Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
George Pickingill (c. 1816 10 April 1909) was an English farm labourer who lived and worked in the village of
Canewdon in the eastern English county of Essex. Widely
considered to be a cunning man, or vocational folk magician, he reportedly employed magical means to oer
cures for ailments and to locate lost property, although
was also alleged to have threatened to curse peoples property.
1 Biography
1.1 Life and family
George Pickingill was the son of Charles Pickingill, a
labourer and blacksmith, and Susannah Cudner, a woman
who also went by the name of Hannah Cudmore; the couple had married on 17 September 1813.[3] Although he
had no known birth record, according to parish records,
George Pickingill was baptised on 26 May 1816 at the
church in Hockley.[3] The year of Pickingills birth is
however in question, as he made diering claims in different censuses; in the 1851 census, he claimed to be 26,
meaning that his birth would have occurred circa 1825,
while in the 1861 census, he claimed to be 46, which
would have placed his birth c.1815. By the time of the
1901 census, he was claiming to be 95, moving his birth
to c.1806; it has been suggested that he made himself appear older to ease the process of collecting parish assistance from the church.[4] Throughout his life, Pickingill
would also use a variety of dierent spellings of his surname on ocial records, including Pickengill, Pickingale,
Pickengal, Pettingale, Pitengale, and Pittengale.[3]
2
record.[4]
On 22 June 1858 the couples daughter, Martha Ann, was
born in Hawkwell, Essex. By 1861 they had moved to
Eastwood, Essex, where they were recorded in that years
census.[4] Here, Pickingill described himself as an agricultural labourer.[4] That same year, their son Charles
Frederick was born.[4] The following year, Pickingills
wife was caught stealing two pecks of potatoes, and subsequently ned ten shillings.[4] In 1863, a second daughter, named Mary Ann, was born to the couple.[4]
1 BIOGRAPHY
and allowed the old man to ride in it.[4] The journalist subsequently wrote an article about the alleged centegenerian, in which he claimed that his name was Frederick Pickingale"; it is possible that Pickingill gave the
false name so that no one would be able to look up the
parish records and discover his real age.[4] Maple described Pickingill as a tall, unkempt man, solitary and
uncommunicative. He had very long nger-nails, and
kept his money in a purse of sacking. He also noted
that he had worked as a farm labourer and that he was a
widower with two sons.[5]
Magical activities
1.2
Magical activities
3
our pony and trap to Rochford Fair; but that day the
beast just wouldn't move, no matter what we did with it.
Then we suddenly saw George Pickingill staring at us with
those terrible eyes of his. He came over and told us to put
down the reins and not to interfere with the pony at all.
Then he whispered in its ear for a few minutes and stood
back and hit it; and it started o, and found its way down
the lanes to Rochford, without our needing to touch it.
Jack Taylor, interviewed by Ronald Hutton, 1967.[19]
Subsequent researchers also travelled to Canewdon to
meet with Maples informants and conrm his account
for themselves. In April 1967 Ronald Hutton visited the
village where he met with elderly resident Lillian Garner, who had been one of Maples informants. He also
found an informant that Maple had not encountered, an
old man named Jack Taylor, then living in a retirement
home. Taylor claimed that as a young man he knew
Pickingill, and that the latter had the power of horsewhisperingthe magical ability to command horses to
do his bidding. On the whole, Hutton found that the
account of Pickingill among the local people to whom
he spoke was entirely consistent with that provided by
Maple.[19][lower-alpha 2] In 1977 Hutton was followed by the
Gardnerian Wiccan initiate Michael Howard, who met
with Garner, then eighty-seven years old.[21] On this occasion, she recalled Pickingill being photographed with
the rst car to arrive in the village, and also gave Howard
the original copy of a photograph of him that was in her
possession.[22] She then added the informationwhich
she had not given to Maple or Huttonthat her own
mother had talked of Pickingill leading a local coven, and
that he received many visitors from a long way away
who sought his magical knowledge.[1]
A dierent account was provided by Charles Lefebvre, an American author of the sensationalist Witness to
Witchcraft (1970). Here, his use of sources was unclear,
although he asserted that Pickingill had had an ageless
body, was a relative of Roma people, was the last survivor of an old witch family, held Black Masses and orgies in the church yard, and was visited by black magicians from across Europe. According to Lefebvre,
Pickingill was nally killed when confronted by the sign
of the cross.[23] Hutton later described these as fantasies
which served to support Lefebvres view that witchcraft
should be criminalised.[19]
However, claims have since been made that Pickingill
was not a cunning man or involved in folk magic at all.
