Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
1
July 2007
STAFF
HANDBOOK FOR STAFF MEMBERS IN
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
56
Work Plan
Competence Assessment
10
11 13
13
14
14
Competencies
14
15
15
15 18
18 19
19
19 20
20 22
22 - 24
25
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
26
27
APPENDICES
28 - 41
Appendix 1A:
Required Content Work Plan for Managerial Staff
29
Appendix 1B:
Required Content Work Plan for Non-Managerial Staff
30
Appendix 2:
Required Content Competence Assessment Sheet
31
Appendix 3:
Required Content Agreed Changes to the Work Plan
32
Appendix 4:
Suggested Interim Evaluation Form
33
Appendix 5:
Required Content Performance Review Form
34 - 40
41
INTRODUCTION
Managing performance is increasingly important with the public and other stakeholders
expecting as the norm and not the exception, good service, integrity, transparency and
accountability. Government institutions are often held to a higher level of accountability, and
understandably so, as the public requires value for taxes paid.
People make things happen and therefore the contribution of human effort to organizational
success is as important as any other resource input. The quality of the performance of civil
servants is critical to achieving the outcomes sought by government, the general development of
the country and the expectations of the people. In light of this, the Performance Management
and Appraisal System (PMAS) has been introduced as a means of managing and improving staff
performance and accountability in the Public Service.
The PMAS is an improved system of performance management and evaluation. It clearly
defines how your work contributes to the achievement of the organisations goals and identify
what needs to be done to ensure you are given the opportunity for personal growth and
development in your work life. Properly implemented, this is a win-win system. The employees
skills, talents and interest will be honed and guided for maximum performance and the
organization will benefit from the combined performance of all staff.
This HANDBOOK is designed as a reference for all staff in the public sector operating within
the guidelines of the new PMAS.
Page 1 of 41
Introducing a Performance Management and Appraisal System for the public service will help to
transform the dominant culture into one that is committed to providing service internally and to all who
interact with Government organisations, in a manner that is focused on customer satisfaction, delivered
with professionalism, courtesy and integrity, to the benefit of the wider society, truly exemplifying
Government at Your Service.
Page 2 of 41
1.
2.
3.
7.
8.
Mar-06
Page 3 of 41
BUDGET ALLOCATIONS
(Financial resources to be made available to the Ministry/Department based on key government
objectives)
Page 4 of 41
Effective Communication
Employees at all levels must have a clear understanding of the purpose of their job,
responsibilities and what outputs they are expected to produce. The output focused job
descriptions capture this and other job related information.
4.2
Objectivity
Evaluations must be made against clearly stated and documented performance standards stated in
your work plan.
4.3
There should be no surprises at the time of the end of year evaluation, if the other principles
have been observed.
Evaluations for all staff are based on the results achieved by an individual, after receiving
feedback on performance during the year and the application of the appropriate corrective
action.
4.4
Fairness
During the year, decisions and actions related to the achievement of performance standards,
are made with due regard to changing circumstances and resources.
Page 5 of 41
4.5
Equitable Treatment
All employees are to be treated equally and have equal and appropriate access to benefits, training
and resources to achieve the performance standards set.
4.6
5. What must happen for the PMAS to be ready for full implementation in
my organisation?
PREREQUISITES FOR IMPLEMENTING THE SYSTEM
1. Top management must understand and commit to the principles and fundamental values of the system
2. The organisation must have a Strategic or Corporate Plan
3. The organisation must have a one year Operational Plan that links into the Strategic Plan
4. The organisation must also have Divisional/Unit Plans that link into the Operational Plan
5. An internal implementation team (comprised mainly of managers) must be established and commit to
meeting regularly to drive the implementation of the PMAS in the organisation. This team is called
the Employee Performance Management and Appraisal Team (EPMAT).
6. A communication plan must be developed to ensure that staff has a clear understanding of what is
required of them during the development and implementation of the PMAS.
7. Output focused job descriptions must be developed, identifying the accountabilities of and
competencies required for each position in the organization.
8. Work plans for each individual must be developed, indicating how major tasks assigned for the year,
are linked to the objectives of the Division or Unit in which they work, and how their successful
completion will be measured.
