Sunteți pe pagina 1din 2

Federal Register / Vol. 71, No.

48 / Monday, March 13, 2006 / Notices 12769

communities, government agencies, The South Jersey Transportation Issued in Garden City, New York, March 3,
airport users, and FAA personnel. Authority submitted its noise exposure 2006.
Each airport noise compatibility maps, descriptions, and other Otto N. Suriani,
program developed in accordance with documentation produced during the Acting Manager, New York Airports District
Federal aviation Regulations (FAR) part noise compatibility study in 2003 to the Offices.
150 is a local program, not a Federal FAA on December 31, 2004. The [FR Doc. 06–2350 Filed 3–10–06; 8:45 am]
program. The FAA does not substitute Atlantic City International Airport’s BILLING CODE 4910–13–M
its judgment for that of the airport noise exposure maps were determined
proprietor with respect to which
by FAA to be in compliance with
measures should be recommended for DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
applicable requirements on July 15,
action. The FAA’s approval or
disapproval of FAR part 150 program 2005. Notice of this determination was Federal Aviation Administration
recommendations is measured published in the Federal Register on
according to the standards expressed in July 27, 2005. Receipt of Noise Compatibility
part 150 and the Act and is limited to The Atlantic City International Program Modification and Request for
the following determinations: Airport study contains a proposed noise Review; Orlando Sanford International
1. The noise compatibility program compatibility program update Airport, Sanford, FL
was developed in accordance with the comprised of actions designed for AGENCY: Federal Aviation
provisions and procedures of FAR part phased implementation by airport Administration, DOT.
150; management and adjacent jurisdictions. ACTION: Notice.
2. Program measures are reasonably
It was requested that the FAA evaluate
consistent with achieving the goals of SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation
and approve this material as a noise
reducing existing non-compatible land Administration (FAA) announces that it
uses around the airport and preventing compatibility program as described in
section 104(b) of the Act. The FAA is reviewing a proposed noise
the introduction of additional non- compatibility program modification that
compatible land uses; began its review of the program on July
15, 2005 and was required by a was submitted for Orlando Sanford
3. Program measures would not create International Airport under the
an undue burden on interstate or foreign provision of the Act to approve or
provisions of 49 U.S.C. 47501 et seq.
commerce, unjustly discriminate against disapprove the program within 180 days
(the Aviation Safety and Noise
types or classes of aeronautical uses, (other than the use of new or modified
Abatement Act hereinafter referred to as
violate the terms of airport grant flight procedures for noise control). ‘‘the Act’’) and 14 CFR part 150 by the
agreements, or intrude into areas Failure to approve or disapprove such Sanford Airport Authority. This
preempted by the Federal government; program within the 180-day period shall program modification proposes to revise
and be deemed to be an approval of such Land Use Element H of the Noise
4. Program measures relating to the program. Compatibility Program (NCP) for SFB
uses of flight procedures can be
The submitted noise compatibility approved on November 6, 2002, to
implemented within the period covered
program contained three proposed reflect the incompatible land uses
by the program without derogating
actions for noise mitigation. The FAA located within the 65 DNL noise
safety, adversely affecting the efficient
completed its review and determined contour of the 2004 Noise Exposure
use and management of the navigable
that the procedural and substantive Map. This program modification was
airspace and air traffic control systems,
requirements of the Act and FAR part submitted subsequent to a
or adversely affecting other powers and
150 have been satisfied. The Acting determination by FAA that the
responsibilities of the Administrator
Associate Administrator for Airports associated noise exposure maps
prescribed by law.
Specific limitations with respect to approved the overall program effective submitted under 14 CFR part 150 for
FAA’s approval of an airport noise January 11, 2006. Orlando Sanford International Airport
compatibility program are delineated in were in compliance with applicable
All three program measures have been requirements effective June 22, 2005.
FAR part 150, section 150.5. Approval approved in whole or in part. Measure
is not a determination concerning the The proposed noise compatibility
3 (use of Runway 13–31 as the program modification will be approved
acceptability of land uses under Federal,
preferential runway for night or disapproved on or before August 30
state, or local law. Approval does not by
departures) was disapproved in part due 2006.
itself constitute an FAA implementing
action. A request for Federal action or to ATCT concerns. DATES: The effective date of the start of
approval to implement specific noise These determination are set forth in FAA’s review of the proposed noise
compatibility measures may be detail in a Record of Approval signed by compatibility program modification is
required, and an FAA decision on the the Acting Associate Administrator for March 3, 2006. The public comment
request may require an environmental Airports on January 11, 2006. The period ends May 2, 2006.
assessment of the proposed action. Record of Approval, as well as other FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Approval does not constitute a evaluation materials and the documents Lindy McDowell, Federal Aviation
commitment by the FAA to financially comprising the submittal, are available Administration, Orlando Airports
assist in the implementation of the for review at the FAA office listed above District Office, 5950 Hazeltine National
program nor a determination that all and at the administration offices of the Dr., Suite 400, Orlando, Florida 32822,
measures covered by the program are South Jersey Transportation Authority. (407) 812–6331, Extension 130.
eligible for grant-in-aid funding from the The Record of Approval also will be Comments on the proposed noise
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES

