Logic Check Function Check Procedure

,
EPIC FOR GAS SWEETENING FACILITIES PROJECT (GSF)

AT MESAIEED 8: DUKHAN
PART-2 AGRP (OUKHAN)
QP CONTRACT NO. GC08110400

PETROFAC JOB NO. JI-2001
LOGIC CHECKING I FUNCTIONAL CHECKING PROCEDURE
Jgfi-.,JJ~ ~~,!
Qatar Petroleum
Petrofac ~
TITLE:
/1
ll~
A
1
0
REV
Approved for
Construction
Issued for
Information
Issued for
information
DESCRIPTION
,lIZ
LOGIC CHECKING I FUNCTIONAL CHECKING

PROCEDURE
fB
KZ
ZD
02106111
SM
KZ
MD
ZD
DOC SIZE: A4
10/05/11
KZ
BK
MD
ZD
QP PROJECT NO. 2971 (AGRP)
DATE
PRPD
CHKD
APPD
APPD
11/10/11(,
. r DOC. CLASS: 3
Pagel of 15
Rev.
DOCUMENT NO.
2971-0-05-0071
EPIC for Gas Sweetening Facilities Project

(GSF) at Mesaieed &: Oukhan
Part2 AGRP (Dukhan)

Doc. No.: 29710050071
Rev: A
Date: 11/10/11
Page: 2 of 15
Petrofac
Title: Logic Checking I Functional Checking Procedure
1.
Rev. ...
. Para.
o
1
A
I' .Hold No.
11.1,11.2
REVISION DESCRIPTION SHEET

. ......
~ RevisionD~scription
Issued for information

Issued for Information
Approvro for Construction
.....
Iii

(GSF) at Mesaieed & Dukhan
Part-2 AGRP (Dukhan)

Doc. No.: 2971-0-05-0071
Rev: A
Date: 11/10/11
Page: 3 of 15
Petrofac
tJ
CONTENTS
1.0
PURPOSE. ......................................................................................................... 4
2.0
SCOPE ............................................................................................................. 4
3.0
REFERENCES ..................................................................................................... 4
4.0
DEFINITIONS ..................................................................................................... 5
5.0
ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................. 5
6.0
ROLES AND RESPONSiBILITIES ................................................................................ 6
6.1
QP COMMISSIONING TEAM ..................................................................................................6
6.2
CONTRACTOR COMMISSIONING TEAM ..................................................................................... 6
7.0
HEALTH SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENT .................................................. 6
8.0
PRE-REQUiSiTES ................................................................................................. 7
9.0
PROCEDURE ...................................................................................................... 7
9.1
CAUSE AND EFFECT TESTS FIRE AND GAS ...............................................
9.2
CAUSE & EFFECT CHECKS- ESD ............................................................................................ 9
9.2.1
9.2.2
9.2.3
9.2.4
9.2.5
Phase 1 - Testing
Phase 2 - Testing
Phase 3 - Testing
Phase 4 - Testing
Phase 5 - Testing
.. ........................... 7
of Level 4 Shutdown ............................................................................. 10

of Level 3 Shutdown ............................................................................. 10
of Yellow Shutdown (Level 2) .................................................................. 10
of Orange Shutdown (Level 1) .................................................................. 11
of Red Shutdown (Level 0) ..................................................................... 11
9.3
FUNCTION CONTROL LOOP NARRATIVES ............................................................................... 12
10.0
RECORDS AND FORMS ........................................................................................ 13
11.0
ATTACHMENTS ................................................................................................ 13
11.1
ATTACHMENT 1 - FUNCTION CONTROL LOOP NARRATIVES & LOGIC SEQUENCE TEST ......................... 14
11.2
ATTACHMENT 2 - CAUSE & EFFECT DRAWING VERIFICATION CHECK SHEET ..................................... 15

J5fi-,JJ~ ~
Qatar Petroleum

Doc. No.: 2971-0-05-0071
Rev: A
Date: 11/10/11
Page: 4 of 15
Petrofac
&
1.0
PURPOSE
The purpose of this procedure is to describe the minimum applicable requirements and
acceptance criteria for the logic / function testing activities on the Gas Sweetening Facilities
Project (GSF) at Mesaieed & Dukhan. It describes the method for performing the tests that will
demonstrate that the Cause and Effects - F&G, Cause and Effects - ESD and function control
narratives meet the design intent and the project specifications.
2.0
SCOPE
This procedure applies to the plant process and safeguarding, F&G detection equipment and
plant process equipments including all vendor supplied packages at the Acid Gas Removal Plant
Part-2 (AGRP).
3.0
REFERENCES
Scope of Work
Appendix A Part" - AGR, Contract

