Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Food Control
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/foodcont
a r t i c l e i n f o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received 8 July 2011
Received in revised form
14 February 2012
Accepted 28 February 2012
Minimally processed fruits and vegetables are ready-to-eat and do not require further treatment at
home. These foods are usually stored in a modied atmosphere and should be maintained at refrigerated
conditions until consumption. These fruits and vegetables can become contaminated by foodborne
pathogens such as Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella and Listeria monocytogenes, and it has been
demonstrated that current industrial sanitising washing treatments do not guarantee the total elimination of the pathogen when present. Thus, it is very important to elucidate whether pathogens are able
to grow or survive during storage at different conditions. This study was conducted to determine the
effect of the type of produce (escarole, carrot, pineapple or melon), package gas composition (air or
modied atmosphere) and temperature (5 or 25 C) on the population dynamics of a strain of E. coli
O157:H7. For vegetables, the growth in two lms, which created different O2 and CO2 concentrations, and
air were compared. At 25 C, growth of E. coli O157:H7 was higher in fresh-cut carrots than in endive,
reaching populations between 7.0e8.4 log cfu g1 and 5.2e6.3 log cfu g1 after 3 days of storage,
respectively. In fruits, E. coli O157:H7 grew well in fresh-cut melon regardless of the atmospheric
conditions in the package, reaching populations of 8.5 and 8.9 log cfu g1 after 1 day of storage in
modied atmosphere packaging (MAP) or under air conditions, respectively. No growth was observed in
the fresh-cut pineapple. At 5 C, E. coli O157:H7 did not grow but survived throughout the studied period
in all tested commodities. This work emphasises the importance of strict temperature control from
processing to consumption, including transportation, distribution, storage and handling in supermarkets
and by consumers.
2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Minimally processed fruits and vegetables
Survival
Population dynamics
Foodborne pathogens
Modied atmosphere packaging
Storage conditions
1. Introduction
Minimally processed fruits and vegetables are widely available
and generally considered safe to eat by consumers. However, the
majority of these products require no further treatment and are
eaten raw, posing a potential safety problem. They may be
contaminated with foodborne pathogens such as Escherichia coli
O157:H7, Salmonella and Listeria monocytogenes. Unfortunately, it
has been demonstrated that current industrial sanitising washing
treatments do not guarantee the total elimination of the pathogen
when present (Abadias, Alegre, Usall, Torres, & Vias, 2010;
Abadias, Usall, Oliveira, Alegre, & Vias, 2008; Beuchat, 1996; Parish
et al., 2003). Outbreaks of E. coli O157:H7 infection have been linked
to the consumption of fresh fruits and vegetables such as alfalfa
and radish sprouts, different lettuce varieties, carrots, spinach,
* Corresponding author. Tel.: 34 973 032 850x1502; fax: 34 973 238 301.
E-mail address: isabel.abadias@irta.cat (M. Abadias).
0956-7135/$ e see front matter 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.02.032
38
Ammar, 1993; Francis & OBeirne, 2001; Oliveira et al., 2010), sliced
cucumber (Abdul-Raouf et al., 1993), shredded carrot (Abdul-Raouf
et al., 1993), dry coleslaw mix (Francis & OBeirne, 2001), soybean
sprouts (Francis & OBeirne, 2001), packaged fresh-cut salad (Luo,
He, & McEvoy, 2010), apples (Alegre, Abadias, Anguera, Oliveira, &
Vias, 2010; Dingman, 2000), honeydew melon (Leverentz et al.,
2001, 2003) and peaches (Alegre, Abadias, Anguera, & Vias,
2010) at abuse temperatures.
Modied atmosphere packaging (MAP) has been successfully
and widely used in combination with refrigeration for whole and
minimally processed fruits and vegetables as a packaging strategy
to maintain product safety and to extend the shelf-life of these
foods (Werner & Hotchkiss, 2006). MAP systems generally utilise an
internal package atmosphere of something other than air in
a hermetically sealed package of suitable permeability, O2, CO2 and
N2 being the most commonly employed. O2 levels are commonly
reduced below, and CO2 increased above, atmospheric levels.
Vegetable respiration alone will decrease O2 and increase CO2
levels inside the package, thereby passively modifying the in-pack
atmosphere. This leads to a reduction of the produce respiration
rate, which retards ripening and senescence. Moreover, MAP
technology suppresses the growth of most indigenous aerobic ora.
