Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
2
3
Page 2 of 28
1
2
4WORLD
5The belief that the World is Eternal is held by Peripatetic Minded Philosophers.
6However they believed that the World with its Materials all are Possible Beings and
7Eternal Ad Aliis. That is they all are Eternal Effects. In General the disbelieved in Jazz
8La Yatazazza: [Indivisible Point Masses].
9A number of other Philosophers believed that the World is Eternal Per Se like Deity,
10but Deity is the Prime Mover. The Untouched Mover and Ultimate of Beings in
11Movements.It appears that Eternally the World was as rest yet Deity made the first
12Motion in the World , but a large number of Philosophers believe that The Deity is
13the Eternal Mover and the World is Perpetuum Mobile.The movement is Eternal and
14Perpetual.
15But when the Eternity of the World is once accepted portals to Atheism are opened
16once for All.
17Semitic Religions agree that Deity Not only Created the World but also the the
18Materials which constitute the World. There general view is not that Deity first
19Created the Materials required to Create the World and then Created the World, but
20that Deity Created the world With All Materials in the World. The technical term for
21this is AlJal Al Muraccab. The term for the Former is Al Jal Al Basi:t.
22Unfortunately Philosophers like Ibn Sina, Ibn Ar Rushd also advocated this view. It is
23very good to see that Saint Thomas refuted Ibn Ar Rushd in his Philosophical Views ,
24and took Refutation Of Ibn Ar Rushd as his Prime Task. Saint Thomas indirectly
25defended Judaism and Islam on the issues where Judaism , Christianity and Islam
26agree against Ibn Ar Rushd. His perscrutation must be held in great respect and
27regard. In Indian Philosophy there are different views and believes about the
28Genesis of the Cosmos.
29Simple Hymn Of Genesis in Vig Veda is interpreted differently by different Indian
30Religious System.
31Pandit Dianand Sarsuti was a founder of a new Hindu Sect , yet he chose that
32Interpretation which is based on the Eternity of at least six types of Eternal
33Beings.He believed that Deity Constituted the World from them. If any one of them
34did not Exist Eternally, Deity Would be Unable to Manufacture the World. Although
35the followers of Respected Dianand Sarsuti use the word CREATION but it is not
36used in the Semitic sense but in the sense of Manufacturing and Construction from
37given Materials. So they are believed to Pre-Exist the World. In is strange to see that
38even he has mentioned the temporality of the Materials which he generally
39expostulated to be Eternal.
3Page 2 of 28
4
5
6
Page 3 of 28
40He believed that only an illiterate person can believe that any thing Distinct from
41Deity is Non Eternal instead of a disputed claim among intellectual scholars. His
42rigid views were not liked even by Vedic Scholars of other Hindu sects.
43DISCUSSION
7Page 3 of 28
8
9
10
Page 4 of 28
67This does shew that Vedas simply treach and preach that Any thing which is Other Than God is
68created whether it be Spirits, Parmanus, Asat [Acash] or Sat [Paracti]. Pandit Dianand was
69compelled to write this truth.
70This means that initially he believed that Only God and His Omnipotence are Eternal but he latter
71either changed his views or due to some his own reason began to preach other wise but still in
72heart believed in it. That is the reason he wrote what contradicts Arya Samaj belief of six
73Eternals. His followers usually neglect this view and preach otherwise. This is a proof that simple
74Teachings of Vedas were distorted by means of Dianandi Philosophy. Vedas only and simply
75preach that God
76And His Attributes like Breathing[Spiration,spiratio,] or Vita and Omnipotence are Eternal.
77Even Will Of God is not Eternal.
78
79But the question is why they denied that God is A Creator, i.e One That Hath Power
80to make things out of nothingness.
81The answer is that he had very wrong interpretation of Vedas. Had he believed that
82Vedas believe that God Can Create things from nothingness ,he would have
83believed in it like some other Hindus.
84How ever according to his interpretation he thought that Vedas deny the Divine
85Attribute of reativity , he attempted to prove it on rational grounds.
86So our discussion is based on two things.
871]Vedic Proofs.
882]Rational Proofs.
89
90Vedic Proofs.
911] The Great God the King revealed all kinds of knowledge to the human soul His eternal
92subjects through the Veda. YAJUR
93VEDA, 50, 8.
