Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Abstract
This study looks at the effects of macro environmental factors on the adoption and usage of Information and
Communication Technology by SMEs in Bangladesh. A mixed method research approach (i.e. qualitative
field study followed by a quantitative survey) was employed to develop the research model and test
hypothesised relationships among the study constructs. Eight hypotheses are constructed to attain the
research objectives. A PLS based structural equation modeling was employed with a dataset of 557 SMEs
for the estimates. Data were collected through a questionnaire survey from different SMEs in Bangladesh
selected by applying a stratified random sampling technique. The structural model reveals a significant
association of perceived usefulness, technology infrastructure of the country, and government policy and
subsidy with SMEs intention to use ICT. The estimates also show a strong and significant effect of intention
on actual ICT usage behaviour. The study concludes with implications.
Keywords: Information and communication technology, intention and actual usage behaviour, technology
acceptance model, macro environmental factors
Introduction
The rapid usage growth of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) has reshaped the global
socio-economic and business environment, and made changes in the pattern of personal, social and business
communication in the past few years. The worlds shift towards the digital culture, from the traditional way
of communication and transaction creates enormous opportunities for the individuals and businesses.
Diversified use of ICT, particularly the Internet, affects everyone on the planet even those who do not
themselves have first-hand access to ICTs. All necessary services, such as food distribution, power networks,
water supplies or mass transportation are now controlled and managed by ICT networks and applications. In
the past few years, the developed countries have received huge benefits by diversified and innovative
applications of ICT as of their high ICT penetration and developed infrastructure. Following the achievement
of developed countries, the developing countries are also motivated to implement ICT into various functional
areas in view of ensuring ICTs potentials in the economic development. The philosophy of economic
development though ICT involve the SMEs in the ongoing research initiatives as it is one of the most
influential parts of any countrys development process.
Like developed countries, SMEs in developing countries are also contributing positively in the
development process. As a developing country, the prospects and contribution of Bangladeshs SMEs in its
economic development are enormous. SMEs account for about 45% of manufacturing value addition in
Bangladesh. They account for about 80% of industrial employment, about 90% of total industrial units and
about 25% of the total labour force. Its total contribution to export earnings varies between 75% and 80%.
The number of SMEs and its significant contribution to the national economy in terms of employment
generation, GDP contribution and export earnings thus create a significant research opportunity to look at the
adoption and diffusion of information and communication technology.
In the past, the adoption and diffusion phenomenon of ICT from an organizational perspective has been
looked into mostly by anticipating the effects of innovation characteristics and the impacts of organizational,
institutional and environmental forces (see Davis, 1989; Thong, 1999; Zhu et al., 2003; Venkatesh et al,
2003; Venkatesh& Zhang, 2010; Azam &Quaddus, 2012; Madden, Azam & Beard, 2013) . However, the
impacts of macro country level environmental factors have not been studied widely in addressing the ICT
adoption and diffusion. This study considers macro environmental factors as antecedents of ICT adoption and
diffusion among the SMEs in Bangladesh.
55 | ICEBM 2013
56 | ICEBM 2013
Due to space limitation, statements and quotations of the field study are not stated in detail.
57 | ICEBM 2013
58 | ICEBM 2013
Table 3,shows construct correlations and square root of average variance extracted of all reflective and
formative constructs. For discriminant validity, square root of AVE value of a construct should be greater
than its relationship with other constructs. While all of the constructs satisfy this rule, the correlation
between technology infrastructure and financial infrastructure are very close. It is not problematic as these
two constructs are formative. The validity of the formative constructs is examined through factor weights and
multicollenearity among the index items. Table 2 shows that all formative constructs are valid for further
analysis.
