Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
17 th September 2015
When Basit was finally taken to hospital, he was diagnosed with tubercular meningitis.
The illness caused him to lose all movement in his lower limbs, confining him to a
wheelchair. A Medical Board conducted an assessment in April 2012 and concluded that
he was suffering from paraplegia and long term complications of spinal atrophy. More
recently a new medical board was convened at the order of the Lahore High Court. In a
report dated 1st August 2015, the Board concluded that Basit was permanently
disabledHe is likely to remain bed-bound for the rest of his life.
Until recently, Abduls conditions of confinement were truly appalling. He was confined
to lying on the floor of his cell, reliant on Jail officers to assist him with even the most
basic personal hygiene. His lawyers have found that he is not regularly moved and as a
result has suffered from bedsores. He also suffers from fecal and urinary incontinence.
Despite the horrendous conditions which Abdul Basit endured on a daily basis, he
strived to maintain his humanity, occupying himself by practising calligraphy, copying
out verses from the Quran.
On 28th July 2015 the Lahore High Court accepted a writ petition challenging Basits
execution on the basis that it would constitute cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment,
contravening the Pakistan Prison Rules and violating Basits fundamental rights as
protected by the Constitution of Pakistan and international law.
The Pakistan Prison Rules 1978 govern the manner and procedure to be adopted at the
time of executing a condemned prisoner. Rule 356 (Regulation of drops) has been
specifically designed in order to avoid the possibility of a botched execution and
contains procedures which simply cannot be carried out in respect of a disabled
prisoner.
The Lahore High Court ordered the jail authorities to appear in court on 1 st September
and confirm the procedures by which they intended to execute Basit. The Jail was
unable to give exact details of the procedures they intended to use, instead suggesting
that there were a number of possibilities including hanging Basit from his wheelchair or
from a stool placed on the gallows, either of which could leave Basit open to a seriously
botched hanging.
Nonetheless, the Lahore High Court dismissed Basits petition, arguing that since the
hanging of a paralyzed prisoner was not expressly forbidden by the rules there was no
bar to the execution going ahead. More worrying still, the Court dismissed arguments
based on Pakistans international obligations under the International Covenant on Civil
and Political Rights and the UN Convention Against Torture, stating that international
laws should be set aside. A further warrant for Basits execution could now be issued at
any time.