94It may be pointed out that the Vedic Hymn Of Creation does prove that In the Beginning Ther
95Was Neither Non Existence [Asat] nor Existence [Sat].
11Page 4 of 28
12
13
14
Page 5 of 28
96This is a proof that Veda believes that Nothing Other Than Deity Existed In Eternity.
97This proves that the word Eternal in the Veda:50,8 means a Relative Eternity i.e Beginning .
98Beginning Is Not Eternity. The Veda 50,8 means in Context Of HYMN Stated Above :=
991] The Great God the King revealed all kinds of knowledge to the human soul His
100Beginning subjects through the Veda. YAJUR
101VEDA, 50, 8.
102
103
104Rational Proofs.
105The Rational Proofs given by them are as fallow.
1061]Analogical Proof:
107If some one want to make a pot he needs mud which is the material of the pot. It is
108unthinkable to make a pot with out mud. Similarly if some one want to make a chair
109he requires wood. A chair cannot be made with out its material, which is wood in
110this case.
111But if it is supposed that a person makes a pod of some metal.
112metal like Copper or Silver or even Gold instead of mud.
17
18
Page 6 of 28
126Some how ever have attempted to revert this Postulate into a theorem and have
127provided an attempted proof for it.
128The have argued as follow:=
129If God Created then there are Only Two Possible Options.
1301]This Act Of Creation Occured When This Act Of Creation Did Not Exist .
1312]The Act Of Creation Occured When This Act Of Creation Did Exist .
132The former is IMPOSSIBLE since It is the Union Of Creation and Not Creation.
133The Latter is IMPOSSIBLE since Is the the Achieving Of the Achieved. It is Achieving
134the Very Self Of An Act Which Has Been Already Achieved.
135As both of the Alternatives are Impossible , The Act Of Creation Was Impossible. If It
136Was Impossible It is Perpetually Impossible .
1373]Argument of Ownership and Lordship .
138God is the King of the universe. He is an Eternal Lord. If God is the Lord then there
139must be some thing of which God should be LORD Of. Other wise Deity Cease to be
140an Eternal Lord. In other words Deity is not a Lord in Eternity. God is the Owner of
141the Universe and the world is His Property [Property in the sense of Owned things ,
142not in the sense of Quality]. God Cannot be Owner in Eternity If he the Material ,
143Spirits etc do not exist in Eternity. Similarly God would be a King without Kingdom,
144an Emperor with out any Empire and with out any Empyreal Army.
1454]Argument Of Love.
146God Loves His Subjects. Quality Of Love is Eternal. If His Subjects are not Eternal
147then His Quality Of Love Ceases in Eternity. God Must Love some things Distinct
148from God. If God Loveth some one In God orGodhead or if God loveth His Godhead
149then it is not Love but a type of Self Centerness . So the Spirits , Matter etc are
150Eternally Loved by God.
1515]Argument Of Justice.
152God is Just. If God is Just then he must be doing Justice .If there is no Subjects which
153are Judged by God
154Then God is not Just in Eternity.
1556]Argument Of Worship
156God means an Object Of Worship or One Who is worshipped. If Spirits are not
157Eternal then there is no one to worship God In Eternity and God ceases to be Object
19Page 6 of 28
20
21
22
Page 7 of 28
158of worship. This means God ceases to be God. If God was not worshipped in Eternity
159Then God was not God in Eternity. This implies God Himself is not Eternal.
160
1617]Argument Of Objectivity.
162i]If God is Omnipotent then there must be some thing under the Divine Power in
163Eternity. Otherwise God is Powerless in Eternity.
164ii]Similarly if God is Omniscience then there must be some thing which is in his
165knowledge. If there is nothing in Divine Knowledge then Knowledge ceases.
166iii]If Willeth to make a thing from nothingness He must Will at some thing which
167Exists. Other wise if there is nothing can be willed.
1688] Argument of Nothing is some thing.
169It is rarely argued that If God Made the world from NOTHING, then Nothing is Some
170Thing from which God Made the World. If there is some thing from which God made
171the world then this contradicts the claim that God made the world with out any
172thing.
173Dianand believed that Deity is not even the cause of Spirits, Pramanu etc. He
174believed in total independence of them.
175These are Uncaused as the Deity is Uncaused.
176Now it may be seen that all these Eternal THINGS SHARE the following Attributes
177and Qualities.
1781] Each one of them is Necessary Being.
1792] Each of them is Self Existing.
