)
NA
FPSC
GENERAL PRESSURE CONTROL STATION DATA
Maximum Possible Pressure of Inlet Gas.

RUN
1.
SIZE
2"
MAKE&MODEL
FisherEZR
SIZE
ORIFICE
100%
OUTLET
PRESSURE
7.1 "
2.
we
psig
INLET
PRESSURE
56 psig
psig
56
OUTLET
CAPACITY
175 MCFH
psig
MCFH
3.
4.
5.
RELIEF/MONITOR
1.
12"
we
112
2.
SCFM
MCFH
3.
4.
192.201: REQUIRED CAPACITY

Distribution systems supplied from more than one gas source (compressor station, gate station, etc.) must have pressure
relief or limiting devices installed at each station with sufficient capacity to insure that failure of the largest capacity
regulator, compressor or any single run of Jesser capacity units will not impose pressures more than those for which it
was designed or protected against.
./
1.
MAOP of system downstream will/can not be exceeded.
2.
Device set to operate at:
12"
we
3.
Device operates at:
12"
we
4.
Provides protection for largest possible failure at:
12"
we
FPSC
192.739/192.743: PRESSURE CONTROL INSPECTION AND TESTING

I.
Pressure limiting or control station inspected and tested at intervals not exceeding
15 months, and not over one calendar year.
2.
If relief test is not feasible required capacity review is done, at intervals not exceeding 15 months, and not over
one calendar year. Calculated to be NA
MCFHat
psi g.
3.
Set to function at the correct pressure so as not to exceed the MAOP, plus allowances.
4.
Properly installed and protected from dirt, liquids or other conditions that might prevent proper
operation.
Oates of last two tests.

12/11/13, 11/4/14
25-12.060: REQUIRED RECORDS

Records of the pressure regulating station equipment and test performed are adequately maintained and cover as a
mmtmum:
1.
Identification of each device.
2.
The device location.
3.
Work performed and date.
4.
Mechanical condition.
5.
Adequate capacity.
./
./
./
./
./
SCHEMATIC OF STATION IF NEEDED
File: GS-05-PressureRegulation-1 0_ 07 .doc

FPSC

EVALUATED BY: Robert Simpson, Hassan Badran,

Farhan Alnajar
DATE: 8/12/15
LIAISON: Don Suarez
0 - Satisfactory
181- Requirement Unsatisfactory Compliance
Gate #1
192.199: REQUIREMENTS FOR DESIGN OF PRESSURE CONTROL

l.
./
2.
./
3.
NA
4.
./
5.
Be operated to determine if the valve is free.
./
6.
./
7.
NA
8.
NA
9.
NA
10.
over-pressuring.
./
11.
pressure.)
./
OS-05 Pressure Regulation

1.
NA
2.
system.
NA
3.
./
4.
NA
5.
./
6.
Systems operating at Jess than 12 psig from exceeding MAOP plus 50%.
NA
192.203 REQUIREMENTS: INSTRUMENT CONTROL, SAMPLING PIPE AND COMPONENTS

1.
withstand all stress without failure by fatigue .
./
2.
./
3.
./
4.
./
5.
./
6.
./
7.
./
8.
./
FPSC

1.
./
2.

./
3.
./

1.
All pipe, valves, fittings, flanges and other components are of the appropriate pressure rating and
standard.
2.
nuts used.
./
./
192.241/192.273: INSPECTION OF JOINTS
I ./

1.
protection.
./
2.
./

./
FPSC

means to identifY the operator's name and phone number.
./

in splash zones, at deck penetrations and in spans over water.
./

station.
./

1.
NA
2.
equipment.
NA
3.
Pipelines entering or in vault must be steel for sizes 10 inches or less, except for any copper control
and gauge piping.
NA
4.
NA
192.749: VAULTS
1.
every calendar year. Where gas is found , the source is determined and repaired; ventilation
2.
NA
NA
FPSC

3.

NA

I.
NA
2.
NA
3.
Ducts of sufficient height to disperse gases safely. (Above pedestrian height if practicable - 7 feet.)
NA
Vaults and pits with internal volume greater than 75 cu. ft. but Jess than 200 cu. feet must have:
I.
removing cover.
NA
2.
NA
or ratio of internal volume to effective ventilating area provided in cover of at least 20 to 1.
NA

I.
NA
2.
NA
3.
NA
FPSC
Maximum Possible Pressure oflnlet Gas.

RUN
SIZE
MAKE&MODEL
SIZE
ORIFICE
OUTLET
PRESSURE
INLET
PRESSURE
198 psig
OUTLET
CAPACITY
1.
6"
Fisher EZR
58 psig
198 psig
MCFH
2.
6"
Fisher EZR
56 psig
198 psig
MCFH
3.
4.
5.
RELIEF/MONITOR
1.
63 .5
MCFH
2.
MCFH
3.
4.

regulator, compressor or any single run of lesser capacity units will not impose pressures more than those for which it
../
1.
2.
Device set to operate at: (worker-monitor system)
63. 5 psig
3.
Device operates at:
63 .5 psig
4.
63 .5 psig
FPSC

1.
2.
one calendar year. Calculated to be
MCFH at
psi g.
3.
4.
operation.
Dates of last two tests.

11/8/13, 10/23/14

minimum :
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Adequate capacity.
../
../
../
../
../

FPSC

EVALUATED BY: Robert Simpson, Hassan Badran,

Farhan Alnajar
DATE: 8/12/15
LIAISON: Don Suarez
0 - Satisfactory
181- Requirement Unsatisfactory Compliance
Gate #5
192.199: REQ UffiEMENTS FOR DESIGN OF PRESSURE C O NTRO L

1.
./
2.
./
3.
NA
4.
./
5.
Be operated to determine ifthe valve is free.
./
6.
./
7.
NA
8.
NA
9.
NA
10.
over-pressuring.
./
11.
pressure.)
./

I.
NA
2.
system.
NA
3.
./
4.
NA
5.
./
6.
Systems operating at less than 12 psig from exceeding MAOP plus 50%.
NA
192.203 REQUIREMENTS: INSTRUMENT CONTROL, SAMPLING PIPE AND COMPONENTS

I.
withstand all stress without failure by fatigue .
./
2.
./
3.
./
4.
./
5.
./
6.
./
7.
./
8.
./
FPSC

1.
./
2.

./
3.
./

1.
All pipe, valves, fittings , flanges and other components are of the appropriate pressure rating and
standard.
2.
nuts used.
./
./
192.2411192.273: INSPECTION OF JOINTS
I ./

1.
protection.
./
2.
./

./
FPSC

means to identify the operator's name and phone number.
./

in splash zones, at deck penetrations and in spans over water.
./

station.
./

1.
NA
2.
equipment.
NA
3.
Pipelines entering or in vault must be steel for sizes I 0 inches or less, except for any copper control
and gauge piping.
NA
4.
NA
192.749: VAULTS
1.
every calendar year. Where gas is found, the source is determined and repaired; ventilation
2.
NA
NA
FPSC

3.

NA

1.
NA
2.
NA
3.
Ducts of sufficient height to disperse gases safely. (Above pedestrian height if practicable- 7 feet.)
NA
Vaults and pits with internal volume greater than 75 cu. ft. but less than 200 cu. feet must have:
1.
removing cover.
NA
2.
NA
or ratio of internal volume to effective ventilating area provided in cover of at least 20 to 1.
NA

1.
NA
2.
NA
3.
NA
FPSC
Maximum Possible Pressure oflnlet Gas.

RUN
SIZE
MAKE&MODEL
SIZE
ORIFICE
OUTLET
PRESSURE
INLET
PRESSURE
199 psig
OUTLET
CAPACITY
1.
4"
Fisher EZR
58 psig
199 psig
MCFH
2.
4"
Fisher EZR
56 psig
199 psig
MCFH
3.
4.
5.
RELIEF/MONITOR
1.
63 .5
MCFH
2.
MCFH
3.
4.

regulator, compressor or any single run of lesser capacity units will not impose pressures more than those for which it
./
1.
2.
Device set to operate at: (worker-monitor system)
63. 5 psig
3.
Device operates at:
63.5 psig
4.
63.5 psig
FPSC

Dates of last two tests.
10/29/13, 10/14/14
1.
2.
psi g.
one calendar year. Calculated to be
MCFH at
3.
4.
operation.

minimum:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Adequate capacity.
../
../
../
../
../

FPSC

ODORIZATION EVALUATION
EVALUATED BY: Robert Simpson, Farhan Alnajar, Hassan

Bad ran
DATE: 8/11/15
LIAISON: Don Suarez
This is a guide only, any question should be checked against the rule or regulation cited
192.625/25-12.055: ODORIZATION OF GAS

1.
Any operator receiving gas directly from a transmission supplier and distributes in any system that serves
25 or more customers must odorize all gas transported.
../
2.
As a minimum, odorant when tested must be at a concentration readily detectable at a gas and air mixture
of one-fifth the lower explosive limit.
../
3.
At least twelve times per calendar year, at intervals not to exceed 45 days, each operator shall sample gas
distributed at sufficient number of places on each system to assure the presence of odorant in a
concentration detectable at one-fifth of the lower explosive limit.
../
4.
The sample testing must be conducted using equipment manufactured specifically for odorant testing.
../
5.
The odorant injected into the gas supply may not be: (I) deleterious to persons, material or pipe, (2) The
products of combustion from the odorant must not be toxic or corrosive, and (3) The odorant may not be
soluble in water greater than 2.5 parts per 100.
../
6.
Natural gas in a transmission line in Class 3 or Class 4 location must be odorized to be detectable at onefifth of the lower explosive limit. Unless:
NA
At least 50 percent of the length of line downstream from that location is in a Class 1 or Class 2
location.
NA
The line transports gas to underground storage, gas processing plant, or an industrial plant using gas in
a process where the odorant would be harmful to the end product.
NA
In the case of a lateral line which transports gas to a distribution center, at least 50 percent of the
length is in a Class 1 or Class 2 location.
NA
7.
The odorant must be introduced without wide variation in the level of odorant.
8.
Operators of a master meter system may comply with odorization requirements by:
../
Receiving a written statement from their supplier stating proper concentrations of odorant are present,
and
NA
Conducting periodic "sniff' tests at the extremities of the system to confirm the odorant is present.
NA
GS-06 - Odorization
TYPE OF SYSTEM
I DISTRIBUTION:
MASTER METER: NA
YES
I TRANSMISSION:
I OTHER:NA
NA
ODORIZER LOCATED AT:
METHOD OF ODORIZATION
GATE STATION:
ORIFICE:
Bratt Gate Station
MECHANICAL:
FARMTAPS: NA
OTHER: Differential
ODORIZER MAKE: King Tool
ODORANT TYPE: Mercaptan
ODORIZER MODEL: DSP-250
ODORIZA TION RATE:
Variable
ODORANT CONCENTRATIONS
NUMBER OF TEST LOCATIONS: 1
RECORDS SHOW CONCENTRATIONS:
YES
TEST ON EACH SYSTEM:
ODORIZATION SATISFACTORY:
YES
YES
LOCATIONS OF FIELD EVALUATION:

Northview High School
20% ofLEL (4%- 5%)
READILY
DETECTABLE LEVEL
0.8% - 1.0% gas
0.62
0.8% - 1.0% gas

0.8%- 1.0% gas
0.8% - 1.0% gas
0.8% - 1.0% gas
TESTING EQUIPMENT
MANUFACTURED BY:
DTEX
ODORIZING EQUIPMENT INSPECTED: YES
MODEL/TYPE:
DX 1000 G
DATE LAST CALIDRATED: 6/26/15
FUNCTIONING PROPERLY? YES
COMMENTS:
File: GS-06-0dorization-1 0_ 07 .doc
GS-06 - Odorization
FPSC


Badran
DATE: 8/11/12
LIAISON: Don Suarez
This is a guide only, any question should be checked against the rule or regulation cited.
192.625/25-12.055: ODORIZATION OF GAS

1.
./
2.
./
3.
./
4.
./
5.
The odorant injected into the gas supply may not be: (1) deleterious to persons, material or pipe, (2) The
./
6.
NA
location.
NA
NA
In the case of a lateral line which transports gas to a distribution center, at least 50 percent of the
NA
7.
8.
./
and
NA
NA
GS-06 - Odorization
ODORIZA TION EVALUATION
TYPE OF SYSTEM
I DISTRIBUTION:
MASTERMETER: NA

GATE STATION:
YES
I TRANSMISSION:
I OTHER:NA
NA
Gate Station # 1
ORIFICE:
MECHANICAL:
FARM TAPS: NA
OTHER:
ODORIZER MAKE: YZ Industries
ODORIZER MODEL: 7202 GE
ODORIZA TION RATE: 1.00 lb/MMCF
YES
NUMBER OF TEST LOCATIONS : 17
YES
YES
YES
20% ofLEL (4%- 5%)
READILY
DETECTABLE LEVEL
Morris Court
0.8% - 1.0% gas
0.57
Attucks Court
0.8% - 1.0% gas
0.56
Bayfront Auditorium
0.8%- 1.0% gas
0.44
Ashley Club
0.8%- 1.0% gas
0.49
Quality Inn
0.8%- 1.0% gas
0.32
TESTING EQUIPMENT
MANUFACTURED BY:
DTEX
MODEL/TYPE:
DX 1000 G
DATE LAST CALffiRA TED: 6/26/16
COMMENTS:
FPSC
GS-06 - Odorization
TYPE OF SYSTEM
I DISTRIBUTION:
MASTER METER: NA
YES
I TRANSMISSION:
GATE STATION:
ORIFICE:
Gate Station #2
I OTHER:NA
NA
MECHANICAL:
FARM TAPS : NA
OTHER:
ODORIZA TION RATE: 1.2 Ib/MMCF
YES
RECORDS SHOW CONCENTRATIONS :
YES
ODORIZA TION SATISFACTORY:
YES
YES
20% ofLEL (4%- 5%)
READILY
DETECTABLE LEVEL
Belleview Middle School
0.8%- 1.0% gas
0.58
Admiral Trailer Park
0.8%- 1.0% gas
0.68
Pleasant Grove Elementary School
0.8%- 1.0% gas
0.29
Navy Point Elementary School
0.8%- 1.0% gas
0.63
Moreno Court
0.8%- 1.0% gas
0.63
TESTING EQUIPMENT
MANUFACTURED BY:
DTEX
MODEL/TYPE:
DX 1000 G
DATE LAST CALIBRATED: 6/26/15
COMMENTS:
FPSC
GS-06 - Odorization


Bad ran
DATE: 8/11115
LIAISON: Don Suarez
This is a guide only, any question should be checked against the rule or regulation cited.
192.625/25-12.055: ODORJZATION OF GAS

1.
./
2.
./
3.
./
4.
./
5.
The odorant injected into the gas supply may not be: (1) deleterious to persons, material or pipe, (2) The
./
6.
NA
location.
NA
NA
In the case of a lateral line which transports

~as
to a distribution center, at least 50 percent of the
7.
8.
NA
./
and
NA
NA
GS-06 - Odorization
TYPE OF SYSTEM
I DISTRIBUTION:
MASTER METER: NA
YES
I TRANSMISSION:
GATE STATION:
ORIFICE:
Gate Station #4
I OTHER:NA
NA
MECHANICAL:
FARM TAPS : NA
OTHER:
ODORIZA TION RATE: 1.0 Ib/MMCF
YES
YES
YES
YES
20% ofLEL (4%- 5%)
READILY
DETECTABLE LEVEL
Molino Park Elementary School
0.8% - 1.0% gas
0.40
Ransom Middle School
0.8%- 1.0% gas
0.29
Tate High School
0.8%- 1.0% gas
0.45
1978 Brentco Rd.
0.8%- 1.0% gas
0.72
915 Cathilene Street
0.8% - 1.0% gas
0.59
TESTING EQUIPMENT
MANUFACTURED BY:
DTEX
MODEL/TYPE:
DX 1000 G
DATE LAST CALIBRATED: 6/26/15
COMMENTS:
GS-06 - Odorization
FPSC
Regulators
'
. ~<~J"" -1
:~ '
. ...
'
\
.
ENERGY SERVICES OF PENSACOLA

REGULATOR STATION INSPECTION & MAINTENANCE REPORT
F STREET
100 N F St
Fisher EZR Size
175,000 scfh
100% Case
Name:
Location:
Regulator:
Capacity:
Orifice Size:
2"
Pressure:
Inlet
56#
Relief Valve
A. G.
Setting :
Opens
13"WC
Mon itor:
Fisher EZR 2"
Outlet
Size
Capacity
Set PSI :
7.1" WC
4" X 6"
112 scfm
12"WC
GENERAL INSPECTION- BY PASS REGULATOR & CHECK THOROUGHLY FOR:
GAUGE CHECK
~Inlet pressure accuracy
Outlet pressure accuracy

Recording mechanism working
Shut off valves operable
2...
2...
- XX
-X
REGULATOR CHECK
Bowls clean
f-Valves & seats are good
r-- Stems & guides are good
~Lock up is good
Operates freely
f-Outlet pressure good
Diaphram check
VENT CHECK
BjVent Pipe clear
Rain cap in place
RELIEF VALVE CHECK

Lubricate plug valve
Pressure valve opens
Pressure valve relieves
Reseats tight
Valve back on line
~ )
I
FINAL CHECK-OUT
r--X Outlet valve open

r--
X
f-X
f-X
Inlet valve open

By-pass valve closed
Outlet pressure good
Relief valve on line-locked
Painting as needed
CONTROL VALVE CHECK

~Inlet valve operation
By-pass valve operation
Outlet valve operation
Lubricate valves
NOTES:
Must be inspected with one calendar year and not to exceed 15 months.
Date Work Com~leted
12/11/201311 Signed
Scanlon
Equipment at Site:
IIJ.
Relief Valve: Part #93A0406A
Serial #8246-B
On Body 3-0537
5070A-T6
No equipment/devices have been replaced or modified since the previous inspection.
INITIALS:

Name:
Location :
Regulator:
Capacity:
Orifice Size:
F STREET
100 N F St
Fisher EZR Size
175,000 scfh
100% Case
2"
Pressure:
Inlet
56#
Relief Valve
A. G.
Setting :
Opens
13"WC
Monitor:
Fisher EZR 2"
Outlet
Size
Capacity
Set PSI :
7.1"WC
4" x6"
112 scfm
12"WC
VENT CHECK
REGULATOR CHECK
Bowls clean
1-Valves & seats are good
1-- Stems & guides are good
Lock up is good
X Operates freely
t-:-:X Outlet pressure good
t-- Diaphram check
'---
~Vent Pipe clear

Rain cap in place
:K
GAUGE CHECK
X Inlet pressure accuracy
t-:-:~Outlet pressure accuracy
t-:-:J5_ Shut off valves operable
FINAL CHECK-OUT
'X Outlet valve open
RELIEF VALVE CHECK

'X
1-Pressure valve opens
X Pressure valve relieves
~ Reseats tight
Valve back on line
25-
7
7
~
~
'---
7
1--
Inlet valve open

Painting as needed
CONTROL VALVE CHECK
Inlet valve operation

Lubricate valves
NOTES:
Date Work Comeleted
Equipment at Site:
Relief Valve: Part #93A0406A
11/4/201411 Signed
Serial #8246-B
On Body 3-0537
liT. jackson
5070A-T6
INITIALS:

Name:
Location :
Monitor:
Pressure:
Inlet
---198#
Outlet
58#
Start To Close:
Fully Close:

VENT CHECK
Ovent Pipe clear
DRain cap in place
GAUGE CHECK
Inlet pressure accuracy
REGULATOR CHECK
Bowls clean
Valves & seats are good
Stems & guides are good
Lock up is good
Operates freely
x Outlet pressure good
Diaphram check
FINAL CHECK-OUT
x Outlet valve open
x Inlet valve open
Painting as needed
RELIEF VALVE CHECK

Reseats tight
Valve back on line
CONTROL VALVE CHECK
Lubricate valves
NOTES:
3/4/13 removed 10" Fisher monitor

