Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
1 of 12
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propaganda:_The_Formation_of_Men's_Att...
1 Authorship
2 Background
3 Summary of chapters
4 Major themes
4.1 "The Lonely Crowd"
4.2 Fundamental currents in society
5 See also
6 References
7 Further reading
Author
Jacques Ellul
Country
United States
Language
English
Publisher
Vintage Books
Pages
320
ISBN
978-0-394-71874-3
During World War II, Ellul was a leader in the French resistance after being discharged as a professor from
French universities by the Vichy regime.[1] After France's liberation, he became professor at the University of
Bordeaux. He authored 58 books and numerous articles over his lifetime, the dominant theme of which has been
the threat to human freedom created by modern technology. In 1947, Ellul was appointed chair of law and social
history at the Institut d'tudes politiques that increased his reputation as a social and political philosopher which
led to the publication of his works in the United States.
Propaganda has long been recognized as a general phenomenon in the modern world. As early as 1928, Edward
Bernays recognized propaganda as a modern instrument to be utilized to produce productive ends and help
2/11/2015 10:40 PM
2 of 12
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propaganda:_The_Formation_of_Men's_Att...
bring order out of chaos.[2] Since then, there has been great difficulty in determining what constitutes
propaganda in our world and what the nature of propaganda is because it is a secret action. For a long time,
propaganda was simplistically viewed as being able to modify sentiments and attitudes of an individual without
their being conscious of such an attempt. This limited perspective of propaganda as being only able to influence
the individual psychologically was prevalent from 1920 to around 1933. Once reassessed though more emphasis
was placed on the intention of the propagandist and another objective of propaganda concerned with sparking
an individual to action was recognized. The Institute for Propaganda Analysis, inspired by Harold Lasswell
defined propaganda as the expression of opinions or actions carried out deliberately by individuals or groups
with a view to influencing the opinions or actions of other individuals or groups for predetermined ends and
through psychological manipulations.[3]
This definition seemed more accurate and was supported by others such as Goebbels, a German propagandist,
who stated, "We do not talk to say something, but to obtain a certain effect."[4] Similarly F.C. Bartlett holds an
accurate interpretation of the goal of propaganda as not merely as an instrument to increase political
understanding of events, but to obtain results through action. Ellul supports the idea that propaganda is made
primarily because of a will to action for the purpose of effectively arming policy made by the State. Leonard
Doob, an American specialist, defined propaganda in 1948 as "the attempt to affect the personalities and to
control the behavior of individuals towards desired ends."[5] Unending definitions show the uncertainty among
specialists and the inability of definitions to encompass all that is propaganda. Just because the term propaganda
cannot be defined with any degree of precision does not mean that attempts to define it should be abandoned.
"Very frequently propaganda is described as a manipulation for the purpose of changing idea or
opinions of making individuals 'believe' some idea or fact, and finally of making them adhere to
some doctrineall matters of the mind. It tries to convince, to bring about a decision, to create a
firm adherence to some truth. This is a completely wrong line of thinking: to view propaganda as
still being what it was in 1850 is to cling to an obsolete concept of man and of the means to
influence him; it is to condemn oneself to understand nothing about propaganda. The aim of modern
propaganda is no longer to modify ideas, but to provoke action. It is no longer to change adherence
to a doctrine, but to make the individual cling irrationally to a process of action. It is no longer to
transform an opinion but to arouse an active and mythical belief."[6]
Ellul does not dispute these traditional notions, though in this book he argues that modern propaganda is viewed
from an incomplete perspective. He holds that the main concern of propaganda through psychological influence
is sparking action to a desired response by developing learned attitudes. Prior attempts to define propaganda
failed to fully elaborate on the development of learned attitudes, thus ignoring the sociological influences of
propaganda by placing more emphasis on the psychological influences. Ellul maintains that modern propaganda
is based on scientific analyses of both psychology and sociology.
Propaganda: The Formation of Men's Attitudes is divided into five substantive chapters discussing Elluls
analysis.
Introduction
Regardless of the State, propaganda should be viewed as situated at the center of the growing powers of
governmental and administrative techniques.
2/11/2015 10:40 PM
3 of 12
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propaganda:_The_Formation_of_Men's_Att...
