Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
80
ISSN
0976-9595
Research Article
81
82
Table 1: Mortality percentage of red flour beetle, T. castaneum treated with different plant extracts by Film residue method
Name
of the
Plants
CS1
AI1
TI1
PG1
CS2
AI3
Concentration
(g/cm2)
196.48
392.95
785.91
1571.83
Control
196.48
392.95
785.91
1571.83
Control
196.48
392.95
785.91
1571.83
Control
196.48
392.95
785.91
1571.83
Control
196.48
392.95
785.91
1571.83
Control
196.48
392.95
785.91
1571.83
Control
No of
Insect
used
No of Insect dead
24 hrs
84
90
96
96
0
60
60
78
78
48 hrs
90
90
96
96
0
66
90
90
96
72 hrs
96
96
96
96
0
66
72
90
96
120
30
42
72
72
66
66
90
96
72
90
96
96
120
30
30
54
54
30
30
54
54
30
36
72
72
30
66
66
78
0
42
60
60
60
0
66
72
96
96
0
72
84
84
90
0
84
90
96
96
0
72
84
84
90
0
120
120
120
120
90
92
96
96
0
64
74
86
90
0
56
66
86
88
0
30
32
60
60
0
60
76
86
90
0
62
76
76
80
0
% of Average
Mortality
% Corrected Mortality
75
76.66
80
80
75
76.66
80
80
53.33
61.66
71.66
75
53.33
61.66
71.66
75
46.66
55
71.66
73.33
46.66
55
71.66
73.33
25
26.66
50
50
25
26.66
50
50
50
63.33
71.66
75
50
63.33
71.66
75
51.66
63.33
63.33
66.66
51.66
63.33
63.33
66.66
83
Table 2. 2-values, regression equations, LD50 and 95% confidence limits of some indigenous medicinal plant extracts against T.
castaneum, a stored grain insect pests after 24, 48 and 72 h of treatment
Plant
extracts
CS 1
AI1
TI1
PG1
CS2
AI3
Hrs after
treatment
Test insect
24 h
48 h
72 h
T. castaneum
T. castaneum
T. castaneum
24 h
48 h
72 h
24 h
48 h
72 h
24 h
48 h
72 h
24 h
48 h
72 h
24 h
48 h
72 h
T. castaneum
T. castaneum
T. castaneum
T. castaneum
T. castaneum
T. castaneum
T. castaneum
T. castaneum
T. castaneum
T. castaneum
T. castaneum
T. castaneum
T. castaneum
T. castaneum
T. castaneum
Regression equations
2- values for
Heterogeneit*
0.810
1.713
0.877
2.205
4.111
1.093
5.195
3.734
2.886
4.222
4.222
7.599
9.380
3.683
0.810
3.352
0.874
0.874
Y= 4.413+0.465X
Y= 4.305+0.492X
Y= 4.34+0.64X
Y= 3.80+0.505X
Y= 3.64+0.708X
Y= 1.70+1.57X
Y= 0.73+1.56X
Y= 3.01+0.89X
Y= 3.88+0.64X
Y= 2.63+0.718X
Y= 2.63+0.718X
Y= 1.61+1.17X
Y= 2.12+1.05X
Y= 3.03+0.90X
Y= 4.413+0.465X
Y= 3.87+0.38X
Y= 4.34+0.42X
Y= 4.34+0.42X
LD50
(g.cm-2)
Upper
20.64
24.43
10.74
234.578
91.807
155.13
732.538
178.741
58.368
1944.40
1944.40
774.22
557.87
153.32
20.64
990.26
38.02
38.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
36.99
16.51
59.75
579.51
80.14
3.95
1182.78
1182.78
617.66
425.44
64.66
0.00
495.08
0.00
0.00
89.05
97.72
77.92
405.10
174.99
242.74
974.10
267.11
135.43
6493.45
6493.45
1025.98
730.78
234.95
89.05
126631.03
137.92
137.92
Extract
Alkaloid
Hexane
Methanol
Water
Hexane
Methanol
Water
Hexane
Methanol
Water
Hexane
Methanol
Water
Hexane
Methanol
Water
Hexane
Methanol
Water
Steroid
+
++
+
-
Flavonoid
Tannins
+
++
+
++
++
+
++
++
++
++
++
++
+++
+
Saponins
+
+
+
+
++
++
-
+ = presence, -= Absence
7.
8.
9.
5. REFERENCES
10.
11.
1.
12.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Dethier VG, Barton Browne L, Smith CN. J Econ Ent, 1960; 53:
134-136.
Schoonhoven IM. Entomol Exp and Appl, 1982; 31: 57-69.
Mordue AJ. Azadirachtin - A review of its mode of action in
insects. In: Kleeberg H (Ed.). Practice Oriented Results on Use and
Production of Neem-Ingredients and Pheromones Germany, 1998; pp.
1-4.
Arnason JT, Philogene BJR, Morand P. Insecticides of plants
origin. American Chemical Society Symposium Series Vol. 387.
Washington, 1989.
Jilani G, Su HCF. J Econ Entomol, 1983; 76:154-157.
Isman MB. Crop Prot, 2000; 19: 603-608.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
84