Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Journal of Philosophy, Inc. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Journal
of Philosophy.
http://www.jstor.org
68o
NOTION OF NOEMA
IHUSSERL'S
68i
682
other times just a part of it, a part which may be the same in acts
of many different kinds, e.g., acts of perception, remembering, imagining, etc. Our second thesis is therefore the following:
2. A noema has two components: (1) one which is common to all acts
that have the same object, with exactly the same properties,oriented
in the same way, etc., regardlessof the "thetic"characterof the act,
i.e., whether it be perception, remembering,imagining, etc. and (2)
one which is differentin acts with differentthetic character.
The first of these components Husserl calls "noematischer Sinn"
(321.38) and also, alternatively, "der Gegenstand im wie seiner
Bestimmtheiten" (321.37) and "gegenstindlicher Sinn" (250.4). Compare also 249.11 and 322.4. The second component he calls the noematic correlate of the "Gegebenheitsweise" of the object (323.18,
250.16) or of the "Weise, wie der Gegenstand bewusst ist." 2 An important part of the "Gegebenheitsweise" is the "thetic character,"
the "Setzungscharacter" of the act (323.18; cf. also NuS 6). Another
part that enters into the "Gegebenheitsweise" is the "filling," the
"Anschauungssinn." As we should expect, Husserl says that the second component, like the first, can be regarded as a component of
the act's "Sinn" in an extended sense (223.17-18). In the Logical
Investigations (5. Unters., ?? 20-21), Husserl calls the first component "Materie," the second "Qualitat" and the two together "Sinn."
In Ideen, Husserl normally uses 'Sinn' for the first component, 'Noema' for the two together.
A third thesis is the following:
3. The noematic Sinn is that in virtue of which consciousnessrelates to
the object.
This thesis, too, is well supported by the Husserlian text. Thus,
in Ideen, I, 316.15: "Consciousness relates in and through this Sinn
to its object." And "each intentional experience has a noema and
in it a Sinn, through which it relates to the object" (329.9). Compare also 316.18 and 318.18.
A key point in Husserl's phenomenology is the following:
4. The noema of an act is not the object of the act (i.e., the object towardwhich the act is directed).
This is a crucial difference between Husserl and Brentano: Brentano's dilemma, mentioned at the beginning of this paper, arose because he held that the object that gives the act its directedness is
2 From the unpublished manuscript Noema und Sinn, p. 6; in the following,
this manuscript will be referred to as "NuS" and followed by page number.
683
684
685
686
of a Sinn ...
Sinn of the Sinn may in its turn be made an object and then again
has a Sinn and so on" (NuS 107-108). As Husserl points out, this
again has a consequencethat "the Sinn cannot be a real component
of the object"(NuS 108).
This is one of many striking similarities between Husserl's notion of noema and Frege'snotion of Sinn. There are also important
differences,however. Thus, for example, whereas Frege held that,
in contexts like 'believes that . .
.',
they become perspectivesthrough that which we also call apprehen3"Ober Sinn und Bedeutung," Zeitschriftfafr Philosophie und philosophische
Kritik,c (1892):27.
4 ldeen, I, 100 and 238 ff. Cf. Frege, loc. cit.
5 PhanomenotogischePsychologie, Beilage xvii, Husserliana nK, pp. 43434.
REFERENCE,ESSENTIALISM,MODALITY
687
sion (Auffassung), just that which gives them the subjective function of being appearances of the objective" (op. cit., 163.11-17).
It is in this way, through perspectives, that we perceive objects.
As long as the further course of our experience fits into the more
or less vaguely predelineated pattern, we continue to perceive the
same object and get an ever more "many-sided" experience of it,
without ever exhausting the pattern, which develops with our experience of the object to include ever new, still unexperienced determinations. Sometimes our experiences do not fit into the predelineated pattern. We get an "explosion" of the noema, and a new
noema of a new and different object. We were subject to misperception, to illusion or hallucination, as the case may be, and we say
that the old act did not have the object that it seemed to have.
12. This pattern of determinations,together with the "Gegebenheitsweise,"is the noema.
My twelve theses concerning the noema by no means exhaust the
subject; they barely put us in a position to ask questions like: If
phenomenology is a study of meaning, in an extended sense, then
what light does it throw upon the questions concerning meaning
that have played a major role in philosophy since its beginnings
and which are a major concern of so many contemporary philosophers? Does phenomenology overcome the difficulties that are besetting so many ancient and recent theories of meaning? A close
study of Husserl's work can, I think, give partial answers to these
questions. And, even if the answers should be negative, I trust that
such a study will help to bring out more clearly what these difficulties consist in.
DAGFINN F0LLESDAL
University of Oslo
REFERENCE,ESSENTIALISM,AND MODALITY*
G