"Differences in political regimes matter little; differences in social levels are more important; and
most important is national self-awareness. Propaganda is a good deal less the political weapon of a
regime (it is that also) than the effect of a technological society that embraces the entire man and
tends to be a completely integrated society. Propaganda stops man from feeling that things in
society are oppressive and persuades him to submit with good grace."[7]
Chapter One: Characteristics of Propaganda
Modern propaganda is a technique that requires an analysis of both environment and individual to be subjected
to propaganda. Therefore, it is based on scientific analyses of psychology and sociology. Sufficient
understanding of these two areas creates the most effective propaganda, and without the scientific research of
modern psychology and sociology there would be no propaganda. Step by step the propagandist builds the
techniques on the basis of his knowledge of man, his tendencies, his desires, his needs, his psychic mechanisms,
his conditioning, and as much on social psychology as on depth psychology.[8]
1. Part One: External Characteristics
Propaganda is first and foremost concerned with influencing an individual psychologically by creating
convictions and compliance through imperceptible techniques that are effective only by continuous repetition.
Propaganda employs encirclement on the individual by trying to surround man by all possible routes, in the
realm of feelings as well as ideas, by playing on his will or his needs through his conscious and his unconscious,
and by assailing him in both his private and his public life.[9] The propagandist also acknowledges the most
favorable moment to influence man is when an individual is caught up in the masses. Propaganda must be total
in that utilizes all forms of media to draw the individual into the net of propaganda. Propaganda is designed to be
continuous within the individual's life by filling the citizens entire day. It is based on slow constant impregnation
that functions over a long period of time exceeding the individuals capacities for attention or adaptation and
thus his capabilities of resistance. In order for propaganda to maintain encirclement, it must be exerted by an
organization capable of influencing psychological channels that reach the individual. Psychological and physical
actions are inseparable elements to propaganda, however, if no influence is exerted by an organization than
there can be no propaganda because it cannot operate in a vacuum. The necessity for a physical organization
limits propaganda enterprises and in order to be effective propaganda must work inside a group, principally
inside a nation. Propaganda must first organize the masses in order to propagandize within the masses. In
general, propaganda is a set of methods employed by an organized group that wants to bring about the active or
passive participation in its actions of a mass of individuals, psychologically unified through psychological
manipulations and incorporated into an organization.[10] Propaganda should no longer be viewed in terms of an
orthodoxy but rather modern propaganda should be seen as an orthopraxy because it aims for participation not
adherence. Participation can be active or passive: active if propaganda has been able to mobilize the individual
for action; passive if the individual does not act directly but psychologically supports that action.
2. Part Two: Internal Characteristics
The second major element that a propagandist must understand is the environment in which the individual
operates, mainly the foci of interest of the public. An understanding of the conventional patterns and stereotypes
that pre-exist in a milieu provide the propagandist with material from which to build off. Propaganda is not able
to create something out of nothing and is confined to developing pre-existing material thereby expressing the
fundamental currents of the society it seeks to influence. These currents include accepted structures such as
collective sociological presuppositions and myths that are fundamental to society.
"The Four Great Collective Sociological Presuppositions in the Modern World:
2/11/2015 10:40 PM
4 of 12
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propaganda:_The_Formation_of_Men's_Att...
2/11/2015 10:40 PM
5 of 12
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propaganda:_The_Formation_of_Men's_Att...
the environment that is of a collective nature by developing compliance with or defense of the established order
through long term penetration and progressive adaptation by using all social currents. The propaganda element is
the way of life with which the individual is permeated and then the individual begins to express it in film,
writing, or art without realizing it. This involuntary behavior creates an expansion of society through advertising,
the movies, education, and magazines. "The entire group, consciously or not, expresses itself in this fashion; and
to indicate, secondly that its influence aims much more at an entire style of life."[14] This type of propaganda is
not deliberate but springs up spontaneously or unwittingly within a culture or nation. This propaganda reinforces
the individuals way of life and represents this way of life as best. Sociological propaganda creates an
indisputable criterion for the individual to make judgments of good and evil according to the order of the
individuals way of life. Sociological propaganda does not result in action, however, it can prepare the ground
for direct propaganda. From then on, the individual in the clutches of such sociological propaganda believes that
those who live this way are on the side of the angels, and those who dont are bad.[15]
Vertical vs. Horizontal Propaganda: Vertical propaganda is similar to direct propaganda that aims at the
individual in the mass and is renewed constantly. However, in horizontal propaganda there is no top down
structure but rather it springs up from within the group. It involves meticulous encirclement that traps an
individual involuntarily in dialectic. The individual is led unfailingly to its adherence by talking about the
dialectic until the individual discovers the answer that was set up unconsciously for him to find. Schools are a
primary mechanism for integrating the individual into the way of life.