1803] Each one of them is Uncaused and Independent.
1814] Each one of them is Eternal.
1825]Their respective numbers are fixed and they can neither be increased or
183decreased.
1846]Annihilation Of Each One Of Them Is Impossible.
185Respected Diyanand did not claimed for the Eternity of the World but for the
186Eternity of Constituents and Ingredients Of the world.
187A part from them Dianand believed in the Eternity of Divine Qualities,Doings,Words
188as well.But as Deity is Communicable with them they are out discussion.
23Page 7 of 28
24
25
26
Page 8 of 28
210TWO PERMANU CAN TOUCH OR CONTACT EACH OTHER IS TO OVER LAP EACH OTHER. BUT
211THIS ONLY MEANS THAT THEY OCCUPY ONE AND SAME SPACE, IBN THIS WAY IN INDEFINITE
212NUMBER OF PARMANU HOWSOEVER LARGE CAN OVERLAP EACH OTHER WITH OUT
213OCCUPYING ANY REGION OF SPACE EXCEPT A POINT SPACE. ]
214As the number of Spirits suggested by Respected Dianand is very small in compare
215to the generations of living beings on earth this means that transmigration is the
216only solution. But this also imply impossibility of life in other heavenly bodies i.e
217life in space. But the major objection is that Divine Power is very limited in world.
218God may be mighty then other beings yet not Almighty and Omnipotent. The only
219possible way left for Dianandi God is to break a thing into its Eternal Constituents
220and then to craft an other thing from it.
221This is another limitation of Dianandi God.
222Last but not the least God in this system has no power to perform Miracles.
223So this type of God is very weak.
224If spirits are eternal then there is no need of a God.It may be the case the case that
225Different Spirits have different Powers to make different parts of the world. The
27Page 8 of 28
28
29
30
Page 9 of 28
226collectively made the world. If so then there is no need of a Dianandi God.It may be
227suggested that some of the Eternal Spirits loves to Incarnate while some do
228not.Those who do not regulate and run the world.
229This system is Atheistic since the collection of Eternal brings is itself a world. So no
230need of a God to
231Expain the World.
232If it is supposed that Each Parmanu is a Rational Vital Being as rationality and vita
233as their eternal qualities then then it may be the case that bodies are made by
234parmanus themselves as a mutual
235Coordination. It cannot be proved that Parmanu are neither intelligent and nor
236rational things.
237An other objection is that if the materials required to fashion the world are Eternal
238and the world manufactured from them is not eternal then God was idle and inert in
239eternity as according to Dianandi system. An objection which he often made on
240others. If it is said that there is a world prior to every world thus a continuous series
241of distinct worlds constituted from same constituents , then as this series is claimed
242to be Eternal, there Must be an Eternal World in Eternity. This world would be
243unmade, unmanufactured and un fashioned . Then there is no need of a God .What
244is the need of a God,who only destroyed an Eternal World. But the important thing is
245that if there is an Eternal World then such a world cannot be destroyed by a
246Dianandi God. It must be noted that Dianandi God cannot perform Miracles because
247He cannot break the laws of nature, then it is primarily true that the Eternal world
248cannot be destroyed , since it is nothing but the destruction of Eternal Nature and
249Eternal Laws of Eternal Nature.Thus if there is an Eternal Series of worlds such that
250prior to each world there was an other world of the same materials, then at least
251there is one world in eternity , other wise the series cannot be eternal. If not eternal
252then it must have a beginning. But as an eternal world if it existed in eternity cannot
253be made it was unmade. The belief in an unmade world is nothing but Atheism. In
254this situation Dianandi God did nothing but some how destroyed an eternal world
255and from its eternal matter crafted an other world for nothing,Then began to repeat
256the process till now. But this does shew God even in Dianandi system was inert and
257idle. He began to be active when he destroyed the eternal world and replaced it by
258a temporal world. This implies that the first act of God was the was Destruction.
259It is impossible that eternal beauty can be replicated by temporal beauties. So is
260God had the power to destroy the eternal world then this was very unwise act to
261destroy the Eternal Beautiful world.
262An Eternal World is inextinguishable and its Perpetual Continuation is inevitable.
263ATTEMTED ARGUMENT AND SANSCRIT SCRIPTURES.