FAA. Where Federal funding is sought, compatibility program should also be


available on-line at
requests for project grants must be submitted to the above office.
http://www.faa.gov/arp/environmental/
submitted to the FAA New York 14cfr150/index14.cfm. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
Airports District Office in Garden City, notice announces that the FAA is
New York. reviewing a proposed noise

VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:58 Mar 10, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00099 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\13MRN1.SGM 13MRN1
12770 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 48 / Monday, March 13, 2006 / Notices

compatibility program modification for Questions may be directed to the • WG–1, PED Characterization,
Orlando Sanford International Airport individual named above under the Garmin Room
which will be approved or disapproved heading FOR FURTHER INFORMATION • WG–2, Aircraft Path Loss and Test,
on or before August 30, 2006. This CONTACT. with WG–3, Aircraft Susceptibility,
notice also announces the availability of Issued in Orlando, Florida, March 3, 2006. MacIntosh-NBAA-Hilton/ATA Room
this program modification for public • WG–4, Risk Assessment, Mitigation,
Matthew J. Thys,
review and comment. and process, Colson Board Room
Assistant Manager, Orlando Airports District
An airport operator who has • WG–5, airplane Design and
Office.
submitted noise exposure maps that are Certification Guidance, ARINC
found by FAA to be in compliance with [FR Doc. 06–2353 Filed 3–10–06; 8:45 am]
Conference Room
the requirements of Federal Aviation BILLING CODE 4910–13–P • Chairmen’s Strategy session with
Regulations (FAR) part 150, Working Group Leaders
promulgated pursuant to the Act, may • Coordinate Recommendations to
submit a noise compatibility program DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Plenary: Phase 2 work plan, TOR
for FAA approval which sets forth the Federal Aviation Administration compliance verification, and schedule
measures the operator has taken or • April 4:
proposes to reduce existing non- RTCA Special Committee 202: Portable • Opening Plenary Session (Welcome
compatible uses and prevent the Electronic Devices and Introductory Remarks, Review
introduction of additional non- Agenda, Review/Approve previous
compatible uses. AGENCY: Federal Aviation Common Plenary Summary, Review
The FAA has formally received the Administration (FAA), DOT. Open Action Items)
noise compatibility program for Orlando ACTION: Notice of RTCA Special • Results of RTCA PMC meeting on
Sanford International Airport, effective Committee 202 Meeting: Portable publication of interim update DO–294A
on March 3, 2006. The airport operator Electronic Devices. • Update from Regulatory Agencies
has requested that the FAA review this (FAA, UK–CAA, Canadian TSB, FCC, or
material and that the modified noise SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice other)
mitigation measures, to be implemented to advise the public of a meeting of • Update on Work of EUROCAE
jointly by the airport and surrounding RTCA Special Committee 202: Portable Working Group WG58 by Michael
communities, be approved as a noise Electronic Devices. Crokaert of Airbus, WG58 Chairman
compatibility program under section DATES: The meeting will be held on • CEA PEDs Working Group Report
47504 of the Act. Preliminary review of April 3–7, 2006, from 9 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. and plans for ANSI accredited standard
the submitted material indicates that it ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at by Doug Johnson of CEA
conforms to the requirements for the Conference Rooms, 1828 L Street, NW., • Update on CTIA Task Force on cell