However, under certain conditions, the growth of some anaerobic
or microaerophilic psychrotrophic microorganisms, such as
L. monocytogenes and Clostridium spp., might be allowed or even
stimulated. Moreover, extending the shelf-life of minimally processed produce increases the time available for pathogens, if
present, to grow.
The aim of this study was to determine the effect of type of
produce, package gas composition and temperature on the growth
of a strain of E. coli O157:H7. One leafy vegetable (escarole), grated
root (carrot) and two fruits with different pH values (pineapple and
melon) were used.
2. Material and methods
2.1. Microorganism and preparation of inoculums
Strain NCTC 12900 of E. coli O157:H7 (E. coli) was used in this
study. This strain is non-pathogenic and devoid of the ability to
produce verotoxins but phenotypically similar to the toxigenic
strain of E. coli O157:H7. The strain was adapted to grow on Tryptone Soy Agar (TSA, Oxoid, CM0131) supplemented with
100 mg mL1 of streptomycin (TSAS) and maintained at 5 1 C on
TSAS. When required, the strain was subcultured for 24 2 h at
37 1 C on TSAS, inoculated in 50 mL of Tryptone Soy Broth (TSB,
Oxoid CM0129) supplemented with 100 mg mL1 streptomycin
(TSBS) and incubated at 150 rpm for 18e20 h at 37 1 C. Afterwards, the culture was centrifuged at 9820 g for 10 min, and the
resultant pellets were resuspended in saline peptone (SP, 8.5 g L1
NaCl and 1 g L1 peptone). Bacterial concentrations were estimated
by comparing the suspension transmittance at 420 nm with
a previously determined standard curve. Suspensions of about 107
and 105 cfu mL1 were prepared to inoculate vegetables and fruits,
respectively. The concentration applied was conrmed by plating
0.1 mL of an appropriately diluted culture on TSAS.
2.2. Fruits and vegetables
E. coli growth was studied in different vegetal matrices: pineapple (Ananas sativus L., Del Monte Gold), melon (Cucumis melo L.
var. Piel de sapo), curly endive or escarole (Cichorium endivia L. var.
crispa) and carrot (Daucus carota L.), which were purchased from
a local supermarket the day before the experiment and stored at
4 1 C.
3. Results
3.1. Growth and survival of E. coli O157:H7 in fresh-cut escarole at
different temperatures and packaging atmospheres
The initial concentration of E. coli on fresh-cut escarole was
between 4.3 and 4.5 log cfu g1 (Fig. 1A). E. coli grew in fresh-cut
escarole at 25 C regardless of the packaging lm. In escarole
packaged in FILM I, E. coli signicantly increased during the rst day
of storage; however, no signicant increase was observed at later
time points. In contrast, when the fresh-cut escarole was packaged
in FILM II, maximum growth was achieved after three days of
storage, reaching 6.3 log cfu g1. There were no signicant differences between the growth rates in FILM I and FILM II. However,
growth under air conditions was signicantly lower except at day 2.
The O2 concentration signicantly decreased (Fig. 2A) and reached
anaerobic conditions after 2 and 3 days of storage for FILM II and
FILM I, respectively. CO2 levels increased during the experiment,
with nal values between 11.2 and 15.7% for both lms (Fig. 2B).
At 5 C, the E. coli population signicantly declined in fresh-cut
escarole during storage (Fig. 1A). Nevertheless, it survived
throughout the storage period under all packaging conditions.
When the samples were stored in air, the population decreased
0.7 log units in 8 days. For fresh-cut escarole stored in FILM I and
FILM II bags, the populations decreased 0.6 and 0.9 log units after 8
days and 0.8 and 1.0 log units after 10 days of storage at 5 C,
respectively. The O2 concentration inside FILM I bags signicantly
decreased from 20.7% to 9.4% after day 8 and, then, remained
unchanged (Fig. 2A) and progressively decreased in FILM II. The O2
concentration in FILM II bags was signicantly lower than in FILM I,
with a nal value of 3.7%. The CO2 concentration gradually
increased at 5 C but never exceeded 10% (Fig. 2B).
