Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
and Calcium in
Potatoes
Barry Bull,
Hydro Agri Specialities
September 2003
Tuber
Size
N
P
K
Ca
Mg
S
Mn
B
Zn
Tuber
Nu mber
Tuber
Quality
Skin
Finish
Storage
Quality
Role of
nutrients
in
Potatoes
Nitrogen
Nitrogen
uFor yield
umore
nitrogen
uhigher yields
Nitrogen and tuber size
ulower bulk density
Nitrogen
uFor quality
u high
nitrogen
usplit potatoes
upoor cooking quality
ubrown stains in crisps
uslow skin-set
Sidedressing nitrogen
uSplit applications with one sidedress
u 2/3
N applied at seeding
u 1/3 N applied around tuber initiation
uMore applications
are better
Total N
0
60
90
120
150
Appl. Split
0
60
30+30
90
60+30
30+30+30
120
90+30
60+30+30
150
120+30
90+30+30
t/ha
39.6
47.9
52.2
55.3
58.6
61.8
56.3
61.7
61.9
61.1
59.0
66.1
Suecia 1988
CNTC
Relative Yield
kg/ha
kg/ha
Nitrogen - source
u Ammonium nitrogen
u
u
u
u Nitrate nitrogen
u
u
u
not toxic
efficient
potatoes prefer nitrate
CN vs. AN
Potassium
Potassium
u Increases tuber
number
u Decreases tuber
bruising
u Decreases enzymatic
discolouration
during cooking
u Anti Stress Element
MT/ha
29
28
27
26
25
24
23
22
KNO3
K2SO4
KCl
% damaged tubers
Effect of K on
% damaged tubers
40
35
33,9
30
28
25
26
24,7
20
50
100
150
kg K per ha
200
250
Mc Cains - Trial UK 97
Trial: Basedresser based on KCl just before planting
Topdressing: with KNO3 217 kg/ha <-> AN
170
Number of
tubers 160
bruised
150
(SAC
damage 140
barrell)
130
No KNO3
+KNO3
Trial Mc Cains 97 - UK
Number of peels, necessary to completely remove the bruise
1100
1000
Number of
Peels
900
800
700
No KNO3
+KNO3
H2O
CO2
1.0
0.5
2.5
50
STOMATA OPENING
Water Transpiration
g/g DM/day
Stomata
TRANSPIRATION
1.5
40
30
20
1
% K in DM
Source: Blanchet et Al., 1962
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0
CONTENT OF K (mg/g)
K applied
(lb/A)
Yield
(tons/A)
Foliage Damaged
by Frost (%)
5.9
30
50
6.7
16
100
7.1
Fert applied
Yield
N only before stress
100 %
N only during stress
117 %
Ca & N during stress
167 %
Calcium nitrate relieves heat stress in potatoes
0,1 %
0.2%
0.3%
0,5 %
Surface
area
decayed
90 %
50 %
20 %
nil
50%
% Ca
1 .2
1.0
40%
0 .8
30%
0 .6
20%
0 .4
10%
0 .2
0
U n iv e rs ity o f W I
* B a c te ria l
% W t. L o s s F ro m S o ft R o t
C o rte x (x 1 0 -1 )
P e rid e rm
Ca
nil
84
252
IRS
60 %
37 %
17 %
Peel Ca
0,11 %
0,13 %
0,15 %
0.0070
R2 = 0.5701
0.0090
0.0110
0.0130
0.0150
Ca (% of DM)
% of IBS
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.035
R2 = 0.1851
0.055
0.075
Ca (% of DM)
0.095
Skin
0.115
0,0700
0,0650
0,0600
0,0550
0,0500
0,0450
0,0400
4100
4200
4300
4400
4500
4600
4700
Cooperation
Hydro Agri /
Uni. Goettingen / Bahlsen
z Ca @ 165 kg/ha
z Combination of CN & CaCl
Amm Nit
150
CN.CaCl
100
50
0
Atlantic
Snowden Burbank
Superior
Norland
Amm Nit
CN.CaCl
Atlantic
Snowden Burbank
Superior
Norland
Does it work?
u Example : In Australia - average peel analysis.
u
u
u CN rates used
u
u
u
u
u
u Cost / Benefit
u
u
- Calcium
Atlantic
73
47
Norland
62
54
Superior
70
71
+ Ca = Calcium nitrate
- Ca = Ammonium nitrate
B u lk in g
Planting
Stolon
Grow th
Tuber
Initiation
Suberization
Vine
Kill
Harvest
Ca % DM
Ca applied ppm
Stolon/tuber Main root Peel Tissue
100
100
0,09
100
3000
0,09
3000
100
0,27
Field grown
0,08
Main Roots
u (dyed water travels up to stem not into stolons and
tuber)
Stolon and
tuber roots
take in Ca for the
tubers
Soil Ca moves
upwards into the
leaves
Tuber initiation
Applying CN
Dry apply and incorporate
Calcium Analysis
Tissue analysis:
Tuber analysis:
Tubers need higher levels of Calcium.
z Calcium levels are 3 to 5 times higher in
peel than whole tuber.
z 0.15% Ca in peel will give better skin
finish
z 0.2% Ca in peel gives good disease
tolerance
z Yield:
Tuber
Size
N
P
K
Ca
Mg
S
Mn
B
Zn
Tuber
Nu mber
Tuber
Quality
Skin
Finish
Storage
Quality
Role of
nutrients
in
Potatoes
Nitrates
Calcium
Magnesium
z Yield: no difference
z Quality - Packout
major improvement