submittal of noise compatibility Suite 805, Washington, DC. phones on airborne aircraft by Paul
programs, but that further review will be Guckian of QUALCOMM
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
necessary prior to approval or • ‘‘Active RFID Transponders’ RF
disapproval of the program RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, NW.,
Emission and Cargo Bay Interference
modification. The formal review period, Suite 805, Washington, DC 20036–5133;
Path Loss Measurements for Aircraft
limited by law to a maximum of 180 telephone (202) 833–9339; fax (202)
Com/Nave Bands’’ by Truong Nguyen of
days, will be completed on or before 833–9434; Web site http://www.rtca.org.
NASA Langley Research Center
August 30, 2006. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant • ‘‘RF Propagation Flight Testing’’
The FAA’s detailed evaluation will be to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal (report on results from test) by Frank
conducted under the provisions of 14 Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92– Whetten of Boeing
CFR part 150, § 150.33. The primary 463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is • Break-out sessions for Working
considerations in the evaluation process hereby given for a Special Committee Groups:
are whether the proposed measures may 202 Portable Electronic Devices • Working Groups (WG) 1 through 5
reduce the level of aviation safety or meeting. The agenda will include: meet.
create an undue burden on interstate or • April 3: • WG–1, PED Characterization
foreign commerce, and whether they are • Co-chairs’ Strategy Sessions with • WG–2, Aircraft Path Loss and Test,
reasonably consistent with obtaining the Working Group Leaders with WG–3, Aircraft Susceptibility
goal of reducing existing non- • Working Group Progress and Status • WG–4, Risk Assessment, Mitigation,
compatible land uses and preventing the Update/Plan for Terms of Reference and process
introduction of additional non- (TOR) Compliance Review • WG–5, Airplane Design and
compatible land uses. • Overall Review of Plan and Certification Guidance
Interested persons are invited to Schedule for Phase 2 • Committee Consensus on
comment on the proposed program with • Plan for Recommendation on Remaining Phase 2 Work Plan. TOR
specific reference to these factors. All Scoping of Picocell Assessment and Compliance Plan, and Schedule for
comments relating to these factors, other Guidelines Completion
than those properly addressed to local • WG1, WG2, and WG3 to develop • April 5:
land use authorities, will be considered recommendations to SC–202 plenary on • Co-chairs’ Strategy Session with
by the FAA to the extent practicable. Mask-Like Object, recommendations to Working Group Leaders
Copies of the noise exposure maps, the FCC on emissions, and susceptibility • WG Progress and Status Update/
FAA’s evaluation of the maps, and the limits required from the aircraft systems Plan for (TOR) Compliance Review
proposed noise compatibility program side • Overall Review of Plan and
wwhite on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES

are available for examination at the • Working Group Coordination Schedule for Phase 2
following locations: Federal Aviation • Time for all Working Groups to • Working Groups Coordination
Administration, Orlando Airports meet together if required • Time for all Working Groups to
District Office, 5950 Hazeltine National • Working Groups (WG) 1 through 5 meet, if required
Dr., Suite 400, Orlando, Florida 32822. meet. • Working Groups Meet if required

VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:58 Mar 10, 2006 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00100 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\13MRN1.SGM 13MRN1

S-ar putea să vă placă și