9.0
8.0
9.0
Film I-25C
39
Film II-25C
Film I-25C
Film II-25C
8.0
Air-25C
Air-25C
Film I-5C
7.0
Film II-5C
Film I-5C
Air-5C
6.0
5.0
4.0
Film II-5C
7.0
Air-5C
6.0
5.0
4.0
3.0
3.0
2.0
2.0
0
4
6
Storage time, days
10
12
10
25C
Air
Film I
Film II
0
4.3 a x
4.5 a x
4.5 a x
1
5.2 b y
5.7 a y
5.7 a y
2
5.3 b y
6.0 a y
5.5 ab y
3
5.2 b y
6.0 a y
6.3 a z
5C
Air
Film I
Film II
0
4.3 a x
4.4 a z
4.5 a z
2
4.0 b y
4.3 a y
4.3 a z
6
3.7 ab x
4.0 a x
3.6 b y
8
3.6 b x
3.9 a x
3.6 b y
10
nd
3.7 a w
3.5 a y
25C
Air
Film I
Film II
0
4.5 a x
4.4 a x
4.5 a x
1
8.4 a y
7.0 c y
7.7 b z
2
8.5 a z
7.9 b z
8.0 b z
3
8.4 a zy
8.0 a z
7.0 a y
5C
Air
Film I
Film II
0
4.5 a z
4.4 a z
4.5 a z
2
4.5 a z
4.3 a z
4.3 a z
6
4.1 a y
4.1 a z
4.0 a y
8
4.0 a y
3.2 a y
3.8 a y
Fig. 1. Populations of Escherichia coli O157:H7 (log cfu g1) inoculated by dipping in a suspension containing 105 cfu mL1 in fresh-cut endive (A) and grated carrot (B), which were
packaged in different lms and stored at 25 C or 5 C. The data represent the mean of six determinations. Bars represent standard deviation of the mean. When vertical bars are not
visible, they are smaller than the symbol size. For each storage temperature, different letters (a, b, c) within columns indicate signicant differences (P < 0.05) of E. coli O157:H7
populations among the tested lms, and different letters within rows (w, x, y, z) indicate signicant differences among the storage times.
40
O2 concentration, %
18
21
O2-Film I-25C
O2-Film II-25C
CO2 concentration, %
21
O2-Film I-5C
O2- Film II-5C
15
12
9
6
3
18
CO2-Film I-25C
CO2-Film II-25C
CO2-Film I- 5C
CO2-Film II-5C
15
12
9
6
3
0
0
10
12
4
6
8
Storage time, days
0
20.7 a z
20.7 a z
1
8.0 a y
4.6 b y
2
3.3 a x
0.5 b x
3
0.3 a w
0.1 a x
5C
Film I
Film II
0
20.7 a z
20.7 a z
2
16.2 a y
14.8 b y
6
13.5 a yx
7.9 b x
8
9.4 a x
5.7 a w
10
10.7 a x
3.7 b v
10
12
25C
Film I
Film II
0
0.2 a z
0.2 a x
1
9.5 b y
12.0 a zy
2
13.5 a x
12.5 a z
3
15.7 a w
11.2 b y
5C
Film I
Film II
0
0.2 a x
0.2 a w
2
3.5 b y
4.9 a x
6
4.9 b zy
7.8 a y
8
6.7 a z
7.9 a zy
10
5.9 b z
8.3 a z
Fig. 2. O2 (A) and CO2 (B) concentrations (%) inside fresh-cut endive packaged in FILM I or FILM II and stored at 25 C or 5 C. Bars represent standard deviation of the mean. When
vertical bars are not visible, they are smaller than the symbol size. For each storage temperature, different letters (a, b, c) within columns indicate signicant differences (P < 0.05) of
gas concentrations among the tested lms, and different letters within rows (w, x, y, z) indicate signicant differences among the storage times.
18
O2 Concentration,%
15
12
9
O2-Film I-25C
O2-Film II-25C
O2-Film I-5C
O2-Film II-5C
CO2-Film I-25C
CO2-Film II-25C
CO2-Film I-5C
30
CO2-Film II-5C
20
10
0
0
10
Film I
Film II
5C
Film I
Film II
0
20.6 a z
20.6 a z
1
3.5 a y
1.0 b y
2
2.6 a y
1.5 a y
3
5.3 a y
1.2 b y
25C
0
20.6 a z
20.6 a z
2
12.0 a y
8.6 b y
6
9.6 a y
1.8 b x
8
12.2 a y
0.2 b w
5C
Film I
Film II
Film I
Film II
4
6
Storage time, days
10
0
0.1 a y
0.1 a x
1
20.7 b z
28.6 a y
2
3
26.0 b z 19.5 b z
34.6 a z 28.7 a y
0
0.1 a y
0.1 a w
2
5.6 b z
7.8 a x
6
8.0 b z
15.9 a y
8
5.2 b z
18.0 a z
Fig. 3. O2 (A) and CO2 (B) concentrations (%) inside fresh-cut endive packaged in FILM I or FILM II and stored at 25 C or 5 C. Bars represent standard deviation of the mean. When
vertical bars are not visible, they are smaller than the symbol size. For each storage temperature, different letters (a, b, c) within columns indicate signicant differences (P < 0.05) of
gas concentrations among the tested lms, and different letters within rows (w, x, y, z) indicate signicant differences among the storage times.
