Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
The
Riverside
Anthology
of the
African
American
Literary
Tradition
GENERAL EDITOR
Iff . ..'
H31
* . ,,
t i *n
-JT lO '.IP
n
,n
-16. "' ;/
3;y iJ
Bernard W. 8e/l
Professor of English
.i^ ir> i IT- i
' u
The Pennsylvania
State University
J
' - , -i
rtf '; i"
Jrudier.Harris,
,
. .
91 !1L
_/. Car/yle S/tterson Professor of English
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
'u-WillianrJ. Harris .'
*
Associate Professor of English
The Pennsylvania State University
'r T y?
R. Baxter Miller
. Professor'of English and Director of the Institute for African American Studies
f, University of Georgia Qr
, it ,j,
J,!l JU
NEW YORK
92
25
PHILLIS WHEATLEY
(1753?-1784)
There is probably no more astounding account of emerging artistic genius in all of
American literary history than that of the eighteenth-century African American poet
Phillis Wheatley. Kidnapped from Africa when she was less than a decade old and sold
on a Boston auction block when she was near death, the child soon mastered both the
verbal and written language of her enslavers. By the time she was sixteen, she had become the best-known African writer in the colonies. Before her tragic and untimely
death at thirty years of age, she was lionized in England, Europe, and New England,
and she, was paraded before the new republic's political leadership and the old empire's aristocracy. As the abolitionists' illustration of the African's intellectual potential, Phillis Wheatley's name was a guilt-convicting reminder to all literate colonists;
her achievements were a catalyst for the colony's fledgling antislavery movement, and
her presence and writings were an inspiration to every colonial slave.
Born in West Africa around 1753, Phillis Wheatley was abducted into slavery
when she was about five or six years old and put on a slave ship headed for the
Boston docks with a shipment of "refugee" slaves who, because of age or physical
frailty, were unsuited for rigorous labor in the West Indian or southern colonies.
Purchased in 1761 by an upper-class Boston couple, John and Susannah Wheatley,
the girl, at about seven years old, was of slight build and quite sickly, apparently not
adjusting well to the cold New England climate. Shedding her teeth, the waif had
"no other covering than a quantity of dirty carpet about her." Among the final
"items" purchased, Phillis was bought for "a trifle." Believing her to be terminally ill,
the captain of the slave ship wanted to gain at least a small profit before she died.
John Wheatley, a successful entrepreneur, owned several, slaves. He claimed
that they purchased the child because his wife "wanted a Black girl to train as a domestic." The Wheatleys' daughter, Mary, began to teach theology and literature to
the child worker to whom they had given the name "Phillis." The child was soon
spared the menial household chores and was not allowed to associate with the other
Wheatley slaves. Instead, she became a constant companion of Susannah Wheatley
who, recognizing a prodigy, taught her to read and write English and Latin as well as
how to study the Bible. She was soon immersed in "astronomy, geography, history,
British literature (particularly John Milton, John Dryden, and Alexander Pope), and
the Greek and Latin classics of Virgil, Ovid, Terence, and Homer."
She wrote her first letter to the Mohegan leader, Reverend Samson Occom, in
1765. However, neither this letter nor her first, poem, which was sent to Reverend
John Sewall of Boston's Old South Church, are extant. At services at the new South
Congregational Church, which she attended with the Wheatleys, she embraced the
religious teachings of her day, which included the idea of God as the ultimate and
final source of power.
93
94
nent and wealthy benefactors in the influential Clapmah society. These meetings
allowed this wellspring of leadership in the antislavery movement to further dissemJ
inate Phillis's poetry to an ever-widening audience and to use her work to decry the
enslavement of such representative creative potential.
Phillis Wheatley" s London-published volume, included Christian elegies; political and patriotic pieces; and several poems about religion, morals, nature, imagination, and memory. It also contained^ highly original'English translation of Ovid
from the. Latin. Perhaps more.important, several of her poems embodied racially
self-conscious lines. For instance, in her tribute "To the Right Honorable William
Legge, Earl of Dartmouth," Wheatley expresses her personal desire and struggle for
freedom.as an enslaved African in America. Passionately, she informs the Earl that
her objection to,Britain's oppressions of the American colonies stems mainly from
the fact that because of "seeming cruel Fate," she was once "snatch'd from/Afric's
fancy'd happy Seat."
In 1774, hearing that Mrs. Wheatley was ill, Phillis returned to Boston. Not long
after her^ return, Mrs. Wheatley died. Phillis was formally freed some, three months
later. Shortly thereafter, when Mr. Wheatley died and the remaining members of the
family either died or moved away, Phillis became a free and vulnerable unattached
African in the American British colonies. That year, she wrote a final letter to
Occom in which she stated, "In every human Breast, God has implanted a Principle,
which we call Love of Freedom; it is impatient of Oppression, and pants focDeliverance; and by Leave of our Modern Egyptians I will assert, that' the same Principle
lives in us." Wheatley's forceful declarationwritten only after she was freedfrbm
slaveryspeaks,for her people stillr:held in bondage as well as for enslaved, people
throughout the world.