GC08110400
Commissioning Execution Plan
Doc. No. 2971-0-04-0031
Project's HSSE Plan
Doc. No. 2971-0-04-0015
Emergency Shutdown Philosophy
Doc. No. 2971-6-03-0004
HSE Design Philosophy
Doc. No. 2971-3-03-0001
Cause & Effect Chart - ESD AGRP
Doc. No. 2971-3-55-0003
Cause & Effect Chart - ESD Station N
Doc. No. 2971-3-55-0002
Cause & Effect Chart - FGS AGRP
Doc. No. 2971-3-56-0003
Cause & Effect Chart - FGS Station N
Doc. No. 2971-3-56-0002
QP Corporate Philosophy for Fi re and

Safety
Doc. No. QP-S-PHL-001
Control Narrative
Doc. No. 2971-4-11-0001

(GSF) at Mesaieed &: Dukhan
J5fi-,JJ~ -=
~

Doc_ No_: 2971-0-05-0071
Qatar Petroleum
Rev: A
Date: 11/10/11
Page: 5 of 15
Petrofac
Title: Logic Checking / Functional Checking Procedure
4_0
DEFINITIONS
Commissioning
CONTRACTOR
5.0
Commissioning comprises those activities undertaken after PreCommissioning to verify that the dynamic functioning of
systems and subsystems is in accordance with specified
requirements, and to verify as accurately as possible that the
system is "Ready for Start-Up"_
Equipment
Petrofac International Ltd_ (PILl

All the components other than piping and pipelines and field
instruments_
PetroPCS
Petrofac's Project Completion System
Pre-Commissioning
Pre-Commissioning activities are intended to verify that pieces

of equipment and the associated control loops, shutdown
systems, utility supplies, etc., and equipment alignment are in
the required state of readiness for full dynamic testing_
QP
Qatar Petroleum
Vendor
The supplier of equipments and packages_
ABBREVIATIONS
AGRP
Acid Gas Removal Plant
BGU
Break Glass Unit
CaE
Cause and Effects
ESD
Emergency Shutdown
faG
Fire and Gas
FAT
Factory Acceptance Test
FCN
Function Control Narratives
FGS
Fire, Gas and Smoke
H2 S
Hydrogen Sulphide Gas
HMI
Human Machine Interface
IPS
Instrumented Protective System
LEL
Lower Explosive Limit
JHA
Job Hazard Analysis
MCC
Motor Control Centre
MOS
Maintenance Override Switch
paiD
Piping a Instrument Diagram
PB
Push Button
PPM
Parts Per Million
PTW
Permit to Work
J9fi-.,JJ~ ~
Qatar Petroleum -=
6.0

(GSF) at Mesaieed &: Dukhan
Part2 AGRP (Dukhan)
Doc. No.: 29710050071

Title: logic Checking / Functional Checking Procedure
Rev: A
Date: 11/10/11
Page: 6 of 15
Petrofac
&
ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
6.1
QP Commissioning Team
Responsible for witnessing the logic / functional checking activities.
Responsible for accepting or rejecting the logic / functional checking results.
6.2
CONTRACTOR Commissioning Team

Commissioning Manager / Coordinator
Overall control of CONTRACTOR Commissioning team during the execution of the logic /
functional checking activities.
Liaison with QP Commissioning representatives for executing the logic / functional

checking activities.
Commissioning Engineer
Responsible for the safety of all personnel assigned to him, ensuring that the JHA,
applicable permits and control measures are in place prior to applying the procedure.
Responsible for supporting the testing team and for setting all applicable test
requirements and conditions.
Responsible for coordinatingCthe works with other parties that may be required and parties
affected by executing the procedure.
Responsible for the overall quality of the activities.
Plans the logic / functional checking activities.
Responsible for ensuring QP representative (s) is notified and is at the test site as
required.
Responsible for applying all necessary forces and overrides to reset all executive actions to
a healthy condition and keeping the required records.
Responsible for initiating the change request form in case of any required software
modification such as alarms / trips set points.
Instruments and Controls Technicians
7.0
Responsible for ensuring that the work as outlined in this procedure is performed safely
and all safeguards and controls are complied with.
Responsible for preparing the equipment or system for the activities outlined in this
procedure.
Responsible for executing the tests/activities as outlined in this procedure and as