Local Canewdon historian Sylvia Webster expressed her
view to Howard that tales regarding Pickingills magical
practices had been invented by the locals of Canewdon to
impress Maple. Supporting this position, she highlighted
that there was no evidence to suggest that Pickingill was
a cunning man prior to Maples publications.[24] Similarly, Richard Ward argued that the contemporary obituaries and interviews conducted with Pickingill had shown
1.3
Death
In 1974, a writer began sending articles to Pagan newsletter The Wiccan, then edited by the Gardnerian Wiccan John Score, articulating an alternative account of
Pickingills life and relation to the British occult movement. First identifying himself only as a well wisher,
he later began using the pseudonym Lugh, named for the
Irish mythological gure.[28] In 1977, Lugh ceased sending the articles to The Wiccan and instead began publishing them in a rival British magazine, The Cauldron, edited
by Michael Howard; he claimed to have switched outlets
because The Wiccan had been too dominated by Gardnerian perspectives.[29] Lugh later revealed his name to be
E.W. Bill Liddell, describing himself as an Englishman
born in Essex. He added that circa 1960 he had moved to
Auckland, New Zealand, before later relocating to Australia, from where he wrote his articles.[30] In a 1984 letter
he noted that he was not born with the surname of Liddell but had instead adopted it later in life.[31] Claiming
that Pickingill had been the rst-cousin of his paternal
great-great grandfather, Liddell asserted that he had been
initiated into his familys hereditary form of witchcraft
in 1950,[32] and that he had subsequently been initiated
into both the Gardnerian and Alexandrian traditions of
Wicca.[33] His partner, Sylvia Tatham, had been heavily
involved in the development of the Alexandrian tradition
in the early 1960s, having been one of those present when
its founder, Alex Sanders, was initiated into the Gardnerian tradition.[34] In 1982, Wiccan Publications collected
2.1
Liddells account
together and published these articles as two pamphlets: 2.1 Liddells account
Old George Pickingill and the Roots of Modern Witchcraft
and Medieval Witchcraft and the Freemasons.[35] The articles were republished in one single volume in 1994 as According to Liddells initial 1974 claims, since the
The Pickingill Papers, edited by Liddell and Howard.[36] eleventh century the Pickingill family had been priests
of a pre-Christian, pagan religion devoted to the worship
The Lugh corpus was expressly written to be confrontaof the Horned God.[43] In this, his claims tted within
tional. Several surviving Craft families, a number of
the historical framework of the discredited witch-cult hysolitaries, and my own Brethren were at rst amused
pothesis as propagated in the works of Margaret Murand then alarmed at the Witchcraft beliefs being proray.[44] Later he added that the medieval witch cult
pounded by Gerald Gardner and Alex Sanders. The
was inuenced by the tenets of the Iron Age druids,
tenets of Wicca bore little resemblance to the rites and
in particular their knowledge of ley lines which were
practices of Traditional Witchcraft in England. My
marked out by the stone circles erected in the Neolithic
Brethren decided to take the bull by the horns and nd
and Bronze Ages.[45] Conicting with these ideas, in 1998
a public platform to explain that there were a number of
Liddell personally informed Hutton that the witch-cult
disparate witch traditions.
did not derive from ancient pre-Christian religion but that
Bill Liddell, 1999.[37]
it instead had been founded in fteenth-century France,
emerging from a union between Christian heretics, cunLiddells claims regarding Pickingill are self- ning lodges, and a cult of Lucifer founded by Islamic
[44]
contradictory.[36] Liddell explained this by stating Moors with the intent of undermining Christianity.