Rational vs. Irrational Propaganda: Propaganda is addressed to the individual on the foundation of feelings
and passions which are irrational, however, the content of propaganda does address reason and experience when
it presents information and furnishes facts making it rational as well. It is important for propaganda to be rational
because modern man needs relation to facts. Modern man wants to be convinced that by acting in a certain way
he is obeying reason in order to have self-justification. The challenge is creating an irrational response on the
basis of rational and factual elements by leaving an impression on an individual that remains long after the facts
have faded away. Individuals are not compelled to act based facts but rather on emotional pressure, the vision of
the future, or the myth.
Agitation vs. Integration propaganda: Propaganda of agitation seeks to mobilize people in order to destroy
the established order and/or government. It seeks rebellion by provoking a crisis or unleashing explosive
movements during one. It momentarily subverts the habits, customs, and beliefs that were obstacles to making
great leap forward by addressing the internal elements in each of us. It eradicates the individual out of his
normal framework and then proceeds to plunge him into enthusiasm by suggesting extraordinary goals which
nevertheless seem to him completely within reach. However, this enthusiasm can only last a short duration so
the objective must be achieved quickly followed by a period of rest. People cannot be kept at in a state of
perpetual enthusiasm and insecurity. Rebellion is incited by the propagandist who knows that hate is one of the
most profitable resources when drawn out of an individual. Agitation propaganda is usually thought of as
propaganda in that it aims to influence people to act. Integration propaganda, on the other hand, is a more subtle
form that aims to reinforce cultural norms. This is sociological in nature because it provides stability to society
by supporting the way of life and the myths within a culture. It is propaganda of conformity that requires
participation in the social body. This type of propaganda is more prominent and permanent, yet it is not as
recognized as agitation propaganda because it is more permanent manner. Basically, agitation propaganda
provides the motive force when needed and when not needed integration propaganda provides the context and
backdrop.
Chapter Two: The Condition for the Existence of Propaganda
The nature of propaganda has changed over the course of time and yet it is evident that propaganda cannot exist
without a milieu. The emergence of propaganda is interconnected with technology and scientific discoveries yet
2/11/2015 10:40 PM
6 of 12
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propaganda:_The_Formation_of_Men's_Att...
it can only appear and grow under certain conditions. Several events have occurred that have furthered
propaganda by increasing its ability in depth and discovering new methods. Modern propaganda could not exist
without the mass media or modern means of transportation which permit crowds of diverse individuals from all
over to assemble easily and frequently.
1. Part One: The Sociological Conditions
Society must contain elements of both an individualist society and a mass society. Propaganda aims to capture
both the mass and the individual at the same time through this dual type of society. A mass society is based on
individuals that are reduced to ciphers based on what they have in common to others. First conditions for growth
and development of modern propaganda: it emerged in Western Europe in the nineteenth century and the first
half of the twentieth precisely because that was when society was becoming increasingly individualistic and its
organic structures were breaking down. Individuals without natural organic local groups are defenseless and
more likely to be caught up in a social current. On the other hand, a mass society has considerable population
density in which local structures and organizations are weak, currents of opinion are strongly felt creating a
certain psychological unity, and individuals are organized into large and influential collectives. Mass society is
characterized by uniformity and material life despite differences of environment. Once a mass society is created,
public opinion will begin to play a role to help individuals form their own personal opinion. Public opinion can
only express itself through channels which are provided by the mass media of communication without which
there could be no propaganda. Yet it is important that mass media be subject to centralized control in order to
successfully form public opinion without any opposition. Again Ellul mentions that the individual must be
caught in wide net of media through all channels. Once opinion has been formed, propaganda is able to reinforce
it and transform opinion into action.