instructed by the Lead Instruments & Control Commissioning Engineer and/or vendor
representative where applicable.
HEALTH SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENT
All works executed under this procedure shall be performed in accordance with the project's
HSSE Plan.

Doc_ No.: 2971005-0071
Rev: A
Date: 11/10/11
Page: 7 of 15
Petrofac
iJ
Title: logic Checking I Functional Checking Procedure
A Risk Assessment is to be carried out for the all the activities involved with Logic checking
a Functional Checking of the plant.
The Risk Assessment should identify the hazards, persons involved, the risk associated with
the specific activities and the mitigating measures required to reduce the risk and
hazards.
Conduct a 'tool box talk' prior to start of logic checking / functional checking activity to
review Risk Assessment, safety considerations, potential hazards and mitigating measures
for conducting the activity.
8.0
PRE-REQUISITES
Identify the priority systems/sub-systems.
Verify the completion of the duly signed PetroPCS 'A' check sheets as per the system list.
Verify the completion of the duly signed PetroPCS 'B' check sheets as per the system list.
This corresponds to 5-point Instrument Loop check (include FCS alarms and IPS trip set
points) completion ('B' check sheets) duly witnessed and signed off by QP.
Identify the various vendor engineers' involvement during the execution of the work.
Review electrical isolations and equipments preservation status.
Hold a tool box talk involving all concerned parties / members about the testing and test
activities.
Plan the interface with the Vendor, Process, Mechanical and Commissioning teams and QP.
9.0
9.1
PROCEDURE
Ensure all safeguards and controls / isolations / de-isolations are in place before
proceeding with the instructions in the procedure.
Establish the required communication among the relevant teams / crew members.
Complete the Fire a Gas Cause a Effect checks for the specified process area as per
section 9.1.
Complete the ESD Cause a Effect checks for the specified process area as per section 9.2.
Complete the function control narratives checks for the specified process area as per
section 9.3.
CAUSE AND EFFECT TESTS- FIRE AND GAS
Prior to starting the FaG caE checks (while testing individual detectors), Orange ESD
(Level 1) of the respective process area shall be in the 'Off state' (inhibited from
Software).
The Software inhibits on the Orange ESD shall be removed prior to the testing of the voting
logic (Confirmed gas and confirmed fire). At the same time, the effects of the respective
process equipments, blowdown and shutdown valves trip / open / close commands must
be inhibited.

(GSF) at Mesaieed ft Dukhan

Doc_ No.: 2971-0-05-0071
Rev: A
Date: 11/10/11
Page: 8 of 15
Petrofac
All applicable test equipments / test gases, recommended by the vendor (s), must be
made available.
Prior to starting the FaG caE tests, all detectors and associated alarms / indications on
the remote FCS HMI Mimic panel must have been tested as part of the instruments loop
checks (Effects)_
Test Sequence
The testing is in 2 steps.
Testing of individual detectors against low level and high level alarms and their respective
effects.
Testing of the voting logic (2 out of the total number of detectors in a zone / process
area) and verifying the effects_
Testing of Individual detectors and voting logic

Testing of individual detectors and the voting logic verification will be in accordance with the
Cause and Effects matrix_ The following active alarms will be used to verify the plant shutdown
as part of the ESD Cause and Effects tests:
Confirmed flammable gas detection
Confi rmed toxic gas detection
Confirmed heat and flame detectjpn
Confirmed smoke detection
Break glass unit detection
Confirmed Flammable Gas Detection

