Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
differences in packing and for 751(a)(1) of the Act: (1) the cash–deposit Department) initiated sunset reviews of
movement expenses in accordance with rate for RDM/CPFL will be the rate the antidumping duty orders on certain
sections 773(a)(6)(A) and (B) of the Act. established in the final results of review; stainless steel butt–weld pipe fittings
We also made adjustments for (2) for previously reviewed or (pipe fittings) from Japan, South Korea,
differences in circumstances of sale in investigated companies not mentioned and Taiwan pursuant to section 751(c)
accordance with section 773(a)(6)(C)(iii) above, the cash–deposit rate will of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
of the Act and 19 CFR 351.401. continue to be the company–specific (the Act). On the basis of a notice of
Specifically, we made circumstance–of- rate published for the most recent intent to participate and adequate
sale adjustments by deducting home– period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm substantive responses filed on behalf of
market direct selling expenses from and covered in this review, a prior review, domestic interested parties and no
adding U.S. direct selling expenses to or the less–than-fair–value (LTFV) response from respondent interested
normal value. investigation, but the manufacturer is, parties, the Department conducted
then the cash–deposit rate will be the expedited (120–day) sunset reviews. As
Preliminary Results of Review
rate established for the most recent a result of these sunset reviews, the
As a result of our review, we period for the manufacturer of the Department finds that revocation of the
preliminarily determine that a margin of merchandise; and (4) if neither the antidumping duty orders would be
0.00 percent exists for RDM/CPFL for exporter nor the producer is a firm likely to lead to continuation or
the period December 1, 2003, through covered in this review, a prior review, recurrence of dumping. The dumping
November 30, 2004. or the LTFV investigation, the cash– margins are identified below in the
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.224(b), the deposit rate shall be 17.60 percent, the ‘‘Final Results of Review’’ section of this
Department will disclose to parties all–others rate established in the LTFV notice.
calculations performed in connection investigation. See Notice of Final
with these preliminary results within Determination of Sales at Less Than EFFECTIVE DATE: September 9, 2005.
five days of the date of publication of Fair Value: Silicomanganese from FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
this notice. Any interested party may Brazil, 59 FR 55432 (November 7, 1994). Dana Mermelstein, AD/CVD Operations,
request a hearing within 30 days of These deposit requirements, when Office 6, Import Administration,
publication of this notice. A hearing, if imposed, shall remain in effect until International Trade Administration,
requested, will be held at the main publication of the final results of the U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th
Department building. We will notify next administrative review. Street and Constitution Avenue, NW,
parties of the exact date, time, and place This notice serves as a primary Washington, DC 20230, telephone (202)
for any such hearing. reminder to importers of their 482–1391.
Issues raised in hearings will be responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
limited to those raised in the respective to file a certificate regarding the
case and rebuttal briefs. Case briefs from reimbursement of antidumping duties Background
interested parties may be filed no later prior to liquidation of the relevant
than 30 days after publication of this entries during this review period. On February 2, 2005, the Department
notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to the Failure to comply with this requirement initiated sunset reviews of the
issues raised in case briefs, may be could result in the Secretary’s antidumping duty orders on pipe
submitted no later than five days after presumption that reimbursement of fittings from Japan, Korea, and Taiwan
the deadline for filing case briefs. antidumping duties occurred and the pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act.
Parties who submit case or rebuttal subsequent assessment of double See Initiation of Five–Year (‘‘Sunset’’)
briefs in this proceeding are requested antidumping duties. Reviews, 69 FR 69891 (Feb. 2, 2005).
to submit with each argument a We are publishing this notice in The Department received notices of
statement of the issue and a brief accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and intent to participate from four domestic
summary of the argument with an 777(i)(1) of the Act. interested parties, Flowline Division of
electronic version included. Markovitz Enterprises, Inc. (Flowline),
Dated: September 2, 2005.
The Department will publish a notice Gerlin, Inc. (Gerlin), Shaw Alloy Piping
Barbara E. Tillman,
of final results of this administrative Products, Inc. (formerly Alloy Piping
Acting Assistant Secretary for Import Products, Inc.) (Shaw), and Taylor Forge
review, which will include the results of Administration.
its analysis of issues raised in the case Stainless, Inc. (Taylor Forge)
[FR Doc. E5–4939 Filed 9–8–05; 8:45 am] (collectively, domestic interested
briefs, within 120 days from the date of
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S parties), within the deadline specified
publication of these preliminary results.
in section 351.218(d)(1)(i) of the
Assessment Department’s regulations. Domestic
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE interested parties claimed interested
The Department shall determine, and
U.S. Customs and Border Protection International Trade Administration party status under section 771(9)(C) of
(CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties the Act as U.S. producers of a domestic
on all appropriate entries. Upon [A–588–702, A–580–813, A–583–816] like product. We received a complete
completion of this review, the substantive response from the domestic
Certain Stainless Steel Butt–Weld Pipe interested party within the 30–day
Department will issue appraisement
Fittings from Japan, South Korea, and deadline specified in 19 CFR
instructions directly to the CBP.
Further, the following deposit Taiwan; Final Results of the Expedited 351.218(d)(3)(i). However, we did not
requirements will be effective upon Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping receive any responses from any
publication of the notice of final results Duty Orders respondent interested parties. As a
of administrative review for all AGENCY: Import Administration, result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B)
shipments of silicomanganese entered, International Trade Administration, of the Act and 19 CFR
or withdrawn from warehouse, for Department of Commerce. 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the Department
consumption on or after the date of SUMMARY: On February 2, 2005, the conducted expedited sunset reviews of
publication, as provided by section Department of Commerce (the these orders.
VerDate Aug<18>2005 15:19 Sep 08, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\09SEN1.SGM 09SEN1
53632 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 174 / Friday, September 9, 2005 / Notices
VerDate Aug<18>2005 15:19 Sep 08, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\09SEN1.SGM 09SEN1