11/8/13 run #1 Fisher 6" EZR re ulator set 58#
11/8/13 run #1 Fisher 6" EZR re ulator set 64# monitor
11/8/13 run #2 Fisher 6" EZR re ulator set 56# run# 2 6"Fisher EZR set 64# monitor
Must be ins ected with one calendar ear and not to exceed 15 months.
Date Work Completed II
3/5/201311 Signed IlL Crosby
Equipment at Site:
10" Monitor
Type 1061 Pneumatic Piston Rotary Actuator
3620J Positioner
V300 Rotary Control Valve
4160KR Controller
INITIALS:

Name:
Location:
Monitor:
Pressure:
Inlet
---198#
Outlet
58#
Start To Close:
Fully Close:

VENT CHECK
Ovent Pipe clear
DRain cap in place
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
GAUGE CHECK
~ Inlet pressure accuracy
X Outlet pressure accuracy

r-- Recording mechanism working
f-JS_ Shut off valves operable
FINAL CHECK-OUT
Outlet valve open
X Inlet valve open
Painting as needed
RELIEF VALVE CHECK

r-- Lubricate plug valve
r-- Pressure valve relieves
f-.
Reseats t1ght
Valve back on line
:=
;
REGULATOR CHECK
Bowls clean
Lock up is good
Operates freely
Diaphram check
CONTROL VALVE CHECK

Lubricate valves
10/20/14 run 2 rebuilt re

10/23/14 run 1 rebuilt re
ilots, monitor set

ilots, monitor set
63.5#, worker set

63.5#, worker set
56#
58#
Date Work Completed
10/23/201411 Signed liT. Jackson
Equipment at Site:
II
10" Monitor
Type 1061 Pneumatic Piston Rotary Actuator
3620J Positioner
V300 Rotary Control Valve
4160KR Controller
No e ul ment/devlces have been re laced or modified since the
INITIALS:

Name:
Location :
Regulator:
Capacity:
Pressure:
Inlet 199#
:;:IIIII
Relief Valve
Setting :
Opens
Outlet
58#
Size
Capacity:
GENERAL INSPECTION- BY PASS REGULATOR & CHECK THOROUGHLY FOR :

VENT CHECK
Ovent Pipe clear
DRain cap in place
GAUGE CHECK
REGULATOR CHECK
Bowls clean
Lock up is good
Operates freely
Diaphram check
FINAL CHECK-OUT
x Outlet valve open

x Inlet valve open
RELIEF VALVE CHECK

Reseats tight
Valve back on line

Painting as needed
CONTROL VALVE CHECK

Lubricate valves
NOTES:
4" Fisher EZR monintor set
63.5#
Date Work Completed
II
10/29/201311 Signed IlL Crosby
Equipment at Site:
Fisher EZR 5/N - 20795264
INITIALS:

Name:
Location :
Regulator:
Capacity:
Gate #5 (Run One)

8 Mile creek Rd.
Fisher EZR Size
4"
Pressure:
Inlet 199#
Relief Valve
Setting :
Opens
Outlet
Size
Capacity:
58#
VENT CHECK
BVent Pipe clear
Rain cap in place
GAUGE CHECK
~ Outlet pressure accuracy
r-:-:- Recording mechanism working
~ Shut off valves operable
~
t-t-1--
r-r--
RELIEF VALVE CHECK

.
Reseats t1ght
Valve back on line
REGULATOR CHECK
X Bowls clean
r-:-:X Valves & seats are good
~ Stems & guides are good
Lock up is good
X Operates freely
r-:-:X Outlet pressure good
~
...__ Diaphram check
::8:
FINAL CHECK-OUT
X Outlet valve open
1-X Inlet valve open
t-By-pass valve closed
r-:-:X Outlet pressure good
r-- Relief valve on line-locked
Painting as needed
'--.--:-:-
CONTROL VALVE CHECK
;Inlet valve operation

Lubricate valves
NOTES:
10/14/14 rebuilt regulators and pilots, monitor set@ 63.5#, worker set_@_ 58#
Date Work Com~leted
10/14/201411 Signed
liT. Jackson
Eguiement at Site:
Fisher EZR S/N 20795264
INITIALS:

Y ,tGate #5 (Run Two)
Name:
Location :
Regulator:
Capacity:
Orifice Size:
8 Mile Creek Rd.

Fisher EZR Size
4"
1Pressure:
Inlet
199#
Relief Valve
Setting :
Opens
Monitor:
Fisher EZR
Outlet
Size
Capacity
Set PSI :
56#
100% Case
GENERAL INSPECTION - BY PASS REGULATOR & CHECK THOROUGHLY FOR:

VENT CHECK
BVent Pipe clear
Rain cap in place
r--
r-r--
r-x
r--
GAUGE CHECK
~Inlet pressure accuracy

x
x
r-r--
'----
REGULATOR CHECK
Bowls clean
Lock up is good
Operates freely
Diaphram check
FINAL CHECK-OUT
x Outlet valve open
r-x Inlet valve open
r-r-- By-pass valve closed
r-- Relief valve on line-locked
r-- Painting as needed
'-r-
RELIEF VALVE CHECK

r-- Lubricate plug valve
r-1-- Pressure valve opens
1-- Reseats tight
1-- Valve back on line
!--
CONTROL VALVE CHECK
~Inlet valve operation

Lubricate valves
I
4"Fisher EZR monintor@ 63.5#
NOTES:
10/29/201311 Si9ned IlL Crosb~
I
II
EguiQment at Site:
Fisher EZR S/N - 20795266
Date Work
Com~leted
INITIALS:

Name:
Pressure:
Inlet
199#
Outlet
Location :
Relief Valve
Size
8 Mile Creek Rd.
-=F~is"":"h_e_r-=E-=z-=R-S~i~ze;........;.;.;.~4~"- Setting :
-:O~p-e_n_s_ _ _ _ _ Capacity
Regulator:
Fis:-he-r-=E~Z~R-- Set PSI :
Monitor:
Capacity:
---~1~0~0~~~C~a-s_e_ __
Orifice Size:
56#

VENT CHECK
Vent Pipe clear
Rain cap in place
GAUGE CHECK
REGULATOR CHECK
Bowls clean
X Lock up is good
Operates freely
X Outlet pressure good
Diaphram check
FINAL CHECK-OUT
Outlet valve open
Inlet valve open
Painting as needed
RELIEF VALVE CHECK

Reseats tight
Valve back on line
CONTROL VALVE CHECK
__.:...:.
Lubricate valves
___
10/14/14 monitor set
63.5#, worker set
NOTES:
56#
Date Work Completed
II
10/14/201411 Signed
IlL Crosby
Equipment at Site:
Fisher EZR S/N - 20795266
No equl ment/devices have been replaced or modified since the previous ins ection.
INITIALS:
Odorization
Sampling
Points
i-,
~ ~
.~
~ ~ ~
NOKOMIS RD
0:
j
~
z
a:
z
HWY 164
Cl
0:
....
Cl)
~
w
i:J
z
~
Northview High School
a:
W HIGHWAY4
Bratt - Odorant
Kan,
HIGHWAY 4A
0:
x"
Cl
ARTHUR BROWN RD
HIGHWAY 168
Odorant
WROACH RD
Ernest Ward Middle School
COXRD
Legend
>-
Sniff Test Location
"x
Odorant
~
:r
Molino Park Eleme
MOLINORO
HIGHWAY 196
-t-~
...
H~
'Q
:.S.~
Jim Allen School
Gate 4 - Odorant
Kathleen
Ransom Midd. le SchooiTate
/.
)g
SchooiBrentco
E.
<J>
i>Q
S.
DRD
W ROBERTS RD
'S-~
?;.
1J,,_<'-I'.s-
RANK REEDER RD
-t,-0
W NINE MILE RO
.o_. Gulf Power 8 (Gate 5)- Odorant
~.>-<' A
";;'ox
E NINE MILE RD
18'
'\
Pal
W DETROIT BLVD
1
Beulah Elemen ary School
"<-;.
Andrews (Farm
Tap)
"t-
~ ~
E Oll.
Saufley
-
George
,..
~ v-..
......
St
C!J(IS}~P~~ Ct
Sc~~.,.,~
~~~ Ashley Club
e
ST- ~tibn
;a
Jim Bailey School
ege
...
. . 2 _Odorant
<',t,rns Ct
rnral Trailer Park
Attuc~ . 1st Baptist
.
ACKSON
._
E
S
Cl
'"\!'
Montcl~lement~School
'WICHIGAN AVE
Sherwood Elementary
0:
0:
CREIGHT,J\lN RD
~ gl )
Sta~ 'li.. Bellvlew Middle School
s Middle
Stone~ ~ ~ (P-~Ia State C

~w
CERNY RD
~uality
Ferry
embrane
I ~"'
E JOHN SO.
_} \
Jacos
If
:~~ation
Inn
Leak Repair
N~
14
19491
ERGY SERVICES OF PENSACOLA

LEAK AND PIPE CONDITION REPORT
.
TimeAssigned
UJ~L~
1._'2._2 &. ~ ch~_s ell: /tue_ City _/i'--'.=t'll'---'--"'s'-"4-' ~
~~-------t2J1j I I6 If'] I lLJf.J Time Arnved l_.Ll/_Ll~
J!.LJ Ti e~eo p eted-LL_[__~ __ I ::?JtLJ-
ServiceOrderNo.
Address
oate
Received
~~ ~9/ 2li]
1/ L~ Jo~~arrow
Received
'l
Safe Time
[+.J-~_LLJ_ -~~ate~~~~J~~c.~~ '!Jj!J
_ ---~--- _ -~- -+- r--_! __ -- ---1--k+ p

- --t --+-+- -~ ~;--;r__ +-lL~~~-' <-r -- __ I
F =_
c---r~f--+
{:(: ~t.
J ---
--1-- ~ -
1-- -
STEEL PIPE CONDITION

Pipe Condition
Good 0
Fair
0
~~
--iJ=H-~j _k!B-~~Tir ~1I;~=R:it-::

T''$!?o
--- -t --- --t---t--j-t1J~---~6!1j --@~~-1 f i
"-.._
Condition
Good
t -f-dJ--i~~tl ~~-?~ ~e~;ae D:0 I

I
L. I
'--i :&:.
No Leak Found 0
. r ...1
:
- I
L I
.-
!J-
D P ~~ . .( ~~L.
I i --
--- j
Inside
Poor
Poor
Meter Leak Data
~~;
4~i
~~;, ~~
~~~:
rT
yraded
Graded By
tf')
"
11
--r f, cJl{!{)
Fair
____..-/" a -'
~~f\ \\
;j
~ ~~1.._,_.,r.("
'J
Le~ Lo~~~~~de .~
.J
FILL OUT FORM COMPLETELY- Note leak locations on sketch with (x)
LEAK FOUND DATA

Detected By
Flame Ionization
0
,g_
CGI
LMD
0
VisuaiNegetatiQn 0
Odor
0
Collecting
In Building
Near Building
In Man Hole
In Soil
In Air
Other
0
0
0
tGI
0
0
Source
Main
0
Service
0
Svc Tap/Tee 0
Valve
~
Meter Set
0
Regulator
0
Cust. Pipe
0
Other
0
Surface
Lawn
Soil
Paved
Other
rJZL
CGI Test
%Gas:
Pressure
LP
0
IP
~
,L)
~~
0
0
LEAK REPAIR DATA

Component/Part of System
Pipe & Size
Leak Cause
Repair Data
~M=ai~n~Pzi~~e-~O~~~~c~~PiL~e~~O~B~~S=~=e~I~[~U~'~C=o=r=ro=si=on~~A=
G=O~B=G=O~~O
~, Re~ i rD~
~M=ai~n..:..V=al~ve=---~&I~.:....:.R=ise=r~V~a:;..:lv~e~O~C=t:::....=St=e=ei_+I -I-'N..:..a=tu=r=ai..:..F~o~
rc=es~----1-=0=-2=.......j Repaired By
t -~~ - J V
c)t?5h
t)
O=+~M~e~te~r~S=et~~O=+~C~as=t~lr~on~I ---+~E~
xc~a~
va=ti:..::.
on~--------~0~3~----~~~~------~
Drip
Svc. Tap
Regulator
Plastic
Operations
04
Recheck Data
1-'F~i=lli~ng~--~O~~C=us=t...:..P~i~=e~~O~O~~=M~~~-~M=a=t=er~~:::...l=or-=W
~e=ld=s~~~-=O
~s Posmve
0
Negative
~
Other (descrtbel
0
Equipment
C ~s Rechked Date 1J / J..r)- J
I
:~:~~:::~=~~~=================:==::o:t:hr:o:t:s=F=o=:rc:=e:=o:=m:g===:=o:7:
i'
Other
REMARKS
/h
(') AJ
A- ., 1JL
!.A ) ,c:l
Customer Affected
Fonn No. 9.1
Yes
No ~ . Explain
o~
Rechecked By
~Yn \ h
~
</
nc~ts
L~
12 s;~:u1""~
3/ 1
\j 14 -
N~
19100

~::::.orctits~i!f_l_~~~; -\y
~i;:ived
~_lL_I I l~j~j I lL.~

[Z J ~__.16!__L. . .J
Received
~;;~eA:&;:.~LLe:>JQJ 11.~
l__ Q.::L; la__ t!.__l

IL Ji ..J&.?Ja..J
Time Arrived
Safe Time
I
Date Completed
l__L__l_[ JJ __ jt?_]
l___[Jj I lLlJJI lLJ.iJ
,_ - i
---, - 1
Time Completed
Pipe Condition
Ct. Cond ition
Good
Good
Leak Grade Data
10
Fair
Fair
Poor
Poor
Meter Leak Data
30
No Leak Found
Inside
D
D
Outside
I
LEAK FOUND DATA

Detected By
Flame Ionization
GGI
LMD
VisuaiNegetatiQn
Odor
Collecting
In Building
Near Building
In Man Hole
In Soil
In Air
Other
0
~
0
0
0
(J5i'( Svc. Pipe
Main Pipe
Main Valve
0 Riser Valve
Drip
0 Meter Set
Svc. Tap
0 Regulator
Fitting
D Gust. Pipe
Other (describe)
0
Source
0 Main
0 Service
0 )3vc Tap/Tee
0
0
1 Valve
0
0 Meter Set
0
Regulator
0
0
Gust. Pipe
0
Other
0
LEAK REPAIR DATA
Pipe & Size

B. Steel i'
Ct. Steel ! t; ..
Cast Iron !I
!
Plastic
Other
I
;
0
0
0
0
D
I
I
I
M
a
.j_
Surface
Lawn
Soil
Paved
Other
Leak Cause
Corrosion AGO BG,~
Natural Forces
Excavation
Operations
Material or Welds
Equipment
Othr 0/S Force Dmg
Other
0
(
0'
CGI Test
%Gas:
/
7 070
Pressure
LP
0
IP
Er
02
03
04
Ds
Ds
07
08
Repair Data
Repair Date
d.- - I ,-:_ t'-L
Repaired By ~- / h...._ //.-.
Recheck Data
Positive
~ Negative 0
Rechked Date ol-1~1
Rechecked By /,i__, k.._fi~_;d;, v
(/
REMARKS
11 Ll..
Y' c._~ J k e/ i'Lv:lt '4j n?" e -1-r::> C.rn' ./?? rj~ /..,. .:Itt
/~. . l i/ .; o R/ /'9-A//x -d.-?- r-~ dA~ oft, IV/'1 ~~~
.t.e c/ /e:'c.. ?
'IJL.'> ;J r.:. ,4;
L-i. A /)
/h -.. . /t.
Customer Affected
Form No. 9.1
,.-
a'
I A-AArd
Yes
c. . k :ru!f J/f , a...w A-t/.

/
No
If Yes . Explain
10/2009
N~
21476

Service Order
~o.
9
Address
~:~~ived
l_LL__L~_j:JJ_?::_b.J ~
~ ~ '23::
;1/, f< df-'
Time
Received
[d LL_J ___j
Time Assigned
City
__
__,_f/;'""-:Llo,jt..l'-""._;_1+-'--'do:::._=:_::L"--"A--'--------
ld.LJ I ~J'-J I lL )iJ Time Arrived 13 1111/ 1'1 1 Time Completed ~~Jt'jt
.fi'AA
?ui.A
~j
1a11 Q ~~J L Safe Time ~L~ l 7.J&'} Date Completed ~11 1 I ~lg I t_JLj
Note NORTH with arrow
f1L,
V'
t/5-J pv_t.,
_,{)
Good
1 CY"' 2 0
tJ. rz_'1
D
D
0
rl
~~~lt -
_'7/ ~ --
Leak Location
Inside
I
~ !b~
~ ~' 0 ~
Graded ~Y
~--1
~~
~r l~
IJ/ -"'t?p -If
'[
;g
Poor
Poor
Til'6
30
Date Graded
.A.
--
---- ~.
D
D
Fair
Fair
Meter Leak Data
No Leak Found
!-"~
--
Good
Leals,.-Grade Data
~-Djo ..c.
'?
Pipe Condition
Ct. Condition
'/b
---- 1-
~H P-C
Outside
t.ld"
,.
.!
,_,/
I
LEAK FOUND DATA

Collecting
In Building
Near Building
In Man Hole
In Soil
In Air
Other
Detected By
Flame Ionization
0
CGI
0
LMD
~
VisuaiNegetatiQn 0
Odor
0
Source
0 Main
0 Service
0 Svc TapfTee
0 Valve
&30
Meter Set
Regulator
Cust. Pipe
Other
Surface
Lawn
Soil
Paved
Other
g
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
CGI Test
%Gas:
ro%
tf3"
Pressure .
LP
0
IP
tB- 1--
0
0
LEAK REPAIR DATA

Component/Part c~ System
Svc. Pipe
Main Pipe
Main Valve
0 Riser Valve
Drip
0 Meter Set
Svc. Tap
0 Regulator
Fitting
0 Cust. Pipe
Other (describe)
0
ar
0
0
0
0
0
Pipe & Size

;2_1/'"
B. Steel
Ct. Steel
Cast Iron I
Plastic
Other
;;J'-ls rJJLll{h IW II. f/IC"6"
Leak Cause J
Corrosion AGO BG.(2f
Natural Forces
Excavation
Operations
Material or Welds
Equipment
Othr 0/S Force DmQ
Other
REMARKS
tl1
02
03
04
Ds
Os
07
Oa
Repair Data
; ....(;?-/{
Repair Date
Repaired By
WINV
..
Rechf}<;k Data
Positive
)lJ
Rechked Date
Rechecked By
. '
""'
.J
Nega-~
I ..~,
)5{/I'P./J
/fJv;1d G~IJK .a-J ;;;//{ /fJhrJ WE TO CCJ/Zo5z:t;rJ, ~t"jJffe/)_ {A)/ ;;(xj;lr' /J/Jff,(~~
v
SYfP 75$~D /(} t/6/r;C?'y N(J ?w-th</ LeftU - ANNlf fovrJb I ,_8(_:6MJtf'b
AAJb !JJiJGre .4owN_ //1i'JOfJ_trS Rrvtlt.flfr dJ /ff5P' JJ/ll{L./)fV
AAL
~Yiff<i_/
r;g Uri/ietJHS be'Cif5t'f1Ji:'~
Customer Affected
Form No. 9.1
Yes
No
1/
If Yes, Explain
10/2009
N~
20862

Service Order No.
Address
Date
Received
Time
Received
IJJ._l_L:Ll.Jl!::.L_.. J 0
l.._~j_~o !o J A-.--.~City ..z_f1__c;_itl_(5._'fi_d_o_L-=-A-'--------Time Assigned
Vc:v4< J ..5 t ~ UJ ~h "f=

~
LJi.] I 1~<2::] I lt l..:rj Time Arrived I / 1-;J_qL_l
Time Completed
LL L_LJL__Ia__j
Date Completed
~~~_i.Q_j.f,.,..._
Safe Time
LL:::LI Ltl a I
l__gj I ~1~ I It 1'-f i
vU'
~ ~r:
~
Pipe Conditio[")
- .---Jtt. Ct. Condition
I
-
l.ti.flJ ~( If)pi
f---
:~t I
Detected By
Flame Ionization
CGI
LMD
VisuaiNegetatiQn
Odor
Collecting
In Building
Near Building
In Man Hole
In Soil
In Air
Other
Leak Grade~ta
'rz
il
1\j
2~
10
tJ ,..,
7o%
--
oiJ2l

Good
Fair
D
Good
Fair
D
30
..Jl
Graded By
1Jf!t_mh_
Leak Location
Inside 0
Outside ~
I
1\~ 8IU~~ ,~
'"
~ ) ~ ~~
!--3c2_...-L_tf_
1---
D
D
Meter Leak Data
No Leak Found
Date Graded
Poor
Poor
r
~~
J
'}_,,..,
o ~
LEAK FOUND DATA

0
0
0
0
Svc. Pipe
Main Pipe
Main Valve
0 Riser Valve
Drip
0 Meter Set
Svc. Tap
0 Regulator
Fitting
0 Cust. Pipe
Other (describe)
0
rm
0
0
0
0
0
Source
Main
Service
Svc Tap/Tee
Valve
!)' Meter Set
"o Regulator
Cust. Pipe
Other
0
0
0
0
Surface
Lawn
Soil
Paved
Other
0
0
0
t.2"
Leak Cause
Corrosion AGO BG/X.Natural Forces
Excavation
Operations
Material or Welds
Equipment
Othr 0/S Force Dm_g_
Other
'2
Pressure
LP
0
IP
~ I--
0
0
0
0
0
0
LEAK REPAIR DATA
Pipe & Size

B. Steel I
Ct. Steel ~ -
Cast Iron I
Plastic
Other
CGI Test
%Gas:
/n
Repair Data
,.2_- ,2_ ,Z- I 4'
Repair
Date
~
02 Repaired By d'. ~L-....
03
04
Os
De
07
Recheck Data
Positive
~ Negative 0
Rechked Date ;J~-tLr
Rechecked By /;; :. r/.~M~e.
Oa
REMARKS
~fl.+t~.d' ~_f/~r k~~ ~A; ..._ ?:.,~ A
;z )L~ b-./,-H~ C-~~ .__
?.4c._e d An/ck: ~ ~ .-~ .~---~- / / ~):e 4L _,..~ ./'A<...h.~ ~
~
C7
Customer Affected
Form No. 9.1
Yes
No
~lfYes , Explain
b=l
10/2009
N~
20934
ENERGY SERVICES OF PENSACOLA .

