Sunteți pe pagina 1din 2

48462 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No.

158 / Wednesday, August 17, 2005 / Notices

4. From where does the community DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION agencies, the aviation industry and
get its bus and passenger rail services; others for safety assessment, planning,
if there is no scheduled bus or passenger Federal Aviation Administration forecasting, cost/benefit analysis, and to
rail service in the community, to where target areas for research.
Agency Information Collection Estimated Annual Burden Hours: An
must residents go to obtain these
Activities Under OMB Review estimated 10,000 hours annually.
services?
5. Where is the nearest airport; if it is AGENCY: Federal Aviation ADDRESS: Send comments to the Office
a local service airport, to what major Administration (FAA), DOT. of Information and Regulatory Affairs,
airport does it carry passengers? ACTION: Notice. Office of Management and Budget, 725
17th Street, NW., Washington, DC
6. What percentage of residents of the SUMMARY: In compliance with the 20503, Attention FAA Desk Officer.
community work outside the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 Comments are invited on: Whether
community; where do these residents U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this notice the proposed collection of information
work? announces that the Information is necessary for the proper performance
7. What are the major elements of the Collection Requests (ICR) abstracted of the functions of the Department,
community’s economy; is the below have been forwarded to the Office including whether the information will
community’s economy improving or of Management and Budget (OMB) for have practical utility; the accuracy of
declining; what Federal, State, or local extension of the currently approved the Department’s estimates of the
plans, if any, are there for economic collections. The ICR describes the burden of the proposed information
nature of the information collection and collection; ways to enhance the quality,
development in the community?
the expected burden. The Federal utility and clarity of the information to
8. If residents leave the community Register Notice with a 60-day comment be collected; and ways to minimize the
for schooling, recreation, health care, or period soliciting comments on the burden of the collection of information
religious worship, what standard of time following collections of information was on respondents, including the use of
is observed in the places where they go published on May 25, 2005, page 30180. automated collection techniques or
for these purposes? DATES: Comments must be submitted on other forms of information technology.
In addition, we will consider any or before September 16, 2005. A Issued in Washington, DC, on August 11,
other information that the county or comment to OMB is most effective if 2005.
local officials believe to be relevant to OMB receives it within 30 days of Judith D. Street,
the proceeding. publication. FAA Information Collection Clearance
In order to proceed efficiently, we ask FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Judy Officer, Information Systems and Technology
Street on (202) 267–9895. Services Staff, ABA–20.
that any county wishing to change its
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: [FR Doc. 05–16328 Filed 8–9–05; 8:45 am]
time zone boundary formally notify
BILLING CODE 4910–13–M
DOT by September 16, 2005. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)
submission should affirmatively take a
position concerning what time zone all 1. Title: Airport Master Record.
Type of Request: Extension of a DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
the county should be placed in and
currently approved collection.
should include specific data supporting OMB Control Number: 2120–0015. Federal Aviation Administration
that position as outlined in our informal Form(s) FAA Form 5010–1, –2, –3,
procedures. All petitions received by Approval of Noise Compatibility
and –5.
September 16, 2005, will be considered Program; Capital City Airport, Lansing,
Affected Public: A total of 19,345
on an expedited schedule. Counties, or MI
airport operators.
other governmental representatives, are Abstract: 49 U.S.C. 329(b) directs the AGENCY: Federal Aviation
free to petition after that date but may Secretary of Transportation to collect Administration, DOT.
not be included in any rulemaking information about civil aeronautics. The ACTION: Notice.
covering those received by September information is required to carry out FAA
16, 2005. missions related to the aviation SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation
industry, flight planning, and airport Administration (FAA) announces its
In addition, this notice announces the findings on the noise compatibility
engineering. The database is the basic
opening of an internet-accessible, public program submitted by Capital Region
source of data for private, state, and
docket that will include a copy of the Airport Authority under the provisions
Federal government aeronautical charts
legislation, correspondence from the and publications. of 49 U.S.C. (the Aviation Safety and
Governor, county petitions, and other Estimated Annual Burden Hours: An Noise Abatement Act, hereinafter
relevant documents concerning the estimated 8,770 hours annually. referred to as ‘‘the Act’’) and 14 CFR
appropriate placement of the time zone 2. Title: General Aviation and Air part 150. These findings are made in
boundary in the State of Indiana. Taxi Activity and Avionics Survey. recognition of the description of Federal
Issued in Washington, DC on August 10, Type of Request: Extension of a and nonfederal responsibilities in
2005. currently approved collection. Senate Report No. 96–52 (1980). On
Jeffrey A. Rosen, OMB Control Number: 2120–0060. February 7, 2005 the FAA determined
Forms: FAA Form 1800–54. that the noise exposure maps submitted
General Counsel.
Affected Public: A total of 30,000 by Capital Region Airport Authority
[FR Doc. 05–16303 Filed 8–16–05; 8:45 am] aircraft owners. under part 150 were in compliance with
BILLING CODE 4910–62–P Abstract: Respondents to this survey applicable requirements. On August 5,
are owners of general aviation aircraft. 2005, the FAA approved the Capital
This information is used by the FAA, City Airport noise compatibility
the National Transportation Safety program. All of the recommendations of
Board (NTSB) and other government the program were approved. No program