9. Managers and supervisors must be trained in key competencies such as performance planning,
monitoring, management and conducting performance appraisals
10. A clearly defined performance appraisal cycle and process, must be communicated in a user-friendly
format to all staff
11. How the required performance as agreed will be tracked, must be discussed and communicated by the
manager/supervisor with each staff member, to ensure transparency and fairness in the management
of performance, including taking corrective action for underperformance.
Performance Management and Appraisal System (PMAS)
Office of The Cabinet
Page 6 of 41
Your signature
Your managers/supervisors
Head of Department/Division
Management/Administrative Responsibilities
Technical/Professional Responsibilities
Human Resource Management Responsibilities
Other Responsibilities
Core (general)
Technical (job specific)
Page 7 of 41
The work plan is not developed in a vacuum but must link to the organisations operational
plan and your Divisions/Sections related work plan. This way you can be sure that your work
assignments are focused on the right priorities.
Your Work Plan is the document that defines what you are expected to focus on
doing/producing over a given year. It defines the following:
1. Period (financial year or calendar year or related portion)
2. Name
3. Employee #
4. Related Operational / Unit Plan Objective (if directly linked)
5. Your individual objective as it relates to the Unit Plan Objective
6. Major Tasks
7. Outputs
8. Performance Standards related to the outputs
9. Resources required to deliver the outputs at the standard expected
10. Actual results against stated performance standards
11. Signatures that validate the work plan when first done
Your signature
Your mangers/supervisors signature
Date agreed
12. Evaluation rating given (when appraised) based on actual results against the expected
performance standard
Appendix 1A and 1B has the Guideline Systems Work Plan forms. One of the two forms will
apply to you.
Page 8 of 41
Mechanisms form).
Agreed Changes to the Work Plan
During the year changes to your work plan must be agreed and documented to ensure that the work and
outputs you have produced over the year, as circumstances and resources have changed, are recorded
before the end of year appraisal. Agreed Changes to the Work Plan captures all or some of the following
information depending on the type of change:
1. Period (financial year or calendar year or related portion)
2. Name
3. Employee #
4. Type of change being made Addition, Deletion or Change
5. Your individual objective related to the change
6. Major Tasks
7. Outputs
8. Performance Standards related to the outputs
9. Resources required to deliver the outputs at the standard expected
10. Reason for the change
11. Signatures that validate the agreed changes to the work plan as required
See Appendix 3 for the Guideline Systems Agreed Changes to the Work Plan form.
Page 9 of 41
Career planning and the development of job related knowledge will be facilitated during the
performance monitoring and evaluation process, without your having to make a separate special
request to discuss these issues.
Page 10 of 41
Page 11 of 41
Page 12 of 41
CO18
Step 5: March/April
Annual Review,
Setting targets for
new financial year,
including those in
relation to training
& development
Step 2: June/July
Review performance
in relation to targets
& agree appropriate
adjustments/ action
Step 4: December/January
Step 3: September/October
Page 13 of 41
Competencies
In the performance planning phase the technical competencies against which you will be assessed should
reflect those that are most critical for the achievement of the targets on your work plan1. All Core
competencies however, must be appraised as they are common to all staff members and are considered
important to the organisation regardless of the position a staff member holds.
Assessment against all technical competencies may not be necessary in a given work plan period
Page 14 of 41
Interim Evaluations
Steps 2, 3 and 4 of the Performance Management and Appraisal Cycle represent these interim
evaluations. Quarterly interim evaluations are recommended, however some organizations opt to do half
yearly reviews. Ensure that you are aware of what has been decided by your organisation and also ensure
that interim evaluations are held when they should be. This activity helps to ensure that the Values and
Principles of the PMAS are observed. Interim evaluations should focus on the work achieved as well as
the required job related competencies demonstrated by the individual in delivering on his/her work
assignments. The results of interim evaluations must be documented in the format agreed. Appendix 4
provides a suggested format. Ask your HRM Unit for the format agreed for your organisation.
In between interim evaluations feedback should also be given as a part of the ongoing monitoring of
performance. Monitoring allows:
The development of two-way communication between the manager/supervisor and their staff
Positive or negative feedback soon after a critical or significant incident/event
Corrective action to be taken and training needs to be identified/addressed, in a timely manner
The Revision of work plans as and when necessary
Issues that have been discussed and documented throughout the year will be used to assist in the
formal end-of-year appraisal.