LLL--"""'-'"-'- !JJ? _j
Service Order No.

Address
Date
Received
Time
Received
;kJ
L_{L~ ulc.J
Time Assigned
k ;oj-5 to a De
Lcl_J I Llls::J I l1ll.fJ
Time Arrived
ls:-_ ll _li _Jtt_l
Time Completed
ls:__i~_j_ett_]
Safe Time
[ff-]2S'f;.zh_J
Date Completed
Lf C, q I
City
_,__p_,e/1..:"'-"'-'S'-='q._,C..._,,0"'"'/'-='q..___ _ _ _ _ _ __
L1.t61~_j
T-
lJ.L_J I ~ I l&J
~ ~
~
~
()
'
Pipe Condition
Ct. Condition
LeJk Grade Data
t.{(o 'f(
.~
1aY
Poor
Poor
0
0
..:::L
20
Meter Leak Data
30
0
No Leak Found
Date Graded
Graded By
lvf.,~k (2 L
\A I r_k. Flo~'~- Lf\
,1~
Leak Location
Inside 0
Outside
il
ffl'!
~ ~~
t-o=
~'(<'"
r o
I
!L:J./1'1
I '
'
0
0
Fair
Fair
--
-"J
0
0
1'-'q
6.
I---
Good
Good
o;r
~ ~' ~
J
LEAK FOUND DATA

Collecting
0,; In Building
Near Building
~
0
In Man Hole
D/ In Soil
(iJ'
In Air
Other
Detected By
Flame Ionization
CGI
LMD
VisuaiNegetatiQn
Odor
Com_p_onent/Part of System
Main Pipe
0 Svc. Pipe
Main Valve
0 Riser Valve
Drip
0 Meter Set
Svc. Tap
0 Regulator
~ Cust. Pipe
Fitting
Other (describe)
0
Source
0
Lawn
rtf
Soil
0
Paved
Other
0
0
0
Cust. Pipe
0
Other
0
LEAK REPAIR DATA
Pipe & Size

1 ~//f
Ct. Steel I ~' 1
Cast Iron I
Plastic
I
Other
13' B. Steel
0
0
0
0
Surface
0 1/Main
~ Service
0 Svc Tap/Tee
0 Valve
0 Meter Set
0 Regulator
Leak Cause
Corrosion AGO BGO
Natural Forces
Excavation
Operations
Material or Welds
Equipment
COthr 0/S Force Dmg
Other
GY
CGI Test
% Gas : ;~o%
Pressure
LP
Dv
IP
r:tr
0
0
0
Repair Data
;- Z ">"- -lv
0 1 Repair Date
0 2 Repaired By
/1 A c f/. ~.;;
03
Recheck Data
04
.-(3'
Positive
Negative
Os
0
g(
07
De
Rechked Date
Rechecked By
; ... 2.;-----/y
,4, 1l
<:
rLtt'~
REMARKS
)J . -/-) -r' J oe .').( ~ .../. -hi~ tJ/? /,k cJ i 1- ... dJ ,tr ./-/ e
4 0 t.--1_,( ti( -1. C) .AT .,t,(< h e: 1n I' )~. /( 1'...- f.t~d .J ~/J//'1 -t7 . ~,ojtl, c.j( 11 >. -ef. a.., d A/~ ul
'/ , i( ,-;-r. .( r
~ h /j ~ r,.. UA lv..f'
~f> s .P T M.,..f.o......- / cJ r /VI. ) J r-i:l- J"v- a,.-~,~) jrJ 6. ~~/
L ; f- Wi -fo,..,.. A-tal~ r / _,.. //c ,.,- lfi'o-f./~k
/111' .+..P _/ A/.0 ,., -f~(? .,..-- Jcg~. r Foe_..,.,? ,
L / ..A/. J:oL .A~-,_/' lck ,...--e~ /,.., ,!.! 5 4/(;).....-/lP 4~cA-f a,.) ci-Jv/.-~t c;e/vf').fl ~\.t{ cr__/
w e t~}e_ d 9/6 trAc:d'2 d.n 2~~,4., Q..j l't)S.kaf7
/)/\LX( A
/1./o C> ..j.,(R? ;-<a_ IL~
~LA/J
S-e/:~/f
(]
> ket.t~
,,. .,
t.--,IJ
Customer Affected
Form No. 9.1
Yes
No
If Yes, Explain
10/2009
VALVES
SYSTEM SURVEYED: Pensacola, Energy Services of
DATE SURVEYED: 8/12/15
INSPECTOR NAME: Robert Simpson, Farhan Alnajar, Hassan Badran
VALVE LOCATION/INFO.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
II.
12.
13 .
14.
15 .
16
17
1515 E. Heinberg St. BLK

Valve #1
Valve #2
Valve #3
Valve #4
3051 Creighton Road
Valve #12
3051 Creighton Road
Valve #13
407 Brent Ln & Davis Hwy
Valve #47
407 Brent Ln & Davis Hwy
Valve #48
922 Michigan Avenue
Valve #341
922 Michigan A venue
Valve #342
85 E. Olive Road
Valve #447
8025 N. Palafox St.
Valve #449
7201 Klondike Road/ Mobile Hwy
Valve #466
7201 Klondike Road/ Mobile Hwy
Valve #467
7945 Pine Forest Rd. & Wildlake Blvd.
Valve #488
7945 Pine Forest Rd. & Wildlake Blvd.
Valve #489
6890 Community Dr. & Godwin Ln
Valve #507
PSC GS-14 Form
Able to
Locate (b)
ACCESS
(a) & (b)
OPERATES
(a)&(b)
Protected (a)tampering/
damage
./
TAG
(b)
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
18.
19
20.
21
22
23
24
25
26.
6890 Community Dr. & Godwin Ln

Valve #508
5595 Leesway Blvd. & Langley Avenue
Valve #552
5595 Leesway Blvd. & Langley Avenue
Valve #554
5691 Leesway Blvd. & Cherry Laurel
Valve #562
5691 Leesway Blvd. & Cherry Laurel
Valve #563
4081 Bonway Dr. & Leesway Blvd.
Valve #586
4081 Bonway Dr. & Leesway Blvd.
Valve #588
3281 Bayou Blvd. & Gumwood Rd.
Valve #779
3281 Bayou Blvd. & Gumwood Rd.
Valve #780
PSC GS-14 Form
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
./
Cathodic
Protection

CATHODIC PROTECTION TEST RECORD
TEST LEAD !
:71
INSULATOR
Page_
INTERFERENCE BONO
_ _ _ ____.!E::::::...!....
. ____.:::..
I.;_;_
J./..:....:
J_F,
......;:d:. /?.,
:. . ::.___:Z..
::::_._:.M...;.:E.rS
:::..:..::....:
-'t=l~::...::(.c.......:_
S I:.._
:;<\:...._
' --..,.,.--
DETAIL OF LOCATION
SYSTEM
\ t.t;; E. of E. Lotu-1ri" ~L
18'2..1
AREA
D- ~
DATE
'I TEST
CHECKED
MTR
if
11
PIS
READINGS
!
INIT
I! . DATE I TEST
!I CHECKED I Mm
pIs
j
MAP
; ISS"
.,
I IS""~
IS;
I
PIS
, READINGS
INIT
il
!!
REMARKS
Ii----+I! -~===~ar--+~~..;.;;.;..;.,.;.
1?6-o
C:::/R ceJ.-~
I
I1 - - - t - - - l r - - - - - - -:11i
___ ,It-~--;1--+-
l1
ir--:
i---!'f---7...=1-=
-9:...::.9....;..~_F--T_I..':. . D
:: :. . S;:::___~
"
LA.
~_
____...-=.3:....t/_ _ _.1 - - - - - - T - - - ----+----1------~~
Lf-_-.::...
5 --=
-o=o-'-!_r=--+1
-'-=
.3:......::S=---r-::-LA--'-+-----'''-=z..=-...<.,
.......__ _~1-------:1--+1 ---t---il_ _ _ _ _ _;!
~ ~~~
-q~
-o~~~~~~F-rl~l-2~~g~~~~u+l-~~13
~--~if----+l--l~_~_r
!, _________i!
!,1~~~~28-~~=2~!~r_. ~~;.2='-+~=~~l
v __._l7~---+i__~l~-+-----~'---i~------~! i
l i~lo_.~'~
~~=~~~F
~~~~~~
- 7__
o ~
Av
~l--~,~~~~~==d.ib~--~'--~----+-~----------~!i
/f.L.LI/-.~..L.I/L.:. ~u: : . . !-tf !i~f--+j_.:..!<Jo79~
~ ~~
;.:10::::!=----===_..~,/~
. . 9 -CDd~~c>-:D~::....___
.: . : t:e<~--a-p----l-~--:-1- - +j-+------__;!!
!i q'~ 27-- oif f
.
0
~ '!,a
.
/7
I
!
!i
II ,..;..
.........
,..-
.. -
~---+~--4-----+--+1--~~~
q_
v____~---~--1~--~---+--------~!1
!i
I
I \Y
!
:!
g
l
I
I
I
I
"
I
!I
!I
I
1
j
1
i
IC
:I
II
I
I
:I
II
!i
;!
:I
'
'
I
I
I
i
!
I
I
I
!
I
I
li
I
I
I
'
'
I
I
I
'
I
I
I
l
ij
,,'j
,!
:i
II
:
I
i

TEST LEAD j
7/ J
INSULATOR
Page_
INTERFERENCE BONO .
Mo5tL.-t[ ,LI-w . ./.

.
7'/S- C\Ji2.~ 8G>C AT 'R~T~IM-(..
0:,
oETAILOFLocAnoN
'
8'1 W. of CyNc,fl 'ir,
SYSTEM
/8"2...1
\l,.,lbrl,.,C...,
r------AREA
1)-3
DATE
CHECKED
t.f-7-98 !
TEST
MTR
P/S
READINGS '
P/S
l4 !
r- I , s 3
'
!ITP~"Fl~
.i
. 51
"lf ~-
ijq-17~lr .-49 TZJ~i

i >?-) t/- D/, I F- I tj Lj i/,( I
lq-J!-(J1 If ! .1/6 lf/J i
I
!c;s-; / h"rl j:
li!D-JL/0
IF-
: ~\-\ .. \\ If
!iQ~n- IJ I n-
il ~t J 7- /,~ f
I 16!~~11/ K
!
i.
II
;j
!I
!i
I "1{~
_..
'
70
i
i.dlq
i
..
---
Lj.
;
i
i
i
I
li
)v..-0_'-2_ ~(,
I
II
I
I!
II
il
I
i
I
I
i
l
I
I
I
.I
;;
i
I
0:
II
!
~i
jl
'
i
~i
;j
'j
II
:1
'
I
I
I
'
1
I
.!
'!
;i
II
I
i
II
ii
.;
j,
:I
--
- ---
-----
i
I
--- --------- ----
;j
I\ I
l~
:!
'i
:
a
I /J
.A tl\ 'S
'I
.!
---
I
I
!I
il
I
n (' . ~"
I
\
II
:J
'
li;;
II
REMARKS
I'
'I
I
'
-----
!
I
i INIT
I
I
l/ 4
~M i ... Lf/.l
~/
I
I
~----'
{'
. J/ 1r
I \ 1..\ 3
i!!/I i
t./6
b~
PIS
. READINGS
I
I
CtJ
L5J t) II!
' .S !
Af9t1 !
- ~) ~j
- - --
4/u
'1._5"
.L/ r;r
L/0
, L/_ ~--
_.< I
MTR
,lfg
i! 8~Jl/-oqll-
?
' '..{
r.;:.
! ptl:
19 :~
~~ '
- - -1~
f7!
,Lj'f
'
.5_]
I _ 'IAJI
I Cf-18--03 I f' I . '/2
I TEST I
.53
ILf.--5-oo I r: I , S[ !LA I'

i
jj, '
.55
!i 8- ?- 0 I Ir!10-28-oz rrq; ! ~// !
I
DATE
CHECKED
INIT i
:
!
''
'
i
'I
!
'i
.!
I
C:_L
. :s 'f'__
---L---'-------
--
PENSACOLA GAS SERVICE

TEST LEAD
rjS-
of
10" GA S h1A~tl
tf'.s;
c.v.;.o.
d .
Cu1?.B Boy:
"R'iErAIII t.tlfo WALt .
DETAIL OF LOCATION
AI s-,oc.
~NSU LATOR
c=J
ofW.pC. o.f !v,o.JcJ.I or;
INTERFERENCE:
l.b 8'-1-' t;/.
Acc. Fcs r.::c.,
oiJ
FORM CP707
ElOND
.-(_AR.eo~
oN
SYSTEM
MAP
A IlEA
WAU..)
o{ R~r.-4/.VIII(. w~tL
18?-1
IS'S
tS(p
- ---- - .. -.. -. __-_::- :---:=:c.-===-=--==--::===============-------r- .:. :.::=:=:::-.::::::.c.:-~==-c.==----=------__:':=-:- 1

~
LOCATIO
N
SKETCH
ABOVE GROUND
C:=J
GROUND
D-3
1-5'7
------ -- --~-=---=-=:.='.L::-_ _
--=:___
--_1
[. A120
INSTALL ED BY
.., 3
0 LL
I =--- '--- -=
_:_"G:_T_,__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ,
DATE INSTALLED _
=========="';========"====~
TYPE OF BOND
TYPE OF INSULATOR
HOTLINE----------FLANGED ---------II
COMPRESSION j_O_--
'
c=::l
DIODE ------- ---- -
c=::J
REST . WIRE -------
c6
SOLID------------
c:::::=:J
- -
--
-;
1 - - , - - - ----'-- ---- ------- ----------- - - MoBIL 1-lwy. 1

1
--
--
--
--
I
--
-.
NORTH'
I
- I
J/
' t-
..
. -.
--
---
;x._ /~
rt- :),-- X . :"~- ___ -__
c=J
C=:J
--
-~ _R "' TA.i~ll \11(,. WA.LU ~
I
I~'
TEST LEAD COLOR CODE
--
--
L.
-I
---,
GA.'$
I
/
I
--
l.:
\1)
---
"-
fTf
I -- - -
-- 0
.: -;' .....-'
I
TEST
METER:
A-Agra
TEST
DATE
CHECKED MTR
M-Miller
S - Simpson
P/S
READINGS
\NIT
T- Tinker
REMARKS
DATE
CHECKED
HST
P/S
MTR
READINGS
GR~trLt Wm ~
1~-~8'1
,-z-11- tN
.B
12.-1'-f-g'+-
5-17-SS
/_() 'd!hi.5
/3
. (pl
.E
lt,-ZJ '87 E
S-S-8~
'-" (,. &&

l.f -17 a't
..5'2..
1:,
.JJ
lP't
. 70
..ss
3 lo
tA.
l.PL./-
Lf><
.80
LA
/. OL
l.'t8
/.),).
LA
6'~ .
/~ 8.5
.s~
4-7
LA
I .17
l,1
1./(p
'\
Lf\
3~1)-ql)
J)
3-?..J-f}J
. 3-,
(~ &
3-Z3-JL
, Sl
3-1793
58
I..A
3'2 b -9'1-
.!
, 0-L-
LA
_log
. &3
3-l/-95'
!5
B
. 50
'-A
S:(j,
s-f
.50
if- 3-%
:<;-2.7 - 97
\NIT
REMARKS
R~~o Wt11~-
.9 3
/, 09
31
<
>...j
ld q
II l 8
U\
lp.
'
.Sl
'-----
. S+
"'
4c.
-

TEST LEAD
I \7'']
INSULATOR
El-luRMM..I ST.
DETAIL OF LOCATION
/S- V4Lvc Bo~
mecll~ ~ SJ w. o-f"~
~ -t ~ N ~Lt ~ l~cJ..
DATE
CHECKED
j
I,
I TEST I
MTR .
'lf-JO-OI
I I\\
fo g
I (o-2&-02
{-
J.Ck
II q-!t;-o3
r-
iiJJ-/8-0'/
jlq-2 ]~051 (
;.at
;.;8
I ;, ,q
/NIT
Y\
lJw
_;;v ,
iJu
l/-fc,_ NO
j;J(,.;
~~);1?'1", <
![
jvo~;~ ;Jt
.t
I:,
/(
,,
I'
I I
llP'+
PIS
READINGS
/NIT
il
REMARKS
I I
II
II
I
I,'I
.Ljg
U/f!(E
,I
I
I
IJ
--
I
I
t:} f)
/I
m"l~
f.ro nJu
- -
,,
!I"
.I
il,,
i;
I!.,
,I
:ilj
.,
'
:1
II
I
II
r'
rt
I
-1
il
t!
II'
Ol
!i
lo
II
It I
i
.5o
,,
\.). II,' ~~~~

J
DATE
TEST
CHECKED / MTR
MAP
'
.50
II
II
AREA
':"\-~
II
ISB9
BLA<-t-c
,,
SYSTEM
Eh Y=; .. ~ 5./ 11/li'
I I
~ ;tJ o
CJ
sr:
~tos:w/.\L;:
PIS
.PI-IJ-;: -
tf
'l==
liQ-11-d. r- I ) )( Tt"
if<l-ID
-o 7 F i. I/. ~0
I,
I:;;-//-(') 9,' I F I /. ;q 6ll~~
r I0- 13-\\
~~-1~-!r-?
MEo LUI"\
I
I
AT E o :
CJ~ Q.St
G"REJEJ-J
f F='
INTERFERJ;NCE BONO
D-3
P/S
READINGS .
'-1--(p-oo
c:zr
Page_
il
,I
!i
I
ii
!I
I
I
-<I
II
:i
il
I
!
I
;!
!II
:i
'I"
,,Jl
i:
I
il
!!
']

TESTLEAD I
INSULA TOR I.
vi"
INTERFERENCE BOND I
DETAIL o F Lo cATioN _ _W
~E--=-S_
rc~.l_l:_E:.s
.: ~-n_
;:;-_
;z..._JJf_.-+f --::S-=:::.. =u.;.r-J:.. ; . . :I.:/._e_"_J4_JJ_M_A_
rj-s
DATE
Ar c v ~i3 _. (
TEST
ld'w, of C.uR.~
P/S
Pj S
TEST
!
!'. w.o,
B_lv_o_. _
DATE
Page _ _
I SS3
SYSTEM
~
w.o. 3~'1-z..
AREA
MAP
A-L
35'1-A
P/S
I~CH=E=
C~~D~~
MT=
R ~R=
EA=
DIN=G=
S ?=IN=
IT *=====~~
' ==~~=C=HE=C=
KE=
D~
MT=
R ~R=
~=
O I N=G=
S ~IN=IT~====RE=~~R~
KS==~I
8L4cJ(wnJ
G'Rct~lo-l waJZe,
~~~-~~~~-~9=S~b-+~=8=s~~~~--~~~~~--~~--+-~---+-~-----~~
1- n ... -9&; !:>
. e,(p
<A-
. '3 8
1-1'-\--97
.6&
t..A
,'30
l-l.(r9~
I=
.8
1-Zo -99
7
BB
1-t..f- oo ,:=
.8B
93
.9o
. ..So
2.-Ll-01
8~
4\
LA
lJtA~
'13
/ .03
.qj
1-2(, -o5 ~
.Cfl
/JfAJ
.93
q;
. q;
b====h==h===~==-h=========~====~~====~~========~J
"72? ..5
.-..Qf T~II
II<; I I f:AO
Of 1 oc /\ TION
c=J 1
INSUL ATO
600 E E
c::::J
X 9J'L&fu;a.!Zee
c&f;ew;fbt,c/
.....
INTERFEREN~OND
&r-e1 to'~r ~
I)ATF INSTALLED
AREA
TYPE OF INSULATOR
HOTLINE
r=::J
TYPE OF BONO
DIODE
C::::J
C::=J
I l/\NGED
J-A$:i~-;L_~
'-/
:~
NORTH 1
~--------~--~~----------
.. _ .
........ . .. - - -
-------'---
=-=~
____ - -~~~~~-
- -
A - Agro
OVER
S - Simpson
MFTfR :
M - Miller
- - - .. ----..-----.------.---===....t:....:.:..~~
=
SOLID
. - - = = == =
=-...::..:
- -c::.:.
...=
=
()AlI'
CHFCKED
_/:'2
RF.ST . WIRf:
COM PRES ION
-VOlT
_3 _ _
MAP
-:"
--~-- .83_;_L.G}8_i
=:- -,c-o.:=-=---=====--======-=--== , ~=--=~
-1 -
Ap.-----;-.--s,_~
.,
I'
. I
GLJ ~ELOW GROUND L-~

