Sunteți pe pagina 1din 3

25684 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No.

92 / Friday, March 13, 2005 / Proposed Rules

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION will become effective and which not submit information that you
AGENCY provisions are being withdrawn. If part consider to be CBI or otherwise
or all of the direct final rule in the Rules protected through EDOCKET,
40 CFR Part 63 and Regulations section of today’s regulations.gov, or e-mail. The EPA
[OAR–2003–0178; FRL–7911–2] Federal Register is withdrawn, all EDOCKET and the federal
comments pertaining to the withdrawn regulations.gov websites are
RIN 2060–AM72 provisions will be addressed in a ‘‘anonymous access’’ systems, which
subsequent final rule based on the means EPA will not know your identity
National Emission Standards for proposed amendments. We will not or contact information unless you
Hazardous Air Pollutants: institute a second comment period provide it in the body of your comment.
Miscellaneous Coating Manufacturing before taking the subsequent final If you send an e-mail comment directly
AGENCY: Environmental Protection action. Any parties interested in to EPA without going through
Agency (EPA). commenting must do so at this time. EDOCKET or regulations.gov, your e-
DATES: Comments. Written comments mail address will be automatically
ACTION: Proposed rule; amendments.
must be received on or before June 13, captured and included as part of the
SUMMARY: On December 11, 2003, EPA 2005 unless a hearing is requested by comment that is placed in the public
promulgated national emission May 23, 2005. If a hearing is requested, docket and made available on the
standards for hazardous air pollutants written comments must be received on Internet. If you submit an electronic
(NESHAP) for miscellaneous coating or before June 27, 2005. comment, EPA recommends that you
manufacturing. This action proposes Public Hearing. If anyone contacts the include your name and other contact
amending the NESHAP by providing EPA requesting to speak at a public information in the body of your
additional compliance options and hearing, a public hearing will be held on comment and with any disk or CD–ROM
clarifications. Specifically, this action May 27, 2005. you submit. If EPA cannot read your
proposes an option to demonstrate ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, comment due to technical difficulties
compliance with a percent reduction identified by Docket ID No. OAR–2003– and cannot contact you for clarification,
emission limit by measuring total 0178, by one of the following methods: EPA may not be able to consider your
organic compounds (TOC), an option to • Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// comment. Electronic files should avoid
demonstrate compliance with the www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line the use of special characters, any form
weight percent hazardous air pollutant instructions for submitting comments. of encryption, and be free of any defects
(HAP) limit in coatings products based • Agency Web site: http:// or viruses. For additional information
on formulation data, and a change to the www.epa.gov/edocket. EDOCKET, EPA’s about EPA’s public docket visit
process vessel standards to allow the electronic public docket and comment EDOCKET on-line or see the Federal
cover or lid on a process vessel to be system, is EPA’s preferred method for Register of May 31, 2002 (67 FR 38102).
opened for material additions and receiving comments. Follow the on-line Docket: All documents in the docket
sampling. Other proposed amendments instructions for submitting comments. are listed in the EDOCKET index at
are clarifications of the requirements for • E-mail: air-and-r-docket@epa.gov. http://www.epa.gov/edocket. Although
cleaning operations, the compliance • Fax: (202) 566–1741. listed in the index, some information is
date for equipment that is added to an • Mail: EPA Docket Center, not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other
existing source, the conditions under Environmental Protection Agency, information whose disclosure is
which you must determine whether an Mailcode: 6102T, 1200 Pennsylvania restricted by statute. Certain other
emission stream is a halogenated vent Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460. material, such as copyrighted material,
stream, and the terminology used to Please include a duplicate copy, if is not placed on the Internet and will be
describe the emission limits for process possible. publicly available only in hard copy
vessels. This action also proposes a • Hand Delivery: Air and Radiation form. Publicly available docket
revised definition of Group 2 transfer Docket, Environmental Protection materials are available either
operations to clarify that all product Agency, 1301 Constitution Avenue, electronically in EDOCKET or in hard
loading operations are part of the NW., Room B–108, Washington, DC copy at the Air and Radiation Docket,
miscellaneous coating manufacturing 20460. Such deliveries are only EPA/DC, EPA West, Room B102, 1301
affected source and, thus, are not subject accepted during the Docket’s normal Constitution Ave., NW., Washington,
to the organic liquid distribution (OLD) hours of operation, and special DC. The Public Reading Room is open
NESHAP. arrangements should be made for from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
In the Rules and Regulations section deliveries of boxed information. through Friday, excluding legal
of this Federal Register, we are taking We request that a separate copy also holidays. The telephone number for the
direct final action on the proposed be sent to the contact person listed Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,
amendments because we view the below (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION and the telephone number for the Air
amendments as noncontroversial and CONTACT). Docket is (202) 566–1742.
anticipate no adverse comments. We Instructions: Direct your comments to Public Hearing. If a public hearing is
have explained our reasons for the Docket ID No. OAR–2003–0178. EPA’s held, it will be held at 10 a.m. at the
amendments in the preamble to the policy is that all comments received EPA’s Environmental Research Center
direct final rule. If we receive no will be included in the public docket Auditorium, Research Triangle Park,
adverse comments, we will take no without change and may be made North Carolina or at an alternate site
further action on the proposed available online at http://www.epa.gov/ nearby.
amendments. If we receive adverse edocket, including any personal FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
comments, we will withdraw only those information provided, unless the Randy McDonald, Organic Chemicals
provisions on which we received comment includes information claimed Group, Emission Standards Division
adverse comments. We will publish a to be Confidential Business Information (C504–04), Office of Air Planning and
timely withdrawal in the Federal (CBI) or other information whose Standards, U.S. EPA, Research Triangle
Register indicating which provisions disclosure is restricted by statute. Do Park, North Carolina 27711, telephone