Page 15 of 41
Supporting Documentation
It is important to have all the relevant documentation to support the performance appraisal or review,
otherwise, the credibility of the assessment will be questionable. The following documentation must be
brought to the performance review:
1. The initial work plan agreed
2. Changes agreed to the work plan and the revised work plan (if one was redone)
3. The list of agreed assessment mechanisms for competencies
4. Notes/the agreed form used in the interim evaluation(s)
5. Log notes related to critical incidents that had an impact on planned work activities
Page 16 of 41
Evaluation Scores2
The evaluation scores assigned based on the actual results achieved on the work plan (stated as a %)
against performance standards and competencies as agreed, are determined using the following:
Results Category
>100%
100%
75%-99%
50%-74%
<50%
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Unsatisfactory
Based on the scoring as set out in the PMAS Guideline and System Reference Manual
Page 17 of 41
2. Review existing records with the employee including interventions designed to improve performance
in specific areas identified as problematic
*IMPORTANT REMINDER*
At the time of the final or end of year performance evaluation, an employee should not be rated below the
minimum standard unless, at the time of the previous interim evaluation(s), the employee was formally
notified of the need to improve performance, and an improvement plan developed and implemented.
Signing The Performance Appraisal
An employee must sign the Performance Appraisal form and write a comment. In a case where the
employee wishes to file an appeal, this should be included in the employees comments.
The supervisors signature on the Performance Appraisal Form signals that he/she has discussed the
appraisal with the employee and in the capacity as supervisor, and affirms the validity of the appraisal
exercise. The supervisor must also write a comment about the employees performance.
Take initiative
Keep-abreast of changes in the workplace and seek to identify further opportunities for
developmental opportunities and experiences. This may be done by simple but invaluable
methods such as observing how others perform tasks, seeking counsel from in-house or other
experts, internet research, or by reading books.
Page 18 of 41
Page 19 of 41
The problem and basis for disagreement must have been defined
Existing records, including interventions designed to improve performance in specific areas identified
as problematic, must have been reviewed with the employee
Step 2:
The Employee, Direct Supervisor & Reviewing Manager
should try to resolve the issue
Step 3:
The intervention of the Senior Human Resource Manager
should be sought
Step 4:
If there is still no resolution, a Panel will be appointed to
adjudicate the appeal
Step 5:
The recommendation of the Panel will be presented to the
Permanent Secretary/Head of Department for a final ruling.
Legal action may be pursued if there is a point of Law in
question.
Page 20 of 41
1. After completing Steps 1 and 2, if the Aggrieved Party is still dissatisfied with the overall
performance rating received, he/she may submit a written Appeal3 to the HR Division, within five
days4 of receiving the copy of the completed Performance Appraisal, signed by all required
parties.
2. The HR Division must issue a written acknowledgement of receipt of the Appeal to the Aggrieved
Party and other relevant parties, including the Head of Division and/or the Reviewing Manager,
within five days of receiving the Appeal. The HR Division will manage and monitor the different
stages of the Performance Management Appeals Process and ensure confidentiality and security of
all relevant documents.
3. The appropriate senior officer from the HR Division is required to meet with the employee,
supervisor and reviewing manager within ten days of the date of the written acknowledgement of
the grievance by the HR Division.
4. Having met with the relevant parties and reviewed the existing records, including interventions
designed to improve performance in specific areas identified, the senior officer must then prepare
a written recommendation within ten days. The recommendation must be placed on the
Employees Personal file and communicated to each party involved at this stage5.
5. If the Aggrieved Party is not satisfied with the recommendation, he/she has the right to request (in
writing) that the HR Division proceed to the next stage. This should be done within five days of
receipt of the recommendation.
6. If the Aggrieved Party accepts the recommendation the Appeal should be considered closed.
7. The next step of the Performance Management Appeals Process will be adjudicated by a Panel
comprising 5 members appointed by the Permanent Secretary/Head of Department. No member of
the Panel should be from the Aggrieved Party's Division.
8. The Panel is expected to meet within ten days of receiving the request. The Panel will determine
what information is needed and all relevant parties will be required to submit the requested
documentation. The information must be submitted to the HR Division within fifteen days of the
Panel requesting it. The HR Division will provide each party with the documentation received.