Individual Flammable gas detectors in all zones will be tested by applying test gas to generate
low level and high level flammable gas alarm indications and check the effects as per the CaE
charts_
The low level alarm settings are as follows:
20% LEL of methane in air for the process areas
10% LEL of methane in air for HVAC air intakes at battery rooms, LER and substation
15% LEL for ventilation and combustion air intakes at EDG and Hot Oil Heater
The high level alarm settings are as follows:
50% LEL of methane in air for the process areas
20% LEL of methane in air for HVAC air intakes at battery rooms, LER and substation
25% LEL for ventilation and combustion air intakes at EDG and Hot Oil Heater
Finally, the voting logic will be tested by applying test gas (60% LEL) to any 2 out of the total
numbers of flammable gas detectors (zone wise) to generate a confirmed gas detection and
the effects will be checked as per the CaE charts.
J9JL,JJ~ ~
Qatar PEtroleum - . :

Part2 AGRP (Dukhan)

Doc. No.: 29710050071
Rev: A
Date: 11/10/11
Page: 9 of 15
Petrofac
Ii;;
Two more '2 00 N' combinations shall be tested to give more assurance. This will not include
the two detectors tested earlier. (One test carried out with sample gas and the other test by
simulation from the marshalling cabinets.)
Confirmed Toxic Gas Detection
Individual HzS detectors in all zones will be tested by applying test gas to generate 10 ppm
indications and the respective high toxic gas alarm effects will be checked as per the CaE
charts.
Finally, the voting logic will be tested by applying test gas to any 2 out of total numbers of HzS
detectors (Process area wise for all zones) to generate confirmed toxic gas detection and the
effects will be checked as per the CaE charts.
the two detectors tested earlier. (One test carried out with sample gas and the other test by
simulation from the marshalling cabinets.)
Confirmed Fire Detection
Individual flame and smoke detectors in all zones will be tested with the use of test
equipments to generate a fire detection (Fire alarm) indication and the respective effects will
be checked as per the CaE charts.
.'
After verification of all the flame and smoke detectors, the voting logic will be testing by
activating '2 00 N' detectors in each Fire Zone to generate a confirmed fire detection alarm and
the effects will be checked as per the CaE charts.
f'"
the two detectors tested earlier. (One test carried out with test equipment and the other test
by simulation from the marshalling cabinets.)
Break Glass Unit Activation

Individual break glass units (Manual alarm call points) in all zones will be tested by removing
the glass to generate a BGU activated alarm indication and the respective effects will be
checked as per the CaE charts.
CAUSE & EFFECT CHECKS- ESD
9.2
Pre-requisites
Verification of all documentation such as, 'B' checks sheets for instrument loop checks of
shutdown valves, blowdown valves, buttons, ESD reset PB, remote ESD PB, all MOS enable
key switches and MOS lamps on the ESD Matrix Panel, all MCC interface signals to FCS/IPS,
in all SUb-systems in a priority turnover system.
Identification of all active components belonging to a particular subsystem I unit

safeguarding such as transmitters, switches, shutdown I blowdown valves, motors etc. and
ensuring that they are in a normal condition.
All applicable test equipments (for simulation of trip alarms) recommended by the vendor
must be made available.

(GSF) at Mesaieed a: Dukhan
Part2 AGRP (Dukhan)
Doc. No.: 29710050071
Rev: A
Date: 11/10/11
Page: 10 of 15
Petrofac
&
Execution
All ESDCaE will be completed in 5 phases in a sequential manner. Against a specific Cause, all
associated Effects ('X' marks) mentioned on the Cause a Effects chart will be verified.
ESD Cause a Effects test will be carried out plant area wise based on the priorities sequence
determined by the project schedule.
This will facilitate turning over the priority process systems for Nitrogen leak test and
subsequent Commissioning activities.
All motors (uncoupled) will be kept in 'test mode' (on the MCC feeder) to ensure no physical
run of the motors. All motors' remote run command I feedback should have been already
tested as part of loop testing.
Except the Effects which are to be tested on the priority Cause a Effects testing system,
remaining all Effects will be inhibited and recorded as per section 10.0 of this document.
9.2.1
Phase 1 - Testing of Level 4 Shutdown
Simulate Plant StartUp on the HMI graphics sheets and confirm that all parameters are
healthy. The technical write of the Start Up sequence, tested as part of the software FAT,
shall be made available during the testing operation.
Individual process IPS trip alarms and machine health monitoring protection trip alarms
will be initiated and the effects will be checked as per the CaE charts (process
equipments trip and shutdown)
9.2.2
Phase 2 - Testing of Level 3 Shutdown
healthy. The technical write of the StartUp sequence, tested as part of the software FAT,
Initiate a process Level 3 ESD as a Cause and verify all associated Effects as per the CaE
charts.
Bring into normal condition by enabling the level 3 ESD reset.
Start the plant up again.
Initiate a Level 3 ESD field PB as a Cause and verify all associated Effects as per the caE
charts.
Bring into normal condition by enabling the level 3 ESD reset.
9.2.3
Phase 3 - Testing of Yellow Shutdown (Level 2)
healthy. The technical write of the StartUp sequence, tested as part of the software FAT,
Initiate a process Yellow ESD as a Cause and verify all associated Effects as per the caE
charts.
Bring into normal condition by enabling the Yellow ESD reset.
Initiate Yellow ESD control room PB (Yellow) as a Cause and verify all associated Effects as
per the CaE charts.

