Sunteți pe pagina 1din 3

29442 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No.

98 / Monday, May 23, 2005 / Rules and Regulations

When Does This AD Become Effective? What Sailplanes Are Affected By This AD? issued by the airworthiness authority for
(a) This AD becomes effective on June 30, (c) This AD affects all Model DG–500MB Germany. The actions specified in this AD
are intended to detect and correct damage to
2005. and DG–800B sailplanes that are:
the propeller, which could result in failure of
(1) Certificated in any category; and the propeller to perform properly. This
What Other ADs Are Affected By This
(2) Equipped with a Solo engine. failure could lead to reduced or loss of
Action?
What Is the Unsafe Condition Presented in control of the sailplane.
(b) None.
This AD? What Must I Do To Address This Problem?
(d) This AD is the result of mandatory (e) To address this problem, you must do
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) the following:

Actions Compliance Procedures

(1) Inspect the propeller for any signs of dam- Within 25 hours time-in-service (TIS) after Follow DG Flugzeugbau Technical Note No.
age. June 30, 2005 (the effective date of this 843/19 (LBA approved on April 7, 2004;
AD). EASA approved on April 26, 2004); and DG
Flugzeugbau Technical Note 873/29 (LBA
approved on April 7, 2004; EASA approved
April 26, 2004), as applicable.
(2) If any damage is found during the inspec- Before further flight after the inspection re- Follow DG Flugzeugbau Technical Note No.
tion required in paragraph (e)(1) of this AD, quired in paragraph (e)(1) approved on this 843/19 (LBA approved on April 7, 2004;
replace the propeller. AD. EASA approved on April 26, 2004); and DG
Flugzeugbau Technical Note 873/29 (LBA
approved on April 7, 2004; EASA approved
April 26, 2004), as applicable.
(3) Insert the following language in the Limita- Within 25 hours TIS after June 30, 2005 (the The owner/operator holding at least a private
tions Section of the AFM:. effective date of this AD). pilot certificate as authorized by section
‘‘Caution: With high temperatures (temperature 43.7 of the Federal Aviation Regulations
on ground above 25 °C/77 °F) there is the (14 CFR 43.7) may do the flight manual
risk of overheating the propeller after engine changes requirement of this AD. Make an
retraction. To avoid damage, extend the en- entry in the aircraft records showing compli-
gine again via the manual switch (approx. 1 ance with this portion of the AD following
second) to open the engine doors. Retract section 43.9 of the Federal Aviation Regula-
again after 5 minutes.’’ tions (14 CFR 43.9).