The HR Division will be responsible for scheduling the Panel meeting(s) and informing the
relevant parties of the meeting date(s).
9. The Aggrieved Party has the right of representation by person(s) of his/her choice. If a Civil
Servant is selected as a representative, he/she should not have any unexpired disciplinary action.
All parties must seek approval in advance to have witnesses appear before the Panel. Minutes of
each meeting of the Panel must be taken.
10. The Panel must review all the information provided within ten days, and by majority vote decide
the recommendation to the Permanent Secretary/Head of Department. The Panel must ensure that
its recommendation is consistent with the relevant regulations.
It is advisable that a grievance form be developed by the organisation to simplify the process.
days when mentioned in this section, refers to working days
5 this applies to every stage until the Performance Management Appeals Process is exhausted
4
Page 21 of 41
11. The Permanent Secretary/Head of Department can accept, reject or modify the Panels
recommendation. The Permanent Secretary/Head of Department will submit the written decision
to the Aggrieved Party and all other related parties within ten days of receiving the Panels
recommendation.
12. The decision of the Permanent Secretary/Head of Department shall be considered final.
13. Should the Aggrieved Party be dissatisfied with the decision on a point of law, he/she may pursue
legal action.
IMPORTANT TO NOTE
The timelines recommended in the Performance Management Appeals Process is intended to reflect the
maximum timeframes anticipated for each step. Closure of the Appeals Process should be sought as soon
as is possible, while ensuring that transparency, integrity and fairness is upheld at all times.
Page 22 of 41
3. You will now be appraised on the output you achieve and the manner in which you
achieve that output (competencies demonstrated), rather than on purely subjective factors.
4. The results of the appraisal will provide useful information with respect to performance
improvement, continuous professional development and career management.
c. What recourse do I have if I have an appeal against the Performance Management and
Appraisal System not the outcome of my personal appraisal, but a principle on which the
system is based?
Ans:
The Performance Management Implementation Team (PMIT) that leads the implementation
process Service-wide, will review all appeals against the system. Any such appeals should be
brought to the attention of the Senior Human Resource Director with responsibility for your
Ministry/Department, who will then route it through the appropriate channel.
d. What recourse do I have if I disagree with the end of year appraisal of my performance?
Ans:
The PMAS Guideline and Reference Manual and this Handbook outline the process that should
be followed. Ask your HRM Division for the details.
f.
Will the payment of my increment still be automatic, as has been the practice?
Ans:
No. It will be based on the results of the end of year performance appraisal. In keeping with the
Staff Orders, it will be based on satisfactory performance. The PMAS states that an overall score
of at least 75% must be achieved for an increment to be paid.
Page 23 of 41
Ans:
At the time of the interim evaluation(s) (quarterly/half-yearly and as otherwise necessary), the
supervisor/manager will provide feedback to the employee on their performance and facilitate
improvement, where necessary, with the help of the Human Resource Management Department.
If at the time of the formal end of year appraisal, an employees performance is still considered
poor even though efforts have been made as agreed to facilitate performance improvement and
b. the outcome of the performance appraisal is signed off by the reviewing manager and
c. there is no appeal pending,
the employees salary increment will not be paid if a score of at least 75% is not achieved. It
should also be noted that Section 14.4.3 of the Staff Orders states the following:
Following confirmation of permanent employment, an employee may have his/her service
terminated if his/her performance on the job is assessed over two years to be consistently below
established performance standards or expectation.
Until such a decision has been taken, the HR Department will work along with the employee and
the supervisor in order to facilitate improvements in performance.
i.
j.
k. What can I expect if I have achieved an overall score of 75% but I am already at the top of
my salary scale?
Ans:
If your organisation has implemented the PMAS, you would be eligible for a one-off
payment. Ministry of Finance and Planning issued a circular with respect to this. Ask
your HRM Division for more details.