2. Part Two: Objective Conditions of Total Propaganda
Propaganda thrives off of what individuals have in common with others to develop patterns of behavior and
modify cultural opinions. Total propaganda recognizes that within a nation individuals should all have in
common a standard of living, a culture, and an ideology. The need of an average standard of living is that people
must be able to afford to buy a radio, TV, a newspaper, or go to the movies. It is mostly concerned with the
densest mass which is made up of average men and not the very rich or very poor. Poor cannot do this therefore
they cannot be subjected to integration propaganda because the immediate concerns of daily life absorb all their
capacities and efforts. The poor can only be subjected to agitation propaganda, excited to the point of theft and
murder. But they cannot be trained by propaganda, kept in hand, channeled, and oriented. More advanced
propaganda can influence only a man who is not completely haunted by poverty, a man who can view things
from a certain distance and be reasonably unconcerned about his daily bread, who therefore can take an interest
in more general matters.
"For propaganda to be effective the propagandee must have a certain store of ideas and a number
of conditioned reflexes that can only be acquired through peace of mind springing from relative
security. The establishment of a mode of common life- all this leads to the creation of a type of
normal man conveniently leads all men toward that norm via a multitude of paths. Propagandas
intent is to integrate people into the normal pattern prevailing in society bring about conformance to
way of life. To sum up: The creation of normalcy in our society can take one of two shapes. It can
be the result of scientific, psycho-sociological analysis based on statistics- that is the American type
of normalcy. It can be ideological and doctrinaire- that is the Communist type. But the results are
identical: such normalcy necessarily gives rise to propaganda that can reduce the individual to the
pattern most useful to society."[16]
2/11/2015 10:40 PM
7 of 12
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propaganda:_The_Formation_of_Men's_Att...
Information Is an essential element of propaganda, which must have reference to political or economic
reality to be credible. In fact, no propaganda can work until the moment when a set of facts has become a
problem in the eyes of those who constitute public opinion. Education permits the dissemination of propaganda
in that it enables people to consume information. Information is indistinguishable from propaganda in that
information is an essential element of propaganda because for propaganda to succeed it must have reference to
political or economic reality. Propaganda grafts itself onto an already existing reality through informed
opinion. Where no informed opinion with regard to political or economic affairs propaganda cannot exist
making it an indispensable aspect. Propaganda means nothing without preliminary information that provides the
basis for propaganda, gives propaganda the means to operate, and generates the problems that propaganda
exploits by pretending to offer solutions. It is through information that the individual is placed in a social context
and learns to understand the reality of his own situation. Information allows us to evaluate our situation feel our
own personal problems are a general social problem thus enabling propaganda to entice us into social and
political action. Information is most effective when it is objective and broad because it creates a general picture.
With information quantity is better than quality, the more political or economic facts believed to be mastered by
an individual, the more sensitive their judgment is to propaganda. In fact, only in and through propaganda do the
masses have access to political economy, politics, art, or literature. The more stereotypes in a culture, the easier
it is to form public opinion, and the more an individual participates in that culture, the more susceptible he
becomes to the manipulation of these symbols.
Chapter Three: The Necessity for Propaganda
All propaganda is based on a need, a dual need, first there is the need of state to make it and second there is the
need of propagandee to receive it. These two needs compliment and correspond to each other in the
development of propaganda. Propaganda is an expression of modern society as a whole.
1. Part One: The State's Necessity
The State has the need to make propaganda to integrate citizens into its society, to disseminate information, and
to increase participation and involvement of members of society. Sometimes the people want to take part in
government affairs. However, the official leaders cannot disconnect themselves from what the people want.
Being that the people in charge can't escape the people, bait must be presented to them. This acts as a disguise
that must be there to hide what is really happening behind the scenes in the government . Citizens are aware that
political decisions affect everybody and governments cannot govern without the support, presence, pressure, or
knowledge of the people. Yet the people are incapable of making long term policy so opinion must be created to
follow the government because the government cannot be led by opinion. All of this describes the "MassGovernment" relationship characterized by people demanding what has already been decided, in order to appear
as though the government is actually caring about what the people need. The next part that the book discusses is
psychological warfare. It is believed to be a peace policy that is used between nations as a form of aggression.
This type of propaganda changes the public opinion of an opposing regime so that it can be in favor of their
regime.