31Page 9 of 28
32
Page 10 of 28
33
34
264The Vedic proof for the infinite series is Given as follow:=
265 It is said in the Rigveda 8:8, 48. The great Creator, made the sun and the moon
266just as He had made them before!
267But it is a very wrong concept of Vedic Verse. This verse only suggests that there
268was a sun before this sun a moon before this moon. There are thousands of Stars in
269space each a Sun. Several Satellites revolving around planets , so there is no
270confusion in this verse.
271It may be argued that if Vedas are Eternal then the verse is true for each Sun and
272each Moon, at all times. But if Vedas are Eternal this verse implies Pre Eternity in
273this scheme of reasoning, which is impossible, so this scheme of reasoning of Vedas
274is incorrect and wrong and its wrongness is independent of the believes of Eternity
275or Temporality Of the Vedas.
276Replying Rational Arguments:
2771]Discussion
On Analogical Argument.
37
38
Page 11 of 28
Page 12 of 28
41
42
329Or a Man which do not require Oxygen.
33018]If God is Omnipotent then God must be able to Destroy His own Omipotence, A
331quality which can even destroy it self. Such a Quality is is a flaw and falliblty . But
332God is free from them. Similarly if God is Omnipotent then God Must Hve Power to
333Punish a Person with out any transgression or sin or crime what so ever.
334From this the attempt to conclude that as Deity is not Omnipotent ,There fore He
335cannot make any thing from Nothingness. [ It is often argued that Deity Has Power
336to Make things from Nothingness and Non Existence Since the Holy Deity is
337Omnipotent and Divine Power is Omnipotence and Absolute.]
338In their zeal to refute this argument the opt the only possible way to claim that
339Deity is Not Omnipotent and Divine Power is not Absolute. Since if Deity is
340Omnipotent then there can be no objection on Divine Power to Create thing from
341nothingness.
342Analysis Of This Response.
343This is a misconception . Divine Omnipotence or the Absolute Power is defined to be
344a Power On each and Every Possible Per Se. It by definition excludes Per Se Absurd.
345 Possibles.
346The Set B which includeth All the Impossibilities or Absudities.
347Divine Power Includeth each and every thing of Set A.
348An Absudity may be of following types:=
349 1]
3502]One
3513]One
3524]
3535]
3546]Contradiction
3557]
Of Possibility
Self Contrdiction.
3568]
Page 13 of 28
45
46
3589]
361 So the word Absurd or Impossible is used for these things in General. Creation is Not Indcluded in
362these things.
363So
369Deity
COUNTER ARGUMENT
372In
47Page 13 of 28
48
Page 14 of 28
49
50
3872,1)
[Impossibilities/Incontingencies]
3912,3)
Possibilities [ Contingencies]
3922,4)
3932,5)
398Cantors
414One
51Page 14 of 28
52
Page 15 of 28
53
54
415See:Why
416work.
417SOME
2] Postulatic Argument.
434
435The
55Page 15 of 28
56
Page 16 of 28
57
58
442Suppose
a person wrote.
469Suppose
argued as follow:
59Page 16 of 28
60
Page 17 of 28
61
62
472If
if some one claim that nothing can be cut since the act
489of cutting is Impossible and Absurd.
490Some
4911]
more examples .
63Page 17 of 28
64
Page 18 of 28
65
66
5001,1]
5081,3]
518Suppose
526Now
Page 19 of 28
69
70
529In
538At
539Suppose
546In
5474,2]
71Page 19 of 28
72
Page 20 of 28
73
74
555IT
563There
Page 21 of 28
77
78
584Each type of Divine Attributes have some subdivisions. Kingship ,Ownership etc.
585are Not Incommunicable Attributes of Deity. In Case Of Deity [Divine Case]
586Kingship, Ownership, Lordship, Mastership are Relative Attributes Of Deity.How
587ever they are still different from Human Attributes Of Kingship etc. in some regards. In
588Eternity Deity the Divine Attributes of Kingship, Ownership etc. Are Potential.
589But the Difference between the Divine Potentia Kingship etc. and Human Potential Kingship
590etc is as Follow:=
591If there is a Single Subject Of Kingship Existeth then It is Per Se Impossible and Per Se
592Absurd That Deity is Not the King Of It.
593Similarly the same is true for Divine Attributes Of Ownership,Mastership,Lordship etc,
594Although Kingdom , Lordship are not Incommunicable Attributes Of Deity , But The Type Of
595Attributes Of Kingship, Ownership etc. Which are Attributes Of Deity Are Incommunicable.