that the information contained in his articles had been
passed on to him by three separate sources, all of which
had decided to use him as a mouthpiece for their own
claims. The rst were the members of a hereditary
tradition of Pagan witchcraft, while the second were
the practitioners of a similar yet separate tradition of
Pagan witchcraft which, Liddell alleged, had been greatly
inuenced by Pickingill in the nineteenth century. The
third source cited by Liddell was his own experiences
gained from being born into a witchcraft family and subsequently being initiated into both of the aforementioned
traditions and a separate cunning lodge.[38] He claimed
that most of the information that he was publishing came
from Elders, or older members, involved in the rst
two of these traditions, and that as such he could not
vouch for its accuracy,[36] going so far as to state that he
doubted the veracity of much of it.[39]
Noting that these Elders themselves had very dierent
opinions on Gardnerian Wicca,[40] he also stated that the
Elders ceased providing him with new information in
the early 1980s.[36] He stated that these various Elders
had chosen him to disseminate the information because
he had been involved in both hereditary witchcraft and
Gardnerian Wicca and because he was based in New
Zealand, thereby making it hard for anyone to trace their
identities.[41] Despite Liddell claiming that the material
he was putting forward came from various sources, the
historian Ronald Hutton noted that it was all presented
in a single, dogmatic, authorial voice, with no indication of where the dierent pieces of information came
from.[42] Hutton also asserted that Liddells changing
claims would be entirely consistent with a single individual making up stories and changing them as they went
along.[42]
6
that Pickingill then established nine covens in England,
spread out in Essex, Norfolk, Hertfordshire, Sussex, and
Hampshire;[53] he further added that two of those covens,
based in Hertfordshire and Norfolk, survived into at least
the 1970s.[54] According to Liddell, Pickingill was propagating witchcraft in a reformed, female-oriented form
because the oncoming Age of Aquarius would be more
receptive to this form of spirituality.[55]
In Liddells account, Pickingill travelled widely and
joined a variety of cunning lodges, gaining access to their
grimoires and libraries.[56] According to Liddell, from
the 1850s onward Pickingill began co-operating with a
group of Freemasons who considered themselves to be
Rosicrucians and who wanted to prove that Freemasonry
and Rosicrucianism were siblings of the witch-cult.[57]
Two of these Freemasons, Hargrave Jennings and W.J.
Hughan, became pupils of Pickingill, who aided them in
producing a Rosicrucian Manifesto that was used in the
formation of the Societas Rosicruciana in 1865.[58] According to Liddell, Pickingills involvement with Freemasons also led to the foundation of the Hermetic Order
of the Golden Dawn in 1888.[59] Liddell also asserted
that Pickingill was inuenced by a coven that had been
founded in the early nineteenth-century by a group of
Cambridge University academics led by Francis Barrett and whose rituals were based largely on Classical
sources.[60]
The rites [George Pickingill] drafted emphasised ritual
nudity, nature worship, the unity of the Goddess, female dominance, the ve-fold kisswithout the words
'Blessed Be'the Drawing Down of the Moon, the Goddess Charge, the Legend of the Goddess, induction by
the opposite sex, a tri-gradal initiation structure, the use
of magical cords etc. It is dicult not to recognise the
basic features of what is now Gardnerian Wicca.
Bill Liddell, 1984.[61]
Liddell also claimed that the prominent occultist Aleister
Crowley had been initiated into one of these nine covens
as a young man. According to this account, Crowley
had been introduced to the coven in 1899 or 1900 by his
magical mentor, Allan Bennett.[62] Liddell asserted that
Crowley was subsequently ejected from the coven for his
misbehaviour.[63] As evidence for these claims, he stated
that his own grandfather had been present on three occasions at which Bennett and Crowley met with Pickingill,
and that he had seen a photograph in which the three gures are together.[62] When asked to present this photograph for public scrutiny in 1977, Liddell claimed that it
was not available"; when independently asked again in
1983, he asserted that it had been stolen by interested
parties.[64]
2.3
Academic response
2.3
Academic response
claims, although Baker disagreed, commenting that Valiente was one of the most honest of commentators on
the subject of contemporary witchcraft, and that as a
result was unlikely to be involved in such duplicity.[79]
Baker described Liddells account as an extravagant
hoax, with its claims constituting a preposterous ahistorical muddle.[80]
Historian Ronald Hutton also scrutinised Liddells claims,
although added that he had corresponded with Liddell at
length and in detail,[36] over the course of which he had
come to like him, noting that he has responded to often forceful criticisms with patience, modesty, and good
humour.[81] However, Hutton highlighted that no independent witnesses have emerged to support the existence
of Liddells alleged informants, while no supporting documentation has appeared to back any of his many claims.