2. Part Two: The Individuals Necessity
The individual needs propaganda to gain satisfaction as a member of society. Individuals want to be informed
and to participate in the decisions of the state. Propaganda is the outlet through which individuals obtain the
satisfaction of having contributed to the state. It is a necessary instrument of a state or institution to spread
information to members of the group or society. But for propaganda to succeed it must respond to a need on the
individuals part as well. The individual is by no means just an innocent victim of propaganda when in fact he
provokes the psychological action of propaganda by not merely lending himself to it, but also from deriving
satisfaction from it. It is strictly a sociological phenomenon, in the sense that it has its roots and reasons in the
need of the group that will sustain it. The great role performed by propaganda is in its ability to give the people
2/11/2015 10:40 PM
8 of 12
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propaganda:_The_Formation_of_Men's_Att...
the involvement they crave or the illusion of it in order for the masses to be artificially satisfied. Individuals are
faced with decisions which require a range of information that the individual does not and cannot have without
propaganda. Thus, the individual is unable to accept that he cannot form opinion on his own and is caught
between his desire and his inability. People are willing and likely to accept propaganda that allows them to
artificially satisfy their desire to have an opinion by hiding their incompetence. The individual does not mind
being given preconceived positions because otherwise he would realize that he does not understand the
problems of the modern world. The individual would then realize that he "depends on situations of which he has
no control" and have to face this reality. The individual cannot live in the state of this harsh reality so he derives
satisfaction from the veil created by the ideology and the sense of values it provides. The individual need
psychological and ideological reasons why he needs to be where he is and propaganda is the mechanism that the
state uses for this very purpose.
Chapter Four: Psychological Effects of Propaganda
The psychological effects of propaganda on an individual cannot be ignored. The individual undergoes profound
changes while being propagandized mainly the diminishment of personal activity. "Propaganda furnishes
objectives, organizes the traits of an individual into a system, and freezes them into a mold by standardizing
current ideas, hardening the prevailing stereotypes, and furnishing thought patterns in all areas."[17] The
individual is traumatized by the overwhelming force of propaganda that intensifies the prejudices and beliefs
until eventually the individual has no control over his own impulses. It seeks to push the individual into the mass
until his will fades entirely into that of the mass. Individuality is sacrificed for the greater cause of the nation by
uniting him and blending him with others. Critical and personal judgment are subdued and replaced with
ready-made attitudes and opinions. Discernment is made nearly impossible for the individual whose ability to
judge is destroyed making him dependent on propagandas ready-made opinions from then on. The individual
can no longer exercise his own judgment and becomes honed into what propaganda tells him. He no longer
expresses himself but his group once he accepts public opinion as his own. The artificial, impersonal public
opinion created by propaganda is absorbed by the individual and he becomes filled with its conviction. When he
is fully integrated in the social group and can no longer distinguish between himself and society than he has
reached total alienation. In this process, the individuals personal inclinations lead to participation in the
collective where he loses control and submits to external impulses. The individual is suppressed psychologically
so that he can continue to live under the conditions in which society places him by providing an artificial and
unreal reality that is the result of powerful propaganda.
Chapter Five: The Socio-Political Effects
"In the nineteenth century, the problem of opinion formation through the expression of thought was
essentially a problem of contacts between the State and the individual, and a problem of acquisition
of freedom. But today, thanks to the mass media, the individual finds himself outside the battle that
is now between the State and powerful groups. The freedom to express ideas is no longer at stake in
this debate but it has been replaced by mastery and domination by the State or some powerful
groups over the formation of opinion. The individual is not in the battle because he is the stake and
the battle will determine what voice he will be permitted to hear and which words will have the
power to obsess him."[18]
1. Part One: Propaganda and Ideology
An ideology provides society certain beliefs and no social group can exist without the foundation of these
beliefs. Propaganda is the means by which an ideology can expand without force. An ideology is either fortified
within a group or expanded beyond the borders of a group through propaganda. However, propaganda is less
2/11/2015 10:40 PM
9 of 12
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propaganda:_The_Formation_of_Men's_Att...
and less concerned with spreading the ideology nowadays as it is with becoming autonomous. The ideology is no
longer the decisive factor of propaganda that must be obeyed by the propagandist. The propagandist cannot be
constrained by the ideology of his State but must operate in service of the state and be able to manipulate the
ideology as if it were an object. The ideology merely provides the content for the propagandist to build off since
he is limited to what already is present within the group, nation, or society. The fundamental ideologies are
nationalism, socialism, communism, and democracy.