596The same is true for the Attribute Of Worshipness or Worshiphood.
597Deity is One Who Eternally Deserveth To Be Worshiped. But it is Not Necessary That Act Of
598Worhipping the Deity is Eternal.
599The same is some what true for Justice. How ever It is In Power Of Deity to Punish a Person
600with out any Sin or Transgression .But Deity never Exercise this Power. The same is true for
601speaking a False Sentence. They are Relatively Absurd.
602
ON ARGUMENT OF [GRAMMATICAL]
608OBJECTS OF ATTRIBUTES
609 DIANANDI SYSTEM AND THE INCONSISTENCY OF ETERNITY OF SPIRITS
610,PARACTI ETC.
611In Sathyarath Paracash Respected Dianand said that:=
612Qualities ,Activities and Effects Of Eternal are Eternal.
613[S. P ,Ch#7:81]
614This Claim Is divided into three Sub Claims:=
615ALL QUALITIES [ATTRIBUTES] OF AN ETERNAL ARE ETERNAL.---------- C-1
79Page 21 of 28
80
Page 22 of 28
81
82
624IF All Qualities [Attributes] Of An Eternal Are Eternal Then Each and Every Attribute
625of The Eternal Is Eternal.[ A SIMPLE TAUTOLOGY]
626If Each and Every Attribute of a Thing is Eternal, then It does not have any Not
627Eternal Attribute. [C-1]
628Since If It Has Any Non Eternal Attribute then Some Attribute Of the Eternal Are Non
629Eternal.
630If some Attrbute Of An Eternal are Not Eternal then then the following Claim is
631False:=
632All Attributes Of (an ) Eternal Are Eternal.
633But this Claim is true even according to Pandit Dianand Sarsuti.
634So If Some Attributes Of A Thing [ at least] are Non Eternal then the Thing is Non
635Eternal.
636
637Q.E.D
638SIMILARLY the following claims can be proved.
639One That have at least one Non Eternal Act [Doing] is Not Eternal. [Using C------2]
640One That have at least one Non Eternal Effect is Not Eternal. [Using C-----------3]
641According to this rule the Impossibility of Eternity Of Spirits, Paramanu, Paracti etc.
642is followed.
643Let it be discussed one by One:=
6441]Spirits:=
83Page 22 of 28
84
85
86
Page 23 of 28
6451,a] If Spirits are Eternal then they cannot be depended upon Deity, Since
646Independence is among the Eternal Qualities of Eternal Spirits. If they are
647independent then their independence is Perpetual and Eternal and cannot be
648ceased i.e Unceaseable. But they depend Upon Deity in many regards as admitted
649in the System. So this imply Spirits are not Eternal.
650The Act of transmigration is not Eternal and each Act is Temporal and this implies
651that Spirits are Not Eternal.
6521,b] If Eternal Spirits depend upon Deity in some regard , and in those regard then
653they are Eternally dependent. This means they are not Per Se Eternal but Eternal Ab
654Aliis in those regard as stated above.
655But if they are Eternally Dependent then they are Eternal Ad Aliis. But Dianandi
656system does not believe in Eternal Ad Aliis. So if Spirits are neither Per Se Eternal
657since Per Se Eternal cannot be dependent at all, nor Eternal Ad Aliis. Then they are
658Temporal. This proves inconsistency in the system.
6591,c] If all Qualities of an Eternal are Eternal then they are either Ignorant in Eternity
660or does have an Eternal Knowledge.
661If they are Ignorant in Eternity then it is impossible for any Spirit to know any thing
662since the Eternal Ignorance cannot be replaced by Non Eternal Knowledge.
663If they have Eternal Knowledge then it cannot be Annihilated or Destroyed. So the
664result is that every person must know this Eternal Knowledge. Since Knowledge of
665Spirits cannot be annihilated and every Human being must know this Eternal
666Knowledge. But this is not the case .The knowledge of human beings are not
667Eternal.
668Each human being must receive the Eternal Knowledge by means of a his/her
669Spirit,therefore it must be in mind and memory of every human being .But this is
670not the case. This does prove that Spirits are not Eternal.