VerDate jul<14>2003 13:34 Aug 16, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00094 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\17AUN1.SGM 17AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 158 / Wednesday, August 17, 2005 / Notices 48463

elements relating to new or revised d. Program measures relating to the on and/or off the airport. The FAA
flight procedures for noise abatement use of flight procedures can be completed its review and determined
were proposed by the airport operator. implemented within the period covered that the procedural and substantive
DATES: The effective date of the FAA’s by the program without derogating requirements of the Act and FAR part
approval of the Capital City Airport safety, adversely affecting the efficient 150 have been satisfied. The overall
noise compatibility program is August use and management of the navigable program, therefore, was approved by the
5, 2005. airspace and air traffic control systems, FAA effective August 5, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. or adversely affecting other powers and Outright approval was granted for all
Katherine S. Jones, Community Planner, responsibilities of the Administrator of the specific program elements. These
Detroit Airports District Office, Metro prescribed by law. elements were: Encourage real estate
Specific limitations with respect to sellers to provide notification of
Airport Center, 11677 South Wayne
FAA’s approval of an airport noise potential noise impacts; Encourage local
Road, Suite 107, Romulus, Michigan,
compatibility program are delineated in jurisdictions to require new
Phone (734) 229–2900. Documents
FAR part 150, seciton 150.5. Approval development to provide proper sound
reflecting this FAA action may be
is not a determination concerning the insulation in noise-impacted areas
reviewed at this same location.
acceptability of land uses under Federal,
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This through the building code process;
State, or local law. Approval does not by
notice announces that the FAA has encourage local jurisdictions to enact/
itself constitute an FAA implementing
given its overall approval to the noise continue an environmental review
action. A request for Federal action or
compatibility program for Capital City process that allows for Airport review of
approval to implement specific noise
Airport, effective August 5, 2005. new development to ensure
compatibility measures may be
Under section 47504 of the Act, an consideration of noise issues/impacts;
required, and an FAA decision on the
airport operator who has previously encourage local jurisdictions to develop
request may require an environmental
submitted a noise exposure map may policies related to noise impacts in
assessment of the proposed action.
submit to the FAA a noise compatibility Comprehensive Plans to encourage
Approval does not constitute a
program which sets forth the measures commitment by the FAA to financially compatible development in noise-
taken or proposed by the airport assist in the implementation of the impacted areas; present noise exposure
operator for the reduction of existing program nor a determination that all contours at various public outreach
non-compatible land uses and measures covered by the program are efforts to continue public awareness of
prevention of additional non-compatible eligible for grant-in-aid funding from the community noise exposure; and update
land uses within the area covered by the FAA. Where federal funding is sought, noise exposure maps in five years or
noise exposure maps. The Act requires requests for project grants must be with a significant change in aircraft
such programs to be developed in submitted to the FAA Airports District activity, fleet mix, or physical layout.
consultation with interested and Office in Romulus, Michigan. These determinations are set forth in
affected parties including local Capital Region Airport Authority detail in a Record of Approval signed by
communities, government agencies, submitted to the FAA on February 1, the Associate Administrator of Airports
airport users, and FAA personnel. 2005, the noise exposure maps, on August 5, 2005. The Record of
Each airport noise compatibility descriptions, and other documentation Approval, as well as other evaluation
program developed in accordance with produced during the noise compatibility materials and the documents
Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR) part planning study conducted from 2004 comprising the submittal, are available
150 is a local program, not a Federal through 2005. The Capital City Airport for review at the FAA office listed above
program. The FAA does not substitute noise exposure maps were determined and at the administrative offices of the
its judgment for that of the airport by FAA to be in compliance with Capital Region Airport Authority,
proprietor with respect to which applicable requirements on February 7, Capital City Airport, 4100 Capital City
measures should be recommended for 2005. Notice of this determination was Boulevard, Lansing, Michigan 48906.
action. The FAA’s approval or published in the Federal Register on The Record of Approval also will be
disapproval of FAR part 150 program March 18, 2005 (FR Doc. 05–5341 Filed available on-line at http://www.faa.gov/
recommendations is measured 3–17–05; 8:45 am). arp/environmental/14cfr150/
according to the standards expressed in The Capital City Airport study index14.cfm.
part 150 and the Act and is limited to contains a proposed noise compatibility
Issued in Romulus, Michigan, August 9,
the following determinations: program comprised of actions designed 2005.
a. The noise compatibility program for phased implementation by airport
Winsome A. Lenfert,
was developed in accordance with the management and adjacent jurisdictions
from 2005 to 2008. It was requested that Acting Manager, Detroit Airports District
provisions and procedures of FAR part
Office.
150; the FAA evaluate and approve this
b. Program measures are reasonably material as a noise compatibility [FR Doc. 05–16329 Filed 8–16–05; 8:45 am]
consistent with achieving the goals of program as described in section 47504 BILLING CODE 4910–13–M

reducing existing non-compatible land of the Act. The FAA began its review of
uses around the airport and preventing the program on February 7, 2005 and
the introduction of additional non- DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
was required by a provision of the Act
compatible land uses; to approve or disapprove the program Federal Aviation Administration
c. Program measures would not create within 180 days (other that the use of
an undue burden on interstate or foreign new or modified flight procedures for Receipt of Noise Compatibility
commerce, unjustly discriminate against noise control). Failure to approve or Program and Request for Review
types or classes of aeronautical uses, disapprove such program within the
violate the terms of airport grant 180-day period shall be deemed to be an AGENCY:Federal Aviation
agreements, or intrude into areas approval of such program. Administration, DOT.
preempted by the Federal Government; The submitted program contained six
ACTION: Notice.
and (6) proposed actions for noise mitigation

VerDate jul<14>2003 13:34 Aug 16, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00095 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\17AUN1.SGM 17AUN1

S-ar putea să vă placă și