Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
School of Biological Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800 Minden, Penang, Malaysia
Malaysian Institute of Pharmaceuticals and Nutraceuticals, MOSTI, Malaysia
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 6 January 2012
Received in revised form 18 September 2012
Accepted 27 September 2012
Available online 10 October 2012
Keywords:
Biodegradable polymers
Alkaline digestion
P(3HB-co-3HHx)
PHA recovery
Cupriavidus necator
Industrial application
a b s t r a c t
Five strategies (Experiment A, B, C, D and E) for recovery of PHA were carried out in 10 L bioreactor using
cells which contained 68 wt% PHA and 3 mol% 3HHx. NaCl (8 g/L), NaOH (0.1 M) and ethanol (20% v/v)
were used in the treatments. Separated treatments of NaCl and NaOH with ethanol (Experiment D)
was found as the best strategy with high PHA recovery (95 wt%) and purity (90 wt%). Although, combined
treatments (Experiment B) obtained the highest PHA purity (97 wt%) severe degradation of polymer was
detected. The molecular weight (Mw) was reduced to almost half (2.8 105 Da) compared to polymer
extracted using chloroform (4.6 105 Da). In addition, pre-treatment using NaCl was found to increase
the PHA recovery and purity to 97.7 wt% and 97.5 wt%, respectively. Also, no signicant changes in the
PHA recovery and purity were observed when lyophilized cell or wet cell was used. Further characterizations of recovered polymers were carried out using GPC, DSC, TGA and tensile machine.
2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Nowadays, plastics are the most important things in our daily
life because many things are created from plastic including in the
household, industrial, food sector and also in medical applications.
Consequently, collection and waste of plastics can threat the environment because synthetic plastics are toxic and non-biodegradable [1]. The petrochemical-based plastics or conventional
plastics persist for many years after disposal [2]. Therefore, many
researches were done to nd out solution to replace the nondegradable plastic to biodegradable plastics or polymers. Polyhydoxyalkanoates (PHAs) are produced by various microorganisms
under stress condition through fermentation. Currently, over 150
different monomers of PHAs have been identied with molecular
masses ranging from 50,000 to 1,000,000 Da [3]. Different monomers of PHA can be manipulated using different types of bacteria
(Gram-positive or Gram-negative), fermentation conditions, fermentation modes, substrates used, recombinant gene expression
and protein engineering of PHA biosynthetic [3,4].
112
S.N.S. Anis et al. / Separation and Purication Technology 102 (2013) 111117
recovery of PHA with low energy input and short time will greatly
reduce the cost and this should be taken into consideration especially in the large scale recovery process. In addition, the percentage of recovery and purity must be determined after the recovery
process. A high recovery and purity of recovered polymer with no
reduction of molecular weight represents the efciency of the
recovery process. Furthermore, the thermal and mechanical properties of the recovered polymer must be determined to ensure that
the polymer does not undergo any deterioration after recovery
process.
The aim of this study is to develop a simple, economical and
environmental friendly procedure for recovering biodegradable
polymer from bacterial cells using NaOH digestion. NaOH in alkaline conditions causes saponication of the lipid layer in the cell
wall and increases the permeability of cell membrane that helps
release the nonpolymeric protein material [5,7,9]. Recombinant
bacterium, Cupriavidus necator harboring pBBR1MCS-C2 plasmid
polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) synthase gene was used for the production of copolymer P(3HB-co-3HHx) from crude palm kernel
oil (CPKO). For large volume recovery, different strategies were
studied to develop economical large volume recovery process. Several centrifugation steps could be avoided in order to reduce the
energy consumption. The most efcient procedure was selected
based on the improvement condition with high quality product.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Microorganism
Recombinant bacterium,
C. necator PHB4 harboring
pBBR1MCS-C2 plasmid/ Chromobacterium sp. PHA synthase gene
was used for the production of copolymer P(3HB-co-3HHx). The recombinant C. necator used in this study was kindly provided by
Prof. Sudesh Kumar from Eco-biomaterial laboratory, Universiti
Sains Malaysia.
2.2. Culture media
Nutrient-rich medium composed of (g/L): meat extract, 10;
peptone, 10; yeast extract, 2; was used for enrichment of recombinant C. necator. The medium for PHA production was a mineral salt
medium (MSM) composed of (g/L): KH2PO4, 2.8; Na2HPO4.12H2O,
3.32; urea, 0.54. Medium components were dissolved in distilled
water and autoclaved at 121 C for 20 min. CPKO was autoclaved
separately and added to medium giving an initial concentration
of 20 g/L. 1 mL/L of trace elements solution and 1.4 g/L of MgSO47H2O were added to the medium after sterile ltration. Composition of the trace elements solution was (g/L in 0.1 N HCl):
CoCl26H2O, 0.22; FeCl3, 9.7; CaCl2, 7.8; NiCl26H2O, 0.12; CrCl3
6H2O, 0.11; CuSO45H2O, 0.16. Kanamycin was added to the
medium giving a concentration of 50 mg/L for maintenance of
the plasmid in strain PHB-4/ pBBR1MCS-C2.