59 | ICEBM 2013
60 | ICEBM 2013
61 | ICEBM 2013
62 | ICEBM 2013
63 | ICEBM 2013
H1a
H1b
TEC
H1c
HUM
H1d
INT
H2
USE
H1e
FIN
H1f
LEG H1g
GOV
Note: PU=perceived usefulness, PEU=perceived ease of use, TEC=technology infrastructure, HUM=human
infrastructure, FIN=financial infrastructure, LEG=legal infrastructure, GOV=government policy and subsidy
Figure1: Final Research Model
Frequency
Industry
Manufacturing
Service
282
275
50.6%
49.4%
Sector
Readymade Garments
Lather
ICT and telecommunications
Tourism
225
57
217
58
40.4%
10.2%
39.0%
10.4%
Business Size
Small
Medium
401
156
72.0%
28.0%
ICT Status
Homepage
Online cataloguing
Participate in online commerce
ERP
546
366
325
162
98.0%
65.7%
58.3%
29.1%
Nature of customer
509
48
91.4%
8.6%
Internet connectivity
Dial-up/DSL
Broadband(cable and mobile)
Mobile broadband
29
511
293
5.2%
91.7%
52.7%
ICT Experience
150
407
26.93%
73.07%
64 | ICEBM 2013
Items
Loadings/
Weights
Std. error/
tolerance
t-value /
VIF
CR
AVE
Reflective Constructs
Perceived Usefulness
PU1
0.9541**
0.0051
185.28
(Reflective)
PU2
0.962**
0.0049
196.41
PU3
0.9534**
0.0074
128.94
PU4
0.9177**
0.0093
98.33
PEU1
0.9575**
0.0049
197.26
(Reflective)
PEU2
0.9668**
0.0032
298.37
PEU3
0.9621**
0.0045
213.22
PEU4
0.9041**
0.0129
70.09
Intention
INT1
0.8498**
0.0112
75.75
(Reflective)
INT2
0.8872**
0.012
74.03
INT3
0.9137**
0.0058
156.11
INT4
0.8705**
0.0106
81.86
INT5
0.857**
0.011
77.84
Use
USE1
0.8386**
0.0118
71.13
(Reflective)
USE2
0.8729**
0.01
87.58
USE3
0.8764**
0.0094
92.68
USE4
0.7446**
0.0148
50.19
USE5
0.7594**
0.0152
50.10
TEC
TINFRA1
0.2185
.402
2.489
(Formative)
TINFRA2
0.7877
.419
2.386
TINFRA3
-0.2381
.946
1.057
TINFRA4
-0.499
.649
1.542
HUM
HINFRA1
-0.2461
.310
3.225
(Formative)
HINFRA2
0.8543
.339
2.953
HINFRA3
-0.0983
.523
1.912
LEG
LINFRA1
0.7303
.880
1.136
(Formative)
LINFRA2
-0.0405
.880
1.136
FIN
FINFRA1
1.0229
.683
1.465
(Formative)
FINFRA2
-0.1995
.683
1.465
GOV
GOV1
0.2312
.894
1.119
(Formative)
GOV2
1.0881
.421
2.376
GOV3
-0.1794
.236
4.232
GOV4
-0.4896
.245
4.087
0.971
0.895
0.972
0.898
0.943
0.767
0.911
0.673
0.876
0.573
0.666
0.676
0.592
0.510
0.717
0.591
0.665
0.410
Formative constructs
Note: Table values indicate loadings, standard error and t-valuefor the reflective constructs and weights, tolerance
and VIF value for formative constructs, AVE=Average variance extracted, **=Significant at .001
65 | ICEBM 2013
PEU
TEC
HUM
LEG
FIN
GOV
INT
PU
0.895
PEU
0.644
0.9476
TEC
-0.067
0.027
0.7570
HUM
-0.057
0.09
.727
0.896
LEG
-0.085
0.04
.096
.189
0.7141
FIN
-0.081
0.067
.764
.754
.208
0.7688
GOV
0.164
0.119
.110
.122
.096
0.6403
INT
0.769
0.519
-.087
-0.053
-0.024
-0.079
.180
0.8758
USE
0.71
0.546
-0.012
0.043
0.011
0.006
.187
.723
USE
0.8203
SE
t-statistic
Comments
PU INT
0.723
0.0379
19.06**
Supported
PEU INT
0.037
0.0384
0.96
Not Supported
TEC INT
0.102
0.0373
2.73**
Supported
HUM INT
0.019
0.0315
0.60
Not Supported
FIN INT
0.027
0.0393
0.69
Not Supported
LEG INT
0.045
0.0295
1.52
Not Supported
GOVINT
0.068
0.0256
2.66**
Supported
INT USE
0.925
0.0049
189.39**
Supported
** indicates p< .01, * indicates p< .05 Note: R2 for INT = 0.594, R2 for USE = 0.851
Note: PU=perceived usefulness, PEU=perceived ease of use, TEC=technology infrastructure, HUM=human
infrastructure, FIN=financial infrastructure, LEG=legal infrastructure, GOV=government policy and subsidy,
INT=behavioural intention, USE=use of ICT
66 | ICEBM 2013