J~~~
Qatar Petroleum _
Doc_ No_: 2971-0-05-0071
Rev: A
Date: 11/10/11
Page:110f15
Petrofac
61
Bring into normal condition by enabling the Yellow ESD reset_
Start the plant up again_
Initiate Yellow ESD field PB as a Cause and verify all associated Effects as per the CaE
charts_
Bring into normal condition by enabling the Yellow ESD Reset_
Initiate confirmed fire and flammable gas signals from the respective fire zone (which
covers the respective process equipment area) and verify that a Yellow ESD is enabled as
Effect.
Reset the Plant_
9.2.4
Phase 4 - Testing of Orange Shutdown (Level 1)
Simulate Plant Start-Up on the HMI graphics sheets and confirm that all parameters are
healthy. The technical write of the Start-Up sequence, tested as part of the software FAT,
Initiate Orange ESD control room PB (Orange) as a Cause and verify all associated Effects
as per the CaE charts.
Bring into normal condition by enabling the Orange ESD reset.
Start the plant up again_
Initiate confirmed fire and flammable gas signals from the respective fire zone (which
covers the respective process equipment area) and verify that an Orange ESD is enabled as
Effect.
Reset the Plant.
Initiate toxic gas from the respective fire zone (which covers the respective process
equipment area) and verify that an Orange ESD is enabled as Effect.
Reset the Plant.
9.2.5
Phase 5 - Testing of Red Shutdown (Level 0)
Simulate Plant Start-Up on the HMI graphics sheets and confirm that all parameters are
healthy. The technical write of the Start-Up sequence, tested as part of the software FAT,
Initiate Red ESD control room PB (Red) as a Cause and verify all associated Effects as per
the CaE charts.
Bring into normal condition by enabling the Red ESD reset.
Initiate Red ESD main gate PB as a Cause and verify all associated Effects as per the CaE
charts.
Bring into normal condition by enabling the Red ESD reset.
Notes:
Effects against a cause which was earlier an Effect itself will not be repeated_
In a process system where multiple sets of equipments are present, ESD caE checks will be

(GSF) at Mesaieed Dukhan

Doc_ No_: 2971-0-05-0071
Rev: A
Date: 11/10/11
Page: 120115
Petrofac
completed by grouping the equipments_ None associated equipments / valves (not part
of the test) shutdowns will be inhibited in the software and recorded as per section 10_0_
These will be removed at the end of the test_
All Cause 8: Effects checks will be tested by keeping the MCC feeders in 'test mode' to
avoid the unnecessary actual runs_ Equipments will be simulated as in normal running
condition (Ex: motor available status healthy condition)_ During the C8:E checks, it shall be
verified that the activation of a respective Cause will result in the motor's available status
turning into trip status without having to physically trip the motor.
A complete EsD C8:E test post Start Up will also be carried out allowing for all cause 8:
effect to take effect_
9_3
FUNCTION CONTROL LOOP NARRATIVES

Pre-requisites
Identification of the priority turnover system/sub-systems since FCN checks will be carried
out on a system/sub-system level or on a group of systems/sub-systems together_
Completion of all field instrument loop checks of shutdown valves, blowdown valves,
control valves, vendor packages instruments, FCs and IPS transmitters, EsD push buttons,
EsD reset push buttons, remote EsD PB, all MOs enable key switches on the hard wired
console, MOs lamps on the local panels, all MCC interface signals to FCs/ IPS and
verification of the check sheets have been completed and loaded into PetroPCs_
Identification of all the active components belonging to a particular system/sub-system_