2.3. Production of P(3HB-co-3HHx) in 150 L fermenter
Approximately, two loopfuls of C. necator cells from NR agar
were transferred into the NR medium. The preculture was incubated for 12 h at 30 C and then transferred to 500 mL ask containing 100 mL of NR medium for another 18 h. After cultivation,
10% (v/v) of inoculums from NR were transferred into 7 L of NR
medium as preparation for seed culture and was further incubated
for 12 h. PHA biosynthesis was carried out in a 150 L fermenter
(BIOSTAT D, B-Braun) with the initial working volume set at 70 L.
The cultures were incubated for 72 h at 30 C. The agitation speed
was xed at 250 rpm with air ow rate of 1 vvm. During fermenta-
tion, 20 g/L of CPKO was fed at 12, 24 and 36 h time interval. Additional magnesium sulfate, 1.4 g/L; trace elements, 1 mL/L and urea;
2 g/L were also added at the 24 h time interval. The cells were harvested by centrifugation and washed with hexane to remove excess oils and nally rinsed with distilled water. The bacterial
cells obtained from this fermentation were used throughout the
recovery experiments.
2.4. Recovery of P(3HB-co-3HHx) in bioreactor
The recovery process using total volume of 10 L was carried out
using improved parameters established in previous experiments
(data not shown). The bacterial cells obtained from the 70 L fermentation were adjusted with distilled water until the cell concentration of 10 g/L was obtained. Approximately, 4 g/L of NaOH
(0.1 M) was added into the bacterial suspension and stirred at
350 rpm for 1 h. Then, the suspensions were centrifuged, washed
and polished using 20% (v/v) of ethanol for 3 h. The recovered polymers were freeze-dried and analyzed using GC.
2.5. Recovery of P(3HB-co-3HHx) using different cells conditions
The recovery of P(3HB-co-3HHx) using NaOH was carried out
using three cells conditions; lyophilized cells, wet cells (without
culture medium) and wet cells with the culture medium (without
centrifugation). The cell concentrations were xed at 10 g/L and
treated with 0.1 M of NaOH at 30 C for 1 h. The recovered polymers were centrifuged, washed and polished using 20% (v/v) of
ethanol for 3 h before freeze-dried.
2.6. Recovery of P(3HB-co-3HHx) with NaCl pre-treatment
The pre-treatment of NaCl was carried out before treatment
using NaOH. The cells concentration was xed at 10 g/L while
the concentrations of NaCl were varied from 2 to 10 g/L and incubated at 30 C for 3 h. The recovered polymers were centrifuged,
washed and polished using 20% (v/v) of ethanol for 3 h before
freeze-dried.
2.7. Recovery of P(3HB-co-3HHx) in bioreactor using different
strategies
The bacterial cells obtained through the 70 L fermentation was
harvested and separated from the culture broth by centrifugation.
Only the cell pellets were used in this experiment. Several strategies for the recovery of P(3HB-co-3HHx) were developed (Fig. 1)
and tested. The pure polymers obtained from each recovery process were further characterized using GPC, DSC, TGA and tensile
machine.
2.8. Analytical procedures
2.8.1. Gas chromatography
The PHA concentration, composition, recovery and purity were
determined using gas chromatography (GC) (Shimadzu GC-2014)
based on method by [10]. Approximately 58 mg of extracted polymer were subjected to methanolysis in the presence of chloroform
with methanol and sulfuric acid [85%:15% (v/v)]. The reaction mixture was incubated at 100 C for 3 h. The organic layer containing
the reaction products was separated, dried over Na2SO4, and analyzed by GC. Caprylic methyl ester (CME) 1:500 was used as the
internal standard.
2.8.2. Determination of molecular weight
The molecular mass data for the polyesters were obtained by
gel permeation chromatography (GPC) machine using a Waters
S.N.S. Anis et al. / Separation and Purication Technology 102 (2013) 111117
113
Centrifugation
Freeze-drying
Experiment A
Experiment B
Experiment C
Experiment D
Experiment E
Fig. 1. The ow of recovery process using various strategies.
Model 600E (Multi Solvent Delivery System), Waters 410 refractive-index detector with Waters 746-Data Module PLgel Mixed C
column (Polymer Laboratories, Ltd., UK). The polymer samples
were dissolved in chloroform to a nal concentration of 2.0 mg/
mL and ltered through 0.45 lm PTFE membranes (Millipore,
USA). The ow rate was at 1.0 mL/min. Polystyrene standards with
low polydispersity (1.1) (Polymer Laboratories, Ltd., UK) were
used to plot the standard curve.