Note: For Model DG–500MB sailplanes, Does This AD Incorporate Any Material by Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on May
FAA recommends you install a polyurethane Reference? 13, 2005.
shock absorber at the retaining cable (h) You must do the actions required by David R. Showers,
mounting in the fuselage. This is specified in this AD following the DG Flugzeugbau Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate,
DG Flugzeugbau Technical Note No. 843/19 Aircraft Certification Service.
Technical Note No. 843/19 (LBA approved
(LBA approved on April 7, 2004; EASA [FR Doc. 05–9975 Filed 5–20–05; 8:45 am]
on April 7, 2004; EASA approved on April
approved on April 26, 2004). The
26, 2004); and DG Flugzeugbau Technical BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
approximate cost to install the shock
absorber is $520 (4 work hours × $65 per Note 873/29 (LBA approved on April 7, 2004;
hour for labor = $260 + $260 for parts). EASA approved April 26, 2004). The Director
of the Federal Register approved the DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Starting with serial number 5E243B20 and
incorporation by reference of these service
on, this shock absorber is being installed at Federal Aviation Administration
bulletins in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a)
production.
and 1 CFR part 51. To get a copy of this
May I Request an Alternative Method of service information, contact DG Flugzeugbau, 14 CFR Part 39
Compliance? Postbox 41 20, 76625 Bruchsal, Germany; [Docket No. FAA–2005–20024; Directorate
(f) You may request a different method of telephone, 49 7257 890; fax, 49 7257 8922. Identifier 2004–NM–66–AD; Amendment 39–
compliance or a different compliance time To review copies of this service information, 14100; AD 2005–10–22]
for this AD by following the procedures in 14 go to the National Archives and Records
CFR 39.19. Unless FAA authorizes otherwise, RIN 2120–AA64
Administration (NARA). For information on
send your request to your principal the availability of this material at NARA, go
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing
inspector. The principal inspector may add to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/
comments and will send your request to the
Model 747–200C and 747–200F Series
code_of_federal_regulations/
Manager, Standards Office, Small Airplane Airplanes
ibr_locations.html or call (202) 741–6030. To
Directorate, FAA. For information on any view the AD docket, go to the Docket AGENCY: Federal Aviation
already approved alternative methods of Management Facility; U.S. Department of Administration (FAA), Department of
compliance, contact Gregory Davison, Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Transportation (DOT).
Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Small Airplane Nassif Building, Room PL–401, Washington,
Directorate, ACE–112, Room 301, 901 Locust, ACTION: Final rule.
DC 20590–001 or on the Internet at http://
Kansas City, Missouri 64106; telephone: 816– SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new
dms.dot.gov. The docket number is FAA–
329–4130; facsimile: 816–329–4090.
2004–19959; Directorate Identifier 2004–CE– airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Is There Other Information That Relates to 46–AD. Boeing Model 747–200C and 747–200F
This Subject? series airplanes. This AD requires
(g) German AD Number D–2004–195 and repetitive inspections for cracking of the
AD Number D–2004–196, both dated April left and right C–3 frame upper closure
23, 2004, also address the subject of this AD. fittings of the nose cargo door, and

VerDate jul<14>2003 14:30 May 20, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\23MYR1.SGM 23MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 98 / Monday, May 23, 2005 / Rules and Regulations 29443

corrective actions if necessary. This AD 98055–4056; telephone (425) 917–6437; Request for Credit for Actions
also provides an optional modification fax (425) 917–6590. Accomplished Previously
that, if done, terminates inspections in Another commenter has no technical
certain areas. This AD is prompted by Examining the Docket
objection to the proposed AD, but
reports indicating that fatigue cracking The AD docket contains the proposed requests that we recognize inspections
was found in the inboard flange above AD, comments, and any final accomplished before the effective date
the flight deck floor on the C–3 frame disposition. You can examine the AD of the AD as acceptable for compliance
upper closure fittings of the nose cargo with the initial inspection requirement.
docket on the Internet at http://
door. We are issuing this AD to detect The commenter states that it has
dms.dot.gov, or in person at the Docket
and correct cracking of the C–3 frame previously accomplished the proposed
Management Facility office between 9
upper closure fittings, which could requirements on some of its airplanes
extend and result in rapid a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The during scheduled maintenance visits.
depressurization of the airplane. We agree with the commenter that
Docket Management Facility office
DATES: This AD becomes effective June any applicable inspection accomplished
27, 2005. (telephone (800) 647–5227) is located on
the plaza level of the Nassif Building at before the effective date of this AD
The incorporation by reference of a should be acceptable for compliance
certain publication listed in the AD is the DOT street address stated in the
ADDRESSES section.
with the initial inspection requirement.
approved by the Director of the Federal However, we find that no change is
Register as of June 27, 2005. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA necessary to meet the intent of the
ADDRESSES: For service information proposed to amend 14 CFR Part 39 with commenter’s request. Credit is always
identified in this AD, contact Boeing an AD for all Boeing Model 747–200C given for actions accomplished before
Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, and 747–200F series airplanes. That the effective date of an AD, as allowed
Seattle, Washington 98124–2207. action, published in the Federal by paragraph (e) of this AD: ‘‘You are
Docket: The AD docket contains the Register on January 18, 2005 (70 FR responsible for having the actions
proposed AD, comments, and any final required by this AD performed within
2826), proposed to require repetitive
disposition. You can examine the AD the compliance times specified, unless
inspections for cracking of the left and
docket on the Internet at http:// the actions have already been done.’’
dms.dot.gov, or in person at the Docket right C–3 frame upper closure fittings of
the nose cargo door, and corrective The phrase ‘‘unless the actions have
Management Facility office between 9 already been done,’’ gives the credit that
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through actions if necessary. That action also
provides an optional modification that, the commenter is seeking. We have not
Friday, except Federal holidays. The changed the AD in this regard.
Docket Management Facility office if done, would terminate inspections in
(telephone (800) 647–5227) is located on certain areas. Conclusion
the plaza level of the Nassif Building at Comments We have carefully reviewed the
the U.S. Department of Transportation, available data, including the comments
400 Seventh Street, SW., room PL–401, We provided the public the that have been submitted, and
Washington, DC. This docket number is opportunity to participate in the determined that air safety and the
FAA–2005–20024; the directorate development of this AD. We have public interest require adopting the AD
identifier for this docket is 2004–NM– considered the comments that have as proposed.
66–AD. been submitted on the proposed AD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ivan
Costs of Compliance
Li, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Support for the Proposed AD This AD affects about 78 airplanes
Branch, ANM–120S, FAA, Seattle One commenter concurs with the worldwide. The following table
Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind proposed AD. provides the estimated costs for U.S.
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington operators to comply with this AD.
ESTIMATED COSTS
Number of
Average labor
Action Work hours Parts Cost per airplane U.S.-registered Fleet cost
rate per hour airplanes