10.0
10.0
9.0
Air-25 C
9.0
Air 5 C
41
Air_25C
Air-5C
8.0
MAP-25C
8.0
MAP-25C
7.0
MAP-5C
7.0
MAP-5C
6.0
6.0
5.0
5.0
4.0
4.0
3.0
3.0
2.0
2.0
1.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
0
Air
MAP
5C
Air
MAP
12
15
0
5.1 a z
5.3 a z
1
4.9 a z
5.0 a z
2
4.3 a y
4.2 a y
3
4.0 a y
2.5 b x
0
4.9 a z
5.3 a z
2
4.8 a z
4.8 a zy
6
4.7 a z
4.2 a y
8
nd
3.0 x
25C
Air
MAP
5C
Air
MAP
0
4.8 y
5.0 x
1
8.9 z
8.5 y
2
9.0 z
8.8 zy
3
9.3 z
8.7 z
0
4.8 z
5.0 z
2
5.0 z
5.2 z
6
4.9 z
5.0 z
8
4.4 z
4.8 z
10
nd
4.8 z
14
nd
3.5 y
Fig. 4. Population of Escherichia coli O157:H7 (log cfu g1) spot inoculated with 15 mL of a suspension containing 107 cfu mL1 in fresh-cut pineapple (A) and melon (B), packaged in
MAP (diamonds) or air (triangles) and stored at 25 C (open symbols) or 5 C (full symbols). Data represent the mean of six determinations (three replications and two experiment
repetitions). Bars represent standard deviation of the mean. When vertical bars are not visible, they are smaller than the symbol size. For each storage temperature, different letters
(a, b, c) within columns indicate signicant differences (P < 0.05) of E. coli O157:H7 populations among the tested lms, and different letters within rows (w, x, y, z) indicate
signicant differences among the storage times.
42
50.0
B
50.0
60.0
40.0
30.0
20.0
10.0
0.0
40.0
30.0
20.0
10.0
0.0
12
15
12
15
Fig. 5. O2 and CO2 concentrations (%) inside fresh-cut pineapple (A) and fresh-cut melon (B), which were packaged in MAP and stored at 25 C or 5 C. The data represent the mean
of six determinations. Bars represent standard deviation of the mean. When vertical bars are not visible, they are smaller than the symbol size. For each storage temperature,
different letters (a, b, c) within columns indicate signicant differences (P < 0.05) of gas concentrations among tested lms, and different letters within rows (w, x, y, z) indicate
signicant differences among the storage times.
& Frank, 1999). Escarole has less cut surface area compared to the
carrot, and E. coli O157:H7 cells most likely could not properly
attach to the surface of the escarole. Moreover, some aqueous
extracts from roots and the aerial parts of Cichorium intybus L.,
which belongs to the same family as escarole (Asteraceae), have
been reported to have antibacterial activities (Petrovic, Stanojkovic,
Comic, & Curcic, 2004). The survival of E. coli O157:H7 in other leafy
vegetables (mainly lettuce) has been reviewed by Delaquis, Bach,
and Dinu (2007). Populations of viable E. coli O157:H7 cells significantly decrease on Iceberg lettuce stored at 5 C and signicantly
increased during storage at 12 or 21 C (Abdul-Raouf et al., 1993).
Recently, Oliveira et al. (2010) also observed the growth of this
same strain on fresh-cut Romaine lettuce stored at 25 C, but no
growth was observed at 5 C. The presence of competing microorganisms on the surfaces of fresh produce has also been reported
to contribute to pathogen reduction. The typical microbiota present
on fresh vegetables is composed of many species and might
compete with pathogens for physical space and nutrients and/or
produce antagonistic compounds that negatively affect the viability
of pathogens (Parish et al., 2003). Babic, Watada, and Buta (1997)
reported that background microbiota on spinach inhibits the
growth of L. monocytogenes. However, different levels of background microbiota did not affect the growth of E. coli O157:H7 and
L. monocytogenes on Romaine lettuce (Oliveira, Vias, Anguera, &
Abadias, 2012).
Pineapple was largely unsuitable for E. coli growth even at 25 C.
