Sunteți pe pagina 1din 1

26722 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No.

88 / Monday, May 8, 2006 / Proposed Rules

manufacturer incentive payments and to August 13, 2004 (69 FR 50112) is Correction of Publication
clarify the proper treatment of such withdrawn. Accordingly, the publication of the
incentive payments under the Mark E. Matthews, notice of proposed rulemaking (REG–
intercompany transaction regulations. 146384–05), which was the subject of
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
On April 25, 2005, the IRS and Enforcement. FR Doc. 06–3321, is corrected as
Treasury Department published Rev. [FR Doc. E6–6888 Filed 5–5–06; 8:45 am] follows:
Rul. 2005–28 (2005–19 IRB 997), which BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
suspends, in part, Rev. Rul. 76–96 PART 1—INCOME TAXES
(1976–1 CB 23). Rev. Rul. 2005–28 Paragraph 1. The authority citation
states that the IRS will not apply, and DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY for part 1 continues to read, in part, as
taxpayers may not rely upon, the follows:
conclusion reached in Rev. Rul. 76–96 Internal Revenue Service
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
that certain rebates made by a
26 CFR Part 1 § 1.846–2 [Corrected]
manufacturer to retail customers are
ordinary and necessary business On page 18054, column 3, paragraph
[REG–146384–05]
expenses deductible under section 162, instruction Par. 5., the language ‘‘Par. 5.
pending the IRS’s reconsideration of the Section 1.846–2 as amended by adding
issue and publication of subsequent RIN 1545–BF02 new paragraph (d) to read is follows:’’
guidance. is corrected to read ‘‘Par. 5. Section
Application of Section 338 to
The example in paragraph (c) of the 1.846–2 is amended by adding new
Insurance Companies; Correction
paragraph (d) to read as follows:’’.
proposed regulations relies, in part,
upon the premise that the manufacturer AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Guy R. Traynor,
Treasury.
incentive payment is an ordinary and Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch,
necessary business expense deductible ACTION: Correction to notice of proposed Legal Processing Division, Associate Chief
under section 162. To the extent that rulemaking. Counsel, (Procedure and Administration).
this premise is correct, paragraph (d) of [FR Doc. E6–6894 Filed 5–5–06; 8:45 am]
SUMMARY: This document corrects a
the proposed regulations illustrates the notice of proposed rulemaking that was BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
proper application of the intercompany published in the Federal Register on
transaction regulations. However, Monday, April 10, 2006 (71 FR 18053).
because Rev. Rul. 2005–28 suspends The document contains temporary ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Rev. Rul. 76–96, in pertinent part, these regulations providing guidance under AGENCY
paragraphs of the proposed regulations section 197 that apply to the treatment
are withdrawn pending further guidance 40 CFR Part 52
of certain insurance contracts assumed
on the section 162 issue considered in in an assumption reinsurance [EPA–R03–OAR–2006–0314; FRL–8165–3]
Rev. Rul. 76–96. transaction and section 338 that apply
to a deemed sale or acquisition of an Approval and Promulgation of Air
The example in paragraph (e) of the Quality Implementation Plans;
proposed regulations illustrates the insurance company’s assets pursuant to
an election under section 338 of the Maryland; Amendments to Stage II
application of the original issue Vapor Recovery at Gasoline
Internal Revenue Code, to a sale or
discount rules to the facts described in Dispensing Facilities
acquisition of an insurance trade or
paragraph (e) and, based on these facts,
business subject to section 1060, and to AGENCY: Environmental Protection
concludes that the transaction is not an
the acquisition of insurance contracts Agency (EPA).
intercompany transaction. This through assumption reinsurance.
conclusion is not dependent upon the ACTION: Proposed rule.
DATES: This correction is effective April
issue being reconsidered in Rev. Rul.
10, 2006. SUMMARY: EPA proposes to approve the
76–96. Nevertheless, because the
example in paragraph (e), standing FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: State Implementation Plan (SIP)
Mark J. Weiss, (202) 622–7790 (not a revision submitted by the State of
alone, does not provide guidance with
toll-free number). Maryland for the purpose of amending
respect to the application of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: the regulations pertaining to Stage II
intercompany transaction regulations to Vapor Recovery at Gasoline Dispensing
an intercompany transaction, paragraph Background Facilities. In the Final Rules section of
(e) of the proposed regulations is also this Federal Register, EPA is approving
The notice of proposed rulemaking
withdrawn. the State’s SIP submittal as a direct final
(REG–146384–05), that is the subject of
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1 this correction, is under sections 197, rule without prior proposal because the
338, and 846 of the Internal Revenue Agency views this as a noncontroversial
Income taxes, Reporting and Code. submittal and anticipates no adverse
recordkeeping requirements. comments. A detailed rationale for the
Need for Correction approval is set forth in the direct final
Withdrawal of Notice of Proposed rule. If no adverse comments are
As published, the notice of proposed
Rulemaking received in response to this action, no
rulemaking (REG–146384–05) contains
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS

Accordingly, under the authority of errors that may prove to be misleading further activity is contemplated. If EPA
26 U.S.C. 7805, the notice of proposed and are in need of clarification. receives adverse comments, the direct
rulemaking (REG–131264–04) that was final rule will be withdrawn and all
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1 public comments received will be
published in the Federal Register on
Income taxes, Reporting and addressed in a subsequent final rule
recordkeeping requirements. based on this proposed rule. EPA will

VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:54 May 05, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\08MYP1.SGM 08MYP1

S-ar putea să vă placă și