Inspection ................. 2 $65 None ......................... $130, per inspection 20 $2,600, per inspec-
cycle. tion cycle.

Authority for This Rulemaking ‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that Regulatory Findings
section, Congress charges the FAA with
Title 49 of the United States Code We have determined that this AD will
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue not have federalism implications under
air commerce by prescribing regulations
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Executive Order 13132. This AD will
Section 106, describes the authority of for practices, methods, and procedures not have a substantial direct effect on
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, the Administrator finds necessary for the States, on the relationship between
Aviation Programs, describes in more safety in air commerce. This regulation the National Government and the States,
detail the scope of the Agency’s is within the scope of that authority or on the distribution of power and
authority. because it addresses an unsafe condition responsibilities among the various
We are issuing this rulemaking under that is likely to exist or develop on levels of government.
the authority described in Subtitle VII, products identified in this rulemaking For the reasons discussed above, I
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, action. certify that this AD:

VerDate jul<14>2003 14:30 May 20, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\23MYR1.SGM 23MYR1
29444 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 98 / Monday, May 23, 2005 / Rules and Regulations

(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory Repetitive Inspections No Threshold Adjustment


action’’ under Executive Order 12866; (f) Do a detailed inspection of the left and (i) While Note 4 of the Accomplishment
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under right C–3 frame upper closure fittings of the Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures nose cargo door, including the flight deck 747–53A2495, dated December 18, 2003,
floor tang, according to the Accomplishment provides for adjusting the flight cycle
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
threshold specified in the service bulletin by
(3) Will not have a significant 747–53A2495, dated December 18, 2003. Do
not counting flight cycles with a cabin
economic impact, positive or negative, the initial inspection at the applicable
compliance time specified in Figure 1 (Group pressure differential of 2.0 pounds per square
on a substantial number of small entities
1 and 2 airplanes) or 2 (Group 3 and 4 inch or less, this AD does not allow this
under the criteria of the Regulatory
airplanes) of the service bulletin, as adjustment.
Flexibility Act.
applicable; except, where the service bulletin
We prepared a regulatory evaluation Alternative Methods of Compliance
specifies a compliance time relative to the
of the estimated costs to comply with (AMOCs)
date of the initial release of the service
this AD. See the ADDRESSES section for bulletin, this AD requires compliance relative (j)(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO, has the
a location to examine the regulatory to the effective date of this AD. Repeat the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
evaluation. inspection thereafter at intervals not to requested in accordance with the procedures
exceed 3,000 flight cycles, except as provided found in 14 CFR 39.19.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 by paragraph (h) of this AD. (2) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
Note 1: For the purposes of this AD, a level of safety may be used for any repair
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
detailed inspection is: ‘‘An intensive required by this AD, if it is approved by an
safety, Incorporation by reference, examination of a specific item, installation,
Safety. Authorized Representative for the Boeing
or assembly to detect damage, failure, or Delegation Option Authorization
Adoption of the Amendment irregularity. Available lighting is normally
Organization who has been authorized by the
supplemented with a direct source of good
lighting at an intensity deemed appropriate. Manager, Seattle ACO, to make those
■ Accordingly, under the authority findings. For a repair method to be approved,
Inspection aids such as mirror, magnifying
delegated to me by the Administrator, lenses, etc., may be necessary. Surface the repair must meet the certification basis of
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as cleaning and elaborate procedures may be the airplane and the approval must
follows: required.’’ specifically refer to this AD.