At rst and due to other authors results, we presumed that the lack
of growth could be due to the low pH of pineapple (3.28e4.06), as
the concentrations of O2 and CO2 were initially similar to those
achieved in fresh-cut melon, which did not inhibit growth.
However, Alegre, Abadias, Anguera, Oliveira et al. (2010) found that
this same strain was able to grow at 25 C on Granny Smith freshcut apples (pH between 3.29 and 3.35 and a titratable acidity of
7.9e8.4 g malic acid L1 of juice), which would be more restrictive.
E. coli O157:H7 is known to have a high tolerance to acidity
(Benjamin & Datta, 1995; Conner & Kotrola, 1995). Other authors
(Deng, Ryu & Beuchat, 1999) noted that both the pH and the acid
present are also of importance. In TSB-acidied medium, the order
of sensitivity for E. coli O157:H7 at a given pH is acetic acid > citric
acid > malic acid, and the major acids in pineapple and apple are
citric and malic, respectively. Similarly, Conner and Kotrola (1995)
found that three isolates of E. coli O157:H7 did not grow at 25 C
in TSBYE acidied to pH 4.5 using citric acid, but they grew at pH 4.5
when malic acid was used. Strawn and Danyluk (2010) found that
E. coli O157:H7 did not grow and survived poorly on fresh-cut
pineapples (pH ca. 3.6) held at 23, 12 and 4 C. These researchers
product but not with the lm used. Dissolved CO2 has been found to
inhibit microbial growth (Devlieghere & Debevere, 2000; Hotchkiss
& Banco, 1992), affecting the lag phase, maximum growth rate and/
or maximum population densities reached, and levels in excess of
5% in MAP systems have been found to be bacteriostatic (Hotchkiss
& Banco, 1992). Moderate levels of CO2 of 20e60% have been found
to inhibit the growth of Pseudomonas spp. and Moraxella spp.
(Cutter, 2002). However, in our study, even high CO2 concentrations were achieved at 25 C, and there was no growth inhibition.
Similarly, Hao and Brackett (1993) concluded that the growth of
E. coli O157:H7 was not inhibited by gas mixtures containing up to
10% CO2 at 5 or 10 C. Other workers reported that 30% CO2 had no
inhibitory effect on the growth of E. coli O157:H7 on shredded
lettuce stored at 13 or 22 C (Diaz & Hotchkiss, 1996). Francis and
OBeirne (2001) also found that a gas atmosphere that was
passively generated inside packs of lettuce and swedes was not
inhibitory to E. coli O157:H7 12900. Delaquis et al. (2007) also
suggested that gas composition has no direct effect on E. coli
O157:H7 growth.
5. Conclusions
The studied strain of E. coli O157:H7 survived at 5 C throughout
the studied period in the four studied commodities. Except for
pineapple, at 25 C, growth was very rapid and reached populations
between 5.2 and 8.9 log cfu g1 after 24 h. This work emphasises
the importance of strict temperature control from processing to
consumption: transportation, distribution, storage and handling in
supermarkets and by consumers. An abusive storage temperature
could result in an undesirable and hazardous rise of an E. coli
O157:H7 population. It is essential that the contamination of
produce be minimised through the use of good agricultural and
strict hygiene practices and that HACCP programs specic for the
pathogen of concern be applied at all stages of production. Even
under refrigeration conditions (5 C), E. coli O157:H7 could survive
and be present at consumption, thus serving as a risk for consumers
as no specic disinfection measures are taken for ready-to-eat
products.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to the Spanish Government [Ministerio
de Ciencia y Tecnologa, Research Project AGL-2004-06027 and
INIA researcher contract CTE/3597/2003 (BOE 23/12/2003)] and the
FEDER for their nancial support.
References
Abadias, M., Alegre, I., Usall, J., Torres, R., & Vias, I. (2010). Evaluation of different
alternative substances to chlorine for reducing foodborne pathogens in freshcut apple processing. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 59, 289e297.
Abadias, M., Usall, J., Oliveira, M., Alegre, I., & Vias, I. (2008). Efcacy of neutral
electrolysed water (NEW) for reducing microbial contamination on minimallyprocessed vegetables. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 123, 151e158.
Abdul-Raouf, U. M., Beuchat, L. R., & Ammar, M. S. (1993). Survival and growth of
E. coli O157:H7 on salad vegetables. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 59,
1999e2006.
Alegre, I., Abadias, M., Anguera, M., Oliveira, M., & Vias, I. (2010). Factors affecting
growth of foodborne pathogens on minimally processed apples. Food Microbiology, 27, 70e76.
