0 evaluări0% au considerat acest document util (0 voturi)
132 vizualizări2 pagini
The parties are continuing to engage in good faith settlement discussions. The demand includes injunctive relief, disgorgement with prejudgment interest. As part of the settlement package, the SEC intends to demand admissions of liability from Pensley.
The parties are continuing to engage in good faith settlement discussions. The demand includes injunctive relief, disgorgement with prejudgment interest. As part of the settlement package, the SEC intends to demand admissions of liability from Pensley.
The parties are continuing to engage in good faith settlement discussions. The demand includes injunctive relief, disgorgement with prejudgment interest. As part of the settlement package, the SEC intends to demand admissions of liability from Pensley.
Case 1:10-cv-02031-DLI-RML Document 353 Filed 10/14/15 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 9840
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION 100 F Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20549 Paul W. Kisslinger Assistant Chief Litigation Counsel DIVISION OF ENFORCEMENT
Telephone (202) 551-4427
Facsimile (202) 772-9292
kisslingerp@sec.gov
October 14, 2015
By ECF The Honorable Dora L. Irizarry United States District Court 225 Cadman Plaza East Brooklyn, New York 11201 Re: Securities and Exchange Commission v. Spongetech Delivery Systems, et al., 10-cv-2031-DLI-RML (E.D.N.Y.) Dear Judge Irizarry: Pursuant to your Honors October 1, 2015 Order, I am writing on behalf of plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC or the Commission) to provide a status update in the above-captioned matter. The parties are continuing to engage in good faith settlement discussions, pursuant to the timeline that Magistrate Judge Levy set forth in the August 25, 2015 scheduling order. See August 25, 2015 Order granting motion to adjourn status conference [Docket Entry 349]. SEC Enforcement Division counsel has issued a settlement demand to defendant Jack Halperins counsel, that, if accepted by Halperin, will be presented to the Commission, and then the Court, for approval. The demand includes injunctive relief, disgorgement with prejudgment interest, and a method for determining civil penalties, the latter of which remains as the most contested term. The parties will continue to negotiate in good faith the proposed civil penalties, and work towards finalizing all proposed terms of settlement within the schedule set forth in the August 25, 2015 Order. As for defendant Joel Pensley, the SEC has sent draft terms of settlement to Pensleys counsel, who is in the process of reviewing the terms with his client. As part of the settlement package, the SEC intends to demand admissions of liability from Pensley, and will submit proposed admissions to Pensleys counsel within the schedule set forth in
Case 1:10-cv-02031-DLI-RML Document 353 Filed 10/14/15 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 9841
Hon. Dora L. Irizarry October 14, 2015 -2the August 25, 2015 Order. As for the Courts inquiry into the status of Pensleys compliance with the provision in the Preliminary Injunction [Docket Entry 112] requiring a sworn accounting, Pensleys counsel indicated that he is in the process of reviewing Pensleys financial information relating to his dealings with Spongetech, and will work with the SEC to provide all required information. Should the parties be unable to resolve the final terms of settlement, we will respectfully request a settlement conference with Magistrate Judge Levy. We hope that the above schedule is acceptable to the Court, and are happy to answer any questions or concerns the Court may have.