Hutton deemed this particularly unusual, because were
Liddells claims to have been accurate, much documentary evidence could be expected to exist.[82] Focusing on
Liddells claim that Crowley had been initiated into one
of Pickingills covens during the 1890s, Hutton noted that
there is no mention of Pickingill or a witches coven in
either Crowleys published work or personal diaries, and
that similarly there was no mention of either in the diaries
of Bennett, who was Crowleys magical tutor during the
1890s.[83]
REFERENCES
Davies; in his study of English cunning-folk, he dein which he undertook these inquiries at Canewdon.[20]
scribed Liddells stories as seductive but entirely unsubstantiated. Instead, he maintained that Pickingill was
a simple rural cunning-man whose small world of vil- 3.2 Footnotes
lage aairs never crossed with that of middle-class occultists. He received a Christian burial and the idea [1] Howard 2011, p. 114.
that he was a pagan priest would probably make him [2] Phillips 2004.
turn in his grave.[84] While agreeing with Maples assessment that Pickingill was one of the last practising [3] Liddell & Howard 1994, p. 15; Wallworth 2012.
cunning-folk in the country, Maple noted thatunlike
[4] Wallworth 2012.
Murrell, James Tuckett, John Wrightson, and William
BrewerPickingill was not a major regional gure in [5] Maple 1960, p. 247.
the profession.[85]
American Pagan studies scholar Aidan A. Kelly similarly rejected Liddells claims. Kelly highlighted that
whereas Liddell had claimed that Gardnerian Wicca had
adopted the concept of a female coven leader from French
and Scandinavian witch covens, the historical evidence
clearly showed that Gardner developed the concept of a
coven being led by a high priestess during the late 1950s,
thus disproving Liddells assertions.[86] He noted that Liddells claim that Crowley wrote Gardners Book of Shadows cannot possibly be true because Crowley died before the Book was written.[87] Kelly believed that either
Liddell or his Elders had purposely created a phony history in order to hide the fact that Gardner had invented
Wicca in its entirety in the early 1950s.[88] Similarly, in
a 2014 article about Pickingill in The Cauldron, Richard
Ward argued that Liddells claims did not stand up under scrutiny, and that they had simply been made in an
attempt to promote claims regarding the existence of a
pre-Gardnerian tradition of witchcraft.[31] Liddell has
specically denied any charges that he was deliberately
falsifying claims to make Gardnerian Wicca appear to
have an older pedigree than it really has.[89]
3
3.1
References
Notes
[1] The original copy of this photograph was owned by Lillian Garner, who claimed that it was of George Pickingill
and who allowed for it to be rst published by Eric Maple;
in 1977 she gave her original copy of the photograph to
Michael Howard.[1] In a July 1984 issue of Insight magazine, a letter was published by John Pope stating that The
photograph purporting to be Old George Pickingill is in
fact a photo of Alf Cavill, a station porter at Elstree, taken
in the early 1960s. Alf is now dead, but he was no witch,
and laughed over the photograph when he saw it.[2] Wiccan historian Julia Phillips cautioned however that a very
respected Craft authority has told me that he believes the
photo, which is in his possession, to be of Pickingill, and
I have no reason to disbelieve him.[2]
[2] After being queried on the year in question, Ronald Hutton conrmed to Michael Howard that the 1967 date was
correct, and that he had been thirteen years old at the time
3.3
Bibliography
3.3 Bibliography
Baker, James W. (1996). White
Witches: Historic Fact and Romantic Fantasy. In James R.
Lewis. Magical Religion and Modern Witchcraft.
Albany, New
York: State University of New
York Press. pp. 171192. ISBN
978-0-7914-2890-0.
Bisseker, Scott; Liddell, Bill
(2006). Old George Pickingill
and the History of Modern
Pickingill.com.
Witchcraft.
Archived from the original on 21
December 2014.
Bourne, Lois (1998). Dancing with
Witches. London: Robert Hale.
ISBN 978-0-7090-6223-3.