VerDate jul<14>2003 19:25 May 12, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\13MYP3.SGM 13MYP3
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 92 / Friday, March 13, 2005 / Proposed Rules 25685

number (919) 541–5402, electronic mail SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Regulated


address mcdonald.randy@epa.gov. Entities. The regulated category and
entities affected by this action include:

Category NAICS* Examples of regulated entities

Industry ..................................................... 3255 Manufacturers of coatings, including inks, paints, or adhesives.


* North American Industrial Classification System

This table is not intended to be your estimate in sufficient detail to If no relevant adverse comments are
exhaustive, but rather provides a guide allow for it to be reproduced. received, no further action will be taken
for readers likely to be interested in the • Provide specific examples to on the proposal and the direct final rule
revisions to the rule affected by this illustrate your concerns, and suggest will become effective as provided in
action. To determine whether your alternatives. that action.
facility, company, business, • Explain your views as clearly as The regulatory text for the proposal is
organization, etc., is regulated by this possible, avoiding the use of profanity identical to that for the direct final rule
action, you should carefully examine all or personal threats. published in the Rules and Regulations
of the applicability criteria in 40 CFR • Make sure to submit your section of today’s Federal Register. For
63.7985, as well as in today’s proposed comments by the comment period further supplementary information, the
amendments to the applicability deadline identified. detailed rationale for the proposal and
sections. If you have questions regarding Public Hearing. Persons interested in the regulatory revisions, see the direct
the applicability of the amendments to presenting oral testimony or inquiring final rule published in the Rules and
a particular entity, consult the person as to whether a hearing is to be held Regulations section of today’s Federal
listed in the preceding FOR FURTHER should contact Mr. Randy McDonald, Register.
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
Organic Chemicals Group, Emission
Standards Division (Mail Code C504– Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
What Should I Consider as I Prepare My 04), U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, For a complete discussion of all
Comments for EPA? North Carolina 27711, telephone administrative requirements applicable
Submitting CBI. Do not submit this number (919) 541–5402, electronic mail to this section, see the direct final rule
information to EPA through EDOCKET, address mcdonald.randy@epa.gov., at in Rules and Regulations section of
regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark least 2 days in advance of the potential today’s Federal Register.
the part or all of the information that date of the public hearing. Persons
interested in attending the public Regulatory Flexibility Act
you claim to be CBI. For CBI
information in a disk or CD ROM that hearing must also call Mr. Randy The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the McDonald to verify the time, date, and generally requires an agency to prepare
disk or CD ROM as CBI and then location of the hearing. The public a regulatory flexibility analysis of any
identify electronically within the disk or hearing will provide interested parties rule subject to notice and comment
CD ROM the specific information that is the opportunity to present data, views, rulemaking requirements under the
claimed as CBI). In addition to one or arguments concerning these proposed Administrative Procedure Act or any
complete version of the comment that emission standards. other statute unless the agency certifies
includes information claimed as CBI, a Worldwide Web (WWW). In addition that the rule will not have a significant
copy of the comment that does not to being available in the docket, an economic impact on a substantial
contain the information claimed as CBI electronic copy of today’s proposal will number of small entities. Small entities