1
t~sr 1111 u uv ~ -- ______ _ . _.t;r.:Ct:J/'~e Mev>e ___
FORM CP101
/?~
- -- - ------- - -- .. - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
AAOVI CHOU ND
--r- J??9 -7; o .
F.AR
VOLT
PHONE MTR
DATE
EAR VOLT
CHECKED PHONE MTR
!1FAD_INGS
READINGS
=, ~-: . . : . _-:.;:.:....-:-:::::-- - - ::==~--~~~====l====*~~~~=-::.__=--=-==--4==f=-==9=====+===+==:=t=
,3-a-3-:_~,.t. .
._..P:.~ ;i..3
~t~ .c-~ ,~.
~:-13- '05
_1_.3~---+-"' . . . . . . .+,/7} ___ /_:_ _,;< i!._ __ _ ,/3,_ :!.
L=-~0..~_2.5?._ .
r-
l-t+.: ?_o
r=
;; ./..:1___
2-7-o/
r._
2-)2.-0 2
z- 27-o3
.~ ~ . - ) ' I
IJ
.]
j, I 'f.. ..
_ 'A
71
l.tl
LA
'-l -z~ . 01
itt
.!/
. I ' D If
t.-1\
-~ - r-z- B8
J3
81
13
I. o I
/. 6/
LA
LA
_ L-zf-Sc)
3-t 1~ 8~
Q
.._!:- - t 5-
I ,) l_p
It DC)
1-{ 5"- ':;
/ - 1LP - 9Z..
f,
o8
-93
I ,
o5
- -- 1- IY
I. O'f
..B.a-H- _ _j_jJ.:_~_? __
1- rz-9!:?_
- [ - /of - 97
_1-~(o-9 8__
I . o.'3::-:...
f.3
I , o 1.-
38
LA-
'A.
_(:_ -- - /. 05___....._'-A---'D
1-2'/-.95
2.-z ,. cG
r-
__ _.L
J.o'fn _____ --+---'---"--+----r-
22_::.
1- ot
1- I 0
.JJ2b._____--f--"::.=-+----rg ----1-'---=---+ --+-__l_Q_ ___
-+-_ ___:./.~!0.:..____t--:=::--+---+-

FORMCPT01
IS'/ 5
MAP
AREA
-~
--- 1
-- -
LOCATION sKETCH
I"
-" 11/
- 'xrf~fk,
.
I
'
..
NORTH 1
C::::J
I I ANGED
-- c:::=J
COM PRESION
- ---- T_
REST . WIRf:
/v/}~e~, ~r~.
SOLI D
, ... /f'IJM-'
, .... . . . ... 1
_i;!~een
11
. . . ____ ________ - - - ---- -.!..- - -
-------
I- .
I~
-, I
---, OVER 1 ~
'
\t viTi
A Agra
--~>Air
M Miller
I. M FlT~ : J
1
S - Simpson
T Tinker
F.AR
C __ c~:-~~~=~~~~E
--r-- 0-$,1.
- --r
. .. .
VOLT
MTR
- l2.
. /Y?
~---~i:'-l.
--:1385
I
tJ
$
B
:B
3-1'1'8(,
L/-Z:'!.-B1
.R,EAQINGS
/;//___ 1/:f
/,/?.,__ _.
tA
/. 6tf
t1
.ti+
_gq
:B
J3
.98
I.
(J
(, 0 5
B
.b
f, 0 3
9I
t-ll,-91-1 t,-
{-/tf-93
-.
1-I&~"Jt.f
_ _1:_19 -?':?.
1-rz- J~
_g
~-
------
_,fi_ -.
...
99
,:::
/.t>9
tA
F==
/, 0~
...
. .
.
. .
- ---
1__..
{.Joo
;- - -1-
/./3
r
--
.,
J/tJ
Cw,a;
2-27~0_5
r . li?_L_....
p
~--
2- 2'1-oLf
...
JJ~
lJtJ .
- j_ /3 - - -
r..
1)(,./
;,; c(
Z-tl- o (;
'f. z. (i 'I
iX
f ---- ___L/.1./
f- .. .). !~ -- ' f/2
j -lf___tlf_
I -cl,D()j
LA-
--
---/1r---
{,
b
1..:1\, ~91_._.___ _f___ .__L.QJ
/tf
LA
.
.
---- ----
-~
LJ..ic.:..!D
.s-3~/1
J ~q-
Il
LJJ:!,_~
.J/fl
~l"l**
cc
SHOR
TED RE
tA
LA
LA
.-
INIT.
f-:2 'f~o_5
Y1
f,/f-91
READINGS
1-,A
/, o-z..,
l4
LA
/,
I .o-r__ __ _ _ _ __
2::1.2- o;.
/...!\
.q S' ---- -
--/-Z..0-99
------- /-1+-oo
. . - --
2-7- or
.z
1-~Lf- ~o
--
-- - --- - --
._L_ili!__ lt3.,e.
Z-12.. - 88
2-/~
-- - - EAR VOLT
DATE
CHECKED PHONE MTR
- - -SHOR COR
INIT
TED REST
--
--r--
.. --- .
-iJ....~ 8.:;
'3A-"h,a.,
'f_ . - -)J_! Lf_
--- -
f..!\ I
v~
'IJ '1 /
~ ~~ //7~ r: ~v
r
-- r-+
'
171
IL:t:_ _ .
/,II ~
1..
/ J.. -
Ho
~ . ~'1/
f ___ __l)a ~Wf

p
. "'
__...., ~~
r--
-- ---
1--
- f--

TEST lBO
INSULA TOR
Page
[=:J
INTERFERENCE BONO /
iJ!J,:t!60 8 I
.
e.!{)~,
l-5?:/l
SYSTEM
AREA
If-/
i
DATE
TEST
PIS
TEST .
DATE
,.
PIS
MAP
I Y- ~~~
1
1
1
1
j ~CH~EC~KE~D~MTR~~~REA~DFINO=S~INFIT=f==~R~EMAFl~l<S~==iFC;;,;,;HE;,;;;;CKE~D~M,;;,;;TR9=~AEAD~IN;;;,;;OS~
' I~NfT~,=~A~EMA~~AKS~== j
v~'r~e,
wh .'-le
I J -3\ - \J.!~ I .94
T:S
'
7
~~!i 1/'-&~/131
t ~~~~4::
{11j~:=FF =~~&~
=A:.=========:====:=:=====~ =~~!=========:
It lfB9:=:E.
IIlii. .
!i P).-~7
~~~
J4~1~
P
-+
! r
/,~
1b~
~~4
~1--------~r---~~--~~~~~---------- ,
~~---4--~----+--4------------~~----~-r----~--~-----------
l:
1
[
I
i.'
:I
lj
"
i
I
:
I
I
.,
!
I
'
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'
I
I
I
!
I.
I
I
I
I
'
'
PENSA COLA GAS SE RVICE

CATH ODIC PROTECTIO N TEST RE CORD
1r.~~.~
c=J
TEST LEA D
1 f. trH
c.w.o. /So9
J / S ~ I~JT(RHHENCf
FOf?M CP !Ol
W. o. 3o 8 1
GO ND
.-J
SYS TE M
'IM?.._Y'tJQ~_t'tA P.~ - - ~-' w. LW-R-L--~-.f._ _____

c ~t: L.TEN I-IAI-1
PC..
At Cu c.
/8 5' w.. ~_r)_:f__cj~ _a-__t _
TA IL OF LO CAT ION
_ ____________ __
-
- - - - -
r... SOVE
--
GROUND
JST ALL ED BY _:
.=._ _ _
____ --~!t~ L+e_(!h~~ __ f_!..-_ ___ _
;.\ TE INST A LL ED _ ___ _ ~-_!:{:
< ~ I I
MAP
--
--
i-+5
- - -
--
LOCATION SKETCH
' l . 'J I J
-'
- --
-- / r -.
I
I __
.=
o ====
"(J
TYPE OF BOND
NORTH 1
DI OUf
A NGED - -
c::J
RES I Wlnf
JMPRESSION -
c::J
SOlID
}'
- rt- .
--
TYPE OF INSULATOR
JTLINE - - ---
c=:::J
1----
A-\
_
-- -
[_-=:J
--~--C,_ RoE. ::c;:
AREA
------------- -
-T.-t,--s---,-i:ij_~Js'-{Jc. o~1/Jf<..m;~;;.;i 7>{.'
WJ.I,n;;
: ST
ETER :
DATE
HECK ED
~JB ~~-f=~=f w- o~ -~Arz rt1ou-r_H t(_,
A - A gr a
M M il ler
TE ST
MTR
PIS
S imr~on
r~~'!:; -~- --~~~~:;~~s
REA DINGS
\AJ~ITI~
3-11- ~~
Y.~tCf- ~
j
y~..,_;<' --
_7 -f.
//
'.,
'H
!~
3-4--~
'
,h
__<f:_- ---
;'
~k_ __
rl
I
.;
:-1'-+ )', ...,)

J
11
.as
t.f /1 ~- ~1
1)
/- 9-5~
.8_?!_______
-'Y_ /": - -"

.:
... )i
.85
' ~~
(--nq() g
'
H
~
-'
)-N~
1-13-93
J)
/-t3-9i-
-~-/ ?(/
--
1--
e?
...
---
'3-~W1'fl( (,o~l;
.89
~{-it
I.- - -
-~~tI
LA
!--' ~-
-- -
--
------ -
-----
-----------
----
_LA__
/ j
----- -----
....
---
--- -- - - -
_lA_. ------- - ----
!---- - -
LA.
----------
- -
------
--~- - ---
L4
-~f) _
..:B
f\ E1\1 ARKS
..
!.A
-. ~--- ____:__') -----
'-A-
JS _______,__~l - --- ~lfr_

1-15"- 9
!---- -- ~,::: - --- - !~--- r-- l.A. ~-2_:_? 9
,:;l - - ,_9 7 --- - LA
1- / 0-0
-- -- - ----- o
---
1 r~1
1==-=
1-lo-9/
- - --
- - - -- LA
,,j
--~8
-~~--+--L~-/-~- ----- - --~
JC, s
~~ -~.- ~R....__.;,>J3-~~t&=
- ==
~~-
1-11 9f~-
---
:S o
,.,
.
'
)
G4- -
------
rt S T
1-tl- ';)"!:
----------
.~+
-- ~f~E:TKE
"'. l '==--~-=-==~
'-
'1)
T I'"""'
--
J -2_t-f-_ (Jj
l r= l- --C)_fo.
031 r-
-95
.0_/
- ---+
--
-~=1~
c;,tt
----
I L__a_ ___ - F______ , _r;_~--
L 'L!J_
0
9a
~~-.1'- f --~~ --~:227
/_:_}__{__)
)-
..
'
) l_ ----
--
);t!J
j' l l
-?t-)
- -- - _14~
.-19
.C;.J
- --
~ : -!--- -~jl,
I
...J-.~-----
t.,4
-----
--r~
-90
2-9- - -- --o 'I ' ,c

~ -tI
-~5 ----
U_-0
1 ___ . BB
F"
l-Liu2 j r
r~_,:JQ-
-------
_i).;
Plf
f (Jj,,
(?
I

TEST LEAD
[Z_J
DETAIL OF LOCATION
INSULA TOR
c.=:2J
Page _ _
INTERFERENCE BONO l_____!
W
=-:.;e=-$=-1'"!..-:$:: . !1/0:..:RC~::..
. : ~Oil~.-+~-'--M-'--1
Ct__:
l/c:_
, _4::._
\J__:E:.....!':.___ _ __
_____
SYSTEM
l~'f3
OA TE
I TEST I
P/S
MTR
READINGS
CHECKED I
,.
1
INIT
PIS
I.J'Z-
!i 5-2 -or i
r-
LA !
Let
I.
o~
,~D
J./D
l-13
'1-?.noz ! r-
/. 2'-/
/.09
! 1 ~ -5-o 3 i ~
/.21
/.10
iJ
il 4-rt-o , r
/. 07
1
I. Of..,
!/
DATE
!J
CHECKED
I TEST j
f
MTR
P!S
READINGS
AREA
MAP
8-3
u-S"o
i
' INrT
REMARKS
-/ e .5 ,y - J7;9 77o;;.;
P F N~ :'\(CI !:A G!l.S SE: RVI C: E
CATH!)Di c- PnOl ECTION TEST RECORD
#o?
NOflTHI
I.
I .
1
I
OVER
- - . - - - - - - - - - - ------- .. ... ---------- -----~~- -
rr: N~:\J.()!A GA.S SERVICE

CA THODW f'R()l ECTION TEST RECORD
II ANGED
c~
..
COMPAFS IOtJ
=-=.::: -
nrs1
c.-~ J
~;O l
II J
L..:: J
....
::.-:::.:...=.=...=. -=-----__,: ";".,;._-;_;._- : =~
-.
TES T LEAD COLOR CODE
d!( .,t.a,
'
r-- --
c:~J
VJif il
NORTH '
pJ
I 5~
~~
~f
I'
lj/fO -
,., ,, ~.
" - - _!;1
,.\ (
,'
~:-"~_-J3
r ~~~
.'
A Ag11
MFHn
MMilltu
~ti~-J;~~
& Simpaon
- 2}'""' --" __,:-~: ..

VOI.T
l M TR
-;::
1\-1.-3-8 v .____
-tc:./~u
'+-
85
- ---
. :.:... .:z~
~-'
.:::;:; :
ft'f
:!;
[.1.0 .
--
--
-- - ..
';- f
_.;
--=-~: -~ :--: .::.:
==--~':'r. - :: .L
..
?.-lvr'l'f
Lf-8- o5
+Yt,[ ___J_ _ [5:':-/0
t> .;.
l-73-9;-1
_
_. __J
/ , -..
- -f-
1:&,_____ ~__!:_ _ _ ._.LlL _ _ -~-
- -,:: .
I ,of
LA
- --
-()
flEADINGS
.
I Nil
, ~=.-~~
"' i
SHOR
t~,
TED R~~
b~-~
- -
IF
, 9g
/.0 2
jju;
)JtJ
IF
/0/
/Jw
/.Od
IF
/. tJ I
/Jr_,j
L1tJ
IF\
(-
(--
~ 1~ _
IIJ- II J'
_IF
/~ df
/. ():J
{0 ~
/()!
-
.
........
~J C
,.
~ wf
l!:h~
~~\
_1\ '?.t
~q~
:11/
Lj
/,00
_,
[Gil
k'jjf~ ~~
; or!
I
-~
tr.r::
~~~T
I
tA-
J:v'4:;~
Lf.j_) Jlf
__OVER
_...
/,I 0
; J- ;:~~ - t ~~
1
....
I.e~JG- Q_
l.L_ F
l-1-1-9[
' {,/7..- i '-A.
~ ~
I
:p-r,
:~--~:-~-;
Js
,
- "r2-1.1-.::?t. !
-- . . . ... ,
' -- ---- ___ J D q__ - -- -
z..-r.lP -93 __.L __
8
/ ,f7
i l,4 1.
/-).3-j(J
p
. r -- -- - ...... - - -- - .1 .
__:;:;....~_..:.._-
..
4't
LA-i
LA
13 _jJ_Q_ __
..- -- _.f:.J_~_ ---. i ..LA ~.r~
;,
1.05
4,?fl-o2 -
j_ tfj,_~.
r;;.
IF
to-5-o3
1-[5-o'f
..
r-
5-2- Of
/, 1..-Cl _
~-
(0,_j_
J-.~ ~ ~---
I'- - ! B
.:__
_L. '? ~. ___
..
-----
- --- -
3 - '0 -99
z.-z.+-o o
_l27
ILl
01\1 [
fldi :vot.T
flE ST CHECK D 11 HCH4l 1 MTH
s _ L_ __ ..l8. .l .___
J(
"3
. ..
'
\- --
-- ------- -- - --
I'-IIOH
. -- CUll
-- --
Vl
---
_jJ!!J
/. D 'Y
.L
----3-/o-B&
-.
..:1::~~:~ . ':"'.']':':
J~
5-""l.l- 8"1 '
- ------ --- --
~I lr-
I .
\f)
VOil
I
I
'
hl
..
-~
()
1-
11
~~
~~
8'
su
,' {/5 \ ~~~~.
-- -----
--1- -,.... ~~.