Page 24 of 41
Plan to have/do the following before meeting to discuss work plans and the basis for assessment of
competencies:
Manager/Supervisor
Staff Member
Manager/Supervisor
Staff Member
Page 25 of 41
Staff Member
Staff Member
Page 26 of 41
Plan to have/do the following before meeting to do the final/end of year evaluation:
Manager/Supervisor
Staff Member
Staff Member
Page 27 of 41
APPENDICES
Page 28 of 41
FORM PP1-M
*REQUIRED
Evaluation
Score for
Actual Result
Results
Category
101%
STRATEGY:
100%
75% - 99%
50% - 74%
0 49%
*REQUIRED
Name : *REQUIRED
Performance Standard
Critical Resources
Required
*REQUIRED
Major Task
Output
*REQUIRED
*REQUIRED (may
have more than 1
key output for a
major task)
Employee# *REQUIRED
Actual Result
Evaluation
Score
*REQUIRED at
EOY appraisal,
but can be noted
at interim
appraisal if
already
completed
Total Score
Date Agreed: __*REQUIRED __ Signatures: __*REQUIRED __ (Manager/Snr.Dir.)
*REQUIRED at
EOY appraisal
Page 29 of 41
Results
Category
1 2 3 4 5
Optional but
useful to
put in for
database
queries
FORM PP1-NM
*REQUIRED
Evaluation
Score for
Actual Result
Results
Category
101%
100%
75% - 99%
50% - 74%
*REQUIRED
0 49%
Output
*REQUIRED
*REQUIRED (may
have more than 1
key output for a
major task)
*REQUIRED
*REQUIRED at
EOY appraisal,
but can be noted
at interim
appraisal if
already
completed
Total Score
Date Agreed: ___*REQUIRED ___ Signatures: ___*REQUIRED ___ (Employee) ___*REQUIRED ____ (Manager/Supervisor)
Page 30 of 41
*REQUIRED at
EOY appraisal
Optional but
useful to
put in for
database
queries
*REQUIRED
EMPLOYEE # *REQUIRED
JOB TITLE:
GRADE:
*REQUIRED
*REQUIRED
This form must be completed during the initial work planning meeting at the start of the
financial year or agreed work period. The measurement mechanisms agreed should be
reviewed during the year to ensure that they are practical and useful in determining
whether the officer has demonstrated the requisite competencies in executing their job.
CORE COMPETENCIES
REQUIRED
LEVEL
CORE COMPETENCIES
*REQUIRED
TECHNICAL COMPETENCIES
Refer to Job Description or agreed
framework for description of attributes
*REQUIRED
Date _*REQUIRED _
Date _*REQUIRED _
Where applicable. There may be differing ways of defining specialized technical competencies across
ministries/departments. Some may have descriptions that are not categorised by numeric levels e.g. excellent, very good,
good, basic. Refer to the job descriptions or the organisations competency framework (if one has been defined) for the
required levels.
Page 31 of 41
FORM PP2
Major
Tasks
*REQUIRED
*REQUIRED
if the
objective
has more
than one
task
associated
with it
Outputs
Performance
Standards
Resources
Required
Change
Type
Reason
Signature
of
Employee
& Date
Signature
of
Manager/
Supervisor
& Date
*REQUIRED
*REQUIRED
*REQUIRED
A/D/C*
* A Addition
*REQUIRED
*REQUIRED
State whether
additional,
less, same
required
*REQUIRED
D Deletion C Change
Page 32 of 41
Employee# *REQUIRED
Q2
Q3
Before attempting to do the Interim Evaluation, please have the latest agreed work plan (Form
PP1-NM or PP1-M) complete with Actual Results to date, the Agreed Competence Assessment
Mechanism (Form PP3) and Agreed Changes to the Work Plan (Form PP2).
On
track
Not on
Track
Barriers/Constraints
*REQUIRED
Action Agreed or
Other Comment
*REQUIRED
SECTION B COMPETENCIES
Competence
On
track
Not on
Track
Barriers/Constraints
*REQUIRED
Action Agreed or
Other Comment
*REQUIRED
Page 33 of 41
Q2
Q3
OR
2. GRADE: *REQUIRED
*REQUIRED
*REQUIRED
Promotion
Transfer
Resignation
Other
Before attempting to complete Sections A and B, please have the latest agreed work plan
(Form PP1-NM or PP1-M) complete with the Actual Results Total, the Agreed Competence
Assessment Mechanism (Form PP3) and Agreed Changes to the Work Plan (Form PP2)
D=BxC
E = A/D
ACTUAL RESULTS
TOTAL FOR ALL
STANDARDS
TOTAL NUMBER OF
STANDARDS
STANDARD MET
FULLY
MAXIMUM SCORE IF
ALL TARGETS MET AT
100%
*REQUIRED
*REQUIRED
100
*REQUIRED
*REQUIRED
Page 34 of 41
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Unsatisfactory
SECTION B (add rows as required to accommodate the list of competencies for the employee)
Appraisal against competencies (competencies as agreed and listed on FORM PP3).