2. Part Two: Effects on the Structure of Public Opinion
Public opinion is an instrument of propaganda that is disseminated through the mass media of communication to
the masses. While most people view the formation of public opinion as being shaped itself by interaction
between different viewpoints on controversial questions, this is incorrect because public opinion is delineated by
propaganda as a truth which is either believed or not believed. Public opinion ceases to be controversial and
can no longer form itself except through channels of mass media. No opinion can be held until it is
communicated to the masses through mass media. Propaganda uses public opinion to externalize inner opinions
of the organization to the masses that eventually produces conformity.[19]
3. Part Three: Propaganda and Grouping
In regards to propaganda, there are two groups: the groups that make propaganda and the groups that are
subjected to propaganda. In Ellul's view, there is a "double foray on the part of propaganda that proves the
excellence of one group and the evilness of another at the same time to create partitioning". This creates
isolation between groups by promoting allegiance to the group one is in and suppressing conversation between
groups. The more they listen to their propaganda the stronger their beliefs and the greater their justifications for
their actions. Partitioning takes place on many different levels including class, religious, political, national and
blocs of nations. A superior group is able to affect the lesser groups, however, groups that have an equal amount
of influence will only separate further from one another in that a members allegiance to a group develops closed
mindedness. Well-organized propaganda is able to work with different elements that exist within a nation such
as religion, political parties, and labor groups.
4. Part Four: Propaganda and Democracy
Since democracy depends on public opinion, it is clear that propaganda must be involved. The relationship
between democracy and propaganda evidently presents a conflict between the principles of democracy and the
processes of propaganda. The individual is viewed as the cornerstone of a democracy which is a form of
government that is made for the people and by the people. However, as discussed in early chapters Ellul
described the masses are incapable of making long-term foreign policy and the government needs to make these
decisions in a timely manner. This is where propaganda comes into play and projects an artificial reality to the
masses to satisfy their need to participate in government while the decisions are really made behind the scenes.
This was also describe earlier as the "mass-government" relationship. Democratic regimes develop propaganda
in line with its myths and prejudices. Propaganda stresses the superiority of a democratic society while
intensifying the prejudices between democratic and oppressive.
Propaganda: The Formation of Men's Attitudes builds on prior notions of propaganda to demonstrate that
while propaganda is psychological in nature it is just as much sociological in nature as well. Propaganda is not
just embedded into the individual's psyche but also the cultural psyche. Propaganda works off the inner
characteristics of both the individual and the society that the individual belongs. This thorough analysis made by
Ellul illustrates that to downplay the importance of the sociological influences of propaganda to psychological
2/11/2015 10:40 PM
10 of 12
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propaganda:_The_Formation_of_Men's_Att...
ones is a dreadful error. Propaganda is more threatening when it begins to be recognized as sociological as well
psychological in nature. Below are two major themes the first stressing the psychological aims of propaganda the
second the sociological aims.
2/11/2015 10:40 PM
11 of 12
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propaganda:_The_Formation_of_Men's_Att...
established order through long term penetration and progressive adaptation by using all social currents. The
propaganda element is the way of life with which the individual is permeated and then the individual begins to
express it in film, writing, or art without realizing it. This involuntary behavior creates an expansion of society
through advertising, the movies, education, and magazines. "The entire group, consciously or not, expresses
itself in this fashion; and to indicate, secondly that its influence aims much more at an entire style of life."[24]
This type of propaganda is not deliberate but springs up spontaneously or unwittingly within a culture or nation.
This propaganda reinforces the individuals way of life and represents this way of life as best.
Brainwashing
Conformity
Ideology
Indoctrination
Media manipulation
Mind control
Propaganda
Psychological manipulation
Psychological warfare
Social Influence
Socially constructed reality
1. Ellul, Jacques. (1964) The Technological Society. New York: Vintage Books, from the translator's introduction by
John Wilkinson, p.ix.
2. Bernays, Edward. "Propaganda" (http://www.historyisaweapon.org/defcon1/bernprop.html). (1928)
3. Ellul, Jacques (1973). Propaganda: The Formation of Mens Attitudes, p. xi-xii. Trans. Konrad Kellen & Jean
Lerner. Vintage Books, New York. ISBN 978-0-394-71874-3.
4. Ellul, Jacques (1973). Propaganda: The Formation of Mens Attitudes, p. x. Trans. Konrad Kellen & Jean Lerner.
Vintage Books, New York. ISBN 978-0-394-71874-3.