On April 1,1778, she married the man she had been seeing for about five years, a
free black named John Peters. A freelance lawyer for black people before Massachusetts tribunals, Peters appears to have been an entrepreneur before and after the Revolutionary- War. Apparently quite successful before the war, he kept a grocery store
and at various times exchanged trade as a baker and barber. There is a record of Peters
paying taxes on a house of above-average value. Early scholars render an unflattering
depiction of Peters. Others, including Sidney Kaplan and Arthur Schorriberg, describe
him as an assertive black man who simply did not patronize white people.
M. A.-Richmond and Margaretta Matilda Odell cast Peters as ambitious, shiftless, arrogant, and proud, and Odell states that distant relatives of the Wheatleys
held Peters directly responsible for Phillis's death. But in an era that only valued
black male brawn, Peters's business acumen was simply unacceptable. Charles Akers
argues that "Peters was a free black man of considerable ability and personal charm
who appears not to have deserved his reputation as a ne'er-do-well whose irresponsibility contributed to his talented wife's untimely death."
The couple had three children between 1779 and 1783. To avoid the violence of
the Revolutionary War, Phillis and Peters moved temporarily from Boston to Wilmington5, Massachusetts, shortly after their marriage. Richmond points out that economic conditions in the colonies during and after the war were very harsh, not only
for slaves but for free blacks as well. White people especially resisted the entrance of
free black people into the job market. Thus, economic recession and racial discrimination contributed to the postwar poverty that the family suffered.
95
96
ley's use of biblical terms such as "salvation," "Cain," "light/' and "Christian," to
discuss eighteenth1 century slavery. Again, the use of this type of biblical language
was the only safe way in which a slave writer could speak against his or her enslavers.
Using Christian'symbolism to speak to an audience that considered America to be a
Christian society not only legitimized the African American "slave writer as an acceptable contemporary 'artistit was" the only possible vehicle for those African
Americans seeking to invoke Christian conscience.
'
Another, critic offering revisionist theories of Wheatleys work is John C.1
Shields. In "Phillis Wheatley's Use of Classicism," he thoroughly discusses Wheatley's 'unusually extensive knowledge of the Greek'and Roman classics'and the ways
in which she uses them to authenticate her poetic gifts and to allude to her ethnic
identity and to innate childhood memories of familial sun- worship when "her
mother poured out water before the sun at his rising." Shields convincingly argues
that "Wheatley's .syncretism of solar worship, Christianity and-classical mythology
demonstrates-a substantial and even provocative use of classicism." He concludes
that
.
J*
What Wheatley essentially does, then, is to decide that this worldwhich allows slavery to remain legitimate, is unsatisfactory to her; so she manipulates the conventions of neoclassicism to build in her poems another, acceptable world.... Not only
was Wheatley vitally concerned for the plight of her enslaved brothers and sisters,
but she fervently sought her own freedom, both in this world and in the next. Sor
complete was her absorption in the struggle for freedom that this endeavor, governed her conception of poetry, causing her to be no more imitative than any other
good student and writer of literature.
Wheatley's detractors disregard these accomplishments; they count it as a light
thing that she met and had correspondence with the first president of the United
States, that she had private meetings with Benjamin Franklin, and that she was even
scheduled to have an audience'with King George III. They also discount another
crucial observation: No less a personage than Thomas Jefferson believed that her au^
thenticity as an African! American female poet was such-a threat to the sanctity of
slavery that he denounced'her work as being "beneath contempt" and dismissed it
as imitative of classic eighteenth-century poetry. He also castigated her writing on
the grounds that it was impossible for an African woman to have the intellectual or
artistic capacity to produce creative art. The statesman concluded that "Religion, indeed, has produced a Phillis Whately*[sic]; but it could not produce a poet."
Another indication of the extreme racism in the eighteenth-century North was
the refusal of the colonial aristocracy to raise the money needed,to publish Phillis's
first book, even after its astounding success in London. The first American edition was
not published until 1787, three years after her death. According to William Robinson
in Reconstructing American Literature (1983), "While her secondedition, published as
Poems, went through at least four London printings for a run of about 1200 copies,' in
America the same volume fared poorly early on," Even though'she was identified as a
black poet during her lifetime, Boston printers, who advertised'the first American
publication other book, would not credit "ye performances to be bya Negro."
Critical revaluation of Wheatley and her poetry began during the early years of
the contemporary women's movement when eighteen'African American^ women
"i
poets held the PhillisAVheatley Poetry Festival atjackson State College, Mississippi,
in 1973. Such writers.as.Margaret Walker, Sonia Sanchez, June Jordan, Audre Lorde,
Lucille Clifton, Maya Angelou, and Alice Walker paid tribute to the poet and commemorated the two-hundredth anniversary of the publication of Poems. Since then,
Wheatley has been regarded as the foremother of the African American and
women's literary traditions. To date, Wheatley's Poems has been reprinted more
than twenty-four times in the United States and Europe, and selections have appeared regularly in literature, anthologies. This resurgence, of activity around Wheatley's work will surely yield further significant revelations about,the depth and complexity of her work and the missing facets of her life.
97
98
"*
>
f
I
To the University of Cambridge, in New-England
While an intrinsic ardor prompts to write,
The muses promise to assist my pen;
'Twas not long since I left my native shore
The land of errors, and Egyptian gloom:
Father of mercy, 'twas thy gracious hand
5
Brought me in safety from those dark abodes.
|
.
j
I
[
[
to
15
20
25
30
Philis's [sic]. Reply to the Answer in our last by the Gentleman in the Navy
r
40
10
15
20
25
30
101