2.8.3. Tensile test
The mechanical properties of the P(3HB-co-3HHx) were characterized using tensile machine (GOTECH A1-3000) to determine the
tensile strength, Youngs modulus and elongation to break. Tensile
test pieces with 4 mm width, 45 mm gauge length were cut from
polymer lms using steel ASTM regulation punches. The crosshead speed used is 10 mm/min. A minimum of ve replicates were
tested for each polymer sample.
114
S.N.S. Anis et al. / Separation and Purication Technology 102 (2013) 111117
2.9. Calculations
The purity and recovery of P(3HB-co-3HHx) were calculated
according to the following equations:
phag
100 w=w%
biomassg
phag
%Recovery P
100 w=w%
PHAg
%Purity
For PHA purity, pha(g) represent the amount of PHA in biomass(g) of cells, calculated based on the GC analysis. The PHA
recovery was determined by dividing the amount of recovered
P
PHA, pha(g) with a known amount of PHA in the biomass, PHA(g)
obtained using chloroform extraction method.
3. Results and discussions
3.1. Effect of cell conditions and NaCl pre-treatment
In small scale laboratory processes, the bacterial cells were usually harvested by centrifugation and freeze-dried. However, centrifugation and drying procedure require high energy consumption
and are costly to be carried out in industrial scale [11]. In order
to reduce the production cost, direct recovery of PHA from the culture broth was to be expected. Therefore, the recovery of copolymer P(3HB-co-3HHx) carried out using lyophilized cells, wet cells
and cells with culture broth (without centrifugation). Recombinant
bacterium C. necator PHB4 harboring phaC of Chromobacterium sp.
USM2 was used to synthesize P(3HB-co-3HHx) using CPKO as sole
carbon source. After 72 h of cultivation, 42 g/L of cell biomass with
68 wt% PHA and 3 mol% of 3HHx was obtained. The PHA purity and
recovery of lyophilized cells and wet cells are 80.5 wt% purity with
88.6 wt% recovery and 83.9 wt% purity with 91.1 wt% recovery,
respectively. The results were as shown in Table 1. There was no
signicant difference in lyophilized cells or wet cells using this
treatment. On the other hand, the recovery of cells with culture
broth yields low PHA purity (76.4 wt%) and recovery (68.9 wt%).
Earlier work by [12] has concluded that the drier the bacterial cells,
the easier the recovery process. In addition, [11] also reported that
the purity of recovered polymer would decrease compared to the
recovered polymer using lyophilized cells. Direct recovery from
fermentation also has a drawback due to the high viscosity of the
fermentation broth during the recovery process. Besides that, the
residual oil from the fermentation also decreases the NaOH concentration and lessens its efciency to digest NPCM. It was suggested that in direct recovery using chemical digestion method
must involve shaking, heat treatment and washing [13]. However,
as heating is a crucial step, it requires high energy, thus it is not
suitable for large volume recovery. In our study, both lyophilized
cells and wet cells produce desirable results for PHA purity and
recovery yield. In the subsequent experiment, wet cells were used
for PHA recovery.
Pre-treatment of bacterial cells before NaOH treatment is another method to increase the PHA purity and recovery as it is done
Table 1
Recovery of copolymer P(3HB-co-3HHx) using different type of cells.
Table 2
Effect sodium chloride (NaCl) pre-treatment on the recovery of copolymer P(3HB-co3HHx).
Type of cells
Purity
(wt%)a
Recovery
(wt%)a
Residual NPCM
(wt%)a
Lyophilized cell
Wet cell
Wet cell with broth
80.5 4.4
83.9 3.0
76.4 2.2
88.6 4.3
91.1 2.7
68.9 2.1
19.5 4.4
16.1 3.0
23.6 2.2
NaCl
concentration (g/L)
Purity
(wt%)a
Recovery
(wt%)a
Residual
NPCM (wt%)a
Controlb
2
4
6
8
10
82.2 3.7
87.8 2.2
93.1 2.8
93.0 4.3
97.7 1.6
94.8 0.7
83.9 1.2
82.3 2.6
84.0 4.9
86.2 3.3
97.5 2.0
97.1 1.8
17.8 3.7
12.2 2.2
6.9 2.8
7.0 4.3
2.3 1.6
5.2 0.7
115
S.N.S. Anis et al. / Separation and Purication Technology 102 (2013) 111117
Table 3
Recovery of copolymer P(3HB-co-3HHx) in bioreactor using different strategies.
