Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Subject
Author(s): Robert K. Merton
Source: The American Sociologist, Vol. 4, No. 2 (May, 1969), p. 99
Published by: American Sociological Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/27701474 .
Accessed: 27/05/2013 17:37
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
American Sociological Association is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The
American Sociologist.
http://www.jstor.org
B.
Euwema,
1964
References
American
Association
Sociological
American
1963
Association
Sociological
Directory. Wash
American
Association.
ington, D.C:
Sociological
Jessie
Bernard,
1964
Academic
Women.
State Press.
Park:
University
Press
Pennsylvania
1942
1959
(1964).
of Glencoe.
and sex in the social
"Age
States."
K.
Davis,
in Bernard
Foreword
Friedan,
Betty
1963
The Feminine
New York:
Dell.
Mystique.
Talcott
Parsons,
1964
Social
Structure
and Personality.
New York:
American
604-616.
"The
behavior."
sociology of demographic
Pp. 309
333 in Robert K. Merton,
Leonard
Broom, Leonard
Cottrell
(eds.),
Sociology
Today. New York: Harper
and Row.
D.
Riesman,
1964
Introduction
Sanford, N.
1962
(ed.)
The American
structure
in Bernard
of the United
:
7 (October)
Review
Sociological
Free
(1964).
New
College.
York:
Wiley.
K. Merton
Columbia
The
following
who
undergraduate
academic
was
piece
written
how
asked
The
prolixity.
author
he might
chose
the
matters
to an
in response
of The
American
avoid
to consider
is one
of profound
are more
we
all.
cance
of
the
issues
we
are
to examine
is almost
here
self
turn
at
readers
once
to
be
might
consideration
to
led
of
assume
the
that,
some
subject,
as
interesting
it
would
an
be
error.
abysmal
For
it can
be
this
subject
be
would
tance
tinued
ignorance
said?
to ig
or to
it as of only minor
impor
regard
to con
tantamount
to resigning
oneself
can
it. Granted
about
that some
subjects
be
at once,
when
we
to examine
begin
this
in
subject
is not to be in
the con
among
Quite
subjects
safely
neglected.
:
to propose
I
wish
it
sound,
may
trary
extravagant
though
now
on the
of man
the thesis
that of all subjects
agenda
anyone
regard
prime
importance?
as
responsible
and
The
question
answers
it
itself:
we are about
to consider
subject
most
attention.
critical,
deserves
our
closest,
and
that commends
its complexity.
It
vestigate.
is also
There
and mine.
it to your attention
we are to in
For
this is no simple matter
to be men
that needs
is not something
only
May
aspects
is something
too,
are
in
to make
if we
the
outset
of the matter.
understanding
of
Some
we
our
save
not
do
the more
for
energies
use
instead
and
siderations
in
them
significant
con
atten
up
lavishing
so it appears
it is obvious?or
significant,
we shall be at a distinct
to me?that
Perhaps
disadvantage.
will
most
readers
seems
this warning
Perhaps
superfluous.
discrimina
needed
make
these
assume
that they usually
and passing
to the more
important
tions, attending
closely
a sub
in as complex
over
But
the
less
important.
lightly
this excel
that
as this one, there is always
the
danger
ject
tion
on
less
the
to
experience,
be
temptation of assuming
just
as
as
significant
the
temptation:
dangerous
is
every
other
part.
But
are
about
this
perhaps
to
warning is enough to keep the reader from falling prey
temptation.
In approaching
then, we must,
the
if we
subject
are to do
we
to
bend
it justice,
examine,
our every
informed
from
recognize
on a
thorough
some
that
acknowledge
than others.
This,
the
cluded
can
to
ready
significant
must
roads
to us
importance
be
nevertheless
about
ones.
It will be necessary
self-apparent
to examine
of this difficult
every
aspect
seldom
therefore,
homeo
Editor.
Sociologist.?The
are
for us,
University
attention
where
to
focus
on
we
the
and
of
not
at
permitting
the
expense
of
it to ourselves
owe
is due,
insignificant
to recognize
this
and
to keep
many
words
they
in hand.
subject
our
examination
But first, .. .
do
not
always
act
in accord
with
what
so, without
the subject
1969
further
ado,
we
turn
to
99