I
$'.:
11-
~~
-~

I
TEST LEAD
/j
r,fs-
.--------.,
INSULATOR~
l___j
INTERFERENCE BOND
MuLoooAJ 7?o,
13Lvc AI-IG~(..
I
13,/f (r: . VAl-we ~or)
DETAIL OF LOCATION
Page_
V4(v,:;:
PKy.
SYSTEM
1985
AREA
DATE
CHECKED
TEST
MTR
I!
j1
,,I. Ll- 15~99
I~ I
r,
l 8-+-35> I' Fi!
ljI ~-3-oo
!Bl.... u<wlll d
1,4-\J I~
17$
I .LP~
iI
/I Z..'t
I
I f-
l,c I
il r,-26-o2 I r- I
/.29
/.3 /
li q/ts>o!JI f
II,,
41
I/ J.9
I.Ltitl
;l 5J\~ -Df<" I F IJ3 D
wo I
h::/1
loli/f
I
:17oZ 7-f') a i F i f ;;_q
i!l;j-/, -JD If I /._ :SnZ ~ I
1r
i'.k~~ ~J /
!!8-\~-D- 1it'
:iq-Qo---~
:12-1;;. . 1ul
!1
..
;i
iI
:!
I
I
:I
I
---- I
I
I
,j,,
!
I'I
:J
I
I
~I
:I
I
!
:II
!j"
I
I
I'
I
ii
I
I
'
:i
.I
,,
II
I!
'I
II
ii
iI
:!
!I
i!
J!
tl
Iil
I
I
)'/ecd>'c. ~ ~ e- li
I
I J?e u wg Ktt a ,
;j
--
I
I
iI
;!
.!
.!
I
i
'
1
j
'
I
I
I
'
"
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
I
-
II
I
I
,,
---
:!
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
!
iI
:'
'i
I'
:j
iI
II
II
ij
I r
I
I
I
I
:
i
'
REMARKS
I
!
i
I'
I INJT
PIS
READINGS
:I
/i
I
Ii
i
!
II
if
I
!
I
!I
I
I
I
'
I
I
:i
'i
i
I
IR.f'_l
!I
II
:
Ii
'
.,
!r
Fi
{I
11
i \ '7-o.... (k{
! 1 1~ '--~rtA- I'
il:
:
: /.dt
~ ff I
II
l.~t
'I
TEST
MTR
I l.A : BcNoGc
I _LA. I
I /.10! I,,
II
DATE
CHECKED
. UJI\1~
I, 'i~
I /,3D llJw i
l lo-/8.,oY i f I J.,3) l/j01
i! 3.-28-o5i f
i ), 3 ) lbVI
1->?-:m-o(J? 1=-! 1r;) 211C.I
ild f?-- (? .{)17 II
Pl<s
I G~.;:.;N
i! 7-2.3--ol
I
INIT
1l <f-2.- 98 1 ~
I'
P/S
:
READINGS
MAP
I 'R-53
0-ZI
I
I
'
I
'
'
l!
'
!
--
'Is=#/
FORM CPTOT
wo ~ 2CJ (oLf- &;8

c wo-#' 208/
0'"fj
TEST LEAD
DETAIL OF LOCATION
PL
0f
S or
=~--==----
of CoPIER RJJ J- '-/5

ar Pit. ti!ARJ<8
L_
GR OUND
3-18"-03
FLANGED .. -.- .
c:::J
--
COMPRESSION- -
--
GRG/If WJRE'
c=J
-c d fN
M - Miller
TEST
DATE
CHECKED MTR
-TYPE OF BOND
DIODE
--- - -- --
/JW
GR[[!J WJR
r:
7-'~!-o'/
f l lf- t;
)!_eli
. - /.~ -oCJ
p
}=
-J({ -Jb
)~:;' \
1
~-:11 - '
r=
- -
d~
;.29
/.31
/.Jw
zs
LJJ.
/, ']q
(,30
/. ~~ 3
/)CJ
- - - - --
--
coP,/ER
1
~--J_ "f,t;:
..
I
2" (3LJ ( . ' wRf.
1-
l -'-f5 ~
I..
Ro.
l~
:q-~'Is
'
.I
DATE
CHECKED
P/S
READINGS
TEST
MTR
I NIT
REMARKS
'I
,,
I,
(I
rR
Jl
Jl~
II
---
6 14
/I
r'> ~/
W-H
II
lS i
{ (
..
NORTH'
-- -
T Tinker
1.30
/.31
1'
/
.: ~--
'
REMARKS
-6-o5
-12,-0 lo
INIT
'
- r --
:Xt _
--
"
rt-
tp"
1)/f_:).._ "___
S - Simpson
- \,.
w I
c=J
SOLID -
11
c=J
RES T Wif1E
..
'~,'
'
I
5_ I
--
c=J
P/S
READINGS
2-9rOL(
r-
MAP
A-1. X-LfLf
A- Agra
11
v
-- - -
'
AREA
LOCATION SKETCH
c::=J
- - - -- -----
,__....,
r"
. ;;..___ 1------.----
ED
TYPE OF INSULATOR
HOTLINE- -- - -- - - . c:=J
(-
SYSTEM
-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -. .. --------- :-- - ----- .. ------ --- -- .

. -- ..---- -==--=----~,---c-:-::====-=
- -- .. . . ---- -.- , --. ---I
DATE INSTALL ED
3-}8,03
'Is
ABOVE GROUND
INSTALLED BY ____ L__C{)_E_"____________ _ __ ______
TEST
METER
c=J
INTERFERENCE BOND
Cj
OF DI1V/5 1-IWY.
--
40
S IS
r::=J
INSULATOR
I
i
I
I
PHMSA Pipeline Drug & Alcohol Questions

Instructions
1. Use in conjunction with Unit inspections
2. Interview the primary operator contact for the Unit inspection you are conducting and enter their responses. Do
not request the operator substance abuse expert to provide responses to these questions.
3. Send completed form to stanley.kastanas@dot.gov
Name of Operator
Inspector
Date of Inspection
Inspection Location City & State
Pensacola, Energy Services of

Robert Simpson, Hassan Badran, Farhan
Alnajar
8/3/ 15-8/14/15
OpiD#
Unit#
Pensacola, Florida
Operator Employee Interviewed Bonnie Hoffman

Phone#
Positionffitle Regulatory Compliance Mana_ger
Operator Designated Employer Representative (DER),
Kristy Wilson, City Nurse
(a.k.a. Substance Abuse Program Manager)
DER Phone#
850-324-1838
j 850-4J5-1726
199
.3, .101
.201, .245
4475
Pipeline Safety Regulations Drug and Alcohol Testing

I.
Does the company have a plan for drug and alcohol testing of employees and
contractors performing, or ready to perform, covered functions of operations,
maintenance, and emergency response?
Yes
No
Does
Not
Know
./
Comments
.3
. 105(c)
.225(b)
2. Does the company perform random drug testing and reasonable suspicion
drug and alcohol testing of employees performing covered functions? For
random drug testing, enter the number of times per year employees are
selected and the number of employees in each selection in Comments below.
./
Comments
.3
. 105(b)
3.
Does the company conduct post-accident/incident drug and alcohol testing

for employees who have caused or contributed to the consequences of an
accident/incident? Enter the position/title of the employee who would make
the decision to conduct post-accident/incident testing_ in Comments below.
./
Comments
.1 13(c)
.117(a)(4)
.227(b)(2)
.24 1
Comments
4.
.3
. 113(b)
.117(a)(4)
.239(b)(ll)
Comments
5.
Does the company provide training for supervisors on the detection of

potential drug abuse (minimum 60 minutes) and alcohol misuse (minimum
60 minutes)?
Does the company give covered employees an explanation of the drug &
alcohol policies and distribute information about the Employee Assistance
Program, including a hotline number? Provide details in Comments below .
Fonn 13 PHMSA Pipeline Drug & Alcohol Questions (Rev. 03/22/1 1 through Final Ru le of 1/16/2009).
./
./
1 02/17/09
PHMSA (OQ) Inspection Form 14 (Rev.6) December 15,2008
OPERATOR INSPECTION-SPECIFIC INFORMATION

Inspection Date(s):
Name of Operator:
OPS Operator ID:
State/Other ID:
H.Q. Address:
1625 Atwood Drive
Pensacola, FL 32514
Web
Site:
8/3/15 through 8/14/15

4475
Florida
Company Officer:
Title:
Phone Number:
Fax Number:
Email Address:
www.pensacolaenergy.com
Employees Covered by OQ Plan:

Contractors Covered by OQ Plan:
Total Mileage Represented:
Bonnie Hoffman
Regulatory & Compliance
Manager
(850) 474-5305
(850) 474-5331
bhoffman@cityofpensacola.com
76
0
1606
Persons Interviewed
Title
Bonnie Hoffman
Regulatory &
Compliance Manager
Phone
Number
(850) 4745305
Email Address
To add rows, press TAB wllh cursor m last cell.
OPS/State Representatives
Robert Simpson
Hassan Badran
Farhan Alnajar
Region/State
Southern/Florida
Southern/Florida
Southern/Florida
To add rows, press TAB wllh cursor m last cell.
Remarks:
PHMSAFonn-14 (192.801 , 195.501) Operator Qualification Inspection Form, Rev 6 (Rev. 03/22/2011 ).
-I-
PHMSA (OQJ Inspection Form 14 (Rev.6) December 15,2008
Mileage Covered by OQ Plan (by Company and State)

List each company and subsidiary separately, broken down by state (using 2-/etter designation). If a company has intrastate
and/or interstate mileage in several states, use one row per state. If there are both gas and liquid lines, use both the first and
second table. For small gas operators (e.g. master meter, LP), use the third table.
Jurisdictional to Part 192 (Gas) Mileage

Company
(Gas Operator)
Pensacola, Energy Services Of
Operator
ID
State
4475
FL
interstate
Gathering
Intrastate
Gathering
Interstate
Transmission
Intrastate
Transmission
Interstate
Distribution'
Intrastate
Distribution'
Remarks
1606
(To add rows, press TAB w1th cursor 1n last cell.)
Jurisdictional to Part 195 (Hazardous Liquid) Mileage

Company
(Liquid Operator)
Operator
ID
Stale
Interstate
Transmission
Intrastate
Transmission
Remarks
Jurisdictional to Part 192 (Gas) Mileage- Small Operators

Company
(Small Gas Operator)
Operator
10
Slate
Small Gas
(e.g., master meter)'
LP'
Remarks
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Supply company name and Operator 10, if not the master operator from the first page (i.e. , for subsidiary companies).
Use OPS-assigned Operator 10. Where not applicable, leave blank or enter n/a.
Use only 2-letter state codes in column #3, e.g., TX for Texas.
Enter number of applicable miles in all other columns. (Only positive values. No need to enter 0 or n/a.)
* Please do not include Service Line footage. This should only be MAINS.
PHMSAForm-14 ( 192.80 1, 195.501) Operator Qualification Inspection Form, Rev 6 (Rev. 03/22/20t 1).
-2-
l -Document Program Plan, Implementing Ptocedures and Qualification Criteria

1.01 Application and Customization of "Off-the-Shelf' Programs
Does the operator' s plan identify covered tasks and does it specify task-specific reevaluation intervals
for individuals performing covered tasks? (Associated Protocols: 1.05, 2.01, 5.02)
No Issues Identified
Inspection Notes:
Potential Issues Identified (explain)
N/A (explain)
Not Inspected
Check exactly one box above.
1.02 Contractor Qualification

Does the operator employ contractor organizations to provide individuals to perfom1 covered tasks?
If so, what are the methods used to qualify these individuals and how does the operator ensure that
contractor individuals are qualified in accordance with the operator's OQ program plan?
*Verify that the operator's written program includes provisions that require all contractor and
subcontractor individuals be evaluated and qualified prior to performing covered tasks, unless the
covered task is performed by a non-qualified individual under the direction and observation of a
qualified individual. (Associated Protocols: 1.05, 2.02, 3.02)
~ No Issues Identified
Inspection Notes:
D Potential Issues Identified (explain)

D N/A (explain)
D Not Inspected
1.03 Management of Other Entities Performing Covered Tasks

Has the operator' s OQ program included provisions that require individuals from any other entity
perfonning covered task(s) on behalfofthe operator (e.g., through mutual assistance agreements) be
evaluated and qualified prior to task performance?
* Verify that other entities that perform covered task( s) on behalf of the operator are addressed under
the operator's OQ program and that individuals from such other entities performing covered tasks on
behalf of the operator are evaluated and qualified consistent with the operator's program
requirements. (Associated Protocols: 1.05, 2.02)
cgj No Issues Identified
Inspection Notes:

D N/A (explain)
D Not Inspected
PHMSAForm-14 (192 .801 , 195.501) Operator Qualification Inspection Form, Rev 6 (Rev. 03/22/2011).
-3-
PHMSA (OQJ Inspection Form 14 (Rev.6) December 15,2008

1.04 Training Requirements (Initial Qualification, Remedial if Initial Failure, and Reevaluation)
Does the operator's OQ program plan contain policy and criteria for the use of training in initial
qualification of individuals performing covered tasks, and are criteria in existence for re-training and
reevaluation of individuals if qualifications are questioned? (Associated Protocols: 5.02)
Inspection Notes:
[ ] Potential Issues Identified (explain)
D N/A (explain)
l JNot Inspected
1.05 Written Qualification Program

Did the operator meet the OQ Rule requirements for establishing a written operator qualification
program and completing qualification of individuals petforming covered tasks?
*Verify that the operator's written qualification program was established by April27, 2001.
*Verify that the written qualification program identified all covered tasks for the operator's
operations and maintenance functions being conducted as of October 28, 2002.
*Verify that the written qualification program established an evaluation method(s) to be used in the
initial qualification of individuals performing covered tasks as of October 28, 2002.
* Verify that all individuals performing covered tasks as of October 28, 2002, and not otherwise
directed or observed by a qualified individual were qualified in accordance with the operator's written
qualification program. (Associated Protocols: 3.01, 7.01)
Inspection Notes:
D N/A (explain)
D Not Inspected
PHMSAForm-14 (192.801, 195.501) Operator Qualification Inspection Form, Rev 6 (Rev. 03/22/2011).
-4-
2 - Identify Covered Tasks and Related Evaluation Methods

2.01 Development of Covered Task List
How did the operator develop its covered task list?
*Verify that the operator applied the four-part test to determine whether 49 CFR Part 192 or 49 CFR
Part 195 O&M activities applicable to the operator are covered tasks.
*Verify that the operator has identified and documented all applicable covered tasks. (Associated
Protocols: 8.01)
Inspection Notes:
D N/A (explain)
D Not Inspected
2.02 Evaluation Method(s) (Demonstration of Knowledge, Skill and Ability) and

Relationship to Covered Tasks
Has the operator established and documented the evaluation method(s) appropriate to each covered
task?
*Verify what evaluation method(s) has been established and documented for each covered task.
*Verify that the operator's evaluation program ensures that individuals can perform assigned covered
tasks.
* Verify that the evaluation method is not limited to observation of on-the-job performance, except
with respect to tasks for which OPS has determined that such observation is the best method of
examining or testing qualifications. The results of any such observations shall be documented in
writing. (Associated Protocols: 3.01, 3.02)
C8J No Issues Identified
Inspection Notes:
D N/A (explain)
D Not Inspected
PHMSAForm-14 (192.801 , 195.501) Operator Qualification Inspection Form, Rev 6 (Rev. 03/22/2011).
-5-

2. 03 Planning for Mergers and Acquisitions (Due Diligence re: Acquiring Qualified Individuals)
Does the operator have a process for managing qualifications of individuals perfonning covered tasks
during program integration following a merger or acquisition (applicable only to operators engaged in
merger and acquisition activities)?
*Verify that the OQ program describes the process for ensuring OQ qualifications, evaluations, and
performance of covered tasks during the merger with or acquisition of other entities. (Associated
Protocols 3.01 3.02)
k8J No Issues Identified
Inspection Notes:
D N/A (explain)
[ ] Not Inspected
PHMSAForm-14 (192.801 , 195.501) Operator Qualification Inspection Form, Rev 6 (Rev . 03/2212011).
- 6-
3 -Identify Individuals Performing Covered Tasks

3. OJ Development/Documentation ofAreas of Qualification for Individuals Performing Covered
Tasks
Does the operator's program document the evaluation and qualifications of individuals performing
covered tasks, and can the qualification of individuals performing covered tasks be verified?
* VerifY that the operator's qualification program has documented the evaluation of individuals
performing covered tasks.
* VerifY that the operator's qualification program has documented the qualifications of individuals
performing covered tasks. (Associated Protocols: 4.02, 7.01)
Inspection Notes:
D N/A (explain)
D Not Inspected
Check exactly_ one box above.
3. 02 Covered Task Performed by Non-Qualified Individual

Has the operator established provisions to allow non-qualified individuals to perform covered tasks
while being directed and observed by a qualified individual, and are there restrictions and limitations
placed on such activities?
* VerifY that the operator's program includes provisions for the performance of a covered task by a
non-qualified individual under the direction and observation by a qualified individual. (Associated
Protocols: 2.01, 2.02)
Inspection Notes:

D N/A (explain)
D Not Inspected
PHMSAFonn-14 (192.801 , 195.501) Operator Qualification Inspection Form, Rev 6 (Rev. 03/22/2011).
- 7-
4 - Evaluate and Qualify Individuals Performing Covered Tasks

4.01 Role of and Approach to "Work Performance History Review"
Does the operator use work performance history review as the sole method of qualification for
individuals performing covered tasks prior to October 26, 1999, and does the operator's program
specify that work performance history review will not be used as the sole method of evaluation for
qualification after October 28, 2002?
*Verify that after October 28, 2002, work performance history is not used as a sole evaluation
method.
* Verify that individuals beginning work on covered tasks after October 26, 1999 have not been
qualified using work performance history review as the sole method of evaluation. (Associated
Protocols: 2.02)
[8J No Issues Identified
Inspection Notes:

D N/A (explain)
D Not Inspected
4.02 Evaluation of Individual's Capability to Recognize and React to AOCs

Are all qualified individuals able to recognize and react to AOCs? Has the operator evaluated and
qualified individuals for their capability to recognize and react to AOCs? Are the AOCs identified as
those that the individual may reasonably anticipate and appropriately react to during the performance
of the covered task? Has the operator established provisions for communicating AOCs for the
purpose of qualifying individuals?
* Verify that individuals performing covered tasks have been qualified in recognizing and reacting to
AOCs they may encounter in performing such tasks. (Associated Protocols 3.01)
Inspection Notes:

N/A (explain)
Not Inspected
PHMSAForm-14 (192.801, 195.501) Operator Qualification Inspection Form, Rev 6 (Rev. 03/22/2011).
-8-
5 - Continued/Periodic Evaluation of Individuals Performing Covered Tasks

5.01 Personnel Performance Monitoring
Does the operator's program include provisions to evaluate an individual if the operator has reason to
believe the individual is no longer qualified to perform a covered task based on: covered task
performance by an individual contributed to an incident or accident; other factors affecting the
performance of covered tasks?
* VerifY that the operator's program ensures re-evaluation of individuals whose performance of a
covered task may have contributed to an incident or accident.
*VerifY that the operator has established provisions for determining whether an individual is no
longer qualified to perform a covered task, and requires reevaluation.
(Specific Protocols: 2.02)
Inspection Notes:

D N/A (explain)
D Not Inspected
5. 02 Reevaluation Interval and Methodology for Determining the Interval

Has the operator established and justified requirements for reevaluation of individuals performing
covered tasks?
*VerifY that the operator has established intervals for reevaluating individuals performing covered
tasks . (Associated Protocols: None)
Inspection Notes:

D N/A (explain)
D Not Inspected
PHMSAFonn-14 (192.801 , 195.501) Operator Qualification Inspection Form, Rev 6 (Rev. 03/22/20 11).
-9-
6 -Monitor Program Performance; Seek Improvement Opportunities

6.01 Program Performance and Improvement
Does the operator have provisions to evaluate performance of its OQ program and implement
improvements to enhance the effectiveness of its program?
(Associated Protocols: None)
Inspection Notes:

N/A (explain)
Not Inspected
PHMSAForm-14 (192.801 , 195.501) Operator Qualification Inspection Form, Rev 6 (Rev. 03/22/201 1).
-10-
7- Maintain Program Records

7.01 Qualification "Trail"(i.e., covered task; individual performing; evaluation method(s);
continuing performance evaluation; reevaluation interval; reevaluation records)
Does the operator maintain records in accordance with the requirements of 49 CFR 192, subpart N,
and 49 CFR 195, subpart G, for all individual s performing covered tasks, including contractor
individuals?
*Verify that qualification records for all individuals performing covered tasks include the
information identified in the regulations.
* Verify that the operator's program ensures the retention of records of prior qualification and records
of individuals no longer performing covered tasks for at least five years.
* Verify that the operator's program ensures the availability of qualification records of individuals
(employees, contractors and third party entities) currently performing covered tasks, or who have
previously performed covered tasks. (Associated Protocols: 1.05, 3.01)
Inspection Notes:

D N/A (explain)
D Not Inspected
PHMSAForm- 14 ( 192.801 , 195.501) Operator Qualification Inspection Form, Rev 6 (Rev. 03/22/2011 ).
- Jl-
8 - Manage Change
8.01 Management of Changes (to Procedures, Tools, Standards, etc.)
Does the operator's OQ program identify how changes to procedures, tools standards and other
elements used by individuals in performing covered tasks are communicated to the individuals,
including contractor individuals, and how these changes are implemented in the evaluation
method(s)?
* Verify that the operator's program identifies changes that affect covered tasks and how those
changes are communicated, when appropriate, to affected individuals.
* Verify that the operator's program identifies and incorporates changes that affect covered tasks.
* Verify that the operator's program includes provisions for the communication of changes (e.g., who,
what, when, where, why) in the qualification program to the affected individuals.
*Verify that the operator incorporates changes into initial and subsequent evaluations.
*Verify that contractors supplying individuals to perform covered tasks for the operator are notified
of changes that affect task performance and thereby the qualification ofthese individuals.
(Associated Protocols 1.04)
[8] No Issues Identified
Inspection Notes:

D N/A (explain)
D Not Inspected
8.02 Notification of Significant Program Changes

Does the operator have a process for identifying significant OQ written program changes and
notifying the appropriate regulatory agency of these changes once the program has been reviewed?
*Verify that the operator's written program contains provisions to notify OPS or the appropriate
regulatory agency of significant modifications to a program that has been reviewed for compliance.
(Associated Protocols: None)
[8] No Issues Identified
Inspection Notes:

D N/A (explain)
D Not Inspected
1. Wholesale changes made to an OQ Plan or Program, whether due to an overall effort to
improve program performance, or due to a merger or acquisition that results in
incorporating the best features of the competing plans and programs.
2. Recommend the operator send a letter to accompany the program that addresses the
changes made to the program. The official notification should be addressed to
headquarters.
PHMSAFonn-14 (192.801 , 195.501) Operator Qualification Inspection Form, Rev 6 (Rev. 03/22/2011).
-12-
9 -Field Inspection Findings
Additional Inspection Notes
PHMSAForm-14 (192.801 , 195.501) Operator Qualification Inspection Form, Rev 6 (Rev. 03/2212011).
-13-
PHMSA (OQJ Field Inspection Form 15 (Rev. 4) May 17, 2007)
OPERATOR QUALIFICATION
FIELD INSPECTION PROTOCOL FORM
Inspection Date(s): 8/3115 through 8/14115
Name of Operator: Pensacola, Energy Services of
Operator Il> (OPID): 4475
Inspection Location(s): Pensacola, FL
Supervisor(s) Contacted: Shawn Harris
#Qualified Employees Observed: 7
# Qualified Contractors Observed: 0
Title/Organization
Phone
Number
Email Address
Trevor Jackson
Field Services Leader
850-324-1841
NA
Kerry G Welford
Corrosion Services
Leader
850-791-5279
NA
Rick Bradley
Field Services Worker
NA
NA
John Picheo Jr.
850-393-0678
NA
John Durnil
850-324-9752
NA
Preston Ramsey
850-336-0397
NA
Rodney Havard
850-324-1837
NA
Individual Observed
To add rows, press TAB with cursor in last cell.
PHMSA/State Representative
Region/State
Email Address
Robert Simpson
Southern/Florida
rsimpson @psc.state.tl.us
Hassan Badran
Southern/ Florida
hbadran@ psc.state.tl .us
Farhan Alnajar
Southern/Florida
falnajar@ psc.state. tl.us

Remarks :
A table for recording specific tasks performed and the individuals who performed the tasks is on the last
page of this form. This form is to be uploaded on to the OQBD for the appropriate operator, then imported
into the file .
PHMSAForm-1 S (192.801, 195.50 I) Operator Qualification Field Inspection Protocol 9, Rev. 4 (Rev. 03/21 /2011).
-1-
PHMSA (OQ) Field Inspection Form 15 (Rev. 4) May 17, 2007)

9.01 Covered Task Performance
Verify the qualified individuals performed the observed covered tasks in accordance with the
operator's procedures or operator approved contractor procedures.
9.01 Inspection Results
(type an X in exactly one cell below)
Inspection Notes
No Issue Identified
Potential Issue Identified (explain)
N/A (explain)
Not Inspected
9. 02 Qualification Status
Verify the individuals performing the observed covered tasks are currently qualified to perform the
covered tasks.
Inspection Notes
No Issue Identified
N/A (explain)
Not Inspected
9.03 Abnormal Operating Condition Recognition and Reaction
Verify the individuals performing covered tasks are cognizant of the AOCs that are applicable to
the tasks observed.
Inspection Notes
No Issue Identified
N/A (explain)
Not Inspected
PHMSAForm-15 (192.801, 195 .501) Operator Qualification Field Inspection Protocol 9, Rev. 4 (Rev. 03121 /201 1).
-2-
9. 04 Verification of Qualification
Verify the qualification records are current, and ensure the personal identification of all individuals
performing covered tasks are checked, prior to task performance.
Inspection Notes
No Issue Identified
N/A (explain)
Not Inspected
9. 05 Program Inspection Deficiencies
Have potential issues identified by the headquarters inspection process been corrected at the
operational level?
Inspection Notes
No Issue Identified
N/A (explain)
Not Inspected
PHMSAForm-15 {192.801, 195 .50 I) Operator Qualification Field Inspection Protocol 9, Rev . 4 (Rev. 03121/2011).
-3-
Field Inspection Notes

The following table is provided for recording the covered tasks observed and the individuals
performing those tasks.
Name/ID of Individual Observed

Kerry G. Welford Rick
/Rodney Harvard/ Bradley/John
Preston Ramsey Durnil
No
Task Name
Trevor Jackson
' Correct
Perfonnance
Correct
Perfonnance
Correct
Perfonnance
(YIN)
(YIN)
(YIN)
Cathodic
Protection
Valves
Odorization
Regulator
Station
John Picheo Jr.
Comments
y
y
5
6
7
8
Operations and Maintenance Records Review

If performing an operations and maintenance records review in the course of your inspection,
please review a sample of the qualifications of the individuals performing those O&M tasks that
are covered under Operator Qualification and check the records for compliance to 192.807 or
195.507.
192.807
or
195 .507
Records supporting an individual's current qualifications shall be maintained

while the individual is performing the covered task. Records of prior
qualification and records of individuals no longer performing covered tasks shall
be retained for a period of five years.
Sat. Unsat.
PHMSAFonn-15 (192.801 , 195.501) Operator Qualification Field Inspection Protocol 9, Rev. 4 (Rev. 03/2 1/2011).
-4-
Not
Checked
Comments
I I I I
PHMSAFonn-15 (192.801, 195.501) Operator Qualification Field Inspection Protocol9, Rev. 4 (Rev. 0312112011).
-5-
PHMSA Form 21 Public Awareness Program Effec;tiveness Inspection, July 21, 2011, Rev 0
PUBLIC AWARENESS PROGRAM EFFECTIVENESS INSPECTION

SPECIFIC INFORMATION
Control Information
Inspection Start Date*:
Inspection End Date*:
OpiD:
Parent Operator Name:
Unit ID (s):
State/Other ID:
Activity Record ID No.
Address of Company Official*:
1625 Atwood Drive
Pensacola, FL 32514
Web Site:
Total Milea2e (from pa2e 3)*:
Total Mileage in HCA:
Number of Services (For
Distribution):
Alternate MAOP (80%
Rule):
No. of Special Permits:
8/3/15
8/14115
4475
Florida
Company
Official*:
Title*:
Phone Number*:
Fax Number:
Email Address*:
Safety & Training Coordinator

850-324-1847
NC
sHarris@cityofpensacola.com
www. Qensaco laenergx.com
1606
NC
57877
NA
NA
Initial Date ofPublic Awareness Pro2ram*:

Title of Current PAP*:
Current PAP Version*:
Current PAP Date*:
Date Submitted for Approval:

Director Approval:
Approval Date:
Shawn Harris
10/2006
Pensacola Energy, PAP
3rd
7/2015
Post Inspection Information

8/19/15
*Required field
PHMSA Fonn-21 (192.616, 195.440) Public Awareness Program Effectiveness Inspection, July 21 , 201 I Rev 0.
-I-
PHMSA Form 21 Public Awareness Program Effectiveness Inspection, July 21, 2011, Rev 0
Persons I nterviewed*
Shawn Harris
Title/Or2anization *
Safety & Training
Jill Grove
Coordinator
Marketing Manager
Phone Number
Email Address
850-324-1847
sharris@cityofpensacola.com
850-691-5282
jgrove@cityofpensacola.com
To add rows, press TAB wzth cursor m last cell.
External Support Entity

Name*
Part of Plan and/or

Evaluation*
Phone Number
Chris Gleditch (Quest Fore)
Effectiveness
Evaluation
412-381-6670
Email Address
Inspector
Representative(s)*
PHMSA/State*
Region/State*
Email Address
Robert Simpson
Florida
Southern
rsimpson@psc.state.fl.us
Lead*
I8JY D
UY [8J
N
DY [8J
N
DY D
N
DY D
N
Hassan Badran
Florida
Southern
hbadran@psc.state.tl .us
Farhan Alnajar
Florida
Southern
falnajar@psc.state.fl .us
To add rows, press TA B with cursor in last cell.
* Requiredfield
PHMSA Form-21 (192.616, 195.440) Public Awareness Program Effectiveness Inspection, July 21 , 2011 Rev 0.
-2-
Mileage Covered by Public Awareness Program (by Company and State)

Based on the most recently submitted annual report, list each company and subsidiary separately, broken
down by state (using 2-letter designation). Also list any new lines in operation that are not included on the
most recent annual report. If a company has intrastate and/or interstate mileage in several states, use one
row per state. If there are both gas and liquid lines, use the appropriate table for intrastate and/or
interstate.
Jurisdictional to Part 192

Company Name
(Gas Operator)
Operator
ID
Product
7)pe *
State*
Ga~ Mileage anterstate)

Interstate
flllerstate
Interstate
Gatheri11g
Tiwrs1nission
Distribution
Mileage M
Mileage
Mileage
Remarks (11ew or
inHCAi
...
(l o add rows. press I AB w1th cursor 111 last cei L)
Jurisdictional to Part 192 f_Ga~ Mileage ant.-astate)

Company Name
(Gas Operator)
Pensacola, Energy
Services of
Opera/or
ID
Product
T;pe*
State *
Gas
FL
4475
lntrastale
Gatheri11g
Mileage*
111/rasta/e
Transmission
Mileaf(e *
Intrastate
Distribution
Mileage"*
Remarks (new or
i11 f-ICA)
1606
(To add rows. pro;ss TAB with l:ursor m last celL )
Jurisdictional to Part 195 (Hazardous Liauid) Mileage anterstate

Company Name
(Liquid Operator)
Operator
lD
Product
T;pe *
..
Stale*
lmerstate Tra11smission Mileage*
Remarks (ne11 or
in HCA- )
...
( I o add rows, press I AB w1th cursor m last ceiL)
Jurisdictional to Part 195 (Hazardous Liauid) Mileage antrastate

Company Name
(Liquid Opera/or)
Operator
ID
Product
TJpe *
Srate*
lmmstate Transmission Mileage *
Remarks (new or
ill HCA-j
(1 o add rows, press r.AB w1th cursor 111 last ceiL)
Total Mileage:
1.
2.
3.
4.
1\
I I6o6
Supply company name and Operator ID, if not the master operator rrom the first page (i .e .. for
subsidiary companies).
Use OPS-assigned Operator ID . Where not applicab le, leave blank or enter N /A
Use only 2-letter State codes, e.g. , TX f()r Texas.
Enter number of applicable miles in applicable co lumns. (Only positive values. No need to enter 0 or
N/A.)
Please do not include Service Line footage . Thi s should only be MATNS.
Required Field
Use Total HCA as reported on annual reports.
PHMSA Form-21 (192.616, 195.440) Public Awareness Program Effectiveness Inspection, July 21,2011 Rev 0.
-3-
Please provide a comment or explanation for each inspection question.
1. Administration and Development of Public Awareness Program

1.01 Written Public Education Program
Does the operator have a written cont in uing public education program or public awa reness program
(PAP) in accordance with the general program recommendati ons in the A merican Petroleum
Institute' s (API) Recommended Practice (RP) 11 62 (i ncorporated by reference), by the required date,
except for master meter or petroleum gas system operators?
(Reference: 192.616 (h); 195.440 (h))
Verify the operator has a written public awareness program (PAP).
Review any Clearinghouse deficiencies and verify the operator addressed previous Clearinghouse
deficiencies, if any, addressed in the operator' s PAP.
Identify the location where the operator's PAP is administered and which company personnel is
designated to administer and manage the written program.
Verify the date the public awareness program was initially developed and published.
S- Satisfactory (explain)*
U- Unsatisfactory (explain)*
D N/A- Not Applicable (explain)*

D N/C- Not Checked (explain)*
Comments:
Operator has a written public awareness program;
an individual is identified to administer the
program; PAP was developed in 10/2006.
Check exactly one box above. * Required field
1.02 Management Support

Does the operator's program include a statement of management suppoti (i.e., is there ev idence of a
commitment of participation, resources, and allocation of funding)?
(Reference: 192.616 (a); 195.440 (a); API RP 1162 Section 2.5 and 7.1)
Verify the PAP includes a written statement of management support.
Determine how management participates in the PAP.
Verify that an individual is named and identified to administer the program with roles and
responsibilities .
Verify resources provided to implement public awareness are in the PAP. Determine how many
employees involved with the PAP and what their roles are.
Determine if the operator uses external support resources for any implementation or evaluation
efforts.
~ S - Satisfactory (explain)*
D U- Unsatisfactory (explain)*
[
Comments:
PAP includes funding and resource allocation
requests for the plan established at the level
necessary to implement the plan.
] N/A- Not Applicable (explain)*

N/C - Not Checked (explain)*
1.03 Unique Attributes and Characteristics

Does the operator's program clearly defi ne the specific pipeline assets or systems covered in the
program and assess the unique attributes and characteristics of the pipeline and fac ilities?
(Reference: 192.616 (b); 195.440 (b); API RP 1162 Section 2.7 and Section 4)
Verify the PAP includes all of the operator' s system types/assets covered by PAP (gas, liquid,
HVL, storage fields, gathering lines etc).
PHMSA Form-2 1 ( 192.6 16, 195.440) Publi c Awareness Program Effectiveness Inspection, July 21 , 20 II Rev 0.
-4-
Identify where in the PAP the unique attributes and characteristics of the pipeline and facilities
are included (i.e. gas, liquids, compressor station, valves, breakout tanks, odorizer).
k8J S- Satisfactory (explain)*

Du -Unsatisfactory (explain)*
Comments:
All of the Pensacola Energy's gas pipeline facilities
are included in PAP.
1.04 Stakeholder Audience Identification

Does the operator's program estab lis h methods to ident ify the ind ivi dual stakeholders in the fo ur
affected stakeholder audi ence groups: ( I) affected public, (2) emergency oHicials, (3) local pub lic
offic ials, and (4) excavators, as well as affected mu nicipalities, school di stricts, businesses, and
residents?
(Reference: 192.616 (d), (e), (f); 195.440 (d), (e), (f); API RP 1162 Section 2.2 and Section 3)
Identify how the operator determines stakeholder notification areas and distance on either side of
the pipeline.
Determine the process and/or data source used to identify each stakeholder audience.
Select a location along the operator's system and verify the operator has a documented list of
stakeholders consistent with the requirements and references noted above.
C8J Affected public

C8J Emergency officials
C8J Public officials
C8J Excavators
k8J S - Satisfactory (explain)*

Comments:
Page 4 identifies the stakeholder audiences.
1.05 Message Frequency and Message Delivery

Does the operator's program define the combination of messages, delivery methods, and del ivery
frequ encies to comprehensive ly reach all affected stakeho lder aud iences in all areas in whi ch the
operator transpotts gas, hazardous liqu id, or carbon dioxide?
(Reference: 192.616 (c); 195.440 (c); API RP 1162 Sections 3-5)
Identify where in the operator' s PAP the combination of messages, delivery methods, and
delivery frequencies are included for the followin g stakeholders:
[8] Affected public
C8J Emergency officials

C8J Public officials
C8J Excavators
[8J S- Satisfactory (explain)*
Comments:
Page 6 identifies message type, frequency and
PHMSA Form-21 ( 192.6 16, 195.440) Publi c Awareness Program Effectiveness Inspecti on, July 2 1,2011 Rev 0.
-5-
content.

1. 06 Written Evaluation Plan
Does the operator's program include a written evaluation process that specifies how the operator will
periodically evaluate program implementation and effectiveness? If not, did the operator provide
justification in its program or procedural manual?
(Reference: 192.616 (c), (i); 195.440 (c), (i))
VerifY the operator has a written evaluation plan that specifies how the operator will conduct and
evaluate self-assessments (annual audits) and effectiveness evaluations.
VerifY the operator's evaluation process specifies the correct frequency for annual audits (I year)
and effectiveness evaluations (no more than 4 years apart).
IdentifY how the operator determined a statistical sample size and margin-of-error for stakeholder
audiences' surveys and feedback.
~ S- Satisfactory (explain)*
Comments:
Page 9 specifies how the operator will evaluate the
program implementation using self-assessments or
third party audits or regulatory inspections.
] N/C- Not Checked (explain)*

2. Program Implementation
2. OJ English and other Languages
Did the operator develop and deliver materials and messages in English and in other languages
commonly understood by a significant number and concentration of non-English speaking
populations in the operator's areas?
(Reference: 192.616 (g); 195.440 (g); API RP 1162 Section 2.3.1)
Determine if the operator delivers material in languages other than English and if so, what
languages.
IdentifY the process the operator used to determine the need for additional languages for each
stakeholder audience.
Identify the source of information the operator used to determine the need for additional
languages and the date the information was collected.
] U- Unsatisfactory (explain)*

Comments:
Page 8 of the PAP will be conducted in English and
in other languages commonly understood by a
significant number of non-English speaking
population in the service area.
PHMSA Form-21 (192.616, 195.440) Public Awareness Program Effectiveness Inspection, July 21, 2011 Rev 0.
- 6-
PHMSA Form 21 Public Awareness Program Effectiveness Inspection, July 21,2011, Rev 0
2.02 Message Type and Content
Did the messages the operator delivered specifica lly include prov isions to educate th e public,
emergency officials, local public officials, and excavators on the:
Use of a one-call notification system prior to excavation and other damage preventi on acti vities;
Possible hazards associated with unintended releases fro m a gas, hazard ous liquid, or carbon
dioxide pipeline fac ility;
Physica l indications of a possible release;
Steps to be taken fo r pub Iic safety in the event of a gas, hazardous liq uid, or carbon dioxide
pipeli ne release; and
Procedures to report suc h an event (to the operator)?
(Reference: 192.616 (d); (f); 195.440 (d), (f))
Verify all required information was delivered to each of the primary stakeholder audiences.
Verify the phone number listed on message content is functional and clearly identifies the
operator to the caller.
[8]
[8]
[8]
[8]
Affected public
Emergency officials
Public officials
Excavators
[g) S -
Satisfactory (explain)*
D N/C - Not Checked (explain)*
Comments:
Page 6 of the plan includes the message type and
content
2.03 Messages on Pipeline Facility Locations

Did the operator develop and deliver messages to advise affected muni cipalities, school di stricts,
busi nesses, and res idents of pipeline faci lity location?
(Reference: 192.616 (e), (f); 195.440 (e), (f))
Verify that the operator developed and delivered messages advising municipalities, school
districts, businesses, residents of pipeline facility locations.
[g) S- Satisfactory (explain)*
Comments:
[ JU- Unsatisfactory (expl~in)*
D N/A- Not Applicable .(explain)*

2.04 Baseline Message Delivery Frequency

Did the operator' s delivery for materials and messages meet or exceed the baseline frequencies
specified in API RP 1162, Table 2-1 through Table 2.3? If not, d id the operator prov ide justificati on
in its program or procedural manual?
(Reference: 192.616 (c); 195.440 (c))
Identify message delivery (using the operator' s last five years of records) for the following
stakeholder audiences:
PHMSA Form-21 (192.61 6, 195.440) Public Awareness Program Effectiveness Inspection, July 21 , 2011 Rev 0.
- 7-
1:2] Affected public