5. Origins of mass communications research during the American Cold War ... - Page 22 by Timothy Richard Glander
- Language Arts & Disciplines - (2000)
6. Ellul, Jacques (1973). Propaganda: The Formation of Mens Attitudes, p. 25. Trans. Konrad Kellen & Jean Lerner.
Vintage Books, New York. ISBN 978-0-394-71874-3.
7. Ellul, Jacques (1965). Propaganda: The Formation of Mens Attitudes, p.i, xviii. Trans. Konrad Kellen & Jean
Lerner. Vintage Books, New York. ISBN 978-0-394-71874-3.
8. Ellul, Jacques (1973). Propaganda: The Formation of Mens Attitudes, p.4. Trans. Konrad Kellen & Jean Lerner.
Vintage Books, New York. ISBN 978-0-394-71874-3.
9. Ellul, Jacques (1973). Propaganda: The Formation of Mens Attitudes, p.11. Trans. Konrad Kellen & Jean Lerner.
Vintage Books, New York. ISBN 978-0-394-71874-3.
10. Ellul, Jacques (1973). Propaganda: The Formation of Mens Attitudes, p.61. Trans. Konrad Kellen & Jean Lerner.
Vintage Books, New York. ISBN 978-0-394-71874-3.
11. Ellul, Jacques (1973). Propaganda: The Formation of Mens Attitudes, p. 39-40. Trans. Konrad Kellen & Jean
Lerner. Vintage Books, New York. ISBN 978-0-394-71874-3.
12. Ellul, Jacques (1973). Propaganda: The Formation of Mens Attitudes, p. 64 Trans. Konrad Kellen & Jean Lerner.
Vintage Books, New York. ISBN 978-0-394-71874-3.
13. Ellul, Jacques (1973). Propaganda: The Formation of Mens Attitudes, p. 63. Trans. Konrad Kellen & Jean Lerner.
Vintage Books, New York. ISBN 978-0-394-71874-3.
14. Ellul, Jacques (1973). Propaganda: The Formation of Mens Attitudes, p. 62. Trans. Konrad Kellen & Jean Lerner.
Vintage Books, New York. ISBN 978-0-394-71874-3.
2/11/2015 10:40 PM
12 of 12
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propaganda:_The_Formation_of_Men's_Att...
15. Ellul, Jacques (1973). Propaganda: The Formation of Mens Attitudes, p. 65. Trans. Konrad Kellen & Jean Lerner.
Vintage Books, New York. ISBN 978-0-394-71874-3.
16. Ellul, Jacques (1973). Propaganda: The Formation of Mens Attitudes, p. 106-108. Trans. Konrad Kellen & Jean
Lerner. Vintage Books, New York. ISBN 978-0-394-71874-3.
17. Ellul, Jacques (1973). Propaganda: The Formation of Mens Attitudes, p. 162-163. Trans. Konrad Kellen & Jean
Lerner. Vintage Books, New York. ISBN 978-0-394-71874-3.
18. Rivero (1957) "Technique de formation de l'opinion publique", L'Opinion Publique
19. Doob, Leonard (148). Public Opinion and Propaganda, Ch 5. Henry Holt and Company, New York.
20. Ellul, Jacques (1973). Propaganda: The Formation of Mens Attitudes, p. 7. Trans. Konrad Kellen & Jean Lerner.
Vintage Books, New York. ISBN 978-0-394-71874-3.
21. Ellul, Jacques (1973). Propaganda: The Formation of Mens Attitudes, p. 34. Trans. Konrad Kellen & Jean Lerner.
Vintage Books, New York. ISBN 978-0-394-71874-3.
22. Ellul, Jacques (1973). Propaganda: The Formation of Mens Attitudes, p. 37. Trans. Konrad Kellen & Jean Lerner.
Vintage Books, New York. ISBN 978-0-394-71874-3.
23. Ellul, Jacques (1973). Propaganda: The Formation of Mens Attitudes, p. 38. Trans. Konrad Kellen & Jean Lerner.
Vintage Books, New York. ISBN 978-0-394-71874-3.
24. Ellul, Jacques (1965). Propaganda: The Formation of Mens Attitudes, p. 62.Trans. Konrad Kellen & Jean Lerner.
Vintage Books, New York. ISBN 978-0-394-71874-3.
Ellul, Jacques. The Technological Society, New York: Knopf, 1964 (original French edition, 1954)
Chomsky, Noam and Herman, Edward. Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. New
York: Pantheon Books. (1988)
2/11/2015 10:40 PM