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS Repair/Replacement Material Incorporated by Reference


DIRECTIVES (g) If any cracking is found during any (k) You must use Boeing Alert Service
inspection required by this AD: Before Bulletin 747–53A2495, dated December 18,
■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 further flight, do applicable repairs or replace 2003, to perform the actions that are required
continues to read as follows: the fitting with a new fitting, according to the by this AD, unless the AD specifies
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert otherwise. The Director of the Federal
Service Bulletin 747–53A2495, dated Register approves the incorporation by
§ 39.13 [Amended] December 18, 2003; except, where the reference of this document in accordance
bulletin specifies to contact Boeing for
with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. To
■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding appropriate action, before further flight,
repair in accordance with a method approved get copies of the service information, go to
the following new airworthiness
by the Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Boeing Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box
directive (AD):
Office (ACO), FAA; or in accordance with 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124–2207. To
2005–10–22 Boeing: Amendment 39–14100. data meeting the certification basis of the view the AD docket, go to the Docket
Docket No. FAA–2005–20024; airplane approved by an Authorized Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Directorate Identifier 2004–NM–66–AD. Representative for the Boeing Delegation Transportation, 400 Seventh Street SW.,
Effective Date Option Authorization Organization who the room PL–401, Nassif Building, Washington,
Manager, Seattle ACO, has authorized to DC. To review copies of the service
(a) This AD becomes effective June 27,
make this finding. For a repair method to be information, go to the National Archives and
2005. approved by the Manager, Seattle ACO, as Records Administration (NARA). For
Affected ADs required by this paragraph, the Manager’s
information on the availability of this
approval letter must specifically reference
(b) None. material at the NARA, call (202) 741–6030,
this AD.
Applicability or go to http://www.archives.gov/
Optional Modification federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/
(c) This AD applies to all Boeing Model
(h) Doing all actions associated with the ibr_locations.html.
747–200C and 747–200F series airplanes,
modification of the upper closure fitting,
certificated in any category. Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 12,
including performing an open-hole high
Unsafe Condition frequency eddy current inspection for 2005.
(d) This AD was prompted by a report cracking of certain fastener holes and all Jeffrey E. Duven,
indicating that fatigue cracking was found in applicable corrective actions; according to Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
the inboard flange above the flight deck floor Figure 4 of the Accomplishment Instructions Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
on the C–3 frame upper closure fittings of the of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747–
[FR Doc. 05–9981 Filed 5–20–05; 8:45 am]
nose cargo door. We are issuing this AD to 53A2495, dated December 18, 2003;
terminates the repetitive inspections of the BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
detect and correct cracking of the C–3 frame
upper closure fittings, which could extend upper part of the upper closure fitting
and result in rapid depressurization of the required by paragraph (f) of this AD.
airplane. However, inspections of the flight deck floor
tang must continue, as required by paragraph
Compliance (f) of this AD.
(e) You are responsible for having the Note 2: There is no terminating action
actions required by this AD performed within available at this time for the inspections of
the compliance times specified, unless the the flight deck floor tang required by
actions have already been done. paragraph (f) of this AD.

VerDate jul<14>2003 14:30 May 20, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\23MYR1.SGM 23MYR1

S-ar putea să vă placă și