1:2] Emergency officials
1:2] Public officials
1:2] Excavators
1:8] S- Satisfactory (explain)*
.D U- Unsatisfactory (explain)*
Comments:
Page 6 of the plan shows that the plan meets the
baseline frequencies specified in the API RP 1162.
ON/A- Not Applicable (explain)*
lJ
N/C- Not Checked (explain)*

2.05 Considerations for Supplemental Program Enhancements

Did the operator consider, along all of its pipeline systems, relevant factors to determine the need for
supplemental program enhancements as described in API RP 1 162 for each stakeholder audience?
(Reference: 192.616 (c); 195.440 (c); API RP 1162 Section 6.2)
Determine if the operator has considered and/or included other relevant factors for supplemental
enhancements.
0
0
Affected public
Emergency officials
Public officials
Excavators
D S- Satisfactory (explain)*
~ U- Unsatisfactory (explain)*
Comments:
The plan does not contain supplemental program
enhancements
[ ] N/A- Not Applicable (explain)*

2. 06 Maintaining Liaison with Emergency Response Officials

Did the operator establish and maintain liaison with appropriate fire, police, and other public officials
to: learn the responsibility and resources of each government organization that may respond, acquaint
the officials with the operator' s ability in responding to a pipeline emergency, identify the types of
pipeline emergencies ofwhich the operator notifies the officials, and plan how the operator and other
officials can engage in mutual assistance to minimize hazards to life or property?
Examine the documentation to determine how the operator maintains a relationship with
appropriate emergency officials.
Verify the operator has made its emergency response plan available, as appropriate and
necessary, to emergency response officials.
Identify the operator's expectations for emergency responders and identify whether the
expectations are the same for all locations or does it vary depending on locations.
Identify how the operator determined the affected emergency response organizations have
adequate and proper resources to respond.
Identify how the operator ensures that information was communicated to emergency responders
that did not attend training/information sessions by the operator.
-8-
Comments:
3. Program Evaluation & Continuous Improvement (Annual Audits)

3.01 Measuring Program Implementation
Has the operator performed an audi t or review of its program implementati on annua lly si nce it was
developed? If not, did the operator prov ide justificat ion in its program or procedural manua l?
(Reference: 192.616 (c), (i); 195.440 (c), (i); API RP 1162 Section 8.3)
Verify the operator performed an annual audit or review of the PAP for each implementation
year.
Comments:
3. 02 Acceptable Methods for Program Implementation Audits

Did the operator use one or more of the three acceptab le methods (i.e., intema l assessment, 3rd-party
contractor review, or regu latory inspections) to complete the annua l audit or review of its program
imp lementati on? If not, did th e operator provide valid justificati on fo r not using one of these
methods?
(Reference: 192.616 (c); 195.440 (c), API RP 1162 Section 8.3)
Determine how the operator conducts annual audits/reviews of its PAP.
C8J S -
Satisfactory (explain)*
_[
Comments:
Internal-assessment
] N/A- Not Applicable (explain)*

3.03 Program Changes and Improvements

Did the operator make changes to im prove the program and/or the implementation process based on
the results and fi ndi ngs of the annual audit? If not, did the operator prov ide justifi cation in its
program or procedu ra l manual?
Determine if the operator assessed the results of its annual PAP audit/review then developed and
implemented changes in its program, as a result.
If not, determine if the operator docum ented the results of its assessment and provided
justification as to why no changes were needed.
PHMSA Fonn-21 ( 192.61 6, 195 .440) Publi c Awareness Program Effectiveness Inspection, July 21 , 2011 Rev 0.
- 9-
Comments:
[ ] N/C- Not Checked (explain)*
4. Program Evaluation & Continuous Improvement (Effectiveness)

4. OJ Evaluating Program Effectiveness
Did the operator perform an effectiveness evaluation of its program (or no more than 4 years
following the effective date of program implementation) to assess its program effectiveness in all
areas along all systems covered by its program? If not, did the operator provide justification in its
program or procedural manual?
Verify the operator conducted an effectiveness evaluation of its program (or no more than 4 years
following the effective date of program implementation).
Document when the effectiveness evaluation was completed.
Determine what method was used to perform the effectiveness evaluation (in-house, by 3rd party
contractor, participation in and use the results of an industry group or trade association).
Identify how the operator determined the sample sizes for audiences in performing its
effectiveness evaluation.
Comments:
The last effectiveness evaluation was conducted
Nov. 27-28, 2012.
]N/C- Not Checked (explain)*

4.02 Measure Program Outreach

In evaluating effectiveness, did the operator track actual program outreach for each stakeholder
audience within all areas along all assets and systems covered by its program? If not, did the operator
provide justification in its program or procedural manual?
(Reference: 192.616 (c); 195.440 (c); API RP 1162 Section 8.4.1)
Examine the process the operator used to track the number of individuals or entities reached
within each intended stakeholder audience group.
Determine the outreach method the operator used to perform the effectiveness evaluation (e.g.,
questionnaires, telephone surveys, etc).
Determine how the operator determined the statistical sample size and margin-of-error for each of
the four intended stakeholder audiences.
~ Affected public
[gl Emergency officials

~ Public officials
~ Excavators
- 10-
Comments:
A statistical valid sample of customers plus an equal
number of non-customers was used.
N/A- Not Applicable (explain)*

4.03 Measure Percentage Stakeholders Reached

Did the operator determine the percentage of the individual or entities actually reached within the
target audience within all areas along all systems covered by its program? If not, did the operator
provide justification in its program or procedural manual?
(Reference: 192.616) (c); 195.440 (c); API RP 1162 Section 8.4.1)
Document how the operator determined the statistical sample size and margin-of-error for each of
the four intended stakeholder audiences.
Document how the operator estimated the percentage of individuals or entities actually reached
within each intended stakeholder audience group.
IZJ Affected public

IZJ Emergency officials
IZJ Public officials
IZJ Excavators
Comments:
4.04 Measure Understandability of Message Content

In evaluating effectiveness, did the operator assess the percentage of the intended stakeholder
audiences that understood and retained the key information in the messages received, within all areas
along all assets and systems covered by its program? If not, did the operator provide justification in
its program or procedural manual?
Examine the operator's evaluation results and data to assess the percentage of the intended
stakeholder audience that understood and retained the key information in each PAP message.
Verify the operator assessed the percentage of the intended stakeholder audience that (1)
understood and (2) retained the key information in each PAP message.
Determine if the operator pre-tests materials.
[8:1
[8:1
[8:1
[8:1
Affected public
Emergency officials
Public officials
Excavators
-11-
Comments:
l JU- Unsatisfactory (explain)*

4.05 Measure Desired Stakeholder Behavior

In evaluating its public awareness program effectiveness, did the operator attempt to determine
whether appropriate preventive behaviors ha ve been understood and are taking place when needed,
and whether appropriate response and mitigati ve behaviors would occur and/or have occurred? If not,
did the operator provide justification in its program or procedural manual?
Examine the operator's evaluation results and data to determine ifthe stakeholders have
demonstrated the intended learned behaviors.
Verify the operator determined whether appropriate prevention behaviors have been understood
by the stakeholder audiences and if those behaviors are taking place or will take place when
needed.
!ZI Affected public

IZI Emergency officials
!ZI Public officials
IZI Excavators
Comments:
4.06 Measure Bottom-Line Results

ln evaluating its public awareness program effectiveness, did the operator attempt to measure bottomline results of its program by tracking third-party incidents and consequences including: (I) near
misses, (2) excavation damages resultin g in pipeline failures, (3) excavation damages that do not
result in pipeline failures? Did the operator consider other bottom-line measures, such as the affected
public's perception of the safety of the operator's pipelines? If not, did the operator provide
justification in its program or procedural manual?
Examine the operator's process for measuring bottom-line results of its program.
Verify the operator measured bottom-line results by tracking third-party incidents and
consequences.
Determine if the operator considered and attempted to measure other bottom-line measures, such
as the affected public's perception ofthe safety ofthe operator's pipelines. If not, determine if
the operator has provided justification in its program or procedural manual for not doing so.
PHMSA Form-21 (192.616, 195.440) Public Awareness Program Effectiveness Inspection, July 21 ,2011 Rev 0.
-12-
Comments:
4.07 Program Changes

Did the operator identify and document needed changes and/or modifications to its public awareness
program(s) based on the results and findings of its program effectiveness evaluation? If not, did the
operator provide justification in its program or procedural manual?
(Reference: 192.616 (c); 195.440 (c); API RP 1162 Section 2.7 Step 12 and 8.5)
Examine the operator's program effectiveness evaluation findings.
Identify if the operator has a plan or procedure that outlines what changes were made.
Verify the operator identified and/or implemented improvements based on assessments and
findings.
Comments:
* Required field
5. Inspection Summary & Findings

5.01 Summary
Effectiveness evaluation using APGA GOAL Survey will be conducted in October 2016.
5. 02 Findings
-13-
Public
Awareness
PlanEffectivenss
Evaluation
:.
G. U E S T
E"
CRIATifl "'ARfNIIS FOI tUII(Itlli$ SOLUTIONS
December 5, 2012
Chuck Good
Pensacola Energy
1625 Atwood Dr
Pensacola, FL 32514
Dear Chuck,
Enclosed please find the data resulting from your APGA GOAL survey that
was conducted November 27-28, 2012. If you have any questions regarding this
data please do not hesitate to contact me. You have chosen the Minimum level of
participation. This means that we will conduct another survey in four years. We
have called a statistically valid sample of your customers plus an equal number
of non-customers. You will receive notification from us in October, 2016 when
we are ready to implement the next phase of the survey. Thank you for working
with Quest Fore and the APGA.
Sincerely,
Chris Gleditsch
cc: APGA
Enclosures
2100 Whanon Street, Suite SOO

Pittsbur&h, PA 15203
412.381.6670
FAX: 412.381.6680
Pittsburah
Chicaf10
Washintton, O.C.
questfore.com
tlfiJ American Public
Y'
G. U
Gas Association
CfiATIV HRTHfiiS FOit ~UAUTINr; SOlUTIONS
SAFETY AWARENESS STUDY REPORT- 2012

Safety Sponsor:
Pensacola Energy
Conducted:
November 27-28, 2012
I. 15,232 homes were called for this survey.

2. 811 live respondents completed the entire su rvey. This is 5.32% of all
households and 17.37% of all live respondents.
3. 62 respondents ( 1.33% of all respondents) chose to take the survey in
Spanish.
English Speaking Respondents:

1. 66.00% of all respondents have natural gas service at their home.
2. 65.41% of all respondents' gas company's name is Pensacola Energy.
3. 39.94% of all respondents have heard or received information on natural
gas safety from Pensacola Energy in the past 12-months.
4. 49.68% of all respondents have received written natural gas safety
information with a gas bill in the past 12-months.
5. 30.86% of all respondents have heard natural gas safety information on
television or radio.
6. 24.38% of all respondents have read about natural gas safety information
in local newspapers .
7. 79.43% of all respondents think they would recognize a natural gas leak
by being able to smell it.
8. 71.22% of all respondents think they would recognize a natural gas leak
by the hissing sound.
9. 0.99% of all respondents would light a match if they smelled gas inside
their house.
IO. 87.38% of all respondents have heard that they or an excavator company
should call a central number prior to digging, to avoid accidentally hitting
a natural gas pipeline.
I I. 95.35% of all respondents would call 911 from outside or from a
neighbor's house if they smelled gas inside their house.
12. 73.83% of all respondents have the number to call Pensacola Energy if
there was an incident or if they needed more information.
13. 46.06% of all respondents would like to hear the number to call Pensacola
Energy if there was an incident or if they needed more information.
PHMSA Form 24- Gas Distribution System DIMP Implementation Inspection, July 7, 2014, Rev 0
Distribution Integrity Management Program

Implementation Inspection Form
This inspection form is for the evaluation of an operator's implementation of its gas distribution integrity
management program (DIMP) through a review of its records and actions performed on pipeline
facilities . This inspection form is applicable to operators, other than Master Meter and Small LPG
operators, that have developed and implemented a DIMP under 192.1005. The form asks inspectors to
review records and perform field observations regarding the implementation of the DIMP required
elements. Following a review of the operator's DIMP plan, inspectors will observe actions taken by the
operator to ensure that procedures have been followed. There are instances when actions by an
operator could be deemed satisfactory by an inspector for an implementation question while still not
meeting the procedural requirements in the DIMP plan resulting in an unsatisfactory rating for a
corresponding procedural question .
Questions with code references beside them are enforceable . "S/Y" stands for "satisfactory" or "yes";
" U/N" stands for "unsatisfactory" or "no"; "N/A" stands for "not applicable"; and "N/C" stands for "not
checked". If an item is marked U/N, N/A, or N/C, an explanation must be included in the comments
section . Due to the unique characteristics of some operator' s system, there are instances where an
operator is not required to perform an action, and some of the questions requesting a review of
documents may not apply and would be rated as "N/ A" (rather than rating "U/N"). For instance, in
Question #8, if the operator has NOT acquired any new information relevant to threat identification,
rate as "N/A".
Correspondingly, if the operator had acquired new information that needed to be
included in the threat identification and had not, then the rating would be "U/N".
This inspection form includes two types of activities- records review and field observation activities:
The Records Review questions are to be performed on records used by an operator for
implementing its DIMP plan . Not all parts of this form may be applicable to a specific Records
Review Inspection, and only those applicable portions of this form need to be completed.
The Field Observation questions are to be used on field activities being performed by an
operator in support of its DIMP plan . Field Observation inspection activities may also include
review of data, environmental conditions, and assumptions being used by an operator in
support of its DIMP plan . Not all parts of this form may be applicable to a specific Field
Observation Inspection, and only those applicable portions of this form need to be completed .
A review of applicable Operations and Ma intenance (O&M) and DIMP processes and procedures
applicable to the field activity being inspected should be considered by the inspector to ensure the
operator is implementing its O&M Manuals and DIMP in a consistent manner.
PHMSA Form 24 (192 .1005-192.1011) Gas Distribution System DIMP Implementation Inspection, July 7, 2014, Rev 0
Page 1
Operator Contact and System Information
Operator Information:
Name of Operator (legal entity):
PHMSA Operator ID:
4475
I Olnvestor Owned
~I Municipal 0Private 0LPG

Oother (Identify- e.g., cooperative)
State(s) included in this inspection
Florida
Type of Operator:
Headquarters Address:
1625 Atwood Drive, Pensacola, FL 32514
Company Contact:
Darryl Singleton
Phone Number:
850-473-6940
Email:
dsingleton@cityofpensacola.com
Date(s) of Inspection
7/3/15-7/14/15
Date of this Report
7/19/15
Date of Current DIMP Plan/Revision
6/30/15
Persons Interviewed:
Persons Interviewed
Phone
{list primary contact first)

Bonnie Hoffman
Title
Email
Number
Regulatory and
850-474-
Compliance Manager
5309
State.'IRederaI R epresen tat"1ves:

Inspector Name and Agency
Phone Number
Email
850-413-7001
rsimpson@ psc.state.fl .us
Hassan Badran
813-637-8674
hbadran@ psc.state.fl.us
Farhan Alnajar
813-637-8662
fa Inajar@ psc.state.fl. us
Robert Simpson, Florida Public

Service Commission
System Description Narrative:
PHMSA Form 24 (192.1005-192.1011) Gas Distribution System DIMP Implementation Inspection, July 7, 2014, Rev 0
Page 2
Question
Number
Rule
192.1005
* -If not
satisfactory,
insert
appropriate
code
section(s}
Inspector Comments
1
Description
N/C
Is the operator collecting the missing or

incomplete system information and data
using the procedures prescribed in its DIMP
plan?
[8]
Has the operator incorporated into the DIMP

plan any new or missing information
identified or acquired during normal
operations, maintenance, and inspection
activities?
Revisions in rank identification
[8]
Has the operator captured required data on

any new pipeline installations? For pipe,
fittings, valves, EFVs, risers, regulators, shutoffs, etc., examples of data and records
required to be collected by operator since
August 2, 2011 include, but are not limited
to, the following :
Location
Material type and size
Wall thickness or SDR
Manufacturer
Lot or production number
[8]
Knowledge of the system

Is the operator collecting the missing or
incomplete system information and data
needed to fill knowledge gaps to assess
existing and potential threats?
Inspector Comments
.1007(a}(S}
5
N/A
[8]
Have all issues raised in previous DIMP

inspections been satisfactorily addressed?
Provide comments below.
.1007 (a}(3}
Inspector Comments
.1007 (a}(3}
4
U/N
Issues Identified in previous Integrity Management lnspection(s)
192.1007(a)
Inspector Comments
.1007 (a}(3}
3
S/V
Inspector Comments
PHMSA Form 24 (192 .1005-192.1011) Gas Distribution System DIMP Implementation Inspection, July 7, 2014, Rev 0
Page 3
Question
Number
Rule
.1007 (a)
Inspector Comments
7
.1007 (a)
Inspector Comments
.1007 (a)
8
S/Y
U/N
N/A
N/C
Are data collection forms used in

conjunction with the operator's DIMP plan
being fully and accurately completed?
Note: This question can be answered by
office review of records and/or comparison
of field conditions to information in the
reviewed records.
[g)
If new Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) input

is incorporated into the DIMP plan, do SMEs
have the necessary knowledge and/or
experience (skills sets) regarding the areas
of expertise for which the SME provided
knowledge or supplemental information for
input into the DIMP plan?
[g)
Do operator personnel in the field
[g)
Description
understand their responsibilities under

DIMP plan? (Below are possible questions
for field personnel)
Would you explain what DIMP

training you have received?
What instructions have you received
to address the discovery of pipe or
components not documented in the
company records?
What instructions have you received
if you find a possible issue? (ex:
corrosion, dented pipe, poor fusion
joints, missing coating, excavation
damage, mechanical fitting failures)
If you find situations where the
facilities examined (e.g., size of the
pipe, coating) are different than
records indicate, what
documentation do you prepare?
If you are repairing a leak and find
that a fitting was improperly
installed, what documentation do
you prepare?
Inspector Comments
PHMSA Form 24 (192 .1005-192.1011} Gas Distribution System DIMP Implementation Inspection, July 7, 2014, Rev 0
Page 4
Question
Number
Rule
Description
S/Y
U/N
..
. ..
:~ ~
i . 192.1007
l.:!~~2:~~fy Threats; Evaluate and Rank,Jti~~ .,, . . _
~,.-.._i;',
~;'::.-:~ 1'1;'t(b) and (cf~; l'"":::c,,.":"
' <r "'"'
':t'"7:cf-:>-:,;.<J7: -~:;~~'1:i~ l :::,'~c:"'''
'
.1007(b)
Inspector Comments
10
.1007 (b)
Inspector Comments
11
.1007 (b)
Inspector Comments
.1007 (c)
12
Has the operator acquired any new

information relevant to system knowledge
that may affect its threat identification?
Revision in threat identification
Have any changes occurred that require reevaluation of threats and risks?
Examples include, but are not limited to, the
following:
Acquisition of new systems
Completion of pipe replacement
program
New threats (e.g., first time natural
forces damage, etc.)
Increase in existing threats (e.g.,
washouts, land subsidence, etc.)
Increase in consequences (e .g.,
new wall-to-wall pavement, etc.)
Organization
changes (e .g.,
downsizing of staff, company

restructuring, etc.)
Applicable
code revisions
Other (describe below)
co
.ct.
._.,,.,,
N/C
i:;1}i~.
[2J
[2J
Changes related to inactive service lines and trenchless technology

