Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Abstract:
ui
Mathematical Model
Since we are considering the particle to be
sliding down a frictionless surface there is no
work done by any frictional forces. Furthermore
the work done due to the normal force = 0 since the normal force is perpendicular to the
direction of motion (the
[1.10]
displacement) at all points.
i.e.
90
W =Ns cos
W =Ns cos 90
, when
=0
Wf = 0 since F =0
1
Ei=mgh+ mu i2
2
1
2
Ef = mu
2
m- Mass of particle
g Acceleration due to gravity
vi
Setting
ui=0
circular track.
R Radius of circle
Dominic Wynes-Devlin
1
2
mu =mgh
2
u2=2 gh
200759087
[1.11]
1
2
E2 i= m v i
2
v2
Nmgcos =m
R
E2 i=E f
1
1
mu2 = mv i2
2
2
EVALUATE WHEN N =0
Setting N=0 we obtain:
u =v i
negative i.e.
v i= 2 gh
1cos
E2 f =mgR
[1.14]
angle
velocity
for which the particle will
maintain contact
and oscillate
about the lower part of the track.
Condition N>0 at theta = 90
v critical , lower= 2 gR
If
F=ma
[1.18]
v i < 2 gR
v2
)
R
v2
R
If
F=Nmg cos
Dominic Wynes-Devlin
[1.17]
23 cos
N ( )=mg
1cos
2
v =2 gR
F=m
1
m v i2 =mgR
2
(since a=
must be
[1.13]
cos
cos < 0
90 < <180
[1.12]
1cos
[1.16]
v2
m =mg cos
R
v critical , top =5 gR
v i > 5 gR
[1.19]
[1.15]
200759087
v i < 5 gR
2 gR
For:
fall off
Since we are concerned with the particle
completing the loop.
v i > 5 gR
However this still does not confirm that the
particle does not fall off before it reaches the
point.
[1.20]
Evaluating when
v i= 5 gR
:
Model 2 - Marble modelled as sphere with rolling
motion
1+ cos
N=3 mg
ASSUMPTIONS:
-Treat the marble as a uniform sphere with
uniform density.
-There is no air
resistance/drag acting on the car.
-The loop is perfectly circular.
-There is no change in curvature i.e. kink from
when the car reaches the bottom of the slope to
it entering the loop.
-There is no motion
relative between the surface of the ground and
the rollercoaster loop/ track.
For N > 0
We get:
1+cos
3 mg
cos >1
[1.21]
5 R=2 h
h=2.5 R
2 gh
5 gR
Dominic Wynes-Devlin
200759087
2
I = mr 2 (2)
5
[1.25]
2 2
mr
5
[1.26]
(2)
We get
Ef =
vi
7
mu 2
10
[1.24]
(for non-slipping)
Since
Setting
vi
Angular velocity
[1.27]
7
mu2 =mgh
10
2
u=
motion.
R Radius of circle
E2 i=
Mathematical Model
Since the marble is in rolling motion (without
slipping) the frictional force does no work at the
point of contact with ground since it is
instantaneously at rest. Once again the work
done due to the normal force = 0 - since the
normal force is perpendicular to the direction
of motion (the displacement) at all points. i.e.
W =Fs cos
, when
W =Fs cos 90
90
=0
Wfricition = 0
Using this knowledge we can obtain a
conservation of energy equation purely in terms
of mechanical energy (PE, translational KE and
rotational KE).
[1.28]
7
m v i2
10
10
gh
7
E2 i=E f
7
7
mu2 = m v i2
10
10
[1.22]
u2=v i2
1cos
E2 f =mgR
(By conservation of energy)
E2 f =E2 i
Ei=mgh
Dominic Wynes-Devlin
[1.23]
200759087
1cos
mgR
F=m
[1.29]
v2
R
F=Nmg cos
v2
Nmgcos =m
R
N ( )=
17
10
m su
mgcos ( ) mg+
7
7
R
[1.31]
u>
10
gR
7
ucritical=
10
gR
7
10
27
gR< u<
gR
7
7
u>
27
gR
7
[1.32]
Dominic Wynes-Devlin
10
gh
7
u=
27
10
gR= gh
7
7
h=
j
k
27
R
10
Validating
[1.30]
27
gR
7
F=ma
[1.33]
ucritical =
Variables/Values
-
N- Normal force
m- mass of marble
g- acceleration to gravity
F-static frictional force
200759087
Angular velocity
rolling motion.
r Radius of marble
I moment of inertia of the marble
angular acceleration
cri
2
F= mg sin
7
This shows that as theta increases sin theta
increases
hence F will increase until it
reaches its maximum
value at the point
of slipping.
At point of slipping F =
= cri
sliding.
a Linear acceleration.
Laws
2
N= mgsin cri
7
mg sin F=ma
[1.35]
[1.34]
2
mg cos cri= mg sin cri
7
mg cos =N
2
= tan cri
7
7
tan cri =
2
cri=sin 1
=I
[1.36]
=Fr
2
I = mr 2
5
and
a=r
[1.37]
2
= mar
5
Equating equations 1.36 and 1.37
2
Fr= mar
5
[1.38]
2
F= ma
5
Substituting this value of ma into equation 1.34
and re-arranging for F, An equation for F as a
function of is obtained:
[1.39]
Dominic Wynes-Devlin
[1.40]
[1.41]
Conclusion
This investigation has showed that employing
the methods of mathematical modelling and the
laws of mechanics it is possible to understand
the workings of the loop the loop
rollercoaster. However for both models our
expected value for the height differed
significantly from the actual value. The main
reason for this would be due to the initial angle
of inclination for the inclined plane, furthermore
since the critical height only informs of what
height must be exceeded for it to complete a
whole loop it doesnt give us an actual numerical
value only an inequality i.e. it is greater than the
critical value. Taking this into consideration the
model still does correctly predict that the actual
value must be greater than the critical height
however the range between the two results
poses as a problem. If possible the model should
be re-evaluated to include any rolling friction
due to account for deformations on the tracks
200759087
Dominic Wynes-Devlin
200759087