Initially all the necessary controllers (Pressure, level, temperature) actions (direct or
reverse) will be verified as in the control narrative document_
All applicable test equipments (for simulation of trip alarms) recommended by the vendors
must be made available_
At any stage 5-point instrument checks will not be repeated_
Prior to FCN, all the controllers will be confirmed in Manual mode and all the valves will
be opened manually from respective controller.
Execution
The control narrative shall be verified, line by line to ensure that the correct
implementation of the program_
Air fails action to be verified in the field as per the control narrative document.
For controllers working in Manual, Auto or Cascade, the applicable mode will be checked_
Controllers action in Auto mode, Cascade mode, Ratio mode as applicable are tested on
the FCs HMI by varying (rising / decreasing) the process value the software simulation
blocks_
Direct / reverse action will also be confirmed in the manner described above_
Split range control action will also be confirmed in the manner described above_
All these are confirmed during the software FAT and will be tested again during SIT and
subsequently signed off by QP_
Notes:
Jgfi-.,JJ~ ~
Qatar Petroleum -==
Doc_ No.: 2971-0-05-0071
Rev: A
Date: 11/10/11
Page: 13 of 15
Petrofac
Simulation of the process alarms mentioned in the control narrative will be with test
equipments from the marshalling cabinets, wherever possible.
Possible simulation of process input values will be completed from the software by
changing the values (rising / decreasing) to avoid the use of 2 or more communicators.
All the process input signals from the field instrument are already tested as part of the
instrument loop checks.
Any deviations from the control narrative shall be recorded on the punch list and
corrected at a later stage under the control of a software change request.
10.0
11.0

RECORDS AND FORMS
A 'overrides, inhibits and forced signals' log book shall be maintained inline with the
requirements of the procedure for control of overrides, inhibits and forced signals (Doc.
No. 2971-4-05-0005) to record/track the various bypasses installation/removal.
A Master copy of the caE-ESD, CaE-FaG, Function control narratives will be made
available in Control room HMPS and all tests will be recorded on it. These copies will be
later signed off by CONTRACTOR and QP for record keeping.
A detailed log book (Engineering deviations) will be maintained inline with the software
change control procedure (Doc. No. 2971-4-05-0002) to record the deviations of configured
alarms and trip set points on the graphics and on the project's 'Alarm, Trip a Set-point
schedule' .
"The PetroPCS check sheets attached in section 11.0 of this document are applicable for
this procedure
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment 1 - Function Control Loop Narratives a Logic Sequence Test
Attachment 2 - Cause a Effect Drawing Verification Check Sheet

J9~~~
Rev: A
Date: 11/10/11

Doc. No.: 29710050071
Qatar PEtroleum _
Page: 14 of 15
Petrofac
Attachment 1 - Function Control Loop Narratives 8: Logic Sequence Test
11.1
("
FUNCI ~~~~~~~~ LOOP
J9Ji-,JJ~ ~f1l,!
Qatar PEtroleum
Petrofac ~
TAG
rrR tlo:
Project No: SubProj4tCt.~
LOGIC / SEQUENCE TEST
BarcodeIte
m
Record Ho~
SUS-SYSTEM Ho.
No.
DRAWING
Cu\'A "un
I-0105C
Rev. : 1
DATA SHEET No.
No.
~~::g~.NO:
I AREA
LooP
Sht. N6.
, ~'Q""' No.
SHT. NO.
Rev. No.
Equipment mentioned in Control Narrative:

Instrument Tag Nos. mentioned in Control Narrative:
Control Narrative Description:
..
,-
I OF TEST
TEST RESULTS
NOTE: Associated 'Control loop Narratives 'Document is to be attached.