671 1,d] If two things say and exists such that depends on in some regards [say
672in some Attributes\Qualities or Acts\Doings or both] and is independent of in all
673regards ( with out any Possible and Actual Exception) then if the Independent and
674Dependent connection between and is Supposed to be Ceased then this imply
675the Annihilation of in some regards. Since if a thing depends upon an other thing
676in some regard [say Attributes or Acts or both] and if the Independent Dependent
677Relation Ceases then these regards [Qualities or Acts or Both] are Annhilated, and
678ceased to exist Immidiately with out any actual or possible delay.But if the
679Annihilation of atleast One Attribute or Act is Possible the Attribute or the Act is
680Certainly Not Eternal. If some Acts or Qualities of a thing are not Eternal then this
681contradict the Axiom of Dianandi System Of Theology which is stated as follow:=
682All the Qualities and Doings Of An Eternal Are Eternal.
87Page 23 of 28
88
89
90
Page 24 of 28
683Spirits do depend on the Deity in some regards stated above and hence by
684the Axiom they cannot be Eternal , in the Dianandi system of theology.
685This proves that Spirits are not Eternal.
6862]Parmanu:=
687A Parmanu [Farmanu] is a tiny particle may be called Atom. But there are two
688concepts in Phlosophy
6891] They are tiny spheres with a radius r>0 [Democritus Particles]
6902] They are Point masses with radius r=0
691According to Dianandi system it appears the latter.
692In the latter case all the Parmanus in the world can over lap in the single point of
693space.
694They cannot constitute a Body.
695In the former case they are mentally divisible. Since if there radius r = , where >0
696yet very very small even then one can suppose a number /2 <.In this case they
697may be assumed as Spheres of very small radii. In this case the cannot be Eternal
698Since they can touch each other without overlapping. Suppose that two such
699Particles touched one an other. So act of touching one an other [mutual toching]
700Must be Eternal. Since Every Act Of An Eternal Is Eternal In Dianandi System. But we
701see that in the system God Changes their Combinations. So they cannot be Eternal
702otherwise It is even out of the Power Of Dianandi God to do so. [It shal be discussed
703latter].
704Pandit Dianand Sarsoti in either case did not explained the nature of conjunction of
705these particles. It is not informed how do they constitute a body.
706Any How there are several inconsistencies in regard to Parmanus:=
7072,a] If they are Eternally moving in Chaos ,t hen the Chaotic motion is there Eternal
708Property/Quality. It cannot be ceased . If Deity manufactured and fashioned bodies
709from them their Eternal Motion did cease. This imply that some Qualities and Acts/
710Doings Of Eternal are not Eternal.
711This contradicts the Axiom:=
712All the Qualities and Doings Of An Eternal Are Eternal.
713So if there was an Eternal Chaotic motion in Parmanus, it must have to
714continue for ever.
91Page 24 of 28
92
93
94
Page 25 of 28
97
98
Page 26 of 28
747If there are different types of thing existing [Other than Deity] in
748Eternity ,each with a pre existence, then their States Must be Eternal. If
749there states are Eternal then they cannot be changed, otherwise some
750states of Eternals are not Eternal. This contradicts Dianandi Axion stated
751above since each and every state is either an Act or an Attribute or an
752Effect. This implies that either all these Eternal things are in Eternal State
753since Eternity, with out any addition of non eternal state and without any
754substraction of any Eternal state.
755If not so then all these things stated above are NOT ETERNAL.
7563] PARACTI:757If Paracti is Eternal then either it is Sat [Existence] or Cause or Nature.
758If it is Eternal Nature then there can be no Non Eternal Thing in the
759Nature. Existence Of Non Eternal Things destroys the Eternal State Of
760Nature which is free from Not Eternals.
761If Paracti is Existence then it is not Eternal.
762If it is Eternal Cause then its Effect Must be Eternal other wise it ceases to
763be a Cause. This implies that the thing what so ever it was in Eternity was
764Neither A Cause Nor An Effect In Eternity, But some how this thing gained
765the Quality of Causality . Thus the Property/Quality Of Causality is Not
766Eternal. If Not Eternal then atleast One Of the Quality of Eternal is Not
767Eternal. If So then the Claim All Attributes Of An Eternal Are Etternal Is
768Contradicted.
769But this is true even in Diyanandi System.
770If this claim is true then any thing which has a Non Eternal Quality Of
771Causality is Not ETERNAL.
7724] Space [ Acash ,Asat]:=
773Either Space is Non Existence and Nothingness or It Is an Existing Thing.