must be submitted for inclusion in the also be available through the WWW. include small businesses, small
public docket. Information so marked Following the Administrator’s signature, organizations, and small governmental
will not be disclosed except in a copy of this action will be posted on jurisdictions.
accordance with procedures set forth in EPA’s Technology Transfer Network For purposes of assessing the impacts
40 CFR part 2. (TTN) policy and guidance page for of today’s proposed amendments on
Tips for Preparing Your Comments. newly proposed or promulgated rules small entities, a small entity is defined
When submitting comments, remember http://www.epa.gov/ttn/oarpg. The TTN as: (1) A small business having up to
to: at EPA’s web site provides information 500 employees; (2) a small
• Identify the rulemaking by docket and technology exchange in various governmental jurisdiction that is a
number and other identifying areas of air pollution control. If more government of a city, county, town,
information (subject heading, Federal information regarding the TTN is school district or special district with a
Register date and page number). needed, call the TTN HELP line at (919) population of less than 50,000; and (3)
• Follow directions—The agency may 541–5384. a small organization that is any not-for-
ask you to respond to specific questions Direct Final Rule. A direct final rule profit enterprise which is independently
or organize comments by referencing a identical to the proposal is published in owned and operated and is not
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part the Rules and Regulations section of dominant in its field.
or section number. today’s Federal Register. If we receive After considering the economic
• Explain why you agree or disagree; any adverse comment pertaining to the impacts of today’s proposed
suggest alternatives and substitute amendments, we will publish a timely amendments on small entities, I certify
language for your requested changes. notice in the Federal Register informing that this action will not have a
• Describe any assumptions and the public that the amendments are significant economic impact on a
provide any technical information and/ being withdrawn due to adverse substantial number of small entities. In
or data that you used. comment. We will address all public determining whether a proposed rule
• If you estimate potential costs or comments concerning the withdrawn has a significant economic impact on a
burdens, explain how you arrived at amendments in a subsequent final rule. substantial number of small entities, the

VerDate jul<14>2003 19:25 May 12, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\13MYP3.SGM 13MYP3
25686 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 92 / Friday, March 13, 2005 / Proposed Rules

impact of concern is any significant entities subject to the rule. The List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 63
adverse economic impact, since the proposed amendments grant greater
primary purpose of the regulatory flexibility to small entities subject to the Environmental protection,
flexibility analysis is to identify and final rule that may result in a more Administrative practice and procedure,
address regulatory alternatives ‘‘which efficient use of resources for them and, Air pollution control, Hazardous
minimize any significant economic therefore, impose no additional substances, Intergovernmental relations,
impact of the proposed rule on small regulatory costs or requirements on Reporting and recordkeeping
entities’ (5 U.S.C. sections 603 and 604). owners or operators of affected sources. requirements.
Thus, any agency may certify that a rule The EPA continues to be interested in Dated: May 6, 2005.
will not have a significant economic
the potential impacts of the proposed Stephen L. Johnson,
impact on a substantial number of small
rule on small entities and welcomes Administrator.
entities if the rule relieves regulatory
comments on issues related to such [FR Doc. 05–9486 Filed 5–12–05; 8:45 am]
burden or otherwise has a positive
economic effect on all of the small impacts. BILLING CODE 6560–50–P

VerDate jul<14>2003 19:25 May 12, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\13MYP3.SGM 13MYP3

S-ar putea să vă placă și