Alegre, I., Abadias, M., Anguera, M., & Vias, I. (2010). Fate of Escherichia coli,
Salmonella and Listeria innocua on minimally-processed peaches under
different storage conditions. Food Microbiology, 27, 862e868.
Babic, I., Watada, A. E., & Buta, J. G. (1997). Growth of Listeria monocytogenes
restricted by native microorganisms and other properties of fresh-cut spinach.
Journal of Food Protection, 60, 912e917.
Basset, J., & McClure, P. (2008). A risk assessment approach for fresh fruits. Journal of
Applied Microbiology, 104, 925e943.
Benjamin, M. M., & Datta, A. R. (1995). Acid tolerance of enterohemorrhagic
Escherichia coli. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 61, 1669e1672.
43
44
treatment with lytic bacteriophages and a bacteriocin. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 69, 4519e4526.
Luo, Y., He, Q., & McEvoy, J. L. (2010). Effect of storage temperature an duration on
the behavior of Escherichia coli O157:H7 on packaged fresh-cut salad containing
Romaine and Iceberg lettuce. Journal of Food Science, 75, M390eM397.
Marques, P. A. H. F., Worcman-Barninka, D., Lannes, S. C. S., & Landgraf, M. (2001).
Acid tolerance and survival of Escherichia coli O157:H7 inoculated in fruit pulps
stored under refrigeration. Journal of Food Protection, 64, 1674e1678.
Mutaku, E., Erku, W., & Ashena, M. (2005). Growth and survival of Escherichia coli
O157:H7 in fresh tropical fruit juices at ambient and cold temperatures. International Journal of Food Science and Nutrition, 56, 133e139.
Oliveira, M., Usall, J., Solsona, C., Alegre, I., Vias, I., & Abadias, M. (2010). Effects of
packaging type and storage temperature on the growth of foodborne pathogens
on shredded Romaine lettuce. Food Microbiology, 27, 375e380.
Oliveira, M., Vias, I., Anguera, M., & Abadias, M. (2012). Fate of Listeria monocytogenes and Escherichia coli O157:H7 in the presence of natural background
microbiota on conventional and organic lettuce. Food Control, 25, 678e683.
Palumbo, S. A., Call, J. E., Schultz, F. J., & Williams, A. C. (1995). Minimum and
maximum temperatures for growth and verotoxin production by hemorrhagic
strains of Escherichia coli. Journal of Food Protection, 58, 352e356.
Parish, M. E., Beuchat, L. R., Suslow, T. V., Harris, L. J., Garrett, E. H., Farber, J. N., et al.
(2003). Methods to reduce/eliminate pathogens from fresh and fresh-cut
produce. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 2, 161e173.
Petrovic, J., Stanojkovic, A., Comic, L. J., & Curcic, S. (2004). Antibacterial activity of
Cichorium intybus L. Fitoterapia, 75, 737e739.
Rajkowski, D. T., & Marmer, B. S. (1995). Growth of Escherichia coli O157:H7 at
uctuating incubation temperatures. Journal of Food Protection, 58, 1307e1313.
Seo, K. H., & Frank, J. F. (1999). Attachment of Escherichia coli O157:H7 to lettuce leaf
surface and bacterial viability in response to chlorine treatment as demonstrated by using confocal scanning laser microscopy. Journal of Food Protection,
62, 3e9.
Sivapalasingam, S., Friedman, C. R., Cohen, L., & Tauxe, R. V. (2004). Fresh produce:
a growing cause of outbreaks of foodborne illness in the United States, 1973
through 1997. Journal of Food Protection, 67, 2342e2353.
Sodha, S. V., Lynch, M., Wannemuehler, K., Leeper, M., Malavet, M., Schaffzin, J., et al.
(2010). Multistate outbreak of Escherichia coli O157:H7 infections associated
with a national fast-food chain, 2006: a study incorporating epidemiological
and food source traceback results. Epidemiology and Infection, 30, 1e8.
Strawn, L. K., & Danyluk, M. D. (2010). Fate of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella on fresh and frozen cut pineapples. Journal of Food Protection, 73, 418e424.
Ukuku, D. O., & Sapers, G. M. (2007). Effect of time before storage and storage
temperature on survival of Salmonella inoculated on fresh-cut melons. Food
Microbiology, 24, 288e295.
Werner, B. G., & Hotchkiss, J. H. (2006). Modied atmosphere packaging. In
G. M. Sapers, J. R. Gorny, & A. E. Yousef (Eds.), Microbiology of fruits and vegetables (pp. 437e460). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.