Experiment
Control
A
B
C
D
E
Purity (wt%)a
ND
82.7 2.5
97.0 1.1
95.1 2.7
90.8 2.6
87.5 2.4
Recovery (wt%)a
ND
94.4 2.8
86.4 1.0
79.5 2.3
95.3 1.2
70.3 1.9
ND
17.3 2.5
3.0 1.1
4.9 2.7
9.2 2.6
12.5 2.4
Molecular Weight
Mw ( 105)b(Da)
4.6 0.1
4.9 0.5
2.8 0.0
3.2 0.1
4.9 0.1
4.9 0.0
3.2 0.2
3.1 0.5
2.3 0.2
2.8 0.1
3.0 0.1
3.5 0.1
Fig. 2. Scanning electron micrograph of bacterial cells 9 (a) before treatment and
recovered polymers after (b) experiment B and (c) experiment D. Observed under
Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) (10,000 magnication).
116
S.N.S. Anis et al. / Separation and Purication Technology 102 (2013) 111117
Fig. 3. Transmission electron micrograph of bacterial cells (a) before treatment and
(b) recovered polymers after treatment using recovery process by experiment D.
Observed under Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM) (10,000 magnication).
determined with DSC and TGA (Table 4). The melting temperature
(Tm) of polymers recovered by experiment D (146 C) is similar to
polymers recovered by chloroform extraction (149 C). However,
the enthalpy of fusion of polymers recovered by using experiment
D (49.6 J/g) was slightly higher than by using chloroform extraction (46.7 J/g). This indicates that the crystallinity of this polymer
was slightly higher than by using chloroform extraction. In fact,
polymer extracted through chloroform extraction will dissolve in
the solvent and later is re-crystallized through non solvent precipitation. On the other hand, chemical digestion polymer is recovered
as crude granule from cell cytoplasm, thus have no chance for recrystallization [22]. Decomposition temperatures (Td) of recovered
polymers for each experiment were determined using TGA. Experiment D and E gave Td of 265 C and 260 C, respectively. These
decomposition temperatures were almost similar with the control
(278.3 C). Whereas, Td below than 245 C was obtained for experiment A, B, and C and they showed signicant reduction compared
to the control.
The mechanical properties of the recovered polymers such as
tensile strength (MPa), Youngs modulus (MPa), and elongation to
break (%) were determined using tensile machine (Table 4). The
values could only be obtained for experiment D and E. The results
were compared with recovered polymers obtained by chloroform
extraction. However, the recovered polymers from experiment D
and E showed a slight decrease in tensile strength (MPa), Youngs
modulus (MPa), and elongation to break (%) compared to polymers
extracted using chloroform. This was perceived to be due to the
impurities in the chemically recovered polymer, such as CPKO
and cell debris that can affect on the tensile, as compared to the
solvent-extraction PHA [18,23]. Since the percentage of these
impurities is low, further chloroform extraction is not necessary
for certain applications, such as for building materials, binders,
paints and paper coating [23]. However, for biomedical purpose
these polymers must be pure as most biomedical application involves contact in human body and the purity of the material is
an important criterion [23,24]. The polymers recovered using
NaOH treatment can be further treated using other solvents, since
only a small amount of solvents would be required to increase the
PHA purity to as high as 99 wt% [25].
4. Conclusion
Industrialized recovery and purication of copolymer P(3HB-co3HHx) from recombinant bacterium strain of C. necator PHB4
using the PHA synthase of Chromobacterium sp. USM2 are possible
using a low cost and environmental friendly recovery method.
High PHA purity and recovery of polymers was achieved using
the simple, inexpensive and efcient recovery process using re-
Table 4
Thermal and mechanical properties of recovered copolymer P(3HB-co-3HHx) in bioreactor using different strategies.
Experiment
Thermal properties
Tg (C)
Control
A
B
C
D
E
1.7 0.7
17.9 0.7
22.8 0.3
18.6 2.0
0.5 0.1
1.1 0.4
Tm (C)
Mechanical properties
b
149.0 0.3
123.3 0.6
116.9 0.2
120.2 2.7
146.0 0.1
143.7 0.3
DHm (J/g)
46.7 2.5
17.6 2.1
19.1 0.8
16.9 3.0
49.6 0.1
51.1 1.0
Td (C)
Elongation (%)e
278.3 16.1
245.0 0.0
240.0 0.0
240.0 0.0
265.0 0.0
260.0 0.0
16.0 1.4
ND
ND
ND
8.4 1.6
6.1 1.5
51.4 5.1
ND
ND
ND
23.0 4.8
16.0 5.2
3.3 0.4
ND
ND
ND
0.9 0.2
0.8 0.2
S.N.S. Anis et al. / Separation and Purication Technology 102 (2013) 111117
[11]
[12]
Acknowledgements
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23]
[24]
[25]
117