Core Competencies
Required
Level
Actual
Performance
Rating
Critical
Functional/Technical
Competencies
Required
Level
Actual
Performance
Rating
1. *REQUIRED
*REQUIRED
*REQUIRED
1. *REQUIRED
*REQUIRED
*REQUIRED
2.
2.
3.
3.
4.
4.
5.
5.
TOTAL
TOTAL
*REQUIRED
*REQUIRED
PLUS
GRAND TOTAL/AGGREGATE SCORE = *REQUIRED
Page 35 of 41
D=BxC
E = A/D
AGGREGATE
SCORE FOR ALL
COMPETENCIES
TOTAL NUMBER OF
COMPETENCIES
(CORE AND
TECHNICAL)
RATING
INDICATING
COMPETENCE
DEMONSTRATED
WITH EXCELLENCE
MAXIMUM SCORE
IF ALL MET AT
REQUIRED LEVEL
OVERALL SCORE
FOR
COMPETENCIES
*REQUIRED
*REQUIRED
*REQUIRED
*REQUIRED
SECTION C
Calculate the Overall Performance Score
The employees overall performance score is derived using the formula:
[(Overall score for quantifiable outputs X 0.6) +(Overall score for competencies X 0.4)]X 100
= Overall Percentage Performance Rating or Score
OVERALL
SCORE FOR
QUANTIFIABLE
OUTPUTS
AGREED
WEIGHTING
*REQUIRED
0.6
C=AxB
*REQUIRED
OVERALL SCORE
FOR
COMPETENCIES
AGREED
WEIGHTING
*REQUIRED
0.4
Page 36 of 41
F=DxE
G = (C+F)
x 100
%
*REQUIRED
*REQUIRED
RECOMMENDATION(S): *REQUIRED
Pay increment
Withhold increment
Level 1
8
Job enrichment
Reassignment
Remedial Action
Probation
Dismissal
Other
Level 2
Level 3
7
8
Page 37 of 41
CURRENT POSITION
Skills / Competencies To Be
Enhanced Or Developed
Remarks
CAREER ASPIRATIONS
1. Indicate the type of role, subject or functional area
you are interested in
Remarks
YES
NO
YES
NO
Page 38 of 41
Signed: *REQUIRED
Date: *REQUIRED
Employees comments:
Sign and date this section to show that you have seen, read and understood this
assessment, including your managers changes and comments. If you disagree with them in
any way you should briefly say why here.
*REQUIRED
Signed: *REQUIRED
Date: *REQUIRED
Page 39 of 41
Where applicable, the reviewing manager must complete this section when the
sections above have been signed.
Reviewing managers overall comments:
Read this assessment and supporting documentation and make any
comments/recommendations that you feel may be appropriate.
*REQUIRED
Signed: *REQUIRED
Date: *REQUIRED
*REQUIRED
PLEASE RETURN THIS FORM TO THE MANAGER/SUPERVISOR FOR IT TO BE SUBMITTED TO
THE HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT.
BEFORE SO DOING, THE MANAGER/SUPERVISOR MUST PROVIDE THE EMPLOYEE WITH A
COPY AND RETAINED ONE AS WELL.
Date
Managers/
Supervisors
Signature
Received by (HR
Dept.)
*REQUIRED
*REQUIRED
*REQUIRED
Date
Initial
*REQUIRED
*REQUIRED
*REQUIRED
*REQUIRED
*REQUIRED
*REQUIRED
Page 40 of 41
Date Revised:
July 2007
Previous Version #:
2.0
Date Issued:
February 2007
SECTION
2.0
19
2.1
20
2.1
Appendices
2.0
Numbered pages now consistently reflect the correct last page number.
In this version of the Handbook, it is 41
Page 41 of 41
2.1