Has the operator identified information or
data from external sources (e.g. trade
associations, operator's consultants,
government agencies, other operators,
manufacturers, etc.) that may require reevaluation of threats and risks?
[8J
Since the last DIMP plan review by the

regulatory agency, has the operator
[2J
updated its threat identification and risk
assessment based on newly acquired
information or data (see Questions 9, 10,
and 11) relevant to system knowledge?
Update in threat identification by including inactive service lines and trench less
technology
Inspector Comments
N/A
Page 5
Question
Number
Rule
13
Inspector Comments
14
.1007 (c)
Inspector Comments
15
.1007 (c)
Inspector Comments
.1007 (c)
16
Inspector Comments
17
.1007 (c)
Description
If the operator has modified its threat

identification and risk evaluation and
ranking, were the revisions made in
accordance with the procedure in the
operator's DIMP plan?
Does the operator's current subdivision

process (grouping of materials, geographic
areas, etc.) adequately meet the need to
prope rly evaluate and rank the existing and
potent ial threats to the integrity of its
system?
Has the operator added or modified system

subdivisions within its risk evaluation and
ranking since the last plan review by the
regulatory agency?
If the operator has added or modified

system subdivisions, was it done in
accordance with the procedures described
in the operator's DIMP plan?
If the operator has added or modified

system subdivisions, did the new system
subdivision result in modifications to the risk
evaluation and ranking?
S/V
U/N
N/A
N/C
[8]
[8]
[8]
[8]
[8]
Inspector Comments
PHMSA Form 24 {192.100S-192.1011) Gas Distribution System DIMP Implementation Inspection, July 7, 2014, Rev 0
Page 6
Question
Number
';/
Rule
,,..
I .~&~.l~n~,
. '.' . E:"A=__ I"
'[I:
... l ::~ddress risks
18
.1007 (d)
S/V
Description
l~entlfy and implement measures to ';\.:~.:

.... .
;,,>.;
.,,::
U/N
N/A
:'a.tf ' :~%\~

0
l.ii
0
y; ~~~~~~;:~:: ,'1r. .~.
Does the documentation reviewed
[8]
N/C
demonstrate the operator is implementing

the measures to reduce risks per the DIMP
plan?
19
.1007 (d)
Inspector Comments
20
.1007 (d)
Inspector Comments
21
.1007 (d)
Has the operator completed any measures

[8]
to reduce risks resulting in the
elimination/mitigation of the associated
identified threat? (e.g., pipe replacement
program completed, etc.)
Operator is in the process of pipe replacement for active corrosion/leak history
[8J
If answering "Satisfactory/Yes" to question
19, has the operator re-evaluated and
ranked its risks (1007(c)) because of the
elimination/mitigation of an identified
threat to ensure that risk reduction
measures in place are appropriate?
Performed re-evaluation of the plan since its first DIMP evaluation.
Does each implemented risk reduction
[8J
measure identified in the DIMP plan address

a specific risk?
Inspector Comments
22
.1007 (d)
The plan addresses inactive service lines and trench less technology.
Can the operator provide documentation to
demonstrate that an effective leak
[8]
management program is being

implemented? Important components in an
effective program include, but are not
limited to, the following: Locate the leaks in
the distribution system; Evaluate the actual
or potential hazards associated with these
leaks; Act appropriately to mitigate these
hazards; Keep records; and Self-assess to
determine if additional actions are
necessary to keep people and property safe.
Answer "N/A" if operator repairs all leaks
when found.
Inspector Comments
The operator is in the process of using electronic databases for leak management
PHMSA Form 24 (192.1005-192.1011} Gas Distribution System DIMP Implementation Inspection, July 7, 2014, Rev 0
Page 7
Question
Number
':: ' '-
23
Rule
Description
S/Y
U/N
/..
performance, monitor ~e~~~~ an~,~
,,.> 1-1~~~,~2~7(et:71 I:l}:oo-~-~ur.e
1,'!;'>7--i>
,
,~;.:~,:d
evaluate effectiveness
p,;.; :,,
.1007 (e)
Inspector Comments
25
.1007 (e)
Inspector Comments
26
.1007 (e)
N/C
I'''"'';'"''',,
:..
.-~""/::-:
i;~0
C8J
C8J
C8J
C8J
D
D
D
D
D
D
0
D
D
C8J
C8J
Based on field observations and/or record

reviews, is the operator accurately collecting
the data used to measure performance in
accordance with the procedures in its DIMP
plan?
[8J
Is the operator monitoring each

performance measure from an established
baseline?
Is each performance measure added since

the DIMP plan was last updated tied to a
specific risk reduction measure or group of
measures?
C8J
~:.;.':!.,i.'<i:
Is the operator collecting data for the

required performance measures in
192.1007(e)?
i) Number of hazardous leaks either
eliminated or repaired, categorized by
cause?
ii) Number of excavation damages?
iii) Number of excavation tickets?
iv) Total number of leaks either eliminated
or repaired, categorized by cause?
v) Number of hazardous leaks either
eliminated or repaired, categorized by
material? (Note: Not required in PHMSA
Distribution Annual Report Form 7100.1-1)
vi) Any additional measures the operator
determines are needed to evaluate the
effectiveness of the DIMP plan in controlling
each identified threat? (Note: Not required
in PHMSA Distribution Annual Report Form
7100.1-1)
Inspector Comments
24
.1007 (e)
N/A
Inspector Comments
PHMSA Form 24 (192.100S-192.1011) Gas Distribution System DIMP Implementation Inspection, July 7, 2014, Rev 0
Page 8
Question
Number
27
Rule
Description
192.1007(1)
Periodic Evaluation and Improvement

Has the operator performed a periodic
evaluation of its DIMP plan on the frequency
specified in the plan?
.1007 (f)
Inspector Comments
28
.1007 (f)
Inspector Comments
.1007 (f)
30
[2J
'
U/N
.
: ..
D
,.
N/A
.-..
- <.
N/C
,.,,;>;;-,,
If a periodic evaluation has not been

required since plan implementation or the
last inspection, mark questions 27-32 as
"N/A".
Operator has performed a periodic evaluation as noted in the plan.
Did the periodic evaluation include the
following :
Verification of general system
information (e.g., contact information;
form names; action schedules, etc.)?
New information acquired since the
previous evaluation?
Review of threats and risks?
Was the risk model re-run?
Review of performance measures?
Review of measures to reduce risks?
Evaluation of the effectiveness of
measures to reduce risks?
Modification of measures to reduce
risks, if necessary?
Inspector Comments
29
.1007 (e)
S/Y
[2J
[2J
[2J
[2J
[2J
[2J
D
D
D
l8J
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
l8J
If any established performance measures

indicated an increase in risk beyond an
acceptable level (as established in the DIMP
plan), did the operator implement new risk
reduction measures along with their
associated performance measures?
[2J
If the periodic evaluation indicates that
[2J
imglemented measures to reduce risks are

NOT effective, were risk reduction measures
modified, deleted or added?
Inspector Comments
Page 9
Question
Number
31
Rule
Description
S/Y
U/N
N/A
N/C
.1007 (f)
Did the periodic evaluation indicate that the
[8J
[8J
selected performance measures are

assessing the effectiveness of risk reduction
measures?
If not, were performance measures
modified, deleted or added? (describe in
Inspector comments)
Inspector Comments
32
.1007 (f)
Did the operator follow its procedures in

conducting periodic evaluation and program
improvement?
Inspector Comments
..
~;-;_
/
..
~.
33
I ~-~port results
... I ',;-~~~~,~~:,:::
(g)
.1007(g)
~;~,sj~}~~
':"i:cr:.J.',:
Did the operator complete Parts C and D of
~
D D D
the PHMSA Distribution Annual Report

(Form 7100.1-1) in its submission to PHMSA
and the state regulatory authority having
jurisdiction, if required, for each year since
the last inspection?
Inspector Comments
192.1009
34
.1009
What must an operator report when mechanical fittings fail?

Has the operator maintained accurate
~
records documenting mechanical fitting
u u
failures resulting in hazardous leaks?

Inspector Comments
Page 10
..
D
Question
Number
35
Rule
Description
S/V
U/N
N/A
N/C
.1009
Did the operator report all mechanical fitting
[8J
[8J
[8J
failures that resulted in a hazardous leak for

the previous calendar year to PHMSA and
State authorities, as appropriate, by March
15th of the next calendar year?
Did the reports contain the information
required by Department of Transportation
Form PHMSA F-7100.1-2?
Inspector Comments
36
.1009
Did the operator follow its procedure(s) for

collecting the appropriate information and
submitting PHMSA Form F-7100.1-2?
Methods to verify include, but are not
limited to, the following:
Field observation of the excavation of a
fa iled mechanical fitting
Examination of failed fittings or
photographs that have been retained by
the operator
Interview with field personnel
responsible for collecting information
Inspector Comments
PHMSA Form 24 (192.1005-192.1011} Gas Distribution System DIMP Implementation Inspection, July 7, 2014, Rev 0
Page 11
Question
Number
',
37
,.
Rule
192.1011
.1011
S/V
Description
I, What
records must an operator keep?
Is the operator retaining the records
,. ,':(.\;- :
[;8J
U/N
;,z~
N/A
N/C
.. :~:.:.;;..:;;:: .., ;~:!'';".
[;8J
[;8J
demonstrating compliance with Subpart P,

as specified in its DIMP plan, for 10 years (or
since 08/02/2011)?
Inspector Comments
38
.1011
Did the operator retain for 10 years (or since

08/02/2011) copies of superseded DIMP
plans?
Inspector Comments
39
.1011
Did the operator follow its DIMP procedures

applicable to records retention?
If answered "Unsatisfactory/No", then list
those procedures not followed below.
Inspector Comments
192.1013
40
.1013 (c)
When may an operator deviate from required periodic inspections under

;'
,.
this part?
[;8J
Has the operator received approval from
PHMSA or the appropriate State Regulatory
Authority for alternate (less strict than code)
[;8J
[8J
periodic inspection intervals?

(If no, mark questions 40-44 "N/A")
Inspector Comments
41
.1013 (c)
Has the operator conducted the periodic

inspections at the specified alternate
intervals?
Inspector Comments
42
.1013 (c)
Has the operator complied with all

conditions that were required as part of the
alternate inspection interval approval?
If answered "Unsatisfactory/No", then
provide comments below.
Inspector Comments
Page 12
Question
Number
43
Rule
Description
.1013 (c)
Do pe rformance measure records indicate

that an equal or greater overall level of
safety has been achieved since the alternate
inspection frequency was implemented?
Inspector Comments
44
.1013 (c)
S/Y
U/N
N/A
N/C
If that an equal or greater overall level of

safety has not been achieved, is the
opera t or taking corrective action?
Provide comments below regarding
corrective actions taken or lack thereof.
Inspector Comments
Additional Inspector Comments:

Conditions observed in the field can provide insights into the effectiveness of the operator's DIMP plan
implementation. Please comment on your general field observations.
Please comment on the operator's safety culture. Safety Culture is the collective set of attitudes, values,
norms and beliefs, which pipeline operator's employees share that demonstrate a commitment to
safety over competing goals and demands. A positive safety culture is essential to an organization's
safety performance regardless of its size or sophistication . Characteristics of a positive safety culture
include the following:
1.
2.
Embraces safety (personnel, public, and asset) as a core value,

Ensures everyone understands the organization's safety culture goals,
3.
Inspires, enables, and nurtures culture change when necessary,
4.
Allocates adequate resources to ensure individuals can successfully accomplish their safety
management system responsibilities,
5.
Encourages employee engagement and ownership,
6.
Fosters mutual trust at all levels, with open and honest communication,
7.
Promotes a questioning and learning environment,
8.
Reinforces positive behaviors and why they are important,
9.
Encourages non-punitive reporting and ensures timely response to reported issues.
Page 13
NOTICE: This report is requ ired by 49 CFR Part 191 . Failure to report can result in a civil penalty not to exceed 100,000
for each violation for each day that such violation persists except that the maximum civil penalty shall not exceed
$1 ,000,000 as provided in 49l,JSC 60122.
U.S Department of Transportation

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
OMB NO: 2137-0522

EXPIRATION DATE: 10/31/2016
Initial Date
Submitted:
03/02/2015
Form Type:
INITIAL
Date Submitted:
ANNUAL REPORT FOR

CALENDAR YEAR 2014
GAS DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
A federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to a penalty for failure to comply with a collection of
information subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of information displays a current valid OMB Control Number. The OMB Control
Number for this information collection is 2137-0522. Public reporting for this collection of information is estimated to be approximately 16 hours per response, including the
time for reviewing instructions, gathering the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. All responses to this collection of information are
mandatory. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden to: Information
Collection Clearance Officer, PHMSA, Office of Pioeline Safetv IPHP-30) 1200 New Jersev Avenue, SE , Washinaton , D.C. 20590.
20153554-23991
(DOT use only)
PART A OPERATOR INFORMATION
PENSACOLA, ENERGY SERVICES OF
1. Name of Operator
2. LOCATION OF OFFICE (WHERE ADDITIONAL
INFORMATION MAY BE OBTAINED)
2a. Street Address
1625 ATWOOD DRIVE
2b. City and County
PENSACOLA
2c. State
FL
2d . Zip Code
32514
3. OPERATOR'S 5 DIGIT IDENTIFICATION NUMBER
4475
4. HEADQUARTERS NAME & ADDRESS

4a . Street Address
1625 ATWOOD DR
4b. City and County
PENSACOLA
4c. State
FL
4d . Zip Code
32514
5. STATE IN WHICH SYSTEM OPERATES
FL
PART B SYSTEM DESCRIPTION

1.GENERAL
STEEL
UNPROTECTED
MILES OF
MAIN
NO. OF
SERVICES
PLASTIC
CATHODICALLY
PROTECTED
CAST/
WROUGHT
IRON
DUCTILE
IRON
COPPER
OTHER
SYSTEM
TOTAL
BARE
COATED
BARE
COATED
351 .06
87 .33
200.4
881 .98
84 .85
1605.62
16040
1197
40640
57877
2.MILES OF MAINS IN SYSTEM AT END OF YEAR

MATERIAL
UNKNOWN
2" OR LESS
OVER 2"
THRU 4"
OVER4"
THRU 8"
OVERS"
THRU 12"
OVER 12"
SYSTEM
TOTALS
STEEL
465
73 .1
73.56
17.63
9.5
638.79
DUCTILE IRON
0.00
COPPER
0.00
CAST/WROUGHT
IRON
.69
64 .55
19.15
.25
.21
84 .85
PLASTIC PVC
0.00
PLASTIC PE
714.17
94 .26
58.41
15.14
881 .98
PLASTIC ABS
0.00
PLASTIC OTHER
0.00
OTHER
0.00
TOTAL
0.00
1,179.86
231 .91
151 .12
33.02
9.71
1,605.62
OVER 2"
THRU 4"
OVER4"
THRU 8"
OVER 8"
SYSTEM
TOTALS
3.NUMBER OF SERVICES IN SYSTEM AT END OF YEAR
AVERAGE SERVICE LENGTH: 70
MATERIAL
UNKNOWN
1" OR LESS
OVER 1"
THRU 2"
STEEL
13841
3369
21
17237
DUCTILE IRON
COPPER
CAST/WROUGHT
IRON
PLASTIC PVC
PLASTIC PE
39258
1367
15
40640
PLASTIC ABS
PLASTIC OTHER
OTHER
TOTAL
53099
4736
36
57877
4.MILES OF MAIN AND NUMBER OF SERVICES BY DECADE OF INSTALLATION
UNKNOWN
PRE1940
1940-1949
1950-1959
1960-1969
1970-1979
1980-1989
1990-1999
2000-2009
2010-2019
TOTAL
MILES OF
MAIN
165.28
6.61
18.55
258.16
245.1
114.27
206.54
271 .35
286.36
33.4
1605.62
NUMBER
OF
SERVICES
44406
12319
1152
57877
PART C- TOTAL LEAKS AND HAZARDOUS LEAKS ELIMINATED/REPAIRED DURING THE YEAR
MAINS
SERVICES
CAUSE OF LEAK
TOTAL
HAZARDOUS
TOTAL
HAZARDOUS
CORROSION
82
23
141
132
NATURAL FORCES
14
13
EXCAVATION DAMAGE
31
30
90
87
OTHER OUTSIDE FORCE

DAMAGE
MATERIAL OR WELDS
EQUIPMENT
136
34
288
250
INCORRECT OPERATIONS
OTHER
NUMBER OF KNOWN SYSTEM LEAKS AT END OF YEAR SCHEDULED FOR REPAIR : 75
PART D- EXCAVATION DAMAGE
PARTE-EXCESS FLOW VALUE(EFV) DATA
NUMBER OF EXCAVATION DAMAGES:
115
NUMBER OF EXCAVATION TICKETS :
20157
NUMBER OF EFV'S INSTALLED THIS CALENDER YEAR ON SINGLE

FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SERVICES:
~1a
ESTIMATED NUMBER OF EFV'S IN
SYSTEM AT THE END OF YEAR:
17260
PART F- LEAKS ON FEDERAL LAND
PART G-PERCENT OF UNACCOUNTED FOR GAS
TOTAL NUMBER OF LEAKS ON FEDERAL LAND REPAIRED OR

SCHEDULED TO REPAIR: 0
UNACCOUUNTED FOR GAS AS A PERCENT OF TOTAL INPUT FOR

THE 12 MONTHS ENDING JUNE 30 OF THE REPORTING YEAR.
INPUT FOR YEAR ENDING 6/30:
4.5q
PART H- ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
PART I- PREPARER AND AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE

Dar!J:I Sin ~ leton,o ~erator
(Preparer's Name and Title)
Ill
l850l4 73-6940
(Area Code and Telephone Number)
dsin ~l eton ~ ci !l:of~ensacola . com
l850l4 74-5330
(Preparer's email address)
(Area Code and Facsimile Number)

2015 Pcola GS-1332

Încărcat de

Informații document

Titlu original

Drepturi de autor

Formate disponibile

Partajați acest document

Partajați sau inserați document

Opțiuni de partajare

Vi se pare util acest document?

Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

2015 Pcola GS-1332

Încărcat de

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

STATE OF FLORIDA

ART GRAHAM, CHAIRMAN

LISA POLAK EOGAR

Mr. Eric Olson, City Administrator

Mr. Eric Olson

August 19, 2015

cc: Tom Ballinger, Division Director

CAPITAL CIRCLE OFFICE CENTER 2540 SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD

Rick Moses, Chief of Safety, Bureau of Safety, Division of Engineering

Robert Simpson, Engineering Specialist III

Annual Pipeline Safety Evaluation: Pensacola Energy

FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

EVALUATION COMPLETED DATE: 8/14/2015

ADDRESS: 1625 Atwood Drive

EVALUATED BY: Robert Simpson, Hassan Badran, Farhan Alnajar

CITY: Pensacola, FL 32514

LIAISON CONTACTED: Don Suarez

Operations & Maintenance

Drug and Alcohol Program

Operator Qualifications Headquarters

Operator Qualifications Field

Distribution Integrity Management Plan

PHMSA Form 7100

#Inactive service lines overS ~ yrs.

#Inactive Service Lines

Emergency Equipment Up To Date

Emergency Plan Up To Date

Emergency Contacts Current

#Leaks without CP that have not had remedial corrosion control

#Leaks with CP that have not had remedial corrosion control

Operator Qualification Plan

Total of leaks on plastic pipeline from brittle-like

Operator Qualifi~ation Records

Miles bare steel pipe

Miles cast iron pipe

Miles plastic pipeline without means of location

Plastic Joiner Qualifications

Pressure Testing Of Facilities

Current annual PHMSA F 7100 reviewed for accuracy

Leak instrument surveys: business districts

Regulator Capacity Checked

Regulator Pressure Control

Survey areas reviewed and survey classifications updated

Standards, Rules, Regulations

Drug test# employees

Alcohol test# employees

Drug and alcohol testing labs on the DHHS approved list

PSC OS Il SUM MARY

CORROSION CONTROL SURVEY

Evelyn's Ln. & Cerny Rd. (TS 2)

Cerny Rd. & Muldoon Rd. (TS 4)

Laceida Dr. & Muldoon Rd. (TS 5)

Lenora St. & Donley St. (TS 26)

Hwy 29 Crossing Eastside at ventpipe

9908 Cove A venue

3763 Ashland Avenue

9919 Stirrup Drive

9832 Heather Drive

Navy Blvd. & Druid Drive

411 Creary Street

610 S. Navy Blvd.

3 700 Market Street

Market St. & Massachussetts Ave.