REMARKS:
COMPLETED BY
Signature
Name
Date
APPROVED BY
ACCEPTED BY

(GSF) at Mesaieed a: Dukhan
J~fl--,JJ~ ~~

Doc_ No.: 2971-0-05-0071
Qatar Petroleum
Rev: A
Date: 11/10/11
Page: 15 of 15
Petrofac
Attachment 2 - Cause & Effect Drawing Verification Check Sheet
11.2
Commissioning Check Sheet

Cause & Effect Drawing
Verification Check Sheet
J~jL,JJ~ ~
Qatar PetrolEum' ~
Petrofac ~
ITR No: 1-0106C

Rev.: 1
Project No:
~SubProjact~
BarcodeIte
Record No:
m
TAG No.
SUB-SYSTEM No.
DRAWING No.
DATA SHEET No_
Control I Safeguarding System Site Acceptance Shall be in accordance with the manufacturers
recommendations and with the factory acceptance test Procedures and results
Item
1.
2.
3.
Description of check
Result
All items shown on Cause a Effect Drawings shaU be proven during precommissioning
Causes andJ,ffect aGtions checked and confirmed as per the Cause a Effect
Drawinll Data
Attach As built CaE Drawinll sil/ned by company as witnessed for full or part CaE
test from field input to field output
REMARKS/OBSERVATIONS:
COMPLETED BY
Signature
Name
Date
APPROVED BY
ACCEPTED BY

Logic Check Function Check Procedure

Încărcat de

Informații document

Drepturi de autor

Formate disponibile

Partajați acest document

Partajați sau inserați document

Opțiuni de partajare

Vi se pare util acest document?

Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

Logic Check Function Check Procedure

Încărcat de

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

,

EPIC FOR GAS SWEETENING FACILITIES PROJECT (GSF)

QP CONTRACT NO. GC08110400

LOGIC CHECKING I FUNCTIONAL CHECKING PROCEDURE

LOGIC CHECKING I FUNCTIONAL CHECKING

QP PROJECT NO. 2971 (AGRP)

EPIC for Gas Sweetening Facilities Project

Part2 AGRP (Dukhan)

Title: Logic Checking I Functional Checking Procedure

I' .Hold No.

REVISION DESCRIPTION SHEET

Issued for information

EPIC for Gas Sweetening Facilities Project

Part-2 AGRP (Dukhan)

Title: Logic Checking I Functional Checking Procedure

ROLES AND RESPONSiBILITIES ................................................................................ 6

QP COMMISSIONING TEAM ..................................................................................................6

CONTRACTOR COMMISSIONING TEAM ..................................................................................... 6

HEALTH SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENT .................................................. 6

CAUSE AND EFFECT TESTS FIRE AND GAS ...............................................

CAUSE & EFFECT CHECKS- ESD ............................................................................................ 9

of Level 4 Shutdown ............................................................................. 10

FUNCTION CONTROL LOOP NARRATIVES ............................................................................... 12

RECORDS AND FORMS ........................................................................................ 13

ATTACHMENT 2 - CAUSE & EFFECT DRAWING VERIFICATION CHECK SHEET ..................................... 15

EPIC for Gas Sweetening Facilities Project

Part-2 AGRP (Dukhan)

Title: Logic Checking I Functional Checking Procedure

Appendix A Part" - AGR, Contract

Commissioning Execution Plan

Doc. No. 2971-0-04-0031

Project's HSSE Plan

Doc. No. 2971-0-04-0015

Emergency Shutdown Philosophy

Doc. No. 2971-6-03-0004

HSE Design Philosophy

Doc. No. 2971-3-03-0001

Cause & Effect Chart - ESD AGRP

Doc. No. 2971-3-55-0003

Cause & Effect Chart - ESD Station N

Doc. No. 2971-3-55-0002

Cause & Effect Chart - FGS AGRP

Doc. No. 2971-3-56-0003

Cause & Effect Chart - FGS Station N

Doc. No. 2971-3-56-0002

QP Corporate Philosophy for Fi re and

Doc. No. QP-S-PHL-001

Doc. No. 2971-4-11-0001

EPIC for Gas Sweetening Facilities Project

Part-2 AGRP (Dukhan)

Title: Logic Checking / Functional Checking Procedure

Petrofac International Ltd_ (PILl

Petrofac's Project Completion System

Pre-Commissioning activities are intended to verify that pieces

The supplier of equipments and packages_

Acid Gas Removal Plant

Break Glass Unit

Cause and Effects

Fire and Gas

Factory Acceptance Test

Function Control Narratives

Fire, Gas and Smoke

Hydrogen Sulphide Gas

Human Machine Interface