774If it is nothing then the entire discussion ceases. If it is an Existent [ a
775being] then its states changes as a body changes its position in space.
776This proves that space is not eternal as well.
777WHAT IF SOME QUALITIES OF ETERNAL ARE NOT ETERNAL.
778If it is supposed that the claim :=
779SOME QUALITIES OF ETERNAL ARE NOT ETERNAL.
780Then it is implied that some Qualities of God are Not Eternal.
99Page 26 of 28
100
Page 27 of 28
101
102
781Since God is One Of the Eternals.
782If So then All the Dayanandi arguments in the Support of Eternity Of Four
783Vedas Fall down and become invalid.
784Since they are based on the Claim:=
785ALL THE QUALITIES / ATTRIBUTES OF AN ETERNAL ARE ETERNAL
786
CONUNDRUM
787 Dianand Sarsoti believed that The Materials and Constituents Of the World are but the
788World is not .He believed that Deity Makes the World from the Eternal Materials then
789Demolishes Decomposes the World ,and into its Constituents and then Construct a new
790World From the Materials and Constituents which are Eternal.So no Wolrd is Eternal. But to
791each and every world there is a World Prior to it.
792The series is infinite in the past. But in the Infinite Series of Worlds in the direction of Past
793Tense, there is no Eternal World , yet the Material from which each Non Eternal World is
794composed and Constituted is Eternal. [Let this series be called Series A]
795Mathematical Representation
796A1,A2,A3,A4,Ai,.. , iN
797N IS SET OF NATURAL NUMBERS.
798A1 is the present World.
799WHERE NUMBERS INCRESES IN DIRECTION OF PAST. A2 IS PRIOR TO A1 ETC.
800LET CALL EACH WORLD OF SERIES A AS Ai TERM [NON ETERNAL TERM]
801There is no need to comment on this view since the Eternity Of Materials Of the World is in
806and is Made from a Previously Made Material. [Let this series be called Series B]
807So the Series Of Non Eternal Materials is Infinite in the Past , but there is no Eternal
808Material.
809MATHEMATICAL PRESENTATION
810B1,B2,B3,B4,Bi, ,i N,
811N IS SET OF NATURAL NUMBERS
812 WHERE NUMBERS INCRESES IN DIRECTION OF PAST. B2 IS PRIOR TO B1 ETC.
103Page 27 of 28
104
Page 28 of 28
105
106
813B1 is the Materail of present World.
814
815B
LET CALL EACH MATERIAL OF SERIES B AS Bi TERM [NON ETERNAL TERM] OF SERIES
816
817As Pandit Diyanand claimed that nothing can be made from nothingness, this series DOES
819Yet it does not Imply the Eternity Of any Not Divine Being .
820THERE ARE FIVE THINGS COMMON IN BOTH SERIES:=
8211] NO SERIES HAS ANY ETERNAL TERM.
8222] NO SERIES HAS ANY FIRST TERM IN THE DIRECTION OF PAST
8233] TO EACH AND EVERY Ai , Ai+1 is PRIOR TO IT.
8244] TO EACH AND EVERY Bi THERE IS Bi+1 PRIOR TO IT.
8255] THERE CAN BE NO OBJECTION WHICH IS VALID ON SERIES B BUT INVALID ON SERIES A.
826SO THE QUESTION IS WHY TO ACCEPT THE FIRST AND TO REJECT THE SECOND AND ON
827WHAT GROUNDS.
828A QUESTION ABOUT VEDAS:829EITHER EACH ONE OF THE VEDAS IS DEITY OR NO VEDA IS THE DEITY.
830IF EACH ONE OF THE VEDAS IS DEITY THEN THERE ARE FOUR DISTINCT DEITIES SEINCE
832IF NO VEDA IS DEITY THAT WHAT IS THE MATERIAL OF VEDAS SINCE DIVINE OUSIA CANNOT
833BE THE MATERIAL OF ANY THING SINCE IT IS IMMETERIAL, AND NEITHER MATTER NOT
834MATERIAL.
835Conclusion:=
836It is discussed on the Grounds Of Dianandi System that Eternity of the World or Things
838In this discussion different works of Arya Samajis are discussed . We have copied
839arguments about Eternity of Matterials constituting the World [eg Paramanu.Spirits etc],
840leaving the unrelated parts.
841
842=
843
107Page 28 of 28
108