Davies, Owen (2003). CunningFolk: Popular Magic in English History. London: Hambledon Continuum. ISBN 978-1-84725-036-0.
10
3
Doyle White, Ethan (2011). Review of Michael Howards Children
of Cain".
The Pomegranate:
the
International
Journal
of Pagan Studies (Sheeld:
Equinox) 13 (2):
274276.
doi:10.1558/pome.v13i2.274.
Howard, Michael (2009). Modern Wicca: A History from Gerald Gardner to the Present. Woodbury: Llewellyn. ISBN 978-07387-2288-7.
Howard, Michael (2011). Children
of Cain: A Study of Modern Traditional Witches. Richmond Vista:
Three Hands Press.
Howard, Michael (2014). Editorial Note. The Cauldron 152. p.
22. ISSN 0964-5594.
Howard, Michael (2014b). Editorial Note. The Cauldron 154. p.
46. ISSN 0964-5594.
Hutton, Ronald (1999). The Triumph of the Moon: A History of
Modern Pagan Witchcraft. New
York: Oxford University Press.
ISBN 978-0-19-285449-0.
Hutton, Ronald (2014). Response
to Pickingill Article. The Cauldron 153. p. 6. ISSN 0964-5594.
Kelly, Aidan A. (1991). Crafting
the Art of Magic Book I: A History
of Modern Witchcraft, 19391964.
St. Paul: Llewellyn. ISBN 978-087542-370-8.
Kelly, Aidan A. (2007). Inventing
Witchcraft: A Case Study in the Creation of a New Religion. Loughborough, Leicestershire: Thoth Publications. ISBN 978-1-870450-584.
Lefebvre, Charles (1970). Witness
to Witchcraft. New York: Ace.
Liddell, W.E.; Howard, Michael
(1994). The Pickingill Papers: The
Origin of the Gardnerian Craft.
Chieveley, Berkshire: Capall Bann.
ISBN 978-1-898307-10-5.
REFERENCES
11
4.1
Text
George Pickingill Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Pickingill?oldid=687233201 Contributors: Graeme Bartlett, D6, Bender235, Rjwilmsi, Pigman, Ohconfucius, Mr Stephen, Midnightblueowl, J Milburn, ShelfSkewed, Cydebot, Mike Christie, Nick Number,
Dawnseeker2000, Robina Fox, Pedro, Waacstats, Belovedfreak, Aciram, Twendai, Jeremytrewindixon, ClueBot, P. S. Burton, Dthomsen8, Dubmill, Tudorrosephotography, Leszek Jaczuk, Legobot, Yobot, AnomieBOT, Ulric1313, Citation bot, LilHelpa, DefaultsortBot,
Tom.Reding, Trappist the monk, RjwilmsiBot, Helpful Pixie Bot, Tzaratron, DavidLeighEllis, Ugog Nizdast, Stamptrader and Anonymous:
10
4.2
Images
File:Aleister_Crowley,_wickedest_man_in_the_world.jpg Source:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/7/7e/Aleister_
Crowley.jpg License: ? Contributors:
Originally published in The Equinox volume 1, issue 10 (1913) (see deletion discussion). This version taken from Book 4, Part 2 by
uploader Commons user Dnaspark99. Originally uploaded at Commons as Commons:File:Aleister Crowley, wickedest man in the world.jpg,
but now deleted. Original artist:
Unknown
File:Canewdon_essex_1.jpg Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3c/Canewdon_essex_1.jpg License: CC BYSA 3.0 Contributors: Own work Original artist: Terryjoyce
File:George_Pickingill,_Cunning_Man.jpg Source:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/7/71/George_Pickingill%2C_
Cunning_Man.jpg License: Fair use Contributors: This image has come to be widely published in both various books and online. It can be
found on page 38 of E.W. Liddell and Michael Howards The Pickingill Papers (Capall Bann, 1994). Original artist: Unknown
File:Lois_Bourne.JPG Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/cf/Lois_Bourne.JPG License: CC BY-SA 3.0 Contributors: I (Midnightblueowl (talk)) created this work entirely by myself. Original artist: Midnightblueowl (talk)
File:Stnicolaschurchcanewdon.jpg Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/9/9b/Stnicolaschurchcanewdon.jpg License: PD
Contributors: ? Original artist: ?
4.3
Content license